Partnership for Urban South Hampshire (PUSH)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Partnership for Urban South Hampshire (PUSH) Partnership for Urban South Hampshire (PUSH) Strategic Habitat Regulation Assessment (HRA) of the South Hampshire Strategy INTERIM For Partnership for Urban South Hampshire (PUSH) Project Number: 11718 May 2016 Campbell Reith Hill LLP Raven House 29 Linkfield Lane Surrey RH1 1SS T: +44(0)1737 784500 F: +44(0)1737 784501 E: [email protected] W: www.campbellreith.com Partnership for Urban South Hampshire (PUSH) Strategic Habitat Regulations Assessment Document History and Status Revision Date Purpose/Statu File Ref Author Check Review s D1 06/11/2015 Draft AHah06112015 AH SMG SMG D2 12/04/2016 Draft AHah-11718- AH SMG SMG 120416- PUSHStrategicHab itatRegulationsAss essment-D2 D3 13/05/2016 D3 AHah-11718- AH SMG SMG 130516- PUSHStrategicHab itatRegulationsAss essment-D3 F1 20/05/16 F1 AHah-11718- AH SMG SMG 1200516- PUSHStrategicHab itatRegulationsAss essment-F1 This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of Campbell Reith Hill LLP’s (CampbellReith) appointment with its client and is subject to the terms of the appointment. It is addressed to and for the sole use and reliance of CampbellReith’s client. CampbellReith accepts no liability for any use of this document other than by its client and only for the purposes, stated in the document, for which it was prepared and provided. No person other than the client may copy (in whole or in part) use or rely on the contents of this document, without the prior written permission of Campbell Reith Hill LLP. Any advice, opinions, or recommendations within this document should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document as a whole. The contents of this document are not to be construed as providing legal, business or tax advice or opinion. © Campbell Reith Hill LLP 2016 Document Details Last saved 20/05/2016 09:40 Path AHah-11718-200516-PUSHStrategicHabitatRegulationsAssessment-F1 Author Alice Hoy Project Partner David Innes Project Number 11718 Project Name PUSH Spatial Strategy Structural Civil Environmental Geotechnical Transportation AHah-11718-200516-PUSHStrategicHabitatRegulationsAssessment-F1.docx i Partnership for Urban South Hampshire (PUSH) Strategic Habitat Regulations Assessment Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Methodology .............................................................................................................................8 3.0 Baseline Study: PUSH area and European Sites ............................................................................10 4.0 European Sites: Impacts and Receptors ......................................................................................23 5.0 Screening ................................................................................................................................. 30 6.0 Consideration of European Designated Sites ................................................................................41 7.0 PUSH Spatial strategy options European Designated Site Appraisal ................................................ 43 8.0 Mitigation ................................................................................................................................. 47 9.0 Conclusions .............................................................................................................................. 54 Appendices Appendix A: PUSH Boundary Appendix B: JNCC Data forms Appendix C: HRA-lite screening-out process Tables Table 1: European Designated Sites within and surrounding the PUSH boundary as outline in the spatial strategy ............................................................................................................................................. 10 Table 2: European Sites screened out in 2009 HRA work in the PUSH region ........................................... 22 Table 3: Air Pollutants and Effects ....................................................................................................... 23 Table 4: Coastal Management Defence Strategies ................................................................................. 25 Table 5: Vulnerabilities for each European Designated Site within the PUSH area ..................................... 27 Table 6: Vulnerabilities for each European Designated site within a 20km radius of the PUSH boundary ..... 28 Table 7: Vulnerabilities outside the 20km radius of the PUSH boundary but still likely to be affected by the PSS. .................................................................................................................................................. 28 Table 8: PUSH policies and associated potential environmental impacts .................................................. 34 Table 9: In-combination effects screening matrix .................................................................................. 40 Table 10: Screened-out sites listed outside of the 20km PUSH radius and sites considered for further screening ........................................................................................................................................... 