Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 106 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 106 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 106 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 145 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 5, 1999 No. 133 Senate The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was SCHEDULE If Congress does not reauthorize the called to order by the President pro Mr. MCCAIN. Mr. President, today Airport Improvement Program (AIP), tempore [Mr. THURMOND]. the Senate will resume consideration the Federal Aviation Administration of the pending amendments to the FAA (FAA) will be prohibited from issuing PRAYER bill. Senators should be aware that much needed grants to airports in every state, regardless of whether or The Chaplain, Dr. Lloyd John rollcall votes are possible today prior not funds have been appropriated. We Ogilvie, offered the following prayer: to the 12:30 recess in an attempt to have now entered fiscal year 2000, and Lord of all life, our prayer is like complete action on the bill by the end we cannot put off reauthorization of breathing. We breathe in Your Spirit of the day. As a reminder, first-degree the AIP. The program lapsed as of last and breathe out praise to You. Help us amendments to the bill must be filed to take a deep breath of Your love, Friday. Every day that goes by without by 10 a.m. today. As a further re- an AIP authorization is another day peace, and joy so that we will be re- minder, debate on three judicial nomi- freshed and ready for the day. that important projects cannot move nations took place last night and by ahead. Throughout the day, if we grow weary, previous consent there will be three If we fail to reauthorize this pro- give us a runner's second wind of re- stacked votes on those nominations at gram, we may do significant harm to newed strength. What oxygen is to the 2:15 p.m. today. Following the comple- the transportation infrastructure of lungs, Your Spirit is to our souls. tion of the FAA bill, the Senate will re- our country. AIP grants play a critical Grant the Senators the rhythm of re- sume consideration of the Labor-HHS part of airport development. Without ceiving Your Spirit and leading with appropriations bill. these grants, important safety, secu- supernatural wisdom. In this quiet mo- I thank my colleagues for their at- rity, and capacity projects will be put ment, we join with them in asking You tention. at risk throughout the country. The to match the inflow of Your power with f types of safety projects that airports the outflow of energy for the pressures use AIP grants to fund include instru- of the day. So much depends on in- AIR TRANSPORTATION ment landing systems, runway light- spired leadership from the Senators at IMPROVEMENT ACT ing, and extensions of runway safety this strategic time. Grant each one The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under areas. what he or she needs to serve coura- the previous order, the Senate will re- But the bill does more than provide geously today. Thank You for a great sume consideration of the pending money. It also takes specific, proactive day lived for Your glory. You are our steps to improve aviation safety. For amendments to the FAA bill. Lord and Savior. Amen. example, S. 82 would require that cargo Pending: aircraft be equipped with instruments f Gorton Amendment No. 1892, to consoli- that warn of impending midair colli- date and revise provisions relating to slot rules for certain airports. sions. Passenger aircraft are already PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Gorton (for Rockefeller/Gorton) Amend- equipped with collision avoidance equipment, which gives pilots ample The Honorable GEORGE ment No. 1893, to improve the efficiency of time to make evasive maneuvers. The VOINOVICH, a Senator from the State the air traffic control system. Baucus Amendment No. 1898, to require the need for these devices was highlighted of Ohio, led the Pledge of Allegiance, reporting of the reasons for delays or can- a few months ago by a near-collision as follows: cellations in air flights. between two cargo aircraft over Kan- I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the Mr. MCCAIN. Mr. President, I am sas. Unfortunately, that was not an United States of America, and to the Repub- sorry that I was not here yesterday isolated incident. lic for which it stands, one nation under God, when the debate began. Nevertheless, I On the aviation safety front, the bill indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. rise in support of S. 82, the Air Trans- also: provides explicit AIP funding eli- f portation Improvement Act. As every- gibility for the installation of inte- one should be aware, this is ``must- grated inpavement lighting systems, pass'' legislation that includes numer- and other runway incursion prevention RECOGNITION OF THE ACTING ous provisions to maintain and im- devices, requires