Texas-Mexico Border Transportation Master Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Texas-Mexico Border Transportation Master Plan

Project Evaluation - Implementation Term El Paso/Santa Teresa/Chihuahua Region ¤£54 N e w M e x i c o Las Cruces 10 10 ¨¦§ Fort Bliss 375 Castner Range UV ¨¦§ Good Neighbor Bridge 62 Fort Bliss Santa ¤£ 54 Teresa Bridge of the Americas ¤£ Santa Teresa-San Jerónimo Franklin Mountains El Paso El Paso Midland State Park UV601 El Paso Odessa ¤£85 International Ysleta-Zaragoza Bridge Te x a s UV375 Ciudad Paso Del Norte Bridge Juárez ¤£285 20 2 ¨¦§ 10 +* Pecos Ciudad Juárez UV375 ¨¦§ Fort Hancock 385 Tornillo-Guadalupe International Bridge ¤£ El +*45 Porvenir Van Horn ¨¦§10 Fort Hancock El Porvenir Bridge Fort Stockton Socorro ¨¦§10 +*10 ¤£67 Marfa TX170 El 90 Miguel ¤£ ¤£67 Presidio C h i h u a h u a Presidio Bridge +*16 Ojinaga TX170 Presidio +*45 Ojinaga Redford 16 +* Terlingua Implementation Term Presidio Railroad Short Bridge Medium C o a h u i l a Long Chihuahua !^ Eagle Pass Short Medium16 Long +* 0 20 40 60 80 Miles ¯ 0 50 100 150 200 Kilometers Project Evaluation - Implementation Term Laredo/Coahuila/Nuevo León/Tamaulipas Region Austin!^ 90 ¤£ 1588 277 277 ¤£ ¤£ Houston ¤£57 Te x a s Eagle Pass Piedras 277 Lake Amistad Dam Crossing San Antonio Negras ¤£ Del Rio UV480 Del Rio-Ciudad Acuna International Bridge *+2 Ciudad 57 *+ 1021 Acuña Eagle Pass Bridge 35 Piedras ¨¦§ Eagle Pass Negras Laredo ¨¦§37 1472 35 £83 ¨¦§ Camino Real International Bridge ¤ +*2 *+2 ¤£59 Laredo World Trade Bridge Laredo ¤£59 C o a h u i l a Int'l Airport Laredo-Colombia Solidarity Bridge *+90 Nuevo Laredo UV359 UV20 Laredo 85 *+ 83 Nuevo Laredo Gateway to the Americas Bridge ¤£ +*57 Juarez-Lincoln Bridge *+2 Implementation Term Short N u e v o Medium L e ó n Long +*85 Short Gulf of Mexico Medium Long 30 0 25 50 75 100 +* Miles ¯ 0 50 100 150 200 Kilometers Project Evaluation - Implementation Term Rio Grande Valley/Tamaulipas Region Te x a s ¨¦§37 ¤£181 C o a h u i l a ¨¦§35 McAllen ¨¦§69C ¨¦§2 ¨¦§2 ¤£59 +*2 Laredo Nuevo 77 ¤£ Reynosa Laredo 281 +*40 +*2 57 ¤£ 97 +* +* +*80 +*85 +*2 Lake Falcon Dam Crossing ¨¦§69E 69E ¨¦§2 Harlingen Roma-Ciudad Miguel Aleman Bridge ¨¦§69C ¨¦§ Mc Allen Gulf of Mexico ¨¦§2 Rio Grande City Camargo Bridge 2 +*2D Los Ebanos Ferry ¨¦§ Brownsville UV550 Reynosa Anzalduas International Bridge Veterans International Bridge Los Indios +*2 at Los Tomates +*2 +*40 Matamoros Monterrey !^ Saltillo !^ McAllen-Hidalgo-Reynosa Bridge Gateway International Bridge Pharr-Reynosa International Bridge on the Rise B and M Bridge Donna International Bridge West Rail Bridge ¨¦§69E Weslaco-Progreso International Bridge UV550 Implementation Term Free Trade Bridge Brownsville +*2 Short 101 Medium N u e v o +* Long L e ó n Matamoros Short +*101 Medium Ta m a u l i p a s Long 0 25 50 75 100 Miles ¯ 0 50 100 150 200 Kilometers.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Metering Update
METERING UPDATE MAY 2020 STEPHANIE LEUTERT, SAVITRI ARVEY, ELLIE EZZELL, AND MARIANNE RICHARDSON CENTER FOR U.S.-MEXICAN STUDIES UC San Diego School of Global Policy & Strategy INTRODUCTION Since April 2018, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officials have been stationed at the United States’ international boundary with Mexico and have informed arriving asylum seekers that U.S. ports of entry are full. Simultaneously, CBP officials also began accepting limited numbers of asylum seekers each day, in a process that is known as metering. As lines of asylum seekers grew longer in border cities, Mexican authorities and civil society groups responded by providing humanitarian assistance and creating informal waitlists. On March 20, 2020, CBP stopped processing asylum seekers at ports of entry, due to the spread of COVID-19. At this time, CBP announced that it would only be processing individuals for essential travel at U.S. ports of entry, and did not include processing asylum seekers in its list of essential travel activities. This announcement has been repeatedly extended, with the current update noting that CBP’s changes would remain in place until June 22, 2020. This report by the Robert S. Strauss Center at The University of Texas at Austin and the Center for U.S.