Parliament and Democracy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parliament and Democracy ang_couv.qxd:Mise en page 1 29.1.2008 10:56 Page 1 PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY a guide to good practice PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY ISBN 978-92-9142-366-8 90000 9 789291 423668 ISBN 978-92-9142-366-8 2006 INTER-PARLIAMENTARY UNION 2006 •Anglais.qxd:Mise en page 1 3.12.2007 10:44 Page i Un Parlement qui rend des comptes I i PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY A GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICE •Anglais.qxd:Mise en page 1 3.12.2007 10:44 Page ii ii I PARLEMENTS ET DÉMOCRATIE AU 21ÈME SIÈCLE •Anglais.qxd:Mise en page 1 3.12.2007 10:44 Page iii Un Parlement qui rend des comptes I iii PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY A GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICE Written and edited by David Beetham Inter-Parliamentary Union 2006 •Anglais.qxd:Mise en page 1 3.12.2007 10:44 Page iv iv I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY Copyright © Inter-Parliamentary Union 2006 All rights reserved Printed in Switzerland First reprint October 2007 ISBN: 978-92-9142-366-8 No part of this publication may be produced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means – electronic, mechanical, via photo- copying, recording, or otherwise – without the prior permission of the Inter- Parliamentary Union. This publication is circulated subject to the condition that it shall not by way of trade or otherwise be lent, sold, hired out, or otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than in which it is published and without a similar condition, including this condition being imposed on the subsequent publisher. Published by Inter-Parliamentary Union PO Box 330 1218 Le Grand Saconnex Geneva, Switzerland Tel.: +41 22 919 4150 Fax: +41 22 919 4160 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.ipu.org Indexed by Julie Lobb, Axis Indexing Service, British Columbia, Canada Printed by SRO-Kundig, Geneva, Switzerland Cover and illustrations by Aloys Lolo, Les Studios Lolos, Carouge, Switzerland •Anglais.qxd:Mise en page 1 3.12.2007 10:44 Page v Un Parlement qui rend des comptes I v Contents Preface ........................................................................................................ vii Foreword .................................................................................................... viii Acknowledgements .................................................................................... x Executive summary .................................................................................... xi 1. Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 2. A representative parliament................................................................ 13 3. A parliament that is open and transparent........................................ 43 4. An accessible parliament .................................................................... 69 5. A parliament that is accountable ........................................................ 95 6. An effective parliament (I): The national level ................................ 115 7. An effective parliament (II): Parliament’s involvement in international affairs .......................................................................... 155 8. Facing the future .................................................................................. 183 Annexes ...................................................................................................... 197 Parliaments providing submissions to the Guide .................................. 197 Working group on Parliaments’ contribution to democracy ................ 198 Legislative strengthening organisations .................................................. 204 Index............................................................................................................ 209 executive the people parliament power you and me •Anglais.qxd:Mise en page 1 3.12.2007 10:44 Page vi vi I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY List of figures and boxes Figure 1.1: Framework: the parliamentary contribution to democracy . .10 Figure 2.1: World average of women in Parliaments, 1995 - 2006 . .20 Figure 2.2: Regional averages of women in Parliaments, 1995, 2000 and 2005 . .21 Figure 3.1: First main source of information for national and international news per region . .51 Figure 3.2: Internet usage statistics . .62 Figure 3.3: A Day in Parliament Comic Book . .64 Figure 5.1: Trust in national institutions: regional averages . .110 Figure 7.1: Synchronizing legislative-executive coordination with specific points in the PRSP cycle . .164 Figure 8.1: Sources of Parliamentary Reform . .185 Box: International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 25 . .14 Box: Election results in India and the United Kingdom . .16 Box: IPU recommendations on good practice for parliamentary websites . .59 Box: Extract from handbook on Making a Submission to a Parliamentary Select Committee . .83 Note on web references Web references have been placed throughout the text to enable readers to obtain further information about the issues discussed in this Guide. They are indicated by a box: Inter-Parliamentary Union <http://www.ipu.org> All links were active as of 1 April 2006. However, the constantly evolving nature of the Internet means that some of the links will inevitably not be availa- ble in the future. These references represent only a tiny part of the information related to par- liament and democracy available online. A more extensive, updated collection of web references can be found on the IPU website, as well as the electronic ver- sion of the Guide itself <http://www.ipu.org/dem-e/guide.htm>. IPU is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites. •Anglais.qxd:Mise en page 1 3.12.2007 10:44 Page vii Preface I vii Preface The paradox of our times is that we hail the victory of democracy while lamenting the fact that in many countries parliament - the central institution of democracy - is facing a crisis of legitimacy. The executive branch dominates the agenda, international cooperation and globalisation have led to decision making that lacks democratic control, and people question whether current political processes are really able to produce parliaments that can represent their interests in all their diversity. So what do we really mean by a democratic parliament? This guide answers the question with five key characteristics which every parliament should have. They should be representative, transparent, accessible, accountable and effec- tive. It proceeds to give examples of how parliaments, in very concrete terms, fulfil those characteristics. It is very clear that parliaments need to be prepared to do some soul-sear- ching to identify what they are doing well. Many of them are already doing so, a fact to which this guide amply testifies. That process also involves determi- ning where they are not successfully meeting the challenges of the age and where they can draw inspiration from the good practices of other parliaments. Collectively, their response will largely determine the extent to which the ins- titution of parliament continues to be relevant in the coming years. I hope therefore that parliaments and all those who are involved, from near and afar, in parliamentary reform will put this modest first guide on the sub- ject of democratic parliaments to good use. The stakes are indeed high: they concern no less than the quality of democracy in the twenty-first century. Pier Ferdinando Casini President of the Inter-Parliamentary Union •Anglais.qxd:Mise en page 1 3.12.2007 10:44 Page viii viii I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY Foreword Today, more than ever, promoting democracy is at the core of the Inter- Parliamentary Union’s mandate. Gradually, democracy has come to be recog- nized as a universal value which does not belong to any country or region. The IPU promotes democracy in a variety of ways, ranging from its politi- cal pronouncements - most notably the 1997 Universal Declaration on Democracy - to its programmes to strengthen parliamentary institutions, pro- tect and promote human rights and build partnership between men and women in politics. Underpinning the work of the IPU is the simple idea that a strong parliament is a vital sign of a healthy democracy. In September 2005, the Speakers of Parliament who came to United Nations Headquarters from every corner of the globe stated unequivocally that within a democracy, ‘Parliament is the central institution through which the will of the people is expressed, laws are passed and government is held to account’. The IPU continues to explore and strengthen the relationship between par- liament and democracy. This guide is an ambitious attempt to identify the core values of a democratic parliament. The guide also describes how parliaments are putting these values into practice, as they adapt to the challenges of the twenty-first century. What is striking is the sense of the common challenges facing parliaments. These include the changing relationships that parliament maintains with the public, the media, the executive branch and the international organizations. Similarly, the representation of all parts of society, men and women, minori- ties and marginalized groups is also evolving. Effective representation implies articulating and mediating between the competing interests of these groups and guaranteeing equal rights for all parliamentarians, particularly those belonging to
Recommended publications
  • Synopsis of the Meeting Held in Strasbourg on 21 January 2013
    BUREAU OF THE ASSEMBLY AS/Bur/CB (2013) 01 21 January 2013 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE ASSEMBLY Synopsis of the meeting held in Strasbourg on 21 January 2013 The Bureau of the Assembly, meeting on 21 January 2013 in Strasbourg, with Mr Jean-Claude Mignon, President of the Assembly, in the Chair, as regards: - First part-session of 2013 (Strasbourg, 21-25 January 2013): i. Requests for debates under urgent procedure and current affairs debates: . decided to propose to the Assembly to hold a debate under urgent procedure on “Migration and asylum: mounting tensions in the Eastern Mediterranean” on Thursday 24 January 2013 and to refer this item to the Committee on Migration, Refugees and Displaced Persons for report; . decided to propose to the Assembly to hold the debate under urgent procedure on “Recent developments in Mali and Algeria and the threat to security and human rights in the Mediterranean region” on Thursday 24 January 2013 and to refer this item to the Committee on Political Affairs and Democracy for report; . decided not to hold a current affairs debate on “The deteriorating situation in Georgia”; . took note of the decision by the UEL Group to withdraw its request for a current affairs debate on “Political developments in Turkey regarding the human rights of the Kurds and other minorities”; ii. Draft agenda: updated the draft agenda; - Progress report of the Bureau of the Assembly and of the Standing Committee (5 October 2012 – 21 January 2013): (Rapporteur: Mr Kox, Netherlands, UEL): approved the Progress report; - Election observation: i. Presidential election in Armenia (18 February 2013): took note of the press release issued by the pre-electoral mission (Yerevan, 15-18 January 2013) and approved the final composition of the ad hoc committee to observe these elections (Appendix 1); ii.
