DOCSLIB.ORG

Anexo VII. Infraestructura De Estaciones De TDT. "Estudio De Cobertura De Los Servicios De Radiodifusión En México"

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Anexo VII. Infraestructura De Estaciones De TDT. Anexo VII. Infraestructura de estaciones de TDT. "Estudio de cobertura de los servicios de radiodifusión en México" INFRAESTRUCTURA DE ESTACIONES DE TELEVISIÓN No ESTADO POBLACIÓN PRINCIPAL A SERVIR DISTINTIVO SERVICIO CANAL TIPO DE USO 1 AGS AGUASCALIENTES XHAG TDT 35 COMERCIAL 2 AGS AGUASCALIENTES XHAGU TDT 32 COMERCIAL 3 AGS AGUASCALIENTES XHCGA TDT 26 PUBLICO 4 AGS AGUASCALIENTES, LAGOS DE MORENO, NOCHISTLAN, LEÓN. XHCTAG TDT 18 COMERCIAL 5 AGS AGUASCALIENTES XHJCM TDT 30 COMERCIAL 6 AGS AGUASCALIENTES XHLGA TDT 29 COMERCIAL 7 AGS AGUASCALIENTES XHSPRAG TDT 47 PUBLICO 8 AGS CALVILLO XHCVO TDT 38 COMERCIAL 9 BC ENSENADA XHEBC TDT 26 COMERCIAL 10 BC ENSENADA XHENE TDT 16 COMERCIAL 11 BC ENSENADA XHENJ TDT 17 COMERCIAL 12 BC ENSENADA XHENT TDT 20 COMERCIAL 13 BC ENSENADA XHS TDT 23 COMERCIAL 14 BC ISLA DE CEDROS XHIDC TDT 23 COMERCIAL 15 BC MEXICALI XHAQ TDT 28 COMERCIAL 16 BC MEXICALI XHBC TDT 14 COMERCIAL 17 BC MEXICALI XHBM TDT 34 COMERCIAL 18 BC MEXICALI, SAN LUIS RIO COLORADO XHCTME TDT 17 COMERCIAL 19 BC MEXICALI XHEXT TDT 25 COMERCIAL 20 BC MEXICALI XHILA TDT 46 COMERCIAL 21 BC MEXICALI XHMEE TDT 15 COMERCIAL 22 BC MEXICALI XHMEX TDT 18 COMERCIAL 23 BC SAN FELIPE XHFEC TDT 21 COMERCIAL 24 BC TECATE XHDTV TDT 47 COMERCIAL 25 BC TIJUANA XETV TDT 23 COMERCIAL 26 BC TIJUANA XEWT TDT 32 COMERCIAL 27 BC TIJUANA XHAS TDT 34 COMERCIAL 28 BC TIJUANA XHBJ TDT 44 COMERCIAL 29 BC TIJUANA Y TECATE, BC XHCTTI TDT 33 COMERCIAL 30 BC TIJUANA XHJK TDT 28 COMERCIAL 31 BC TIJUANA XHTIT TDT 29 COMERCIAL 32 BC TIJUANA XHTJB TDT 15 PUBLICO 33 BC TIJUANA XHUAA TDT 22 COMERCIAL 34 BCS BAHÍA ASUNCION XHBAB TDT 27 COMERCIAL 35 BCS BAHÍA DE TORTUGAS XHBTB TDT 21 COMERCIAL 36 BCS CABO SAN LUCAS Y SAN JOSÉ DEL CABO XHCPCS TDT 35 COMERCIAL 37 BCS CD. CONSTITUCIÓN XHCBC TDT 30 COMERCIAL 38 BCS CD. CONSTITUCIÓN XHCCB TDT 26 COMERCIAL 39 BCS CD. CONSTITUCIÓN XHCOC TDT 27 COMERCIAL 40 BCS GUERRERO NEGRO XHGNB TDT 24 COMERCIAL 41 BCS GUERRERO NEGRO XHGWT TDT 26 COMERCIAL 42 BCS LA PAZ XHAPB TDT 21 COMERCIAL 43 BCS LA PAZ XHBZC TDT 30 PUBLICO 44 BCS LA PAZ XHCPBC TDT 23 COMERCIAL 45 BCS LA PAZ XHLPB TDT 29 COMERCIAL 46 BCS LA PAZ XHLPT TDT 28 COMERCIAL 47 BCS LA PAZ XHPBC TDT 25 COMERCIAL 48 BCS SAN IGNACIO XHSIB TDT 22 COMERCIAL 49 BCS SAN ISIDRO XHSIS TDT 21 COMERCIAL 50 BCS SAN JOSÉ DEL CABO XHJCC TDT 24 COMERCIAL 51 BCS SAN JOSÉ DEL CABO XHSJC TDT 26 COMERCIAL 52 BCS SAN JOSÉ DEL CABO XHSJT TDT 27 COMERCIAL 53 BCS SANTA ROSALIA XHSRB TDT 24 COMERCIAL 54 CAMP CAMPECHE XHAN TDT 49 COMERCIAL 55 CAMP CAMPECHE XHCAM TDT 24 COMERCIAL 56 CAMP