DOCSLIB.ORG

Economic and Financial Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Outer Islands Transport Infrastructure Investment Project (RRP KIR 53043) ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS A. General 1. The proposed project will finance several activities to improve the safety of interisland navigation and provide resilient outer island access infrastructure for four outer islands in Kiribati. The project scope includes a hydrographic survey to establish digital chart coverage of the outer islands to make navigation safer in the country’s waters in accordance with international conventions and small-scale maritime interventions, which are needed to improve the delivery of basic goods and services to the outer islands. The project will finance rehabilitation of causeways in these islands to reduce transport costs within the islands and improve resilience to climate change and disaster risks. 2. The four islands considered for the project investment are Abaiang, Nonouti, Beru, and Tabiteuea South. Kiribati’s 33 islands are scattered over a large area of central and western Pacific Ocean and constrained by geographic isolation, a small population, and high transport and shipping costs. The nation depends on maritime transport to import essential manufactured goods, export agriculture and fishery products, and connect and resupply outer island communities. Only two ports are capable of handling international shipping—one in Betio and the other in Kiritimati and the outer islands, which are served by domestic (interisland) shipping. Safe navigation aids are limited and defined island access infrastructure nonexistent. The proposed project will tackle these constraints and ease safer access to the outer islands. 3. Standard demand analysis to calculate the project benefits is not applicable for some project components. Therefore, cost-effectiveness analysis or cost–benefit analysis was used for individual subprojects, depending on whether the benefits of the subproject were quantifiable or not.1 For example, the installation of aid to navigation (ATON) is essential but does not lead to direct economic benefit or reduced operating costs. In these cases, the cost-effectiveness analysis defines the needs that must be met by each subproject, develops alternative options that can satisfy these needs, and ensures that the chosen option is the most cost-effective among the mutually exclusive and technically feasible alternative interventions. Where options have different cash flows over time, discounted cash flow techniques were used to compare them on a net present cost (NPC) basis. In some cases, alternatives will have similar NPCs, in which case other, nonquantifiable criteria must be used to make the final selection. In cases where benefits of the subproject are quantifiable, a cost–benefit analysis was used. In the project economic analysis, cost-effectiveness analysis was used for hydrographic surveying, maritime ATONs, and island access infrastructure, and cost–benefit analysis was used for rehabilitation of island-crossing causeways. B. Assumptions and Parameters 4. All costs and benefits were valued in 2019 constant prices, and all analyses used world price numeraire expressed in United States dollars, adjusted in accordance with standard cost– benefit procedures, a review of previous Asian Development Bank (ADB)– and World Bank– funded Kiribati project analyses, and ADB guidelines. Financial prices were converted into economic prices by removing all taxes. The currency is pegged 1:1 to the Australian dollar. There are no taxes on imports and exports so a standard conversion factor of 1.0 was applied. A shadow wage rate factor of 0.6 was applied to the unskilled component of labor-based wage rates. 1 ADB. 2017. Guidelines for the Economic Analysis of Projects. Manila. 2 5. For the cost-effectiveness analysis, the alternatives were compared using NPCs with the ADB-recommended discount rate of 9% in real terms over 20 years of project appraisal. For the cost–benefit analysis, cost and benefit streams in the with- and without-project scenarios were compared and the economic internal rate of return estimated from the net benefit stream over the analysis period, following ADB guidelines. C. Economic Assessment of Project Components 6. Project component 1: Hydrographic surveying. Most of the waters surrounding Kiribati are not surveyed to a standard needed for safe navigation. This represents a significant safety issue and a constraint on development and maintenance of infrastructure in all islands. Hydrographic survey work will entail establishing accurate tidal predications in the outer islands and will be used to design infrastructure and plan and schedule shipping operations. The Kiribati 20-year Vision 2016–2036 prioritizes hydrographic surveys to enable connectivity and accessibility