ACTA APOSTOLICAE SEDIS COMMENTARIUM OFFICIALE ANNUS XI - VOLUMEN XI R O M a E TYPIS POLYGLOTTIS VATICANIS MCMXIX C L * Afe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ACTA APOSTOLICAE SEDIS COMMENTARIUM OFFICIALE ANNUS XI - VOLUMEN XI R O M a E TYPIS POLYGLOTTIS VATICANIS MCMXIX C L * Afe ACTA APOSTOLICAE SEDIS COMMENTARIUM OFFICIALE ANNUS XI - VOLUMEN XI R O M A E TYPIS POLYGLOTTIS VATICANIS MCMXIX c l * Afe. I; Annus XI - Vol. XI 2 Ianuarii 1919 Num. 1 ACTA APOSTOLICAE SEDIS COMMENTARIUM OFFICIALE ACTA SS. CONGREGATIONUM SUPREMA SACRA CONGREGATIO S. OFFICII DECRETUM Feria IV, die 27 novembris 1918 In generali consessu Supremae huius Sacrae Congregationis Sancti Officii Emi ac Rmi Domini Cardinales in rebus fidei et morum Inquisitores Generales damnarunt ac proscripserunt et in Indicem librorum prohibitorum inserenda esse decreverunt opuscula: 1. ERNESTO BONAIUTI, La genesi della dottrina agostiniana intorno al peccato originale. Roma, Tipografìa del Senato di Giovanni Bardi, 1916. 2. ERNESTO BONAIUTI, Sant'Agostino. A. F. Formiggini, Editore in Roma, 1917. Et insequenti feria V, die 28 eiusdem mensis et anni, Sanctissimus Dominus Noster Benedictus divina Providentia Papa XV, in audientia R. P. D. Assessori Sancti Officii impertita, relatam sibi Emorum Patrum resolutionem approbavit, confirmavit ac publicari iussit. Datum Romae in aedibus Sancti Officii, die 14 decembris 1918. A. Castellano, S. B. et U. I. Notarius. 6 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale SACRA CONGREGATIO CONSISTORIALIS T SERENENSIS COMMUTATIONIS FINIUM Postulante R. P. D. Carolo Silva Cotapos, Episcopo Serenensi, cum favorabili sui Cathedralis Capituli suffragio et consentiente Aloysio Silva Lezaeta, Vicario Apostolico Antofogastensi, ut regio vulgo nuncupata Departemento de Taltal distraheretur a dioecesi Serenensi ac praefato Vicariatui uniretur; SSmus Dominus Noster Benedictus PP. XV preces benigne excipiendas censuit et decrevit. Ideoque, habito Nuntii Apostolici voto, praesenti Sacrae Congregationis Consistorialis Decreto, tota regio de Taltal distrahitur et separatur a dioecesi Serenensi et Vicariatui Antofogastensi adiicitur et unitur, ut spirituali fidelium bono praestantius ac facilius consulatur: simulque respectivi fines Dioeceseos et Vicariatus commutantur. Contrariis quibuscumque minime obstantibus. Datum Romae, ex Aedibus Sacrae Congregationis Consistorialis, die novembris 1918. )$( C. CARD. DE LAI, Ep. Sabinen., Secretarius. L. j·g S. f V. Sardi, Archiep. Caesarien., Adsessor. I l DECLARATIO CIRCA DECRETUM BEDEUNT1BUS Essendo stato sollevato il dubbio, se i chierici reduci dalia milizia con licenza illimitata siano tenuti a presentarsi ai loro Ordinari^ al pari di quelli che avessero ottenuto il congedo assoluto, ed a fare gli esercizi spirituali entro il tempo fissato, sotto le penalità stabilite nel decreto Bedeuntibus, la S. Congregazione ha risposto: Affermativamente. Ed il Santo Padre ha confermato la risoluzione, ordinando che, nel pubblicarla, si aggiungesse: 1) che coloro i quali, dimessi con licenza illimitata, non si fossero presentati, credendo non esservi tenuti, per motivo di questa buona fede non debbono ritenersi caduti nella censura, 2) che in ogni caso gli Ordinari si guardino dal riméttere nell'esercizio della S. Congregatio Consistorialis 7 cura di anime i reduci dalia milizia, prima che i medesimi con il prescritto