41 Table 11: Potential Effects and on Screened-in European Sites ............................................................... 42 Table 12: High-level mitigation measures ............................................................................................. 47 AHah-11718-200516-PUSHStrategicHabitatRegulationsAssessment-F1.docx ii Partnership for Urban South Hampshire (PUSH) Strategic Habitat Regulations Assessment ABBREVIATIONS Acronym Abbreviation AA Appropriate Assessment EcIA Ecological Impact Assessment Ha Hectares Interim Solent Recreation Mitigation ISRMS Strategy NPPF National Planning Policy Framework PP Precautionary Principle PSS PUSH: Spatial Strategy Partnership for Urban South PUSH Hampshire SA Sustainability Appraisal SA Sustainability Appraisal SAC Special Area of Conservation SCI Site of Community Importance SE Plan South East Plan SHRA Strategic Habitat Risk Assessment SPA Special Protected Areas WwTW Wastewater Treatment Works SRMP Solent Recreation Mitigation Strategy NMP National Mitigation Plan iSRMS Interim Solent Management Strategy NE Natural England PR19 Price Review Package AHah-11718-200516-PUSHStrategicHabitatRegulationsAssessment-F1.docx iii Partnership for Urban South Hampshire (PUSH) Strategic Habitat Regulations Assessment 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1. Overview 1.1.1. Campbell Reith Hill LLP (herein referred to as CampbellReith) have been appointed by the Partnership for Urban South Hampshire (PUSH) to undertake a Strategic Habitat Regulations Assessment (SHRA) in order to assist the process of a spatial strategy for the PUSH region regarding European sites. The guidelines for HRAs have been adopted in order to provide a high level document that will accompany the PUSH Spatial Strategy in order to identify constraints during early stages of planning 1.1.2. Habitat Regulation Assessments are a legal obligation when proposing development within European-designated sites. European designated sites, such as Special Areas of Conservation (SAC), Special Protection Areas (SPA) and RAMSAR sites are afforded strict protection under the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 (as amended)1. The HRA provides an assessment in identifying any likely significant effects on the European Sites; comprising of screening, scoping and assessing mitigation measures of the site alongside associated policy and legislation to determine the appropriateness of development and validation of site. If any significant effects are identified within the region on EU Designated Sites, full mitigation and avoidance measures will be determined. 1.1.3. The PUSH Spatial Strategy proposes the development of housing whilst encouraging employment which increases recreational pressures; discharging into water courses; noise and air pollution; and disturbance of species and habitats. As the region spreads over many boundaries, PUSH provides coordination between authorities whereby they would often require separate consent. The PUSH boundary can be found in Appendix B. The PUSH Spatial Strategy is a non-statutory document, providing a strategy as opposed to a development plan. The SHRA will assist the Spatial Strategies as constraints can be identified early during the initial stages of proposed development to determine any significant impacts to the European Designated Sites. This adapted Habitat Regulations Assessment will hereafter be referred to as the ‘Strategic Habitat Regulations Assessment’ (SHRA). 1.1.4. This SHRA applies to the PUSH Spatial Strategy Draft Report (2015) 2 . As advised by the Guidance on competent authority coordination under the Habitats Regulations (2012)3 ; the HRA-lite Technical Report4, published in September 2012 by Lepus Consulting has been used as a baseline for this report. 1.1.5. The structure and output of this SHRA is as follows: Assess the background of the SRHA Provide an overview on the PUSH Spatial Strategy and SE Plan Methodology process for the adapted SHRA Undertake a baseline study for European Sites, Local Policy HRA’s and previously screened sites 1 Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations (2010) http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2010/490/contents/made 2 G L Hearn (December, 2015) South Hampshire Spatial Strategy: Draft for Consultation, Partnership for Urban South Hampshire. 3 DEFRA (2012) Guidance on competent authority coordination
Recommended publications
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment June 2021
    Horsham Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Horsham District Council July 2021 Horsham Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Damiano Weitowitz James Riley Max Wade James Riley Consultant Ecologist Technical Director Technical Director Technical Director Isla Hoffmann Heap Senior Ecologist Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position 0 13/10/20 Emerging draft JR James Riley Technical to inform plan Director development 1 18/12/20 Updated to JR James Riley Technical assess Director Regulation 19 LP. 2 15/01/2021 Update JR James Riley Technical following client Director comments 3 30/06/21 Further update JR James Riley Technical Director Distribution List # Hard Copies PDF Required Association / Company Name Prepared for: Horsham District Council AECOM Horsham Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Prepared for: Horsham District Council Prepared by: AECOM Limited Midpoint, Alencon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP United Kingdom T: +44(0)1256 310200 aecom.com © 2021 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared for: Horsham District Council AECOM Horsham Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Table of Contents Executive Summary........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Puddletown Neighbourhood Plan
    Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Puddletown Neighbourhood Plan Scoping Report Puddletown Area Parish Council October 2018 Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Scoping Report Puddletown Neighbourhood Plan October 2018 Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Cheryl Beattie Alastair Peattie Nick Chisholm-Batten Environmental Planner Associate Associate Revision History Revision Revision date Details Name Position V4 5th Oct 2018 Consultation version Nick Chisholm-Batten Associate Prepared for: Puddletown Area Parish Council Prepared by: AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited 3rd Floor, Portwall Place Portwall Lane Bristol BS1 6NA United Kingdom T: +44 117 901 7000 aecom.com © 2018 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) in accordance with its contract with Locality (the “Client”) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. AECOM shall have no liability to any third party that makes use of or relies upon this document. Prepared for: Puddletown Area Parish Council AECOM Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Scoping Report Puddletown Neighbourhood Plan October 2018 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A-Razowski X.Vp:Corelventura
    Acta zoologica cracoviensia, 46(3): 269-275, Kraków, 30 Sep., 2003 Reassessment of forewing pattern elements in Tortricidae (Lepidoptera) Józef RAZOWSKI Received: 15 March, 2003 Accepted for publication: 20 May, 2003 RAZOWSKI J. 2003. Reassessment of forewing pattern elements in Tortricidae (Lepidop- tera). Acta zoologica cracoviensia, 46(3): 269-275. Abstract. Forewing pattern elements of moths in the family Tortricidae are discussed and characterized. An historical review of the terminology is provided. A new system of nam- ing pattern elements is proposed. Key words. Lepidoptera, Tortricidae, forewing pattern, analysis, terminology. Józef RAZOWSKI, Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, S³awkowska 17, 31-016 Kraków, Poland. E-mail: razowski.isez.pan.krakow.pl I. INTRODUCTION Early tortricid workers such as HAWORTH (1811), HERRICH-SCHHÄFFER (1856), and others pre- sented the first terminology for forewing pattern elements in their descriptions of new species. Nearly a century later, SÜFFERT (1929) provided a more eclectic discussion of pattern elements for Lepidoptera in general. In recent decades, the common and repeated use of specific terms in de- scriptions and illustrations by FALKOVITSH (1966), DANILEVSKY and KUZNETZOV (1968), and oth- ers reinforced these terms in Tortricidae. BRADLEY et al. (1973) summarized and commented on all the English terms used to describe forewing pattern elements. DANILEVSKY and KUZNETZOV (1968) and KUZNETZOV (1978) analyzed tortricid pattern elements, primarily Olethreutinae, dem- onstrating the taxonomic significance of the costal strigulae in that subfamily. For practical pur- poses they numbered the strigulae from the forewing apex to the base, where the strigulae often become indistinct. KUZNETZOV (1978) named the following forewing elements in Tortricinae: ba- sal fascia, subterminal fascia, outer fascia (comprised of subapical blotch and outer blotch), apical spot, and marginal line situated in the marginal fascia (a component of the ground colour).
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer.Doc Revised from 10/03/02
    Save No. 91 Printed 10/03/02 10:33 AM Gazetteer.doc Revised From 10/03/02 Gazetteer compiled by E J Wiseman Abbots Ann SU 3243 Bighton Lane Watercress Beds SU 5933 Abbotstone Down SU 5836 Bishop's Dyke SU 3405 Acres Down SU 2709 Bishopstoke SU 4619 Alice Holt Forest SU 8042 Bishops Sutton Watercress Beds SU 6031 Allbrook SU 4521 Bisterne SU 1400 Allington Lane Gravel Pit SU 4717 Bitterne (Southampton) SU 4413 Alresford Watercress Beds SU 5833 Bitterne Park (Southampton) SU 4414 Alresford Pond SU 5933 Black Bush SU 2515 Amberwood Inclosure SU 2013 Blackbushe Airfield SU 8059 Amery Farm Estate (Alton) SU 7240 Black Dam (Basingstoke) SU 6552 Ampfield SU 4023 Black Gutter Bottom SU 2016 Andover Airfield SU 3245 Blackmoor SU 7733 Anton valley SU 3740 Blackmoor Golf Course SU 7734 Arlebury Lake SU 5732 Black Point (Hayling Island) SZ 7599 Ashlett Creek SU 4603 Blashford Lakes SU 1507 Ashlett Mill Pond SU 4603 Blendworth SU 7113 Ashley Farm (Stockbridge) SU 3730 Bordon SU 8035 Ashley Manor (Stockbridge) SU 3830 Bossington SU 3331 Ashley Walk SU 2014 Botley Wood SU 5410 Ashley Warren SU 4956 Bourley Reservoir SU 8250 Ashmansworth SU 4157 Boveridge SU 0714 Ashurst SU 3310 Braishfield SU 3725 Ash Vale Gravel Pit SU 8853 Brambridge SU 4622 Avington SU 5332 Bramley Camp SU 6559 Avon Castle SU 1303 Bramshaw Wood SU 2516 Avon Causeway SZ 1497 Bramshill (Warren Heath) SU 7759 Avon Tyrrell SZ 1499 Bramshill Common SU 7562 Backley Plain SU 2106 Bramshill Police College Lake SU 7560 Baddesley Common SU 3921 Bramshill Rubbish Tip SU 7561 Badnam Creek (River