more types of fixed- MAJORITY LEADER prove the safety, security and capacity wing aircraft in air commerce to be The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. of our nation's airports and airways. equipped with emergency locator VOINOVICH). The Senator from Arizona Furthermore, this bill would make transmitters by 2002, provides broader is recognized. great strides in enhancing competition authority to the FAA to determine Mr. MCCAIN. I thank the Chair. in the airline industry. what circumstances warrant a criminal · This ``bullet'' symbol identifies statements or insertions which are not spoken by a Member of the Senate on the floor. S11891 . S11892 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð SENATE October 5, 1999 history record check for persons per- including data captured by flight data low. Airfares at these airports continue forming security screening of pas- recorders. Information about errors is to be consistently higher than other sengers and cargo, reauthorizes the shared to focus on situations in which airports of comparable size. aviation insurance program, also hardware, air traffic control proce- It does not take a trained economist known as war risk insurance. This pro- dures, or company practices create haz- to figure that out. If you restrict the gram provides insurance for commer- ardous situations. number of flights, then obviously the cial aircraft that are operating in high It requires the FAA to study and pro- cost of those flights will go up. risk areas, such as countries at war or mote improved training in the human Additionally, the federal permimeter on the verge of war. Commercial insur- factors arena, including the develop- rule continues to prevent airlines based ers usually will not provide coverage ment of specific training curricula. outside the perimeter from gaining for such operations, which are often re- It provides FAA whistleblowers who competitive access to Reagan National. quired to advance U.S. foreign policy uncover safety risks with the ability to This GAO report reinforces my view or to support our overseas national se- seek redress if they are subject to re- that the perimeter rule is a restrictive curity operations. The program expired taliation for their actions. and anti-competitive Federal regula- on August 6, 1999, and cannot be ex- The legislation provides employees of tion that prohibits airlines from flying tended without this authorization, airlines, and employees of airline con- the routes sought by their customers. gives the FAA the authority to fine un- tractors and subcontractors, with stat- According to testimony presented to ruly airline passengers who interfere utory whistleblower protections to fa- the Commerce Committee by the De- with the operation or safety of a civil cilitate their providing air safety infor- partment of Transportation, the perim- flight, up to $10,000 per violation, au- mation. eter rule is not needed for safety or thorizes $450,000 to address the problem These provisions will be critical in operational reasons. For that matter, of bird ingestions into aircraft engines, the continuing effort to enhance safety neither are slot controls. Therefore, authorizes $9.1 million over three years and reduce the accident rate. these restrictions simply are not war- for a safety and security management Of all the bills that the Senate may ranted. program to provide training for avia- consider this year, the Air Transpor- So long as the Federal Government tion safety personnel. The program tation Improvement Act should be maintains outdated unneeded restric- would concentrate on personnel from easy. This bill is substantially the tions, which favor established airlines countries that are not in compliance same as the Wendell H. Ford National over new entrants, deregulation will with international safety standards, Air Transportation System Improve- not be complete. Slot controls and the authorizes at least $30 million annually ment Act, which this body approved perimeter rule are Federal interference for the FAA to purchase precision in- last September by a vote of 92±1. If with the market's ability to reflect strument landing systems (ILS) anything, this bill is better than last consumer preferences. We should not through its ILS inventory program, au- year's. There is no rational reason why be in the position of choosing sides in thorizes at least $5 million for the FAA we can't take care of this quickly. the marketplace. to carry out at least one project to test Because S. 82 is so similar to last With respect to Reagan National, I and evaluate innovative airport secu- year's FAA reauthorization bill, I will would like to make one final point. rity systems and related technologies, skip a lengthy description of every pro- Just last month, the GAO came out including explosive detection systems vision, particularly those that have not with another study confirming that the in an airport environment, requires the changed.
