The Changing Role of Parliament in the Budget Process

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Changing Role of Parliament in the Budget Process An International Symposium for Chairpersons of Parliamentary Budget Committees of OECD Member countries HOLDING THE EXECUTIVE ACCOUNTABLE : THE CHANGING ROLE OF PARLIAMENT IN THE BUDGET PROCESS 24-25 January 2001 Palais du Luxembourg The Finance Committee of the French Senate TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................ 5 FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................. 7 I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 9 I. Opening Remarks, by Mr. Alain Lambert, President, Finance Commission, French Senate ................................................................................................................................. 9 2. Are Control and Support Incompatible? by Mr. Christian Poncelet, President, French Senate ................................................................................................................................. 10 3. Legislatures are a Vital Part of the Budget Process, by Mr. Donald Johnston, Secretary-General of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)............................................................................................................................... 1 1 11. PARLIAMENT, DEMOCRACY AND THE ROLE OF THE BUDGET PROCESS ........... 15 I. Keynote Address, by Mr. Luciano Violante, President, Italian Chamber of Deputies............. 15 2. Can National Legislatures Regain an Eflective Voice in Budget Policy? by Mr. Allen Schick, Maryland University, United States.... .... ... ..... .. .. .. ... ... ... ... .. .. .. .. 20 111. WHAT DO PARLIAMENTS NEED FOR EFFECTIVE OVERSIGHT? .......................... 45 I. The budget process in the Swedish Riksdag: Expectations and Experiences fiom the Reforms in the 1990s, by Mr. Mats Odell, Vice-Chair, Finance Committee, Swedish Parliament ........................................................................................................................ 45 2. What Do Parliaments Need for Effective Oversight on the Budgetary Planning and Execution? by Mr. Che Shik Chang, Chair, Special Committee on Budget and Accounts, Korean National Assembly ..................................................................................50 3. Making MPs Work for Our Money, by Mr. Edward Davey, Member, Treasury Select Committee, United Kingdom House of Commons.................................................................. 53 4. Planning Framework, Purposes and Content of Legislative Decisions, by Mr. Augusto Fantozzi, President, Budget Committee, Italian Chamber of Deputies............... 100 IV. ACCOUNTABILITY, AUDITS AND NEW MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES ................. 103 I. Budgets Should Take More Account of the Future, by Mr. Geert Van Manen, Secretary-General, Ministry of Finance, The Netherlands, and Chairman, OECD Working Party of Senior Budget Oflcials............................................................................. 103 2. Audit Agencies and their Relations to Legislatures, by Ms. Maria Kaisa Ada, Chair, Committee on Finance, Finnish Parliament......................................................................... 109 3. The Case of Hungary, by Mr. Imre Szekeres, Chair, Finance Committee, Hungarian Parliament .......................................................................................................................1 14 4. The EU Constraints Impacts, by Mr. Giorgio Benvenuto, President, Finance Committee, Italian Chamber of Deputies.............................................................................. 1 18 V. MULTILATERAL SURVEILLANCE OF PUBLIC FINANCE AND POLITICAL POWER................................................................................................................................. 121 I. International Multilateral Surveillance of Public Finance and Political Power, by Mr. Michel Bouvier, University of Paris I - Panthe'on-Sorbonne........................................... 121 2. The European Budget: the Role of the European Parliament, by Mr. Terence Wynn, Chair, Committee on Budgets, European Union Parliament. ................................................ 129 VI. CAN PARLIAMENT IMPROVE THEIR BUDGETARY OVERSIGHT? RECENT CHANGES ............................................................................................................ 135 I. Holding the Executive Accountable. by Mr. Alain Lambert. President. Finance Commmission. French Senate ............................................................................................. 135 2. Parliamentary Process for Budget Approval and Control in Spain by Mr. Joaquin Almunia. President. Committee on Budget. Spanish Chamber of Deputies .............................................................................................................................. 139 CONCLUSIONS .......................................................................................................................147 A. CONFERENCE STATEMENT ..........................................................................................147 B. CLOSING REMARKS....................................................................................................... 148 by Mr. Alain Lambert. President. Finance Commission. French Senate MINUTES OF THE CONFERENCE ........................................................................................ 151 ANNEXES .................................................................................................................................. 