    [Show full text]
  • New Forest Wetland Management Plan 2006
    LIFE 02 NAT/UK/8544 New Forest Wetland Management Plan Plate 1 Dry stream bed of Fletchers Brook - August 2005 3.18 LIFE 02 NAT/UK/8544 New Forest Wetland Management Plan Table 3-8: Flow Statistics Lymington Hampshire Avon (R. Lymington Tributaries at Brockenhurst) (Dockens Water) Catchment Size 98.9 km2 17.15 km2 Permeability Mixed permeability Low to Mixed permeability Mean Annual rainfall (1961-90) 854 mm 831 mm Elevation 8.4-117.7m - Mean flow 1.06 m3s-1 0.26 m3s-1 95% exceedance (Q95) 0.052 m3s-1 0.047 m3s-1 10% exceedance (Q10) 2.816 m3s-1 0.592 m3s-1 Source: Centre of Ecology & Hydrology 3.4.5 Flow patterns Flow patterns are characterised by glides (slow flowing water), riffles (medium flowing water) and runs (fast flowing water). Life 3 studies in the Blackwater and Highland Water sub-catchments found that glides tend be to the most common form of flow followed by riffles and runs. Pools (still water) are noticeably rare in modified reaches being replaced by glides or runs. Pools where they occur are usually found at meander bends apices. Cascades and small water falls also occur at the faces of debris dams. Channelisation tends to affect the flow type in that it reduces the number of pools. Dominant flow types for the Highland Water and Black Water are shown in Figure 10. It is probable that a similar pattern would be found in the other river catchments. 3.4.6 Bank & bed material Bank material is made up of clay, fines, sand and gravel.
    [Show full text]
  • Landowner Deposits Register
    Register of Landowner Deposits under Highways Act 1980 and Commons Act 2006 The first part of this register contains entries for all CA16 combined deposits received since 1st October 2013, and these all have scanned copies of the deposits attached. The second part of the register lists entries for deposits made before 1st October 2013, all made under section 31(6) of the Highways Act 1980. There are a large number of these, and the only details given here currently are the name of the land, the parish and the date of the deposit. We will be adding fuller details and scanned documents to these entries over time. List of deposits made - last update 12 January 2017 CA16 Combined Deposits Deposit Reference: 44 - Land at Froyle (The Mrs Bootle-Wilbrahams Will Trust) Link to Documents: http://documents.hants.gov.uk/countryside/Deposit44-Bootle-WilbrahamsTrustLand-Froyle-Scan.pdf Details of Depositor Details of Land Crispin Mahony of Savills on behalf of The Parish: Froyle Mrs Bootle-WilbrahamWill Trust, c/o Savills (UK) Froyle Jewry Chambers,44 Jewry Street, Winchester Alton Hampshire Hampshire SO23 8RW GU34 4DD Date of Statement: 14/11/2016 Grid Reference: 733.416 Deposit Reference: 98 - Tower Hill, Dummer Link to Documents: http://documents.hants.gov.uk/rightsofway/Deposit98-LandatTowerHill-Dummer-Scan.pdf Details of Depositor Details of Land Jamie Adams & Madeline Hutton Parish: Dummer 65 Elm Bank Gardens, Up Street Barnes, Dummer London Basingstoke SW13 0NX RG25 2AL Date of Statement: 27/08/2014 Grid Reference: 583. 458 Deposit Reference:
    [Show full text]
  • Coarse Fishing Close Season on English Rivers
    Coarse fishing close season on English rivers Appendix 1 – Current coarse fish close season arrangements The close season on different waters In England, there is a coarse fish close season on all rivers, some canals and some stillwaters. This has not always been the case. In the 1990s, only around 60% of the canal network had a close season and in some regions, the close season had been dispensed with on all stillwaters. Stillwaters In 1995, following consultation, government confirmed a national byelaw which retained the coarse fish close season on rivers, streams, drains and canals, but dispensed with it on most stillwaters. The rationale was twofold: • Most stillwaters are discrete waterbodies in single ownership. Fishery owners can apply bespoke angling restrictions to protect their stocks, including non-statutory close times. • The close season had been dispensed with on many stillwaters prior to 1995 without apparent detriment to those fisheries. This presented strong evidence in favour of removing it. The close season is retained on some Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) and the Norfolk and Suffolk Broads, as a precaution against possible damage to sensitive wildlife - see Appendix 1. This consultation is not seeking views on whether the close season should be retained on these stillwaters While most stillwater fishery managers have not re-imposed their own close season rules, some have, either adopting the same dates as apply to rivers or tailoring them to their waters' specific needs. Canals The Environment Agency commissioned a research project in 1997 to examine the evidence around the close season on canals to identify whether or not angling during the close season was detrimental to canal fisheries.
