DOCSLIB.ORG

Preliminary Synopsis of Oral History Interviews at Rawaki Village And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Preliminary Synopsis of Oral History Interviews at Rawaki Village and Nikumaroro Village Solomon Islands by The International Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery (TIGHAR) November 26, 2011 Nikumaroro Village Preliminary Synopsis of Oral History Interviews, Solomon Islands 2011 From August 20-30, 2011, John Clauss, Nancy Farrell, Karl Kern, Baoro Laxton Koraua and Gary F. Quigg, of The International Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery (TIGHAR) conducted a research expedition in the Solomon Islands consisting of oral history interviews with former residents of Nikumaroro Island (Kiribati) as well as a thorough examination of relevant archival materials in the Solomon Islands National Archives. This preliminary synopsis provides an initial overview of the research conducted by TIGHAR as a part of further testing the Earhart Project’s Nikumaroro Hypothesis. A more detailed report will follow, when the audio and video recordings have been completely transcribed and analyzed. Procedures Upon arrival in Honiara (Guadalcanal), Clauss, Farrell, Kern and Quigg were met by Koraua at the airport. Mr. Koraua is a resident of Honiara and the son of Paul Laxton. Mr. Laxton, who served as Assistant Lands Commissioner for the Gilbert and Ellice Islands Colony, was the British Colonial Service officer in charge of the settlement on Gardner Island (Nikumaroro Island) for several years following World War II. Born on Nikumaroro Island in 1960, Mr. Koraua was relocated to the Solomon Islands along with the entire population of the Nikumaroro Island colony in 1963. Mr. Koraua was crucial to the success of the expedition, acting as interpreter, logistics coordinator, ambassador and gracious host. Further, Mr. Koraua provided for our transportation between the outer islands of Kohinggo and Vaghena aboard his boat, the M/V Temauri. The team spent the first three days of the expedition in Honiara gathering provisions for the upcoming voyage on Temauri, testing audio and video recording equipment, and conducting archival research in the National Archives. Despite a full day and one half day reviewing hundreds of documents of the Western Pacific High Commission, no pertinent information on Gardner Island (Nikumaroro) or other subjects related to the Earhart Project was found. On Tuesday, August 23, the team flew from Honiara (Guadalcanal) to Munda (New Georgia) via Solomon Airlines to begin field research. Arriving in the afternoon, a local truck driver provided transit along the coast road to the harbor at Noro where Temauri was docked. Once the team was aboard, Temauri motored across the narrow harbor to Rawaki Village (Kohinggo). Although sundown was nearing the team elected to go ashore on Temauri’s dinghy, introduce ourselves to the village residents, and meet with our first interview subjects. We were welcomed into the home of Taniana and Ona (Tionae) Bourika who invited us to gather in the family maneaba adjacent to their home. Having settled in the manaeba, the team explained the purpose of the visit by kerosene lamp light. Through Mr. Koraua’s interpretation Taniana and Ona graciously agreed to be interviewed the next morning. Spending the night aboard Temauri, anchored just off the village, the team went ashore at 830am to conduct the first interviews on Wednesday, August 24. Taniana and Ona had invited Ona’s life-long best friend Ritema Tapweaitu to join us, and the team interviewed all three subjects. After spending six hours conducting interviews the team departed Rawaki, and, aboard Temauri, motored back across the harbor to Noro to take on additional fuel for the twelve hour voyage to Nikumaroro Village. 1 M/V Temauri Enduring rough seas on the overnight crossing from Noro (New Georgia) to Nikumaroro (Vaghena) through the New Georgia Sound, the team was eager to get ashore Thursday morning, August 25. Once in Nikumaroro Village, Mr. Koraua led the team to the community maneaba where we met our interview subjects: Aberaam Abera, Teauama Abera (wife of Aberaam), Boraing Abera (brother of Aberaam), and Matakite Amerike. Our final interview subject in this village, Teinamati Amerike (brother of Matakite), is unable to walk so the team interviewed him in his home after conducting the interviews in the manaeba. Upon completing all interviews the team went back aboard Temauri to spend the night before motoring three hours to Kagua Island in the morning to catch the Solomons Airlines flight back to Honiara on Friday, August 26. The team spent the remaining three days in Honiara. During this time the interview recordings were checked, the collection of artifacts on exhibit at the Solomon Islands National Museum was reviewed for any objects that may have found their way from Nikumaroro Island, meetings were held with the Undersecretary of the Ministry of Education as well as the United States Consul to the Solomon Islands, and two interviews were conducted with former Nikumaroro Island resident