Current and Future Climate of Kiribati

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Current and Future Climate of Kiribati Washington Butaritari North Pacific Ocean Fanning Kiritmati (Christmas Island) Tarawa BAIRIKI Abemama Nonouti Tabiteuea Nikunau Winslow Arorae Gilbert Islands Phoenix Is. Nikumaroro Malden Carondelet Starbuck Line Islands Vostok Caroline South Pacific Ocean Flint Current and future climate of Kiribati > Kiribati Meteorology Service > Australian Bureau of Meteorology > Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Kiribati’s current climate Kiribati has a hot, humid tropical climate, with air temperatures very closely related to the temperature of the oceans surrounding the small islands and Droughts atolls. Across Kiribati the average temperature is relatively constant year round. Droughts can be very severe Changes in the temperature from season to season are no more than about 1°C. in Kiribati, and are usually associated with La Niña The driest and wettest periods in the rainfall are caused by air rising over events. Average annual rainfall year vary from location to location. warm water where winds converge, in Kiribati is approximately At Tarawa, in the west, the driest six- resulting in thunderstorm activity. 2100 mm with just over month period begins in June, with 900 mm received between May Kiribati’s climate varies considerably the lowest mean rainfall in October. and October. From July 1988 to from year to year due to the El Niño- The wet season usually lasts from December 1989 only 205 mm Southern Oscillation. This is a natural around November to April. At Kiritmati, of rain fell, while from August climate pattern that occurs across 2000 km to the east, the wet season 1998 to February 1999 total the tropical Pacific Ocean and affects is from January to June (Figure 1). rainfall was 95 mm. The recent weather around the world. There are two drought from April 2007 to early Rainfall in Kiribati is affected by extreme phases of the El Niño-Southern 2009 severely affected water the movement of the South Pacific Oscillation: El Niño and La Niña. There supplies in the southern Gilbert Convergence Zone and the Intertropical is also a neutral phase. Across Kiribati, Islands and Banaba. During this Convergence Zone. They extend El Niño events tend to bring wetter, period groundwater became across the South Pacific Ocean from warmer conditions than normal. In the brackish and the leaves of the Solomon Islands to east of the wettest years Tarawa has received more most plants turned yellow. Cook Islands, and across the Pacific than 4000 mm, while in the driest years just north of the equator, respectively as little as 150 mm of rain has fallen. (Figure 2). These bands of heavy Maximum temperature Average temperature Minimum temperature Sea surface temperature 35 35 300 Tarawa, Kiribati, 172.92ºE, 1.35ºN 300 Kiritimati, Kiribati, 157.48ºW, 1.98ºN 250 250 30 30 200 200 25 25 150 150 Temperature (ºC) Temperature (ºC) 100 Monthly rainfall (mm) 100 Monthly rainfall (mm) 20 20 0 50 05 15 0 15 Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Figure 1: Seasonal rainfall and temperature at Tarawa and Kiritimati. 2 and H represents typical positions of moving high pressure systems. typicalpositionsofmovinghighpressure and Hrepresents Warm Pool Pacific zones,thedashedovalshowsWest thebandsofrainfallconvergence the blueshadingrepresents 2: Figure Kiribati Meteorology Service. Kiribati Meteorology Climate datamanagementtraining, 110oE The average positions of the major climate features in November to April. The arrows shownearsurfacewinds, inNovembertoApril.Thearrows Theaveragepositionsofthemajorclimatefeatures 120oE M East o Timor 130oE n s Palau o I 140oE o n W Papua Ne n t a e r Fe m r w Guine 150oE derated StatesofMic t p r a o o o p l o 160 E i Solomon Islands c ro Lagoon Beachatlowtide,SouthTarawa. nesia a S Naur l o Va o nuatu u u 170 E Marshall Islands C t h Kiribati o P n Fiji a H v Tu o c 180 valu e i f r i To c g ng Samoa e a C o 170 W Niue n o n H c 0 5001,0001,5002,000 v e e Tr r o 160 W g Z Cook Islands a e de o n c n W e e o inds 150 W Z Kilometre o n e s 140oW 3 30oS 20oS 10oS 0o 10oN 20oN Kiribati’s changing climate Temperatures Annual rainfall Sea level has risen have increased has increased As ocean water warms it expands causing the sea level to rise. The Annual and seasonal maximum and Data since 1951 for Kiritimati show a melting of glaciers and ice sheets minimum temperatures have increased clear incresing trend in annual and wet also contributes to sea-level rise. in Tarawa since 1950 (Figure 3). season rainfall (Figure 4), but no trend in Maximum temperatures have increased the dry season. At Tarawa, rainfall data Instruments mounted on satellites and at a rate of 0.18°C per decade. These show no clear trends. Over this period, tide gauges are used to measure sea