Section 98, the Communist Party of Canada, and the Battle for Legality in the Interwar Period

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Section 98, the Communist Party of Canada, and the Battle for Legality in the Interwar Period Capitalism on Trial: Section 98, the Communist Party of Canada, and the Battle for Legality in the Interwar Period by C. Scott Eaton B.A. (Hons.), Memorial University of Newfoundland, 2012 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences C. Scott Eaton, 2015 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Summer 2015 Approval Name: C. Scott Eaton Degree: Master of Arts (History) Title: Capitalism on Trial: Section 98, the Communist Party of Canada and the Battle for Legality in the Interwar Period Examining Committee: Chair: Roxanne Panchasi Associate Professor Mark Leier Senior Supervisor Professor Allen Seager Supervisor Associate Professor Tina Loo External Examiner Professor Department of History University of British Columbia Date Defended/Approved: 28 August, 2015 ii Abstract In 1919, the Canadian state enacted a law that criminalized the advocacy of radical politics. Section 98, as it became, was broad in its terminology, and carried a maximum punishment of twenty years imprisonment. In 1931, the state utilized the law against eight leaders of the Communist Party of Canada in an attempt to declare the organization to be illegal in Canada. The party, however, did not crumble under pressure. At trial, the accused were able to use the courtroom as a forum to protest the legality of the law; after the leaders were convicted, the party campaigned tirelessly for the release of their comrades, and for the repeal of Section 98. The party was successfully able to use its repression to forward its political agenda. This thesis explores how the party navigated Canada’s legal system in order to realize its political goals. Keywords: Section 98; Communist Party of Canada; radicalism; free speech; legal history; political trials iii Acknowledgements In its maturation, this project has received support in a variety of ways. It is my intention to acknowledge and thank those who have provided such assistance. Foremost, I am indebted to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council for their most generous financial support, without which, this project could not have come to fruition. I would like to thank my supervisory committee. My senior supervisor, Dr. Mark Leier, has guided me with wisdom, humour, and patience. He has also lent me numerous books, which I promise that I will one day return. Dr. Allen Seager has similarly offered me his wisdom, posing me with puzzling, and fascinating philosophical questions. I am grateful to have worked with you both. Many people within SFU’s Department of History deserve mention. Ruth Anderson helped me get into the MA Program, and she has helped me with its “ins and the outs” throughout my time here. For that, I thank you. Dr. Aaron Windel, Dr. Willeen Keough, Dr. Andrea Geiger, and Dr. Roxanne Panchasi, Dr. Evdoxios Doxiados, and John-Henry Harter are but a few of the professors who have encouraged me, and remained somewhat conscious while I described my project. Many thanks to all of you. I thank my friends and classmates – Kathryn Hearn, Simone Hanebaum, Sarah Inglis, Liam O’Flaherty, Maddie Knickerbocker, Neal Adolph, and Andrea Samoil – for providing moral, and often times liquid support when I needed it the most. I must further thank Kathryn for her help in the editing process; your knowledge of grammar and syntax have helped my thesis in no small capacity. Lastly, I must thank my family. First, I thank my Mother for her continued love and encouragement. I similarly thank my sisters, Alison and Erin, for their love and support; you are all great inspirations in my life. Finally, I thank my Father. He is the model of a genuine, passionate, hard-worker, and he has been at the other end countless conversations that have shaped my project, my understanding of the law, and my life more generally. iv Table of Contents Approval .............................................................................................................................ii Abstract ............................................................................................................................. iii Acknowledgements ...........................................................................................................iv Table of Contents .............................................................................................................. v List of Acronyms ................................................................................................................vi Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1. “That is irrelevant and does not hinge on the evidence filed:” Politics and the Law in the Trial of the Communist Leaders .............. 