1 the BROOKINGS INSTITUTION Brookings Cafeteria Podcast September 19, 2018 CONTRIBUTORS HOST FRED DEWS BRUCE JONES Vice Preside

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 the BROOKINGS INSTITUTION Brookings Cafeteria Podcast September 19, 2018 CONTRIBUTORS HOST FRED DEWS BRUCE JONES Vice Preside THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION Brookings Cafeteria Podcast September 19, 2018 CONTRIBUTORS HOST FRED DEWS BRUCE JONES Vice President and Director – Foreign Policy Senior Fellow – Foreign Policy, Project on International Order and Strategy 1 DEWS: Welcome to the Brookings Cafeteria, the podcast about ideas and the experts who have them. I'm Fred Dews. The 73rd Session of the United Nations General Assembly is about to get underway in New York City. Delegates will grapple with issues ranging from economic growth, to sustainable development, to promoting human rights, to combating international terrorism, to maintaining peace and security. The last item of peace and security is the topic of this special episode of The Brookings Cafeteria. Here to share his ideas and research on that matter is Bruce Jones, the Vice President and Director of Foreign Policy at Brookings, and author of numerous books on America's role in the global order, including “Still Ours to Lead: America, Rising Powers, and the Tension between Rivalry and Restraint.” And he is a co-author of a new paper titled “The New Challenges to International Peace and Security: Updating the Prevention Agenda.” You can follow the Brookings Podcast Network on Twitter @policypodcasts to get the latest information about all of our shows. And now on with the interview. Bruce welcome back to the Brookings Cafeteria. JONES: Thanks for having me again. DEWS: I say welcome back because you last appeared on the show in May of 2017 talking about your book about the Marshall Plan and the U.S. role in setting that up. So I encourage listeners to go find that and listen to a very interesting book and interview. But we're here today to talk about your new paper you’re the co-author with scholars including Charles Coll, Dan Toubolets, and Jason Fritz. It's on new challenges to international peace and security. And the opening sentence of the executive summary you write, “the world in 2018 faces an international security environment measurably worse than that of a mere five years earlier.” How is it worse? JONES: Well there are two main factors. First of all, after roughly 20 years of steady declines in the level of war in the world in every continent and every region, we saw a 2 substantial and major reversal in that trend from about 2012 onwards, an increase in both the number and the intensity of wars in the world. Most of that is concentrated in the Middle East. The second thing we've witnessed is the beginnings of a sustained erosion of relations between the major military powers: the United States, China, and Russia in particular. Those are not yet at an acute phase or anything like that, but there is a steady deterioration, particularly in U.S.-Russia relations and increasingly now in U.S.-China relations. Those two things intersect because to respond to wars in the post-Cold War period, primarily the United States has either been the driver of action or it's gone to the U.N. Security Council and pushed the U.N. to act to respond to war. But that's been much harder to do in the last few years because tensions between the United States, Russia, and China have blocked the U.N. Security Council from acting in some of the critical cases. So wars are getting worse. And great power relations are impeding us from trying to treat that problem. DEWS: Now there's a lot of data in your paper. I think it's a fascinating approach to put numbers behind these observations behind these research findings. And one of them it strikes me as very interesting, is that major wars, I think it's over 10,000 deaths a year, are the ones that are increasing and it's kind of overwhelming the decrease in less major wars. Can you explain kind of that dynamic? JONES: Yeah, this goes to a maybe a controversial point in the paper. There's been a lot of pieces in the last couple of years from economics and policymakers talking about the fact that we're now at a global peak of an all-time peak in levels of conflict, et cetera. We find that that's not really true. It's true only if you measure wars by a metric which is used now in academic circles that I find very unsatisfying, which is wars that kill more than 25 people a year. That's a fundamentally different thing … DEWS: 25? JONES: 25 people a year. That's the threshold that is used now versus some years 3 ago [when] it was