DOCSLIB.ORG

The European Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The European Council THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL MILAN 28-29 JUNE 1985 Documents in the dossier include: European Council in Milan Reproduced from the Bulletin of the European Communities, No. 6/1985 Milan Summit Advances Eureka Project European Community News No. 21/1985 European Community Information Service Washington DC European Council in Milan 1. The European Council opened at to tackle the main problems-which you the Castello Sforza in Milan on the morning are as familiar with as lam. of 28 June and finished in the evening of 29 June. Taking part were the Italian Prime On institutional matters, Mr Craxi noted Minister, Mr Bettino Craxi, who took the that the political requirements were satis- chair, the President of the French Republic fied for convening an intergovernmental Mr Fran~ois Mitterrand, the Belgian Prime conference to draft a treaty on a common Minister, Mr Wilfried Martens, the Chan- foreign and security policy and, in accord- cellor of the Federal Republic of Germany, ance with Article 236 of the EEC Treaty, to Mr Helmut Kohl, the Danish Prime Minis- draw up the amendments to the EEC Treaty ter, Mr Pol Schluter, the Greek Prime Minis- that were needed to enable institutional changes to be ter, Mr Andreas Papandreou, the Taoise~ made in the Council' ach, Mr Garret FitzGerald, the Luxembourg decision-making procedure the Com- mission s executive power and the powers Prime Minister, Mr Jacques Santer, the Dutch Prime Minister, Mr Rudolf Lubbers of Parliament, and the extension of Com- and the United Kingdom Prime Minister munity activities into new areas as proposed Mrs Margaret Thatcher. by the Dooge and Adonnino Committees. In the course of the European Council's The Heads of State or Government were proceedings the Belgian , German , French accompanied by their respective Foreign Irish, Italian, Luxembourg and Netherlands Ministers. The Commission was rep- Governments came out in favour of holding resented by Mr Jacques Delors, President such a conference, while the British, Danish and Mr Lorenzo Natali, Vice-President. and Greek Governments were against the Also present as observers were the Prime idea. Ministers of Spain and Portugal , Felipe Gonzalez and Mario Soares, and their Mr Craxi concluded that the Presidency Foreign Ministers. would convene the conference once the for- mal procedures required had been com- This was the first occasion on which the pleted. The Spanish and Portuguese European Council did not have to deal with Governments would be invited to take part. urgent outstanding questions or settle dis- putes, but could look firmly to the future. Conclusions of the Mr Delors, taking stock of the Milan Sum- European Council mit, said at a press conference: ' Firstly, as regards the Community dynamic, this meet- ing saw the emergence of a broader, deeper Institutional affairs and in a way more serious awareness of the challenges facing Europe than I have ever 2.2. The European Council held a wide-ranging discussion on the proposals of the ad hoc Commit- seen or even read about. The meeting has tee for Institutional Affairs set up at Fontainebleau, also shown a more confident determination and the draft mandate of the Italian Presidency and than usual to face up to these challenges. in particular On the improvement of the Council' What further proof could be needed than decision-making procedure, the enlargement of the the very great interest shown by the Euro- European Parliament s role, the Commission pean Council in our proposals on the administrative powers and the strengthening of internal market and the problems of tech- political cooperation in the general context of the nology, and on economic questions in gen- transition to European union. eral ... I believe, then, that this European It confirmed the need to improve the operation of Council will stand in the history of Europe the Community in order to give concrete form to as a kind of turning point in the Europeans the objectives it has set itself, in particular as regards the completion of the internal market by resolve not only to survive , but to assert 1992 and measures to promote a technological themselves independently and to join forces Europe. Bull. EC 6-1985 Milan European Council The European Council noted that the President to it at its December meeting on the progress of the Council would submit proposals for the achieved. improvement of the Council' s decision-making procedure, the exercise of the Commission The European Council accepted the suggestions administrative powers and the