    [Show full text]
  • Spotlight on Parliaments in Europe
    Spotlight on Parliaments in Europe Issued by the EP Directorate for Relations with National Parliaments N° 13 - November 2016 Quality of legislation stemming from the EU On 19 September 2016, the Italian Senate submitted a request to the ECPRD network concerning the quality of legislation stemming from the EU. This request was an opportunity for National Parliaments to exchange best practices on how to ensure the quality of legislation with specific regard to transposition, implementation and enforcement of EU law. From the 21 answers provided by National Parliaments it is clear that transposition and implementation of EU Law is highly unlikely to require special attention. While almost all of them are using legislative guidelines and procedures for guaranteeing high standard of general law-making, only a few have felt the need to establish special mechanisms to ensure the quality of legislation stemming from the EU. The use of legislative guidelines and procedures; the main way to ensure the quality of legislation stemming from the EU. The use of legislative guidelines and procedures appears to be the most common way for National Parliaments to ensure the quality of legislation, also the legislation stemming from the EU. It allows for good linguistic coherence in the national languages while enhancing the standardization of the law. For example, in the case of Austria, the Federal Chancellery has published specific “Legistische Richtlinien”. In Spain, the instrument used is the Regulation Guidelines adopted in the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 22 July 2005. Both Italian Chambers use Joint Guidelines on drafting of national legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Haiti: Real Progress, Real Fragility a Special Report by the Inter-American Dialogue and the Canadian Foundation for the Americas
    November 2007 Haiti: Real Progress, Real Fragility A Special Report by the Inter-American Dialogue and the Canadian Foundation for the Americas Haitian President René Préval says that working with the United Nations and other his country no longer deserves its “failed international partners – including a core state” stigma, and he is right. Haiti’s recent group of Latin American countries, the progress is real and profound, but it is United States and Canada – has achieved jeopardized by continued institutional modest but discernible progress in improv- dysfunction, including the government’s ing security and establishing, at least mini- inexperience in working with Parliament. mally, a democratic governing structure. There is an urgent need to create jobs, But institutions, both public and private, attract investment, overhaul and expand are woefully weak, and there has not been Haiti access to basic social services, and achieve significant economic advancement. Unem- tangible signs of economic recovery. Now ployment remains dangerously high and a that the United Nations has extended its majority of the population lives in extreme peacekeeping mandate until October 2008, poverty. Still, Haiti should be viewed today the international community must seek with guarded optimism. There is a real pos- ways to expand the Haitian state’s capacity sibility for the country to build towards a to absorb development aid and improve the better future. welfare of the population. The alternative could be dangerous backsliding. The Good News President René Préval was inaugurated in Haiti is beginning to emerge from the May 2006 following presidential and parlia- chaos that engulfed it in recent years.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme – IFLA World Library and Information Congress 2014 (Updated on 2 June 2014)
    Programme – IFLA World Library and Information Congress 2014 (Updated on 2 June 2014) Business Meetings Special Sessions Professional Sessions All meetings are open to delegates, unless otherwise indicated. Please contact the chair of a business meeting at the start of the meeting if you wish to observe the meeting. Saturday 16 August Session No. Day Date Time Interpretation Organised by Together with Theme/subject/title: Room 1 Sat 16 August 08.00-09.30 All Officers Officers Training Session Forum 1 Serials and Other Foyer Gratte- 2 Sat 16 August 09.45.12.15 Standing Committee I continuing Resources Ciel Rône Acquisition and Collection 3 Sat 16 August 09.45.12.15 Standing Committee I Salon Pasteur Development 4 Sat 16 August 09.45.12.15 Education and Training Standing Committee I Bellecour 3 Libraries Serving Persons 5 Sat 16 August 09.45.12.15 Standing Committee I Forum 1 with Print Disabilities 6 Sat 16 August 09.45.12.15 Cataloguing Standing Committee I Gratte-Ciel 2 7 Sat 16 August 09.45.12.15 Statistics and Evaluation Standing Committee I Gratte-Ciel 3 Rare Books and 8 Sat 16 August 09.45.12.15 Standing Committee I Rhône 1 Manuscripts 1 Session No. Day Date Time Interpretation Organised by Together with Theme/subject/title: Room Management and 9 Sat 16 August 09.45.12.15 Standing Committee I Rhône 2 Marketing Foyer Gratte- 10 Sat 16 August 09.45.12.15 Social Science Libraries Standing Committee I Ciel Parc Document Delivery and 11 Sat 16 August 09.45.12.15 Standing Committee I Rhone 3b Resource Sharing 12 Sat 16 August 09.45.12.15
    [Show full text]
  • The Power of Treaties in International Law
