Hard Custom, Hard Dance : Social Organisation, (Un)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Tabiteuea South Social and Economic Report 2008 3 of 3
CHAPTER 5: TE TABOMOA – ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND UTILITIES A. ISLAND ECONOMY 5.1 Subsistence Economy A subsistence economy is one where people perform traditional activities to meet their individual and group needs for security, and have no reason to accumulate wealth except to ensure their future survival. In such a system, the concept of wealth does not exist hence there is a high degree of reliance on renewal and reproduction within the natural environment. The nature of the subsistence economy is reflected in the social organization of families, who join together to form large kinship groups (kaainga) which survive according to a set of rules and roles. Each member of a kaainga performs a different set of activities which are assigned on the basis of gender and age. It is important for the survival of the group that each member fulfils the roles and responsibilities assigned to him/her. Typical subsistent activities include fishing, toddy cutting, cultivation and harvesting of food crops mainly coconut, pandanus, breadfruit and bwabwai, weaving mats, making thatches, rolling string, fetching water, collecting firewood, making fish traps and hooks, cleaning and washing, cooking and house construction amongst others. Most of these activities are performed by the adult members of the family, while it falls upon the younger members to collect firewood and fetch water, clean the dishes, the compound, and assist the adult members to do the easy part of their chores. Unfortunately, subsistence living is slowly disappearing and being replaced by a cash economy where most subsistence activities are now not only catered towards subsistence living but also to generate income to pay for the basic necessities that are now found in the shops/stores. -
Pacific Islands - Online Climate Outlook Forum (OCOF) No
Pacific Islands - Online Climate Outlook Forum (OCOF) No. 91 Country Name: KIRIBATI TABLE 1: Monthly Rainfall Station (include data period) March 2015 January February Total 33%tile 67%tile Median Ranking 2015 2015 Rainfall Rainfall Rainfall (mm) Total Total (mm) (mm) Beru - - - 20.0 136.0 55.3 - (Jul1932-Nov 2014) Butaritari - - 429.1 189.0 402.0 281.5 55/77 (Jul 1931 -Mar 2015) Kanton - - - 19.6 57.4 27.2 - (Sep 1937 -Jun 2014) Kiritimati - 35.9 76.3 76.6 139.8 106.1 30/90 (Jan 1921-Mar 2015) Tarawa 229.4 287.1 434.2 113.1 262.7 171.0 60/66 (Jan 1950-Mar 2015) TABLE 2: Three-monthly Rainfall January 2015 to March 2015 [Please note that the data used in this verification should be sourced from table 3 of OCOF #87] Station Three-month 33%tile 67%tile Median Ranking Forecast probs.* Verification * Total Rainfall Rainfall Rainfall (include LEPS) (Consistent, (mm) (mm) (mm) Near-consistent Inconsistent? Beru - 143.1 493.0 280.6 - 8/39/ 53 - (33.3) Butaritari - 723.0 1119.0 902.7 - 20/35/ 45 - (14.8) Kanton - 40.7 171.2 110.8 - 17/24/ 59 - (30.8) Kiritimati - 160.1 297.9 221.6 - 18/29/ 53 - (31.6) Tarawa 950.7 348.3 923.5 647.9 46/66 14/38/ 48 Consistent (25.6) Period:* below normal /normal /above normal * Forecast is consistent when observed and predicted (tercile with the highest probability) categories coincide (are in the same tercile). Forecast is near-consistent when observed and predicted (tercile with the highest probability) differ by only one category (i.e. -
Kiribati Fourth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity
KIRIBATI FOURTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Aranuka Island (Gilbert Group) Picture by: Raitiata Cati Prepared by: Environment and Conservation Division - MELAD 20 th September 2010 1 Contents Acknowledgement ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Chapter 1: OVERVIEW OF BIODIVERSITY, STATUS, TRENDS AND THREATS .................................................... 8 1.1 Geography and geological setting of Kiribati ......................................................................................... 8 1.2 Climate ................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Status of Biodiversity ........................................................................................................................... 10 1.3.1 Soil ................................................................................................................................................. 12 1.3.2 Water Resources .......................................................................................................................... -
The Human Relationship with Our Ocean Planet
