China Human Rights Report 2018》

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

China Human Rights Report 2018》 臺灣民主基金會 Taiwan Foundation for Democracy 本出版品係由財團法人臺灣民主基金會負責出版。臺灣民主基金會是 一個獨立、非營利的機構,其宗旨在促進臺灣以及全球民主、人權的 研究與發展。臺灣民主基金會成立於二○○三年,是亞洲第一個國家 級民主基金會,未來基金會志在與其他民主國家合作,促進全球新一 波的民主化。 This is a publication of the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy (TFD). The TFD is an independent, non-profit foundation dedicated to the study and promotion of democracy and human rights in Taiwan and abroad. Founded in 2003, the TFD is the first democracy assistance foundation established in Asia. The Foundation is committed to the vision of working together with other democracies, to advance a new wave of democratization worldwide. 本報告由臺灣民主基金會負責出版,報告內容不代表本會意見。 版權所有,非經本會事先書面同意,不得翻印、轉載及翻譯。 This report has been published by the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy. Statements of fact or opinion appearing in this report do not imply endorsement by the publisher. All rights reserved. No portion of the contents may be reproduced in any form or by any means without prior written permission of the publisher. 臺灣民主基金會 Taiwan Foundation for Democracy 臺灣民主基金會 Taiwan Foundation for Democracy 《China Human Rights Report 2018》 Contents Foreword..................................................................................................... i Preface........................................................................................................ 1 Human Rights Dialogue and Confrontation between China and the West— The China Model Marches through the Global Values System ............13 Political Human Rights ............................................................................ 45 Human Rights in the Chinese Administration of Justice ....................... 83 Social Human Rights ............................................................................. 113 Economic and Environmental Human Rights ........................................ 161 Observations on Religious and Ethnic Minority Human Rights— Who Drew the Red Line? ................................................................. 201 Gender Human Rights ............................................................................ 259 Observations on the Human Rights of Taiwanese People in Mainland China ................................................................................. 291 Observations on Scientific and Technological Human Rights................ 329 Foreword i Preface The Taiwan Foundation for Democracy(TFD) started publishing the China Human Rights Report in 2004, the second year of the foundation’s establishment. This annual tome is now in its 15th incarnation. Under the guidance of the board of directors, a group of scholars has endeavored to keep us abreast of human rights status in China, and to reaffirm Taiwan society’s commitment to democracy and human rights. As laid out in the United Nation’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and International Covenant on Economical, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), the term “human rights” encompasses numerous aspects. For consistency and coherence, this Report has gauged human rights status in China using ICCPR and ICESCR as the benchmark. Carrying on that tradition, the current slate of authors scoured through China’s official documents, media reports and internet information on a wide range of topics to offer insight presented in this China Human Rights Report 2018. This Report has also evolved to reflect current issues in a timely and comprehensive manner. Besides core accounts on political, judicial, social, economic and environmental human rights, as well as those for Taiwanese in Mainland China, we added three chapters in 2017 on dialogue and confrontation between China and the West, gender human rights, as well as religious and ethnic minority human rights. In the Report, we add one more dimension to analyze how Chinese authorities – with the help of technologies in communication and big-data analysis – collect intelligence from people’s on-line chatters and seek to manipulate their off-line activities. Under the direction of Professor Li-wen Tung, the Report project team met every other month to share new findings and coordinate on narrative approaches. The TFD wishes to extend the utmost gratitude to all researchers and research assistants involved for 2018 by Taiwan Foundation for Democracy ii China Human Rights Report 2018 their contribution and dedication. After a quick browse of the Report, one may come to conclude that, the human rights status has hit a new low in political, judicial, economic and environmental human rights, and freedom of religion and ethnic minority; while it was one step forward but two steps backwards in social, gender human rights and Taiwanese’s human rights in Mainland China. As to the impact of technological progress on human rights, Chinese regime is using technology to tighten the grip under the pretense of combatting crime and maintaining social order. Yet, suppression of human rights happens not only