between islands and deliver social and economic benefits.2 7. The United Kingdom Hydrographic Office (UKHO) is the primary charting authority for Kiribati, producing the official navigational charts on behalf of the Government of Kiribati. The UKHO has prepared a scoping study to assess options for conducting the hydrographic survey in the project islands. Three alternative survey methods were considered: (i) vessel-based, (ii) airborne, and (iii) combined (airborne and vessel). The airborne laser bathymetry would provide the highest standard of accuracy. Vessel-based surveys are not useful without airborne surveys and are dangerous. Vessel-based surveys alone have not been considered as an option but only to supplement airborne surveys as needed. Tidal observations and chart compilation are needed. Table 1 shows the one-time cost to establish the charts. The airborne surveys would deliver charts of sufficient quality to enable much improved safety of navigation and are recommended for the project at a cost of about $5 million. Table 1: Summary of Cost-Effectiveness Comparison for Hydrographic Surveying Options Task Airborne Surveys Combined Airborne and Vessel- ($ million) Based Surveys ($ million) Nonouti 0.917 1.334 Beru 0.767 1.354 Abaiang 0.747 1.594 Tabiteuea South 1.364 2.129 Tidal observations 0.196 0.196 Chart compilation 0.248–0.372 0.248–0.372 Project management 0.216–0.552 0.216–0.552 Total 4.455–4.915 7.071–7.621 Source: United Kingdom Hydrographic Office. 8. Project component 2: Resilient outer island access infrastructure. This component will have three subcomponents: (i) maritime ATONs, (ii) island access infrastructure improvement, and (iii) rehabilitation of island-crossing causeways. 9. Project component 2.1: Maritime ATONs. For safe shipping to the outer islands, mariners require visual references or ATONs such as beacons, buoys, and lighthouses. Many ATONs in the outer islands of Kiribati are missing, meaning that dangers are unmarked. The technical needs assessment carried out by the International Association of Lighthouse Authorities in 2016 recommended several ways to improve capacity and identified the greatest needs, which 2 Government of Kiribati. 2016. Kiribati 20-Year Vision, 2016–2036. 3 are in designing a more enduring lagoon ATON structure, resourcing the materials to fabricate them, accessing a reliable workboat for installation and monitoring, and establishing a proper system of ongoing asset management and maintenance. The proposed project will establish 45 ATONs and provide training for design, installation, and maintenance at an estimated cost of $2 million. The ongoing maintenance will be undertaken by the Marine Division of the Ministry of Information, Communication, Transport and Tourism Development (MICTTD). The incremental cost of maintenance is considered negligible with training provided under the project. The ATONs are essential for shipping safety. No technical alternatives can be considered and, therefore, no cost-effectiveness analysis was undertaken. 10. Project component 2.2: Island access infrastructure improvement. No maritime infrastructure for ship-to-shore transfer, such as jetties or ramps, is available in any of the outer islands. The ocean sides of the islands oriented to the east are exposed to large waves coming from the prevailing wind direction, making vessel berthing and navigation unsafe. The lagoon sides of the islands are oriented to the west but have extensive and extremely shallow sandbanks or rock outcrops, making ship access possible only during high tide. In general, the topography and bathymetry of the islands are unfavorable to shipping and present challenges to safe and efficient ship-to-shore transfer. Several options were explored in each island: (i) In Abaiang, two sites were considered: Tabontebike and Taburao. Tabontebike (South West Abaiang) is a favored vehicle reception point as the lagoon does not have to be navigated to access the shore, However, Tabontebike is an hour away from the population center of Taburao and it is unlikely that a purpose-built jetty will be regularly used. Taburao is a population center, to which general goods are regularly delivered and where passengers regularly board and disembark. The jetty and ramp in Tabontebike would be less beneficial because of its long distance from the main population center. The most cost-effective site is Taburao (Table 3). (ii) In Beru, Tebikeriki (north), Taboiaki (south), and Weneete beach (northwest end) sites were studied. Tebikeriki is the primary shipping point on Beru. Tebikeriki is the only location among all project islands where dredging is feasible, considering the significant improvement of current operations. Dredging of Taboiaki channel in Beru could worsen erosion, diminishing
Recommended publications
  • Hard Custom, Hard Dance : Social Organisation, (Un)