179 I . Annotated Agenda................................................................................................................ 179 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This book is based on the first meeting of the Presidents of OECD Member Country parliamentary budget committees, 24-25 January 2001. It is the sum of the collective efforts of the delegates to the conference. The OECD would like to thank M. Alain Lambert, President of the Commissions des finances, SCnat de la RCpublique franqaise, for his vision in conceiving the need for this work and his generosity in hosting the meeting. The OECD would also like to thank the staff and services of the SCnat, especially Fabrice Robert, CCline Finon and Alain Hortal for their hard work and support. Many thanks also to ElsaPilichowski, Mike Ruffner, HClkneLeconte and Jennifer Gardner of the OECD for their diligence in co-ordinating and organising the meeting. Finally, a special thank you to Allen Schick for his keen insights and unique contribution. The OECD has translated the original texts as follows : - in french : speeches by Ms. Aula, Mrs. Violante, Odell, Chang, Davey, Fantozzi, Van Maanen, Szekeres, Benvenuto and Wynn ; - in english : speeches by Mrs Poncelet, Lambert and Bouvier ; - the spanish text by Mr. Almunia has been translated in both languages. FOREWORD The first Symposium of the Chairpersons of Parliamentary Budget Committees of OECD countries, at the dawn of the 21st century, constituted a step towards the regaining of budget powers by the legislatures of the major industrial democracies. The manner in which the symposium came about is enlightening. On the one hand, the Public Management Service of the OECD had promoted the idea of such a meeting, which it considered necessary, given that Senior Budget Officials have been convening in that forum for many years. On the other hand, Alain Lambert, Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, had been working towards a reform of the budget process in France, as had Laurent Fabius and Didier Migaud in the National Assembly. Thus the OECD recognised the beginnings of a comeback of parliaments to the budgetary stage, whilst the Senate of the French Republic took a hand in the process. Fittingly, this symposium took place in the Palais du Luxembourg. The record of its proceedings and work follows. The role of parliaments in the budget process is a difficult one. It is fundamental, since the original purpose of parliaments has often been to sanction the levy of taxes in the name of the peoples they represent. Parliaments must be sufficiently informed in order to authorise government expenditures and revenues knowledgeably. But they must play no part in the management of government finance. Parliaments must oversee the action of governments but let responsibility rest with them. A clear definition of the budget role of parliament was the goal of the legislators and budget executives taking part in the symposium. I - INTRODUCTION 1. OPENING REMARKS by Mr. Alain Lambert, President, Finance Commission, French Senate I am very pleased and honoured to introduce the work of the first Symposium of the Chairpersons of Parliamentary Budget Committees of OECD Member countries. I am pleased first of all because the OECD is an organisation that habitually hosts meetings involving the executives of the major industrial democracies, but rarely Parliaments. That is why, Mr. Secretary-General, when you proposed to me that we host this first symposium, on the initiative of your Public Management Service, I accepted enthusiastically. I would therefore like to express my warm thanks to Donald Johnston, who will shortly be describing to us the subject of our work. I am also pleased because I take a special interest in the subject on which our work will be focusing during these two days, as it lies at the very
Recommended publications
  • International Press Conference with Minister for Finance Anders Borg
    2010 Press release 03 September 2010 Ministry of Finance International press conference with Minister for Finance Anders Borg Due to great demand from the international media, Anders Borg invites foreign journalists to a press conference on the Swedish economy, the financial troubles in Europe and his view of the Swedish election campaign, to be held on 8 September. The press conference will be held in English. Mr Borg will be available afterwards for brief interviews. The press conference will be held in English. Please note that accreditation is required - apply to [email protected] before 17.00 on Monday 6 September. Please bring your press credentials. We look forward to seeing you. Time and place 14.00 on 8 September 2010 International Press Centre, Fredsgatan 6, Stockholm. Contact Anna Charlotta Johansson Press Secretary +46 8 405 10 00 Markus Sjöqvist Press Secretary to Anders Borg +46 8 405 10 00 Press release 23 July 2010 Ministry of Finance European stress test shows good results for Swedish banks The Committee of European Banking Supervisors (CEBS) has in cooperation with the national supervisory authorities conducted a stress test on European banks, among these four Swedish banks. The results confirm previous Swedish stress tests. The Ministry of Finance acknowledges the outcome of the EU-wide stress test and supports this joint effort. "It is pleasing that we have been able to convey the traditional Swedish policy of openness and transparency. The publication of the stress test results, also for individual banks, is very important in order to restore confidence in the European banking system," says Minister for Finance Anders Borg.