CAMPECHE XHCCA TDT 30 PUBLICO 57 CAMP CAMPECHE XHCPA TDT 34 COMERCIAL 58 CAMP CAMPECHE Y CHAMPOTÓN XHCTCA TDT 20 COMERCIAL 59 CAMP CAMPECHE XHGE TDT 29 COMERCIAL 60 CAMP CAMPECHE XHSPRCC TDT 32 PUBLICO 61 CAMP CAMPECHE Y CHAMPOTÓN XHTMCA TDT 27 COMERCIAL 62 CAMP CD. DEL CARMEN XHCCT TDT 31 COMERCIAL 1/13 Anexo VII. Infraestructura de estaciones de TDT. "Estudio de cobertura de los servicios de radiodifusión en México" INFRAESTRUCTURA DE ESTACIONES DE TELEVISIÓN No ESTADO POBLACIÓN PRINCIPAL A SERVIR DISTINTIVO SERVICIO CANAL TIPO DE USO 63 CAMP CD. DEL CARMEN XHCDC TDT 39 COMERCIAL 64 CAMP CD. DEL CARMEN XHGN TDT 35 COMERCIAL 65 CAMP CD. DEL CARMEN XHTMCC TDT 25 COMERCIAL 66 CAMP ESCARCEGA XHECA TDT 27 COMERCIAL 67 CAMP ESCARCEGA XHEFT TDT 21 COMERCIAL 68 CAMP ESCARCEGA XHPEH TDT 29 COMERCIAL 69 CDMX CD. DE MÉXICO XEIMT TDT 23 COMERCIAL 70 CDMX CD. DE MÉXICO XEIPN TDT 33 PUBLICO 71 CDMX CD. DE MÉXICO XEQ TDT 22 COMERCIAL 72 CDMX CD. DE MÉXICO XEW TDT 32 COMERCIAL 73 CDMX CD. DE MÉXICO XHCDM TDT 21 PUBLICO 74 CDMX CD. DE MÉXICO Y ÁREA METROPOLITANA XHCTMX TDT 29 COMERCIAL 75 CDMX CD. DE MÉXICO XHDF TDT 25 COMERCIAL 76 CDMX CD. DE MÉXICO XHGC TDT 31 COMERCIAL 77 CDMX CD. DE MÉXICO XHHCU TDT 18 PUBLICO 78 CDMX CD. DE MÉXICO XHIMT TDT 24 COMERCIAL 79 CDMX CD. DE MÉXICO XHSPR TDT 30 PUBLICO 80 CDMX CD. DE MÉXICO XHTRES TDT 27 COMERCIAL 81 CDMX CD. DE MÉXICO XHTV TDT 49 COMERCIAL 82 CDMX CD. DE MÉXICO XHTVM TDT 26 COMERCIAL 83 CDMX CD. DE MÉXICO XHUNAM TDT 20 PUBLICO 84 CDMX CD. DE MÉXICO Y ÁREA METROPOLITANA XHTDMX TDT 11 COMERCIAL CD. DE MÉXICO Y ÁREA METROPOLITANA (COACALCO, EJIDOS 85 CDMX XHFAMX TDT 28 COMERCIAL DE HUIPULCO) 86 CHIH CD. CAMARGO XHCGJ TDT 21 COMERCIAL 87 CHIH CD. CAMARGO XHCHC TDT 36 COMERCIAL 88 CHIH CD. CUAUHTÉMOC XHCCH TDT 36 COMERCIAL 89 CHIH CD. CUAUHTÉMOC XHCHU TDT 20 PUBLICO 90 CHIH CD. CUAUHTÉMOC XHCTH TDT 33 SOCIAL 91 CHIH CD. DELICIAS XHCDE TDT 19 COMERCIAL 92 CHIH CD. DELICIAS XHCHD TDT 20 PUBLICO 93 CHIH CD. DELICIAS XHDEH TDT 33 COMERCIAL 94 CHIH CD. JIMÉNEZ XHBU TDT 33 COMERCIAL 95 CHIH CD. JIMÉNEZ XHJCH TDT 24 COMERCIAL 96 CHIH CD. JUÁREZ XEJ TDT 50 COMERCIAL 97 CHIH CD. JUÁREZ XEPM TDT 29 COMERCIAL 98 CHIH CD. JUÁREZ XHCJE TDT 34 COMERCIAL 99 CHIH CD. JUÁREZ XHCJH TDT 36 COMERCIAL 100 CHIH CD. JUÁREZ XHCTCJ TDT 31 COMERCIAL 101 CHIH CD. JUÁREZ XHIJ TDT 45 COMERCIAL 102 CHIH CD. JUÁREZ XHJCI TDT 30 COMERCIAL 103 CHIH CD. JUÁREZ XHJUB TDT 33 COMERCIAL 104 CHIH CD. JUÁREZ XHMTCH TDT 28 COMERCIAL 105 CHIH CD. MADERA XHMAC TDT 29 COMERCIAL 106 CHIH CHIHUAHUA XHABC TDT 34 SOCIAL 107 CHIH CHIHUAHUA XHAUC TDT 32 COMERCIAL 108 CHIH CHIHUAHUA XHCH TDT 22 COMERCIAL 109 CHIH CHIHUAHUA XHCHI TDT 25 PUBLICO 110 CHIH CHIHUAHUA XHCHZ TDT 24 COMERCIAL 111 CHIH CHIHUAHUA Y CD. DELICIAS XHCTCH TDT 29 COMERCIAL 112 CHIH CHIHUAHUA XHECH