    Hard Custom, Hard Dance : Social Organisation, (Un)

    PETRA M. AUTIO HARD CUSTOM, HARD DANCE SOCIAL ORGANISATION, (UN)DIFFERENTIATION AND NOTIONS OF POWER IN A TABITEUEAN COMMUNITY, SOUTHERN KIRIBATI Academic Dissertation to be publicly discussed, by due permission of the Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of Helsinki, in Auditorium XII of the Main Building, April 17th, 2010, at 10 a.m. PETRA M. AUTIO HARD CUSTOM, HARD DANCE SOCIAL ORGANISATION, (UN)DIFFERENTIATION AND NOTIONS OF POWER IN A TABITEUEAN COMMUNITY, SOUTHERN KIRIBATI Research Series in Anthropology University of Helsinki Academic Dissertation Research Series in Anthropology University of Helsinki, Finland Distributed by Helsinki University Press P.O. Box 4 (Vuorikatu 3 A) 00014 University of Helsinki Finland fax +358-9-7010 2374 http://www.yliopistopaino.fi ISSN 1458-3186 ISBN 978-952-10-6150-9 (paperback) ISBN 978-952-10-6151-6 (PDF) Helsinki University Print Helsinki 2010 To my daughter Oili Raakel Maria CONTENTS List of illustrations vii Notes on names, citations and typographical conventions viii Acknowledgements ix 1. INTRODUCTION 1 Social Differentiation, Undifferentiation and Power in Southern Kiribati 3 Kiribati Introduced 11 The Kiribati Custom 15 Tabiteuea and Its Northern District 17 Tabiteuean Custom and Its Hardness 19 Kiribati Studied 21 Fieldwork and Research Questions 27 The Approach and Course of Chapters 29 2. THE ANCESTOR WITHOUT DESCENDANTS: DIFFERENTIATION AND NOTIONS OF POWER IN TABITEUEA 33 Chiefs Are Forbidden? Myth, history, concept 33 Story of the Story 36 The Story of Kourabi (Karakin Kourabi) 42 Lines of power: The Karongoa clan 46 The apical ancestor: Tematawarebwe the first-born 50 Children of many fathers 52 The twofold ancestor: Akau the younger brother 53 Karongoa clan and power 56 Dualities and Transformation of Power 58 Power in the (Un)making 62 Making men, making chiefs 64 Making women 68 Binding but Not Unbinding: Remaining tabu 76 Power in his things 77 Power in the bones 80 Summary: Differentiation and its cut-off point 83 3.
  • Maiana Social and Economic Report 2008

    Maiana Social and Economic Report 2008

    M AIANA ISLAND 2008 SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE PRODUCED BY THE MINISTRY OF INTERNAL AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS, WITH FINANCIAL SUPPORT FROM THE UNITED NATION DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM, AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE SECRETARIAT OF THE PACIFIC COMMUNITY. Strengthening Decentralized Governance in Kiribati Project P.O. Box 75, Bairiki, Tarawa, Republic of Kiribati Telephone (686) 22741 or 22040, Fax: (686) 21133 MAIANA ANTHEM MAIANA I TANGIRIKO MAIANA I LOVE YOU Maiana I tangiriko - 2 - FOREWORD by the Honourable Amberoti Nikora, Minister of Internal and Social Affairs, July, 2007 I am honored to have this opportunity to introduce this revised and updated socio-economic profile for Maiana island. The completion of this profile is the culmination of months of hard-work and collaborative effort of many people, Government agencies and development partners particularly those who have provided direct financial and technical assistance towards this important exercise. The socio-economic profiles contain specific data and information about individual islands that are not only interesting to read, but more importantly, useful for education, planning and decision making. The profile is meant to be used as a reference material for leaders both at the island and national level, to enable them to make informed decisions that are founded on accurate and easily accessible statistics. With our limited natural and financial resources it is very important that our leaders are in a position to make wise decisions regarding the use of these limited resources, so that they are targeted at the most urgent needs and produce maximum impact. In addition, this profile will act as reference material that could be used for educational purposes, at the secondary and tertiary levels.
  • Kiribati Fourth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity

    Kiribati Fourth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity

    KIRIBATI FOURTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Aranuka Island (Gilbert Group) Picture by: Raitiata Cati Prepared by: Environment and Conservation Division - MELAD 20 th September 2010 1 Contents Acknowledgement ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Chapter 1: OVERVIEW OF BIODIVERSITY, STATUS, TRENDS AND THREATS .................................................... 8 1.1 Geography and geological setting of Kiribati ......................................................................................... 8 1.2 Climate ................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Status of Biodiversity ........................................................................................................................... 10 1.3.1 Soil ................................................................................................................................................. 12 1.3.2 Water Resources ..........................................................................................................................
  • Participatory Diagnosis of Coastal Fisheries for North Tarawa And