Joseph Nemaia on August 27 and 28 at his home. Having completed all expedition initiatives the team departed Honiara for Los Angeles on Tuesday, August 30. Summary of Interviews Individuals interviewed during this expedition were former residents of Nikumaroro Island (formerly Gardner Island) in the Phoenix Islands who were relocated to the Solomon Islands in 1963 when the British colony on Gardner Island was abandoned. All individuals interviewed were selected by Mr. Koraua as being the oldest residents in Rawaki Village and Nikumaroro Village (with the exception of Mr. Nemaia of Honiara). These elders are the only residents of the villages with memories of their time on Nikumaroro Island. Mr. Koraua himself was born on Nikumaroro Island in 1960, emigrated with the 2 former colony residents to the Solomons in 1963, and grew up in Nikumaroro Village on Vaghena Island before moving to Honiara as an adult. All interviews (totaling approximately eight hours) were conducted through translation by Mr. Koraua. The TIGHAR team asked questions of the informants in English and Mr. Koraua would then re-state the questions in I-Kiribati (Gilbertese). The informants (with the exceptions of Mr. Teinamati Amerike and Mr. Joseph Nemaia who responded in English), would then respond in I-Kiribati and Mr. Koraua would re-state the answer in English. While the younger generations of village residents speak English, Pidgin and I-Kiribati, the older village residents speak I-Kiribati predominantly and usually have a limited understanding and usage of English. Interview with Aberaam and Teauama Abera, August 25, 2011, Nikumaroro Village A video camera (with audio) and two audio recorders were used for each interview. Clauss, Kern and Farrell operated the recording equipment. Farrell took copious hand-written notes of each interview. Quigg led the questioning, with all other team members assisting with follow-up queries. With the exceptions of Mr. Teinamati Amerike and Mr. Joseph Nemaia, who were interviewed in their homes, all other informants were interviewed in a maneaba. In the I-Kiribati culture, a maneaba is an open structure consisting of poles and a roof of either palm fronds or corrugated metal used as a gathering place for social, civic, and religious purposes. Questions were developed to avoid leading the informants, so that answers would be objective. To further guard against potential contamination of information given in answers, the team strictly avoided 3 mentioning the Earhart Project, aircraft, pilots, Amelia Earhart or anything associated with work conducted by TIGHAR on Nikumaroro Island until the last interview had been completed. The following interview summaries provide only highlights relevant to the Earhart Project’s Nikumaroro Hypothesis from each recorded conversation; more details will be provided in a complete report when all recordings have been carefully reviewed. Mr. Taniana Bourika, age 74, Rawaki Village August 24, 2011 Taniana came to Nikumaroro Island with his parents in 1945 when he was eight years of age and remained there until the colony was abandoned in 1963. Most interesting among Taniana’s memories of Nikumaroro Island was his recollection of finding shiny metal debris, including what he described as a door (curved) on the beach of Aukaraime South, and just inland of the beach. Other interesting information from Taniana focused on his activities on what he called the far side of the island. In this area, Taniana described how he and other boys would climb Buka trees to catch Frigate birds. To prepare the birds for a meal, the wings, feet and heads were cut off before being placed on a fire or in an earthen oven. Taniana also explained that he and his comrades would hunt turtles on the far side of the island and butcher them there, using everything from the carcass except the bones and shell. When Taniana and his friends would stay overnight on the far side of the island, he explained that they did not use a single fire pit over and over, but would move the location of their fire. Ms. Ona (Tione) Bourika and Ritema Tapweaitu, ages 74/74, Rawaki Village August 24, 2011 Ona and Ritema were interviewed together, as they were life-long best friends from the time they were young girls on Nikumaroro Island. Ritema arrived at Nikumaroro Island in 1945, and Ona arrived in 1952. Both remained on the island until the 1963 relocation. The women shared that they heard about the discovery of the shiny metal Taniana and other boys had found on the island, but explained that girls were not allowed to explore the island. They also mentioned they had heard rumors about bones being found on the island, but had never seen any bones. Team with Ona Bourika, Ritema Tapweaitu and Taniana Bourika, August 24, 2011, Rawaki Village 4 Mr. Aberaam Abera and Ms. Teauama Abera, ages 71/68, Nikumaroro Village August 25, 2011 Husband and wife, Aberaam and Teauama were interviewed together. Both were born on Nikumaroro Island, Aberaam in 1940 and Teauama in 1943.
Recommended publications
  • Kiribati Fourth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity

    Kiribati Fourth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity

    KIRIBATI FOURTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Aranuka Island (Gilbert Group) Picture by: Raitiata Cati Prepared by: Environment and Conservation Division - MELAD 20 th September 2010 1 Contents Acknowledgement ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Chapter 1: OVERVIEW OF BIODIVERSITY, STATUS, TRENDS AND THREATS .................................................... 8 1.1 Geography and geological setting of Kiribati ......................................................................................... 8 1.2 Climate ................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Status of Biodiversity ........................................................................................................................... 10 1.3.1 Soil ................................................................................................................................................. 12 1.3.2 Water Resources ..........................................................................................................................
  • Participatory Diagnosis of Coastal Fisheries for North Tarawa And

    Participatory Diagnosis of Coastal Fisheries for North Tarawa And

    Photo credit: Front cover, Aurélie Delisle/ANCORS Aurélie cover, Front credit: Photo Participatory diagnosis of coastal fisheries for North Tarawa and Butaritari island communities in the Republic of Kiribati Participatory diagnosis of coastal fisheries for North Tarawa and Butaritari island communities in the Republic of Kiribati Authors Aurélie Delisle, Ben Namakin, Tarateiti Uriam, Brooke Campbell and Quentin Hanich Citation This publication should be cited as: Delisle A, Namakin B, Uriam T, Campbell B and Hanich Q. 2016. Participatory diagnosis of coastal fisheries for North Tarawa and Butaritari island communities in the Republic of Kiribati. Penang, Malaysia: WorldFish. Program Report: 2016-24. Acknowledgments We would like to thank the financial contribution of the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research through project FIS/2012/074. We would also like to thank the staff from the Secretariat of the Pacific Community and WorldFish for their support. A special thank you goes out to staff of the Kiribati’s Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources Development, Ministry of Internal Affairs, Ministry of Environment, Land and Agricultural Development and to members of the five pilot Community-Based Fisheries Management (CBFM) communities in Kiribati. 2 Contents Executive summary 4 Introduction 5 Methods 9 Diagnosis 12 Summary and entry points for CBFM 36 Notes 38 References 39 Appendices 42 3 Executive summary In support of the Kiribati National Fisheries Policy 2013–2025, the ACIAR project FIS/2012/074 Improving Community-Based
  • Earhart's Final Resting Place Believed Found