Parliament s pow~ along the same lines contained in the French mem- ers with a view to their early adoption. orandum on a People s Europe and emphasized in particular the sections of that document COncern- The European Council discussed in detail the con- ing young people, culture and health. In this Con- vening of a conference to work out the following text, the European Council emphasized the value with a view to achieving com:rete progress on of launching a European action programme European Union: against cancer. (i) a treaty on a common foreign and security With regard to the measures contained in the initial policy on the basis of the Franco-German and report and approved by the European Council in United Kingdom drafts; March 1985, the European Council expressed its (ii) the amendments to the EEC Treaty in accord- concern at the delay in implementing them and ance with Article 236 of that Treaty, required for asked the Council , the Member States and the the implementation of the institutional changes Commission, each acting within its own powers concerning the Council' s decision-making pro- to take the necessary decisions to remedy this cedure, the Commission s executive power and situation as soon as possible. the powers of the European Parliament and the extension to new spheres of activity in accordance with the proposals of the Dooge Committee and Economic and social situation the Adonnino Committee, as set out elsewhere, and taking into account certain aspects of the 1.2.4. The European Council discussed the econ- Commission proposal concerning the freedom of omic and social situation on the basis of two movement of persons. reports submitted by the Presidency on the future of the EMS and on the problem of investment and The President noted that the required majority as employment in the context of the implementation laid down in Article 236 of the Treaty had been of the strategy defined in Dublin in December obtained for the convening of such a Conference. 1984. The Portuguese and Spanish Governments would be invited to take part in that Conference. The As regards the EMS, the Commission was invited Belgian, German, French, Irish, Italian, Luxem- to continue its consideration of its development bourg and Netherlands delegations were in favour including the role of the ECU, at Council meetings of holding that Conference. on economic and financial affairs and with the Governors of the Central Banks. The Presidency would consequently take the steps necessary to convene that Conference with a view As regards short-term economic policy, the Coun- to submitting the results for a decision by the Cil of Ministers for Economic and Financial Affairs Heads of State or Government at the European was invited to consider the extent to which the Council meeting in Luxembourg. convergence which had already been achieved between the Member States in the field of inflation A people s Europe and imbalances made it possible to intensify the battle against unemployment. 1.2.3. The European Council thanked the ad hoc ana more general level, the European Council Committee on a People s Europe for its initial invited the Commission to submit to the European report and for its final report submitted in Milan, Council meeting in December a detailed report both of which contained numerous concrete meas- on current inadequacies as regards growth and ures aimed at involving the citizens of Europe more employment in the European economy compared determinedly in the construction of the Com- to that of its major competitors amongst the indus" munity. trialized countries and on the new strategies that With regard to the latter report, the European could be implemented to remedy the situation. Council approved the proposals which it con- tained. Those proposals concerned inter alia citi- zens' rights , culture, youth, education and sport. Completion of the internal market The European Council instructed the Commission and the Member States, acting within their respect- 1.2.5. The Council welcomed the white paper on ive powers, to take the necessary implementing completing the internal market, submitted at its measures, and instructed the Council to report request by the Commission. Bull. EC 6- 1985 Milan European Council 1. It instructed the Council to initiate a precise 4. The Council of Ministers was asked to study programme of action, based on the white paper the institutional conditions in and the conditions on the basis of which customs which the com- pletion of the internal market could be achieved union had been brought about, with a view to within the desired time limits. achieving completely and effectively the conditions for a single market in the Community by 1992 at the latest, in accordance with stages fixed in Technology relation to previously determined priorities and a binding timetable. 