ritiro non abbiano rinnovatoli loro spirito. Dato dalla Segreteria della S. Congregazione Concistoriale, il 21 dicembre 1918. )$( G. CARD. DB LAI, Vesc. di Sabina, Segretario. L. % S. -}- V. Sardi, Arciv. tit. di Cesarea, Assessore. III PROVISIO ECCLESIARUM S. C. Consistorialis decretis, SSmus D. N. Benedictus XV has, quae sequuntur, ecclesias de proprio pastore providit, scilicet: 8 novembris 1918. Titulari episcopali ecclesiae Valonensi praefecit R. P. D. Iacobum Aloysium Copello, presbyterum dioeceseos Platensis, quem deputavit in Auxiliarem Revmi Episcopi Platensis. 29 novembris. Cathedrali ecclesiae Tarantasiensi R. D. Ludovicum Termier, parochum loci Aix les Bains , in archidioecesi Chamberiensi. Titulari episcopali ecclesiae Anemuriensi Sophronium Hacbang y Gaborni, Calbayoganae dioeceseos presbyterum, quem deputavit in Auxiliarem Revmi Episcopi Calbayogani. 4 decembris. Cathedrali ecclesiae Abulensi R. D. Henricum Pia y Deniel, canonicum Cathedralis ecclesiae Barcinonensis. Cathedrali ecclesiae Oscensi R. P. Zachariam Martínez y Nuñez, Ordinis Eremitarum Sancti Augustini. 5 decembris. Cathedrali ecclesiae Guayanensi R. P. D. Xistum Sosa, hactenus Episcopum titularem Claudiopolitanum et Guayanensis dioeceseos Administratorem Apostolicum. 13 decembris. Titulari episcopali ecclesiae Croiensi R. D. Iosephum Antonium dos Santos, e Congregatione Missionis, quem deputavit in Auxiliarem Rmi Archiepiscopi Adamantini. 14 decembris, Archiep. ecclesiae Camerinensi R. P. D. Hectorem Fronzi, hactenus episc, cathedr. Ecclesiarum Calliensis et Pergulanae. 21 decembris. ~- Cathedrali ecclesiae Bakeriensi R. D. Iosephum Mae Grath, parochum S. Patritii loci Tacoma in dioecesi Seattlensi. Titulari episcopali ecclesiae Gerasensi R. D. Edmundum Heelan, parochum ecclesiae Ss. Cordis loci Ford Dodge dioecesis Siopolitanae, quem deputavit in Auxiliarem Rmi Episcopi Siopolitani. 8 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale SACRA CONGREGATIO DE DISCIPLINA SACRAMENTORUM SS. EUCHARISTIAE Relatum est huic S. Congregationi de disciplina Sacramentorum in nonnullis Dioecesibus quosdam Vicarios Foraneos, aut Decanos, vel Parochos solere singulis duobus vel tribus mensibus hostias comparare easque distribuere in propriis et filialibus Ecclesiis pro Missae sacrificio peragendo ac pro fidelium eucharistica communione. Elapso hoc temporis spatio, nova fit acquisitio et distributio hostiarum, quae pariter duobus vel tribus mensibus sufficiant, ac ita deinceps. Et exquisitum est an probari possit huiusmodi praxis adhibendi, pro SSmo Eucharistiae sacramento, hostias a tribus vel duobus mensibus confectas. Haec S. Congregatio, omnibus mature perpensis, proposito dubio respondit : negative, et servetur praescriptum Ritualis Romani et Codicis Iuris Canonici. Rituale Romanum (tit. IV, cap. I, De Sanctissimo Eucharistiae Sacramento) haec praecipit: Sanctissimae Eucharistiae particulas frequenter renovabit (parochus). Hostiae vero seu particulae consecrandae sint recentes; et ubi eas consecraverit, veteres primo distribuat vel sumat. In Codice Iuris Canonici haec statuuntur: Can. 815: panis (pro Missae sacrificio) debet esse mere triticeus et recenter confectus ita ut nullum sit periculum corruptionis. Vinum debet esse naturale de genimine vitis et non corruptum . Can. 1272: Hostiae consecratae sive propter fidelium communionem, sive propter expositionem San- ctissimi