temperature increases are consistent there has been substantial variation in level. Satellite data indicate the sea level with the global pattern of warming. rainfall from year to year at both sites. has risen across Kiribati by 1–4 mm per year since 1993, compared to the global average of 2.8–3.6 mm per year. Sea level rise naturally fluctuates from year to 29.5 El Niño La Niña year and decade to decade as a result 29 of phenomena such as the El Niño- Southern Oscillation. This variation in 28.5 sea level can be seen in Figure 6 which includes the tide gauge record since 28 1950 and satellite data since 1993. emperature (ºC) T 27.5 Ocean acidification 27 Average has been increasing 26.5 About one quarter of the carbon dioxide 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 emitted from human activities each year Year is absorbed by the oceans. As the extra Figure 3: Annual average temperature for Tarawa. Light blue bars indicate carbon dioxide reacts with sea water El Niño years, dark blue bars indicate La Niña years and the grey bars it causes the ocean to become slightly indicate neutral years. more acidic. This impacts the growth of corals and organisms that construct their skeletons from carbonate minerals. 4000 El Niño La Niña These species are critical to the balance 3500 of tropical reef ecosystems. Data 3000 show that since the 18th century the level of ocean acidification has been 2500 slowly increasing in Kiribati’s waters. 2000 Rainfall (mm) 1500 1000 500 0 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 Year Figure 4: Annual rainfall for Kiritmati. Light blue bars indicate El Niño years, dark blue bars indicate La Niña years and the grey bars indicate neutral years. Taking temperature observations, Kiribati Meteorology Service. 4 Kiribati’s future climate Climate impacts almost all aspects of life in Kiribati. Understanding the possible future climate of Kiribati is important so people and the government can plan for changes. How do scientists develop climate projections? Global climate models are the best tools Intergovernmental Panel on Climate for understanding future climate change. Change (IPCC) developed a series of Climate models are mathematical plausible scenarios based on a set of representations of the climate system assumptions about future population that require very powerful computers. changes, economic development and They are based on the laws of physics technological advances. For example, 2090 and include information about the the A1B (or medium) emissions scenario 800 atmosphere, ocean, land and ice. envisages global population peaking mid-century and declining thereafter, 2055 700 There are many different global climate 600 very rapid economic growth, and 2030 tion (ppm) models and they all represent the a r rapid introduction of new and more t climate slightly differently. Scientists from 1990 500 n efficient technologies. Greenhouse e the Pacific Climate Change Science 400 c gas and aerosol emissions scenarios on Program (PCCSP) have evaluated 24 C 300 are used in climate modelling to 2 models from around the world and O provide projections that represent found that 18 best represent the climate C a range of possible futures. of the western tropical Pacific region. Figure 5: Carbon dioxide (CO2) These 18 models have been used to The climate projections for Kiribati concentrations (parts per million, ppm) develop climate projections for Kiribati. are based on three IPCC emissions associated with three IPCC emissions scenarios: low (B1), medium (A1B) scenarios: low emissions (B1 – blue), The future climate will be determined and high (A2), for time periods medium emissions (A1B – green) and by a combination of natural and human around 2030, 2055 and 2090 high emissions (A2 – purple). The factors. As we do not know what the (Figure 5). Since individual models PCCSP has analysed climate model future holds, we need to consider a give different results, the projections results for periods centred on 1990, range of possible future conditions, are presented as a range of values. 2030, 2055 and 2090 (shaded). or scenarios, in climate models. The Taking temperature observations, Kiribati Meteorology Service. Aerial view, South Tarawa. 5 Kiribati’s future climate This is a summary of climate projections for Kiribati. For further information refer to Volume 2 of Climate Change in the Pacific: Scientific Assessment and New Research, and the web-based climate projections tool – Pacific Climate Futures (available at www.pacificclimatefutures.net). Temperature will Changing rainfall continue to increase patterns Projections for all emissions scenarios Almost all of the global climate indicate that the annual average models project an increase in air temperature and sea surface average annual and seasonal rainfall temperature will increase in the over the course of the 21st century.