Commissioned by BLUE PAPER The Human Relationship with Our Ocean Planet LEAD AUTHORS Edward H. Allison, John Kurien and Yoshitaka Ota CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS: Dedi S. Adhuri, J. Maarten Bavinck, Andrés Cisneros-Montemayor, Michael Fabinyi, Svein Jentoft, Sallie Lau, Tabitha Grace Mallory, Ayodeji Olukoju, Ingrid van Putten, Natasha Stacey, Michelle Voyer and Nireka Weeratunge oceanpanel.org About the High Level Panel for a Sustainable Ocean Economy The High Level Panel for a Sustainable Ocean Economy (Ocean Panel) is a unique initiative by 14 world leaders who are building momentum for a sustainable ocean economy in which effective protection, sustainable production and equitable prosperity go hand in hand. By enhancing humanity’s relationship with the ocean, bridging ocean health and wealth, working with diverse stakeholders and harnessing the latest knowledge, the Ocean Panel aims to facilitate a better, more resilient future for people and the planet. Established in September 2018, the Ocean Panel has been working with government, business, financial institutions, the science community and civil society to catalyse and scale bold, pragmatic solutions across policy, governance, technology and finance to ultimately develop an action agenda for transitioning to a sustainable ocean economy. Co-chaired by Norway and Palau, the Ocean Panel is the only ocean policy body made up of serving world leaders with the authority needed to trigger, amplify and accelerate action worldwide for ocean priorities. The Ocean Panel comprises members from Australia, Canada, Chile, Fiji, Ghana, Indonesia, Jamaica, Japan, Kenya, Mexico, Namibia, Norway, Palau and Portugal and is supported by the UN Secretary-General’s Special Envoy for the Ocean. -
THE ISLANDS of TAHITI the Big Influencers in the South Pacific Ocean: French Polynesia
Special Report This supplement is printed and This report was produced distributed by the Los Angeles Times in partnership with Media Group. It does not involve the editorial staff of Los Angeles Times. One World Media. 2019 TAHITI COME DISCOVER THE TREASURES: Tahiti is one of the most coveted leisure destinations in the world! Find the Mana: in search of the Polynesian Soul also for business THE ISLANDS OF TAHITI The big influencers in the South Pacific Ocean: French Polynesia ocated in the center of the “Another very real asset is our people”, Southern Pacific Ocean, Tahiti adds President Fritch, “The liveliness of our is the largest island of the people and our deep cultural roots make Windward group of French this country one of a kind, with men and Polynesia. Featuring world women eager to be producers, or partners, renowned black sand beaches or workers”. and clear blue seas, it has long been the One of the most difficult challenges Lcultural, economic and political center of the the country faces today has to do with country, as well as a hotspot for international modernization. In a global economy where tourism. technology plays an important role, many Having previously been a French colony, developing countries are struggling to keep today French Polynesia is considered France’s up with the pace. “Digital networks have only Country Abroad, entitling the territory become as important to countries as are to have more independence, with their own roads, ports and airports”, says President President and complete control over their Fritch, “This is why we are improving our economy and currency, the CPF Franc. -
Kiribati 2005 Census Data And, Where Possible, It Presents Comparisons with the 2000 and Earlier Census Data
Kiribati 2005 Census Volume 2: Analytical Report January 2007 CONTENTS page Foreword vii Acknowledgement viii Summary of main indicators ix Executive summary xi 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 POPULATION TREND, COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE 2 2.1 Population trend 2 2.2 Population composition 5 2.3 Population structure 6 3 DEMOGRAPHIC COMPONENTS 12 3.1 Fertility 12 3.2 Mortality 19 3.3 Migration 26 3.3.1 Internal migration 26 3.3.2 International migration 30 4 SOCIAL CHARACTERISTICS 33 4.1 Marital status 33 4.2 Religion 36 4.3 Health 37 4.3.1 Smoking tobacco 37 4.3.2 Drinking alcohol 38 4.4 Educational characteristics 40 4.4.1 School enrolment 40 4.4.2 Educational attainment 40 4.4.3 Educational qualification 42 4.5 Labor market activity 43 4.5.1 Introduction 43 4.5.2 Employed - cash workers and village workers 44 4.5.3 Labour force participation rate and Employment-population ratio 4.5.4 Employed cash workers by work status 4.5.5 Employed cash workers by industry group 46 4.5.6 Employed cash workers by occupational group 46 4.5.7 Unemployed 47 4.5.8 Not in the labor force 48 5 HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS 50 5.1 Household size 50 5.2 Household composition 53 5.3 Household amenities and appliances 54 5.3.1 Private households by main source of drinking water, Kiribati, 2005 54 5.3.2 Private households by type of toilet facility used, Kiribati, 2005 54 5.3.3 Private households by source of lighting, Kiribati, 2005 54 5.3.4 Private households and availability of capital goods, Kiribati, 2005 58 i CONTENTS (continue) page 6 POPULATION PROJECTIONS 59 6.1 Projection -
Polynesian Dance in the Hawaiian Tourist Industry In