6. The European Council noted a collective effort to master new technology was a condition Progress towards this objective should be both for maintaining European competitiveness. It gradual and visible and the European Council therefore decided to give the Community a new therefore requested the Commission to submit its technological dimension. proposals swiftly and the Council to ensUre that they were adopted within the deadlines established The European Council approved and endorsed in the timetable.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How Big Is Belgium's Love Still for Europe? - the Low Countries 29/05/2020 21:18
    How Big Is Belgium's Love Still for Europe? - the low countries 29/05/2020 21:18 © Trui Chielens Zero Point 1945 SOCIETY HISTORY How Big Is Belgium's Love Still for Europe? By Ellen Vanderschueren, Jasper Praet, Hendrik Vos translated by Elisabeth Salverda 29/05/2020 ! 11 min reading time After the Second World War, Belgium was one of Europe’s founders. Over the years, Belgian politicians have played a prominent role in European politics. There was always a shared feeling among the population that integration with Europe was useful and in the national interest. In recent times, however, this consensus has been somewhat worn down. n 2009, the first President of the European Council to be appointed was a I Belgian, when Herman Van Rompuy became “President of Europe”. Five years later Donald Tusk, a former prime minister of Poland, took over the helm. And five years after that, in 2019, the role fell to a Belgian once more: Charles Michel fit the jigsaw of nominations and was asked by his colleagues to chair the European Council. Belgians have quite often had a steering role in European politics. Belgium was one of the founders of the European project, and has played a very active role over the years in its process of integration. https://www.the-low-countries.com/article/how-big-is-belgiums-love-still-for-europe Pagina 1 van 15 How Big Is Belgium's Love Still for Europe? - the low countries 29/05/2020 21:18 Herman Van Rompuy and Charles Michel, the first and current President of the European Council Much has changed over the past seventy years: the Community with a focus on coal and steel has grown into a European Union that plays a significant role in almost all economic and political spheres.
    [Show full text]
  • The Luxembourgish EU Presidency and Financial Services – July-December 2015
    The Luxembourgish EU Presidency and Financial Services – July-December 2015 The Luxembourgish EU Presidency and Financial Services 1 July – 31 December 2015 Kreab Brussels 2 avenue de Tervueren, 1040 Brussels, Belgium www.kreab.com/brussels – @KreabEU 1 The Luxembourgish EU Presidency and Financial Services – July-December 2015 Contents Political Context of the Luxembourgish Presidency 3 Priorities of the Luxembourgish Presidency 4 Key Financial Services Initiatives and Legislative Dossiers 5 Organisation of the Luxembourgish Presidency 12 Annex I – Contact Information 13 Permanent Representation of Luxembourg to the European Union 13 Economy and Finance 14 Government of Luxembourg 16 Ministry of Finance of Luxembourg 17 Bank of Luxembourg 18 Financial Regulatory Body of Luxembourg 20 Annex II – CVs of Key Luxembourgish Ministers 21 Annex III – Provisional Calendar 23 Annex IV – Key Council Meetings 25 Annex V – Country Fact Sheet 26 Annex VI – The EU Presidency 28 2 The Luxembourgish EU Presidency and Financial Services – July-December 2015 Political Context of the Luxembourgish Presidency The Grand Duchy of Luxembourg will assume its twelfth Presidency of the Council of the European Union on 1 July 2015. Luxembourg is one of the smallest countries in the EU, but it is also the wealthiest per capita. Following Italy and Latvia, Luxembourg is the third in this Presidency Trio, and will be the second full Presidency to work with the new Commission headed by compatriot and former Prime Minister Jean-Claude Juncker. Luxembourg is the seat of several major institutions such as the European Court of Justice, the European Investment Bank, and the Court of Auditors. Attitude toward the EU Luxembourg is one of the six founding members of the European Union and has historically played a key role in its formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme of the Youth, Peace and Security Conference