    [Show full text]
  • 19 Duncton to Bignor Escarpment SAC
    Submitted to Client: Submitted by: South Downs National Park AECOM Authority Midpoint Alençon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP United Kingdom South Downs National Park Authority Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment July 2018 AECOM South Downs National Park Authority Page ii Prepared by: Isla Hoffmann Heap Checked by: Dr James Riley Senior Ecologist Technical Director Approved by: Dr James Riley Associate Director Rev No Comments Checked Approved Date by by 0 DRAFT IHH JR 05/05/17 1 Following client comments IHH JR 30/06/17 2 Incorporating air quality impact assessment IHH JR 01/08/17 3 Updated to address Pre-Submission Local Plan and IHH JR 13/09/17 incorporate air quality analysis for Ashdown Forest SAC 4 Update to reflect Consultation Comments and policy update IHH JR 16/03/18 5 New report produced in response to Sweetman European MK JR 24/07/18 Court of Justice ruling Midpoint, Alençon Link, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG21 7PP, United Kingdom Telephone: 01256 310 200 Website: http://www.aecom.com July 2018 Limitations South Downs National Park Authority Local Plan Habitats Regulations July 2018 Assessment AECOM South Downs National Park Authority Page iii AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of the South Downs National Park Authority (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by AECOM. This Report is confidential and may not be disclosed by the Client nor relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM.
    [Show full text]
  • 59 EDITORIAL. VOL. XVIII, Pt. 2, of the Proceedings Will Be Published In
    PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS " 59 EDITORIAL. OL. XVIII, Pt. 2, of the Proceedings will be published in July, 1953. It is hoped that this volume, which will include Vreviews of books received since 1950, notes of Field Meetings, and a list of those periodicals on the H.F.C. exchange list, will bring the Proceedings up to date, e.g., up to the end of 1952. Material intended for publication should be sent to the Hon. Editor, 10 The Close, Winchester. CORRESPONDENCE. THE STEAM PLOUGH IN HAMPSHIRE. Mr. Frank Warren writes concerning Mr. FusselFs article (Vol. XVII, p. 286) : " Richard Stratton of Broad Hinton, and Salthrop, Wiltshire (who lies buried in Winchester Cemetery), bought in 1859 the first Fowler steam plough for use on his farms. His son, James Stratton, came to farm Chilcombe, Winchester, in 1866 and introduced steam ploughing to Hampshire." CORRECTION. In the article on Hampshire Drawings in the Bodleian Library, Oxford, published in the Hampshire' Field Club Proceedings, Vol. XVII, page 139, the reference to the manuscript album should be " Western MSS. 17,507." PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS 71 SUBJECT SECRETARIES' REPORTS. BIOLOGICAL SECTION. Weather 1951. " Deplorable" seems to be the only suitable adjective to describe the meteorological setting of the year 1951. Only once in the whole year, on July 2nd, did the temperature reach 80°, and on 18th, 20th and 28th of that month 79°. The highest shade temperatures in any other months were 75'5° on April 25th, 75° on September 6th, 74° on two days in June, the 5th and 21st, and on August 1st.