TDT 21 COMERCIAL 113 CHIH CHIHUAHUA XHFI TDT 26 COMERCIAL 114 CHIH CHIHUAHUA XHIT TDT 23 COMERCIAL 115 CHIH CHIHUAHUA Y CD. DELICIAS XHICCH TDT 30 COMERCIAL 116 CHIH HIDALGO DEL PARRAL XHHDP TDT 22 COMERCIAL 117 CHIH HIDALGO DEL PARRAL XHHPC TDT 25 COMERCIAL 118 CHIH HIDALGO DEL PARRAL XHHPT TDT 26 COMERCIAL 119 CHIH HIDALGO DEL PARRAL XHMH TDT 30 COMERCIAL 120 CHIH NUEVO CASAS GRANDES XHCGC TDT 24 COMERCIAL 121 CHIH NUEVO CASAS GRANDES XHNCG TDT 27 COMERCIAL 122 CHIH OJINAGA XHHR TDT 16 COMERCIAL 123 CHIH OJINAGA XHOCH TDT 15 COMERCIAL 124 CHIH SAN BUENAVENTURA XHBVT TDT 35 COMERCIAL 2/13 Anexo VII. Infraestructura de estaciones de TDT. "Estudio de cobertura de los servicios de radiodifusión en México" INFRAESTRUCTURA DE ESTACIONES DE TELEVISIÓN No ESTADO POBLACIÓN PRINCIPAL A SERVIR DISTINTIVO SERVICIO CANAL TIPO DE USO 125 CHIH SANTA BARBARA XHSAC TDT 34 COMERCIAL 126 CHIS ARRIAGA XHOMC TDT 27 COMERCIAL 127 CHIS ARRIAGA - TONALÁ XHWVT TDT 32 COMERCIAL 128 CHIS CINTALAPA DE FIGUEROA XHCIC TDT 34 COMERCIAL 129 CHIS COMITÁN DE DOMÍNGUEZ XHCMZ TDT 23 COMERCIAL 130 CHIS COMITÁN DE DOMÍNGUEZ XHCOM TDT 30 COMERCIAL 131 CHIS COMITÁN DE DOMÍNGUEZ XHCZC TDT 43 COMERCIAL 132 CHIS COMITÁN DE DOMÍNGUEZ XHDZ TDT 35 COMERCIAL 133 CHIS COMITÁN DE DOMÍNGUEZ XHITC TDT 34 PUBLICO 134 CHIS HUIXTLA XHHUC TDT 32 COMERCIAL 135 CHIS MOTOZINTLA XHMCH TDT 25 COMERCIAL 136 CHIS OCOSINGO XHOCC TDT 38 COMERCIAL 137 CHIS SAN CRISTOBAL DE LAS CASAS XHAO TDT 42 COMERCIAL 138 CHIS SAN CRISTOBAL DE LAS CASAS XHCSA TDT 39 COMERCIAL 139 CHIS SAN CRISTOBAL DE LAS CASAS XHDY TDT 36 COMERCIAL 140 CHIS SAN CRISTOBAL DE LAS CASAS XHSBB TDT 48 PUBLICO 141 CHIS SAN CRISTOBAL DE LAS CASAS XHSCC TDT 16 COMERCIAL 142 CHIS SAN CRISTOBAL DE LAS CASAS XHSNC TDT 17 COMERCIAL 143 CHIS SAN CRISTOBAL DE LAS CASAS XHSPRSC TDT 51 PUBLICO 144 CHIS TAPACHULA XHAA TDT 43 COMERCIAL 145 CHIS TAPACHULA, HUEHUETAN Y MOTOZINTLA XHCTTH TDT 29 COMERCIAL 146 CHIS TAPACHULA XHGK TDT 28 COMERCIAL 147 CHIS TAPACHULA XHJU TDT 36 COMERCIAL 148 CHIS TAPACHULA XHSPRTP TDT 42 PUBLICO 149 CHIS TAPACHULA XHTAA TDT 41 PUBLICO 150 CHIS TAPACHULA XHTAH TDT 46 COMERCIAL 151 CHIS TAPACHULA XHTAP TDT 30 COMERCIAL 152 CHIS TONALÁ XHTON TDT 30 COMERCIAL TUXTLA GUTIÉRREZ, SAN CRISTOBAL DE LAS CASAS, COMITÁN 153 CHIS XHCTCR TDT 27 COMERCIAL DE DOMÍNGUEZ Y OCOSINGO 154 CHIS TUXTLA GUTIÉRREZ XHOPTC TDT 31 PUBLICO 155 CHIS TUXTLA GUTIÉRREZ XHTTG TDT 44 PUBLICO 156 CHIS TUXTLA GUTIÉRREZ XHTUA TDT 29 COMERCIAL 157 CHIS TUXTLA GUTIÉRREZ XHTX TDT 24 COMERCIAL 158 CHIS VENUSTIANO CARRANZA XHVAC TDT 28 COMERCIAL 159 CHIS VILLA FLORES XHVFC TDT 26 COMERCIAL 160 COAH CD. ACUNA XHAMC TDT 34 COMERCIAL 161 COAH CD. ACUNA XHCAW TDT 36 COMERCIAL 162 COAH CD. ACUNA XHCHW TDT 27 COMERCIAL 163 COAH CD. ACUNA XHHE TDT 25 COMERCIAL 164 COAH