Recommended publications
  • Business & Commercial Aviation
    BUSINESS & COMMERCIAL AVIATION LEONARDO AW609 PERFORMANCE PLATEAUS OCEANIC APRIL 2020 $10.00 AviationWeek.com/BCA Business & Commercial Aviation AIRCRAFT UPDATE Leonardo AW609 Bringing tiltrotor technology to civil aviation FUEL PLANNING ALSO IN THIS ISSUE Part 91 Department Inspections Is It Airworthy? Oceanic Fuel Planning Who Says It’s Ready? APRIL 2020 VOL. 116 NO. 4 Performance Plateaus Digital Edition Copyright Notice The content contained in this digital edition (“Digital Material”), as well as its selection and arrangement, is owned by Informa. and its affiliated companies, licensors, and suppliers, and is protected by their respective copyright, trademark and other proprietary rights. Upon payment of the subscription price, if applicable, you are hereby authorized to view, download, copy, and print Digital Material solely for your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that by doing any of the foregoing, you acknowledge that (i) you do not and will not acquire any ownership rights of any kind in the Digital Material or any portion thereof, (ii) you must preserve all copyright and other proprietary notices included in any downloaded Digital Material, and (iii) you must comply in all respects with the use restrictions set forth below and in the Informa Privacy Policy and the Informa Terms of Use (the “Use Restrictions”), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Any use not in accordance with, and any failure to comply fully with, the Use Restrictions is expressly prohibited by law, and may result in severe civil and criminal penalties. Violators will be prosecuted to the maximum possible extent. You may not modify, publish, license, transmit (including by way of email, facsimile or other electronic means), transfer, sell, reproduce (including by copying or posting on any network computer), create derivative works from, display, store, or in any way exploit, broadcast, disseminate or distribute, in any format or media of any kind, any of the Digital Material, in whole or in part, without the express prior written consent of Informa.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacramento International Airport Airline Passenger Statistics July 2011
    Sacramento International Airport Airline Passenger Statistics July 2011 CURRENT MONTH FISCAL YEAR TO DATE CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE THIS YEAR LAST YEAR % + / ( - ) 2011/12 2010/11 % + / ( - ) 2011 2010 % + / ( - ) Enplaned Domestic Alaska Airlines 25,451 25,519 (0.3%) 25,451 25,519 (0.3%) 137,442 123,342 11.4% American Airlines 21,359 16,593 28.7% 21,359 16,593 28.7% 125,549 107,297 17.0% Continental Airlines 13,524 14,658 (7.7%) 13,524 14,658 (7.7%) 91,916 94,379 (2.6%) Delta Airlines 34,719 36,317 (4.4%) 34,719 36,317 (4.4%) 165,845 184,669 (10.2%) Frontier Airlines 14,565 15,931 (8.6%) 14,565 15,931 (8.6%) 75,597 84,949 (11.0%) Hawaiian Airlines 7,573 7,536 0.5% 7,573 7,536 0.5% 50,427 49,307 2.3% Horizon Air 11,316 13,753 (17.7%) 11,316 13,753 (17.7%) 69,346 81,296 (14.7%) Jet Blue 11,909 10,453 13.9% 11,909 10,453 13.9% 67,313 64,002 5.2% Mesa/US Airways Express/YV - 753 (100.0%) - 753 (100.0%) 3,472 2,821 23.1% Skywest/Delta Connection 11,149 5,818 91.6% 11,149 5,818 91.6% 57,907 31,982 81.1% Skywest/United Express 13,461 15,635 (13.9%) 13,461 15,635 (13.9%) 97,706 107,786 (9.4%) Southwest 192,922 205,786 (6.3%) 192,922 205,786 (6.3%) 1,328,959 1,380,693 (3.7%) United Airlines 28,903 29,249 (1.2%) 28,903 29,249 (1.2%) 171,877 173,518 (0.9%) US Airways 25,959 25,755 0.8% 25,959 25,755 0.8% 129,707 129,309 0.3% CHARTER - - - - - - 412,810 423,756 (2.6%) 412,810 423,756 (2.6%) 2,573,063 2,615,350 (1.6%) International AeroMexico 1,583 - 1,583 - 1,583 - Alaska Airlines 1,665 - 1,665 - 12,220 - Mexicana - 5,303 (100.0%) - 5,303 (100.0%) -
