Hooker, Sir Joseph D. (1817

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hooker, Sir Joseph D. (1817 natstand: last updated 13/10/2018 URL: www.natstand,org.uk/pdf/HookerJD000.pdf Root person: Hooker, Joseph Dalton (1817 - 1911) Description: Hooker family document Creation date: 2018 October 13 Prepared by: Richard Middleton Notes: Press items reproduced with kind permission of The British Newspaper Archive (www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk) About Natstand family documents: A Natstand family document is intended to provide background information concerning the family of a deceased naturalist. It is hoped that such information will form a framework which will help interpret their surviving correspondence, specimens and records. In some cases it will also give an insight into the influences on their early lives and the family constraints within which they worked and collected. We have found that published family data concerning individuals rarely contain justification for dates and relationships and not infrequently contain errors which are then perpetuated. The emphasis in Natstand family documents will be on providing references to primary sources, whenever possible, which will be backed-up with transcriptions. Although a Natstand biography page will always carry a link to a family document, in many cases these documents will be presented without any further biographical material. We anticipate that this will occur if the person is particularly well known or is someone we are actively researching or have only a peripheral interest in. The following conventions are used: Any persons in the family tree with known natural history associations will be indicated in red type. Any relationships will be to the root naturalist unless otherwise stated. Dates are presented Year – Month – Day e.g. 1820 March 9 or 1820.3.9 1820 March or 1820.3 Dates will be shown in bold type if a reliable reference is presented in the document. In cases where an exact year cannot be given (e.g. it is derived from an age at death), the date will be presented in normal type and preceded with "c" – e.g. c1798. There are some cases where a date is available from a secondary source only (e.g. a published obituary), in these cases it will be presented in italics – e.g. 1823.7.21 Data sources: Census data have been used, whenever possible, to confirm relationships; they are not considered a reliable source of data concerning age. Contemporary newspaper family notices are considered as reliable sources of relationships and dates; reports and obituaries are treated more cautiously. Parish records generally provide a reliable source of data and digitised images have been used whenever possible. Any difficulties with transcription will be made clear. In some cases only transcripts have been available; errors here are usually confined to spelling. The most important source of this material is the International Genealogical Index compiled by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Utah. National Civil Registration Indexes are considered reliable, as are probate records. Richard Middleton James Robert Middleton - 1 of 11 - natstand: last updated 13/10/2018 More biographical details are provided in: Huxley, L. 1918. Life and Letters of Sir Joseph Dalton Hooker. New York. (Two volumes based on materials collected and arranged by Lady Hooker.) Items taken from this source alone are indicated with [L&L] or presented in blue italics in the pedigree. All other relationships and data presented here have, so far as reasonably practicable, been assembled from independent sources. - 2 of 11 - natstand: last updated 13/10/2018 Relationships shown are relate to Joseph Dalton Hooker 1Joseph Hooker (1752.1.30 – 1845.8.24) grandfather *** married Lydia Vincent (1759 – 1829.1.29) on 1782.10.25 uncle Joseph Hooker (1783.11.24 – 1815.1.3) Sir William Jackson Hooker (1785.7.6 – 1865.8.12) father *** married 2Maria Turner (1797.5.29 – 1872.10.16) on 1815.6.12 brother William Dawson Hooker (1816.4.4 – 1840.1.1) *** married Isabella Whitehead Smith (c1818 – 1880.1.29) on 1839.4.22 niece 3Willielma Dawson Hooker (1840.3.6 – 1879.7.17) [posthumous] ***married 4James Campbell (c1836 – 1884.3.7) on 1862.9.4 g-nephew William Jackson Hooker Campbell (1864.11.17 - ) g-nephew Thomas B Campbell (1868.1.8 - ) Engineer to Canada 1905 g-niece Isabella Whitehead Campbell (51869.7.6 – 1959.9.15) [1893: 6Mrs Walter Gardiner] g-nephew James Lumsden Campbell (1871.3.27 – 1919.1.9) male Campbell (1872.12.8 - ) g-nephew ?above = Joseph Dawson Campbell (c1873 -) Solicitor g-nephew 7Lieut. Col. Dr Ranald Douglas Campbell (1875.7.20 – 1955.2.23) g-niece Elizabeth Helen Campbell (c1878 – 1960.12.31) Unmarried Joseph 8Dalton Hooker (1817.6.30 – 1911.12.10) **1 married Frances Harriet Henslow (1825.4.30 – 1874.11.13) on 1851.7.4 son William Henslow Hooker (1853.1.24 – 1942.5.3) daughter Harriet Anne Hooker (1854.6.23 – 1945.12.16) [1877: Mrs Sir William Turner Thistleton-Dyer] son Charles Paget Hooker (1855.7.16 – 1933.2.4) daughter Maria Elizabeth (Minnie) Hooker (1857.8.10 – 1863.9.28) son Brian Harvey Hodgson Hooker (1860.5.27 - 1932.6.17) son Reginald Hawthorn Hooker (1867.1.12 – 1944.6.2) daughter Grace Ellen Hooker (1868 – 1955.12.30) Unmarried **2 married Hyacinth Jardine née Symonds (1842 – 1922.12.8) on 1876.8.22 son Joseph Symonds Hooker (1877 – 1940.4.26) son Richard Symonds Hooker (1885 – 1950.2.18) continued … - 3 of 11 - natstand: last updated 13/10/2018 sister Maria Hooker (1819.5.8 – 1889.10.25) *** married Rev. Dr. Walter McGilvray (c1810 – 1880.6.30) on 1846.3.24 niece Margaret Greene McGilvray (c1847 - ) [1883: Mrs Henry A T Newman] niece Maria Hooker McGilvray (1848.12.14 - ) Unmarried nephew Walter McGilvray (1850.3.17 - 1858) niece Anne McGilvray (1851 – 1862.8.15) nephew Dr. William Jackson Hooker McGilvray (c1853 – 1930.6) nephew Malcolm McGilvray (c1855 – 1879.5.9) niece Elizabeth Evans McGilvray (c1856 - 1942) [1889: Mrs F. H. Milton Whitfield] nephew Thomas F. McGilvray (1860.7.8 – 1957.11.25) sister Elizabeth Hooker (1820.11.15 – 1898.8.1) *** married Dr. Thomas Robert Evans later Lombe (c1821 – 1902.2.23) on 1853.7.20 No Issue sister Mary Harriette Hooker (1825.10.2 – 1841.6.19) - 4 of 11 - natstand: last updated 13/10/2018 Sources: 1752 February 16: Baptisms register, St John, Croydon Baptism of Joseph Hooker, son of James and Sarah Hooker. Child born 1752 January 30. [This may be someone else] 1759 March 18: Baptisms Register, St Saviour, Norwich Baptism of Lydia Vincent, daughter of James and Lydia Vincent. 1782 October 25: England, Marriages, 1538–1973. Salt Lake City, Utah Marriage of Joseph Hooker and Lydia Vincent at St Saviours' Norwich. 1783 November 24: Baptism records, Countess of Huntingdon's Connexion Temple, Norwich Joseph the son of Joseph and Lydia Hooker was born November 24th 1783 baptized the 2nd December 1783 by the Revd Mr Green. 1785 July 6: Baptism records, Countess of Huntingdon's Connexion Temple, Norwich William Jacson [sic] son of Joseph and Lydia Hooker born July 6th 1785 baptized the November 9th 1785 by the Revd Wm Green. 1797 May 29: England & Wales Christening Records, 1530-1906. Provo, UT, USA Birth of Maria, daughter of Dawson Turner and Mary Palgrave. Baptised at Yarmouth, Norfolk, on 1797 July 13. 