Recommended publications
  • Hard Custom, Hard Dance : Social Organisation, (Un)
    PETRA M. AUTIO HARD CUSTOM, HARD DANCE SOCIAL ORGANISATION, (UN)DIFFERENTIATION AND NOTIONS OF POWER IN A TABITEUEAN COMMUNITY, SOUTHERN KIRIBATI Academic Dissertation to be publicly discussed, by due permission of the Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of Helsinki, in Auditorium XII of the Main Building, April 17th, 2010, at 10 a.m. PETRA M. AUTIO HARD CUSTOM, HARD DANCE SOCIAL ORGANISATION, (UN)DIFFERENTIATION AND NOTIONS OF POWER IN A TABITEUEAN COMMUNITY, SOUTHERN KIRIBATI Research Series in Anthropology University of Helsinki Academic Dissertation Research Series in Anthropology University of Helsinki, Finland Distributed by Helsinki University Press P.O. Box 4 (Vuorikatu 3 A) 00014 University of Helsinki Finland fax +358-9-7010 2374 http://www.yliopistopaino.fi ISSN 1458-3186 ISBN 978-952-10-6150-9 (paperback) ISBN 978-952-10-6151-6 (PDF) Helsinki University Print Helsinki 2010 To my daughter Oili Raakel Maria CONTENTS List of illustrations vii Notes on names, citations and typographical conventions viii Acknowledgements ix 1. INTRODUCTION 1 Social Differentiation, Undifferentiation and Power in Southern Kiribati 3 Kiribati Introduced 11 The Kiribati Custom 15 Tabiteuea and Its Northern District 17 Tabiteuean Custom and Its Hardness 19 Kiribati Studied 21 Fieldwork and Research Questions 27 The Approach and Course of Chapters 29 2. THE ANCESTOR WITHOUT DESCENDANTS: DIFFERENTIATION AND NOTIONS OF POWER IN TABITEUEA 33 Chiefs Are Forbidden? Myth, history, concept 33 Story of the Story 36 The Story of Kourabi (Karakin Kourabi) 42 Lines of power: The Karongoa clan 46 The apical ancestor: Tematawarebwe the first-born 50 Children of many fathers 52 The twofold ancestor: Akau the younger brother 53 Karongoa clan and power 56 Dualities and Transformation of Power 58 Power in the (Un)making 62 Making men, making chiefs 64 Making women 68 Binding but Not Unbinding: Remaining tabu 76 Power in his things 77 Power in the bones 80 Summary: Differentiation and its cut-off point 83 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Synopsis of Oral History Interviews at Rawaki Village And
    Preliminary Synopsis of Oral History Interviews at Rawaki Village and Nikumaroro Village Solomon Islands by The International Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery (TIGHAR) November 26, 2011 Nikumaroro Village Preliminary Synopsis of Oral History Interviews, Solomon Islands 2011 From August 20-30, 2011, John Clauss, Nancy Farrell, Karl Kern, Baoro Laxton Koraua and Gary F. Quigg, of The International Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery (TIGHAR) conducted a research expedition in the Solomon Islands consisting of oral history interviews with