DOCSLIB.ORG

Capital Markets Project the UKRAINE STOCK

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Capital Markets Project the UKRAINE STOCK Capital Markets Project THE UKRAINE STOCK EXCHANGE ENVIRONMENT: CHALLENGES AND RECOMMENDATIONS Prepared by: Robert L. Smith International Adviser Capital Markets Development January 17, 2006 Robert L. Smith is a senior securities exchange professional with over 30 years diverse experience in regulation, operations, trading and management. He has an in-depth understanding of international best practices for exchange operations and oversight, having held positions with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, NASDAQ, Chicago Board Options Exchange, and with leading investment intermediaries. Mr. Smith has significant direct experience in emerging markets including work in Kazakstan, Thailand, China, Kyrgyzstan, and Georgia. 2 Preface This paper presents an analysis of securities exchanges in Ukraine, focusing in particular on whether the existing institutions have the capacity and independence to support a truly dynamic financial sector for Ukraine. While the focal point of the paper is the Ukrainian exchange environment, the role of the regulator, the Securities and Stock Market State Commission, is examined in the context of its impact on the development of stock exchange operations supporting true price transparency and planning for pension reform investments. In order to more fully speak to these challenges and better understand the role Ukraine’s securities exchanges can and should play in responding to them, the following analysis of the current status of Ukraine’s stock exchange operations was undertaken: • Background--History – review of the historical development of Ukraine’s securities exchanges, the current political and financial issues exchanges face, and the role of the GOU, the private sector, and international donor community. • Technical Capacity Analysis – evaluation of the capabilities of key exchanges active in Ukraine against requirements for a well-regulated and dynamic trading market, measured against international best practices for this market place. The analysis included, but was not limited to, a review of issues such as pricing, information disclosure, listing requirements, and the ability to service the full range of domestic and international customers. This analysis was benchmarked against several comparable markets. • International Best Practices – comparison of Ukraine’s exchange operations against international best practices, including a review of compliance with IOSCO Principles for operation of stock exchanges. The paper is intended to provide a baseline for future technical assistance to improve the operations of securities exchanges to meet market needs and contains short and medium term recommendations. The ultimate goal is to stimulate discussion and policy debate on issues of critical importance to Ukraine’s long-term securities market development, while also helping to establish consensus supporting needed changes in existing institutions, providing a firm foundation for a vibrant and truly dynamic capital markets sector in Ukraine. 3 Acknowledgements A special thanks to the following persons who generously took time to provide substantial input: Mikhail Nepran, Executive Director, Securities and Stock Market State Commission, Igor Olegovich Seletskiy, General Director, Troika Dialog Ukraine, a leading Russian investment bank subsidiary, Ihor Seliverstov, First Deputy Head of the Board of Directors, Ukrainian Interbank Currency Exchange, Irina Zarya, President and CEO, First Ukrainian Securities Trading System (PFTS), Bogdan O. Lupiy, Executive Director, First Ukrainian Securities Trading System, (PFTS), Serhiy M. Oksanych, President, Kinto, an investment company, Anatoly V. Fedorenko, Vice President, Kinto, an investment company, Volodimir Scherban, Head of Supervisory Board, PARD, the Professional Association of Registrars and Depositories, and a licensed SRO, Andrei Kazakov, President, Kyiv International Stock Exchange, Hanna Yatsyuk, Chairman of the Council of Directors, Ukrainian Stock Exchange Denis Butenko, Operations Director Ukrainian Stock Exchange, and Dmitro Tarabakin, Director, Dragon Capital, an investment bank. Valuable support was provided by Victor Sizonenko, translator, interpreter and curator of documents extraordinaire. 