1815 March 4: *Norfolk Chronicle DIED. Wednesday last, in the 31st year of his age, Mr. Joseph Hooker, jun. of this city. A particular description of his virtues would appear extravagant to those who did not know him, and defective to those who did. It is hoped, however, that they will remain fixed in the remembrance, and be imitated I the lives, of his relatives and friends. To the world they cannot be known, till that awful day, when they will not only be proclaimed but rewarded. 1815 June 17: *Norfolk Chronicle MARRIED – Monday last, at Nicholas' church. Yarmouth, by the Rev. R. Turner, William Jackson Hooker, Esq. of Halesworth, in Suffolk, to Miss Maria Turner, eldest daughter of Dawson Turner, Esq. banker, of Yarmouth. 1816 April 5: England, Births and Christenings, 1538-1975. Salt Lake City, Utah Baptism of William Dawson, son of William Jackson and Maria Hooker at Halesworth, Suffolk. 1817 July 3: England, Births and Christenings, 1538-1975. Salt Lake City, Utah Baptism of Joseph Dalton, son of William Jackson and Maria Hooker at Halesworth, Suffolk. 1819 May 8: England, Births and Christenings, 1538-1975. Salt Lake City, Utah Baptism of Maria, daughter of William Jackson and Maria Hooker at Halesworth, Suffolk. 1820 November 22: England, Births and Christenings, 1538-1975. Salt Lake City, Utah Baptism of Elizabeth, daughter of William Jackson and Maria Hooker at Halesworth, Suffolk. 1825 May 14: England, Births and Christenings, 1538-1975. Salt Lake City, Utah Baptism of Frances Harriet, daughter of John Stevens and Harriet Henslow at St Andrew-the- Great, Cambridge; born April 30. 1825 October 2: Scotland, Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950. Salt Lake City, Utah "Birth of Mary Hariet Jackson, daughter of William Jackson and Maria Turner, Barony, Lanark." [There seems little doubt that this is a garbled and incomplete record of the birth of Mary Harriette Hooker.] - 5 of 11 - natstand: last updated 13/10/2018 1829 February 14: *Norwich Mercury DIED. At Glasgow, on the 29th ult. Mrs Lydia Vincent, aged 70, wife of Joseph Hooker, Esq. late of Norwich. 1839 May 18: *Norfolk Chronicle MARRIED. – Lately, at Glasgow, William Dawson Hooker, M.D. eldest son of Sir W. J. Hooker, to Isabella, eldest daughter of David Smith, Esq. of West Bank, near Glasgow. [Marriage records show the date to have been 1839 April 22] 1840 February 22: *Norfolk Chronicle DIED. – On the 1st January, of yellow-fever, at the residence of Dr.
Recommended publications
  • Miranda, 5 | 2011 Jim Endersby, Imperial Nature: Joseph Hooker and the Practices of Victorian S
    Miranda Revue pluridisciplinaire du monde anglophone / Multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal on the English- speaking world 5 | 2011 South and Race / Staging Mobility in the United States Jim Endersby, Imperial Nature: Joseph Hooker and the Practices of Victorian Science Laurence Talairach-Vielmas Édition électronique URL : http://journals.openedition.org/miranda/2550 ISSN : 2108-6559 Éditeur Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès Référence électronique Laurence Talairach-Vielmas, « Jim Endersby, Imperial Nature: Joseph Hooker and the Practices of Victorian Science », Miranda [En ligne], 5 | 2011, mis en ligne le 29 novembre 2011, consulté le 25 octobre 2018. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/miranda/2550 Ce document a été généré automatiquement le 25 octobre 2018. Miranda is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Jim Endersby, Imperial Nature: Joseph Hooker and the Practices of Victorian S... 1 Jim Endersby, Imperial Nature: Joseph Hooker and the Practices of Victorian Science Laurence Talairach-Vielmas RÉFÉRENCE Jim Endersby, Imperial Nature : Joseph Hooker and the Practices of Victorian Science (Chicago and London : The University of Chicago Press, [2008] 2010), 429 p, ISBN 978–0–226–20791– 9 1 L’ouvrage de Jim Endersby, Imperial Nature : Joseph Hooker and the Practices of Victorian Science, ne se veut pas une biographie du naturaliste Joseph Dalton Hooker (1817–1911). Bien au contraire. Hooker fut un scientifique véritablement victorien, dont la carrière retrace l’évolution du statut de scientifique, les enjeux et tensions au cœur de la profession et les liens entre scientifiques et naturalistes amateurs. L’étude de Endersby se concentre sur les années charnières de la carrière de Hooker, avant son accession à la tête de Kew Gardens, à un moment où le statut du scientifique est en pleine évolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Editorial This Autumn We Have Been Celebrating the Bicentenary of the Birth of Charles Lyell (B
    THE LINNEAN I Editorial This autumn we have been celebrating the bicentenary of the birth of Charles Lyell (b. 14 November 1797) whose greatest contribution to the advancement of science was his Principles of Geology which first appeared during 1830-33 and subsequently went through 13 revisions. Although this work inspired both Darwin and Hooker and furnished Wallace “with the main features of the succession of species in time” - Lye11 could never bring himself to accept “the descent of man from the brutes”. Picture taken by Dr R. Spearman on the occasion ofthe Lyell Bicentenary lecture 31 July 1997. Left to right: G. Prance, W. Stearn CBE. W. Challoner, Jim Secord, S. Berry, M. Claridge, J. Hawkes (two extant PPLs missing. A. Cave & B. Gardiner). Lyell entered the great debate on man’s origins in 1863 with his book entitled Geological Evidences a5 to the Antiquity of Man, coincidentally the same year that T. H. Huxley published his work on the Zoological Evidence as to Man’s Place in Nature. Huxley’s oook brought him notoriety whereas Darwin was somewhat distressed to find that Lyell’s book gave him no stronger support of the mutability of species than a sentence beginning “If it should be rendered highly probable that species change by variation and natural selection....”. Darwin further confided ( 1863) to Hooker 2 THE LINNEAN “I must say how much disappointed I am that he hasn’t spoken out on species, still less on man.. ... The whole certainly struck me as a compilation, but of the highest quality, for when possible the facts have been verified on the spot, making it almost an original work.
    [Show full text]
  • William Borrer of Henfield, Botanist and Horticuituraiist, 1781-18621
    Watsonia, 10 55-60 (1974). 55 William Borrer of Henfield, botanist and horticuIturaIist, 1781-1862 1 H. C. P. SMAlL 6 Lansdowne Close, Worthing, Sussex ABSTRACT A short account is provided of the life of WiIIiam Borrer and of his botanical and horticultural activities. The first half of the 19th century was a truly great period in English botany. In 1814 Sir J. E. Smith completed his monumental English Botany (usually credited to Sowerby by reason of the plates). H. C. Watson approached the subject from a topographical basis and produced his Geographical Distribution of British Plants in 1832. C. C. Babington's Manual of British Botany came out in 1843 and G. Bentham's Handbook of the British Flora, the forerunner of our old friend 'Bentham and Hooker', in 1858. In all these and many other works of the period we find frequent acknowledgments to the records and information provided by William Borrer of Henfield. Borrer was indeed not only the greatest Sussex botanist but also undoubtedly one of the leading botanists of his day. New discoveries were constantly referred to him, often only to find that he had already recorded the plant himself some years before, and his advice was frequently sought on the identification and arrangement of critical species. Nevertheless his name is little known outside botanical circles, and even there it is by no means as familiar as it should be. His retiring character has probably contributed as much as anything to his undeserved obscurity. He wrote no books of his own but was a frequent contributor to the botanical journals and regularly corresponded with such men as Sir Joseph Banks, Dawson Turner, Sir William Jackson Hooker, Sir Joseph Dalton Hooker and Charles Cardale Babington, all of whom esteemed him for his wide knowledge and reliable observation.