- Mexican Studies (USMEX) at the University of California San Diego provides an update on metering along the U.S.-Mexico border amid CBP’s suspension. It covers how the shutdown has affected metering lists and asylum seekers along the border, and how migrant shelters have responded to the spread of COVID-19.
[Show full text]
Índice Básico De Las Ciudades Prósperas City Prosperity Index, Cpi • 2018 Medición • Nivel Básico
ÍNDICE BÁSICO DE LAS CIUDADES PRÓSPERAS CITY PROSPERITY INDEX, CPI • 2018 MEDICIÓN • NIVEL BÁSICO Estados Unidos de América Río Bravo Tamaulipas, México CPI FORTALECER POLÍTICAS URBANAS 51.45 Reynosa Río Bravo Valle Hermoso Matamoros ÍNDICE BÁSICO DE LAS CIUDADES PRÓSPERAS CITY PROSPERITY INDEX, CPI • 2018 MEDICIÓN • NIVEL BÁSICO Río Bravo Tamaulipas, México ÍNDICE BÁSICO DE LAS CIUDADES PRÓSPERAS CITY PROSPERITY INDEX, CPI • 2018 MEDICIÓN • NIVEL BÁSICO Río Bravo Tamaulipas, México CPI FORTALECER POLÍTICAS URBANAS 51.45 8 EXENCIÓN DE RESPONSABILIDAD Las denominaciones usadas y la presentación del material de este informe no expresan la opinión de la Secretaría de las Naciones Unidas en lo referente al estado legal de ningún país, territorio, ciudad o área, o de sus autoridades. Ni tampoco en lo que se refiere a la delimitación de sus fronteras o límites, ni en lo relacionado con su sistema económico o nivel de desarrollo. Los análisis, conclusiones y recomendaciones del informe no reflejan necesariamente los puntos de vista del Programa de las Naciones Unidas para los Asentamientos Humanos, ni de su Consejo de Administración, ni de sus Estados miembros. México, noviembre de 2018 6 CRÉDITOS Maimunah Mohd Sharif David Penchyna Grub Directora Ejecutiva Dirección General del Infonavit Eduardo López Moreno Mario Macías Robles Director de Investigación y Desarrollo de Dirección Sectorial de los Trabajadores Capacidades Sebastián B. Fernández Cortina Elkin Velasquez Monsalve Dirección Sectorial Empresarial Director Regional para América Latina
[Show full text]
“Control...Over the Entire State of Coahuila” an Analysis of Testimonies in Trials Against Zeta Members in San Antonio, Austin, and Del Rio, Texas
“Control...Over the Entire State of Coahuila” An analysis of testimonies in trials against Zeta members in San Antonio, Austin, and Del Rio, Texas NOVEMBER 2017 This report does not represent the official position of the School of Law or the University of Texas, and the views presented here reflect only the opinions of the individual authors and of the Human Rights Clinic 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................ 3 2. INTRODUCTION .................................................................. 5 A. Project Description And Purpose ............................................... 5 B. The Trials ................................................................... 6 I. The San Antonio Trial..................................................... 6 II. The Austin Trials ......................................................... 7 III. The Del Rio Trial ......................................................... 9 C. Background Information ...................................................... 9 I. Mexico’s Security Strategy ................................................. 9 II. Coahuila, Mexico ......................................................... 10 III. Brief History of the Zeta Cartel ............................................. 11 3. FINDINGS ON THE ZETA CARTEL STRUCTURE AND OPERATIONS ......................... 13 A. Hierarchy and Organization. .................................................. 13 B. Most Important Zeta Members Based on Testimonies .............................