4 Abbreviations COM Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine ETS Electronic Trading System GDP Gross Domestic Product GOU Government of Ukraine (i.e., the COM and the various ministries and agencies, but not the Presidential Administration, the Verkhovna Rada or the courts) IFRS International Accounting Standards of the International Accounting Standards Committee IOSCO International Organization of Securities Commissions JSC Joint Stock Company MFS Interregional Stock Union (operational clearing depository for securities) MOF Ministry of Finance of Ukraine NBU National Bank of Ukraine Rada Verkhovna Rada(Parliament) PFTS Persha Fondova Torhova Systema, (First Ukranian Securities Trading System). SOP State owned property SOS State owned shares SPF State Property Fund of Ukraine SRO Self-Regulatory Organizations SSMSC Securities and Stock Market State Commission UAH Hryvnia (Ukrainian Currency) USAID United States Agency for International Development WFE World Federation of Exchanges 5 Table of Contents Page Executive Summary and Recommendations ………………………………………. Section 1. Importance of an Organized Securities Market………………………. Section 2. Background of the Ukrainian Stock Exchange System……………… Section 3. Ukraine’s Economic Outlook and Recent Developments……………… Section 4. Overview of the Status of Ukraine’s Stock Exchange System………… Section 5. Comparison of PFTS and Ukrainian Stock Exchange 5.1 Review of PFTS Operations…………………………………………………. 5.2 Review of Ukrainian Stock Exchange Operations…………………………. Section 6. Role of the Regulator in Development of Stock Exchange System…… Conclusions 6 Executive Summary In the past two years the Ukrainian equity market has grown from one of the smallest in the region, representing 10% of GDP for 2003 to an estimated 35% of GDP for 2005. This dramatic growth in Ukraine’s market capitalization when compared to Hungary, Poland and Czech Republic is Market Capitalization as Persentage of GDP explained by the positive effect % of the Orange Revolution. 40 Although there are 235 listed 35 companies, the market is highly 30 concentrated, with the market 25 capitalization of the 10 largest 2003 20 2004 companies representing about 2005 70 percent of the market. 15 Despite this growth, the equity 10 market is highly fragmented, 5 lacks price transparency, and is 0 illiquid. Free float by public Ukraine Hungary Czech Poland companies is estimated at Sources:SSMSC, PFTS, European Federation of Stock Exchanges, and World Bank about 4 percent of market capitalization. It is estimated that some 95 to 98 percent of securities transactions occur outside the organized market. The low liquidity in the Equity Turnover ($ Mil) And Number of Listed Companies Ukrainian market, evidenced in Chart 2, as compared to the 45000 40 40000 CES countries is attributed to 35000 corruption, inappropriate 30000 political intervention, and 24 25000 2003 concentration of ownership of 43 55 21 2004 20000 2005 privatized companies in the 46 15000 hands of Ukraine’s six major 51 38 18 10000 financial groups. This results in 5000 262 167 191 few actively traded companies 0 Ukraine Hungary Czech Poland due to the low number of its Sources: SSMSC, PFTS, European Federation of Stock Exchanges, and World Bank shares available for trading. Recent political intervention is evidenced by the Presidential Decree dated November 24, 2005. This Decree directed that pension funds invest only in shares listed on a “securities exchange.” Likewise the Decree mandated that State owned shares be sold and traded over stock exchanges, and that state owned enterprises must be listed on stock exchanges. Yet the existing stock exchanges lack the institutional capacity to provide a fair and transparent market for this State dictate. These directives, if implemented, will favor the financial security of weak ”pocket” exchanges at the expense of a vibrant capital market and pension reform. Support of dormant stock exchanges can only lead to price manipulation and further corruption. The current fragmentation of the market flows from decisions made to facilitate mass privatization in the mid 1990s, in which the regulator, acting more as an administrator of the market than a regulator, licensed regional stock exchanges to handle privatizations of local enterprises. Today, Ukraine has 10 trade organizations licensed by the SSMSC, 8 of 7 which are licensed as a stock exchange, and 2 licensed as trade information systems 1 (electronic trading systems), which is well in excess of the markets needs. The two most active trade organizations are PFTS, an electronic trading system, which accounts for more than 86% of all trading volume, and the Ukrainian Stock Exchange, established in 1991, which accounts for approximately 12.6% of trade volume. The remaining 8 trade organizations, 7 exchanges and one electronic trading system, are practically dormant, but with random trading, further exacerbating the fragmented market, and adversely affecting price and liquidity. These dormant trade organizations remain open solely in the hope of participating in privatization and sale of state owned shares (SOS), capturing the facilitation Source: PFTS commission of 1 percent of the sale proceeds of SOS. It has also been widely noted that when an occasional trade is transacted though these organizations it
Load more

Recommended publications
  • REQUIEM for DONBAS Three Essays on the Costs of War in Ukraine