CD. ALLENDE XHWDT TDT 35 COMERCIAL 165 COAH MONCLOVA XHHC TDT 24 COMERCIAL 166 COAH MONCLOVA XHMAP TDT 36 SOCIAL 167 COAH MONCLOVA XHMLA TDT 27 COMERCIAL 168 COAH MONCLOVA XHMLC TDT 29 COMERCIAL 169 COAH MONCLOVA XHMOT TDT 35 COMERCIAL 170 COAH MONCLOVA Y CASTANOS XHMTCO TDT 33 COMERCIAL 171 COAH NUEVA ROSITA XHNOH TDT 29 COMERCIAL 172 COAH NUEVA ROSITA XHRDC TDT 23 COMERCIAL 173 COAH PARRAS DE LA FUENTE XHPAC TDT 22 COMERCIAL 174 COAH PARRAS DE LA FUENTE XHPFC TDT 29 COMERCIAL 175 COAH PARRAS DE LA FUENTE XHPFE TDT 28 COMERCIAL 176 COAH PIEDRAS NEGRAS XHPN TDT 20 COMERCIAL 177 COAH PIEDRAS NEGRAS XHPNG TDT 32 COMERCIAL 178 COAH PIEDRAS NEGRAS XHPNH TDT 31 COMERCIAL 179 COAH PIEDRAS NEGRAS XHPNT TDT 30 COMERCIAL 180 COAH PIEDRAS NEGRAS XHPNW TDT 33 COMERCIAL 181 COAH SABINAS XHSDD TDT 21 COMERCIAL 182 COAH SABINAS - NUEVA ROSITA XHCJ TDT 26 COMERCIAL 183 COAH SABINAS - NUEVA ROSITA XHSBC TDT 34 COMERCIAL 184 COAH SALTILLO XHAE TDT 24 COMERCIAL 185 COAH SALTILLO XHCTSA TDT 26 COMERCIAL 186 COAH SALTILLO XHLLO TDT 33 COMERCIAL 3/13 Anexo VII.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “Control...Over the Entire State of Coahuila” an Analysis of Testimonies in Trials Against Zeta Members in San Antonio, Austin, and Del Rio, Texas
    “Control...Over the Entire State of Coahuila” An analysis of testimonies in trials against Zeta members in San Antonio, Austin, and Del Rio, Texas NOVEMBER 2017 This report does not represent the official position of the School of Law or the University of Texas, and the views presented here reflect only the opinions of the individual authors and of the Human Rights Clinic 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................ 3 2. INTRODUCTION .................................................................. 5 A. Project Description And Purpose ............................................... 5 B. The Trials ................................................................... 6 I. The San Antonio Trial..................................................... 6 II. The Austin Trials ......................................................... 7 III. The Del Rio Trial ......................................................... 9 C. Background Information ...................................................... 9 I. Mexico’s Security Strategy ................................................. 9 II. Coahuila, Mexico ......................................................... 10 III. Brief History of the Zeta Cartel ............................................. 11 3. FINDINGS ON THE ZETA CARTEL STRUCTURE AND OPERATIONS ......................... 13 A. Hierarchy and Organization. .................................................. 13 B. Most Important Zeta Members Based on Testimonies .............................