within China. Through the Belt and Road Initiative and international collaborative projects, China asserts its position in global human rights governance to leverage China’s political, economy, military, social and cultural clouts in an attempt to alter global notion and norms about human rights. In terms of political human rights, the status in 2018 was worse than in the previous year in two aspects: the right to liberty and the right of political participation. Breaches of the former were of prolonged, extensive, aggravated and new sorts. Abuses of the latter were of prolonged and aggravated types. The corresponding chapter in the Report expounded on transgressions of freedom, including continued ban at the Two Sessions in the name of “maintaining stability,” also in long-term oppressing Gui Minhai, Zhai Jiehong, and Qin Yongmin; extensive impacts by shutting down Neihan Duanzi (a Chinese language reddit-like community); and new violations in cracking down on the Jasic union and the Hong Kong National Party. Aggravated assaults on rights to freedom were seen at the two veteran demonstrations in Zhengjiang and Pingdu where blood was shed in the brawl; an unprecedented phenomenon indicating the size of veteran protests has grown to a magnitude to potentially undermine the regime’s stability. Infarctions of political human rights included: continued persecution of Zhou Ting and Liu Xiaoli, two female activists in Hong Kong, and one aggravated breach by removing presidential term limits from the Constitution. The future of political human rights looks grim for Chinese people. In the area of judicial human rights, China’s judiciary has transformed in the direction to deepen Communist Party’s dominance in judicial policy and operations, rather than improving checks and balances on authorities’ abuse of power. During 2018 by Taiwan Foundation for Democracy Foreword iii 2018, a new Committee to“rule the nation in accordance with the law” (yifa zhiguo) was set up in the Party with Xi Jinping as the director that reiterated the notion to “follow the Party’s guidance.” Escalated violations of judicial human rights transpired under the tricky idea to “rule the nation in accordance with the law”: illegal arbitrary detention and torture, harassing dissidents beyond Chinese border, newly launched National Supervisory Commission operating without due process protection for people investigated, judicial process becoming a tool to silence dissent voices, and constricting lawyers’ practice. China’s judicial reform may have helped to improve judges’ professional expertise and people’s access to justice, but it lacks the political will to overhaul the systemic flaws that have long harmed people’s judicial human rights. In the area of social human rights, China has been pushing through social welfare and social security policies. The 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China in 2017 proclaimed health care, social security and poverty alleviation as policy thrusts, charting a clear route to upholding social human rights. The motives could have been to buttress the regime’s legitimacy by solving social problems and providing social services. People’s living condition and quality of life have indeed improved. However, high profile events during the year – inability to regulate drug prices, shady business of Hongmao medicinal liquor, Changshen’s substandard vaccines, and schools concealing tuberculosis outbreaks – seem to indicate insurmountable hurdles to safeguard people’s social human rights. Such hurdles come from many sources: disparate reform paces among welfare and service systems, bureaucratic issues (blunders, negligence, delay and corruption), the one-party state curbing people’s rights to know and to participate in politics. Ultimately, the author argued, the root cause lies in misplaced objectives of social services: to bolster the regime rather than to recognize and respect human rights values. On the front of economic and environmental human rights, 2018 was rife with authorities’ premature but zealous attempts at governance, and rising social unrest. 2018 by Taiwan Foundation for Democracy iv China Human Rights Report 2018 There were five emerging trends. (1) Same-trade workers formed horizontal telecom- driven alliances (not quite trade unions) to organize wide-range strikes beyond provincial borders and to share struggle experience and aspiration. (2) Workers’ protests at Shenzhen Jasic Technology highlighted the deficiency of the All-Chinese Federation of Trade Unions (ACFTU), the state-sponsored umbrella organization for all
Recommended publications
  • HRWF Human Rights in the World Newsletter Bulgaria Table Of