POLYNESIAN DANCE IN THE HAWAIIAN TOURIST INDUSTRY IN WAIKIKI, 1981 A Plan B Paper Submitted to the Graduate Division of the University of Hawai'i in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts In Pacific Islands Studies May 1986 by Ricalda Renee Uchiyama Project Committee: Barbara B. Smith, Chairman Judy Van Zile Deborah Waite HEMO TO: Dr. Kiste FROM: Barbara Smith 17/W Attached is FORH VI for Ricalda Renee Uchiyama. The signatures indicate approval of her PLAN B paper. (If, in fact, she still has another requirement(s) for the degree, the date on the title page of this paper could be changed if she doesn't 'make it' for May degree award. I have a few sheets of the bond paper on which the deposit copy is xeroxed.) Table of Contents Chapter I: Introduction ••.••.•. .. 1 1.1 Purposes and Methods .. .. ... 2 1.2 Guide to Presentation •• 4 Note to Chapter I 6 Chapter II: The Organization of a polynesian Show ••• .... · .. 7 2.1 Shows Included in This Study. • • 7 2.1.1 "A" Kalo's South Sea Review •••• 7 2.1.2 "B" Kamoiwa • 7 2.1.3 "e" Kodak Hula Show · · · · · · 8 2.1.4 "D" Palani's Polynesian Extravaganza . · · ·· · · 9 2.1.5 "E" The Royal Hawaiian Lu'au. · 9 2.1.6 lip II Tavana's Polynesian Spectacular . · · · ·· · 9 2.1.7 "G" Tihati's South Sea Spectacular •• •• •. 10 2.1.8 "H" The Young People's Hula Show. ........... 10 2.2 High-Budget, Low-Budget, and Mixed Mixed-Budget Shows •••••••• • 11 2.2.1 High-Budget Shows •• 11 2.2.2 Low-Budget Shows •• • 12 2.2.3 Mixed-Budget Shows • • 13 2.3 Selection and Training of Dancers . -
Kiribati Country Report to the Conference of Parties (COP) of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)
REPUBLIC OF KIRIBATI Kiribati Country Report to The Conference of Parties (COP) of The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) 2007 Prepared by Environment and Conservation Division Ministry of Environment, Lands and Agricultural Development Foreword By the Minister of Environment, Lands and Agricultural Development It is with considerable pleasure that I forward this document to the Conference of the Parties and the United Nations Development Programme. The document represents an important step in the desire of the Republic of Kiribati to protect the biodiversity and promote the sustainable utilization of the marine and terrestrial resources of Kiribati. I feel this is an appropriate approach to take towards biodiversity conservation in Kiribati. Conservation of biological diversity and the environment has been part of the life of the I-Kiribati ever since the first settlement of the Kiribati atolls. The new international concept of biodiversity conservation has highlighted the increasing degree of human influence on nature. Most of the damage is caused by the increasing demand for consumed goods and energy which is exacerbated by Kiribati’s rapid increase in population. Conservation is for the people and should be implemented by the people. Community consultations and participatory efforts of local communities have provided invaluable contributions to the formulation of this document. The multi-sectoral composition of the members of the Steering Committee and Planning team, and the collaborative efforts between stakeholders, both public and private, indicates a widespread belief of responsibility towards the conservation of biodiversity. The involvement of other Government departments and ministries, together with other environmental programs such as the National Biosafety Framework (NBF), Persistant Organic Pollutants (POPs), International Waters Project Kiribati (IWPK) and National Adaptation Plan of Action (NAPA) have enriched the scope of the project in all directions. -
Economic and Financial Analysis
Outer Islands Transport Infrastructure Investment Project (RRP KIR 53043) ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS A. General 1. The proposed project will finance several activities to improve the safety of interisland navigation and provide resilient outer island access infrastructure for four outer islands in Kiribati. The project scope includes a hydrographic survey to establish digital chart coverage of the outer islands to make navigation safer in the country’s waters in accordance with international conventions and small-scale maritime interventions, which are needed to improve the delivery of basic goods and services to the outer islands. The project will finance rehabilitation of causeways in these islands to reduce transport costs within the islands and improve resilience to climate change and disaster risks. 2. The four islands considered for the project investment are Abaiang, Nonouti, Beru, and Tabiteuea South. Kiribati’s 33 islands are scattered over a large area of central and western Pacific Ocean and constrained by geographic isolation, a small population, and high transport and shipping costs. The nation depends on maritime transport to import essential manufactured goods, export agriculture and fishery products, and connect and resupply outer island communities. Only two ports are capable of handling international shipping—one in Betio and the other in Kiritimati and the outer islands, which are served by domestic (interisland) shipping. Safe navigation aids are limited and defined island access infrastructure nonexistent. The proposed project will tackle these constraints and ease safer access to the outer islands. 3. Standard demand analysis to calculate the project benefits is not applicable for some project components. Therefore, cost-effectiveness analysis or cost–benefit analysis was used for individual subprojects, depending on whether the benefits of the subproject were quantifiable or not.1 For example, the installation of aid to navigation (ATON) is essential but does not lead to direct economic benefit or reduced operating costs. -
