DOCSLIB.ORG

National Integrated Water Resource Management Diagnostic Report Kiribati

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Integrated Water Resource Management Diagnostic Report Kiribati Sustainable Integrated Water Resources and Wastewater Management in Pacific Island Countries National Integrated Water Resource Management Diagnostic Report Kiribati Published Date: November 2007 Draft SOPAC Miscellaneous Report 638 1 SIWRWMPIC-National IWRM Diagnostic Report Republic of Kiribati Acronyms AIDAB Australian International Development Assistance Bureau (now AusAID) ADB Asian Development Bank AGO Attorney General’s Office ACIAR Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research AMAK Kiribati Women’s Federation AusAID Australian Agency for International Development CCA Climate Change Adaptation CCST Climate Change Study Team CHARM Comprehensive Hazard and Risk Management CIRAD DCC Development Coordinating Committee EU European Union ECD Environment and Conservation Division (within MELAD) EHU Environmental Health Unit (within MHMS) ENSO El Niño- Southern Oscillation Index EVI Environmental Vulnerability Index GDP Gross Domestic Product GEF Global Environment Facility GOK Government of Kiribati HSA Hot Spot Analysis ICWM Integrated Coastal and Watershed Management IHP International Hydrological Programme (of UNESCO) IWRM Integrated Water Resource and Sanitation Management KANGO The Kiribati Association of NGOs KAP Kiribati Adaptation Program (Phases I, II & III) KL Kilolitre ( = 1 m3) KWASP Kiritimati Water Supply and Sanitation Project MABS Multi-Agent Based Simulation MCTTD Ministry of Communications, Transport and Tourism Development MELAD Ministry of Environment, Land, and Agricultural Development MEYSD Ministry of Education Youth and Sport Development MFED Ministry of Finance and Economic Development MFMRD Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources Development MHMS Ministry of Health and Medical Services 2 SIWRWMPIC-National IWRM Diagnostic Report Republic of Kiribati MISA Ministry of Internal and Social Affairs MLPID Ministry of Line and Phoenix Island Development MPWU Ministry of Public Works and Utilities MO Meteorology Office (within MCTTD) MPWU Ministry of Public Works and Utilities NAPA National Adaptation Plan of Action NCC National Council of Churches NASC National Adaptation Steering Committee NEP National Economic Planning (within MFEP) NGO Non-government organisation NZAID New Zealand International Aid and Development Agency NSPRAU National Strategic Policy and Risk Assessment Unit (within OB) NWSCC National Water and Sanitation Coordination Committee OB Office Te Beretitenti (the President) OFM Oceanic Fisheries Management OICWSP Outer Island Community Water Supply Project PfWG Pacific Water Governance PIC Pacific Island Country PUB Public Utilities Board (within MPWU) PVC Poly vinyl chloride PWD Public Works Division (within MLPID) RAP The Pacific Regional Action Plan for Sustainable Water Management RPU Rural Planning Unit (within MISA) SAP The Strategic Action Programme, International Waters of the Pacific Small Island Developing States SAPHE Sanitation, Public Health and Environment Improvement Project SIDS Small Island Developing States SIWRWMPIC Sustainable Integrated Water Resources and Wastewater Management in Pacific Island Countries SOI Southern Oscillation Index SOPAC Pacific Islands Applied Geoscience Commission SPC Secretariat of the Pacific Community UNCDF United Nations Capital Development Fund UNDP United Nations Development Program UNDTCD United Nations Department of Technical Cooperation for Development 3 SIWRWMPIC-National IWRM Diagnostic Report Republic of Kiribati UNDESA United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs UNEP United Nations Environment Program UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization UPR Uniform price rebate WEU Water Engineering Unit (within MPWU) WHO World Health Organization WUE Water Use Efficiency 4 Protecting groundwater sources Impact assessment Water conservation Climate change impacts Land use guidelines Sustainability Environment Economy Health Development Health education opportunities Microbial monitoring Job creation Sanitation and water Cost recovery quality guidelines Reinvestment Community Infrastructure Demand Reticulation systems Groundwater galleries Water conservation Rainwater harvesting Safe wells Health and hygiene Sewerage systems Appropriate sanitation Land use practices Solid waste disposal Resource monitoring Participation Interdependencies in the water and sanitation sector in Kiribati 5 SIWRWMPIC- National IWRM Diagnostic Report Kiribati TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms.........................................................................................................................................2 Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................10 Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................12 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................13 1.1 Sustainable