15 Pre-Trial Tactics .............................................................................................................. 20 Trial Strategies ................................................................................................................ 36 Election of Jury and the Crown’s Opening Address ............................................... 38 The Crown’s Case .................................................................................................. 44 The Defence ........................................................................................................... 53 Closing Arguments, Charge to the Jury, and Sentencing ...................................... 63 Chapter 2. “The verdict of guilty was to be expected in the courts of capitalism:” The CLDL & the Repeal of Section 98 ............................. 75 Capitalist Courts on Trial ................................................................................................. 77 Protests ........................................................................................................................... 88 The Irrational State .......................................................................................................... 94 The End of Bennett and Section 98 .............................................................................. 110 Conclusion ................................................................................................................ 120 References ................................................................................................................ 124 Unpublished Primary Sources ....................................................................................... 124 Public Archives of Ontario .................................................................................... 124 University of British Columbia – Rare Books and Special Collections ................. 124 University of Toronto – Thomas Fisher Rare Books Library ................................ 124 Simon Fraser University – Special Collections and Rare Books .......................... 124 Newspapers ......................................................................................................... 125 Published Primary Sources ........................................................................................... 125 Secondary Sources ....................................................................................................... 126 Appendix A. Criminal Code of Canada – Section 98 (1919-36) ............................ 132 Appendix B. CLDL Form Letter – “Resolution RE: Section 98 of the Criminal Code of Canada.” ................................................................................................. 135 v List of Acronyms CLDL Canadian Labor Defense League CPC Communist Party of Canada CPSU Communist Party of the Soviet Union FOC Finnish Organization of Canada ILD International Labour Defence MWUC Mine Workers’ Union of Canada UFLTA Ukrainian Farmer Labour Temple Association of Canada UMWA United Mine Workers of America WET Workers’ Experimental Theatre WUL Workers’ Unity League vi Introduction At dusk on 20 October 1932, General Secretary of the Communist Party of Canada (CPC), Timothy Buck, sat alone in his cell at Kingston Penitentiary. Pandemonium, however, soon erupted. Troops, hired by the warden to break a prisoners’ demonstration, had surrounded the prison, and began firing shots into a number of the cells. Buck recalled seeing these troops approach his cell: I saw a detail of guards crossing the lawn with rifles at the slope, and a keeper in charge of them. They marched right up to the front of Cell Number Sixteen – that was mine – and there they left-wheeled, and stood facing me. From the slope, they cocked their rifles at the aim. I didn’t think at all. But there had been shooting, and I didn’t know what was happening, so I dropped to the floor. They fired, and the bullets entered my cell. One of the bullets hit one of the bars of my cell gate with a bang that seemed to shake the entire cell block.1 The troops fired both rifles and shotguns at Buck, but had narrowly missed with each shot. The Canadian state had attempted to murder the leader of the CPC. Notably, Buck was in Kingston Penitentiary, not for his actions, but for his political beliefs. This requires some explanation. On 22 May 1919, the House of Commons received a report from a committee considering the potential revision of Canada’s sedition laws. In the words of Judy Fudge and Eric Tucker, “the recommendations were truly draconian.” In bill form, the report’s recommendations were passed in the House of Commons on 27 June 1919. This officially brought
Recommended publications
  • John Manley VERBATIM Memo to Martin — Engage Canada-US Relations As One of PM’S “Overriding Responsibilities”
