Fact Sheet of Montana

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fact Sheet of Montana C-LIEGE - Clean Last mile transport and logistics management for smart and efficient local Governments in Europe OUTPUT n. 3.2 PILOT FACT SHEET: Montana City / Bulgaria Dissemination level: PUBLIC Work package n. 3 Version: Final Date of preparation: 31/05/2012 The sole responsibility for the content of this deliverable lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union. Neither the EACI nor the European Commission are responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. Grant Agreement n. IEE/10/154/SI2.589407 – C-LIEGE TABLE OF CONTENT 1. General description of the city .............................................................................................. 3 1.1. Description of the city .................................................................................................... 3 1.2. Freight transport Infrastructure ...................................................................................... 4 1.3. Regulations applicable to Urban Freight Transport in Montana ..................................... 4 1.4. Major freight traffic problems ......................................................................................... 4 2. Stakeholders: facts about their role in urban transport .......................................................... 5 2.1. List of Stakeholders ....................................................................................................... 5 2.2. The role of the single stakeholders for city logistics .......................................................... 6 3. Existing practices ................................................................................................................. 6 4. Existing ideas about solutions and projects .......................................................................... 6 4.1. Introduction of differentiated fees for loading / uploading ............................................... 6 4.2. Building a terminal for the redistribution of goods .......................................................... 7 4.3. Driver training for sustainable freight traffic (eco-driving) ............................................... 7 4.4. Other Ideas ................................................................................................................... 7 5. Existing conflicts ................................................................................................................... 7 6. Previous relevant ideas not put into practice ........................................................................ 7 7. Previous relevant ideas put into practice, whether they were successful or not .................... 7 Output O3.2 Page 2 a 7 31/05/2012 1. General description of the city 1.1. Description of the city European Corridor № 4 (E79) crosses along Montana Municipality and passes through Montana city. In the near future is expected to start the construction of a ring road around Montana City. Montana city is located 50 km away from the European Corridor № 7 (Danube river), respectively 50 km away from the port of Lom. The distance between Montana and the second Danube Bridge at Vidin-Calafat, which will provide road access and rail links with the EU is 100 km. The bridge construction will be completed in September 2012. The distance to the nearest international airport is 120 km. Montana City is located along the railway line Boychinovtsi – Berkovitsa which is part of the national railway network. The total length of the railway line which passes along the municipality is 18 km. The railway station in Montana has available all the necessary technical facilities for bulk deliveries. The total length of the street network of Montana is 121, 4 km. The real centre of the town is a pedestrian zone and is closed to all vehicles. It consists of a square and parks located to the east and west direction. The main vehicles traffic is directed to the south of downtown. In the centre of the city is introduced an hourly parking fee for users of administrative, banking, legal and others services. The parking area consists of a square and four streets with about 200 parking spaces. There are two Industrial zones in the city. The main Industrial zone is located in the northeast part of the city and occupies about one third of the city area. The second industrial area is considerably smaller and is located to the east of the city. The traffic in the zone is not heavy. Output O3.2 Page 3 a 7 31/05/2012 1.2. Freight