    [Show full text]
  • Simona Koria
    Swedish National Election Studies Department of Political Science Report University of Gothenburg 2020.03.19 2020:2 www.snes.gu.se Voter perceptions of policy outcomes and responsibility attributions 2010-2018 Simona Koria Ylva Larsson Valforskningsprogrammets rapportserie Sedan 1950-talet genomför forskare knutna till Valforskningsprogrammet i Göteborg empiri- ska undersökningar av hur den svenska demokratin mår och utvecklas. Rapportserien är vår viktigaste publikationskanal för att bidra till samhällets kunskapsförsörjning på demokrati- området. Målsättningen är att sprida grundläggande fakta och forskningsresultat som rör val och väljarbeteende till en bred publik av forskare, studenter, journalister, politiker och allmän- het. The Swedish National Election Studies Program working report series Since the 1950s, the researchers associated with the Swedish National Election Studies Program at the Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, conducts empirical research on the well-being and development of the Swedish democracy. The working report series is one of our main publication outlets. The aim is to publish basic facts and research results about elections and voting behavior to a broad audience of researchers, students, journalists, politi- cians and the public. Party abbreviation = Left Party (V) = Social Democratic Party (S) = Green Party (MP) = Center Party (C) = The Liberals (L) = Conservative Party (M) = Christian Democratic Party (KD) = Sweden Democrats (SD) Citation: Simona Koria & Ylva Larsson (2020). Voter
    [Show full text]
  • Facts and Figures
    FACTS & FIGURES, SWEDISH GOVERNMENT OFFICES, YEARBOOK FACTS & FIGURES, SWEDISH GOVERNMENT OFFICES YEARBOOK 2007 presents facts and statistics about the organisation, duties and activities Facts & Figures of the Government Offices in 2007. In 2007 the Government Offices comprised the Prime Minister’s Office, twelve ministries and the Office for Administrative Affairs. Swedish Government Offices The yearbook contains statistics on decisions taken during the year, government bills submitted to the Swedish parliament, committee Yearbook 2007 reports, as well as a presentation of the the Cabinet line up and details of the Government Offices’ staff and finances. In a nutshell, the book offers: • A presentation of the Government Offices • A presentation of the Government ministers 2007 • The Government Offices – facts & figures The yearbook will answer some of your questions about the Government Offices. More information is available on the Government website: www.sweden.gov.se. 2007 Omslag hela.indd 1 08-06-02 15.43.32 Facts & Figures Swedish Government Offices Yearbook 2007 Editor: Anna Dahlén, Information Rosenbad Production: Government Offices of Sweden, May 2008 Translation: Ruth Brown, Ministry for Foreign Affairs Illustrations: Susanne Engman, Woo Agency Printed by: Edita Västra Aros, Västerås 2008 ISSN: 1404-479X ISBN: 978-91-38-22983-5 The Swedish Government Offices Yearbook 2007 was produced by the Office for Administrative Affairs. The English edition of the Yearbook 2007 is an abridged version of the Swedish edition. Preface PREFACE THIS YEARBOOK presents facts and figures about the There is also a presentation of the ministers who served organisation, duties and activities of the Government in the Swedish Government in 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • First Defence Meetings (Jan 13, 2004 to Dec
    Source: Wayback Machine Speakers at First Defence meetings (Jan 13, 2004 to Dec. 14, 2009), for www.firstdefence.org Sir Geoffrey E. Pattie, President; while he simultaneously ran SCL Group Limited, Terrington Management Speaker sponsored by First Year Mo_Day Speaker Title Topic_of_Speech Venue Defence (Sir Geoffrey Pattie, Pres.) 2009 Nov 23 Tobias Ellwood MP Author of COIN Ops: Bridging the Post conflict reconstruction; how House of Commons, Committee Gap Between Military and Civilian to win in Afghanistan Room 16 Affairs on the Modern Battlefield 2009 Oct 06 Liam Fox (Dr.) MP, Shadow Secretary of State for Defending Our Interests; Making Manchester Central Room Charter Defence the Case for Defence 2, Conservative Party Fringe Meeting 2009 Jul 14 Douglas Carswell MP, Shadow Secretary of State for The Next Strategic Defence House of Commons, Committee Defence Review: Options for Change, or Room 17 Options for Cuts? 2009 May 12 Geoffrey van Orden MBE, MEP, Conservative Compting Needs, National, NATO House of Commons, Committee Spokesman on Defence and and European: Resolving the Room 6 Security in the European competition for defence resources Parliament, Vice Chairman, Foreign Affairs Committee 2009 Jan 20 Chris Donnelly CMG, TD, Senior Fellow The Forecasing Future Conflict: From House of Commons, Committee Defence Academy of the UK, the Cold War to Hot Peace Room 5 Director of the Institute for Statecraft and Governance 2008 Sep 30 Liam Fox (Dr.) MP, Shadow Secretary of State for Resurgent Threats: Terror, Russia Hall 5 Birmingham International
