Intellectual Practices of a Poor People's Movement in Post
Interface: a journal for and about social movements Article Volume 6 (1): 185 – 210 (May 2014) Robertson, Professors of our own poverty Professors of our own poverty: intellectual practices of a poor people’s movement in post-apartheid South Africa Cerianne Robertson Abstract This paper addresses how a poor people’s movement contests dominant portrayals of ‘the poor’ as a violent mass in contemporary South African public discourse. To explore how Abahlali baseMjondolo, a leading poor people’s movement, articulates its own representation of ‘the poor,’ I examine two primary intellectual and pedagogical practices identified by movement members: first, discussion sessions in which members reflect on their experiences of mobilizing as Abahlali, and second, the website through which the movement archives a library of its own homegrown knowledge. I argue that these intellectual practices open new spaces for the poor to represent themselves to movement members and to publics beyond shack settlements. Through these spaces, Abahlali demonstrates and asserts the intelligence which exists in the shack settlements, and demands that its publics rethink dominant portrayals of ‘the poor.’ Keywords: Abahlali baseMjondolo, the poor, movement, intellectual and pedagogical practices, South Africa, post-apartheid Introduction On August 16, 2012, at a Lonmin platinum mine in Marikana, South Africa, 34 miners on strike were shot dead by police. South African and global press quickly dubbed the event, “The Marikana Massacre,” printing headlines such as “Killing Field”, “Mine Slaughter”, and “Bloodbath,” while videos of police shooting miners went viral and photographs showed bodies strewn on the ground (Herzkovitz, 2012). In September, South Africa’s Mail & Guardian reported that more striking miners “threw stones at officers” while “plumes of black smoke poured into the sky from burning tyres which workers used as barricades” ("Marikana," 2012).
[Show full text]