former residents of Nikumaroro Island (Kiribati) as well as a thorough examination of relevant archival materials in the Solomon Islands National Archives. This preliminary synopsis provides an initial overview of the research conducted by TIGHAR as a part of further testing the Earhart Project’s Nikumaroro Hypothesis. A more detailed report will follow, when the audio and video recordings have been completely transcribed and analyzed. Procedures Upon arrival in Honiara (Guadalcanal), Clauss, Farrell, Kern and Quigg were met by Koraua at the airport. Mr. Koraua is a resident of Honiara and the son of Paul Laxton. Mr. Laxton, who served as Assistant Lands Commissioner for the Gilbert and Ellice Islands Colony, was the British Colonial Service officer in charge of the settlement on Gardner Island (Nikumaroro Island) for several years following World War II. Born on Nikumaroro Island in 1960, Mr. Koraua was relocated to the Solomon Islands along with the entire population of the Nikumaroro Island colony in 1963. Mr. Koraua was crucial to the success of the expedition, acting as interpreter, logistics coordinator, ambassador and gracious host. Further, Mr. Koraua provided for our transportation between the outer islands of Kohinggo and Vaghena aboard his boat, the M/V Temauri.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Climate Outlook Forum (OCOF) No. 97 TABLE 1
    Pacific Islands - Online Climate Outlook Forum (OCOF) No. 97 Country Name: Kiribati TABLE 1: Monthly Rainfall Station (include data period) September 2015 July August Total 33%tile 67%tile Median Ranking 2015 2015 Rainfall Rainfall Rainfall (mm) Total Total (mm) (mm) Kanton 224 165.8 - 20.1 51.5 40.0 - Kiritimati 417.3 171.7 124.9 4.0 15.4 8.0 81 Tarawa 171.9 233.1 358.5 55.1 142.8 84.3 64 Butaritari 87.8 176.7 178.6 113.3 177.3 136 52 Beru 135.8 - - 28.1 68.0 43.3 - TABLE 2: Three-monthly Rainfall July to September 2015 [Please note that the data used in this verification should be sourced from table 3 of OCOF #93] Station Three-month 33%tile 67%tile Median Ranking Forecast probs.* Verification * Total Rainfall Rainfall Rainfall (include LEPS) (Consistent, (mm) (mm) (mm) Near- consistent Inconsistent? Kanton - 138.2 219.0 170.9 - 17/ 43 /40 (0.7) - Kiritimati 713.9 42.6 101.3 72.1 88/88 26/29/ 45 (-0.1) Consistent Tarawa 763.5 195.8 543.6 335.0 56/66 6/14/ 80 (19.7) Consistent Butaritari 443.1 506.3 743.0 634.0 16/73 5/35/ 60 (13.5) Inconsistent Beru - 130.7 292.5 173.5 - 3/13/ 84 (23.8) - Period:* below normal /normal /above normal Predictors and Period used for July to September 2015 Outlooks (refer to OCOF #93): Nino 3.4 SST Anomalies extended (2mths) * Forecast is consistent when observed and predicted (tercile with the highest probability) categories coincide (are in the same tercile).