more conventional to use a thousand battle deaths a year as a threshold. And in this paper and in the academic literature we use 10,000 battle deaths as a threshold for major wars. When you look at major wars there is a slight increase in the number of them. There's not a large increase in the number of them. And so that's a very different way of looking at things than to say, oh we’re at some sort of all-time peak in the numbers of conflict in the world. I think that's distorting. What is the case is that the wars in Syria, Yemen, and Afghanistan are killing an awful lot of people, and particularly in Syria. And the number of battle deaths and the number of civilian deaths in those wars are very high. They're not higher than wars in, you know, the early 90s, the genocide in Rwanda, battle deaths in Angola, et cetera. But they are very high. And after roughly a 20 year period of continuous decline, it is a striking reversal. DEWS: Is there anything that ties together that increase in battle deaths in those three countries in the region? You mention the Middle East, Syria, Yemen, and Afghanistan. Why is it happening in those areas of the world? JONES: Well I think there are two reasons. First of all Afghanistan has its own particular trajectory and has actually been in a war for more or less three decades, for a full decade before we intervened militarily it was struggling with a range of forms of violence and oppression and terrorism. Syria, Yemen, Libya, some of the other cases, these are all manifestations of the Arab Spring and the backlash to the Arab Spring, breakdown of regional order, breakdown of social order within the region. I think what's particular about that region is that unlike, say, conflicts in sub-Saharan Africa or Latin America or the fringes of East Asia, it's much more difficult in the Middle East for international actors to come together to help to try to resolve those conflicts because the region simply plays a much weightier role in geopolitical affairs than does, say, sub-Saharan Africa or Latin America. Oil interests, security interests, democratic interests, aligned interests, all mean that the United States, Russians and others have very 4 significant interests in these states. And so they don't view the conflicts through the prism of how can we stop the violence against civilians; they view the conflict through the prism of their strategic interests. And so rather than working together through the Council or through a regional organization to try to resolve these wars, rather, we and others have been trying to make sure our side wins or make sure that we see an outcome that's aligned with our interests. And that's fueling these wars. Second point to make is that these are states with large, capable armies and large, capable states. They've been deteriorated through the course of violence. But, for example, in thinking about potentially responding to the Syrian civil war, you had to contend with the fact that Assad had a 500,000 strong army. That's a serious fighting force, whatever their degree of capability. So you can't just roll up with a few U.N. peacekeepers and take care of them like that. They're much, much tougher problems. DEWS: And now we have seen Russian military involvement in Syria which leads me to segue to Russia and its involvement in Ukraine and Crimea. I guess we could track back to Georgia, even in other places in Central Asia. You talk about how those kinds of conflicts are changing the global security picture. JONES: Yeah, we're seeing a return to a phenomenon that we were very familiar with during the Cold War, namely proxy wars involving the great powers. Almost all civil wars or proxy wars in one form or another, i.e. local combatants, the government itself have some support from neighbors or external parties, but it's a very different thing when that external party is a major military power. And so when either we or the Russians or somebody of that scale decides to lend support—financial, military advice, weapons, or direct deployments to one side of the conflict or another—it becomes a much, much more difficult proposition to resolve. And what we know from the Cold War is that proxy wars can last literally for decades. In a civil war, there are some finite level of resources or some finite level of pain the society can suffer and the pressures mount to resolve the situation. 5 But when you're fueling those wars through the flow of weapons and money and sometimes people, then they can extend essentially indefinitely. And I worry greatly that we're moving back into a phase of that kind of proxy warfare: huge human cost and cost to the relations between the powers.