    Participatory Diagnosis of Coastal Fisheries for North Tarawa And

    Photo credit: Front cover, Aurélie Delisle/ANCORS Aurélie cover, Front credit: Photo Participatory diagnosis of coastal fisheries for North Tarawa and Butaritari island communities in the Republic of Kiribati Participatory diagnosis of coastal fisheries for North Tarawa and Butaritari island communities in the Republic of Kiribati Authors Aurélie Delisle, Ben Namakin, Tarateiti Uriam, Brooke Campbell and Quentin Hanich Citation This publication should be cited as: Delisle A, Namakin B, Uriam T, Campbell B and Hanich Q. 2016. Participatory diagnosis of coastal fisheries for North Tarawa and Butaritari island communities in the Republic of Kiribati. Penang, Malaysia: WorldFish. Program Report: 2016-24. Acknowledgments We would like to thank the financial contribution of the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research through project FIS/2012/074. We would also like to thank the staff from the Secretariat of the Pacific Community and WorldFish for their support. A special thank you goes out to staff of the Kiribati’s Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources Development, Ministry of Internal Affairs, Ministry of Environment, Land and Agricultural Development and to members of the five pilot Community-Based Fisheries Management (CBFM) communities in Kiribati. 2 Contents Executive summary 4 Introduction 5 Methods 9 Diagnosis 12 Summary and entry points for CBFM 36 Notes 38 References 39 Appendices 42 3 Executive summary In support of the Kiribati National Fisheries Policy 2013–2025, the ACIAR project FIS/2012/074 Improving Community-Based
  • Kiribati 2005 Census Data And, Where Possible, It Presents Comparisons with the 2000 and Earlier Census Data

    Kiribati 2005 Census Data And, Where Possible, It Presents Comparisons with the 2000 and Earlier Census Data

    Kiribati 2005 Census Volume 2: Analytical Report January 2007 CONTENTS page Foreword vii Acknowledgement viii Summary of main indicators ix Executive summary xi 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 POPULATION TREND, COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE 2 2.1 Population trend 2 2.2 Population composition 5 2.3 Population structure 6 3 DEMOGRAPHIC COMPONENTS 12 3.1 Fertility 12 3.2 Mortality 19 3.3 Migration 26 3.3.1 Internal migration 26 3.3.2 International migration 30 4 SOCIAL CHARACTERISTICS 33 4.1 Marital status 33 4.2 Religion 36 4.3 Health 37 4.3.1 Smoking tobacco 37 4.3.2 Drinking alcohol 38 4.4 Educational characteristics 40 4.4.1 School enrolment 40 4.4.2 Educational attainment 40 4.4.3 Educational qualification 42 4.5 Labor market activity 43 4.5.1 Introduction 43 4.5.2 Employed - cash workers and village workers 44 4.5.3 Labour force participation rate and Employment-population ratio 4.5.4 Employed cash workers by work status 4.5.5 Employed cash workers by industry group 46 4.5.6 Employed cash workers by occupational group 46 4.5.7 Unemployed 47 4.5.8 Not in the labor force 48 5 HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS 50 5.1 Household size 50 5.2 Household composition 53 5.3 Household amenities and appliances 54 5.3.1 Private households by main source of drinking water, Kiribati, 2005 54 5.3.2 Private households by type of toilet facility used, Kiribati, 2005 54 5.3.3 Private households by source of lighting, Kiribati, 2005 54 5.3.4 Private households and availability of capital goods, Kiribati, 2005 58 i CONTENTS (continue) page 6 POPULATION PROJECTIONS 59 6.1 Projection
  • Climate Change Adaptation Mainstreaming Implementation in Kiribati

    Climate Change Adaptation Mainstreaming Implementation in Kiribati

    Institutions and Values: Climate Change Adaptation Mainstreaming Implementation in Kiribati Felicity Prance August 2016 Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Philosophy Discipline of Anthropology and Development Studies, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences The University of Adelaide 1 Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Thesis declaration .................................................................................................................................. 7 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. 8 List of acronyms ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Chapter One - Introduction ................................................................................................................ 11 The problem...................................................................................................................................... 14 Purpose and case selection............................................................................................................... 15 Methodology ...................................................................................................................................... 17 Analytical framework and argument
  • North Tarawa Social and Economic Report 2008 2 of 2