    [Show full text]
  • G410020002/A N/A Client Ref
    Solicitation No. - N° de l'invitation Amd. No. - N° de la modif. Buyer ID - Id de l'acheteur G410020002/A N/A Client Ref. No. - N° de réf. du client File No. - N° du dossier CCC No./N° CCC - FMS No./N° VME G410020002 G410020002 RETURN BIDS TO: Title – Sujet: RETOURNER LES SOUMISSIONS À: PURCHASE OF AIR CARRIER FLIGHT MOVEMENT DATA AND AIR COMPANY PROFILE DATA Bids are to be submitted electronically Solicitation No. – N° de l’invitation Date by e-mail to the following addresses: G410020002 July 8, 2019 Client Reference No. – N° référence du client Attn : [email protected] GETS Reference No. – N° de reference de SEAG Bids will not be accepted by any File No. – N° de dossier CCC No. / N° CCC - FMS No. / N° VME other methods of delivery. G410020002 N/A Time Zone REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Sollicitation Closes – L’invitation prend fin Fuseau horaire DEMANDE DE PROPOSITION at – à 02 :00 PM Eastern Standard on – le August 19, 2019 Time EST F.O.B. - F.A.B. Proposal To: Plant-Usine: Destination: Other-Autre: Canadian Transportation Agency Address Inquiries to : - Adresser toutes questions à: Email: We hereby offer to sell to Her Majesty the Queen in right [email protected] of Canada, in accordance with the terms and conditions set out herein, referred to herein or attached hereto, the Telephone No. –de téléphone : FAX No. – N° de FAX goods, services, and construction listed herein and on any Destination – of Goods, Services, and Construction: attached sheets at the price(s) set out thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Miami-Dade Aviation Department
    Miami-Dade Aviation Department Aviation Statistics Freight Carried - All Airlines Facility: MIA Units: Short Tons Current Year: 10/2008 - 09/2009 Prior Year:10/2007 - 09/2008 Domestic International Total % Total Domestic International Arrival Departure Arrival Departure Freight Change Operator Freight Arrival Departure Arrival Departure 1,072.71 576.85 102,274.77 82,085.54 186,009.87 4.70% Arrow Air Inc dba Arrow Cargo 177,658.38 176.02 24.64 90,907.92 86,549.80 0.00 0.00 88,469.11 80,646.07 169,115.18 -19.72% LAN Airlines f/k/a LAN Chile SA 210,661.41 0.00 0.00 108,679.01 101,982.40 16,930.09 10,610.21 66,304.74 52,151.21 145,996.25 -13.02% United Parcel Service 167,841.52 18,554.52 13,794.09 75,516.57 59,976.34 0.00 0.00 74,171.56 59,663.09 133,834.65 -16.64% Tampa Cargo S.A. fka Tampa 160,545.15 0.00 0.00 85,662.87 74,882.28 Airlines 92.00 92.00 70,159.66 59,667.03 130,010.69 -26.35% Centurion Air Cargo 176,520.00 190.00 190.00 92,027.00 84,113.00 19,053.20 18,085.60 47,488.80 31,104.70 115,732.30 -24.58% American Airlines Inc 153,450.50 24,095.50 28,221.40 64,487.20 36,646.40 54,637.00 45,007.83 0.00 290.00 99,934.83 -9.93% Federal Express Corporation 110,952.56 64,973.52 45,661.52 0.00 317.52 10,005.77 7,325.30 28,235.37 37,789.61 83,356.05 30.42% ABX Air 63,912.36 304.01 684.77 28,837.23 34,086.35 0.00 0.00 29,650.30 37,691.47 67,341.77 -14.12% Amerijet International 78,411.69 0.00 0.00 29,877.59 48,534.10 813.27 732.46 35,167.78 21,852.19 58,565.70 -32.36% Southern Air Inc 86,581.41 0.00 0.00 49,197.13 37,384.28 1,219.03 60.08 28,053.94 20,361.20 49,694.25 22.68% Atlas Air Inc 40,507.95 9,678.58 1,175.01 16,043.06 13,611.30 42.35 42.35 24,096.30 19,103.37 43,284.37 -39.15% Cielos Del Peru SA 71,135.13 0.00 0.00 39,146.51 31,988.62 3,027.07 886.64 18,678.17 17,239.72 39,831.60 -36.46% Florida West International Airways 62,687.03 3,077.66 2,773.66 29,842.93 26,992.78 0.00 0.00 17,874.13 14,802.81 32,676.94 100.00% Linea Aerea Carguera de Colombia 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview and Trends