    [Show full text]
  • Listado Canales Virtuales
    LISTADO CANALES VIRTUALES Nacionales 1 Canal Virtual 1 (Azteca 13) No. POBLACIÓN ESTADO CONCESIONARIO / PERMISIONARIO DISTINTIVO CANAL VIRTUAL 1 AGUASCALIENTES AGUASCALIENTES XHJCM-TDT 1.1 2 ENSENADA XHENE-TDT 1.1 BAJA CALIFORNIA 3 SAN FELIPE XHFEC-TDT 1.1 4 CD. CONSTITUCIÓN XHCOC-TDT 1.1 5 LA PAZ BAJA CALIFORNIA SUR XHAPB-TDT 1.1 6 SAN JOSÉ DEL CABO XHJCC-TDT 1.1 7 CAMPECHE XHGE-TDT 1.1 8 CD. DEL CARMEN CAMPECHE XHGN-TDT 1.1 9 ESCÁRCEGA XHPEH-TDT 1.1 10 ARRIAGA XHOMC-TDT 1.1 11 COMITÁN DE DOMÍNGUEZ XHDZ-TDT 1.1 CHIAPAS 12 SAN CRISTÓBAL DE LAS CASAS XHAO-TDT 1.1 13 TAPACHULA XHTAP-TDT 1.1 14 CD. JIMÉNEZ XHJCH-TDT 1.1 15 CHIHUAHUA XHCH-TDT 1.1 16 CHIHUAHUA XHIT-TDT 1.1 CHIHUAHUA 17 HIDALGO DEL PARRAL XHHPC-TDT 1.1 18 NUEVO CASAS GRANDES XHCGC-TDT 1.1 19 OJINAGA XHHR-TDT 1.1 20 MÉXICO CIUDAD DE MÉXICO XHDF-TDT 1.1 21 CD. ACUÑA XHHE-TDT 1.1 22 MONCLOVA XHHC-TDT 1.1 23 PARRAS DE LA FUENTE COAHUILA XHPFC-TDT 1.1 24 SABINAS XHCJ-TDT 1.1 25 TORREÓN XHGDP-TDT 1.1 26 COLIMA XHKF-TDT 1.1 27 MANZANILLO COLIMA XHDR-TDT 1.1 28 TECOMÁN XHTCA-TDT 1.1 29 CUENCAMÉ XHVEL-TDT 1.1 30 DURANGO XHDB-TDT 1.1 DURANGO 31 GUADALUPE VICTORIA XHGVH-TDT 1.1 32 SANTIAGO PAPASQUIARO TELEVISIÓN AZTECA, S.A. DE C.V. XHPAP-TDT 1.1 33 CELAYA GUANAJUATO XHMAS-TDT 1.1 34 ACAPULCO XHIE-TDT 1.1 35 CHILPANCINGO XHCER-TDT 1.1 36 IGUALA GUERRERO XHIR-TDT 1.1 37 TAXCO DE ALARCÓN XHIB-TDT 1.1 38 ZIHUATANEJO XHDU-TDT 1.1 39 TULANCINGO HIDALGO XHTGN-TDT 1.1 40 GUADALAJARA XHJAL-TDT 1.1 JALISCO 41 PUERTO VALLARTA XHGJ-TDT 1.1 42 JOCOTITLÁN MÉXICO XHXEM-TDT 1.1 43 LÁZARO CÁRDENAS XHLCM-TDT
    [Show full text]
  • Two Reasons Why Laredo Has Less Homicides Than Nuevo Laredo by Steven Dudley
    Two Reasons Why Laredo Has Less Homicides than Nuevo Laredo By Steven Dudley So-called spillover violence has long been a concern of residents of U.S. communities along the Southwest border, yet spikes in violent crime along the Mexican side of the border rarely impact rates of violence in the United States. InSight Crime’s Steven Dudley exams the forces behind these statistics in Nuevo Laredo and Laredo. Laredo and Nuevo Laredo, sister cities along the US-Mexico border, are almost the same size. They have very similar economic motors, cultural heritage, populations and socio-economic indicators. Yet, in 2012, Nuevo Laredo had at least 36 times the number of murders. Why? It is a question that is pondered up and down this 1,951-mile border, especially after the explosions of violence in Tijuana and Juarez during the last decade, places that sit across from San Diego and El Paso respectively, two of the safest cities in the United States. Like those cities, murder rates have traditionally been higher in Nuevo Laredo by a factor of three to five. And few places offer such similarities in what is essentially an isolated geographic space. Table 1 Comparisons between both cities Nuevo Laredo Laredo Population 384,000 236,000 % “single-mother homes” 24 21 % finish high school 36 55 % speak Spanish at home Not Given 91 Persons per household 3.8 3.7 Homicides (2012) 288 8 Sources: INEGI, Secretario Ejecutivo del Sistema Nacional de Seguridad Pública, US Census Bureau 1 Last year was the worst on record in Nuevo Laredo with 288 homicides.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Officers List (UNCLASSIFIED)