Ciguatera and Other Marine Poisoning in the Gilbert Islands' M
Ciguatera and Other Marine Poisoning in the Gilbert Islands' M. J. COOPER 2 AMONG THE ANIMALS that live in the sea are was involved little.notice was taken. During and many that may be poisonous to eat; these ani after World W ar II attention was drawn to the mals include fish, sharks, crabs, molluscs, and problem, as there.were .many..rnore.people.in the · turtles. Of all marine animals the most impor Pacific who were poisoned by supposedly good tant are fish, which are for so many people an food fish, often in-areas where toxic fish had essential source of food. There are a number of been previously unknown. different ways in which teleost fish may be poi Although the symptoms of ciguatera poison sonous. Some fish are naturally poisonous; puf ing, the species of fish likely to-cause it, and fers for instance are always toxic. Some species many of the areas harboring toxic species have of fish can be poisonous at certain seasons; in been recorded, several aspects ''of the .problem Fiji there is a species of sardine which may be still remain to be solved. In spite of recent re deadly poisonous in the later months of the search into ciguatera poisoning,an'antidote to year. A third type of poisoning is found where the poison, a field test for distinguishing atoxic some fish are poisonous to eat when they are fish from a nontoxic one, the ,true nature of the caught on certain reefs or parts of a reef, and yet toxin, and the cause of the development of-eigua when caught on other parts of the same reef, or tera among fishes have not yet been discovered. -
The Metabolic Demands of Culturally-Specific
THE METABOLIC DEMANDS OF CULTURALLY-SPECIFIC POLYNESIAN DANCES by Wei Zhu A thesis submitted in partial FulFillment oF the requirements For the degree of Master oF Science in Health and Human Development MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana November 2016 ©COPYRIGHT by Wei Zhu 2016 All Rights Reserved ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1 Historical Background ............................................................................................... 1 Statement oF Purpose ............................................................................................... 3 SigniFicance oF Study ................................................................................................. 3 Hypotheses ............................................................................................................... 4 Limitations ................................................................................................................ 5 Delimitations ............................................................................................................. 5 2. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ..................................................................................... 6 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 6 Health Status in NHOPI ............................................................................................. 6 PA – A Strategy -
Moorea,Day 2
一言言作 叉 aノ1・ta IA ORAINA(YO-RAH-NAH)=HELLO MOOREA,DAY 2 FRIDAY, SOCIETY ISLANDS, FRENCH POLYNESIA jANUARY 29, 2016 ALLABOARD 4:30PM M/S PAUL GAUGUIN ARRIVAL PAPEETE フ:30PM Sensualanddynamic・lncrediblyrapidhipmovements,amoreorbarkskirtnashingaround a dancer's legsin a blur of speed, the sound ofdrums dominating dancers and audience alike.Then slower, wilh a ukulele bringing a melody and voices singing while ripplingj supple hands tella story. Fragrant flowers,adoming the long black hairof the vahine, geometric and stylizedtattoos tra(:ingthe muscles of the warrior-liketane. These are the sights andsounds that have made ・Ori Tahiti or Tahitian dance famous throughout the world. 仙edan(e forms of the difFerent Polynesian lslands may well be as old as the Polynesians themselves, Polynesians whom many archeologists pla(e among the French Polynesian island archipelagoes around the time of Christ,and on the island of Tahiti itselfsome l,200 years ago, Be(ause the Polynesian cultures have always been oral ones, with primarily ephemeral art forms, and because thispassing of knowledge was badly shattered by the arrivalof Europeans and the European diseases that laid waste to the population, wedo not know for sure. We do know that these dances shocked, delighted,and awed the first Europeans to arrivein the mid,1700s.They certainlyappalled the missionaries who arrived in l797,and as these missionaries gained power and innuence, the dan(es were outlawed, and went underground for well over a century・ Although much was(ertainly lost during this period, dance was saved from oblivion by those who dan(ed in secret,and by those from islands farther from the center of European innuence.lnthe1950s,a renaissance of Tahitian dance began, led by Madeleine Moua, who restored to 'OriTahitiitsdignityandprideofplaceatthecenterofTahitianculture.