    John Manley VERBATIM Memo to Martin — engage Canada-US relations as one of PM’s “overriding responsibilities” In a major address to the Canadian Institute of International Affairs in Calgary on March 23, former deputy prime minister and finance minister John Manley had some forthright advice for Paul Martin on re-engaging Canada-US relations at the highest level and as a top priority. “I know that George W. Bush is not an easy sell in Canada — it doesn’t matter,” Manley said. “He is the elected leader of our neighbour, the country that is our biggest customer by far, and millions of Canadian jobs are affected by his decisions.” Other advice to Martin: join with the US in continental missile defence, since they will build it whether Canada joins or not, and name an ambassador to the US who has the ear and the confidence of the prime minister, and who sits at the table of the new Canada-US cabinet committee. Ironically, Manley declined Martin’s offer to name him ambassador to Washington, and is not running in this election. À l’occasion d’un important discours prononcé à l’Institut canadien des affaires internationales, le 23 mars dernier à Calgary, l’ancien vice-premier ministre et ministre des Finances John Manley a vivement conseillé à Paul Martin de rétablir en priorité les relations canado-américaines au plus haut niveau. « Peu importe que George W. Bush soit impopulaire au Canada. Il est le chef élu de notre voisin du Sud, un pays qui est de loin notre principal client et dont les décisions influent sur des millions d’emplois canadiens.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithuanian Jews and the Holocaust
    Ezra’s Archives | 77 Strategies of Survival: Lithuanian Jews and the Holocaust Taly Matiteyahu On the eve of World War II, Lithuanian Jewry numbered approximately 220,000. In June 1941, the war between Germany and the Soviet Union began. Within days, Germany had occupied the entirety of Lithuania. By the end of 1941, only about 43,500 Lithuanian Jews (19.7 percent of the prewar population) remained alive, the majority of whom were kept in four ghettos (Vilnius, Kaunas, Siauliai, Svencionys). Of these 43,500 Jews, approximately 13,000 survived the war. Ultimately, it is estimated that 94 percent of Lithuanian Jewry died during the Holocaust, a percentage higher than in any other occupied Eastern European country.1 Stories of Lithuanian towns and the manner in which Lithuanian Jews responded to the genocide have been overlooked as the perpetrator- focused version of history examines only the consequences of the Holocaust. Through a study utilizing both historical analysis and testimonial information, I seek to reconstruct the histories of Lithuanian Jewish communities of smaller towns to further understand the survival strategies of their inhabitants. I examined a variety of sources, ranging from scholarly studies to government-issued pamphlets, written testimonies and video testimonials. My project centers on a collection of 1 Population estimates for Lithuanian Jews range from 200,000 to 250,000, percentages of those killed during Nazi occupation range from 90 percent to 95 percent, and approximations of the number of survivors range from 8,000 to 20,000. Here I use estimates provided by Dov Levin, a prominent international scholar of Eastern European Jewish history, in the Introduction to Preserving Our Litvak Heritage: A History of 31 Jewish Communities in Lithuania.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 November 1945 439 Copy No Secret Spfctai, Sectton
    1 NOVEMBER 1945 439 COPY NO SECRET SPFCTAI, SECTTON MONTHT.Y Rin.I.RTTN Ottawa, Ontario November 1, 1945. Contents Monthly Comment 1 L.P.P. & Ford Motor Strike. Windsor, Ontario 2 L.P.P. Fear Trades & Labour Congress 10 Convention at Present [^deletion: 2 lines] Labour Progressive Party in B.C. Provincial Election 17 Jewish Section of L.P.P. Holds National Conference 18 [3«deletion: 1 line) Student Labour Club in McGill University 22 Toronto Labour College Prepares for Opening 26 New L.P.P. Student Club Formed at University of Toronto 27 [^deletion: 1 line] Subversive Activity Among B.C. Shipyard Workers 29 [^deletion: 1 line] [unnumbered] MONTHT Y COMMENT This month marks the beginning of a new series of Monthly Bulletins. The format is one lending itself to easy compilation as a ready and comprehensive reference fylc. This first issue is forwarded in an Ac- copress Binder into which each subsequent issue up to and including December 1946, is to be inserted as received. At that time a complete index covering all issues forwarded over that period will be sent out. Commencing in 1947, each January issue will be forwarded in a binder to be used similar to the one forwarded this month and the total issues in any one calendar year will constitute a new volume. Recipients of this "Bulletin" are again cautioned that this material is of a secret nature and intended for the sole use of those to whom it is directed. It must be kept under lock and key at all times when not in use.