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Papers of Asa Gray, Vol II, 1841-1886
    This is a reproduction of a library book that was digitized by Google as part of an ongoing effort to preserve the information in books and make it universally accessible. https://books.google.com I ■ *- I University of Virginia Library QK3 G77 1889 V.2 SEL Scientific papers of Asa Gray, NX DD1 7DD 2CH LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA FROM THE BOOKS OF REV. HASLETT McKIM i : i M SCIENTIFIC PAPERS OF ASA GRAY SELECTED BY CHARLES SPRAGUE SARGENT VOL. II. ESSAYS; BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES 1841-1886 T O ■TT'H rp "» T BOSTON AND NEW YORK HOUGHTON, MIFFLIN AND COMPANY ffibe iiiiuTsiDc Pre?!*, £ambrit>or 18S9 3 .GJ 7 1883 1 560^ y, , . Copyright, 1889, Bt CHARLES S PRAGUE SARGENT. All rights reserved. ' The Riverside Frets, Cambridge, Mass , V. S. A. Electrotyped and Printed by II. 0. lloughtou & Company. CONTENTS. ESSAYS. PAGJ European Herbaria 1 Notes of a Botanical Excursion to the Mountains op North Carolina 22 The Longevity of Trees 71 The Flora of Japan 125 Sequoia and its History 142 Do Varieties Wear Out or tend to Wear Out .... 174 ^Estivation and its Terminology 181 A Pilgrimage to Torreya 189 Notes on the History of Helianthus Tubehosus .... 197 Forest Geography and Archeology 204 The Pertinacity and Predominance of Weeds .... 234 The Flora of North America 243 Gender of Names of Varieties 257 Characteristics of the North American Flora .... 260 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. Brown and Humboldt 283 Augustin-Pyramus De Candolle 289 Benjamin D. Greene 310 Charles Wilkes Short 312 Francis Boott 315 William Jackson Hooker 321 John Lindley 333 William Henry Harvey 337 Henry P.
    [Show full text]
  • ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS, KEW Records and Collections, 1768-1954 Reels M730-88
    AUSTRALIAN JOINT COPYING PROJECT ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS, KEW Records and collections, 1768-1954 Reels M730-88 Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond London TW9 3AE National Library of Australia State Library of New South Wales Filmed: 1970-71 CONTENTS Page 4 Historical note 7 Kew collectors series, 1814-55 9 Papers relating to collectors, 1791-1865 10 Official correspondence of Sir William Hooker, 1825-65 17 Official correspondence, 1865-1928 30 Miscellaneous manuscripts 30 Manuscript of James Backhouse 30 Letters to John G. Baker, 1883-90 31 Papers of Sir Joseph Banks, 1768-1819 33 Papers of George Bentham, 1834-1882 35 Papers of Henry Burkill, 1893-1937 35 Records of HMS Challenger, 1874-76 36 Manuscript of Frederick Christian 36 Papers of Charles Baron Clarke 36 Papers of William Colenso, 1841-52 37 Manuscript of Harold Comber, 1929-30 37 Manuscripts of Allan Cunningham, 1826-35 38 Letter of Charles Darwin, 1835 38 Letters to John Duthie, 1878-1905 38 Manuscripts of A.D.E. Elmer, 1907-17 39 Fern lists, 1846-1904 41 Papers of Henry Forbes, 1881-86 41 Correspondence of William Forsyth, 1790 42 Notebook of Henry Guppy, 1885 42 Manuscript of Clara Hemsley, 1898 42 Letters to William Hemsley, 1881-1916 43 Correspondence of John Henslow, 1838-39 43 Diaries of Sir Arthur Hill, 1927-28 43 Papers of Sir Joseph Hooker, 1840-1914 2 48 Manuscript of Janet Hutton 49 Inwards and outwards books, 1793-1895 58 Letters of William Kerr, 1809 59 Correspondence of Aylmer Bourke Lambert, 1821-40 59 Notebooks of L.V.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacy of Collecting Missions to the Valorization of Agro-Biodiversity