[Show full text]
Listado Canales Virtuales
LISTADO CANALES VIRTUALES Nacionales 1 Canal Virtual 1 (Azteca 13) No. POBLACIÓN ESTADO CONCESIONARIO / PERMISIONARIO DISTINTIVO CANAL VIRTUAL 1 AGUASCALIENTES AGUASCALIENTES XHJCM-TDT 1.1 2 ENSENADA XHENE-TDT 1.1 BAJA CALIFORNIA 3 SAN FELIPE XHFEC-TDT 1.1 4 CD. CONSTITUCIÓN XHCOC-TDT 1.1 5 LA PAZ BAJA CALIFORNIA SUR XHAPB-TDT 1.1 6 SAN JOSÉ DEL CABO XHJCC-TDT 1.1 7 CAMPECHE XHGE-TDT 1.1 8 CD. DEL CARMEN CAMPECHE XHGN-TDT 1.1 9 ESCÁRCEGA XHPEH-TDT 1.1 10 ARRIAGA XHOMC-TDT 1.1 11 COMITÁN DE DOMÍNGUEZ XHDZ-TDT 1.1 CHIAPAS 12 SAN CRISTÓBAL DE LAS CASAS XHAO-TDT 1.1 13 TAPACHULA XHTAP-TDT 1.1 14 CD. JIMÉNEZ XHJCH-TDT 1.1 15 CHIHUAHUA XHCH-TDT 1.1 16 CHIHUAHUA XHIT-TDT 1.1 CHIHUAHUA 17 HIDALGO DEL PARRAL XHHPC-TDT 1.1 18 NUEVO CASAS GRANDES XHCGC-TDT 1.1 19 OJINAGA XHHR-TDT 1.1 20 MÉXICO CIUDAD DE MÉXICO XHDF-TDT 1.1 21 CD. ACUÑA XHHE-TDT 1.1 22 MONCLOVA XHHC-TDT 1.1 23 PARRAS DE LA FUENTE COAHUILA XHPFC-TDT 1.1 24 SABINAS XHCJ-TDT 1.1 25 TORREÓN XHGDP-TDT 1.1 26 COLIMA XHKF-TDT 1.1 27 MANZANILLO COLIMA XHDR-TDT 1.1 28 TECOMÁN XHTCA-TDT 1.1 29 CUENCAMÉ XHVEL-TDT 1.1 30 DURANGO XHDB-TDT 1.1 DURANGO 31 GUADALUPE VICTORIA XHGVH-TDT 1.1 32 SANTIAGO PAPASQUIARO TELEVISIÓN AZTECA, S.A. DE C.V. XHPAP-TDT 1.1 33 CELAYA GUANAJUATO XHMAS-TDT 1.1 34 ACAPULCO XHIE-TDT 1.1 35 CHILPANCINGO XHCER-TDT 1.1 36 IGUALA GUERRERO XHIR-TDT 1.1 37 TAXCO DE ALARCÓN XHIB-TDT 1.1 38 ZIHUATANEJO XHDU-TDT 1.1 39 TULANCINGO HIDALGO XHTGN-TDT 1.1 40 GUADALAJARA XHJAL-TDT 1.1 JALISCO 41 PUERTO VALLARTA XHGJ-TDT 1.1 42 JOCOTITLÁN MÉXICO XHXEM-TDT 1.1 43 LÁZARO CÁRDENAS XHLCM-TDT
[Show full text]
Two Reasons Why Laredo Has Less Homicides Than Nuevo Laredo by Steven Dudley
Two Reasons Why Laredo Has Less Homicides than Nuevo Laredo By Steven Dudley So-called spillover violence has long been a concern of residents of U.S. communities along the Southwest border, yet spikes in violent crime along the Mexican side of the border rarely impact rates of violence in the United States. InSight Crime’s Steven Dudley exams the forces behind these statistics in Nuevo Laredo and Laredo. Laredo and Nuevo Laredo, sister cities along the US-Mexico border, are almost the same size. They have very similar economic motors, cultural heritage, populations and socio-economic indicators. Yet, in 2012, Nuevo Laredo had at least 36 times the number of murders. Why? It is a question that is pondered up and down this 1,951-mile border, especially after the explosions of violence in Tijuana and Juarez during the last decade, places that sit across from San