    North Tarawa Social and Economic Report 2008 2 of 2

    - 41 - 3.5.7. Community involvement to improve standard of education Normally the community does not interfere with the school curriculum, as it is the responsibility of Government to design them to suit the ages being taught to and ensure their effective implementation. However the community, through the school committee, often takes the initiative to address a wide range of other issues, such as children and teachers comfort, security, staffing, sports, and even school infrastructure. In a lot of cases, the teachers have to take the initiative and assign each pupil a specific task to do for a class activity or a school project at which times, the children always seek and are given help and support from families. This kind of help and support from individual families can take the form of money, food or their own involvement such as in the building of a school ‘mwaneaba’ or singing in a school dancing practice and competition etc. Over the past years the community has assisted both the primary and junior secondary schools especially in performing critical maintenance work on classrooms, offices and teacher residences. These buildings are by right the responsibility of Government who, in many cases has been very slow in providing the financial support needed to keep school infrastructure in good shape. North Tarawa is not an exception in these slow provisions of financial support from the Government, Despite this, the community continue to support their school children and their schools by being guardians of the school property as well as in provision of pupil/student’s school needs for school activities or other school requirements as may arise from time to time.
  • ^ Distrust with Which the Inhabitants of the Other Islands 7"* Viewed Him

    ^ Distrust with Which the Inhabitants of the Other Islands 7"* Viewed Him

    THE WOULi>-BE El-IPIRE BUILDER-. Tem Binoka, ruler of the State of Ahemama, comprising the isla-nds of Ahemama, Kuria, and Aranuka in the central Gilbert Islands, might well he identified in Pacific history as either a caring, benevolent despot, or a scheming, rutliless tyrant. But perhaps he may best be remembered for his attempts to found a Gilbertese empire. This was the principal ambition of his life, , which must have no doubt been vjhetted by the earlier achievements -•<7 '• oi* liis forbears, Kaitu and Uakeia, in subjugating all the southern islands, as well as those of the north save for Butaritj^ri and Little Makin, whose Uea (high chief) sought peace, or by the achievements of Kamehameha ir Hawaii or Poraare in Tahiti. And yet, despite all the advantages he enjoyed - a powerful and secure political and economic base in the centre of the archipelago, his assets of armaments and ships, the almost certain failure of the ragamuffin republics elsevjhere in the Gilberts to oppose him successfully, and the d.ebauched g^nd decadent royal State of Butaritari and Little Makin vjhich would probably have fallen into his la.p like overripe fruit if he had assailed it - he failed to achieve his overriding ambition. : It may well be v/ondered why this was so in view of all ! , ,i-7 the advantages he enjoyed. The answer must surely lie in the i manner of his rule in the State of Ahemama, and the consequent ^ distrust with which the inhabitants of the other islands 7"* viewed him. It is a curious fact that his advantages, no less then his mistakes, contributed to his failure to achieve his r • • overriding ambition.
  • Ciguatera and Other Marine Poisoning in the Gilbert Islands' M

    Ciguatera and Other Marine Poisoning in the Gilbert Islands' M

    Ciguatera and Other Marine Poisoning in the Gilbert Islands' M. J. COOPER 2 AMONG THE ANIMALS that live in the sea are was involved little.notice was taken. During and many that may be poisonous to eat; these ani­ after World W ar II attention was drawn to the mals include fish, sharks, crabs, molluscs, and problem, as there.were .many..rnore.people.in the · turtles. Of all marine animals the most impor­ Pacific who were poisoned by supposedly good tant are fish, which are for so many people an food fish, often in-areas where toxic fish had essential source of food. There are a number of been previously unknown. different ways in which teleost fish may be poi­ Although the symptoms of ciguatera poison­ sonous. Some fish are naturally poisonous; puf­ ing, the species of fish likely to-cause it, and fers for instance are always toxic. Some species many of the areas harboring toxic species have of fish can be poisonous at certain seasons; in been recorded, several aspects ''of the .problem Fiji there is a species of sardine which may be still remain to be solved. In spite of recent re­ deadly poisonous in the later months of the search into ciguatera poisoning,an'antidote to year. A third type of poisoning is found where the poison, a field test for distinguishing atoxic some fish are poisonous to eat when they are fish from a nontoxic one, the ,true nature of the caught on certain reefs or parts of a reef, and yet toxin, and the cause of the development of-eigua­ when caught on other parts of the same reef, or tera among fishes have not yet been discovered.
  • Nonouti Island 2007