Recommended publications
  • From "The Hunger Games" Soundtrack) Mp3, Flac, Wma
    Taylor Swift Safe & Sound (From "The Hunger Games" Soundtrack) mp3, flac, wma DOWNLOAD LINKS (Clickable) Genre: Folk, World, & Country / Stage & Screen Album: Safe & Sound (From "The Hunger Games" Soundtrack) Country: North America (inc Mexico) Released: 2011 Style: Folk, Soundtrack MP3 version RAR size: 1466 mb FLAC version RAR size: 1992 mb WMA version RAR size: 1824 mb Rating: 4.1 Votes: 947 Other Formats: DTS VQF MP1 AC3 AU MP4 MP3 Tracklist 1 Safe & Sound (From "The Hunger Games" Soundtrack) 4:01 Companies, etc. Phonographic Copyright (p) – Big Machine Records, LLC Credits Featuring – The Civil Wars Written-By – John Paul White, Joy Williams , T Bone Burnett*, Taylor Swift Notes As presented on the iTunes download page: ℗ 2011 Big Machine Records, LLC Barcode and Other Identifiers Other (iTunes ID): id490735511 Other versions Category Artist Title (Format) Label Category Country Year Taylor Swift Featuring The Taylor Swift Civil Wars - Safe & Sound Def Jam none Featuring The (From 'The Hunger Games' Recordings, none UK 2012 Civil Wars Soundtrack) (CDr, Single, Mercury Promo) Taylor Swift Featuring The Taylor Swift Civil Wars - Safe & Sound Mercury, Def Jam none Featuring The (From "The Hunger Games" none UK 2012 Recordings Civil Wars Soundtrack) (CDr, Single, Promo) Taylor Swift Featuring The Taylor Swift Civil Wars - Safe & Sound Universal Republic none Featuring The (From "The Hunger Games" Records , Big none 2012 Civil Wars Soundtrack) (CDr, Single, Machine Records Unofficial) Taylor Swift Featuring The Taylor Swift Civil Wars - Safe & Sound Lions Gate none Featuring The (From "The Hunger Games" none US 2012 Entertainment Inc. Civil Wars Soundtrack) (CDr, Single, Promo, For) Related Music albums to Safe & Sound (From "The Hunger Games" Soundtrack) by Taylor Swift Various - The Hunger Games (Songs From District 12 And Beyond) Taylor Swift - Wonderland Taylor Swift Featuring Ed Sheeran - Everything Has Changed Taylor Swift - Bad Blood The Civil Wars - Tracks In The Snow Taylor Swift - Mean Civil Wars, The - Live at Eddie's Attic Taylor Swift Feat.
    [Show full text]
  • How Civil Wars End Lise Morjé Howard and the International System, Norms, and the Alexandra Stark Role of External Actors
    How Civil Wars End How Civil Wars End Lise Morjé Howard and The International System, Norms, and the Alexandra Stark Role of External Actors Historically, civil wars were fought to the ªnish, with the complete military defeat of the losing side.1 But in the 1990s, as this article demonstrates, civil wars were more likely to end in negotiated settlements rather than victory by one side. Why? We argue that civil wars began to end in this historically distinct manner because of a fundamental change in the international norms of conºict resolution—namely, the rise of a norm of negotiated settlement. This norm arose in the context of a new international political environment dominated by U.S. unipolarity and liberal democracy; the ideas and principles of the liberal order undermined the acceptability of military victory. In the post–September 11 environment characterized by the war on terror- ism, however, the norm of negotiated settlement has been challenged by countervailing notions of appropriateness—namely, stabilization over democ- ratization and non-negotiation with terrorist groups. As a result, civil wars are ending less frequently, and less often in negotiation. The dominant inter- national political environment shapes norms of conºict resolution, which, in turn, inºuence how civil wars end. Lise Morjé Howard is Associate Professor and Alexandra Stark is a Ph.D. candidate, both in the Depart- ment of Government at Georgetown University. For helpful comments and suggestions, the authors thank Michael Barnett, Chester Crocker, Kathleen Gallagher Cunningham, Christian Davenport, Anjali Kaushlesh Dayal, Tanisha Fazal, V. Page Fortna, Desha Girod, Caroline Hartzell, Ron Hassner, Stathis Kalyvas, Luke Keele, Joachim Kreutz, Kathleen McNamara, Stephen Moncrief, Daniel Nexon, Ragnhild Nordås, Patrick Regan, Thomas Risse, Elizabeth Saunders, Megan Stewart, James Vreeland, Elizabeth Wood, and the anonymous reviewers.