transport Infrastructure The transport infrastructure of Montana City is designed and constructed more than 50 years ago. There are two newly constructed bridges on the ring road, which at that area coincides with the E79 road. The ring road is not entirely constructed, so the transit traffic passes through part of the city. Load capacity of roadways is low and often light falls appear. During the last 20 years the roads and streets where heavy trucks go along were only rehabilitated. The main street, serving the industrial zone is not enough wide. The freight railway station is only partly used. The main reason is that with few exceptions, the plants in the town are micro and small and it is not effective to use railway transport. 1.3. Regulations applicable to Urban Freight Transport in Montana In Bulgaria is applied the Law for Road Traffic and its Implementing Rules. Montana Municipality has also a Regulation for the movement organization. There are road signs which prohibit the traffic of trucks with over 4 tons weight in the central part. Smaller trucks can access the centre at the conditions of a licensing regime, regulated by the local authorities 1.4. Major freight traffic problems The Industrial area of the city is served mainly by two streets and a boulevard. Most significant is the workload of the street “Industrial” which is the busiest street as the most plants’ entrances are located on it. The street is not sufficiently wide which makes the traffic and the access to the plants difficult. The lack of parking space additionally burdens the street with on-street loading/unloading. Because of that and the existing curves, the visibility is not good which hinders the traffic. The route of the transit trucks goes along the streets bordering the city centre which in addition makes the traffic busier during the weekdays. Output O3.2 Page 4 a 7 31/05/2012 2. Stakeholders: facts about their role in urban transport 2.1. List of Stakeholders Name Organisation Stakeholder Group Mr Zlatko Zhivkov Mayor of the Municipality of Montana Authorities Ms Violeta Bozhinova Municipality of Vratsa Authorities (Project SUGAR) Ms Denitsa Slavkova Regional Inspectorate of Environment Authorities and Water Mr Ivaylo Spasov Road Infrastructure Agency (RIA), Authorities Office Montana Mr Ivaylo Petrov Montana District Governor Authorities Mr Lyubomir Brankov Executive Agency Automobile Authorities Administration, Office Montana Mr Nikolay Ivanov National Railway Infrastructure Authorities Company (NRIC), Office Montana Ms Maria Georgieva Municipality of Sofia Authorities (Project PIMMS TRANSFER TRansferring Actions iN Sustainable mobility For European Regions) Ms Lucia Ilieva Club “Sustainable Development of Civil NGOs Society” (Project EPOMM - Partners Learning Urban Sustainability) Ms Polixena Krastanova Bulgarian Association for Freight Professional Associations Forwarding, Transport and Logistics Ms Maria Bulgarian Logistics Association Professional Associations Vodenicharova Mr Krasimir Perchinkov Kroma trans Freight Carriers Mr Valentin Alexandrov Elektra oil Freight Carriers Ms Kostadinka Petrova Montana AT Freight Carriers Ms Marieta Kostova Berg Montana Fittings Local shippers (Manufacturers) Mr Stefan Ivanov Cross Local shippers (Manufacturers) Output O3.2 Page 5 a 7 31/05/2012 2.2. The role of the single stakeholders for city logistics The national, regional and local administrations must be the linker among the stakeholders and to get them together in order to inform them about their intentions regarding the C-LIEGE project. It will be very helpful for the admistrations if stakeholders share their ideas. Depending on administrations` possibilities and capacity they will support the implementation of the best practices and ideas for the region. 3. Existing practices Since more than fifteen years the Municipal administration of Montana issues paid permissions for freight vehicles that load and up load goods and deliver them to retailers. 4. Existing ideas about solutions and projects Possibilities from 1 st Round Table Checklist: - Introduction of differentiated fees for loading / uploading - Building a terminal for the redistribution of goods - Training the drivers of eco-driving 4.1. Introduction of differentiated fees for loading / uploading Regarding the financial measure “Vehicle financing schemes – Attractive, publicly subsidized financing (e.g. leasing) models” could stimulate freight operators to use more environmentally friendly freight vehicles. The proposal concerning this issue is that the government could establish different tax levels depending on the ecological fact of the vehicle transport. Output O3.2 Page 6 a 7 31/05/2012 4.2. Building a terminal for the redistribution of goods As a result of construction of such a terminal in the Industrial zone (located in the city suburbs) the number of the freight vehicles will decrease and the traffic and pollution will be deduced. The purpose is to upload the goods of the freight trucks at the terminal, where