    United States Department of State Telephone Directory This customized report includes the following section(s): Key Officers List (UNCLASSIFIED) 9/13/2021 Provided by Global Information Services, A/GIS Cover UNCLASSIFIED Key Officers of Foreign Service Posts Afghanistan FMO Inna Rotenberg ICASS Chair CDR David Millner IMO Cem Asci KABUL (E) Great Massoud Road, (VoIP, US-based) 301-490-1042, Fax No working Fax, INMARSAT Tel 011-873-761-837-725, ISO Aaron Smith Workweek: Saturday - Thursday 0800-1630, Website: https://af.usembassy.gov/ Algeria Officer Name DCM OMS Melisa Woolfolk ALGIERS (E) 5, Chemin Cheikh Bachir Ibrahimi, +213 (770) 08- ALT DIR Tina Dooley-Jones 2000, Fax +213 (23) 47-1781, Workweek: Sun - Thurs 08:00-17:00, CM OMS Bonnie Anglov Website: https://dz.usembassy.gov/ Co-CLO Lilliana Gonzalez Officer Name FM Michael Itinger DCM OMS Allie Hutton HRO Geoff Nyhart FCS Michele Smith INL Patrick Tanimura FM David Treleaven LEGAT James Bolden HRO TDY Ellen Langston MGT Ben Dille MGT Kristin Rockwood POL/ECON Richard Reiter MLO/ODC Andrew Bergman SDO/DATT COL Erik Bauer POL/ECON Roselyn Ramos TREAS Julie Malec SDO/DATT Christopher D'Amico AMB Chargé Ross L Wilson AMB Chargé Gautam Rana CG Ben Ousley Naseman CON Jeffrey Gringer DCM Ian McCary DCM Acting DCM Eric Barbee PAO Daniel Mattern PAO Eric Barbee GSO GSO William Hunt GSO TDY Neil Richter RSO Fernando Matus RSO Gregg Geerdes CLO Christine Peterson AGR Justina Torry DEA Edward (Joe) Kipp CLO Ikram McRiffey FMO Maureen Danzot FMO Aamer Khan IMO Jaime Scarpatti ICASS Chair Jeffrey Gringer IMO Daniel Sweet Albania Angola TIRANA (E) Rruga Stavro Vinjau 14, +355-4-224-7285, Fax +355-4- 223-2222, Workweek: Monday-Friday, 8:00am-4:30 pm.
    [Show full text]
  • The Streets of Laredo: Reevaluating the Vernacular Urbanism of Old Nuevo Santander
    85THACSA ANNUAL MEETING ANDTECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE 34 1 The Streets of Laredo: Reevaluating the Vernacular Urbanism of Old Nuevo Santander RAFAEL LONGORIA University of Houston STEPHEN FOX Anchorage Foundation of Texas As part of the last Spanish colonization effort in the New area with the highest percentage of Mexican-American World, don Jose de Escandon, Conde de la Sierra Gorda, residents. coordinated settlement of the Mexican province of Nuevo Between 1749 and 1755 Escandon established twenty Santander, which comprised the present Mexican state of towns in the province of Nuevo Santander.' These included Tamaulipas and most of the U.S. state of Texas south of the a string of villages along the Rio Grande, the far north edge Nueces River. Of the towns Escandon established in Nuevo of settlement: Camargo (1749), Reynosa (1749), Revilla Santander in the middle of the 18th century, the five located (1750, now called Guerrero Viejo), Mier (1 752), and Laredo near the Rio Grande (Rio Bravo del Norte) ended up on either (1755). In the earliest years of Nuevo Santander, property side of the international border between Mexico and the was held communally by the residents in each settlement. In United States. One of these, Laredo, Texas, is now in the 1767 a royal commission surveyed town sites and pasturage United States. Laredo is defined by its Mexican Creole allotments and distributed titles to private property among architecture and urban spatiality. Architecture materially settlers. Along the Rio Grande, each household received a represents community identity in this, the U.S. metropolitan town lot on which to build a house and a porcidn, a long, narrow, 5,300-acre tract of land with river frontage, on which to raise livestock.