    9310-01 Chapter 1 10/12/99 14:48 Page 15 1 M Overview and Trends The Transportation Research Board (TRB) study committee that pro- duced Winds of Change held its final meeting in the spring of 1991. The committee had reviewed the general experience of the U.S. airline in- dustry during the more than a dozen years since legislation ended gov- ernment economic regulation of entry, pricing, and ticket distribution in the domestic market.1 The committee examined issues ranging from passenger fares and service in small communities to aviation safety and the federal government’s performance in accommodating the escalating demands on air traffic control. At the time, it was still being debated whether airline deregulation was favorable to consumers. Once viewed as contrary to the public interest,2 the vigorous airline competition 1 The Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 was preceded by market-oriented administra- tive reforms adopted by the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) beginning in 1975. 2 Congress adopted the public utility form of regulation for the airline industry when it created CAB, partly out of concern that the small scale of the industry and number of willing entrants would lead to excessive competition and capacity, ultimately having neg- ative effects on service and perhaps leading to monopolies and having adverse effects on consumers in the end (Levine 1965; Meyer et al. 1959). 15 9310-01 Chapter 1 10/12/99 14:48 Page 16 16 ENTRY AND COMPETITION IN THE U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY spurred by deregulation now is commonly credited with generating large and lasting public benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C Informal Complaints to DOT by New Entrant Airlines About Unfair Exclusionary Practices March 1993 to May 1999
    9310-08 App C 10/12/99 13:40 Page 171 Appendix C Informal Complaints to DOT by New Entrant Airlines About Unfair Exclusionary Practices March 1993 to May 1999 UNFAIR PRICING AND CAPACITY RESPONSES 1. Date Raised: May 1999 Complaining Party: AccessAir Complained Against: Northwest Airlines Description: AccessAir, a new airline headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa, began service in the New York–LaGuardia and Los Angeles to Mo- line/Quad Cities/Peoria, Illinois, markets. Northwest offers connecting service in these markets. AccessAir alleged that Northwest was offering fares in these markets that were substantially below Northwest’s costs. 171 9310-08 App C 10/12/99 13:40 Page 172 172 ENTRY AND COMPETITION IN THE U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY 2. Date Raised: March 1999 Complaining Party: AccessAir Complained Against: Delta, Northwest, and TWA Description: AccessAir was a new entrant air carrier, headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa. In February 1999, AccessAir began service to New York–LaGuardia and Los Angeles from Des Moines, Iowa, and Moline/ Quad Cities/Peoria, Illinois. AccessAir offered direct service (nonstop or single-plane) between these points, while competitors generally offered connecting service. In the Des Moines/Moline–Los Angeles market, Ac- cessAir offered an introductory roundtrip fare of $198 during the first month of operation and then planned to raise the fare to $298 after March 5, 1999. AccessAir pointed out that its lowest fare of $298 was substantially below the major airlines’ normal 14- to 21-day advance pur- chase fares of $380 to $480 per roundtrip and was less than half of the major airlines’ normal 7-day advance purchase fare of $680.