    Draft version for this Conference use only. Do not quote without author’s permission. The legacy of collecting missions to the valorization of agro-biodiversity Filomena Rocha (Banco Português de Germoplasma Vegetal, INIAV, I.P.) ([email protected]) Carlos Gaspar (Banco Português de Germoplasma Vegetal, INIAV, I.P.) ([email protected]) Ana Maria Barata (Banco Português de Germoplasma Vegetal, INIAV, I.P.) ([email protected]) _____________________________________________________________________________ Abstract: The history of the civilizations is deeply linked to the history of agriculture, and this has direct links to germplasm collecting and management. Plant collecting activities date back to the beginning of agriculture, with the first steps of plant domestication. Since the most remote times, mankind has depended on plant species collecting, to address its basic needs. For the same reasons, or for cultural and economic reasons, for millennia, people collected and carried seeds, cuttings, seedlings and plants from the places they visited or settled in, and whenever they inhabited new places, they carried the species they knew and which cultivation they mastered. The germplasm collecting is an historic activity that is used in the conservation of genetic resources, especially species for food and agriculture and represents an activity of primary importance within the genetic resources conservation strategies. Germplasm collecting missions have the following main goals: to prevent genetic erosion; to expand or complete the genetic base available in the existent collections; and to meet specific needs (germplasm for breeding programmes, research or development). Between 1977 and 2014, “Banco Português de Germoplasma Vegetal” (BPGV), the National Genebank, carried out 126 collecting missions in mainland Portugal and in the Autonomous Regions of Madeira and the Azores, which resulted in 12,540 accessions of several species (cereals, grain legumes, vegetables, fibers, fodder and pastures, medicinal and aromatic plants).
    [Show full text]
  • Asa Gray's Plant Geography and Collecting Networks (1830S-1860S)
    Finding Patterns in Nature: Asa Gray's Plant Geography and Collecting Networks (1830s-1860s) The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Hung, Kuang-Chi. 2013. Finding Patterns in Nature: Asa Gray's Plant Geography and Collecting Networks (1830s-1860s). Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11181178 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Finding Patterns in Nature: Asa Gray’s Plant Geography and Collecting Networks (1830s-1860s) A dissertation presented by Kuang-Chi Hung to The Department of the History of Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of History of Science Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts July 2013 © 2013–Kuang-Chi Hung All rights reserved Dissertation Advisor: Janet E. Browne Kuang-Chi Hung Finding Patterns in Nature: Asa Gray’s Plant Geography and Collecting Networks (1830s-1860s) Abstract It is well known that American botanist Asa Gray’s 1859 paper on the floristic similarities between Japan and the United States was among the earliest applications of Charles Darwin's evolutionary theory in plant geography. Commonly known as Gray’s “disjunction thesis,” Gray's diagnosis of that previously inexplicable pattern not only provoked his famous debate with Louis Agassiz but also secured his role as the foremost advocate of Darwin and Darwinism in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Mentioned Fields:At Least Descriptions of American