    Table of Contents • EU votes for diplomats to boycott China Winter Olympics over rights abuses • CCP: 100th Anniversary of the party who killed 50 million • The CCP at 100: What next for human rights in EU-China relations? • Missing Tibetan monk was sentenced, sent to prison, family says • China occupies sacred land in Bhutan, threatens India • 900,000 Uyghur children: the saddest victims of genocide • EU suspends efforts to ratify controversial investment deal with China • Sanctions expose EU-China split • Recalling 10 March 1959 and origins of the CCP colonization in Tibet • Tibet: Repression increases before Tibetan Uprising Day • Uyghur Group Defends Detainee Database After Xinjiang Officials Allege ‘Fake Archive’ • Will the EU-China investment agreement survive Parliament’s scrutiny? • Experts demand suspension of EU-China Investment Deal • Sweden is about to deport activist to China—Torture and prison be damned • EU-CHINA: Advocacy for the Uyghur issue • Who are the Uyghurs? Canadian scholars give profound insights • Huawei enables China’s grave human rights violations • It's 'Captive Nations Week' — here's why we should care • EU-China relations under the German presidency: is this “Europe’s moment”? • If EU wants rule of law in China, it must help 'dissident' lawyers • Happening in Europe, too • U.N. experts call call for decisive measures to protect fundamental freedoms in China • EU-China Summit: Europe can, and should hold China to account • China is the world’s greatest threat to religious freedom and other basic human rights
    [Show full text]
  • City of Merced Town Hall Goals & Priorities Survey 504 Total
    City of Merced Town Hall Goals & Priorities Survey 504 Total Responses 24:27 Average time to complete 1. Full Name - 471 Responses 2. Email address - 454 Responses 3. Phone Number – 428 Responses 4. Home Address – 426 Responses 5. Your City District District 1 41 District 2 23 District 3 50 District 4 99 District 5 50 District 6 111 Outside City Limits 32 Not Sure 62 6. The Merced City Council develops Goals & Priorities annually to guide budget development. Please indicate for each of the City of Merced's current Goals & Priorities it's importance to you from "Not At All Important" to "Very Important" Not At All Important Somewhat Important Important Fairly Important Very Important No Opinion Staffing Youth Programs City Beautification Local Streets Future Planning Economic Development Downtown Regional Transportation Sustainability Housing/Homelessness Community Wellness Agency Partnerships 7. City Staffing is tied directly to providing services to the community. Please indicate importance of fulfilling each service area staffing needs from "Not At All Important" to "Very Important". Not At All Important Somewhat Important Important Fairly Important Very Important No Opinion Police Department Code Enforcement Fire Department Parks and Greenspace Maintenance Street Improvements & Lighting Refuse Collection Water & Sewer Services Building Permits & Construction Parks & Recreation Services Economic Development (business & industrial) Airport Services Planning Services (code updates, entitlements) Affordable Housing Public Art Applegate Zoo 8. Parks & Recreation provides services to youth and adults within Merced. Please rank the current services provided by order of importance to you. Rank Options First choice Last choice 1. Family-friendly Events 2. Recreation Activities for children 5-12 3.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Global Media Footprint
    February 2021 SHARP POWER AND DEMOCRATIC RESILIENCE SERIES China’s Global Media Footprint Democratic Responses to Expanding Authoritarian Influence by Sarah Cook ABOUT THE SHARP POWER AND DEMOCRATIC RESILIENCE SERIES As globalization deepens integration between democracies and autocracies, the compromising effects of sharp power—which impairs free expression, neutralizes independent institutions, and distorts the political environment—have grown apparent across crucial sectors of open societies. The Sharp Power and Democratic Resilience series is an effort to systematically analyze the ways in which leading authoritarian regimes seek to manipulate the political landscape and censor independent expression within democratic settings, and to highlight potential civil society responses. This initiative examines emerging issues in four crucial arenas relating to the integrity and vibrancy of democratic systems: • Challenges to free expression and the integrity of the media and information space • Threats to intellectual inquiry • Contestation over the principles that govern technology • Leverage of state-driven capital for political and often corrosive purposes The present era of authoritarian resurgence is taking place during a protracted global democratic downturn that has degraded the confidence of democracies. The leading authoritarians are ABOUT THE AUTHOR challenging democracy at the level of ideas, principles, and Sarah Cook is research director for China, Hong Kong, and standards, but only one side seems to be seriously competing Taiwan at Freedom House. She directs the China Media in the contest. Bulletin, a monthly digest in English and Chinese providing news and analysis on media freedom developments related Global interdependence has presented complications distinct to China. Cook is the author of several Asian country from those of the Cold War era, which did not afford authoritarian reports for Freedom House’s annual publications, as regimes so many opportunities for action within democracies.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014-2015 Report on Police Violence in the Umbrella Movement