    [Show full text]
  • Miami-Dade Aviation Department
    Miami-Dade Aviation Department Aviation Statistics Gross Landing Weight - All Airlines Facility: MIA Units: 1,000 lbs Current Year: 10/2009 - 09/2010 Prior Year:10/2008 - 09/2009 Domestic International Total Land Wt. % Total Land Wt. Domestic International Arrival Departure Arrival Departure Change Operator Arrival Departure Arrival Departure 7,974,166 0 7,021,577 0 14,995,743 0.71% American Airlines Inc 14,889,853 7,822,437 0 7,067,416 0 1,091,452 0 0 0 1,091,452 38.57% Delta Air Lines Inc 787,667 787,667 0 0 0 614,638 0 299,435 0 914,073 16.53% Executive Airlines dba American 784,413 489,141 0 295,272 0 Eagle Airlines Inc 250,558 0 536,928 0 787,486 -4.87% United Parcel Service 827,834 358,175 0 469,659 0 25,802 0 707,496 0 733,298 -3.50% LAN Airlines f/k/a LAN Chile SA 759,912 3,080 0 756,832 0 7,542 0 693,941 0 701,483 -9.03% Arrow Air Inc dba Arrow Cargo 771,143 26,890 0 744,253 0 0 0 515,691 0 515,691 -0.23% TAM Linhas Aéreas SA 516,899 142 0 516,757 0 0 0 504,957 0 504,957 8.45% Tampa Cargo S.A. fka Tampa 465,617 0 0 465,617 0 Airlines 477,653 0 1,416 0 479,069 12.65% Federal Express Corporation 425,280 424,372 0 908 0 0 0 441,677 0 441,677 -3.62% Centurion Air Cargo 458,272 806 0 457,466 0 437,054 0 4,380 0 441,434 6.61% Continental Airlines 414,080 414,080 0 0 0 375,608 0 60,844 0 436,452 -23.63% Sales Ticket - Stats Only 571,475 528,403 0 43,072 0 0 0 435,728 0 435,728 -1.68% British Airways 443,178 0 0 443,178 0 408,491 0 0 0 408,491 1.58% US Airways Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of Transportation Federal
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ORDER TRANSPORTATION JO 7340.2E FEDERAL AVIATION Effective Date: ADMINISTRATION July 24, 2014 Air Traffic Organization Policy Subject: Contractions Includes Change 1 dated 11/13/14 https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/CNT/3-3.HTM A 3- Company Country Telephony Ltr AAA AVICON AVIATION CONSULTANTS & AGENTS PAKISTAN AAB ABELAG AVIATION BELGIUM ABG AAC ARMY AIR CORPS UNITED KINGDOM ARMYAIR AAD MANN AIR LTD (T/A AMBASSADOR) UNITED KINGDOM AMBASSADOR AAE EXPRESS AIR, INC. (PHOENIX, AZ) UNITED STATES ARIZONA AAF AIGLE AZUR FRANCE AIGLE AZUR AAG ATLANTIC FLIGHT TRAINING LTD. UNITED KINGDOM ATLANTIC AAH AEKO KULA, INC D/B/A ALOHA AIR CARGO (HONOLULU, UNITED STATES ALOHA HI) AAI AIR AURORA, INC. (SUGAR GROVE, IL) UNITED STATES BOREALIS AAJ ALFA AIRLINES CO., LTD SUDAN ALFA SUDAN AAK ALASKA ISLAND AIR, INC. (ANCHORAGE, AK) UNITED STATES ALASKA ISLAND AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. UNITED STATES AMERICAN AAM AIM AIR REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AIM AIR AAN AMSTERDAM AIRLINES B.V. NETHERLANDS AMSTEL AAO ADMINISTRACION AERONAUTICA INTERNACIONAL, S.A. MEXICO AEROINTER DE C.V. AAP ARABASCO AIR SERVICES SAUDI ARABIA