Diego and El Paso respectively, two of the safest cities in the United States. Like those cities, murder rates have traditionally been higher in Nuevo Laredo by a factor of three to five. And few places offer such similarities in what is essentially an isolated geographic space. Table 1 Comparisons between both cities Nuevo Laredo Laredo Population 384,000 236,000 % “single-mother homes” 24 21 % finish high school 36 55 % speak Spanish at home Not Given 91 Persons per household 3.8 3.7 Homicides (2012) 288 8 Sources: INEGI, Secretario Ejecutivo del Sistema Nacional de Seguridad Pública, US Census Bureau 1 Last year was the worst on record in Nuevo Laredo with 288 homicides.
[Show full text]
Anexo VII. Infraestructura De Estaciones De TDT. "Estudio De Cobertura De Los Servicios De Radiodifusión En México"
Anexo VII. Infraestructura de estaciones de TDT. "Estudio de cobertura de los servicios de radiodifusión en México" INFRAESTRUCTURA DE ESTACIONES DE TELEVISIÓN No ESTADO POBLACIÓN PRINCIPAL A SERVIR DISTINTIVO SERVICIO CANAL TIPO DE USO 1 AGS AGUASCALIENTES XHAG TDT 35 COMERCIAL 2 AGS AGUASCALIENTES XHAGU TDT 32 COMERCIAL 3 AGS AGUASCALIENTES XHCGA TDT 26 PUBLICO 4 AGS AGUASCALIENTES, LAGOS DE MORENO, NOCHISTLAN, LEÓN. XHCTAG TDT 18 COMERCIAL 5 AGS AGUASCALIENTES XHJCM TDT 30 COMERCIAL 6 AGS AGUASCALIENTES XHLGA TDT 29 COMERCIAL 7 AGS AGUASCALIENTES XHSPRAG TDT 47 PUBLICO 8 AGS CALVILLO XHCVO TDT 38 COMERCIAL 9 BC ENSENADA XHEBC TDT 26 COMERCIAL 10 BC ENSENADA XHENE TDT 16 COMERCIAL 11 BC ENSENADA XHENJ TDT 17 COMERCIAL 12 BC ENSENADA XHENT TDT 20 COMERCIAL 13 BC ENSENADA XHS TDT 23 COMERCIAL 14 BC ISLA DE CEDROS XHIDC TDT 23 COMERCIAL 15 BC MEXICALI XHAQ TDT 28 COMERCIAL 16 BC MEXICALI XHBC TDT 14 COMERCIAL 17 BC MEXICALI XHBM TDT 34 COMERCIAL 18 BC MEXICALI, SAN LUIS RIO COLORADO XHCTME TDT 17 COMERCIAL 19 BC MEXICALI XHEXT TDT 25 COMERCIAL 20 BC MEXICALI XHILA TDT 46 COMERCIAL 21 BC MEXICALI XHMEE TDT 15 COMERCIAL 22 BC MEXICALI XHMEX TDT 18 COMERCIAL 23 BC SAN FELIPE XHFEC TDT 21 COMERCIAL 24 BC TECATE XHDTV TDT 47 COMERCIAL 25 BC TIJUANA XETV TDT 23 COMERCIAL 26 BC TIJUANA XEWT TDT 32 COMERCIAL 27 BC TIJUANA XHAS TDT 34 COMERCIAL 28 BC TIJUANA XHBJ TDT 44 COMERCIAL 29 BC TIJUANA Y TECATE, BC XHCTTI TDT 33 COMERCIAL 30 BC TIJUANA XHJK TDT 28 COMERCIAL 31 BC TIJUANA XHTIT TDT 29 COMERCIAL 32 BC TIJUANA XHTJB TDT 15 PUBLICO 33 BC TIJUANA XHUAA TDT 22 COMERCIAL 34 BCS BAHÍA ASUNCION XHBAB TDT 27 COMERCIAL 35 BCS BAHÍA DE TORTUGAS XHBTB TDT 21 COMERCIAL 36 BCS CABO SAN LUCAS Y SAN JOSÉ DEL CABO XHCPCS TDT 35 COMERCIAL 37 BCS CD.