    [Show full text]
  • Insular Autonomy: a Framework for Conflict Settlement? a Comparative Study of Corsica and the Åland Islands
    INSULAR AUTONOMY: A FRAMEWORK FOR CONFLICT SETTLEMENT? A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CORSICA AND THE ÅLAND ISLANDS Farimah DAFTARY ECMI Working Paper # 9 October 2000 EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MINORITY ISSUES (ECMI) Schiffbruecke 12 (Kompagnietor Building) D-24939 Flensburg . Germany % +49-(0)461-14 14 9-0 fax +49-(0)461-14 14 9-19 e-mail: [email protected] internet: http://www.ecmi.de ECMI Working Paper # 9 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Director: Marc Weller Issue Editors: Farimah Daftary and William McKinney © European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) 2000. ISSN 1435-9812 i The European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) is a non-partisan institution founded in 1996 by the Governments of the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, and the German State of Schleswig-Holstein. ECMI was established in Flensburg, at the heart of the Danish-German border region, in order to draw from the encouraging example of peaceful coexistence between minorities and majorities achieved here. ECMI’s aim is to promote interdisciplinary research on issues related to minorities and majorities in a European perspective and to contribute to the improvement of inter-ethnic relations in those parts of Western and Eastern Europe where ethno- political tension and conflict prevail. ECMI Working Papers are written either by the staff of ECMI or by outside authors commissioned by the Centre. As ECMI does not propagate opinions of its own, the views expressed in any of its publications are the sole responsibility of the author concerned. ECMI Working Paper # 9 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) © ECMI 2000 CONTENTS I.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal Officiel Du Lundi 20 Octobre 1980
    * Année 1980-1981 . — N° 42 A. N. (O.) Lundi 20 Octobre 1980 * JOURNAL OFFICIEL IDE LA RÉPUBLIQUE FRANÇAISE DÉBATS PARLEMENTAIRES ASSEMBLÉE NATIONALE CONSTITUTION DU 4 OCTOBRE 1958 6' Législature QUESTIONS ECRITES REMISES A LA PRESIDENCE DE L'ASSEMBLEE NATIONALE ET REPONSES DES MINISTRES 3. Questions écrites pour lesquelles les ministres demandent un SOMMAIRE délai supplémentaire pour rassembler les éléments de leur réponse (p. 4475). 4 . Liste de rappel des questions écrites auxquelles il n 'a pas été 1. Questions écrites (p . 4365). répondu dans les délais réglementaires (p . 475). 2. Réponses des ministres aux questions écrites (p . 4412). Premier ministre (p . 4412). 5. Rectificatifs (p. 4476). Agriculture (p . 4412). Anciens combattants (p . 44181. Budget (p. 44191. Culture et communication (p . 4426). QUESTIONS ECRITES Economie (p . 4426). Education (p . 4428). Environnement et cadre de vie (p. 44341. Transports routiers (politique des transports routiers). Famille et condition féminine (p . 4436). Fonction publique (p . 4437). 36588. — 20 octobre 1980 . — M . Pierre-Bernard Cousté expose à M . le ministre des transports que la profession de transporteur rou- . 4439). Industrie (p tier semble menacée du lait d ' un certain nombre de décisions gou- Industries agricoles et alimentaires (p. 4446). vernementales, qui mettent cette branche d 'activité en difficulté. Intérieur (p . 4446(. Il lui demande, en conséquence, s ' il envisage d 'assouplir l 'usage Jeunesse, sports et loisirs (p . 4452). strict du contrdlographe en laissant aux conducteurs la possibilité de programmer les heures de conduite ; s ' il ne craint pas que les Justice (p . 4452). transports à longue distance, en particulier alimentaires, soient lour- Postes et télécommunications et télédiffusion (p, 4455).