Sacramenti et recentes sint et frequenter renoventur, vete- ribus rite consumptis ita ut nullum sit periculum corruptionis, sedulo servatis instructionibus quas Ordinarius loci hac de. re dederit . Propter maximam autem quae debetur reverentiam erga SS. Eucharistiae Sacramentum mandat haec S. Congregatio ut in cunctis ecclesiasticis Dioecesium ephemeridibus datum responsum edatur, quo facilius omnibus patescat et ab iis, ad quos spectat, fideliter ác religiose servetur. Datum ex aedibus S. Congregationis de disciplina Sacramentorum, die 7 decembris 1918. PH. CARD. GIUSTINÍ, Praefectus. L. % S. f A. Capotosti, Ep. Thermen., Secretarius. S. Congregatio Concilii 9 SACRA CONGREGATIO CONCILII M E D I O L A N E N . PRAECEDENTIAE 20 novembris 1915 - 1 aprilis 1916 - 13 aprilis 1918 SPECIES FACTI. - Ante decreta napoleonica a. 1805 ex praebendis Metropolitani Capituli Mediolanensis, in triplicem consuetum hierarchicum ordinem distinctis, una dumtaxat iuripatronatui subdebatur, videlicet Praepositura, quae quum postrema dignitas esset, nullam circa, praecedentiam ambiguitatem suppeditabat. Depraedatis autem in publicarum rerum eversione, ineunte saec. xix, praebendarum bonis, ex decreto 8 iunii 1805 constituta fuit unica summa in titulis publicis pro universo Capitulo, quae communis massa in singulos Capitulares iuxta quasdam praefixas normas distribuentur. Restitutum tamen hac ratione Capitulum, iterum in distinctos ordines presbyteralem, diaconalem et subdiaconalem coaluisse, vel ex eo patet, quod, quum postea, a. 1 8 06 et 18:26 privati fundatores duos alios canonicatus cum separata praebenda, ipsorum patrònatui obnoxios, instituere vellent, impetrârunt a Capitulo ut novi isti canonici vel a limine in ordinem presbyteralem cooptarentur, idque sancitum voluerunt tabulis fundationis ubi legimus : L'individuo investito del Canonicato di cui si tratta, apparterrà, giusta la mente del fondatore, all'ordine presbiterale . Quin etiam, an. 1 8 3 6 tertius canonicatus iurispatronatus laicalis fundatus est cum explicita conditione, quod de eo investitus ad ordinem diaconalem statim pertineret; qui tamen canonicatus brevi exstinctus fuit. Hisce fundationibus efficiebatur haud semel ut in ordine presbyterali quidam canonici reperirentur, qui tamen Capitulo aliquot post annis ab aliis canonicis adhuc in diaconali ordine constitutis, adscripti essent : quum autem hi postremi ex diaconali ad presbyteralem ordinem legitima optione ascendere vellent, ambiguum erat utri praecedentia deberetur: aliis verbis, utrum norma praecedentiae ab ingressu in Capitulum, an ab ingressu m ordinem esset desumenda. Casus hic contigit an. 1847, 1 8 5 1 , 1 8 5 4 , 1856, 1 8 6 2 : et quamquam Constitutiones Capituli de re si lerent, tamen ex Mediolanensis cleri descriptionibus (quamquam non officialibus, vulgo: Milano Sacra), satis constat, semper in praxi id observatum esse, ut praecedentia in casu daretur ei qui prior in ordine seu in 10 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale gradu presbyterali reperiretur, quamquam is in Capitulo mniorprsie novo presbytero
Recommended publications
  • Acta Apostolicae Sedis Commentarium Officiale