    Earhart's Final Resting Place Believed Found

    Earhart's Final Resting Place Believed Found Legendary aviatrix Amelia Earhart most likely died on an uninhabited tropical island in the southwestern Pacific republic of Kiribati, according to researchers at The International Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery (TIGHAR). Tall, slender, blonde and brave, Earhart disappeared while flying over the Pacific Ocean on July 2, 1937 in a record attempt to fly around the world at the equator. Her final resting place has long been a mystery. For years, Richard Gillespie, TIGHAR's executive director and author of the book "Finding Amelia," and his crew have been searching the Nikumaroro island for evidence of Earhart. A tiny coral atoll, Nikumaroro was some 300 miles southeast of Earhart's target destination, Howland Island. A number of artifacts recovered by TIGHAR would suggest that Earhart and her navigator, Fred Noonan, made a forced landing on the island's smooth, flat coral reef. According to Gillespie, who is set to embark on a new $500,000 Nikumaroro expedition next summer, the two became castaways and eventually died there. "We know that in 1940 British Colonial Service officer Gerald Gallagher recovered a partial skeleton of a castaway on Nikumaroro. Unfortunately, those bones have now been lost," Gillespie said. The archival record by Gallagher suggests that the bones were found in a remote area of the island, in a place that was unlikely to have been seen during an aerial search. A woman's shoe, an empty bottle and a sextant box whose serial numbers are consistent with a type known to have been carried by Noonan were all found near the site where the bones were discovered.
  • Open Vanstone Gavin Poritesgradient.Pdf

    Open Vanstone Gavin Poritesgradient.Pdf

    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY THE EFFECT OF A NUTRIENT GRADIENT ON THE PORITES-LITHOPHAGA SYSTEM IN THE PHOENIX ISLANDS GAVIN VANSTONE SPRING 2017 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in Biology with honors in Biology Reviewed and approved* by the following: Iliana Baums Associate Professor of Biology Thesis Supervisor Benoît Dayrat Associate Professor of Biology Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT Excess nutrients on coral reefs can lead to increased bioerosion by boring animals, such as mollusks and sponges. Bioerosion leads to weaker coral skeletons that are susceptible to fragmentation by both abiotic and biotic factors. The Phoenix Islands are an isolated archipelago found in the central Pacific Ocean in which the northern islands, Kanton and Enderbury, lie in the path of the Equatorial Undercurrent (EUC) creating periods of upwelling around the islands. This creates a nutrient gradient across the northern group and the southern group of islands. Two morphologically similar reef building corals, Porites evermanni and Porites lobata, were differentially susceptible to bioerosion by Lithophaga mussels, which can increase asexual reproduction rates by fragmentation. Nine of the ten islands studied here exhibited mainly sexual reproduction. Our results suggest a different trophic interaction in the Phoenix Islands than seen in the Eastern Tropical Pacific, where fragmentation by triggerfish
  • CBD Strategy and Action Plan

    CBD Strategy and Action Plan

    Kiribati National Biodiversity Strategies and Actions Plan 2005 NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGIES AND ACTIONS PLAN (KIRITIMATI ISLAND 2005) PREPARED BY ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT, LANDS AND AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT October, 2006. 1En vironment & Conservation Division- MELAD Kiribati National Biodiversity Strategies and Actions Plan 2005 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Biodiversity in this context means all terrestrial and marine ecosystems, all plants and animal species and varieties found in these ecosystems including the knowledge, uses, beliefs and language that the people of Kiribati have in relation to their ecosystems and species. Biodiversity Conservation is always considered along with sustainable use. It has been confirmed that the present state of biodiversity in the Republic of Kiribati is being degraded socially, economically, politically and even judicially. As a nation with very limited resources we just cannot afford to sit back and let this serious degradation continues. If the biodiversity is not conserved or used on a sustainable basis, and if traditional sustainable management practices, and the knowledge and relevant language are not maintained or strengthened then future development would not be able to sustain the people in the long term. The main key in the whole process is the resource owners and users at the community level who hold the long- lasting key to biodiversity conservation. The development of Kiribati National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (K-NBSAP) has been highly consultative. The process of collecting data and information has been guided by the Steering Committee, a multi-disciplinary committee that comprises of representatives from different stakeholders. The diverse representation of the Steering Committee and the collaborative incentive of the grassroots people reflected a shift towards a multi-sectoral collaboration and the need to establish stronger social and institutional infrastructure to make local community co-management actually work in practice.
  • Cepf Final Project Completion Report