    ! ! ! ! ! 2014-2015 Report on Police Violence in the Umbrella Movement A report of the State Violence Database Project in Hong Kong Compiled by The Professional Commons and Hong Kong In-Media ! ! ! Table!of!Contents! ! About!us! ! About!the!research! ! Maps!/!Glossary! ! Executive!Summary! ! 1.! Report!on!physical!injury!and!mental!trauma!...........................................................................................!13! 1.1! Physical!injury!....................................................................................................................................!13! 1.1.1! Injury!caused!by!police’s!direct!smacking,!beating!and!disperse!actions!..................................!14! 1.1.2! Excessive!use!of!force!during!the!arrest!process!.......................................................................!24! 1.1.3! Connivance!at!violence,!causing!injury!to!many!.......................................................................!28! 1.1.4! Delay!of!rescue!and!assault!on!medical!volunteers!..................................................................!33! 1.1.5! Police’s!use!of!violence!or!connivance!at!violence!against!journalists!......................................!35! 1.2! Psychological!trauma!.........................................................................................................................!39! 1.2.1! Psychological!trauma!caused!by!use!of!tear!gas!by!the!police!..................................................!39! 1.2.2! Psychological!trauma!resulting!from!violence!...........................................................................!41!
    [Show full text]
  • 4.1 Potential Facilities List FY 17-18
    FY 2017-2018 Annual Report Permittee Name: City of San José Appendix 4.1 FAC # SIC Code Facility Name St Num Dir St Name St Type St Sub Type St Sub Num 820 7513 Ryder Truck Rental A 2481 O'Toole Ave 825 3471 Du All Anodizing Company A 730 Chestnut St 831 2835 BD Biosciences A 2350 Qume Dr 840 4111 Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Chaboya Division A 2240 S 7th St 841 5093 Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority - Cerone Division A 3990 Zanker Rd 849 5531 B & A Friction Materials, Inc. A 1164 Old Bayshore Hwy 853 3674 Universal Semiconductor A 1925 Zanker Rd 871 5511 Mercedes- Benz of Stevens Creek A 4500 Stevens Creek Blvd 877 7542 A.J. Auto Detailing, Inc. A 702 Coleman Ave 912 2038 Eggo Company A 475 Eggo Way 914 3672 Sanmina Corp Plant I A 2101 O'Toole Ave 924 2084 J. Lohr Winery A 1000 Lenzen Ave 926 3471 Applied Anodize, Inc. A 622 Charcot Ave Suite 933 3471 University Plating A 650 University Ave 945 3679 M-Pulse Microwave, Inc. A 576 Charcot Ave 959 3672 Sanmina Corp Plant II A 2068 Bering Dr 972 7549 San Jose Auto Steam Cleaning A 32 Stockton Ave 977 2819 Hill Bros. Chemical Co. A 410 Charcot Ave 991 3471 Quality Plating, Inc. A 1680 Almaden Expy Suite 1029 4231 Specialty Truck Parts Inc. A 1605 Industrial Ave 1044 2082 Gordon Biersch Brewing Company, Inc. A 357 E Taylor St 1065 2013 Mohawk Packing, Div. of John Morrell A 1660 Old Bayshore Hwy 1067 5093 GreenWaste Recovery, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeting the Anti- Extradition Bill Movement
    TARGETING THE ANTI- EXTRADITION BILL MOVEMENT China’s Hong Kong Messaging Proliferates on Social Media The Digital Forensic Research Lab (DFRLab) is a start-up incubated at the Atlantic Council and leading hub of digital forensic analysts whose mission is to identify, expose, and explain disinformation where and when it occurs. The DFRLab promotes the idea of objective truth as a foundation of governance to protect democratic institutions and norms from those who would undermine them. The Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security works to develop sustainable, nonpartisan strategies to address the most important security challenges facing the United States and the world. The Center honors General Brent Scowcroft’s legacy of service and embodies his ethos of nonpartisan commitment to the cause of security, support for US leadership in cooperation with allies and partners, and dedication to the mentorship of the next generation of leaders. The Scowcroft Center’s Asia Security Initiative promotes forward-looking strategies and con-structive solutions for the most pressing issues affecting the Indo- Pacific region, particularly the rise of China, in order to enhance cooperation between the United States and its regional allies and partners. COVER PHOTO (BACKGROUND): “Hong Kong Waterfront,” by Thom Masat (@tomterifx), Unsplash. Published on June 6, 2018. https://unsplash.com/photos/t_YWqXcK5lw This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Independence. The authors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council and its donors do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this issue brief’s conclusions.