    ACTA APOSTOLICAE SEDIS COMMENTARIUM OFFICIALE ANNUS XI - VOLUMEN XI ROMAE TYPIS POLYGLOTTIS VATICANIS MCMXIX cl* Afe. I; Annus XI - Vol. XI 2 Ianuarii 1919 Num. 1 ACTA APOSTOLICAE SEDIS COMMENTARIUM OFFICIALE ACTA SS. CONGREGATIONUM SUPREMA SACRA CONGREGATIO S. OFFICII DECRETUM Feria IV, die 27 novembris 1918 In generali consessu Supremae huius Sacrae Congregationis Sancti Officii Emi ac Rmi Domini Cardinales in rebus fidei et morum Inqui­ sitores Generales damnarunt ac proscripserunt et in Indicem librorum prohibitorum inserenda esse decreverunt opuscula: 1. ERNESTO BONAIUTI, La genesi della dottrina agostiniana intorno al peccato originale. Roma, Tipografìa del Senato di Giovanni Bardi, 1916. 2. ERNESTO BONAIUTI, Sant'Agostino. A. F. Formiggini, Editore in Roma, 1917. Et insequenti feria V, die 28 eiusdem mensis et anni, Sanctissimus Dominus Noster Benedictus divina Providentia Papa XV, in audientia R. P. D. Assessori Sancti Officii impertita, relatam sibi Emorum Patrum resolutionem approbavit, confirmavit ac publicari iussit. Datum Romae in aedibus Sancti Officii, die 14 decembris 1918. A. Castellano, S. B. et U. I. Notarius. 6 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale SACRA CONGREGATIO CONSISTORIALIS T SERENENSIS COMMUTATIONIS FINIUM Postulante R. P. D. Carolo Silva Cotapos, Episcopo Serenensi, cum favorabili sui Cathedralis Capituli suffragio et consentiente Aloysio Silva Lezaeta, Vicario Apostolico Antofogastensi, ut regio vulgo nuncupata « Departemento de Taltal » distraheretur a dioecesi Serenensi ac prae­ fato Vicariatui uniretur; SSmus Dominus Noster Benedictus PP. XV preces benigne excipiendas censuit et decrevit. Ideoque, habito Nuntii Apostolici voto, praesenti Sacrae Congregationis Consistorialis Decreto, tota regio de Taltal distrahitur et separatur a dioecesi Serenensi et Vica­ riatui Antofogastensi adiicitur et unitur, ut spirituali fidelium bono prae­ stantius ac facilius consulatur: simulque respectivi fines Dioeceseos et Vicariatus commutantur.
    [Show full text]
  • Theodora by Ophelia Stride 9Y
    Theodora (497-548) was a Byzantine empress, wife of the emperor Justinian I and the most powerful woman in Byzantine history. BY OPHELIA STRIDE 9Y OPHELIA BY THEODORA WHO WERE THEY AND WHY WERE THEY FAMOUS AND HER EARLY LIFE? Theodora, (born c. 497 CE—died June 28, 548, Constantinople was the Byzantine impress, wife of the emperor Justinian I (reigned 527–565) and was probably the most powerful woman in Byzantine history. Her intelligence and political presence made her Justinian’s most trusted adviser and enabled her to use the power and influence of her office to promote religious and social policies that favoured her interests. Little is known of Theodora’s early life, but her father, Acacius, was a bear keeper at the Hippodrome (circus) in Constantinople and my sources says that she became an actress and prostitute while still young, therefore leading an unconventional life that included giving birth to at least one child out of wedlock. For a time, she made her living as a wool spinner. When Justinian met her, she had been converted to miaphysitism, a nonorthodox doctrine. Attracted by her beauty and intelligence, he made her his mistress and married her in 525. Her unfortunate background meant that prior to the marriage, special legislation had to be passed legalizing unions between actresses and men of senatorial rank or higher. When Justinian succeeded to the throne in 527, she was proclaimed augusta. her superior intelligence and deft handling of political affairs caused many to think that it was she, rather than Justinian, who ruled Byzantium.