    SOME REFLECTIONS ON THE STATE OF SCIENCE IN AMERICA DURING THE NINETEENTH CENTURY BY I. BERNARD COHEN HARVARD UNIVERSITY For Americans the outstanding problem in the history of science is to try to understand the failure of our country to produce a great scientific tradition in the nineteenth century. In presenting this problem, I have limited my discussion to the period from Franklin to Gibbs, two Americans who by their fundamental contri- butions to physics won the highest distinctions in science, such as foreign or honor- ary membership in the world's great scientific societies and academies-including both the Acad6mie des Sciences (Paris) and the Royal Society of London. Be- tween the two, the record in physics is meager. To be sure, we can always point with pride to Joseph Henry, but the fact remains that Henry was simply not in the same class with Faraday, Clerk Maxwell, Young, Fresnel, Ampere, Joule, Kelvin, Biot, Bunsen, Kirchhoff, Mayer, Helmholtz, and the other greatest giants of the nineteenth century in physics. Furthermore, if we seek mathematical creators in the same interval, there are the members of the Peirce family, but the only outstanding genius in mathematics in America in the nineteenth century was J. J. Sylvester, an Englishman who twice graced our shores. In astronomy things were a little better. There was Newcomb at the century's end and Pickering, and the early photographic experiments-the daguerrotype being used in conjunction with a telescope-and the work of Draper. But how paltry even this is by comparison with the great work done in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Sir William Jackson Hooker1
    PROFESSOR SIR WILLIAM JACKSON HOOKER1 “NARRATIVE HISTORY” AMOUNTS TO FABULATION, THE REAL STUFF BEING MERE CHRONOLOGY 1. Disambiguation: This is not the William Hooker who was producing, in 1833, a NEW POCKET PLAN OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK. HDT WHAT? INDEX WILLIAM J. HOOKER PROFESSOR SIR WILLIAM JACKSON HOOKER 1785 July 6, Wednesday: William Jackson Hooker was born in Norwich, a son of Joseph Hooker of Exeter. After being educated at the high school of Norwich his status as an independent educated gentleman of means would enable him to travel and to take up as a recreation the study of ornithology and entomology. On the recommendation of Sir James Edward Smith (whom he consulted respecting a rare moss), he would soon come to specialize in botany. NOBODY COULD GUESS WHAT WOULD HAPPEN NEXT William J. Hooker “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project HDT WHAT? INDEX PROFESSOR SIR WILLIAM JACKSON HOOKER WILLIAM J. HOOKER 1809 Summer: William Jackson Hooker initial botanical expedition, at the suggestion of Sir Joseph Banks, was to Iceland (the specimens he collected, and all notes and drawings, were destroyed by fire during a homeward voyage in which he came close in addition to losing his life). NO-ONE’S LIFE IS EVER NOT DRIVEN PRIMARILY BY HAPPENSTANCE “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project William J. Hooker HDT WHAT? INDEX WILLIAM J. HOOKER PROFESSOR SIR WILLIAM JACKSON HOOKER 1810 In London, the East India Dock Road and West India Dock Road opened (trade with India was becoming a real big deal). During this year and the following one William Jackson Hooker was making extensive preparations, and sacrifices which would prove financially serious, to be ready to accompany General Sir Robert Brownrigg, 1st Baronet GCB to the Ceylon crown colony of England — but then due to political upheaval this project became impossible.