    [Show full text]
  • Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020
    Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Nic Newman with Richard Fletcher, Anne Schulz, Simge Andı, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Supported by Surveyed by © Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism / Digital News Report 2020 4 Contents Foreword by Rasmus Kleis Nielsen 5 3.15 Netherlands 76 Methodology 6 3.16 Norway 77 Authorship and Research Acknowledgements 7 3.17 Poland 78 3.18 Portugal 79 SECTION 1 3.19 Romania 80 Executive Summary and Key Findings by Nic Newman 9 3.20 Slovakia 81 3.21 Spain 82 SECTION 2 3.22 Sweden 83 Further Analysis and International Comparison 33 3.23 Switzerland 84 2.1 How and Why People are Paying for Online News 34 3.24 Turkey 85 2.2 The Resurgence and Importance of Email Newsletters 38 AMERICAS 2.3 How Do People Want the Media to Cover Politics? 42 3.25 United States 88 2.4 Global Turmoil in the Neighbourhood: 3.26 Argentina 89 Problems Mount for Regional and Local News 47 3.27 Brazil 90 2.5 How People Access News about Climate Change 52 3.28 Canada 91 3.29 Chile 92 SECTION 3 3.30 Mexico 93 Country and Market Data 59 ASIA PACIFIC EUROPE 3.31 Australia 96 3.01 United Kingdom 62 3.32 Hong Kong 97 3.02 Austria 63 3.33 Japan 98 3.03 Belgium 64 3.34 Malaysia 99 3.04 Bulgaria 65 3.35 Philippines 100 3.05 Croatia 66 3.36 Singapore 101 3.06 Czech Republic 67 3.37 South Korea 102 3.07 Denmark 68 3.38 Taiwan 103 3.08 Finland 69 AFRICA 3.09 France 70 3.39 Kenya 106 3.10 Germany 71 3.40 South Africa 107 3.11 Greece 72 3.12 Hungary 73 SECTION 4 3.13 Ireland 74 References and Selected Publications 109 3.14 Italy 75 4 / 5 Foreword Professor Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Director, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (RISJ) The coronavirus crisis is having a profound impact not just on Our main survey this year covered respondents in 40 markets, our health and our communities, but also on the news media.