    [Show full text]
  • 25011016 Justinian
    "Our Most Pious Consort Given Us by God": Dissident Reactions to the Partnership of Justinian and Theodora, A.D. 525-548 Author(s): Charles Pazdernik Source: Classical Antiquity, Vol. 13, No. 2 (Oct., 1994), pp. 256-281 Published by: University of California Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25011016 Accessed: 12-01-2017 22:58 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25011016?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms University of California Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Classical Antiquity This content downloaded from 128.228.173.41 on Thu, 12 Jan 2017 22:58:39 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms CHARLES PAZDERNIK "Our Most Pious Consort Given Us by God": Dissident Reactions to the Partnership of Justinian and Theodora, A.D. 525-548 T E VIVIDNESS with which the reign of Justinian I and his empress Theodora holds our imagination emerges no less from the coloring given the period in the writings of contemporary figures than from the events themselves, however momentous they were.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ruin of the Roman Empire
    7888888888889 u o u o u o u THE o u Ruin o u OF THE o u Roman o u o u EMPIRE o u o u o u o u jamesj . o’donnell o u o u o u o u o u o u o hjjjjjjjjjjjk This is Ann’s book contents Preface iv Overture 1 part i s theoderic’s world 1. Rome in 500: Looking Backward 47 2. The World That Might Have Been 107 part ii s justinian’s world 3. Being Justinian 177 4. Opportunities Lost 229 5. Wars Worse Than Civil 247 part iii s gregory’s world 6. Learning to Live Again 303 7. Constantinople Deflated: The Debris of Empire 342 8. The Last Consul 364 Epilogue 385 List of Roman Emperors 395 Notes 397 Further Reading 409 Credits and Permissions 411 Index 413 About the Author Other Books by James J. O’ Donnell Credits Cover Copyright About the Publisher preface An American soldier posted in Anbar province during the twilight war over the remains of Saddam’s Mesopotamian kingdom might have been surprised to learn he was defending the westernmost frontiers of the an- cient Persian empire against raiders, smugglers, and worse coming from the eastern reaches of the ancient Roman empire. This painful recycling of history should make him—and us—want to know what unhealable wound, what recurrent pathology, what cause too deep for journalists and politicians to discern draws men and women to their deaths again and again in such a place. The history of Rome, as has often been true in the past, has much to teach us.
    [Show full text]
  • SOBORNOST St
    SOBORNOST St. Thomas the Apostle Orthodox Church (301) 638-5035 Church 4419 Leonardtown Road Waldorf, MD 20601 Rev. Father Joseph Edgington, Pastor (703) 532-8017 [email protected] www.apostlethomas.org American Carpatho-Russian Orthodox Diocese ECUMENICAL PATRIARCHATE OF CONSTANTINOPLE Wednesday: Moleben to the Theotokos 6:00 AM Friday: Moleben to the Cross 6:00 AM Saturday: Confession 4:30 PM Great Vespers 5:00 PM Sunday: Matins (Orthros) 8:45 AM | Divine Liturgy 10:00 AM July 11, 2021 – 3rd Sunday After Pentecost Great-Martyr Euphemia the All-praised The Miracle of Saint Euphemia the All-Praised: The holy Great Martyr Euphemia (September 16) suffered martyrdom in the city of Chalcedon in the year 304, during the time of the persecution against Christians by the emperor Diocletian (284-305). One and a half centuries later, at a time when the Christian Church had become victorious within the Roman Empire, God deigned that Euphemia the All- Praised should again be a witness and confessor of the purity of the Orthodox teaching. In the year 451 in the city of Chalcedon, in the very church where the glorified relics of the holy Great Martyr Euphemia rested, the sessions of the Fourth Ecumenical Council (July 16) took place. The Council was convened for determining the precise dogmatic formulae of the Orthodox Church concerning the nature of the God-Man Jesus Christ. This was necessary because of the widespread heresy of the Monophysites [“mono-physis” meaning “one nature”], who opposed the Orthodox teaching of the two natures in Jesus Christ, the Divine and the Human natures (in one Divine Person).