ARABASCO AAQ ASIA ATLANTIC AIRLINES CO., LTD THAILAND ASIA ATLANTIC AAR ASIANA AIRLINES REPUBLIC OF KOREA ASIANA AAS ASKARI AVIATION (PVT) LTD PAKISTAN AL-AAS AAT AIR CENTRAL ASIA KYRGYZSTAN AAU AEROPA S.R.L. ITALY AAV ASTRO AIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. PHILIPPINES ASTRO-PHIL AAW AFRICAN AIRLINES CORPORATION LIBYA AFRIQIYAH AAX ADVANCE AVIATION CO., LTD THAILAND ADVANCE AVIATION AAY ALLEGIANT AIR, INC. (FRESNO, CA) UNITED STATES ALLEGIANT AAZ AEOLUS AIR LIMITED GAMBIA AEOLUS ABA AERO-BETA GMBH & CO., STUTTGART GERMANY AEROBETA ABB AFRICAN BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATIONS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF AFRICAN BUSINESS THE CONGO ABC ABC WORLD AIRWAYS GUIDE ABD AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC ICELAND ATLANTA ABE ABAN AIR IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC ABAN OF) ABF SCANWINGS OY, FINLAND FINLAND SKYWINGS ABG ABAKAN-AVIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION ABAKAN-AVIA ABH HOKURIKU-KOUKUU CO., LTD JAPAN ABI ALBA-AIR AVIACION, S.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Customers First Plan, Highlighting Definitions of Terms
    RepLayout for final pdf 8/28/2001 9:24 AM Page 1 2001 Annual Report [c u s t o m e r s] AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION RepLayout for final pdf 8/28/2001 9:24 AM Page 2 Officers Carol B. Hallett President and CEO John M. Meenan Senior Vice President, Industry Policy Edward A. Merlis Senior Vice President, Legislative and International Affairs John R. Ryan Acting Senior Vice President, Aviation Safety and Operations Vice President, Air Traffic Management Robert P. Warren mi Thes Air Transports i Associationo n of America, Inc. serves its Senior Vice President, member airlines and their customers by: General Counsel and Secretary 2 • Assisting the airline industry in continuing to prov i d e James L. Casey the world’s safest system of transportation Vice President and • Transmitting technical expertise and operational Deputy General Counsel kn o w l e d g e among member airlines to improve safety, service and efficiency J. Donald Collier Vice President, • Advocating fair airline taxation and regulation world- Engineering, Maintenance and Materiel wide, ensuring a profitable and competitive industry Albert H. Prest Vice President, Operations Nestor N. Pylypec Vice President, Industry Services Michael D. Wascom Vice President, Communications Richard T. Brandenburg Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer David A. Swierenga Chief Economist RepLayout for final pdf 8/28/2001 9:24 AM Page 3 [ c u s t o m e r s ] Table of Contents Officers . .2 The member airlines of the Air Mission . .2 President’s Letter . .5 Transport Association are committed to Goals . .5 providing the highest level of customer Highlights .