integrated water resources and wastewater management in Pacific Island countries ....................................................................................................................................13 1.2 Linkage with the Pacific Regional Action Plan on Sustainable Water Resource Management..............................................................................................................................14 1.3 Aim of the SIWRWMPIC................................................................................................15 1.4 Scope of this Report ......................................................................................................15 2. General overview ..............................................................................................................17 2.1 Country Background Information ...................................................................................17 2.1.1 Location, distribution and topography ......................................................................17 2.1.2 Climate, soils, hydrogeology, vegetation and agriculture .........................................19 2.1.3 Demography and socio-economic aspects ..............................................................22 3. Integrated water resources management for Kiribati ........................................................26 3.1. Water resources management.......................................................................................26 3.1.1 Sources of freshwater ..............................................................................................26 3.1.1.1 Bottled water. ..............................................................................................................26 3.1.1.2 Shallow fresh groundwater..........................................................................................26 3.1.1.3 Rainwater harvesting. T ..............................................................................................26 3.1.2 Types of freshwater use ...........................................................................................27 3.1.3 Major issues and concerns.......................................................................................28 3.1.3.1 Provision of adequate water for human health and community development.......28 In 28 3.1.4 Provision of equitable access to safe water .............................................................30 3.1.5 Protection of water sources......................................................................................31 3.1.6 Provision of appropriate sanitation ...........................................................................31 3.1.7 Impact of droughts on water supplies.......................................................................32 3.1.8 Impact of sea level rise on water resources .............................................................32 3.1.9 Provision of sustainable water supply and sanitation systems.................................32 3.1.10 Ensuring groundwater supply systems do not compromise rights or livelihoods ...33 3.1.11 Improvement in water governance, capacity building and maintenance of skills ...33 3.1.12 Improvement in knowledge and monitoring............................................................34 3.3.13 Land and water ownership in water source areas and common perceptions ........34 3.1.4 Methods to manage impacts and concerns (IWRM) ................................................34 3.1.5 National Water and Sanitation Coordination Committee..........................................35 3.1.6. Water resources assessment and monitoring .........................................................36 3.1.7. Conservation and reuse ..........................................................................................36 3.1.8 Protection of water reserves.....................................................................................37 3.1.9 Managing the impact of drought...............................................................................38 3.2. Island vulnerability.........................................................................................................38 3.2.1 Types of disasters ....................................................................................................38 3.2.1.1 Disease outbreaks.......................................................................................................38 3.2.1.2 Severe droughts. .........................................................................................................38
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Preliminary Synopsis of Oral History Interviews at Rawaki Village And