[Show full text]
Annual Report 2005 Engjuly13final.Pub
INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION UNITED STATES AND MEXICO AERIAL VIEW OF ANZALDUAS DIVERSION DAM IN THE LOWER RIO GRANDE 2005 ANNUAL REPORT INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION UNITED STATES AND MEXICO “The jurisdiction of the Commission shall extend to the limitrophe parts of the Rio Grande (Rio Bravo) and the Colorado River, to the land boundary between the two countries, and to works located upon their common boundary, each Section of the Commission retaining jurisdiction over that part of the works located within the limits of its own country.” Article 2, 1944 Water Treaty M E S S A G E F R O M T H E C O M M I S S I O N E R S During 2005, the International Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico (IBWC) carried out various activities related to boundary demarcation, maintenance of the channels of the interna- tional rivers, control and use of the international waters, and monitoring of the quantity and quality of these waters. These activities were under- taken in conformance with the terms of the boundary and water trea- ties agreed to by the Governments of the United States and Mexico. Ap- plication of these treaties is the responsibility of the IBWC. During the year, U.S. President George W. Bush designated long- time Commission employee Carlos Marin as Acting Commissioner fol- lowing the resignation of Arturo Q. Duran. The Mexican Section contin- ued to operate under the leadership of longtime Commissioner Arturo Herrera Solis. The major Commission accomplishment for the year was the resolution of Mexico's deficit in Rio Grande water deliveries to the United States.
[Show full text]
Key Officers List (UNCLASSIFIED)
United States Department of State Telephone Directory This customized report includes the following section(s): Key Officers List (UNCLASSIFIED) 9/13/2021 Provided by Global Information Services, A/GIS Cover UNCLASSIFIED Key Officers of Foreign Service Posts Afghanistan FMO Inna Rotenberg ICASS Chair CDR David Millner IMO Cem Asci KABUL (E) Great Massoud Road, (VoIP, US-based) 301-490-1042, Fax No working Fax, INMARSAT Tel 011-873-761-837-725, ISO Aaron Smith Workweek: Saturday - Thursday 0800-1630, Website: https://af.usembassy.gov/ Algeria Officer Name DCM OMS Melisa Woolfolk ALGIERS (E) 5, Chemin Cheikh Bachir Ibrahimi, +213 (770) 08- ALT DIR Tina Dooley-Jones 2000, Fax +213 (23) 47-1781, Workweek: Sun - Thurs 08:00-17:00, CM OMS Bonnie Anglov Website: https://dz.usembassy.gov/ Co-CLO Lilliana Gonzalez Officer Name FM Michael Itinger DCM OMS Allie Hutton HRO Geoff Nyhart FCS Michele Smith INL Patrick Tanimura FM David Treleaven LEGAT James Bolden HRO TDY Ellen Langston MGT Ben Dille MGT Kristin Rockwood POL/ECON Richard Reiter MLO/ODC Andrew Bergman SDO/DATT COL Erik Bauer POL/ECON Roselyn Ramos TREAS Julie Malec SDO/DATT Christopher D'Amico AMB Chargé Ross L Wilson AMB Chargé Gautam Rana CG Ben Ousley Naseman CON Jeffrey Gringer DCM Ian McCary DCM Acting DCM Eric Barbee PAO Daniel Mattern PAO Eric Barbee GSO GSO William Hunt GSO TDY Neil Richter RSO Fernando Matus RSO Gregg Geerdes CLO Christine Peterson AGR Justina Torry DEA Edward (Joe) Kipp CLO Ikram McRiffey FMO Maureen Danzot FMO Aamer Khan IMO Jaime Scarpatti ICASS Chair Jeffrey Gringer IMO Daniel Sweet Albania Angola TIRANA (E) Rruga Stavro Vinjau 14, +355-4-224-7285, Fax +355-4- 223-2222, Workweek: Monday-Friday, 8:00am-4:30 pm.