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Coins Elementary Manual
    ^1 If5*« ^IP _\i * K -- ' t| Wk '^ ^. 1 Digitized by Google Digitized by Google Digitized by Google Digitized by Google Digitized by Google Digitized by Google PROTAT BROTHERS, PRINTBRS, MACON (PRANCi) Digitized by Google ROMAN COINS ELEMENTARY MANUAL COMPILED BY CAV. FRANCESCO gNECCHI VICE-PRBSIDENT OF THE ITALIAN NUMISMATIC SOaETT, HONORARY MEMBER OF THE LONDON, BELGIAN AND SWISS NUMISMATIC SOCIBTIES. 2"^ EDITION RKVISRD, CORRECTED AND AMPLIFIED Translated by the Rev<> Alfred Watson HANDS MEMBF,R OP THE LONDON NUMISMATIC SOCIETT LONDON SPINK & SON 17 & l8 PICCADILLY W. — I & 2 GRACECHURCH ST. B.C. 1903 (ALL RIGHTS RF^ERVED) Digitized by Google Arc //-/7^. K.^ Digitized by Google ROMAN COINS ELEMENTARY MANUAL AUTHOR S PREFACE TO THE ENGLISH EDITION In the month of July 1898 the Rev. A. W. Hands, with whom I had become acquainted through our common interests and stud- ieSy wrote to me asking whether it would be agreeable to me and reasonable to translate and publish in English my little manual of the Roman Coinage, and most kindly offering to assist me, if my knowledge of the English language was not sufficient. Feeling honoured by the request, and happy indeed to give any assistance I could in rendering this science popular in other coun- tries as well as my own, I suggested that it would he probably less trouble ii he would undertake the translation himselt; and it was with much pleasure and thankfulness that I found this proposal was accepted. It happened that the first edition of my Manual was then nearly exhausted, and by waiting a short time I should be able to offer to the English reader the translation of the second edition, which was being rapidly prepared with additions and improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • Textual Representation and Visual Display Of
    Female power and its propaganda: textual representation and visual display of imperial women in Late Antiquity and Byzantium (II) 16:00 - 18:30 Friday, 23rd August, 2019 Room 8 Presentation type Workshop 163 The image of empress Lupicina/Euphemia in the patristic sources Margarita Vallejo Girvés University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Spain Abstract Among the important governments of emperors Anastasius and Justinian, and those of their respective wives, that of Justin I has gone unnoticed. Until the study of B. Croke in 2007 the period between 518 and 527 has been treated as a previous step of the mandate of Justinian I, being therefore Justin I a mere puppet in the hands of his nephew. Nonetheless, there is currently a broad debate about the figure of Justin I and his real political activity. On top of this, it should not be surprising that the interest for Euphemia, wife of Justin I, has been practically reduced to a simple opposition to the marriage of Justinian and Theodora. However, the ecclesiastical sources present her with a great capacity to influence her husband in such matters as the end of the Acacian schism, which was the great religious initiative of Justin I´s reign. This is the case of Pope Hormisdas, on behalf of the supporters of the ecclesiastical union between Rome and Constantinople, who requests the intervention of Euphemia to persuade the emperor to restore three Chalcedonian bishops deposed by Anastasius I. This is also the case of John of Ephesus who, as attested in fragments preserved through Pseudo-Dionysius of Tel-Mahre and Michael the Syrian, is presented not only as an active militant of the Chalcedonian, but also as the only member of the court of Justin I whose pressure on John of Constantinople achieved that he accepted, in the end, the union with Rome.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Western Perceptions of Eastern Romans Undergraduate Research
    1 Western Perceptions of Eastern Romans Undergraduate Research Thesis Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with honors research distinction in Classics in the undergraduate colleges of The Ohio State University By Kaelyn McAdams The Ohio State University April 2017 Project Advisor: Professor Anthony Kaldellis, Department of Classics Chapters Introduction 2 Issues of Roman Identity: Western Perceptions of Eastern Romans 2 Claudian: In Eutropium 3 Context 3 In Eutropium 4 Conclusion 10 Sidonius Apollinaris: Panegyric on Anthemius 11 Context 11 The Panegyric for Anthemius 13 Conclusion 18 Cassiodorus: The Variae 20 Context 20 Cassiodorus and the Variae 21 The Variae: Looking Deeper 22 Conclusion 31 Procopius: On the Outside Looking In 34 Context 34 Procopius’ Wars of Justinian 35 Conclusion 44 Wrapping Up 46 Conclusion 46 Bibliography 49 2 Introduction Issues of Roman Identity: Western Perceptions of Eastern Romans This thesis seeks to explore and interpret perceptions of eastern Romans from Latin political rhetoric produced by western authors. The study begins in 395 CE after the death of Theodosius, and continues through the reign of Justinian. The two sections provided below confront perceptions of eastern Romans through the authors Claudian and Sidonius. Although Claudian and Sidonius are writing at different time periods, they are both writing at a time when the Roman emperors are puppets for semi-barbaric leaders. Roman authors propagate to their audience that Roman culture continues to dominate, and particularly that western Romans are superior to even the eastern Romans. Claudian proclaims western dominance by asserted that the east is made effeminate by Eutropius, and therefore the eastern Romans defaulted to being subordinate to masculine westerners due to gender stereotypes.