    Preliminary Synopsis of Oral History Interviews at Rawaki Village and Nikumaroro Village Solomon Islands by The International Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery (TIGHAR) November 26, 2011 Nikumaroro Village Preliminary Synopsis of Oral History Interviews, Solomon Islands 2011 From August 20-30, 2011, John Clauss, Nancy Farrell, Karl Kern, Baoro Laxton Koraua and Gary F. Quigg, of The International Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery (TIGHAR) conducted a research expedition in the Solomon Islands consisting of oral history interviews with former residents of Nikumaroro Island (Kiribati) as well as a thorough examination of relevant archival materials in the Solomon Islands National Archives. This preliminary synopsis provides an initial overview of the research conducted by TIGHAR as a part of further testing the Earhart Project’s Nikumaroro Hypothesis. A more detailed report will follow, when the audio and video recordings have been completely transcribed and analyzed. Procedures Upon arrival in Honiara (Guadalcanal), Clauss, Farrell, Kern and Quigg were met by Koraua at the airport. Mr. Koraua is a resident of Honiara and the son of Paul Laxton. Mr. Laxton, who served as Assistant Lands Commissioner for the Gilbert and Ellice Islands Colony, was the British Colonial Service officer in charge of the settlement on Gardner Island (Nikumaroro Island) for several years following World War II. Born on Nikumaroro Island in 1960, Mr. Koraua was relocated to the Solomon Islands along with the entire population of the Nikumaroro Island colony in 1963. Mr. Koraua was crucial to the success of the expedition, acting as interpreter, logistics coordinator, ambassador and gracious host. Further, Mr. Koraua provided for our transportation between the outer islands of Kohinggo and Vaghena aboard his boat, the M/V Temauri.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Climate Outlook Forum (OCOF) No. 97 TABLE 1
    Pacific Islands - Online Climate Outlook Forum (OCOF) No. 97 Country Name: Kiribati TABLE 1: Monthly Rainfall Station (include data period) September 2015 July August Total 33%tile 67%tile Median Ranking 2015 2015 Rainfall Rainfall Rainfall (mm) Total Total (mm) (mm) Kanton 224 165.8 - 20.1 51.5 40.0 - Kiritimati 417.3 171.7 124.9 4.0 15.4 8.0 81 Tarawa 171.9 233.1 358.5 55.1 142.8 84.3 64 Butaritari 87.8 176.7 178.6 113.3 177.3 136 52 Beru 135.8 - - 28.1 68.0 43.3 - TABLE 2: Three-monthly Rainfall July to September 2015 [Please note that the data used in this verification should be sourced from table 3 of OCOF #93] Station Three-month 33%tile 67%tile Median Ranking Forecast probs.* Verification * Total Rainfall Rainfall Rainfall (include LEPS) (Consistent, (mm) (mm) (mm) Near- consistent Inconsistent? Kanton - 138.2 219.0 170.9 - 17/ 43 /40 (0.7) - Kiritimati 713.9 42.6 101.3 72.1 88/88 26/29/ 45 (-0.1) Consistent Tarawa 763.5 195.8 543.6 335.0 56/66 6/14/ 80 (19.7) Consistent Butaritari 443.1 506.3 743.0 634.0 16/73 5/35/ 60 (13.5) Inconsistent Beru - 130.7 292.5 173.5 - 3/13/ 84 (23.8) - Period:* below normal /normal /above normal Predictors and Period used for July to September 2015 Outlooks (refer to OCOF #93): Nino 3.4 SST Anomalies extended (2mths) * Forecast is consistent when observed and predicted (tercile with the highest probability) categories coincide (are in the same tercile).
    [Show full text]
  • Kiribati Fourth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity
    KIRIBATI FOURTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Aranuka Island (Gilbert Group) Picture by: Raitiata Cati Prepared by: Environment and Conservation Division - MELAD 20 th September 2010 1 Contents Acknowledgement ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Chapter 1: OVERVIEW OF BIODIVERSITY, STATUS, TRENDS AND THREATS .................................................... 8 1.1 Geography and geological setting of Kiribati ......................................................................................... 8 1.2 Climate ................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Status of Biodiversity ........................................................................................................................... 10 1.3.1 Soil ................................................................................................................................................. 12 1.3.2 Water Resources ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Participatory Diagnosis of Coastal Fisheries for North Tarawa And
    Photo credit: Front cover, Aurélie Delisle/ANCORS Aurélie cover, Front credit: Photo Participatory diagnosis of coastal fisheries for North Tarawa and Butaritari island communities in the Republic of Kiribati Participatory diagnosis of coastal fisheries for North Tarawa and Butaritari island communities in the Republic of Kiribati Authors Aurélie Delisle, Ben Namakin, Tarateiti Uriam, Brooke Campbell and Quentin Hanich Citation This publication should be cited as: Delisle A, Namakin B, Uriam T, Campbell B and Hanich Q. 2016. Participatory diagnosis of coastal fisheries for North Tarawa and Butaritari island communities in the Republic of Kiribati. Penang, Malaysia: WorldFish. Program Report: 2016-24. Acknowledgments We would like to thank the financial contribution of the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research through project FIS/2012/074. We would also like to thank the staff from the Secretariat of the Pacific Community and WorldFish for their support. A special thank you goes out to staff of the Kiribati’s Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources Development, Ministry of Internal Affairs, Ministry of Environment, Land and Agricultural Development and to members of the five pilot Community-Based Fisheries Management (CBFM) communities in Kiribati. 2 Contents Executive summary 4 Introduction 5 Methods 9 Diagnosis 12 Summary and entry points for CBFM 36 Notes 38 References 39 Appendices 42 3 Executive summary In support of the Kiribati National Fisheries Policy 2013–2025, the ACIAR project FIS/2012/074 Improving Community-Based