    [Show full text]
  • Assemblée Nationale Sommaire
    A la découverte de l’Assemblée nationale Sommaire Petite histoire d’une loi (*) ................................... p. 1 à lexique parlementaire ............................................. p. 10 à ASSEMBLÉE NATIONALE Secrétariat général de l’Assemblée et de la Présidence Service de la communication et de l’information multimédia www.assemblee-nationale.fr Novembre 2017 ^ Dessins : Grégoire Berquin Meme^ si elle a été proposée par une classe participant au Parlement des enfants en 1999, la loi dont il est question dans cette bande dessinée n’existe pas. Cette histoire est une fiction. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Groupe politique Ordre du Jour lexique Un groupe rassemble des députés C’est le programme des travaux de qui ont des affinités politiques. l’Assemblée en séance publique. parlementaire Les groupes correspondent, Il est établi chaque semaine par en général, aux partis politiques. la Conférence des Présidents, composée des vice-présidents de Guignols l’Assemblée, des présidents de Tribunes situées au-dessus des deux commission et de groupe et d’un Amendement Commission portes d’entrée de la salle des représentant du Gouvernement. Proposition de modification d’un Elle est composée de députés séances. Elle est présidée par le Président projet ou d’une proposition de loi représentant tous les groupes Journal officiel de l’Assemblée. Deux semaines de soumise au vote des parlementaires. politiques. Elle est chargée d’étudier séance sur quatre sont réservées en L’amendement supprime ou modifie et, éventuellement, de modifier les Le Journal Officiel de la République priorité aux textes présentés par le un article du projet ou de la projets et propositions de loi avant française publie toutes les décisions de Gouvernement.
    [Show full text]
  • How Do Parliaments of France, Italy and Spain Fight Information Asymmetries?
    Parliamentary accountability in Europe: How do parliaments of France, Italy and Spain fight information asymmetries? By Manuel Sánchez de Dios Universidad Complutense de Madrid- Spain [email protected] Paper prepared for the workshop: “Comparing legislatures worldwide: roles, functions and performance in old and new democracies”. DIrectors: Dr. Natalia Ajenjo (U. of Burgos, Spain) and . Mariana Llanos (GIGA Institute, Germany). ECPR Joint Sessions, Rennes (France), 11-16 April, 2008 Abstract: In this paper one considers the variety of forms of parliamentary accountably in South Europe, the functions they can perform and the relevance they have from the viewpoint of the agency theory. In the paper there is also an evaluation of the cases studied. We conclude that there is not a distinctive model of parliamentary accountability in Southern Europe though the three parliaments are “proactive” in checking the executive and Spain and Italy have sound similarities. Plenary debates and policy evaluation are the most relevant activities in France while in Italy there is a big variety of procedures with different functions and high level of activity in committee. In Spain parliamentary accountability have a multifunctional character too and it is very precise and specialized. 1 A) INTRODUCTION The aim of this paper is to estimate the importance of the executive responsibility before the parliament in South European countries. At the same time it evaluates the quality of democracy since parliamentary accountability is one indicator of it. In a democracy parliaments have to ensure that the executive is kept under scrutiny and prevented from abusing its powers. In this paper one only pays attention to ex post accountability or “police patrol oversight” in terms of McCubbins and Schwartz (1984).
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliamentary Engagement in Recovery and Resilience Plan
    Tithe an Oireachtais An Oifig Buiséid Pharlaiminteach Houses of the Oireachtas Parliamentary Budget Office European parliamentary engagement in ParliamentaryRecovery Budget Officeand Resilience Plans Quar Key Messages y The Recovery and Resilience Facility is a significant financial resource available to European States, including Ireland. To ensure transparency and value for money, parliaments in EU Member states are monitoring and scrutinising Recovery and Resilience Plans (RRPs). y This note presents survey information on the experiences of parliaments in the EU on the scrutiny of the RRPs. The note is based on data from a ECPRD1 survey of European Union countries’ parliaments’ involvement and role in the formulation of RRPs and a ECPRD seminar, with case studies on parliamentary engagement from Spain, France and Italy. y The ECPRD survey highlights active engagement of Government with Parliament in some countries and very limited engagement in other countries, as was the case for Ireland. Only 7 out of 24 countries answered no to all four questions on the scrutiny of the RRPs. This includes Ireland. y While there was a public consultation on Ireland’s Recovery and Resilience Plan, as of mid- May 2021, the Government has not submitted a draft or completed Recovery and Resilience Plan to the Houses of the Oireachtas. There has been no substantive engagement with the Oireachtas or Oireachtas Committees on the plan. There has been limited scrutiny by the Oireachtas in the preparation of the Recovery and Resilience Plan. Introductiony To maximise value for money and oversight, there could be value in establishing The Medium-Terma framework Expenditure for best Framework practice, iswhich a set of could administratve enhance procedures parliamentary employed engagementfor the managementfor EU ofprogrammes Voted Current Expendituresuch as the over RRP.