    [Show full text]
  • Del Rio Acuña Nuevo Laredo Laredo Eagle Pass Piedras Negras
    Del Rio Acuña Eagle Pass Piedras Negras Laredo Nuevo Laredo APPENDIX A POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE & TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP CHARTER AND ANNEX I LAREDO – COAHUILA/NUEVO LEON/TAMAULIPAS BORDER MASTER PLAN Policy Advisory Committee and Technical Working Group Charter PREAMBLE The participating United States and Mexican government agencies, as well as rail stakeholders whose objectives include border transportation infrastructure planning, programming, construction and/or management: Recognize the bilateral nature of border transportation issues and that the latter can be most effectively addressed jointly; Reaffirm that international trade is dependent upon well-coordinated transportation planning processes along the border; Acknowledge that the United States (U.S.) and Mexican border region transportation assets are experiencing congestion issues that must be addressed to avoid adverse trade and environmental impacts; and Convinced of the need to better coordinate planning at the federal, state, regional, and local level to improve transportation infrastructure in the border region of their respective countries, including at formal ports of entry (POEs) and the transportation infrastructure serving formal POEs, Hereby wish to create the Laredo – Coahuila/Nuevo Leon/Tamaulipas Border Master Plan’s Policy Advisory Committee and Technical Working Group as follows: SECTION 1: PURPOSE Under the direction of the U.S. / Mexico Joint Working Committee, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) hereby announces the establishment of the Laredo – Coahuila/Nuevo Leon/Tamaulipas Border Master Plan Policy Advisory Committee and Technical Working Group. The government agencies and rail stakeholders will participate in the development of a Border Master Plan – a comprehensive approach for coordinating planning and delivery of POE and transportation infrastructure projects serving POEs under the jurisdiction of TxDOT’s Laredo District and the correspondent Mexican States.
    [Show full text]
  • Del Rio Acuña Nuevo Laredo Laredo Eagle Pass Piedras Negras
    Del Rio Acuña Eagle Pass Piedras Negras Laredo Nuevo Laredo Laredo-Coahuila/Nuevo León/Tamaulipas Border Master Plan Executive Summary Introduction Border Master Plans, as defined and supported by the U.S./Mexico Joint Working Committee on Transportation Planning and Programming, the Federal Highway Administration, and the U.S. Department of State, are comprehensive long range plans to inventory transportation and port of entry (POE) infrastructure that facilitate trade, and prioritize planned transportation and POE projects within a defined study area. The Border Master Plans represent binational stakeholder efforts to (i) prioritize and promote POE and related transportation projects; (ii) inform decision-making; (iii) allocate limited funding sources, and (iv) ensure continued dialogue and coordination on future POE and supporting transportation infrastructure needs and projects. The Laredo-Coahuila/Nuevo León/Tamaulipas Border Master Plan (Border Master Plan) is the second Border Master Plan that on the U.S.-Mexico border and followed a similar approach as the California-Baja California Border Master Plan. The objectives of the Laredo-Coahuila/Nuevo León/Tamaulipas Border Master Plan were to: design a stakeholder agency involvement process that is inclusive and ensure the participation of all involved in POE projects and the transportation infrastructure serving those POEs; increase the understanding of the POE and transportation planning processes on both sides of the border; develop and implement a plan for prioritizing and promoting POE and related transportation projects, including evaluation criteria and rankings over the short, medium and long term; and establish a process to ensure continued dialogue among federal, state, regional, and local stakeholder agencies in Texas and Mexico to ensure continued coordination on current and future POE and supporting transportation infrastructure needs and projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuevo Laredo District
    TAMAULIPAS REGULATIONS AND PROCEDURES ON DEATH CASES The State of Tamaulipas, Mexico does not have an official morgue. Instead, the government has an agreement with local funeral homes that function as morgues for all death cases. State regulations do not specify a term for interment, and funeral homes may keep the remains for varying amounts of time, depending on if the body is embalmed. The two funeral homes that work with the state government as morgues in Nuevo Laredo are: Funeraria Valdez 2161 Campeche Phone: 011-52-867-719-0402 (dialing from the U.S.) Funeraria La Paz 3352 Francisco I. Madero Phone: 011-52-867-712-0212 (dialing from the U.S.) CREMATION Cremation costs are approximately $1,000.00 USD, which includes processing the proper documentation (death registration, death certificate, and the permit from Secretary of Health). The remains are preserved in a simple plastic container. If the family wants a different type of container, they may purchase one separately. The funeral home can ship the ashes through the services of a courier company, for which the family would incur an additional cost. SHIPMENT OF REMAINS TO THE U.S. The best option for shipments of remains to the United States is to contact a funeral home located in Laredo, Texas, who can then work with the funeral home in Nuevo Laredo, Mexico throughout the entire process. Once the remains are in Texas, they can be transferred to any city in the United States. Mexican funeral homes charge approximately $1,200.00 USD, which includes a simple casket, embalming, documentation, and shipment to Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas-Mexico International Bridges and Border Crossings