Recommended publications
  • Responses of the Bulgarian Government to the Report of The
    CPT/Inf (2008) 12 Responses of the Bulgarian Government to the report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on its visit to Bulgaria from 10 to 21 September 2006 The Bulgarian Government has requested the publication of these responses. The CPT’s report on its September 2006 visit to Bulgaria is set out in document CPT/Inf (2008) 11. Strasbourg, 28 February 2008 - 3 - CONTENTS Page Response of the Ministry of Justice to paragraph 48 of the CPT’s report ............. 5 Response of the Bulgarian Government to the CPT’s report ................................. 11 Response of the Ministry of Justice to the letter of 20 November 2007 by the President of the CPT .................................................................................... 61 - 5 - Response of the Ministry of Justice to paragraph 48 of the CPT’s report - 7 - - 8 - - 9 - - 10 - Response of the Bulgarian Government to the CPT’s report - 11 - CONTENTS Establishments under the Authority of the Ministry of Interior……………………….. 13 Establishments under the Authority of the Ministry of Justice………………………… 22 Investigation Detention Facilities (IDFs) ………………………………………… 22 Prison Establishments……………………………………………………………… 28 Establishments under the Authority of the Ministry of Health………………………... 47 District Dispensary for Psychic Diseases - Hospital – Rouse……………………. 47 State Psychiatric Hospital (SPH) – Byala………………………………………… 47 State Psychiatric Hospital (SPH) – Karloukovo………………………………...... 50 Establishments under the Authority of the Ministry of Labour and Social Policy…… 53 - 12 - Establishments under the Authority of the Ministry of Interior The Republic of Bulgaria has ratified a number of international documents, regarding human rights, ensuring the legal frames where the police perform their obligations, being called to protect the freedom and security of the community, which they serve to.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR
    Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi,
    [Show full text]
  • 1 I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and List of Rural Municipalities in Bulgaria
    I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and list of rural municipalities in Bulgaria (according to statistical definition). 1 List of rural municipalities in Bulgaria District District District District District District /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality Blagoevgrad Vidin Lovech Plovdiv Smolyan Targovishte Bansko Belogradchik Apriltsi Brezovo Banite Antonovo Belitsa Boynitsa Letnitsa Kaloyanovo Borino Omurtag Gotse Delchev Bregovo Lukovit Karlovo Devin Opaka Garmen Gramada Teteven Krichim Dospat Popovo Kresna Dimovo Troyan Kuklen Zlatograd Haskovo Petrich Kula Ugarchin Laki Madan Ivaylovgrad Razlog Makresh Yablanitsa Maritsa Nedelino Lyubimets Sandanski Novo Selo Montana Perushtitsa Rudozem Madzharovo Satovcha Ruzhintsi Berkovitsa Parvomay Chepelare Mineralni bani Simitli Chuprene Boychinovtsi Rakovski Sofia - district Svilengrad Strumyani Vratsa Brusartsi Rodopi Anton Simeonovgrad Hadzhidimovo Borovan Varshets Sadovo Bozhurishte Stambolovo Yakoruda Byala Slatina Valchedram Sopot Botevgrad Topolovgrad Burgas Knezha Georgi Damyanovo Stamboliyski Godech Harmanli Aitos Kozloduy Lom Saedinenie Gorna Malina Shumen Kameno Krivodol Medkovets Hisarya Dolna banya Veliki Preslav Karnobat Mezdra Chiprovtsi Razgrad Dragoman Venets Malko Tarnovo Mizia Yakimovo Zavet Elin Pelin Varbitsa Nesebar Oryahovo Pazardzhik Isperih Etropole Kaolinovo Pomorie Roman Batak Kubrat Zlatitsa Kaspichan Primorsko Hayredin Belovo Loznitsa Ihtiman Nikola Kozlevo Ruen Gabrovo Bratsigovo Samuil Koprivshtitsa Novi Pazar Sozopol Dryanovo
    [Show full text]
  • Priority Public Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste
    Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Develonment Europe and Central Asia Region 32051 BULGARIA Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL SEQUENCING STRATEGIES FOR EU ACCESSION PriorityPublic Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste *t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Public Disclosure Authorized IC- - ; s - o Fk - L - -. Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized May 2004 - "Wo BULGARIA ENVIRONMENTAL SEQUENCING STRATEGIES FOR EU ACCESSION Priority Public Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste May 2004 Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Europe and Central Asia Region Report No. 27770 - BUL Thefindings, interpretationsand conclusions expressed here are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. Coverphoto is kindly provided by the external communication office of the World Bank County Office in Bulgaria. The report is printed on 30% post consumer recycledpaper. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ..................................................................... i Abbreviations and Acronyms ..................................................................... ii Summary ..................................................................... iiM Introduction.iii Wastewater.iv InstitutionalIssues .xvi Recommendations........... xvii Introduction ...................................................................... 1 Part I: The Strategic Settings for
    [Show full text]
  • Health Insurance Actpdf / 7.08 MB
    Health Insurance Act Promulgated, State Gazette No. 70/19.06.1998, amended, SG No. 93/11.08.1998, SG No. 153/23.12.1998, effective 1.01.1999, SG No. 62/9.07.1999, SG No. 65/20.07.1999, amended and supplemented, SG No. 67/27.07.1999, effective 28.08.1999, amended, SG No. 69/3.08.1999, effective 3.08.1999, amended and supplemented, SG No. 110/17.12.1999, effective 1.01.2000, SG No. 113/28.12.1999, SG No. 64/4.08.2000, effective 1.10.2001, supplemented, SG No. 41/24.04.2001, effective 24.04.2001, amended and supplemented, SG No. 1/4.01.2002, effective 1.01.2002, SG No. 54/31.05.2002, effective 1.12.2002, supplemented, SG No. 74/30.07.2002, effective 1.01.2003, amended and supplemented, SG No. 107/15.11.2002, supplemented, SG No. 112/29.11.2002, amended and supplemented, SG No. 119/27.12.2002, effective 1.01.2003, amended, SG No. 120/29.12.2002, effective 1.01.2003, amended and supplemented, SG No. 8/28.01.2003, effective 1.03.2003, supplemented, SG No. 50/30.05.2003, amended, SG No. 107/9.12.2003, effective 9.12.2003, supplemented, SG No. 114/30.12.2003, effective 1.01.2004, amended and supplemented, SG No. 28/6.04.2004, effective 6.04.2004, supplemented, SG No. 38/11.05.2004, amended and supplemented, SG No. 49/8.06.2004, amended, SG No. 70/10.08.2004, effective 1.01.2005, amended and supplemented, SG No.
    [Show full text]
  • Mehedinti – Dolj – Olt – Bor – Zaječar – Vratsa – Montana – Vidin
    ROSEB Initiative Three Regions – One Experience Serbia – Romania – Bulgaria Cross-border Tourism Initiative Mehedinti – Dolj – Olt – Bor – Zaječar – Vratsa – Montana – Vidin Web site: http://arott.ro/roseb; e-mail address: [email protected]; tel: +40 251 412290 Aim and objectives ROSEB Initiative is the common trilateral initiative aiming to enhance smart, inclusive and sustainable socio – economic development through improving tourism and sustainable use of the natural and cultural heritage of the cross-border area. The ROSEB Initiative has 95 members, Local Administration, Ministries / National Authorities for Tourism, NGOs, Tour Operators and Agencies for Tourism, Clusters, High Schools, and Universities. ROSEB Initiative Specific Objectives are: • To create a Platform for cooperation in tourism by setting-up cross-border network of tourist stakeholders; • To facilitate better utilisation of joint tourism potentials by setting-up mechanisms for structured participatory processes of needs assessment, priority setting, action planning and project implementation. To this regard, ROSEB Initiative is: • Area-specific (versus countries) • Integrated (across sectors) • Inclusive (communities) • Participatory (bottom-up) • Flexible (responsive to changes). The ROSEB Initiative was formally agreed during International Tourist Fair on March 18th 2016 in Craiova, when the three organizations agreed on the content of ROSEB Initiative. The ROSEB Initiative was signed, on November 8th, 2016, in Kladovo. Why ROSEB Initiative? Tourism development in
    [Show full text]
  • CPT/Inf (2015) 12 Part