    JOHANNES KEPLER UNIVERSITY LINZ Altenberger Str. 69 4040 Linz, Austria www.jku.at, DVR 0093696 REQUIEM FOR DONBAS Three Essays on the Costs of War in Ukraine By Artem Kochnev A Doctoral Thesis submitted at Department of Economics to obtain the academic degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Doctoral Program “PhD Program in Economics” Supervisor and First Examiner Second Examiner em. Univ-Prof. Dr. Michael Landesmann Dr. habil. rer. soc. oec. Robert Stehrer May 2020 Abstract The thesis investigates short- and long-term effects of war on the economy of Ukraine. Specifically, it discusses the impact of separatists’ control and subsequent adverse trade policies on the real economy, responses of stock market investors to battle events, and the effect of conflict intensity on reform progress and institutional change in Ukraine. The thesis finds that the impact of war on the economy is most pronounced on the real economy of the war-torn regions. Whereas separatists’ control caused a decline in economic activity by at least 38%, the thesis does not find evidence supporting that the impact of conflict intensity on asset prices and institutional change in Ukraine was linear in parameters. The thesis explains the lack of the linear relationship between asset price move- ments and conflict intensity by investors’ inattention caused by information overload during the early stages of the conflict. Regarding the possible relationship between con- flict and institutional change, the thesis argues that it was electoral competition, not the conflict dynamics, that had an impact on the decision-making process of the policymak- ers in Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Conducting Business in Ukraine Brochure
    Conducting Business 2017 in Ukraine All of the information included in this document is for informational purposes only, and may not reflect the most current legal developments, judgments, or settlements. This information is not offered as legal or any other advice on any particular matter. The Firm and the contributing authors expressly disclaim all liability to any person in respect of anything, and in respect of the consequences of anything, done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of Baker McKenzie’s Conducting Business in Ukraine brochure. No client or other reader should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any matter contained in this document without first seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances. Conducting Business in Ukraine 2017 Baker McKenzie Renaissance Business Center 24 Bulvarno-Kudriavska St. Kyiv 01601, Ukraine Tel.: +380 44 590 0101 Fax: +380 44 590 0110 [email protected] www.bakermckenzie.com\ukraine Conducting Business in Ukraine Table of Contents Preface ................................................................................................... i 1. Ukraine – An Overview .......................................................... 1 1.1 Geography, Topography and Population .................... 1 1.2 Government, Political and Legal Systems .................. 1 1.3 Regional Structure ...................................................... 6 1.4 Economy ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Modern Tendencies in the Ukrainian
    Baltic Journal of Economic Studies Vol. 1, No. 2, 2015 EVALUATION OF THE MODERN TENDENCIES IN THE UKRAINIAN STOCK MARKET DEVELOPMENT Oleksandr TROFIMCHUK1, Mykhailo TROFIMCHUK2, International Economics and Humanities University named after S. Demyanchuk, Ukraine Abstract. The purpose of the article is to research and critically evaluate the features of functioning and develop- ment the stock market in Ukraine. The main point is to substantiate modern tendencies and to find ways of more efficient development of the Ukrainian stock market. Methodology. The research is based on the analysis of the important aspects which characterize stock market development. They are the volume of trading activity that was done on stock exchanges, level of market capitalization, economic concentration, price policy on market services, and control over the insider information use and manipulation identification. Results. On the basis of volume of trading activity that was done on stock exchanges, features of stock market structure are determined. Comparative analysis between the stock market capitalization level of Ukraine and average world index of stock market capi- talization is done. The level and dynamic of economic concentration is defined. Features of competition between Ukrainian stock exchanges are analyzed. Great attention in research is paid to problems of control over the insider information use and principles of manipulation identification by stock exchanges. Value/originality. The research showed that main amount of trading operations was done in “shadow” stock market, capitalization level decreased and stock market in Ukraine does not meet international standards of transparency. Further research should be focused on problems of ensuring the effective implementation of the basic principles of competition between market participants.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforms in Ukraine After Revolution of Dignity