    [Show full text]
  • Kiritimati and Malden, Kiribati, Nuclear Weapons Test Sites
    Kiritimati and Malden, Kiribati, Nuclear weapons test sites A total of 33 nuclear detonations were conducted on two atolls of the Republic of Kiribati by the UK and the U.S. in the 1950s and 1960s. Thousands of islanders and servicemen were subjected to radioactive fallout and now su er from radiation e ects. History The Pacifi c atoll of Kiritimati (formerly the British colo- ny “Christmas Island”), served during WWII as a stop- over for the U.S. Air Force on its way to Japan. After the war, the United Kingdom used the atolls for its fi rst series of fi ssion bomb explosions. Due to agree- ments made with the Australian government, these servicemen and the indigenous population were free explosions could not be conducted at the British nu- to move around the island, consuming local water and clear testing site at Maralinga. On May 15, 1957, the fruits, bathing in contaminated lagoons and breathing fi rst British hydrogen bomb, code-named “Operation in radioactive dust.1 Grapple,” was exploded off the coast of Malden, fol- In 2006, 300 former Christmas Island residents sub- lowed by another a month later, neither of which yield- mitted a petition to the European Parliament, accus- ed the explosive power that was expected. The tests ing the UK of knowingly exposing them to radioactive reached a maximum yield of 720 kilotons, equivalent fallout despite knowing of the dangers. Declassifi ed to more than 50 times the power of the bomb that was government documents from the time warned that ra- dropped on Hiroshima.
    [Show full text]
  • Earhart's Final Resting Place Believed Found
    Earhart's Final Resting Place Believed Found Legendary aviatrix Amelia Earhart most likely died on an uninhabited tropical island in the southwestern Pacific republic of Kiribati, according to researchers at The International Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery (TIGHAR). Tall, slender, blonde and brave, Earhart disappeared while flying over the Pacific Ocean on July 2, 1937 in a record attempt to fly around the world at the equator. Her final resting place has long been a mystery. For years, Richard Gillespie, TIGHAR's executive director and author of the book "Finding Amelia," and his crew have been searching the Nikumaroro island for evidence of Earhart. A tiny coral atoll, Nikumaroro was some 300 miles southeast of Earhart's target destination, Howland Island. A number of artifacts recovered by TIGHAR would suggest that Earhart and her navigator, Fred Noonan, made a forced landing on the island's smooth, flat coral reef. According to Gillespie, who is set to embark on a new $500,000 Nikumaroro expedition next summer, the two became castaways and eventually died there. "We know that in 1940 British Colonial Service officer Gerald Gallagher recovered a partial skeleton of a castaway on Nikumaroro. Unfortunately, those bones have now been lost," Gillespie said. The archival record by Gallagher suggests that the bones were found in a remote area of the island, in a place that was unlikely to have been seen during an aerial search. A woman's shoe, an empty bottle and a sextant box whose serial numbers are consistent with a type known to have been carried by Noonan were all found near the site where the bones were discovered.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Vanstone Gavin Poritesgradient.Pdf
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY THE EFFECT OF A NUTRIENT GRADIENT ON THE PORITES-LITHOPHAGA SYSTEM IN THE PHOENIX ISLANDS GAVIN VANSTONE SPRING 2017 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in Biology with honors in Biology Reviewed and approved* by the following: Iliana Baums Associate Professor of Biology Thesis Supervisor Benoît Dayrat Associate Professor of Biology Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT Excess nutrients on coral reefs can lead to increased bioerosion by boring animals, such as mollusks and sponges. Bioerosion leads to weaker coral skeletons that are susceptible to fragmentation by both abiotic and biotic factors. The Phoenix Islands are an isolated archipelago found in the central Pacific Ocean in which the northern islands, Kanton and Enderbury, lie in the path of the Equatorial Undercurrent (EUC) creating periods of upwelling around the islands. This creates a nutrient gradient across the northern group and the southern group of islands. Two morphologically similar reef building corals, Porites evermanni and Porites lobata, were differentially susceptible to bioerosion by Lithophaga mussels, which can increase asexual reproduction rates by fragmentation. Nine of the ten islands studied here exhibited mainly sexual reproduction. Our results suggest a different trophic interaction in the Phoenix Islands than seen in the Eastern Tropical Pacific, where fragmentation by triggerfish