    [Show full text]
  • Kiribati Fourth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity
    KIRIBATI FOURTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Aranuka Island (Gilbert Group) Picture by: Raitiata Cati Prepared by: Environment and Conservation Division - MELAD 20 th September 2010 1 Contents Acknowledgement ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Chapter 1: OVERVIEW OF BIODIVERSITY, STATUS, TRENDS AND THREATS .................................................... 8 1.1 Geography and geological setting of Kiribati ......................................................................................... 8 1.2 Climate ................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Status of Biodiversity ........................................................................................................................... 10 1.3.1 Soil ................................................................................................................................................. 12 1.3.2 Water Resources ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Participatory Diagnosis of Coastal Fisheries for North Tarawa And
    Photo credit: Front cover, Aurélie Delisle/ANCORS Aurélie cover, Front credit: Photo Participatory diagnosis of coastal fisheries for North Tarawa and Butaritari island communities in the Republic of Kiribati Participatory diagnosis of coastal fisheries for North Tarawa and Butaritari island communities in the Republic of Kiribati Authors Aurélie Delisle, Ben Namakin, Tarateiti Uriam, Brooke Campbell and Quentin Hanich Citation This publication should be cited as: Delisle A, Namakin B, Uriam T, Campbell B and Hanich Q. 2016. Participatory diagnosis of coastal fisheries for North Tarawa and Butaritari island communities in the Republic of Kiribati. Penang, Malaysia: WorldFish. Program Report: 2016-24. Acknowledgments We would like to thank the financial contribution of the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research through project FIS/2012/074. We would also like to thank the staff from the Secretariat of the Pacific Community and WorldFish for their support. A special thank you goes out to staff of the Kiribati’s Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources Development, Ministry of Internal Affairs, Ministry of Environment, Land and Agricultural Development and to members of the five pilot Community-Based Fisheries Management (CBFM) communities in Kiribati. 2 Contents Executive summary 4 Introduction 5 Methods 9 Diagnosis 12 Summary and entry points for CBFM 36 Notes 38 References 39 Appendices 42 3 Executive summary In support of the Kiribati National Fisheries Policy 2013–2025, the ACIAR project FIS/2012/074 Improving Community-Based
    [Show full text]
  • Kiribati 2005 Census Data And, Where Possible, It Presents Comparisons with the 2000 and Earlier Census Data
    Kiribati 2005 Census Volume 2: Analytical Report January 2007 CONTENTS page Foreword vii Acknowledgement viii Summary of main indicators ix Executive summary xi 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 POPULATION TREND, COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE 2 2.1 Population trend 2 2.2 Population composition 5 2.3 Population structure 6 3 DEMOGRAPHIC COMPONENTS 12 3.1 Fertility 12 3.2 Mortality 19 3.3 Migration 26 3.3.1 Internal migration 26 3.3.2 International migration 30 4 SOCIAL CHARACTERISTICS 33 4.1 Marital status 33 4.2 Religion 36 4.3 Health 37 4.3.1 Smoking tobacco 37 4.3.2 Drinking alcohol 38 4.4 Educational characteristics 40 4.4.1 School enrolment 40 4.4.2 Educational attainment 40 4.4.3 Educational qualification 42 4.5 Labor market activity 43 4.5.1 Introduction 43 4.5.2 Employed - cash workers and village workers 44 4.5.3 Labour force participation rate and Employment-population ratio 4.5.4 Employed cash workers by work status 4.5.5 Employed cash workers by industry group 46 4.5.6 Employed cash workers by occupational group 46 4.5.7 Unemployed 47 4.5.8 Not in the labor force 48 5 HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS 50 5.1 Household size 50 5.2 Household composition 53 5.3 Household amenities and appliances 54 5.3.1 Private households by main source of drinking water, Kiribati, 2005 54 5.3.2 Private households by type of toilet facility used, Kiribati, 2005 54 5.3.3 Private households by source of lighting, Kiribati, 2005 54 5.3.4 Private households and availability of capital goods, Kiribati, 2005 58 i CONTENTS (continue) page 6 POPULATION PROJECTIONS 59 6.1 Projection
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Financial Analysis