    [Show full text]
  • The Broad and Sustained Offensive on Human Rights That Started After President Xi Jinping Took Power Five Years Ago Showed No Sign of Abating in 2017
    JANUARY 2018 COUNTRY SUMMARY China The broad and sustained offensive on human rights that started after President Xi Jinping took power five years ago showed no sign of abating in 2017. The death of Nobel Peace Prize laureate Liu Xiaobo in a hospital under heavy guard in July highlighted the Chinese government’s deepening contempt for rights. The near future for human rights appears grim, especially as Xi is expected to remain in power at least until 2022. Foreign governments did little in 2017 to push back against China’s worsening rights record at home and abroad. The Chinese government, which already oversees one of the strictest online censorship regimes in the world, limited the provision of censorship circumvention tools and strengthened ideological control over education and mass media in 2017. Schools and state media incessantly tout the supremacy of the Chinese Communist Party, and, increasingly, of President Xi Jinping as “core” leader. Authorities subjected more human rights defenders—including foreigners—to show trials in 2017, airing excerpted forced confessions and court trials on state television and social media. Police ensured the detainees’ compliance by torturing some of them, denying them access to lawyers of their choice, and holding them incommunicado for months. In Xinjiang, a nominally autonomous region with 11 million Turkic Muslim Uyghurs, authorities stepped up mass surveillance and the security presence despite the lack of evidence demonstrating an organized threat. They also adopted new policies denying Uyghurs cultural and religious rights. Hong Kong’s human rights record took a dark turn. Hong Kong courts disqualified four pro-democracy lawmakers in July and jailed three prominent pro-democracy student leaders in August.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Notes Introduction 1. Hobsbawm 1990, 66. 2. Diamond 1998, 322–33. 3. Fairbank 1992, 44–45. 4. Fei Xiaotong 1989, 1–2. 5. Diamond 1998, 323, original emphasis. 6. Crossley 1999; Di Cosmo 1998; Purdue 2005a; Lavely and Wong 1998, 717. 7. Richards 2003, 112–47; Lattimore 1937; Pan Chia-lin and Taeuber 1952. 8. My usage of the term “geo-body” follows Thongchai 1994. 9. B. Anderson 1991, 86. 10. Purdue 2001, 304. 11. Dreyer 2006, 279–80; Fei Xiaotong 1981, 23–25. 12. Jiang Ping 1994, 16. 13. Morris-Suzuki 1998, 4; Duara 2003; Handler 1988, 6–9. 14. Duara 1995; Duara 2003. 15. Turner 1962, 3. 16. Adelman and Aron 1999, 816. 17. M. Anderson 1996, 4, Anderson’s italics. 18. Fitzgerald 1996a: 136. 19. Ibid., 107. 20. Tsu Jing 2005. 21. R. Wong 2006, 95. 22. Chatterjee (1986) was the first to theorize colonial nationalism as a “derivative discourse” of Western Orientalism. 23. Gladney 1994, 92–95; Harrell 1995a; Schein 2000. 24. Fei Xiaotong 1989, 1. 25. Cohen 1991, 114–25; Schwarcz 1986; Tu Wei-ming 1994. 26. Harrison 2000, 240–43, 83–85; Harrison 2001. 27. Harrison 2000, 83–85; Cohen 1991, 126. 186 • Notes 28. Duara 2003, 9–40. 29. See, for example, Lattimore 1940 and 1962; Forbes 1986; Goldstein 1989; Benson 1990; Lipman 1998; Millward 1998; Purdue 2005a; Mitter 2000; Atwood 2002; Tighe 2005; Reardon-Anderson 2005; Giersch 2006; Crossley, Siu, and Sutton 2006; Gladney 1991, 1994, and 1996; Harrell 1995a and 2001; Brown 1996 and 2004; Cheung Siu-woo 1995 and 2003; Schein 2000; Kulp 2000; Bulag 2002 and 2006; Rossabi 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional-Executive Commission on China Annual Report 2019
    CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA ANNUAL REPORT 2019 ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION NOVEMBER 18, 2019 Printed for the use of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ( Available via the World Wide Web: https://www.cecc.gov VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:38 Nov 18, 2019 Jkt 036743 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 5011 G:\ANNUAL REPORT\ANNUAL REPORT 2019\2019 AR GPO FILES\FRONTMATTER.TXT CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA ANNUAL REPORT 2019 ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION NOVEMBER 18, 2019 Printed for the use of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ( Available via the World Wide Web: https://www.cecc.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 36–743 PDF WASHINGTON : 2019 VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:38 Nov 18, 2019 Jkt 036743 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 G:\ANNUAL REPORT\ANNUAL REPORT 2019\2019 AR GPO FILES\FRONTMATTER.TXT CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA LEGISLATIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS House Senate JAMES P. MCGOVERN, Massachusetts, MARCO RUBIO, Florida, Co-chair Chair JAMES LANKFORD, Oklahoma MARCY KAPTUR, Ohio TOM COTTON, Arkansas THOMAS SUOZZI, New York STEVE DAINES, Montana TOM MALINOWSKI, New Jersey TODD YOUNG, Indiana BEN MCADAMS, Utah DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California CHRISTOPHER SMITH, New Jersey JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon BRIAN MAST, Florida GARY PETERS, Michigan VICKY HARTZLER, Missouri ANGUS KING, Maine EXECUTIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS Department of State, To Be Appointed Department of Labor, To Be Appointed Department of Commerce, To Be Appointed At-Large, To Be Appointed At-Large, To Be Appointed JONATHAN STIVERS, Staff Director PETER MATTIS, Deputy Staff Director (II) VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:38 Nov 18, 2019 Jkt 036743 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 0486 Sfmt 0486 G:\ANNUAL REPORT\ANNUAL REPORT 2019\2019 AR GPO FILES\FRONTMATTER.TXT C O N T E N T S Page I.