    Cepf Final Project Completion Report

    CEPF FINAL PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT Organization Legal Name: Pacific Expeditions Limited (plus Eco Oceania sub-grant) Habitat Restoration of priority islands in the Phoenix Islands Project Title: Protected Area (PIPA) Date of Report: 19 Feb 2013 Dr Graham Wragg (and Dr Ray Pierce) Report Author and Contact PO Box 3063, Rarotonga, Cook Islands Information Email: [email protected] CEPF Region: Polynesia-Micronesia Strategic Direction: 1. Prevent, control, and eradicate invasive species in key biodiversity areas Grant Amount $ 292,000 Project Dates : November 1, 2009 to December 31, 2012 Implementation Partners for this Project (please explain the level of involvement for each partner): Pacific Expeditions Ltd (Dr Graham Wragg): Overall financial responsibility and grant holder. Shared logistical planning with Eco Oceania. Eco Oceania (Dr Ray Pierce): Lead agency for Science, Liaison with Kiribati, Planning of Eradications in July 2011 and sourcing finance for future invasive species work at the Phoenix Islands. Conservation Impacts Please explain/describe how your project has contributed to the implementation of the CEPF ecosystem profile. Please summarize the overall results/impact of your project. Project Approach (500 words) Background The Phoenix Islands are a World Heritage Site and also have many other international designations including Key Biodiversity Area and Important Bird Area reflecting the exceptionally high diversity and abundance of marine and terrestrial biota. The terrestrial values include globally important seabird colonies spanning 19 species of petrels, storm-petrels, frigatebirds, boobies, tropicbirds and terns, including the Endangered Phoenix petrel and white-throated storm-petrel which are largely confined to Rawaki. However, a fundamental problem facing these seabirds (and terrestrial biodiversity in general) has been the presence of 1-3 invasive vertebrate species on each of the 8 islands, with only Rawaki not having been invaded by rats (Table 1).
  • Kiribati Background Information

    Kiribati Background Information

    Contents Executive Summary......................................................................................................................................... i List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................... iii 1.0. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Kiribati Background Information ............................................................................................................. 2 3.0 Biodiversity in Kiribati ............................................................................................................................. 3 4.0 Analysis of the Causes and Consequences of Biodiversity Loss ............................................................. 6 4.1 Causes of Biodiversity Loss ................................................................................................................. 6 4.2 Consequences of Biodiversity Loss ...................................................................................................... 8 5.0 National, Constitutional, Legal and Institutional Framework .................................................................. 8 5.1 Legislation ............................................................................................................................................ 8 5.2 Relevant Policies and Plans ...............................................................................................................
  • Sea Turtles of the Phoenix Islands, 2000-2002

    Sea Turtles of the Phoenix Islands, 2000-2002

    SEA TURTLES OF THE PHOENIX ISLANDS, 2000-2002 BY DAVID OBURA,1 SANGEETA MANGUBHAI,1 AND AUSTEN YOSHINAGA2 INTRODUCTION Balazs (1973) has written the only recent report on marine turtles of the Phoenix Islands, summarizing a small literature from observations in the 19th and 20th Century, his own observations on a 7-day trip to Kanton atoll in 1973 and anecdotal information from residents on Kanton Island. At that time only green turtles (listed as Chelonia sp.) were confirmed to be present in the Phoenix Islands with additional reports of a turtle “with distinct ridges on the carapace” which Balazs did not venture to name. Balazs notes that reviews at the time did not list the Phoenix Islands within the distribution records of turtles across the Pacific. Balasz summarized that marine turtles were seen commonly throughout the year in the Phoenix Islands, listed for various different islands by different references and observers including Enderbury, Orona, Manra, Nikumaroro, Birnie. He cited no reported turtle activity on Rawaki (Phoenix) and McKean. Nesting was noted to occur throughout the year with a peak of nesting in October and November and particularly high nesting activity was noted for November 1972 on Kanton. He documented old and new turtle tracks and nest pits and observed two females digging nests on one site on Kanton. In a week on Kanton, he identified four areas around the outer perimeter of the atoll rim between 0.5 to 2.2 km in length where nesting was concentrated. Not all apparently suitable beaches showed nesting activity tentatively related to surface alteration and construction during the Second World War.
  • The Search for Amelia Earhart: Expedition to Nikumaroro