    CPT/Inf (2015) 12 part EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The CPT’s ninth visit to Bulgaria provided an opportunity to review the implementation of recommendations made after the Committee’s previous visits. Particular attention was paid to the treatment of persons in police custody and of juveniles in penitentiary establishments as well as of the conditions of detention and the provision of healthcare in prisons. The cooperation received by the Bulgarian authorities in the course of the visit was generally good. However, the principle of cooperation also requires that decisive action be taken to improve the situation in the light of the CPT’s key recommendations, and the CPT is seriously concerned by the fact that the vast majority of the Committee’s long-standing recommendations, some of them dating back to the very first periodic visit to Bulgaria in 1995, remain unimplemented. These include recommendations on ill-treatment (both in the police and prison context), inter-prisoner violence, prison overcrowding, material conditions of detention in investigation detention facilities (IDFs) and prisons, prison health-care, staffing levels, as well as discipline, segregation and contact with the outside world. In some cases, the situation has deteriorated since the 2010 and 2012 visits. The CPT is of the view that the time for words is over and that urgent and effective action must now be taken to address all these concerns. Consequently, in the light of the inaction to date, the CPT has decided to set in motion the procedure provided for in Article 10, paragraph 2, of the Convention. Policing The delegation received many allegations of deliberate physical ill-treatment of persons detained by the police (including juveniles and women), both at the time of apprehension and during questioning, consisting of slaps, punches, kicks and truncheon blows.
    [Show full text]
  • Illegal Dumpapping and Risk Assessment
    Project CB007.2.32.079 „Field laboratories for examination of the quality of water and soils” 0 The project is co-funded by EU through the Interreg-IPA CBC Bulgaria-Serbia Programme. This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union through the Interreg-IPA CBC Bulgaria-Serbia Programme, CCI No 2014TC16I5CB007. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of Boychinovtsi Municipality and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union or the Managing Authority of the Programme. Project CB007.2.32.079 „Field laboratories for examination of the quality of water and soils” Table of Contents 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 2 City of Bor................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 General information ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Geology .............................................................................................................................................................. 4 2.3 Hydrogeology .................................................................................................................................................. 5 2.4 Population .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Bulgaria Ministry of Finance
    REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE ORDER № ZMF-70 Sofia, 01.02.2021 Pursuant to Art. 183, para. 1 in connection with para. 5 and Art. 184, item 1 of the Corporate Income Tax Act I ORDER: I determine a list of municipalities with unemployment with or over 25% higher than the national average for 2020. The order to be promulgated in the State gazette and to be published on the website of the Ministry of Finance. I assign the control over the execution of the order to the director of the Tax Policy Directorate. MINISTER: KIRIL ANANIEV LIST OF MUNICIPALITIES WITH AN UNEMPLOYMENT RATE OF 25 PERCENT EQUAL TO OR HIGHER THAN THE NATIONAL AVERAGE FOR 2020 № per line District / Municipality Unemployment rate I. Blagoevgrad District 1. Bansko 12,70 2. Belitsa 38,42 3. Garmen 14,59 4. Kresna 11,27 5. Petrich 10,35 6. Razlog 12,95 7. Satovcha 14,09 8. Simitli 14,42 9. Strumyani 20,65 10. Hadzhidimovo 13,49 11. Yakoruda 30,78 II. Burgas District 1. Ruen 13,75 2. Sredets 16,18 3. Sungurlare 10,90 III. Varna District 1. Avren 13,28 2. Byala 9,98 3. Vetrino 12,24 4. Valchi dol 20,75 5. Dolni Chiflik 14,94 6. Dalgopol 20,80 7. Provadiya 10,42 8. Suvorovo 11,39 IV. Veliko Tarnovo District 1. Elena 11,58 2. Zlataritsa 19,27 3. Polski Trambesh 12,39 4. Strazhitsa 17,09 5. Suhindol 14,52 V. Vidin District 1. Belogradchik 18,55 2. Boynitsa 14,22 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 14 Consecutive No No of the Railway Line Energy Section from Station/Block Post to Station/Block Post Track No 1 Track No