    [Show full text]
  • Defence and Security After Brexit Understanding the Possible Implications of the UK’S Decision to Leave the EU Compendium Report
    Defence and security after Brexit Understanding the possible implications of the UK’s decision to leave the EU Compendium report James Black, Alex Hall, Kate Cox, Marta Kepe, Erik Silfversten For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1786 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif., and Cambridge, UK © Copyright 2017 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: HMS Vanguard (MoD/Crown copyright 2014); Royal Air Force Eurofighter Typhoon FGR4, A Chinook Helicopter of 18 Squadron, HMS Defender (MoD/Crown copyright 2016); Cyber Security at MoD (Crown copyright); Brexit (donfiore/fotolia); Heavily armed Police in London (davidf/iStock) RAND Europe is a not-for-profit organisation whose mission is to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org www.rand.org/randeurope Defence and security after Brexit Preface This RAND study examines the potential defence and security implications of the United Kingdom’s (UK) decision to leave the European Union (‘Brexit’).
    [Show full text]
  • Download Thepdf
    Volume 59, Issue 5 Page 1395 Stanford Law Review KEEPING CONTROL OF TERRORISTS WITHOUT LOSING CONTROL OF CONSTITUTIONALISM Clive Walker © 2007 by the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, from the Stanford Law Review at 59 STAN. L. REV. 1395 (2007). For information visit http://lawreview.stanford.edu. KEEPING CONTROL OF TERRORISTS WITHOUT LOSING CONTROL OF CONSTITUTIONALISM Clive Walker* INTRODUCTION: THE DYNAMICS OF COUNTER-TERRORISM POLICIES AND LAWS................................................................................................ 1395 I. CONTROL ORDERS ..................................................................................... 1403 A. Background to the Enactment of Control Orders............................... 1403 B. The Replacement System..................................................................... 1408 1. Control orders—outline................................................................ 1408 2. Control orders—contents and issuance........................................ 1411 3. Non-derogating control orders..................................................... 1416 4. Derogating control orders............................................................ 1424 5. Criminal prosecution.................................................................... 1429 6. Ancillary issues............................................................................. 1433 7. Review by Parliament and the Executive...................................... 1443 C. Judicial Review..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Government Factsheet Spain
    Digital Public Administration factsheet 2020 Spain ISA2 Digital Public Administration Factsheets - Spain Table of Contents 1 Country Profile ............................................................................................. 3 2 Digital Government Highlights ....................................................................... 8 3 Digital Government Political Communications .................................................11 4 Digital Government Legislation .....................................................................17 5 Digital Government Governance....................................................................23 6 Digital Government Infrastructure .................................................................34 7 Digital Government Services for Citizens and Businesses ................................44 2 Digital Public Administration Factsheets - Spain Country 1 Profile 3 Digital Public Administration Factsheets - Spain 1 Country Profile 1.1 Basic data Population: 46 937 060 (2019) GDP at market prices: 1 245 331 million EUR (2019) GDP per inhabitant in PPS (Purchasing Power Standard EU 27=100): 91 (2019) GDP growth rate: 2.0% (2019) Inflation rate: 0.8% (2019) Unemployment rate: 14.1% (2019) General government gross debt (Percentage of GDP): 95.5 (2019) General government deficit/surplus (Percentage of GDP): -2.8 (2019) Area: 505990 km2 Capital city: Madrid Official EU language: Spanish Currency: Euro Source: Eurostat (last update: 26 June 2020) 4 Digital Public Administration Factsheets - Spain 1.2 Digital
    [Show full text]