    The Search for Amelia Earhart: Expedition to Nikumaroro

    The Search for Amelia Earhart: Expedition to Nikumaroro Presented by by Lew Toulmin, Ph.D., F.R.G.S. September 2017 Llewellyn “Lew” Toulmin, Ph.D. • Former Chair, Section on Emergency Management, American Society for Public Administration • Consultant to 20+ US Federal agencies and 30+ foreign countries • Fellow of the Royal Geographical Society • Expeditions in search of missing aircraft, persons, battlefields, plantations and towns • Ph.D. in public administration & economics • Traveled to 144 of the 196 countries on Earth • Co-founder, Missing Aircraft Search Team WHO WHEN WHERE Ambrose Bierce, writer 1913 Juarez (?), Mexico Percy Fawcett, explorer 1925 Amazonia, Brazil Judge Joseph Crater 1930 New York City Amelia Earhart, aviator 1937 Pacific Ocean Richard Halliburton, 1939 North Pacific adventurer Gertrude Tompkins, 1944 California near LAX WW II WASP pilot Prof. Jesus de Galindez 1956 New York City Jim Thompson, ex-OSS, 1967 north central Malaysia CIA asset, “Silk King” D. B. Cooper, air pirate 1971 Washington State, USA Jimmy Hoffa, labor 1975 near Detroit, MI leader Today we will cover these topics: The exciting life of Amelia Earhart (AE) The disappearance and search Theories re the disappearance Expedition to Nikumaroro Evidence for Niku Conclusions Nikumaroro island, Rep. of Kiribati Flag of the Republic of Kiribati Moonlight Bungalow, Cameron Highlands The Exciting Life of Amelia Earhart Tomboy “Milly” born 1897, Atchison, KS… …schooled in Chicago & Philly • 1919: Nurse’s aide • 1920: first air ride • 1921: pilot’s license
  • Malden Island, Kiribati – Feasibility of Cat Eradication for the Recovery of Seabirds

    Malden Island, Kiribati – Feasibility of Cat Eradication for the Recovery of Seabirds

    MALDEN ISLAND, KIRIBATI – FEASIBILITY OF CAT ERADICATION FOR THE RECOVERY OF SEABIRDS By Ray Pierce, Derek Brown, Aataieta Ioane and Kautabuki Kamatie December 2015 Frontispiece - Grey backed Terns at a colony in Sesuvium and Portulaca near the main Malden lagoon. 1 CONTENTS MAP OF KIRIBATI 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 ACRONYMS AND KEY DEFIMITIONS 4 MAP OF MALDEN 4 1 INTRODUCTION 5 2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF MALDEN ISLAND 5 2.1 Geology and landforms 5 2.2 Climate and weather 6 2.3 Human use 6 2.4 Vegetation and flora 7 3 FAUNA 10 3.1 Breeding seabirds 10 3.2 Visiting seabirds 13 3.3 Shorebirds 13 3.4 Other indigenous fauna 14 4. INVASIVE SPECIES AND THEIR IMPACTS 15 4.1 Past invasives 15 4.2 House mouse 16 4.3 Feral house cat 17 5 ERADICATION BENEFITS, RISKS, COSTS AND FEASIBILITY 20 5.1 Benefits of cat eradication 20 5.2 Benefits of mouse eradication 20 5.3 Eradication Feasibility 21 5.4 Risks 24 5.5 Estimated Costs 25 6. Preliminary Recommendations 28 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 28 REFERENCES 28 APPENDICES – Flora species, Seabird status, Fly-ons, Pelagic counts 32 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study describes the biodiversity values of Malden Island, Kiribati, and assesses the potential benefits, feasibility and costs of removing key invasive species. Malden is relatively pest-free, but two significant invasive species are present - feral house cats and house mice. We believe that the most cost-effective and beneficial conservation action in the short term for Kiribati is to undertake a cat eradication programme. This would take pressure off nearly all of the 11 species of seabirds which currently breed at Malden, and allow for the natural and/or enhanced recovery of a further 5-6 species, including the Phoenix Petrel (EN).
  • Kiribati (A.K.A. Gilbertese) Helps for Reading Vital Records