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Records Committee
    NORFOLK RECORDS COMMITTEE Date: Friday 23 November 2012 Time: 10.30am Venue: The Green Room, The Archive Centre County Hall, Martineau Lane, Norwich Please Note: Arrangements have been made for committee members to park on the county hall front car park (upon production of the agenda to the car park attendant) provided space is available. Persons attending the meeting are requested to turn off mobile phones. ‘Southtown near Yarmouth. Mrs Phillips’, n.d. [possibly 1814]. Pencil sketch by Elizabeth Phillips (née Fraser, 1782-1856), wife of Thomas Phillips (1770–1845), portrait painter, both of whom were friends of Dawson Turner, the banker, botanist and antiquary, of Great Yarmouth, and whom they visited in 1814 (Norfolk Record Office, MC 2847/T4 (Turner, Palgrave and Barker papers)). Membership Mr J W Bracey Broadland District Council Substitute: Mr D Ward Ms D Carlo Norwich City Council Mrs A Claussen-Reynolds North Norfolk District Council Mr P J Duigan Breckland District Council Substitute: Mrs S Matthews Dr C J Kemp South Norfolk District Council Substitute: Mr T Blowfield Mr D Murphy Norfolk County Council Substitute: Mrs J Leggett Mrs E A Nockolds King’s Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council Ms K S Robinson-Payne Great Yarmouth Borough Council Mr M Sands Norwich City Council Ms V Thomas Norwich City Council Mr T Wright Norfolk County Council Substitute: Mrs J Leggett Vacancy Norfolk County Council Substitute: Mr J Joyce Non-Voting Members Mr M R Begley Co-opted Member Mr R Jewson Custos Rotulorum Dr G A Metters Representative of the Norfolk Record Society Dr V Morgan Observer Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • MIMULUS CARDINALIS Douglas Ex Bentham (SCARLET MONKEY
    MIMULUS CARDINALIS Douglas ex Bentham (SCARLET MONKEY FLOWER), AND WHERE IN THE CALIFORNIA COAST RANGES DID DAVID DOUGLAS FIND THE CLOSELY RELATED MIMULUS LEWISII Pursh? By David Rogers Due to its salient corollas, Mimulus cardinalis is one of the most conspicuous (and thus most well known) of the native wildflowers that occur in wet or moist habitats in western North America. Although this species is most often encountered along perennial streams, it can also be found at springs, seeps, and in other kinds of wet or perpetually moist habitats, such as in hanging gardens on seepy cliffs, or at the bases of cliffs where water from a overhanging seep drips. The first scientific specimens of Mimulus cardin- alis, along with the seeds by which it was intro- duced into European gardens, were collected by David Douglas, the famous botanical explorer of western North America, during his extended stay in California in the early 1830s. In a letter to his men- tor, Sir William Jackson Hooker, datelined “Monte- rey, Upper California, Nov. 23rd, 1831,” Douglas noted that “To Mimulus I have added several, among them the magnificent M. cardinalis.”1 Douglas was then on his second expedition to western North America on behalf of the Horticul- tural Society of London, to which he sent his col- lections of plant specimens and seeds; Douglas also made duplicate collections, which he sent to Hooker in Scotland. On the receiving end in London there were two gentlemen who, like Sir William Jackson Hooker, rank amongst the most famous botanists of th the 19 century: George Bentham, the secretary of David Douglas (1799-1834), as portrayed in volume two of The the Horticultural Society, and John Lindley, the Companion to the Botanical Magazine (1836).
    [Show full text]
  • Dawson Turner (1775-1858)
    DAWSON TURNER (1775-1858) Mark Lawley email: [email protected] This is one in a series of articles about prominent British and Irish field-bryologists of the past. The author would be very pleased to learn of any information which supplements its content. A Social and Biographical History of British and Irish Field-bryologists is also available on-line at http://britishbryologicalsociety.org.uk/ Botanical career Turner introduced himself in 1802 to reading botanists with a two-volume Synopsis of British Fuci, followed in 1804 by an Irish Moss Flora (Muscologia Hibernicae Spicilegium, the original drawings for which are at the Natural History Museum in London), and the two-volume Botanist’s Guide through England and Wales (with Lewis Weston Dillwyn) in 1805. He also contributed to Smith and Sowerby’s English Botany (1790-1814, 36 volumes), and wrote nine articles for Annals of Botany and the Transactions of the Linnaean Society between 1800 and 1808. Further publications followed, but the first few years of the 19th century were Turner’s golden botanical period. Indeed, he had lost interest in botany altogether by about 1820, when he donated his herbarium to his son-in-law William Jackson Hooker. Turner’s herbarium is at Kew, together with his incomplete manuscript Flora Norfolciensis, two volumes of botanical memoranda, drawings of algae, and photocopies of his correspondence with William Borrer. Norwich Museum holds algae and journals that belonged to him. Trinity College, Cambridge has 82 volumes of his letters, and there are also letters of his at the British Library, Linnaean Society, and Liverpool and Norwich Public Libraries.
    [Show full text]