    1 Wednesday, 23 May European Parliament – open to all participants – 12:00 – 13:00 Registration European Parliament Accreditation Centre (right-hand side of the Simone Veil Agora entrance to the Altiero Spinelli building) 13:00 – 14:00 Buffet lunch reception Members’ Restaurant, Altiero Spinelli building 14:00 – 15:00 Opening Session Room 5G-3, Altiero Spinelli building Keynote Address by Mr. Antonio Tajani, President of the European Parliament Chair Ms. Heidi Hautala, Vice-President of the European Parliament Speakers Ms. Mariya Gabriel, EU Commissioner for Digital Economy and Society Mr. Oscar Fernandez-Taranco, UN Assistant Secretary-General for Peacebuilding Support Ms. Ivana Tufegdzic, fYROM, EP Young Political Leaders Mr. Dereje Wordofa, UNFPA Deputy Executive Director Ms. Nour Kaabi, Tunisia, NET-MED Youth – UNESCO Mr. Oyewole Simon Oginni, Nigeria, Former AU-EU Youth Fellow 2 15:00 – 16:30 Parallel Thematic Panel Discussions Panel I Youth inclusion for conflict prevention and sustaining peace Library reading room, Altiero Spinelli building Discussants Ms. Soraya Post, Member of the European Parliament Mr. Oscar Fernandez-Taranco, UN Assistant Secretary-General for Peacebuilding Support Mr. Christian Leffler, Deputy Secretary-General, European External Action Service Mr. Amnon Morag, Israel, EP Young Political Leaders Ms. Hela Slim, France, Former AU-EU Youth Fellow Mr. MacDonald K. Munyoro, Zimbabwe, EP Young Political Leaders Facilitator Ms. Gizem Kilinc, United Network of Young Peacebuilders Panel II Young people innovating for peace Library room 128, Altiero Spinelli building Discussants Ms. Barbara Pesce-Monteiro, Director, UN/UNDP Representation Office in Brussels Ms. Anna-Katharina Deininger, OSCE CiO Special Representative and OSG Focal Point on Youth and Security Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament, Daily Notebook: Motion of Censure on the Commission (11 January 1999)
    European Parliament, Daily Notebook: motion of censure on the Commission (11 January 1999) Caption: The Daily Notebook details the reactions of some MEPs during a debate concerning the motion of censure on the activities of the Commission in January 1999. Source: EUROPARL - Press Service. Session News - The Daily Notebook. [ON-LINE]. [s.l.]: European Parliament, [03.08.2000]. Disponible sur http://www.europarl.eu.int/dg3/sdp/journ/en/1999/n9901112.htm#2. Copyright: (c) European Parliament URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/european_parliament_daily_notebook_motion_of_censure_on_the_commission_11_january_19 99-en-da75f293-0cc5-473e-a221-6978c1852b19.html Last updated: 28/04/2014 1 / 7 28/04/2014 European Parliament: Daily Notebook (11 January 1999) Commission faces censure (B4-1165/98, B4-0012/99, B4-0011/99, B4-0002/99, B4-0013/99, B4-0014/99, B4-0016/99, B4-0015) Monday 11 January — In tabling her motion of censure on the Commission, Pauline Green (London North, PES) declared that the decision to refuse discharge of the 1996 budget was a clear declaration that the Commission was financially incompetent. Those who voted to refuse discharge should take the only possible institutional step in their power and vote to sack the Commission. Mrs Green stated that she had tabled the censure motion so that those who felt the Commission to be culpable over the 1996 budget should face up to their responsibility and the logical consequences of their vote. She argued that the coming three months were critical for the EU and that the Commission needed to enjoy a partnership of trust and confidence with Parliament and Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Marvin Leath
    B A Y L O R U N I V E R S I T Y C o l l e c t i o n s o f P o l i t i c a l M a t e r i a l s P a p e r s o f M A R V I N L E A T H P R E L I M I N A R Y I N V E N T O R Y Boxes sent from Washington: 1-67; 116-160. Boxes 68-115 presumed lost in transit in early 1991. B O X D e s c r i p t i o n Y e a r 1 Corr. Numbered files 8300 - 9199 Dec. 1981 - Feb. 1982 2 Corr. Numbered files 9200 - 9999 Feb. 1982 – Mar. 1982 3 Corr. Numbered files 10000 – 10799 Mar. 1982 4 Corr. Numbered files 10800 – 11699 Mar. 1982 – Apr. 1982 5 Corr. Numbered files 11700 – 12299 Apr. 1982 - May 1982 6 Corr. Numbered files 12300 – 12999 May 1982 7 Corr. Numbered files 13000 – 13699 May 1982 – June 1982 8 Corr. Numbered files 13700 – 14399 June 1982 – July 1982 9 Corr. Numbered files 14400 – 15099 July 1982 – Aug. 1982 1 0 Corr. Numbered files 15100 – 15799 Aug. 1982 – Sept. 1982 1 1 Corr. Numbered files 15800 – 16399 Sept. 1982 – Nov. 1982 1 2 Corr. Numbered files 16400 – 17199 Nov. 1982 – Dec. 1982 1 3 Corr. Numbered files 17200 – 17462 Jan. 1983 1 4 Corr. Numbered files 14475 – 17690 + forms Jan. 1983 1 5 Corr.