    [Show full text]
  • The Communist Party of Great Britain Since 1920 Also by David Renton
    The Communist Party of Great Britain since 1920 Also by David Renton RED SHIRTS AND BLACK: Fascism and Anti-Fascism in Oxford in the ‘Thirties FASCISM: Theory and Practice FASCISM, ANTI-FASCISM AND BRITAIN IN THE 1940s THE TWENTIETH CENTURY: A Century of Wars and Revolutions? (with Keith Flett) SOCIALISM IN LIVERPOOL: Episodes in a History of Working-Class Struggle THIS ROUGH GAME: Fascism and Anti-Fascism in European History MARX ON GLOBALISATION CLASSICAL MARXISM: Socialist Theory and the Second International The Communist Party of Great Britain since 1920 James Eaden and David Renton © James Eaden and David Renton 2002 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2002 978-0-333-94968-9 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4LP. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2002 by PALGRAVE Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N. Y. 10010 Companies and representatives throughout the world PALGRAVE is the new global academic imprint of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative North Americas: What Canada and The
    ALTERNATIVE NORTH AMERICAS What Canada and the United States Can Learn from Each Other David T. Jones ALTERNATIVE NORTH AMERICAS Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, D.C. 20004 Copyright © 2014 by David T. Jones All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, scanned, or distributed in any printed or electronic form without permission. Please do not participate in or encourage piracy of copyrighted materials in violation of author’s rights. Published online. ISBN: 978-1-938027-36-9 DEDICATION Once more for Teresa The be and end of it all A Journey of Ten Thousand Years Begins with a Single Day (Forever Tandem) TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1 Borders—Open Borders and Closing Threats .......................................... 12 Chapter 2 Unsettled Boundaries—That Not Yet Settled Border ................................ 24 Chapter 3 Arctic Sovereignty—Arctic Antics ............................................................. 45 Chapter 4 Immigrants and Refugees .........................................................................54 Chapter 5 Crime and (Lack of) Punishment .............................................................. 78 Chapter 6 Human Rights and Wrongs .................................................................... 102 Chapter 7 Language and Discord ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Liberals: a House Divided Introduction
    The Liberals: A House Divided Introduction “I will fulfill my mandate and focus entirely on governing from now until February Focus 2004. At which time my work will be done and at which time my successor will be In an unprec- chosen. And then, at the age of 70, I will look back with great satisfaction as I take edented move against a sitting my rest with Aline, secure in the knowledge that the future of Canada is unlim- Canadian prime ited.” — Prime Minister Jean Chrétien, August 21, 2002 minister, a signifi- cant number of Struggle for Power media and political organizers, the buzz Liberal Party mem- The summer of 2002 will be remem- about his future grew louder and louder. bers appeared The Martin camp was particularly ready to vote bered for both the hot weather and the against Jean equally hot political battle waged within active in promoting their man for the Chrétien in a the ranks of the Liberal Party of next leadership campaign. They built a planned leadership Canada. Open political warfare raged powerful organization and raised sub- review next year. inside the heart of Canada’s most stantial funds. Incensed by this pressure The split in the to leave, Chrétien and Martin had a Liberal camp was successful political machine. A party highlighted this that traditionally rallied around its falling out, and Martin left cabinet. spring when Paul leader appeared ready to tear itself apart Liberals were increasingly divided Martin, one of the over the question of leadership. and feared an open battle at a planned main contenders to After the Liberal victory of 2000, convention to review Chrétien’s leader- replace the PM, attention was drawn to the question of ship in February 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Eight Men Speak a Reflection
    Alan Filewod Authorship, Left Modernism, and Communist Power in Eight Men Speak A Reflection Theatrical Women and Party Men In Stage Left, her 1981 memoir of the workers’ theatre troupe that she founded in the 1930s, Toby Gordon Ryan provides a circuitous and careful account that avoids, and at times erases, details of the operational relationship of her theatre troupe and the command organs of the underground Communist Party under the leadership of its imprisoned General Secretary, Tim Buck. One of those elisions concerns the play that subsequent commentators have identified as the most significant production of the Workers’ Theatre, Eight Men Speak.1 In one of the more curious episodes in her memoir, Toby Gordon Ryan refers to the play as “a high point” and “a great accomplishment,” but says almost nothing about it (43). Instead she provides an account of the play by her husband, Oscar Ryan, the instigator and one of the authors of the play, and then includes brief remembrances from two of the other authors, Frank Love and Edward Cecil-Smith (43-46). At first glance there is nothing remarkable about this moment of deferral in the logic of the book, because it is a scrapbook of recollections and testimonies in which many people are quoted at length. But in this surrogated account of Eight Men Speak Toby Gordon Ryan replays one of the critical but unnoticed features of the collision of theatrical modernism and the authority of the Communist Party apparatus, in which the voices of radical women were silenced and their artistic work contained by doctrinal and, invariably, masculinist power.