    [Show full text]
  • Forward-Thinking Efficient Competitive
    EFFICIENT COMPETITIVE FORWARD-THINKING ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 2013 HIGHLIGHTS ADM +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ FINANCIAL RETROSPECTIVE OPERATIONS (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) 2011-2013 2013 2012 2011 20101 2009 Passenger traffic Cargo volume (metric tons) Aircraft movements 2011 13,668,829 2011 189,318 2011 253,298 Revenues $ 446,584 $ 435,461 $ 426,968 $ 389,314 $ 350,968 2012 13,809,820 2012 185,028 2012 243,436 Excess (deficiency) 2013 14,095,272 2013 177,165 2013 234,638 of revenues over expenses 13,625 6,941 5,423 (9,040) (8,989) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ EBITDA 197,835 189,603 183,978 2 163,974 2 151,466 Investments $ 177,353 $ 194,722 $ 113,685 $ 64,601 $ 186,414 REAL ESTATE AND COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT 1. The Corporation adopted International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as of its fiscal year beginning January 1, 2010. 2013 2011-2013 2. Excluding the write-down in 2008 (or gain in 2010 and 2011) on investments in floating rate notes (originally ABCP). New leases Investments generated Jobs created (In square metres) (In millions of dollars) Estimates
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE on AIR LAW (Montréal, 20 April to 2
    DCCD Doc No. 28 28/4/09 (English only) INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AIR LAW (Montréal, 20 April to 2 May 2009) CONVENTION ON COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGE CAUSED BY AIRCRAFT TO THIRD PARTIES AND CONVENTION ON COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGE TO THIRD PARTIES, RESULTING FROM ACTS OF UNLAWFUL INTERFERENCE INVOLVING AIRCRAFT (Presented by the Air Crash Victims Families Group) 1. INTRODUCTION – SUPPLEMENTAL AND OTHER COMPENSATIONS 1.1 The apocalyptic terrorist attack by the means of four hi-jacked planes committed against the World Trade Center in New York, NY , the Pentagon in Arlington, VA and the aborted flight ending in a crash in the rural area in Shankville, PA ON September 11th, 2001 is the only real time example that triggered this proposed Convention on Compensation for Damage to Third Parties from Acts of Unlawful Interference Involving Aircraft. 1.2 It is therefore important to look towards the post incident resolution of this tragedy in order to adequately and pro actively complete ONE new General Risk Convention (including compensation for ALL catastrophic damages) for the twenty first century. 2. DISCUSSION 2.1 Immediately after September 11th, 2001 – the Government and Congress met with all affected and interested parties resulting in the “Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act” (Public Law 107-42-Sept. 22,2001). 2.2 This Law provided the basis for Rules and Regulations for: a) Airline Stabilization; b) Aviation Insurance; c) Tax Provisions; d) Victims Compensation; and e) Air Transportation Safety. DCCD Doc No. 28 - 2 - 2.3 The Airline Stabilization Act created the legislative vehicle needed to reimburse the air transport industry for their losses of income as a result of the flight interruption due to the 911 attack.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Iv Regionals/Commuters
    CHAPTER IV REGIONALS/COMMUTERS For purposes of the Federal Aviation REVIEW OF 20032 Administration (FAA) forecasts, air carriers that are included as part of the regional/commuter airline industry meet three criteria. First, a The results for the regional/commuter industry for regional/commuter carrier flies a majority of their 2003 reflect the continuation of a trend that started available seat miles (ASMs) using aircraft having with the events of September 11th and have been 70 seats or less. Secondly, the service provided by drawn out by the Iraq War and Severe Acute these carriers is primarily regularly scheduled Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). These “shocks” to passenger service. Thirdly, the primary mission of the system have led to the large air carriers posting the carrier is to provide connecting service for its losses in passengers for 3 years running. The code-share partners. losses often reflect diversions in traffic to the regional/commuter carriers. These carriers During 2003, 75 reporting regional/commuter recorded double-digit growth in both capacity and airlines met this definition. Monthly traffic data for traffic for the second time in as many years. History 10 of these carriers was compiled from the has demonstrated that the regional/commuter Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Form 41 industry endures periods of uncertainty better than and T-100 filings. Traffic for the remaining the larger air carriers. During the oil embargo of 65 carriers was compiled solely from T-100 filings. 1 1973, the recession in 1990, and the Gulf War in Prior to fiscal year 2003, 10 regionals/commuters 1991, the regional/commuter industry consistently reported on DOT Form 41 while 65 smaller outperformed the larger air carriers.
    [Show full text]