    Kiribati (A.K.A. Gilbertese) Helps for Reading Vital Records

    Kiribati (a.k.a. Gilbertese) Helps for Reading Vital Records Alan Marchant, 29 January 2021 Alphabet • Kiribati uses only the following letters. All other letters are rare before the late 20th century, except in foreign names. A B E I K M N NG O R T U W • The letter T is very common, especially at the beginning of names. The uppercase cursive T can sometimes be confused with the unlikely P or S. Lower-case t is often written with the cross-bar shifted right, detached from the vertical stroke. • Lower-case g is the only letter with a down-stroke. It exists only in the combination ng (equivalent to ñ). • The cursive lower-case n and u are about equally common and are not easily distinguished; lower-case n and r are more distinguishable. Months English and Kiribati forms may exist in the same document. January Tianuari July Turai February Beberuare August Aokati March Mati September Tebetembwa April Eberi October Okitobwa May Mei November Nobembwa June Tun December Ritembwa Terminology Kiribati words can have many alternate meanings. This list identifies usages encountered in the headings of vital records. aba makoro island ma and abana resident maiu life aika of, who makuri occupation aine female mane, mwane male akea none (n.b. not mare married a name) aki not mate dead ana her, his matena death ao and, with mwenga home araia list na. item number aran name namwakina month are that natin children atei children nei, ne, N female title auti home ngkana, ñkana when boki book ni of bongina date o n aoraki hospital buki cause raure divorced bun, buna spouse ririki year, age bung birth tabo place buniaki born tai date e he, she taman father iai was, did te article (a, an, the) iein married tei child I-Kiribati native islander ten, te, T male title I-Matang foreigner tenua three karerei authorization teuana one karo parent tinan mother kawa town tuai not yet ke or ua, uoua two korobokian register Names • Strings of vowels (3 or more) are common.
  • Kiribati Water Governance

    Kiribati Water Governance

    Pacific Programme for Water Governance KIRIBATI WATER GOVERNANCE Milestone Report 2: Activities 3 and 4 Ian White Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies College of Science Australian National University June 2006 2 Acknowledgements This discussion paper was developed under the EU Pacific Water Governance Project, coordinated by SOPAC. It was written by Ian White, Australian National University in collaboration with: Eita Metai Acting Director, Public Works Department, Ministry of Public Works & Utilities Taboia Metutera Manager Water and Sewerage, Public Utilities Board, Ministry of Public Works & Utilities Pamela Messervy WHO Country Liaison Officer Kiribati Tianuare Taeuea Director, Environmental Health Unit, Ministry of Health & Medical Services Tererei Abete-Reema Director, Environment & Conservation Division, Ministry of Environment Lands and Agricultural Development Ross Allen Technical Adviser to the Strategic National Policy and Risk Assessment Unit, Office of the President Manikaoti Timeon Deputy Secretary, Ministry of Internal & Social Affairs Roko Timeon Coordinator, KANGO, The Kiribati Association of non-government organisations (NGO) in Kiribati Helen Jeans Past Technical Adviser, EU Commission Technical Office, Kiribati Tony Falkland Ecowise Environmental, Canberra, Australia 3 Republic of Kiribati showing all 33 islands in the Gilbert (western), Phoenix (central) and Line (eastern) Groups. The country spans over 3,500 km of the Central Pacific. 4 Table of Contents Acknowledgements............................................................................................................2