[Show full text]
The Streets of Laredo: Reevaluating the Vernacular Urbanism of Old Nuevo Santander
85THACSA ANNUAL MEETING ANDTECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE 34 1 The Streets of Laredo: Reevaluating the Vernacular Urbanism of Old Nuevo Santander RAFAEL LONGORIA University of Houston STEPHEN FOX Anchorage Foundation of Texas As part of the last Spanish colonization effort in the New area with the highest percentage of Mexican-American World, don Jose de Escandon, Conde de la Sierra Gorda, residents. coordinated settlement of the Mexican province of Nuevo Between 1749 and 1755 Escandon established twenty Santander, which comprised the present Mexican state of towns in the province of Nuevo Santander.' These included Tamaulipas and most of the U.S. state of Texas south of the a string of villages along the Rio Grande, the far north edge Nueces River. Of the towns Escandon established in Nuevo of settlement: Camargo (1749), Reynosa (1749), Revilla Santander in the middle of the 18th century, the five located (1750, now called Guerrero Viejo), Mier (1 752), and Laredo near the Rio Grande (Rio Bravo del Norte) ended up on either (1755). In the earliest years of Nuevo Santander, property side of the international border between Mexico and the was held communally by the residents in each settlement. In United States. One of these, Laredo, Texas, is now in the 1767 a royal commission surveyed town sites and pasturage United States. Laredo is defined by its Mexican Creole allotments and distributed titles to private property among architecture and urban spatiality. Architecture materially settlers. Along the Rio Grande, each household received a represents community identity in this, the U.S. metropolitan town lot on which to build a house and a porcidn, a long, narrow, 5,300-acre tract of land with river frontage, on which to raise livestock.
[Show full text]
Del Rio Acuña Nuevo Laredo Laredo Eagle Pass Piedras Negras
Del Rio Acuña Eagle Pass Piedras Negras Laredo Nuevo Laredo APPENDIX A POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE & TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP CHARTER AND ANNEX I LAREDO – COAHUILA/NUEVO LEON/TAMAULIPAS BORDER MASTER PLAN Policy Advisory Committee and Technical Working Group Charter PREAMBLE The participating United States and Mexican government agencies, as well as rail stakeholders whose objectives include border transportation infrastructure planning, programming, construction and/or management: Recognize the bilateral nature of border transportation issues and that the latter can be most effectively addressed jointly; Reaffirm that international trade is dependent upon well-coordinated transportation planning processes along the border; Acknowledge that the United States (U.S.) and Mexican border region transportation assets are experiencing congestion issues that must be addressed to avoid adverse trade and environmental impacts; and Convinced of the need to better coordinate planning at the federal, state, regional, and local level to improve transportation infrastructure in the border region of their respective countries, including at formal ports of entry (POEs) and the transportation infrastructure serving formal POEs, Hereby wish to create the Laredo – Coahuila/Nuevo Leon/Tamaulipas Border Master Plan’s Policy Advisory Committee and Technical Working Group as follows: SECTION 1: PURPOSE Under the direction of the U.S. / Mexico Joint Working Committee, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) hereby announces the establishment of the Laredo – Coahuila/Nuevo Leon/Tamaulipas Border Master Plan Policy Advisory Committee and Technical Working Group. The government agencies and rail stakeholders will participate in the development of a Border Master Plan – a comprehensive approach for coordinating planning and delivery of POE and transportation infrastructure projects serving POEs under the jurisdiction of TxDOT’s Laredo District and the correspondent Mexican States.