    TEXAS-MEXICO INTERNATIONAL BRIDGES AND BORDER CROSSINGS Existing and Proposed 2015 Texas-Mexico International Bridges and Border Crossings Existing and Proposed 2015 Table of Contents Overview ...............................................................................................................................................................................i Map ..................................................................................................................................................................................... II Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................... III Veterans International Bridge at Los Tomates ................................................................................................................ 1 Gateway International Bridge ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Free Trade Bridge ............................................................................................................................................................... 8 Weslaco-Progreso International Bridge ......................................................................................................................... 10 Donna International Bridge ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mexico 2019 Crime & Safety Report: Nuevo Laredo
    Mexico 2019 Crime & Safety Report: Nuevo Laredo This is an annual report produced in conjunction with the Regional Security Office at the U.S. Consulate in Nuevo Laredo, Mexico. The current U.S. Department of State Travel Advisory at the date of this report’s publication assesses Mexico at Level 2, indicating travelers should exercise increased caution due to crime. Do not travel to the state of Tamaulipas due to crime. Overall Crime and Safety Situation The U.S. Consulate General in Nuevo Laredo does not assume responsibility for the professional ability or integrity of the individuals or firms appearing in this report. The ACS Unit cannot recommend a particular individual or location and assumes no responsibility for the quality of service provided. Review OSAC’s Mexico-specific webpage for proprietary analytic reports, Consular Messages, and contact information. Crime Threats There is serious risk from crime in Nuevo Laredo. The Mexican government continues to engage in an extensive effort to combat Transnational Criminal Organizations (TCOs), especially along the border. Mexican TCOs, meanwhile, have been engaged in a vicious struggle with each other for control of lucrative drug trafficking routes. In order to prevent and combat violence, the Government of Mexico (GOM) has deployed military troops and federal police throughout the country. The location and timing of armed engagements are unpredictable. The vast majority of those killed have been members of TCOs, and to a lesser extent, federal officers that are fighting them; however, innocent bystanders have died in shootouts between TCOs and Mexican law enforcement, or between rival TCOs. In January 2018, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Refugees: Mexican Businesses Moving to Laredo”
    “The New Refugees: Mexican Businesses Moving to Laredo” Cecilia Garza Texas A&M International University Cecilia Garza, Ph.D. Texas A&M International University College of Arts and Sciences Department of Behavioral, Applied Sciences and Criminal Justice 5201 University Blvd. Laredo, TX 78041 [email protected] (956) 326-2619 “The New Refugees: Mexican Businesses Moving to Laredo” When we think of refugees, we may think of individuals escaping political or religious persecution. In fact, the United Nations defines refugees as “persons fleeing persecution or armed conflict”. Generally, we do not think of businesses as refugees. This report is on the migration pattern of businesses from Nuevo Laredo, Mexico moving to Laredo, Texas. My thesis is that border violence has been the impetus or push factor for businesses moving to Laredo, Texas. An objective of this report is to document the unusual phenomena of business formation and indirectly, to call attention to these business enterprises. First, I will give a brief background on what constitutes the Nuevo Laredo – Laredo border then follow with the extent of the violence in this region and proceed with the business growth experienced in Laredo. Ironically, these migrations of businesses eliminate jobs in Mexico, which further contributes to the problem of unemployment and the potential for continued legal and illegal immigration into the U.S. I will conclude with a series of questions for further research, which raise important issues. For example, what does the practice of moving a business to the U.S. say about our immigration policy? What are the implications for established businesses in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Epic Tradition of the Founding of Nuevo Laredo
    The Epic Tradition of the Founding of Nuevo Laredo Manuel Ceballos-Ramirez Translated by Olivia Cadaval Perder la tierra, perder la lengua, perder las Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, many of its inhabi­ costumbres, es perder el cimiento de la vida, tants abandoned their homes and emigrated to dejar de ser. the other side of the Rio Bravo, where they Pedro Casaldaliga founded a settlement they called Nuevo Laredo in memory of their lost home. The tradition En Nuevo Laredo existe una de las tradiciones adds that they disinterred their dead, moved mas significativas que contribuye a forjar la identidad their remains across the river, and reinterred de los habitantes de la frontera norte mexicana. Se them in Nuevo Laredo so they would not lie in trata de una tradici6n hist6rica que asegura que, en foreign territory. 1848 al perder Mexico la pequefia poblaci6n de Laredo This nationalistic tradition has been repeat­ - a causa de la firma del Tratado de Guadalupe edly cited throughout the history of Nuevo Lare­ Hidalgo entre Mexico y los Estados Unidos - muchos do. In September of 1848 the governor of de los laredenses la abandonaron. SegU,n la tradici6n, Tamaulipas lamented "the deep pains" that the la poblaci6n de Laredo fue abandonada por sus habi­ Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo had caused but tantes porque nose resignaron a pertenecer a una recognized the "worthy and faithful Mexicans" nueva naci6n y decidieron emigrar ala margen who had moved to the Mexican side and found­ derecha del Rio Bravo y fundar otro asentamiento que ed Nuevo Laredo. At the end of the century, bautizaron con el nombre de Nuevo Laredo, en recuer­ Juan E.
    [Show full text]