    [Show full text]
  • Next Generation EU: Has the Hamiltonian Moment Come for Europe? DI LUCA LIONELLO*
    ISSN 2384-9169 Fascicolo n. 4 - 2020 rivista.eurojus.it Next Generation EU: has the Hamiltonian moment come for Europe? DI LUCA LIONELLO* Table of Contents: 1. Introduction. – 2. Why did the EU finally decide to create a common fiscal instrument? – 2.1. The Maastricht paradigm and its adaptations. – 2.2. The outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic and the risks of destabilisation for the Union. – 2.3. The structural limits of the economic governance. – 2.4. The ECB in action: the difficulty to repeat “whatever it takes”. – 3. Next Generation EU: main features and functioning. – 3.1. From the Franco-German proposal to the agreement of the European Council. – 3.2. Next Generation EU and the new Multiannual Financial Framework. – 4. The main innovations of Next Generation EU. – 4.1. European debt. – 4.2. Transfer mechanism. – 4.3. Shaping a common macroeconomic policy. – 4.4. Revitalising the community method. – 4.5. Weakening the control of national parliaments on fiscal policy. – 5. Conclusive remarks. 1. Introduction Many commenters hailed the decision to establish a new EU “recovery fund”, namely “Next Generation EU” (NGEU), as a turning point in the process of European integration. For the first time in its history, the Union will be allowed to borrow significant resources from the financial markets and use them to support national economies severely hit by the pandemic Covid-19. Aside from the positive effects on the stability of the euro area and the single market, such an instrument may also have a strategic relevance for the future development of the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the European Union
    SAMPLE SYLLABUS – SUBJECT TO CHANGE POL-UA 9595L01 Understanding the European Union NYU London Instructor Information ● Dr. Eiko Thielemann ● Individual meetings can usually be arranged for before or after class. Course Information ● Tuesdays 9:00 – 12:00 ● Location: Room 303 ● Prerequisites: none Course Overview and Goals The European Union constitutes the most prominent experiment in peaceful international cooperation in world history. The course will explore the origins, evolution and impact of the European Union. You will be introduced to the workings of the EU institutions such as the Council, the Commission, the Parliament and the Court of Justice. We will also explore the key areas of EU competence, such as the European Single Currency, the Single Market and free movement, asylum & immigration, the Common Agricultural Policy etc. Through small group debates, we will address questions such as: Is the European Union an economic giant but a political dwarf? Why is the EU so controversial among the European public? Why did the UK vote for Brexit and what will that mean for both Britain and the EU? Can the EU effectively manage immigration? How can the EU's institutions be made more democratic? Will the EURO survive? How far and how fast should the EU be enlarged? Will Europe develop into a federal (super) state? Course delivery will be through short lectures, small group discussions and in-class debates. Upon Completion of this Course, students will be able to critically analyze: ● the European integration process; ● the operation of the EU as a political system; ● the process of EU policy-making; ● and the EU’s role in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Luxembourg Compromise- Council of the European Community Ignores British At- Tempt to Exercise Implied Veto Power of Luxembourg Compromise
    RECENT DEVELOPMENTS EUROPEAN COMMUNITY-LUXEMBOURG COMPROMISE- COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY IGNORES BRITISH AT- TEMPT TO EXERCISE IMPLIED VETO POWER OF LUXEMBOURG COMPROMISE On May 18, 1982, the Council of the European Community adopted a proposal for a 10.4% farm price increase, disregarding an attempted British veto of the measure.' The British voted against the proposal primarily as a means of protesting the sepa- rate, unresolved issue of the United Kingdom's budget contribu- tion' to the European Community (EC). S The British claimed au- thority to exercise de facto veto power under the Luxembourg Compromise,4 a seventeen year-old joint statement on EC Council See 15 