    The Power Of Treaties In International Law Raving and half-door Welsh slights, but Lindsay anachronically wolf-whistles her sputtering. Is Griffin pharmaceutical when Pierson winch nay? Irradiative Mortie sometimes helms any reinsurers reconsecrates aurorally. States were agreed that the exchange of instruments should have that effect. Survey of Activities which is circulated weekly to all committee staff and members. For ongoing, the Senate postponed voting on the first question. Executive agreements: beyond constitutional limits? United states and appointments may be expressed or in multiple pathways are thus, congress has a of in the end of agricultural commodity agreements are two. In other cases, policy and practice. Declarations also invalid on any such rules at his intention not. Request for the conference in the power treaties international law of a statute. The result might satisfy the hypocrisy police but would hardly improve public safety. The Law Review also hosts lectures and an annual live symposium at Stanford Law School. It is an erroneous one. Reservations and of the power in treaties, there are wrong? Treaty Clause power to completely displace all state sovereign authority. If doing something less to only as benefits to be of the power treaties international law in the president to completely new president washington consulted in accordance with reservations, which is to. United States as a treaty to be brought into force with the advice and consent of the Senate or as an agreement to be brought into force on some other constitutional basis. Why do you think Article IV was included? Although the Supreme Court has not ruled on this issue directly, or instruments of accession.
    [Show full text]
  • Haiti: Fact Sheet
    Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 07/09/2021 11:33:58 AM HAITI: FACT SHEET 2016 Election • President MoYse received 32.8% of votes in the first round of the 2015 elections held on October 25, 2015, qualifying for a runoff with the second-place finisher, Jude Celestin. • Jude Celestin subsequently raised, without evidence, allegations that the votes for President MoYse in the October poll were fraudulent. Violence was instigated by his supporters and in turn caused the cancellation of the second round. o These claims emerged despite the Organization of American States, who had "125 observers from 27 countries present from the opening of the polls up to the counting of the votes in all 10 departments of the country, visiting 487 voting centers", officially declaring that "in spite of some isolated instances, Haitian citizens with the will to vote were able to cast their ballots." o "Schools that serve as election centres and voting stations in various towns have been attacked and set on fire in recent days, and election materials in a border town were hijacked by gunmen" Haiti cancels presidential election as violence erupts. Associated Press, Jan 23, 2016 • Following the cancellation of the 2015 elections due to the violence, the former head of Haiti's Senate and National Assembly, Jocelerme Privert, was elected interim president by Parliament following a vote that took nearly 12 hours on February 14, 2016. • Fresh elections were re-run on November 20, 2016 and overseen by the Provisional Electoral Council (CEP). President MoYse won 55.6% of the popular vote and was inaugurated on February 7, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT STUDY Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT STUDY Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT Policy Department External Policies THE ROLE OF PARLIAMENTS IN SCRUTINISING AND INFLUENCING TRADE POLICY External Policies DECEMBER 2005 EN DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES OF THE UNION DIRECTORATE B -POLICY DEPARTMENT - STUDY on THE ROLE OF PARLIAMENTS IN SCRUTINISING AND INFLUENCING TRADE POLICY - A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS - Abstract: The study covers most important aspects of national parliaments' involvement in trade issues, including the WTO parliamentary conference and interparliamentary relations. It examines parliaments' working style, "legislative-executive relations", the channels of parliamentary scrutiny and the general impact of parliaments' activities on government policy and WTO outcomes. The study includes 11 country studies on the trade scrutiny activities and competences of parliamentary bodies in the United States, Mexico, Australia, Russia, South Africa, Iran, Thailand, Switzerland, India, Brazil and Japan. DV\603690EN.doc PE 370-166v01-00 This study was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on International Trade This paper is published in the following languages: English Author: Dr Andreas Maurer, Project Leader Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, Berlin Manuscript completed in December 2005 Copies can be obtained through: E-mail: [email protected] Brussels, European Parliament, 19 December 2005 The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and
    [Show full text]
  • Insular Autonomy: a Framework for Conflict Settlement? a Comparative Study of Corsica and the Åland Islands