    Outer Islands Transport Infrastructure Investment Project (RRP KIR 53043) ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS A. General 1. The proposed project will finance several activities to improve the safety of interisland navigation and provide resilient outer island access infrastructure for four outer islands in Kiribati. The project scope includes a hydrographic survey to establish digital chart coverage of the outer islands to make navigation safer in the country’s waters in accordance with international conventions and small-scale maritime interventions, which are needed to improve the delivery of basic goods and services to the outer islands. The project will finance rehabilitation of causeways in these islands to reduce transport costs within the islands and improve resilience to climate change and disaster risks. 2. The four islands considered for the project investment are Abaiang, Nonouti, Beru, and Tabiteuea South. Kiribati’s 33 islands are scattered over a large area of central and western Pacific Ocean and constrained by geographic isolation, a small population, and high transport and shipping costs. The nation depends on maritime transport to import essential manufactured goods, export agriculture and fishery products, and connect and resupply outer island communities. Only two ports are capable of handling international shipping—one in Betio and the other in Kiritimati and the outer islands, which are served by domestic (interisland) shipping. Safe navigation aids are limited and defined island access infrastructure nonexistent. The proposed project will tackle these constraints and ease safer access to the outer islands. 3. Standard demand analysis to calculate the project benefits is not applicable for some project components. Therefore, cost-effectiveness analysis or cost–benefit analysis was used for individual subprojects, depending on whether the benefits of the subproject were quantifiable or not.1 For example, the installation of aid to navigation (ATON) is essential but does not lead to direct economic benefit or reduced operating costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Kiritimati and Malden, Kiribati, Nuclear Weapons Test Sites
    Kiritimati and Malden, Kiribati, Nuclear weapons test sites A total of 33 nuclear detonations were conducted on two atolls of the Republic of Kiribati by the UK and the U.S. in the 1950s and 1960s. Thousands of islanders and servicemen were subjected to radioactive fallout and now su er from radiation e ects. History The Pacifi c atoll of Kiritimati (formerly the British colo- ny “Christmas Island”), served during WWII as a stop- over for the U.S. Air Force on its way to Japan. After the war, the United Kingdom used the atolls for its fi rst series of fi ssion bomb explosions. Due to agree- ments made with the Australian government, these servicemen and the indigenous population were free explosions could not be conducted at the British nu- to move around the island, consuming local water and clear testing site at Maralinga. On May 15, 1957, the fruits, bathing in contaminated lagoons and breathing fi rst British hydrogen bomb, code-named “Operation in radioactive dust.1 Grapple,” was exploded off the coast of Malden, fol- In 2006, 300 former Christmas Island residents sub- lowed by another a month later, neither of which yield- mitted a petition to the European Parliament, accus- ed the explosive power that was expected. The tests ing the UK of knowingly exposing them to radioactive reached a maximum yield of 720 kilotons, equivalent fallout despite knowing of the dangers. Declassifi ed to more than 50 times the power of the bomb that was government documents from the time warned that ra- dropped on Hiroshima.
    [Show full text]
  • Ciguatera and Other Marine Poisoning in the Gilbert Islands' M
    Ciguatera and Other Marine Poisoning in the Gilbert Islands' M. J. COOPER 2 AMONG THE ANIMALS that live in the sea are was involved little.notice was taken. During and many that may be poisonous to eat; these ani­ after World W ar II attention was drawn to the mals include fish, sharks, crabs, molluscs, and problem, as there.were .many..rnore.people.in the · turtles. Of all marine animals the most impor­ Pacific who were poisoned by supposedly good tant are fish, which are for so many people an food fish, often in-areas where toxic fish had essential source of food. There are a number of been previously unknown. different ways in which teleost fish may be poi­ Although the symptoms of ciguatera poison­ sonous. Some fish are naturally poisonous; puf­ ing, the species of fish likely to-cause it, and fers for instance are always toxic. Some species many of the areas harboring toxic species have of fish can be poisonous at certain seasons; in been recorded, several aspects ''of the .problem Fiji there is a species of sardine which may be still remain to be solved. In spite of recent re­ deadly poisonous in the later months of the search into ciguatera poisoning,an'antidote to year. A third type of poisoning is found where the poison, a field test for distinguishing atoxic some fish are poisonous to eat when they are fish from a nontoxic one, the ,true nature of the caught on certain reefs or parts of a reef, and yet toxin, and the cause of the development of-eigua­ when caught on other parts of the same reef, or tera among fishes have not yet been discovered.