    [Show full text]
  • Winchester District Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Scoping Report
    Winchester City Council Winchester District Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Scoping Report Final report Prepared by LUC July 2020 Winchester City Council Winchester District Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Scoping Report Project Number 11113 Version Status Prepared Checked Approved Date 1. Draft for client comment K. Sydney T. Livingston T. Livingston 26.06.2020 2. Final for consultation K. Sydney T. Livingston T. Livingston 07.07.2020 Bristol Land Use Consultants Ltd Landscape Design Edinburgh Registered in England Strategic Planning & Assessment Glasgow Registered number 2549296 Development Planning Lancaster Registered office: Urban Design & Masterplanning London 250 Waterloo Road Environmental Impact Assessment Manchester London SE1 8UL Landscape Planning & Assessment Landscape Management landuse.co.uk 100% recycled paper Ecology Historic Environment GIS & Visualisation Contents Winchester District Local Plan HRA Scoping Report July 2020 Contents Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Background to the Local Plan 1 The requirement to undertake Habitats Regulations Assessment of Development Plans 2 Stages of HRA 2 Recent case law changes 4 Previous HRA work 5 Structure of this report 5 Chapter 2 Approach to HRA 6 Screening methodology 6 Appropriate Assessment 9 Chapter 3 Scope of HRA 11 European sites that may be affected by the Local Plan 11 Potential broad impacts from the Local Plan 18 Chapter 4 Next Steps 21 Appendix A Attributes of European Sites with the potential to be affected by the Local Plan A-1 Appendix B Other plans and projects with the potential for in-combination effects B-1 LUC I i -Chapter 1 Introduction Winchester District Local Plan HRA Scoping Report July 2020 Chapter 1 Introduction An introduction to Habitats Regulations Assessment and the Winchester District Local Plan LUC has been commissioned by Winchester City Council to carry out a Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) of its emerging Local Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • 120. Wealden Greensand Area Profile: Supporting Documents
    National Character 120. Wealden Greensand Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 120. Wealden Greensand Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment 1 2 3 White Paper , Biodiversity 2020 and the European Landscape Convention , we are North revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas (NCAs). These are areas East that share similar landscape characteristics, and which follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision- Yorkshire making framework for the natural environment. & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform their West decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a landscape East scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage broader Midlands partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will also help West Midlands to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. East of England Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key London drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental Opportunity (SEOs) are South East suggested, which draw on this integrated information. The SEOs offer guidance South West on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution to the Knowledge of Lepidoptera Fauna of Lampedusa
    Journal Journal of Entomological of Entomological and and Acarological Acarological Research Research 2019; 2012; volume volume 51:8031 44:e ENTOMOLOGY Contribution to the knowledge of Lepidoptera fauna of Lampedusa: Bifascioides leucomelanella (Rebel, 1917) and Ceutholopha isidis (Zeller, 1867) (Lepidoptera) new to Italy M. Pinzari,1 M. Pinzari2 1Department of Biology, University of Roma Tor Vergata, Rome: 2Amateur entomologist, Rome, Italy (Pinzari, 2016b; Pinzari & Pinzari, 2019a,b; Pinzari et al., Abstract 2018b) and biology (Pinzari & Sbordoni, 2013; Pinzari, 2016a, 2019; Pinzari et al., 2017, 2018a, 2019, 2019a) of Lepidoptera in For the first time, 13 species are reported for the Lepidoptera Italy are still scarcely known. Recently, the survey has also been fauna of Lampedusa Island. Bifascioides leucomelanella and extended to the southern Italy and isles leading results that Ceutolopha isidis are new to Italy. The presence of Azanus ubaldus prompt further investigation. is confirmed. During a short surveyonly on Lepidoptera fauna in Lampedusa we collected a few species that are still unknown for the island. Although short surveys lead to the collection of few specimens Introduction and species, however they can reveal interesting species of bio- geographicuse relevance (e.g., Acleris lorquiniana (Duponchel, 1835), rare species in Italy, Pinzari & Pinzari, 2013; Scythris Research on Lepidoptera fauna in Central Italy has been car- clavella (Zeller, 1855), new to Peninsular Italy, Pinzari, 2016; ried out for many years and showed how much the fauna Clepsis peritana (Clemens, 1860), an alien species, Pinzari et al., 2018) and give an important contribution in shaping their distribu- tion in Italy. Correspondence: Manuela Pinzari, Department of Biology, University In this framework, we report the species newly recorded for Tor Vergata of Rome, via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
    [Show full text]