[Show full text]
Del Rio Acuña Nuevo Laredo Laredo Eagle Pass Piedras Negras
Del Rio Acuña Eagle Pass Piedras Negras Laredo Nuevo Laredo Laredo-Coahuila/Nuevo León/Tamaulipas Border Master Plan Executive Summary Introduction Border Master Plans, as defined and supported by the U.S./Mexico Joint Working Committee on Transportation Planning and Programming, the Federal Highway Administration, and the U.S. Department of State, are comprehensive long range plans to inventory transportation and port of entry (POE) infrastructure that facilitate trade, and prioritize planned transportation and POE projects within a defined study area. The Border Master Plans represent binational stakeholder efforts to (i) prioritize and promote POE and related transportation projects; (ii) inform decision-making; (iii) allocate limited funding sources, and (iv) ensure continued dialogue and coordination on future POE and supporting transportation infrastructure needs and projects. The Laredo-Coahuila/Nuevo León/Tamaulipas Border Master Plan (Border Master Plan) is the second Border Master Plan that on the U.S.-Mexico border and followed a similar approach as the California-Baja California Border Master Plan. The objectives of the Laredo-Coahuila/Nuevo León/Tamaulipas Border Master Plan were to: design a stakeholder agency involvement process that is inclusive and ensure the participation of all involved in POE projects and the transportation infrastructure serving those POEs; increase the understanding of the POE and transportation planning processes on both sides of the border; develop and implement a plan for prioritizing and promoting POE and related transportation projects, including evaluation criteria and rankings over the short, medium and long term; and establish a process to ensure continued dialogue among federal, state, regional, and local stakeholder agencies in Texas and Mexico to ensure continued coordination on current and future POE and supporting transportation infrastructure needs and projects.
[Show full text]
Centros De Atención a Clientes Telcel
Directorio de Centros de Atención a Clientes (CAC) de Telcel en Tamaulipas ÁREA DE ESPERA POSICIÓN DE ATENCIÓN A SEÑALIZACIÓN ACCESO CON ANIMALES RESERVADA PARA REGIÓN NOMBRE DEL CAC HORARIO Domicilio: Calle Domicilio: No. Exterior Domicilio: No. Interior Domicilio: Colonia Domicilio: Código Postal Domicilio: Municipio Domicilio: Entidad KIOSKO CAJERO ATM RAMPA RUTA ACCESIBLE MENOR ALTURA ACCESIBILIDAD GUIA PERSONAS CON DISCAPACIDAD 4 TAMPICO I LUNES A DOMINGO 09:00 A 21:00 HRS. AV. EJERCITO MEXICANO 103 LOCAL 4 ESFUERZO NACIONAL 89470 CIUDAD MADERO TAMAULIPAS X X X X X X 4 MANTE LUNES A DOMINGO 9:00 A 20:00 HRS. VICENTE GUERRERO 9000 B ZONA CENTRO 89800 EL MANTE TAMAULIPAS X X X X X X 4 MATAMOROS LUNES A DOMINGO 9:00 A 20:00 HRS. SEXTA Y MINA 11 CENTRO 87300 MATAMOROS TAMAULIPAS X X X 4 MATAMOROS II LUNES A DOMINGO 10:00 A 21:00 HRS. AV. PEDRO CARDENAS 1901 FRACC. VICTORIA 87390 MATAMOROS TAMAULIPAS X X X X 4 LAREDO I LUNES A VIERNES 09:00 A 19:00 HRS. HEROE DE NACATAZ 2335 FRACC. OJO CALIENTE 88000 NUEVO LAREDO TAMAULIPAS X X X X 4 LAREDO II LUNES A DOMINGO DE 10:00 A 21:00 HRS. AVE REFORMA 5601 SUB. ANCLA D-1 LOCAL 84-87 LAS ALAMEDAS 88297 NUEVO LAREDO TAMAULIPAS X X X X 4 REYNOSA I LUNES A DOMINGO 08:00 A 19:00 HRS. PEDRO J MENDEZ 140 LOCAL 1 A 8 CENTRO 88500 REYNOSA TAMAULIPAS X X X X X X 4 REYNOSA II LUNES A DOMINGO 09:00 A 20:00 HRS.
[Show full text]