    [Show full text]
  • The English Civil Wars a Beginner’S Guide
    The English Civil Wars A Beginner’s Guide Patrick Little A Oneworld Paperback Original Published in North America, Great Britain and Australia by Oneworld Publications, 2014 Copyright © Patrick Little 2014 The moral right of Patrick Little to be identified as the Author of this work has been asserted by him/her in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 All rights reserved Copyright under Berne Convention A CIP record for this title is available from the British Library ISBN 9781780743318 eISBN 9781780743325 Typeset by Siliconchips Services Ltd, UK Printed and bound in Denmark by Nørhaven A/S Oneworld Publications 10 Bloomsbury Street London WC1B 3SR England Stay up to date with the latest books, special offers, and exclusive content from Oneworld with our monthly newsletter Sign up on our website www.oneworld-publications.com Contents Preface vii Map of the English Civil Wars, 1642–51 ix 1 The outbreak of war 1 2 ‘This war without an enemy’: the first civil war, 1642–6 17 3 The search for settlement, 1646–9 34 4 The commonwealth, 1649–51 48 5 The armies 66 6 The generals 82 7 Politics 98 8 Religion 113 9 War and society 126 10 Legacy 141 Timeline 150 Further reading 153 Index 157 Preface In writing this book, I had two primary aims. The first was to produce a concise, accessible account of the conflicts collectively known as the English Civil Wars. The second was to try to give the reader some idea of what it was like to live through that trau- matic episode.
    [Show full text]
  • Original Vs Cover
    Original vs Cover Task: To listen to or watch pieces of music in their original form, and performed as a cover version. To compare the versions using musical language and give an informed opinion. Use the table with the keywords on in your Music review work. To present your work as a ● Powerpoint ● Video ● Poster or Collage ● Podcast Dynamics The volume (how loud or soft the music is) Rhythm The movement of notes around the pulse Tempo The speed of the music Structure How the music is put together Melody The main tune Instruments/Timbre/ What is making the sound- how and why sonority Texture How many layers the music has- for what purpose are they there? Any points of interest Which do you prefer and why? Use musical keywords to explain this There are lots of cover versions on the BBC Live Lounge youtube channel. Here are 10 examples to get you going: Song title Original Cover King Years & Years Carly Rae Jepsen https://www.youtube.com/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v watch?v=g_uoH6hJilc =lhF8ZWvw_8s Sound of Silence Simon & Garfunkel Disturbed https://www.youtube.com/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v watch?v=f7McpVPlidc =u9Dg-g7t2l4 Crazy Gnarls Barkley Ray Lamontagne https://www.youtube.com/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v watch?v=-N4jf6rtyuw =6mEfDSP4g_U&list=PLD71ADF6 DDA9D2466&index=7 Billie Jean Michael Jackson The Civil Wars https://www.youtube.com/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v watch?v=Zi_XLOBDo_Y =441mR2zsQbg&list=PLD71ADF6 DDA9D2466&index=16 Wonderwall Oasis Ed Sheeran https://www.youtube.com/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v
    [Show full text]
  • Three Narratives of Civil War: Recurrence, Remembrance and Reform from Sulla to Syria†
    Three Narratives of Civil War: Recurrence, Remembrance and Reform from Sulla to Syria† DAVID ARMITAGE Department of History, Harvard University For most of their history, from the ancient world until the nineteenth century, civil wars were a subject primarily for orators, poets, historians and novelists. They have been of pressing concern to lawyers for barely a hundred and fifty years, for social scientists only since the 1960s and for literary scholars mostly during the twenty-first century. Civil wars have accordingly been absent from social theory and from interdisciplinary study more generally: there is as yet no great treatise on civil war to sit alongside Clausewitz’s On War or Arendt’s On Revolution, for example.1 Civil War and Narrative is therefore especially welcome for joining fields that have been put asunder and for bringing practitioners and scholars together to examine the centrality of narratives to experiences of civil war from the