    Annex 14 List of electrified/non-electrified railway lines of SE NRIC Consecutive No of the Energy from station/block post to station/block post Track No 1 Track No 2 Track No 3 No railway line section 1 1 Sofia Dimitrovgrad RS Kalotina Zapad electrified 2 1 Sofia Kalotina Zapad Kalotina electrified 3 1 Sofia Kalotina Dragoman electrified 4 1 Sofia Dragoman Aldomirovtsi electrified 5 1 Sofia Aldomirovtsi Slivnitsa electrified 6 1 Sofia Slivnitsa Petarch electrified 7 1 Sofia Petarch Kostinbrod electrified 8 1 Sofia Kostinbrod Voluyak electrified 9 1 Sofia Voluyak Sofia electrified electrified 10 1 Sofia Sofia Poduyane Patnicheska electrified electrified 11 1 Sofia Poduyane Patnicheska Iskar electrified electrified 12 1 Sofia Iskar Kazichene electrified electrified 13 1 Sofia Kazichene Elin Pelin electrified electrified 14 1 Sofia Elin Pelin Vakarel electrified electrified 15 1 Sofia Vakarel Verinsko electrified electrified 16 1 Sofia Verinsko Ihtiman electrified electrified 17 1 Sofia Ihtiman Kostenets electrified electrified 18 1 Sofia Kostenets Belovo electrified electrified 19 1 Plovdiv Belovo Septemvri electrified electrified 20 1 Plovdiv Septemvri Pazardzhik electrified electrified 21 1 Plovdiv Pazardzhik Ognyanovo electrified electrified 22 1 Plovdiv Ognyanovo Stamboliyski electrified electrified 23 1 Plovdiv Stamboliyski Todor Kableshkov electrified electrified 24 1 Plovdiv Todor Kableshkov Plovdiv electrified electrified 25 1 Plovdiv Plovdiv Por Iztok electrified electrified 26 1 Plovdiv Plovdiv Por Iztok electrified electrified
    [Show full text]
  • National Implementation Plan Bulgaria
    NATIONAL ERTMS DEPLOYMENT PLAN OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA Introduction The National ERTMS Deployment Plan is oriented towards creation of a modern and competitive railway network whereas full capacity of information and communication technologies is used with the purpose of effective traffic management to be reached. Quickness, simultaneousness and completeness upon realization which may be treated as a strategic priority, and may also lead to a maximum return under consideration of a longer period of time. The intents of the Republic of Bulgaria for implementation ERTMS/ETCS are represented within the frame of the Plan. The choice has been made on the grounds of a preliminary cost-benefit analysis (CBA) and the railway infrastructure projects proposed for the period 2007 – 2013 under the Sectoral Operational Programme on Transport (SOPT). The basic parameters are: time horizon; improvement of capacity after implementation of the selected type of ERTMS/ETCS; percentage of average increase of traffic on annual basis; results of costs-benefit analysis and investments needed. Vidin Ruse Lom Kardam Brusartsi Boychinovtsi Pleven Montana Dobrich Targovishte Vratsa Cherven Bryag Levski Popovo Shumen Varna Mezdra Pavlikeni G. Oryahovitsa Kalotina V. Tarnovo Sofia Karlovo Sliven Pernik Dabovo Karnobat Radomir Kazanlak Yambo Burgas St. Zagora N. Zagora Dupnitsa Kyustendil Pazardjik Blagoevgrad Plovdiv Dimitrovgrad Svilengrad Kulata 2 Trans-European Corridor X Kalotina – Sofia - Svilengrad Falls into three sections: Kalotina-Sofia; Sofia-Plovdiv;
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria 2020 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS
    Voluntary National Review SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS Bulgaria 2020 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS 1. End poverty in all its forms everywhere 2. End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition, and promote sustainable agriculture 3. Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages 4. Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all 5. Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls 6. Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all 7. Ensure access to a!ordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all 8. Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all 9. Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization, and foster innovation 10. Reduce inequality within and among countries 11. Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable 12. Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns 13. Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts 14. Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development 15. Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat deserti"cation, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss 16. Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build e!ective, accountable and inclusive institutions
    [Show full text]