    Nonouti Island 2007

    NONOUTI ISLAND 2007 SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE PRODUCED BY THE MINISTRY OF INTERNAL AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS, WITH FINANCIAL SUPPORT FROM THE UNITED NATION DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM AND KIRIBATI ADAPTATION PROJECT AND, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE SECRETARIAT OF THE PACIFIC COMMUNITY. Strengthening Decentralized Governance in Kiribati Project P.O. Box 75, Bairiki, Tarawa, Republic of Kiribati Telephone (686) 22741 or 22040, Fax: (686) 21133 NONOUTI ANTHEM E a tia Te Waa Canoe completed E a tia te Waa The Canoe is completed E a bobonga raoi In all ways required A matoa nako bwaina ngkai All materials well fixed and tightened Bwa a nang ka ieie ni biribiri Ready to sail and to run Inanon te nama i- Nonouti In the lagoon of Nonouti Tara aron butina ngkai See how it sails Tara aron birina ngkai See how it runs Tatanako iaon naona te naomoro Parting the waves rough as they are Ao ko a kan aki oaa mwina You will not be able to catch up with it Tina teirake ngaira i-Nonouti We will stand up all of us I-Nonouti Ma ni kanenei n tokaria And come in flocks to board the canoe Tina noria bwa butira ngkai To witness its swiftness E kare matoa angina As it flies with the firm wind - 2 - FOREWORD by the Honorable Amberoti Nikora, Minister of Internal and Social Affairs, July, 2007 I am honored to have this opportunity to introduce this revised and updated socio-economic profile for Nonouti island. The completion of this profile is the culmination of months of hard-work and collaborative effort of many people, Government agencies and development partners particularly those who have provided direct financial and technical assistance towards this important exercise.
  • Closing Lines Regulations 2014

    Closing Lines Regulations 2014

    ' I REPUBLIC OF KIRIBATI MARINE ZONES (DECLARATION) ACT 2011 (No. 4 of2011) CLOSING LINES REGULATIONS 2014 In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 14 of the Marine Zones (Declaration) Act 20 I I, the Minister for Fisheries, and Marine Resources hereby makes the following Regulations:- PART I . ) PRELIMINARY 1 Citation These Regulations may be cited as the Closing Lines Regulations 2014. 2 Interpretation "Internal Waters" means all waters on the landward side of the baseline of the territorial sea or any closing lines to the extent that those closing lines are outside the archipelagic baselines. PART II CLOSING LINES DELIMITING INTERNAL WATERS ) 3 Closing lines (1) The points between which straight closing lines are to be drawn are specified m Schedule 1, 2 and 3. ) (2) The tables in Schedule 1 specifies the closing lines for Butaritari, Marakei, Tarawa, Maiana, Abemama, Aranuka, Nonouti, Tabiteuea and Onotoa in the Gilbert Group. (3) The table in Schedule 2 specifies the closing lines for Kanton in the Phoenix Group. (4) The tables in Schedule 3 specify the closing lines for Tabuaeran (Fanning) and Kiritimati (Christmas) in the Line Group. 4 Guide to reading Schedules 1, 2 and 3 In the tables in Schedules 1, 2 and 3: (a) lines are generated by reference to points, (b) the first column sets out the point identifier and 1 . (c) the second and third columns set out the geographic coordinates for each point. PART ID GEOGRAPIDC COORDINATES POINTS 5 Geodetic framework In these Regulations, points defined by geographic coordinates are determined by reference to the World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84).
  • Kiribati Social and Economic Report 2008

    Kiribati Social and Economic Report 2008

    Pacific Studies Series Studies Pacific Pacific Studies Series Kiribati Social and Economic Report 2008 After two impressively peaceful decades, there are signs of a dangerous degree of complacency in Kiribati’s view of its domestic and external affairs. Forms of cultural and political resistance to change have thus been encouraged, and these are handicapping the nation’s response to development risks. Eight leading sources of development risk confronting Kiribati are identified, and these require understanding and appropriate responses in the form of well-formulated national development strategies. Based on a thorough assessment of risks, priorities, and options by sector in the main report, 16 policy actions are recommended as keys to the full range of responses that need to be formulated to cope with development risk. About the Asian Development Bank 2008 Report KiribatiEconomic and Social ADB’s vision is an Asia and Pacific region free of poverty. Its mission is to help its developing member countries substantially reduce poverty and improve the quality of life of their people. Despite the region’s many successes, it remains home to two thirds of the world’s poor: 1.8 billion people who live on less than $2 a day, with 903 million struggling on less than $1.25 a day. ADB is committed to reducing poverty through inclusive economic growth, environmentally sustainable growth, and regional integration. Based in Manila, ADB is owned by 67 members, including 48 from the region. Its main instruments for helping its developing member countries are policy dialogue, loans, equity investments, guarantees, grants, and technical assistance. Kiribati Social and Economic Report 2008 MANAGING DEVELOPMENT RISK Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines www.adb.org ISBN 978-971-561-777-2 Publication Stock No.