mid-seventeenth century to contemporary Rwanda and South Sudan, among other locales torn by civil war. I have argued elsewhere that the experience of civil war—the efforts to understand it, to ameliorate it and even to prevent it—have shaped conceptions of community, authority and sovereignty and continue to inform them to this day. Without the challenge of civil war, I contend, our conceptions of politics, sovereignty, revolution, international law, cosmopolitanism and globalisation would have been very different, even poorer.2 Indeed, civil war may have done more than war to shape our conceptions of politics—“the continuation of civil war,” in Foucault’s teasing revision of Clausewitz—than war itself.3 † This essay has benefited from the comments of audiences in London, Berlin, New Haven and Athens.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Water Stress in Instability and Conflict
    THE ROLE OF WATER STRESS IN INSTABILITY AND CONFLICT December 2017 UNLIMITED DISTRIBUTION Cover Image: Violent protest in Bolivia over government increases to the cost of water. Recommended Citation: CNA. 2017. The Role of Water Stress in Instability and Conflict. CRM-2017-U-016532. Final. CNA is a not-for-profit research and analysis organization dedicated to developing actionable solutions to complex problems of national importance. Approved for Unlimited Distribution Cheryl B. Rosenblum Executive Director, CNA Military Advisory Board Copyright© 2017 CNA THE ROLE OF WATER STRESS IN INSTABILITY AND CONFLICT To the reader: As senior military officers, we see water stress—the lack of adequate fresh water—as a growing factor in the world’s hot spots and conflict areas, many of vital interest to the United States. Our earlier reports have identified a nexus among climate, water, energy, and U.S. national security. We have previously shown how emerging resource scarcity across this nexus can be a threat multiplier and an accelerant of instability. With escalating global population and the impact of a changing climate, we see the challenges of water stress rising with time. It is in this context that we now seek to provide a better understanding of the mechanisms through which water factors into violence and conflict. This report examines the role of water across a spectrum from civil unrest and localized violence to terrorism, insurgencies, and civil wars to state-on- state conflict. Focusing on water-stressed areas of the world, it articulates the role water plays not only in diplomacy, violence, and conflict, but also how water can be used as a tool of coercion across the spectrum of conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Non Blondes
    4 Non Blondes - Whats Up The Civil Wars - Billie Jean Alanis Morissette - Mary Jane The Cranberries - Zombie Alanis Morissette - Not The Doctor The Everly Brothers - Oh So Many Years Alanis Morissette - You Oughta Know The Four Seasons - December, 1963 (Oh What A Amy Winehouse - Valerie Night) Beyoncé - Crazy In Love The Jackson 5 - I Want You Back Britney Spears - Baby One More Time The Killers - Mr Brightside Chris Stapleton - Tennessee Whiskey The Lumineers - Ho Hey Counting Crows - Accidentally In Love The Outfield - Your Love Counting Crows - Mr Jones Vulfpeck - Back Pocket Acoustic Deep Blue Something - Breakfast At Tiffany’s Whitney Houston - I Wanna Dance With Elle King - Exs And Ohs Somebody Elton John - Rocket Man Eva Cassidy - It Doesn’t Matter Anymore Fastball - The Way Fleetwood Mac - Go Your Own Way George Michael - Faith Gloria Gaynor - I Will Survive Goo Goo Dolls - Slide Grateful Dead - Playing In The Band Harvey Danger - Flagpole Sitta Janis Joplin - Me And Bobby Mcgee John Mayer - Why Georgia Kacey Musgrave - Butterflies Katrina and the Waves - Walking On Sunshine Lady Gaga and Bradley Cooper - A Star Is Born Lucius - Dusty Trails MGMT - Time To Pretend Maggie Rogers - Light On Maroon 5 - Sunday Morning Matchbox Twenty - 3Am Michael Jackson - The Way You Make Me Feel Natalie Imbruglia - Torn No Doubt - Spiderwebs Oasis - Don’t Look Back In Anger Owl City - Fireflies Paramore - Ain’t It Fun Portugal. The Man - Feel It Still Robert Plant - Killing The Blues Shania Twain - Man I Feel Like A Woman Spice Girls - Wannabe The Beatles - All My Loving The Beatles - Penny Lane The Beatles - Two Of Us The Beatles - We Can Work It Out .