    REFORMS IN UKRAINE AFTER REVOLUTION OF DIGNITY What was done, why not more and what to do next This publicaon was produced with financial Responsibility for the informaon and views set out assistance from the EBRD-Ukraine Stabilisaon and in this publicaon lies enrely with the authors. The Sustainable Growth Mul-Donor Account, the EBRD makes no representaon or warranty, express donors of which are Denmark, Finland, France, or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, informaon set forth in the publicaon. The EBRD Poland, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, has not independently verified any of the informaon the United States of America and the European contained in the publicaon and the EBRD accepts Union, the largest donor. The views expressed herein no liability whatsoever for any of the informaon can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion contained in the publicaon or for any misstatement of the EBRD or any donor of the account. or omission therein. The publicaon remains the property of the EBRD. REFORMS IN UKRAINE AFTER REVOLUTION OF DIGNITY What was done, why not more and what to do next Editors Ivan Miklos Pavlo Kukhta Contents Foreword 4 Introducon What was done, why not more and what to do next: Ukrainian reforms aer the Revoluon of Dignity 7 Chapter 1 Polical economy of reforms: polical system, governance and corrupon 10 Chapter 2 Macroeconomic policies 35 Chapter 3 Rule of law 48 Chapter 4 Energy policy 75 Chapter 5 Business environment 87 Chapter 6 Land reform 101 Chapter 7 Privasaon and SOE reform 112 Chapter 8 Healthcare reform 132 Chapter 9 Ukraine and the European Union 144 Annex 1 Report on reforms in 2016-17 162 Annex 2 The role of the government and MPs in reform implementaon in Ukraine 167 About SAGSUR (Strategic Advisory Group for Support of Ukrainian Reforms) 173 Glossary of terms 174 Foreword Foreword | 4 Foreword Maeo Patrone and Peter M.
    [Show full text]
  • Cleaning up the Energy Sector
    10 Cleaning Up the Energy Sector Victory is when we won’t buy any Russian gas. —Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk1 Ukraine’s energy sector is well endowed but extremely mismanaged. Since Ukraine’s independence, it has been the main source of top-level corruption, and its prime beneficiaries have bought the state. This long-lasting policy has undermined national security, caused unsustainable public costs, jeopardized the country’s balance of payments, led to massive waste of energy, and capped domestic production of energy. It is difficult to imagine a worse policy. In- stead, conditions should be created so that Ukraine can develop its substantial energy potential and become self-sufficient in coal and natural gas.2 The solution to these problems is no mystery and it has been elaborated in a large literature for the last two decades. To check corruption energy prices need to be unified. That means raising key prices four to five times, which will eliminate the large energy subsidies and stimulate energy saving, while also stimulating domestic production of all kinds of energy. To make this politi- cally possible, social compensation should be offered to the poorest half of the population. The energy sector suffers from many shortcomings, and most of these need to be dealt with swiftly. Otherwise, new rent-seeking interests will evolve, and soon they will become entrenched and once again impossible to defeat. The new government has a brief window of opportunity to address the most important issues. 1. “Ukraina osvoboditsya ot ‘gazovoi zavisimosti’ ot RF cherez 5 let—Yatsenyuk” [“Yatsenyuk: Ukraine Will Free Itself from Gas Dependence on Russia in 5 Years”], Ekonomichna pravda, Sep- tember 8, 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Political Course Shift in Ukraine on Stock Returns
    IMPACT OF POLITICAL COURSE SHIFT IN UKRAINE ON STOCK RETURNS by Oleksii Marchenko A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MA in Economic Analysis Kyiv School of Economics 2014 Thesis Supervisor: Professor Tom Coupé Approved by ___________________________________________________ Head of the KSE Defense Committee, Professor Irwin Collier __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ Date ___________________________________ Kyiv School of Economics Abstract IMPACT OF POLITICAL COURSE SHIFT IN UKRAINE ON STOCK RETURNS by Oleksii Marchenko Thesis Supervisor: Professor Tom Coupé Since achieving its independence from the Soviet Union, Ukraine has faced the problem which regional block to integrate in. In this paper an event study is used to investigate investors` expectations about winners and losers from two possible integration options: the Free Trade Agreement as a part of the Association Agreement with the European Union and the Custom Union of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan. The impact of these two sudden shifts in the political course on stock returns is analyzed to determine the companies which benefit from each integration decisions. No statistically significant impact on stock returns could be detected. However, our findings suggest a large positive reaction of companies` stock prices to the dismissal of Yanukovych regime regardless of company`s trade orientation and political affiliation.