    [Show full text]
  • CBD Strategy and Action Plan
    Kiribati National Biodiversity Strategies and Actions Plan 2005 NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGIES AND ACTIONS PLAN (KIRITIMATI ISLAND 2005) PREPARED BY ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT, LANDS AND AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT October, 2006. 1En vironment & Conservation Division- MELAD Kiribati National Biodiversity Strategies and Actions Plan 2005 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Biodiversity in this context means all terrestrial and marine ecosystems, all plants and animal species and varieties found in these ecosystems including the knowledge, uses, beliefs and language that the people of Kiribati have in relation to their ecosystems and species. Biodiversity Conservation is always considered along with sustainable use. It has been confirmed that the present state of biodiversity in the Republic of Kiribati is being degraded socially, economically, politically and even judicially. As a nation with very limited resources we just cannot afford to sit back and let this serious degradation continues. If the biodiversity is not conserved or used on a sustainable basis, and if traditional sustainable management practices, and the knowledge and relevant language are not maintained or strengthened then future development would not be able to sustain the people in the long term. The main key in the whole process is the resource owners and users at the community level who hold the long- lasting key to biodiversity conservation. The development of Kiribati National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (K-NBSAP) has been highly consultative. The process of collecting data and information has been guided by the Steering Committee, a multi-disciplinary committee that comprises of representatives from different stakeholders. The diverse representation of the Steering Committee and the collaborative incentive of the grassroots people reflected a shift towards a multi-sectoral collaboration and the need to establish stronger social and institutional infrastructure to make local community co-management actually work in practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Cepf Final Project Completion Report
    CEPF FINAL PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT Organization Legal Name: Pacific Expeditions Limited (plus Eco Oceania sub-grant) Habitat Restoration of priority islands in the Phoenix Islands Project Title: Protected Area (PIPA) Date of Report: 19 Feb 2013 Dr Graham Wragg (and Dr Ray Pierce) Report Author and Contact PO Box 3063, Rarotonga, Cook Islands Information Email: [email protected] CEPF Region: Polynesia-Micronesia Strategic Direction: 1. Prevent, control, and eradicate invasive species in key biodiversity areas Grant Amount $ 292,000 Project Dates : November 1, 2009 to December 31, 2012 Implementation Partners for this Project (please explain the level of involvement for each partner): Pacific Expeditions Ltd (Dr Graham Wragg): Overall financial responsibility and grant holder. Shared logistical planning with Eco Oceania. Eco Oceania (Dr Ray Pierce): Lead agency for Science, Liaison with Kiribati, Planning of Eradications in July 2011 and sourcing finance for future invasive species work at the Phoenix Islands. Conservation Impacts Please explain/describe how your project has contributed to the implementation of the CEPF ecosystem profile. Please summarize the overall results/impact of your project. Project Approach (500 words) Background The Phoenix Islands are a World Heritage Site and also have many other international designations including Key Biodiversity Area and Important Bird Area reflecting the exceptionally high diversity and abundance of marine and terrestrial biota. The terrestrial values include globally important seabird colonies spanning 19 species of petrels, storm-petrels, frigatebirds, boobies, tropicbirds and terns, including the Endangered Phoenix petrel and white-throated storm-petrel which are largely confined to Rawaki. However, a fundamental problem facing these seabirds (and terrestrial biodiversity in general) has been the presence of 1-3 invasive vertebrate species on each of the 8 islands, with only Rawaki not having been invaded by rats (Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Use and Status of the Bokikokiko Or Christmas Island Warbler (Acrocephalus Aequinoctialis)1