    [Show full text]
  • Justinian: Lieutenant of Christ, Legislator for Christendom
    JUSTINIAN: LIEUTENANT OF CHRIST, LEGISLATOR FOR CHRISTENDOM CraigA Stern* Born a peasant of the Balkans and elevated to the highest station on earth, the Roman Emperor Justinian produced perhaps the second most important writing in the history of the world. His faithfulness to God in the work God had put before him produced fruit that nourishes man and glorifies God to this day, one and one half millennia later. Jus- tinian's greatest work, second in influence only to the word of God, is the Corpus Juris Civilis, the definitive compilation of Roman law. The year 483 saw the birth of Petrus Sabbatius in the town of Tauresium, in what is now Yugoslavia. There he likely would have stayed had not his uncle Justin risen through the ranks to become chief of the imperial palace guard in Constantinople, New Rome, capital of the Roman Empire. The childless Justin had drawn his nephew to the capi- tal, where the illiterate soldier hoped Petrus would acquire the command experience his uncle possessed and the learning his uncle lacked. These attainments, and political connections, would make the youth a suitable heir., Petrus Sabbatius, taking the added surname Justinianus in honor of his avuncular patron, apparently took well to his military duties, to his studies-especially in theology and law-and to Theodora, a lowborn actress of loose morals and engaging personality. The death of the em- peror in 518 led to the elevation of Justin himself to the Purple. By then, the 36-year-old Justinian had become well prepared to guide his uncle, if not in fact to reign through him.2 (Actually, it seems Justinian was of- fered the throne himself before Justin, but declined in favor of the old soldier.
    [Show full text]
  • Anicia Juliana: the Rightful Ruler and Her Controversial Construction Louisa Raitt University of Puget Sound
    University of Puget Sound Sound Ideas Writing Excellence Award Winners Student Research and Creative Works 11-10-2011 Anicia Juliana: The Rightful Ruler And Her Controversial Construction Louisa Raitt University of Puget Sound Follow this and additional works at: http://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/writing_awards Recommended Citation Raitt, Louisa, "Anicia Juliana: The Rightful Ruler And Her Controversial Construction" (2011). Writing Excellence Award Winners. Paper 20. http://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/writing_awards/20 This First Year Seminar is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research and Creative Works at Sound Ideas. It has been accepted for inclusion in Writing Excellence Award Winners by an authorized administrator of Sound Ideas. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Louisa Raitt November 10, 2011 Hagia Sophia ART120 Kriszta Kotsis Anicia Juliana: The Rightful Ruler And Her Controversial Construction In 527 AD, an esteemed member of elite Byzantine society, Anicia Juliana, dedicated her private church of St. Polyeuktos in the city of Constantinople.1 As the largest and most magnificent structure in Constantinople, St. Polyeuktos stood on the Mese, the leading thoroughfare in the ancient capital, near the church of Holy Apostles.2 In 532AD, Emperor Justinian commissioned the reconstruction of Constantinople’s Church of Hagia Sophia, which would become arguably one of the world’s greatest and most impressive architectural structures.3 However, one cannot ignore the resemblance between these two structures. Upon viewing the Hagia Sophia, still in existence today, one can see the clear ties to the ancient church honoring the martyred St. Polyeuktos. Through studying the two churches, however, it is made evident that these two structures were not commissioned for solely religious purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Materials for the Study of Late Antique and Medieval Greek and Latin Inscriptions in Istanbul