BULL. EUR. COMM. (No. 5) 7-9 (1982). See The Day Britain'sBluff Was Called, ECONOMIST, May 22, 1982, at 77 [hereinafter cited as ECONOMIST]. Disagreement over the United Kingdom's budget contribution to the EC has been a perennial problem from the time the United Kingdom joined the Commu- nity. The British feel they have not received a fair return on their contribution to Commu- nity operating expenses. A temporary settlement of the issue was made a week after the May 18 majority vote, with further agreement that the question of a more permanent settle- ment would be taken up later. (Euromarket News] COMMON MKT. REP. (CCH) No. 699, at 1 (June 9, 1982). ' European economic cooperation was formalized in the Treaty Establishing the Euro- pean Economic Community (Treaty of Rome), done March 25, 1957, 298 U.N.T.S. 11 (unof- ficial English version) [hereinafter cited as EEC Treaty].
    [Show full text]
  • The End of Détente* a Case Study of the 1980 Moscow Olympics
    The End of Détente* A Case Study of the 1980 Moscow Olympics By Thomas Smith After the election of autonomous and must resist all pressure of any Jimmy Carter as US kind whatsoever, whether of a political, religious President, Prime or economic nature.”1 With British government Minister Margaret documents from 1980 recently released under the Thatcher flew to Thirty Year Rule, the time seems apt to evaluate the Washington on 17th debate about the Olympic boycott, and to ask the December 1979 for question: to what extent was the call by the British her first official visit. government for a boycott of the 1980 Moscow Five days later NATO Olympics an appropriate response to the invasion of announced the de- Afghanistan? ployment of a new Before the argument of the essay is established, it generation of American is first necessary to provide a brief narrative of the rockets and Cruise main events. Thatcher’s government began discussing missiles in Western the idea of a boycott in early January 1980; however, Europe. On the 25th their first action was to call for the Olympics to be December Soviet moved to a different location. Once the IOC declared troops marched into that relocating the Olympics was out of the question, Afghanistan. Thatcher told the House of Commons that she was now advising athletes not to go to Moscow and wrote Photo: U.S. Government to Sir Denis Follows, Chairman of the BOA, informing Introduction him of the government’s decision. The BOA, which was Britain’s NOC and the organisation that could During the 1970s, relations between the West and the accept or decline the invitation to the Olympics, Soviet Union were marked by an era of détente.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-Activity-Report.Pdf
    — 2020 — WILFRIED MARTENS CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN STUDIES ACTIVITY REPORT © February 2021 - Wilfried Martens Centre for European Studies 2020’s label will unfortunately be, above all, the year of Table of Contents the COVID-19 pandemic. It has marked the fates of many people, the way of life we used to enjoy, the way in which we communicated and worked, and in fact the entire world. On one hand, it has caused unprecedent fear for Welcome 04 human lives, but on the other hand it stimulated signifi- cant ones, such as the great effort to effectively coordi- nate the fight against the virus and the decision to create the Recovery Fund – Next Generation EU. However, we Publications 07 ended the year with the faith that the vaccines humanity European View 08 developed will save human lives and gradually get the Publications in 2020 10 situation under control, also eliminating the pandemic’s devastating impact on the economy. Another sad moment of 2020 for the EU was, of course, the UK’s official exit. It was a very painful process, but Events 13 largely chaotic on the British side. Even though we Events in 2020 14 parted “in an orderly fashion”, the consequences will be Economic Ideas Forum Brussels 2020 16 felt on both sides for years to come. 10th Transatlantic Think Tank Conference 20 Another unquestionably significant event of 2020 was the US presidential election. The pandemic, along with the events surrounding the US election, such as the Common Projects 23 attack on the Capitol, proved how fragile democracy NET@WORK 24 is, as are we.