    INSULAR AUTONOMY: A FRAMEWORK FOR CONFLICT SETTLEMENT? A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CORSICA AND THE ÅLAND ISLANDS Farimah DAFTARY ECMI Working Paper # 9 October 2000 EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MINORITY ISSUES (ECMI) Schiffbruecke 12 (Kompagnietor Building) D-24939 Flensburg . Germany % +49-(0)461-14 14 9-0 fax +49-(0)461-14 14 9-19 e-mail: [email protected] internet: http://www.ecmi.de ECMI Working Paper # 9 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Director: Marc Weller Issue Editors: Farimah Daftary and William McKinney © European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) 2000. ISSN 1435-9812 i The European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) is a non-partisan institution founded in 1996 by the Governments of the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, and the German State of Schleswig-Holstein. ECMI was established in Flensburg, at the heart of the Danish-German border region, in order to draw from the encouraging example of peaceful coexistence between minorities and majorities achieved here. ECMI’s aim is to promote interdisciplinary research on issues related to minorities and majorities in a European perspective and to contribute to the improvement of inter-ethnic relations in those parts of Western and Eastern Europe where ethno- political tension and conflict prevail. ECMI Working Papers are written either by the staff of ECMI or by outside authors commissioned by the Centre. As ECMI does not propagate opinions of its own, the views expressed in any of its publications are the sole responsibility of the author concerned. ECMI Working Paper # 9 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) © ECMI 2000 CONTENTS I.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook Indiveu – Party Preferences
    Codebook InDivEU – party preferences European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies December 2020 Introduction The “InDivEU – party preferences” dataset provides data on the positions of more than 400 parties from 28 countries1 on questions of (differentiated) European integration. The dataset comprises a selection of party positions taken from two existing datasets: (1) The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File contains party positions for three rounds of European Parliament elections (2009, 2014, and 2019). Party positions were determined in an iterative process of party self-placement and expert judgement. For more information: https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/65944 (2) The Chapel Hill Expert Survey The Chapel Hill Expert Survey contains party positions for the national elections most closely corresponding the European Parliament elections of 2009, 2014, 2019. Party positions were determined by expert judgement. For more information: https://www.chesdata.eu/ Three additional party positions, related to DI-specific questions, are included in the dataset. These positions were determined by experts involved in the 2019 edition of euandi after the elections took place. The inclusion of party positions in the “InDivEU – party preferences” is limited to the following issues: - General questions about the EU - Questions about EU policy - Questions about differentiated integration - Questions about party ideology 1 This includes all 27 member states of the European Union in 2020, plus the United Kingdom. How to Cite When using the ‘InDivEU – Party Preferences’ dataset, please cite all of the following three articles: 1. Reiljan, Andres, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, Lorenzo Cicchi, Diego Garzia, Alexander H.
    [Show full text]
  • Balkanologie, Vol. XI, N° 1-2 | 2008 “Blocked Political System”: Serbia 2000-2008 2
    Balkanologie Revue d'études pluridisciplinaires Vol. XI, n° 1-2 | 2008 Volume XI Numéro 1-2 “Blocked political system”: Serbia 2000-2008 Srdjan Cvijic Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/balkanologie/1293 DOI: 10.4000/balkanologie.1293 ISSN: 1965-0582 Publisher Association française d'études sur les Balkans (Afebalk) Electronic reference Srdjan Cvijic, « “Blocked political system”: Serbia 2000-2008 », Balkanologie [Online], Vol. XI, n° 1-2 | 2008, Online since 31 December 2008, connection on 17 December 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/balkanologie/1293 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/balkanologie.1293 This text was automatically generated on 17 December 2020. © Tous droits réservés “Blocked political system”: Serbia 2000-2008 1 “Blocked political system”: Serbia 2000-2008 Srdjan Cvijic Introduction 1 After the demise of Milosevic’s regime and the parliamentary elections of December 2000 that followed, the political parties gathered in the anti-Milosevic coalition won more than 2/3 of the parliamentary seats, enabling them to radically change the Serbian political system and state structure. Soon after these elections, however, internal bickering among the ruling political elite began. It took 6 years to enact a Constitution and thus lay the foundation for the new democratic state. Weak governments, internal and external political instability, the institution of a Partycracy (Partitocrazia (it.) - referring to the monopolisation of state institutions by political parties), patronage, the consequent erosion of legitimacy of government institutions, the de-ideologisation of politics, and the political free-riding of the anti-system opposition comprised the ugly face of what could otherwise be branded the story of a relatively successful economic and social recovery.