    [Show full text]
  • JOHN A. MACDONALD the Indispensable Politician
    JOHN A. MACDONALD The Indispensable Politician by Alastair C.F. Gillespie With a Foreword by the Hon. Peter MacKay Board of Directors CHAIR Brian Flemming Rob Wildeboer International lawyer, writer, and policy advisor, Halifax Executive Chairman, Martinrea International Inc., Robert Fulford Vaughan Former Editor of Saturday Night magazine, columnist VICE CHAIR with the National Post, Ottawa Jacquelyn Thayer Scott Wayne Gudbranson Past President and Professor, CEO, Branham Group Inc., Ottawa Cape Breton University, Sydney Stanley Hartt MANAGING DIRECTOR Counsel, Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, Toronto Brian Lee Crowley, Ottawa Calvin Helin SECRETARY Aboriginal author and entrepreneur, Vancouver Lincoln Caylor Partner, Bennett Jones LLP, Toronto Peter John Nicholson Inaugural President, Council of Canadian Academies, TREASURER Annapolis Royal Martin MacKinnon CFO, Black Bull Resources Inc., Halifax Hon. Jim Peterson Former federal cabinet minister, Counsel at Fasken DIRECTORS Martineau, Toronto Pierre Casgrain Director and Corporate Secretary of Casgrain Maurice B. Tobin & Company Limited, Montreal The Tobin Foundation, Washington DC Erin Chutter Executive Chair, Global Energy Metals Corporation, Vancouver Research Advisory Board Laura Jones Janet Ajzenstat, Executive Vice-President of the Canadian Federation Professor Emeritus of Politics, McMaster University of Independent Business, Vancouver Brian Ferguson, Vaughn MacLellan Professor, Health Care Economics, University of Guelph DLA Piper (Canada) LLP, Toronto Jack Granatstein, Historian and former head of the Canadian War Museum Advisory Council Patrick James, Dornsife Dean’s Professor, University of Southern John Beck California President and CEO, Aecon Enterprises Inc., Toronto Rainer Knopff, Navjeet (Bob) Dhillon Professor Emeritus of Politics, University of Calgary President and CEO, Mainstreet Equity Corp., Calgary Larry Martin, Jim Dinning Prinicipal, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Women and the Communist Party of Canada, 1932-1941, with Specific Reference to the Activism of Dorothy Livesay and Jim Watts
    Mother Russia and the Socialist Fatherland: Women and the Communist Party of Canada, 1932-1941, with specific reference to the activism of Dorothy Livesay and Jim Watts by Nancy Butler A thesis submitted to the Department of History in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada November 2010 Copyright © Nancy Butler, 2010 ii Abstract This dissertation traces a shift in the Communist Party of Canada, from the 1929 to 1935 period of militant class struggle (generally known as the ‘Third Period’) to the 1935-1939 Popular Front Against Fascism, a period in which Communists argued for unity and cooperation with social democrats. The CPC’s appropriation and redeployment of bourgeois gender norms facilitated this shift by bolstering the CPC’s claims to political authority and legitimacy. ‘Woman’ and the gendered interests associated with women—such as peace and prices—became important in the CPC’s war against capitalism. What women represented symbolically, more than who and what women were themselves, became a key element of CPC politics in the Depression decade. Through a close examination of the cultural work of two prominent middle-class female members, Dorothy Livesay, poet, journalist and sometime organizer, and Eugenia (‘Jean’ or ‘Jim’) Watts, reporter, founder of the Theatre of Action, and patron of the Popular Front magazine New Frontier, this thesis utilizes the insights of queer theory, notably those of Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick and Judith Butler, not only to reconstruct both the background and consequences of the CPC’s construction of ‘woman’ in the 1930s, but also to explore the significance of the CPC’s strategic deployment of heteronormative ideas and ideals for these two prominent members of the Party.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitalism Unchallenged : a Sketch of Canadian Communism, 1939 - 1949
    CAPITALISM UNCHALLENGED : A SKETCH OF CANADIAN COMMUNISM, 1939 - 1949 Donald William Muldoon B.A., Simon Fraser University, 1974 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of History @ DONALD WILLIAM MULDOON 1977 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY February 1977 All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL Name: Donald William Muldoon Degree: Master of Arts Title of Thesis: Capitalism Unchallenged : A Sketch of Canadian Communism, 1939 - 1949. Examining Committee8 ., Chair~ergan: .. * ,,. Mike Fellman I Dr. J. Martin Kitchen senid; Supervisor . - Dr.- --in Fisher - &r. Ivan Avakumovic Professor of History University of British Columbia PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENSE I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis or dissertation (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for mu1 tiple copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Title of Thesi s/Di ssertation : Author : (signature) (name) (date) ABSTRACT The decade following the outbreak of war in September 1939 was a remarkable one for the Communist Party of Canada and its successor the Labor Progressive Party.