    [Show full text]
  • Earhart's Final Resting Place Believed Found
    Earhart's Final Resting Place Believed Found Legendary aviatrix Amelia Earhart most likely died on an uninhabited tropical island in the southwestern Pacific republic of Kiribati, according to researchers at The International Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery (TIGHAR). Tall, slender, blonde and brave, Earhart disappeared while flying over the Pacific Ocean on July 2, 1937 in a record attempt to fly around the world at the equator. Her final resting place has long been a mystery. For years, Richard Gillespie, TIGHAR's executive director and author of the book "Finding Amelia," and his crew have been searching the Nikumaroro island for evidence of Earhart. A tiny coral atoll, Nikumaroro was some 300 miles southeast of Earhart's target destination, Howland Island. A number of artifacts recovered by TIGHAR would suggest that Earhart and her navigator, Fred Noonan, made a forced landing on the island's smooth, flat coral reef. According to Gillespie, who is set to embark on a new $500,000 Nikumaroro expedition next summer, the two became castaways and eventually died there. "We know that in 1940 British Colonial Service officer Gerald Gallagher recovered a partial skeleton of a castaway on Nikumaroro. Unfortunately, those bones have now been lost," Gillespie said. The archival record by Gallagher suggests that the bones were found in a remote area of the island, in a place that was unlikely to have been seen during an aerial search. A woman's shoe, an empty bottle and a sextant box whose serial numbers are consistent with a type known to have been carried by Noonan were all found near the site where the bones were discovered.
    [Show full text]
  • National Report Submitted in Accordance with Paragraph 5 of the Annex to Human Rights Council Resolution 16/21*
    United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/35/KIR/1 General Assembly Distr.: General 11 November 2019 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Thirty-fifth session 20–31 January 2020 National report submitted in accordance with paragraph 5 of the annex to Human Rights Council resolution 16/21* Kiribati * The present document has been reproduced as received. Its content does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations. GE.19-18002(E) A/HRC/WG.6/35/KIR/1 I. Introduction and background – UPR in Kiribati 1. Kiribati is a strong patriarchal society, and the culture is a great challenge for many human rights conventions especially gender equality. The Kiribati Family Health Association (KFHA) Report 2010 confirms high violence against women with 68% rate which is the highest in the Pacific. There is an apparent big issue of gender inequality due to cultural and social norms inherent in the traditional systems. 2. The Kiribati National Human Rights Taskforce (KNHRT) was established in July 2014 under the Ministry of Women Youth Sports and Social Welfare. In a transit period, it moved to the new Ministry of Justice in 2018. The Human Rights Division (HRD) has been restructured to increase its capacity and has now 5 staff directly supervised by a Director of HRD. 3. The Taskforce is comprised mainly of government officials1. The Taskforce plays the significant roles of coordination, monitoring, evaluation and reporting on various human rights conventions. 4. This UPR report is the third submitted by Kiribati on the implementation of recommendations of the Human Rights Council arising from the second UPR and outstanding previous recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Vanstone Gavin Poritesgradient.Pdf
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY THE EFFECT OF A NUTRIENT GRADIENT ON THE PORITES-LITHOPHAGA SYSTEM IN THE PHOENIX ISLANDS GAVIN VANSTONE SPRING 2017 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in Biology with honors in Biology Reviewed and approved* by the following: Iliana Baums Associate Professor of Biology Thesis Supervisor Benoît Dayrat Associate Professor of Biology Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT Excess nutrients on coral reefs can lead to increased bioerosion by boring animals, such as mollusks and sponges. Bioerosion leads to weaker coral skeletons that are susceptible to fragmentation by both abiotic and biotic factors. The Phoenix Islands are an isolated archipelago found in the central Pacific Ocean in which the northern islands, Kanton and Enderbury, lie in the path of the Equatorial Undercurrent (EUC) creating periods of upwelling around the islands. This creates a nutrient gradient across the northern group and the southern group of islands. Two morphologically similar reef building corals, Porites evermanni and Porites lobata, were differentially susceptible to bioerosion by Lithophaga mussels, which can increase asexual reproduction rates by fragmentation. Nine of the ten islands studied here exhibited mainly sexual reproduction. Our results suggest a different trophic interaction in the Phoenix Islands than seen in the Eastern Tropical Pacific, where fragmentation by triggerfish
    [Show full text]