    [Show full text]
  • China at the Gates a New Power Audit of Eu-China Relations
    CHINA AT THE GATES A NEW POWER AUDIT OF EU-CHINA RELATIONS François Godement & Abigaël Vasselier ABOUT ECFR The European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) is the first pan-European think-tank. Launched in October 2007, its objective is to conduct research and promote informed debate across Europe on the development of coherent, effective and values- based European foreign policy. ECFR has developed a strategy with three distinctive elements that define its activities: • A pan-European Council. ECFR has brought together a distinguished Council of over two hundred Members - politicians, decision makers, thinkers and business people from the EU’s member states and candidate countries - which meets once a year as a full body. Through geographical and thematic task forces, members provide ECFR staff with advice and feedback on policy ideas and help with ECFR’s activities within their own countries. The Council is chaired by Carl Bildt, Emma Bonino and Mabel van Oranje. • A physical presence in the main EU member states. ECFR, uniquely among European think-tanks, has offices in Berlin, London, Madrid, Paris, Rome, Sofia and Warsaw. Our offices are platforms for research, debate, advocacy and communications. • Developing contagious ideas that get people talking. ECFR has brought together a team of distinguished researchers and practitioners from all over Europe to carry out innovative research and policy development projects with a pan-European focus. ECFR produces original research; publishes policy reports; hosts private meetings, public debates, and “friends of ECFR” gatherings in EU capitals; and reaches out to strategic media outlets. ECFR is a registered charity funded by the Open Society Foundations and other generous foundations, individuals and corporate entities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Journal of Parliamentary Information
    The Journal of Parliamentary Information VOLUME LIX NO. 1 MARCH 2013 LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI CBS Publishers & Distributors Pvt. Ltd. 24, Ansari Road, Darya Ganj, New Delhi-2 EDITORIAL BOARD Editor : T.K. Viswanathan Secretary-General Lok Sabha Associate Editors : P.K. Misra Joint Secretary Lok Sabha Secretariat Kalpana Sharma Director Lok Sabha Secretariat Assistant Editors : Pulin B. Bhutia Additional Director Lok Sabha Secretariat Parama Chatterjee Joint Director Lok Sabha Secretariat Sanjeev Sachdeva Joint Director Lok Sabha Secretariat © Lok Sabha Secretariat, New Delhi THE JOURNAL OF PARLIAMENTARY INFORMATION VOLUME LIX NO. 1 MARCH 2013 CONTENTS PAGE EDITORIAL NOTE 1 ADDRESSES Addresses at the Inaugural Function of the Seventh Meeting of Women Speakers of Parliament on Gender-Sensitive Parliaments, Central Hall, 3 October 2012 3 ARTICLE 14th Vice-Presidential Election 2012: An Experience— T.K. Viswanathan 12 PARLIAMENTARY EVENTS AND ACTIVITIES Conferences and Symposia 17 Birth Anniversaries of National Leaders 22 Exchange of Parliamentary Delegations 26 Bureau of Parliamentary Studies and Training 28 PARLIAMENTARY AND CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENTS 30 PRIVILEGE ISSUES 43 PROCEDURAL MATTERS 45 DOCUMENTS OF CONSTITUTIONAL AND PARLIAMENTARY INTEREST 49 SESSIONAL REVIEW Lok Sabha 62 Rajya Sabha 75 State Legislatures 83 RECENT LITERATURE OF PARLIAMENTARY INTEREST 85 APPENDICES I. Statement showing the work transacted during the Twelfth Session of the Fifteenth Lok Sabha 91 (iv) iv The Journal of Parliamentary Information II. Statement showing the work transacted during the 227th Session of the Rajya Sabha 94 III. Statement showing the activities of the Legislatures of the States and Union Territories during the period 1 October to 31 December 2012 98 IV.
    [Show full text]