    [Show full text]
  • Xi Jinping and the 'Other' China by Peter Wood
    Volume 17, Issue 8 June 9, 2017 In a Fortnight: Xi Jinping and the 'Other' China By Peter Wood Xi Jinping Promotes Protégés to Top Positions in Run-Up to 19th Party Congress By Willy Lam The Southern Theater Command and China’s Maritime Strategy By Nan Li Recent Developments in the Chinese Army’s Helicopter Force By Dennis J. Blasko Waiting in the Wings: PLAAF General Yi Xiaoguang By Kenneth Allen and Jana Allen Xi Jinping and the 'Other' constitutes an important pillar of its domestic le- gitimacy. Not surprisingly, the CCP has launched China a propaganda push in state media to highlight its progress. At the end of May, China held its annual Chi- At the center of much of the attention is the nese Poverty Alleviation International Forum (中 “core” of the Party, Xi Jinping, whose experi- 国扶贫国际论坛), which serves to draw attention ences in the countryside as a young man, and to Chinese achievements in this area (Xinhua, major policies have been offered up as proof of May 26). Poverty alleviation is likely to remain a the Party’s continuing ties to regular people and key theme in state media as China prepares for its commitment to China’s urban and rural poor. the 19th Party Congress later this year. The Chi- nese Communist Party (CCP) has set for itself the Xi Jinping, in particular, is being lauded as a ma- ambitious goal of largely eradicating poverty by jor driver of these efforts. Xi has made sweeping 2020. Its previous success in moving large num- economic reform and the expansion of the bers of Chinese out of poverty—largely due to “moderately prosperous” class ( 小康) core Deng Xiaoping’s Reform and Opening policies— planks of his policies, particularly as embodied ChinaBrief June 9, 2017 in the “Four Comprehensives” (China Brief, Feb- ordinary Chinese, inequality is rising, and the ruary 23).
    [Show full text]
  • A China Strategy
    A CHINA STRATEGY Edward Lucas STRATEGY PAPER CEPA Strategy Paper | A China Strategy CONTENTS n an era of geopolitical competition, the West — the U.S.-led countries of Game of Thrones: Who Runs the World? ... 3 Ithe transatlantic alliance and their East Filling the Strategic Vacuum ........................ 6 Asian allies — lacks a strategy for dealing Learning and Doing ....................................... 7 with its most formidable competitor: the Counterarguments .......................................... 10 People’s Republic of China (henceforth Conclusion ........................................................ 11 China). But the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has a strategy for dealing with Endnotes ........................................................... 13 the West. It involves a long-term goal of “national rejuvenation”1 — making China the world’s most powerful country by 2050 — implemented with decisive ABOUT THE AUTHOR leadership; a clear-eyed appreciation of Western diplomatic, economic, political, Edward Lucas is a non-resident fellow at and social weaknesses; and effective the Center for European Policy Analysis means of exploiting them. These tactics, (CEPA). He has 40 years experience dealing best characterized as “sharp power,”2 with transatlantic and regional security, include censorship and manipulation of and edits the new China Influence Monitor, the information system, cyber operations, a weekly bulletin on China’s westward divide-and-rule diplomacy, leverage of footprint. trade and investment, and propaganda, plus military bluff and intimidation. Under Xi Jinping, the Chinese party-state has its most powerful leader and its most ABOUT CEPA centralized government since the Mao era. The Center for European Policy Analysis It has institutionalized ethnic and religious (CEPA) is a 501(c)(3), non-profit, non-partisan, persecution at home and developed public policy research institute.
    [Show full text]