    Habitat Use and Status of the Bokikokiko or Christmas Island Warbler (Acrocephalus aequinoctialis)1 Eric A. VanderWerf,2,5 Ray Pierce,3 Ratita Bebe,4 and Katareti Taabu4 Abstract: The Bokikokiko or Christmas Island Warbler (Acrocephalus aequinoc­ tialis) is found only on Kiritimati (Christmas) and Teraina ( Washington) Islands in the Republic of Kiribati. The population on Kiritimati Island is threatened by habitat degradation, sea level rise, and predation from feral cats (Felis catus), Pa- cific rats Rattus( exulans), and recently arrived black rats (Rattus rattus). There is scant information about distribution and abundance of the Bokikokiko. From 2007 to 2012, we conducted surveys with song playbacks at 83 points on 12 tran- sects in the northern half of Kiritimati Island to measure abundance of the Bokikokiko and begin monitoring for possible declines associated with the spread of rats, and we collected habitat data to investigate factors that influenced Bokikokiko abundance. Song playbacks resulted in a 263% increase in detection rate over passive listening. We detected an average (±1 SE) of 0.63 ± 0.11 birds per point using playbacks. Average population density was 0.36 ± 0.06 birds per hectare, but abundance varied among regions, and no birds were detected in some areas with apparently suitable habitat. Range of the Bokikokiko encom- passed an area of 14,180 ha but was fragmented by many lagoons and bare ground, and only about half that area was actually occupied. Estimated popula- tion size was 2,550 ± 425 birds. Bokikokiko were more abundant in areas with taller Heliotropium trees and taller Scaevola shrubs, and less abundant in areas with more Suriana shrubs, bare ground, and grass.
    [Show full text]
  • Kiribati Background Information
    Contents Executive Summary......................................................................................................................................... i List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................... iii 1.0. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Kiribati Background Information ............................................................................................................. 2 3.0 Biodiversity in Kiribati ............................................................................................................................. 3 4.0 Analysis of the Causes and Consequences of Biodiversity Loss ............................................................. 6 4.1 Causes of Biodiversity Loss ................................................................................................................. 6 4.2 Consequences of Biodiversity Loss ...................................................................................................... 8 5.0 National, Constitutional, Legal and Institutional Framework .................................................................. 8 5.1 Legislation ............................................................................................................................................ 8 5.2 Relevant Policies and Plans ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cepf Final Project Completion Report
    CEPF FINAL PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT Organization Legal Name: Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme Holding the Lines — Restoration of the Northern Line Project Title: Islands, Kiribati Date of Report: 28 February, 2013 Report Author and Contact Posa A. Skelton – [email protected] Information Dr Ray Pierce, Dr Souad Boudjelas, Dr Alan Tye, Seema Report contributors Deo, Ratita Bebe CEPF Region: Polynesia-Micronesia Strategic Direction: 1. Prevent, control, and eradicate invasive species in key biodiversity areas Grant Amount USD$ 165,000 Project Dates: October 1, 2009-December 31, 2012 Te Io – Brown Noddy (Anous stolidus) roosting on shrubs on Motu Tabu – a predator free island and a conservation area for seabirds Implementation Partners for this Project (please explain the level of involvement for each partner): Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme – provided the coordination for the project, including liaising between the Wildlife Conservation Unit (Govt. Kiribati) and technical experts (especially the Pacific Invasives Partnership). Also contributed technical advice and expertise in various activities of the project. Facilitated and assisted with development of awareness resources and also drafting of reports. Provided guidance and mentoring support to Wildlife Conservation Unit staff. Provided financial assistance and supported the participation and building of the capacity of the WCU staff in regional training courses and workshops. Ministry of Environment, Land and Agricultural Development – Wildlife Conservation Unit (Government of Kiribati) – provided support and co-financing in the implementation of activities of the project. Lead on the ground activities and actions and also provided the reality check of project activities and components. Provided dedicated staff to assist with the various project activities.
    [Show full text]