    [Show full text]
  • Discussion Following the Remarks of Mr. Nobrega and Mr. Phillips Proceedings of the Canada-United States Law Institute Conference on Multiple Actors in Canada-U.S
    Canada-United States Law Journal Volume 30 Issue Article 22 January 2004 Discussion following the Remarks of Mr. Nobrega and Mr. Phillips Proceedings of the Canada-United States Law Institute Conference on Multiple Actors in Canada-U.S. Relations: Border Infrastructure: Getting to Yes on Bridges, Tunnels, Roads and Rail: Custo Discussion Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/cuslj Recommended Citation Discussion, Discussion following the Remarks of Mr. Nobrega and Mr. Phillips Proceedings of the Canada-United States Law Institute Conference on Multiple Actors in Canada-U.S. Relations: Border Infrastructure: Getting to Yes on Bridges, Tunnels, Roads and Rail: Custo, 30 Can.-U.S. L.J. 109 (2004) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/cuslj/vol30/iss/22 This Speech is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canada-United States Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. DISCUSSION FOLLOWING THE REMARKS OF MR. NOBREGA AND MR. PHILLIPS MR. KING: I have a question. What role can the press play in getting to yes in this set up? In other words, what I wanted to find out is what role could the press play in getting to yes? Have you seen times when the press played an important role in educating the public to the importance to this? MR. PHILLIPS: In my experience, Henry, the press picks it up when there is a fight or argument going on or something explosive so that will sell papers more so than reporting on needs to be.
    [Show full text]
  • What Has He Really Done Wrong?
    The Chrétien legacy Canada was in such a state that it WHAT HAS HE REALLY elected Brian Mulroney. By this stan- dard, William Lyon Mackenzie King DONE WRONG? easily turned out to be our best prime minister. In 1921, he inherited a Desmond Morton deeply divided country, a treasury near ruin because of over-expansion of rail- ways, and an economy gripped by a brutal depression. By 1948, Canada had emerged unscathed, enriched and almost undivided from the war into spent last summer’s dismal August Canadian Pension Commission. In a the durable prosperity that bred our revising a book called A Short few days of nimble invention, Bennett Baby Boom generation. Who cared if I History of Canada and staring rescued veterans’ benefits from 15 King had halitosis and a professorial across Lake Memphrémagog at the years of political logrolling and talent for boring audiences? astonishing architecture of the Abbaye launched a half century of relatively St-Benoît. Brief as it is, the Short History just and generous dealing. Did anyone ll of which is a lengthy prelude to tries to cover the whole 12,000 years of notice? Do similar achievements lie to A passing premature and imperfect Canadian history but, since most buy- the credit of Jean Chrétien or, for that judgement on Jean Chrétien. Using ers prefer their own life’s history to a matter, Brian Mulroney or Pierre Elliott the same criteria that put King first more extensive past, Jean Chrétien’s Trudeau? Dependent on the media, and Trudeau deep in the pack, where last seven years will get about as much the Opposition and government prop- does Chrétien stand? In 1993, most space as the First Nations’ first dozen aganda, what do I know? Do I refuse to Canadians were still caught in the millennia.
    [Show full text]