    [Show full text]
  • The Power of Initiative of the European Commission: a Progressive Erosion?
    The Power of Initiative of the European Commission: A Progressive Erosion? Paolo PONZANO, Costanza HERMANIN and Daniela CORONA Preface by António Vitorino Studies & 89 Research Study & The Power of Initiative 89 of the European Commission: Research A Progressive Erosion? PAOLO PONZANO, COSTANZA HERMANIN AND DANIELA CORONA Preface by António Vitorino Paolo PONZANO is a senior fellow at the European University Institute and a special adviser of the European Commission. Former collaborator of Altiero Spinelli at the Institute for International Affairs in Rome, he has worked for the European Commission from 1971 to 2009. He was formerly Director for Relations with the Council of ministers, subsequently for Institutional Matters and Better Regulation. He was also Alternate Member of the European Convention in 2002/2003. He published several articles and chapters on the EU institutions. He teaches European Governance and Decision-Making at the University of Florence and at the European College of Parma as well as European Law at the University of Rome. Costanza HERMANIN is a researcher in the department of social and political science of the European University Institute, where she is about to complete her PhD. Her research interests comprise EU social and immigration policy, EU institutional affairs, and human rights and immigration policy in Italy. She has been visiting fellow at several places (WZB, CERI, Columbia, Berkeley). She is the co-editor of a forthcoming book on “Fighting Race Discrimination in Europe” (Routledge, 2012). She has been publishing on Italian and English speaking journals. Daniela CORONA is currently research collaborator at the Robert Schuman Center for Advanced Studies at the European University Institute in Florence where she completed her PhD.
    [Show full text]
  • 1980 Through 1985 Carolyn Wadsworth, MS, PT, OCS, CHT
    As Dreams Became Realities: 1980 through 1985 Carolyn Wadsworth, MS, PT, OCS, CHT The Orthopaedic Section is celebrating its 25th anniversary during 1999. The strength the Section now enjoys was made possible through the foresight and energy of a group of physical therapists of great purpose, vision, and organization acumen. Our 25th year seems an appropriate time at which to recount their efforts and to acquaint ourselves with the people, events, and initiatives that helped shape the Section in its first quarter century. This article is the second of a 4-part series depicting the Orthopaedic Section History. It covers the period from 1980 through 1985. Stanley Paris and Dorothy Santi eloquently described the events leading to the Section’s inception in the January issue of Orthopaedic Physical Therapy Practice. They gave us fascinating insights into the challenges and victories that occurred during the 1970s, our Section’s formative years. We hardly knew an infancy! With membership doubling every 2 years between 1974 and 1979, we were off the growth chart of traditional human development. You could say that we hit the ground running. As the Orthopaedic Section embarked upon the 1980s, we faced the stark realization that we must assume responsibility for the institution we had created with our youthful energy and enthusiasm. We had come of age. Our founding leadership had tested the waters and established the Section as a significant component of the APTA. It was up to the next tier to devise a plan and guidelines for continuing to achieve our mission. How must be proceed? The Section was already widely recognized for its intensity, commitment, and vision.
    [Show full text]