    [Show full text]
  • Markit Index Standard Treatment Index Manual / 7 May 2021
    Markit Index Standard Treatment Index Manual / 7 May 2021 Copyright © 2021 IHS Markit Ltd T180614 Markit Index Standard Treatment | CA003 1 Introduction..................................................................................................4 2 Terminology and Notation........................................................................... 5 3 Divisor Methodology....................................................................................8 4 Dividend Points Calculation........................................................................ 9 5 Indices Conversion to Different Currencies.............................................. 10 6 Corporate Actions Treatment Specifications............................................. 11 6.1 General rules of corporate actions treatment....................................11 6.1.1 Price Return, Net Return and Gross Return index adjustments................................................................................... 11 6.1.2 Corporate actions implementation date.................................... 11 6.2 Cash Dividends ................................................................................ 11 6.2.1 Regular Cash Dividend.............................................................11 6.2.1.1 Definition .......................................................................... 11 6.2.1.2 Treatment ......................................................................... 12 6.2.2 Special Cash Dividend..............................................................13 6.2.2.1
    [Show full text]
  • Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine 15 April 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY …………………………………………………. 3 I. INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………. 6 A. Context B. Universal and regional human rights instruments ratified by Ukraine C. UN human rights response D. Methodology III. UNDERLYING HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS ……………………… … 10 A. Corruption and violations of economic and social rights B. Lack of accountability for human rights violations and weak rule of law institutions IV. HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS RELATED TO THE MAIDAN PROTESTS ……………………………………………………… 13 A. Violations of the right to freedom of assembly B. Excessive use of force, killings, disappearances, torture and ill-treatment C. Accountability and national investigations V. CURRENT OVERALL HUMAN RIGHTS CHALLENGES ……………… 15 A. Protection of minority rights B. Freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and the right to information C. Incitement to hatred, discrimination or violence D. Lustration, judicial and security sector reforms VI. SPECIFIC HUMAN RIGHTS CHALLENGES IN CRIMEA …………….. 20 VII. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ………………………….. 22 A. Conclusions B. Recommendations for immediate action C. Long-term recommendations Annex I: Concept Note for the deployment of the UN human rights monitoring mission in Ukraine 2 | P a g e I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. During March 2014 ASG Ivan Šimonović visited Ukraine twice, and travelled to Bakhchisaray, Kyiv, Kharkiv, Lviv, Sevastopol and Simferopol, where he met with national and local authorities, Ombudspersons, civil society and other representatives, and victims of alleged human rights abuses. This report is based on his findings, also drawing on the work of the newly established United Nations Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine (HRMMU).
    [Show full text]
  • Raiffeisen Centrobank AG Notice to the Holders of the Structured
    The securities issues of Raiffeisen Centrobank AG are subject to these General Securities Terms. The Final Terms (see Chapter VI of the Base Prospectus of 21 July 2006) will contain any supplementary information specific to the individual securities. Raiffeisen Centrobank AG retains the right to change these Securities Terms. SECURITIES TERMS (to FT No. 151 of 23rd April 2007) of Raiffeisen Centrobank AG for Open End Investment Certificates (see Final Terms, line 1) § 1 Investor Rights 1. Raiffeisen Centrobank AG, Tegetthoffstraße 1, 1010 Vienna ("Issuer") issues as of 6th June 2007 (see FT, line 34) a total volume of up to [see column “Volume” in the excerpt of the offering, see FT, line 43) pieces Open End Investment Certificates (see FT, line 1) pursuant to these Securities Terms, ISIN [see column “ISIN Product” on the excerpt of the offering; FT, line 2] (see FT, line 2) on the Eastbasket Ukraine Kazakhstan [see column “Underlying Instrument (UL)” in the excerpt of the offering; FT, line 11-13). 2. The structured security entitles the holder the right to claim redemption pursuant to § 9. 3. The structured securities are listed on an exchange and can be traded continuously in denominations of one (see FT, line 45) or a multiple thereof on every exchange trading day on the exchange and over the counter. Securities not listed on an exchange can be traded continuously over the counter. 4. The issuance of structured securities is done in the form of a continuous issue. 5. The issue price of the securities is fixed taking into account several different factors (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Weeklyoverview
    UKRAINIAN EQUITY MARKET:: WEEKLY OVERVIEW Parex Asset Management 5–6 JANUARY 2010 Republikas laukums 2a, Riga, Latvia, LV-1522 Lidiya Mudra, Financial Analyst Tel. 371 67010810 Fax. 371 67778622 http://www.parexgroup.com Email: [email protected] Equity Market The Ukrainian major exchanges started the year on a PFTS Index positive note, with PFTS index gaining 3.82% and UX 700 adding 5.09% during holiday-shortened trading week. PFTS In the metallurgical sector, the Financial Times has last week: informed that an unnamed Russian group is close to 650 buying control of the Ukrainian metallurgical +3.82% corporation Industrial Union of Donbas (IUD). According to FT, the “50%+2 shares” stake in the IUD 600 might be sold by the end of January for up to $2b. 06-Jan-10: Later in the week, Oleksandr Pilipenko, a vice 594.80 550 president within the IUD group, revealed in a Oct Nov Dec Jan statement that one of its new owners is Swiss-based steel trader Carbofer, itself co-owned by Russian below.) businessman Alexander Katunin. At the same time, In the agricultural sector, Ukraine's leading sugar PFTS index gained he did not name the others Mr. Katunin’s partners, producer Astarta Holding released 2009 operational 3.82% and UX revealing only that “none of the new owners would results. In 2009, Astarta produced more than 225ths added 5.09% during have more than a 20% stake”. There were given no tonnes of sugar (-4.5% y/y) that allowed the company the week figures for the value of the deal in the statement.