    MATERIALS FOR THE STUDY OF LATE ANTIQUE AND MEDIEVAL GREEK AND LATIN INSCRIPTIONS IN ISTANBUL A REVISED AND EXPANDED BOOKLET THE SUMMER PROGRAMME IN BYZANTINE EPIGRAPHY THE KOÇ UNIVERSITY'S RESEARCH CENTER FOR ANATOLIAN CIVILIZATIONS ISTANBUL, 3-9 SEPTEMBER 2018 PREPARED BY IDA TOTH AND ANDREAS RHOBY OXFORD and VIENNA 2020 THE SUMMER PROGRAMME IN BYZANTINE EPIGRAPHY WAS FUNDED BY KOÇ UNIVERSITY’S STAVROS NIARCHOS FOUNDATION CENTER FOR LATE ANTIQUE AND BYZANTINE STUDIES (GABAM). IT WAS HOSTED BY KOÇ UNIVERSITY'S RESEARCH CENTER FOR ANATOLIAN CIVILIZATIONS (ANAMED) ORGANISED IN PARTNERSHIP WITH: THE INTER-FACULTY OF LATE ANTIQUE AND BYZANTINE STUDIES THE OXFORD CENTRE FOR BYZANTINE RESEARCH (OXFORD UNIVERSITY) THE INSTITUTE FOR MEDIEVAL RESEARCH, THE DIVISION OF BYZANTINE RESEARCH (THE AUSTRIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES) FOR THE FULL SCHEDULE OF THE PROGRAMME, CLICK ON Byzantine Epigraphy Programme With our special thanks to Engin Akyürek and Chris Roosevelt for their encouragement and generous support; Mustafa Sayar and Ivana Jevtić, our fellow-concepteurs, for their judicious guidance and good humour; Buket Coşkuner and her team at ANAMED, for providing a welcoming home to us all during our stay in Istanbul; David Hendrix, Ingela Nilsson, Meriç Öztürk, Brigitte Pitarakis, Alessandra Ricci, and Roman Shliakhtin, for their insights, hospitality, and, when necessary, presbeia, which secured access to some rare and unpublished inscriptional material; all our participants – our colleagues and friends – for the memorable week of inspiring seminar presentations, lively discussions, and vigorous walking-and-talking site visits. We look forward to our next epigraphic venture! ISBN 978-3-200-06987-9 How to cite: N.N.
    [Show full text]
  • The Miracle of the Great Martyr St. Euphemia the All-Praised (July
    Scripture Readings The Miracle of the Great Martyr St. Euphemia the All-Praised (July 11) EPISTLE 2nd Letter to the Corinthians 6:1-10 Brethren, working together with him, we entreat you not to accept According to tradition, the holy Great Martyr Euphemia was the daughter of a Roman the grace of God in vain. For he says, "At the acceptable time I have listened to you, and helped you on the day of salva- senator and grew up in Chalcedon, near Istanbul in modern Turkey, and from her youth tion." Behold, now is the acceptable time; behold, now is the day of salvation. We put no obstacle in any one's way, so she was consecrated to virginity. At that time, during the persecution against Christians that no fault may be found with our ministry, but as servants of God we commend ourselves in every way: through great by the emperor Diocletian, the provincial governor decreed that all of the inhabitants of endurance, in afflictions, hardships, calamities, beatings, imprisonments, tumults, labors, watching, hunger; by purity, Chalcedon participate in sacrifices to Ares. Euphemia was discovered with forty-nine knowledge, forbearance, kindness, the Holy Spirit, genuine love, truthful speech, and the power of God; with the weap- other Christians hiding in a house and worshipping God, in defiance of the gover- ons of righteousness for the right hand and for the left; in honor and dishonor, in ill repute and good repute. We are nor&#39;s orders. Because of their refusal to sacrifice, they were tortured for days and treated as impostors, and yet are true; as unknown, and yet well known; as dying, and behold we live; as punished, and sent to the emperor for trial, except Euphemia.
    [Show full text]