    [Show full text]
  • International Projects
    Monthly Issue 7/2012 July 2012 YOUR GUIDE TO THE RUSSIAN STOCK AND DERIVATIVES MARKET International Projects In this Issue: MICEX–RTS announced the launch of trading in futures Valuable information for your business including: on BRICS Indices • The latest news from the With the launch of futures on (Johannesburg Stock Exchange) Russian market BRICS benchmark equity indices from South Africa. on June 6, 2012, all Russian The first stage of the BRICS • Market data for June 2012 investors, for the first time, got exchanges’ cooperation is cross- • MICEX–RTS International an opportunity for easy exposure listing of benchmark equity index projects to these fast-growing markets. derivatives on all the participating • Professional opinion of market This became possible thanks trading venues. As a result, all specialists to the joint efforts of the BRICS MICEX–RTS clients have been exchanges alliance that was provided access to the following formed on 12 October 2011. financial instruments: This is a unique project that opens The initiative brings together • futures contract up new opportunities for economic the BM&FBOVESPA from Brazil, on the BOVESPA Index; cooperation in the BRICS region. MICEX–RTS Exchange from • futures contract The initiative provides more investors Russia, the BSE Ltd (formerly on the Sensex Index; with an easy access to the dynamic known as Bombay Stock • futures contract BRICS economies which will facilitate Exchange) from India, Hong Kong on the Hang Seng Index; liquidity growth in these markets Exchanges and Clearing Limited • futures contract on the and considerably strengthen the (HKEx), and the JSE Limited FTSE/JSE Top40 Index international position of the BRICS alliance in the global economy.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Market Highlights
    2020 Market Highlights Summary 2020 was an extraordinary year for everyone, perhaps rather too eventful. The Covid-19 pandemic, the US presidential election, Brexit, the resignation of Japan’s prime minister Shinzo Abe and increased tension between the US and China created vast economic uncertainty and a flood of pessimistic forecasts. In March we saw market volatility levels comparable only to those of the Great Financial Crisis of 2008 and for months on end, normal working, travel, and leisure arrangements were severely disrupted. When we look at the data, the magnitude of the shock is evident, particularly in March. But what is remarkable is that despite the exceptional circumstances and even during the worst days of the crisis, markets remained open and functioning. In addition, after the peak in uncertainty observed in March, markets quickly recovered. By the end of July, most indicators registered a quick reversal to the activity levels seen before the pandemic, reflecting a strong confidence in the markets and in their role in supporting the economy. Towards the end of the year, the news of the development and approval of several Covid-19 vaccines, the final agreement between the UK and the EU, and the outcome of the US elections seemed to have boosted the confidence of investors and issuers, driving markets to end the year on a high note. Key Indicators Equities • After a sharp drop (20.7%) in Q1, domestic market capitalisation quickly recovered, reaching pre-pandemic levels by the end of Q2. • In November 2020, global market capitalisation passed the 100 USD trillion mark for the first time, ending the year at 109.21 USD trillion, up 19.7% when compared with the end of 2019.
    [Show full text]