    [Show full text]
  • The English Civil Wars: Whose Side Are You On? Contents Teachers Notes 2 Document: John Rushworth, Historical Collections, Vol III, 1639-1640, P.1263
    Learning Curve Learning Curve Education Service Workshops Key Stage 3 The English Civil Wars: Whose side are you on? Contents Teachers notes 2 Document: John Rushworth, Historical Collections, Vol III, 1639-1640, p.1263. Published in London 5 A petition from the citizens of London, September 1640 Transcript 6 Document: SP 16/ 427/ 32 8 A legal complaint made by Sir Richard Strode about ‘ship money’, August 1639 Transcript 9 Document: by permission of the British Library, E.365 (6) 10 An engraving of a protest in Edinburgh in 1637 Transcript 10 Document: SP 45/ 10/ 225 11 An announcement from Charles to the people of Scotland, May 1639 Transcript 12 Document: SP 16/ 485/ 58 13 Report of rebellion in Ireland, November 1641 Transcript 14 Document: SP 16/ 474/ 15 A document setting out the wishes of Parliament, December 1640 Transcript 16 Document: SP 16/ 488/ 25 17 Charles’ I speech to Parliament demanding the five MPs but they have withdrawn, 4th January 1642 Transcript 18 Document: SP 16/ 474/ 8 20 A committee considering the safety of the kingdom after the arrest of the 5 members; it is a printed leaflet from parliament, 12th January 1642 Transcript 21 Worksheet 23 Learning Curve Education Service Workshops The English Civil Wars: whose side are you on? Teacher’s notes Aims of workshop: This videoconference aims to help students investigate and understand the causes of the English Civil Wars. Students will take part in a debate with actors playing the roles of Puritan Adam Wright and Royalist Bishop Richard Hyde, to discuss the different views of the causes behind these events.
    [Show full text]
  • Ending Civil Wars: Ending Civil Wars: Tanisha M
    on the horizon: Dædalus Unfolding Futures: Indigenous Ways of Knowing for the Twenty-First Century edited by Ned Blackhawk, K. Tsianina Lomawaima, Bryan McKinley Jones Brayboy, Philip J. Deloria, Loren Ghiglione, Douglas Medin, and Mark Trahant Heidi Kiiwetinepinesiik Stark, Kekek Jason Stark, Amy E. Den Ouden, Rosita Kaaháni Worl, Heather Kendall-Miller, Noelani Goodyear-Ka’ōpua, Winter 2018 Ending Civil Wars : Constraints & Possibilities : Constraints Winter 2018 Ending Civil Wars Bryan Kamaoli Kuwada, Nanibaa’ Garrison, Dædalus Arianne E. Eason, Laura M. Brady, Stephanie Fryberg, Cherly Crazy Bull, Justin Guillory, Gary Sandefur, Journal of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences Kyle Powys Whyte, Megan Bang, Ananda Marin, Winter 2018 Teresa McCarty, Sheila E. Nicholas, Kari A. B. Chew, Natalie G. Diaz, Wesley Y. Leonard, and Louellyn White Anti-Corruption: Best Practices Ending Civil Wars: edited by Robert I. Rotberg Constraints & Possibilities Science & the Legal System edited by Shari Diamond and Richard Lempert Karl Eikenberry & Stephen D. Krasner, guest editors with Francis Fukuyama Tanisha M. Fazal · Stathis N. Kalyvas Charles T. Call & Susanna P. Campbell · Lyse Doucet Thomas Risse & Eric Stollenwerk · Clare Lockhart Representing the intellectual community in its breadth Tanja A. Börzel & Sonja Grimm · Steven Heydemann and diversity, Dædalus explores the frontiers of Seyoum Mesfi n & Abdeta Dribssa Beyene knowledge and issues of public importance. Nancy E. Lindborg & J. Joseph Hewitt Richard Gowan & Stephen John Stedman Sumit Ganguly · Jean-Marie Guéhenno U.S. $15; www.amacad.org; @americanacad Dædalus Journal of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences “Ending Civil Wars: Constraints & Possibilities” Volume 147, Number 1; Winter 2018 Karl Eikenberry & Stephen D.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Blake Setlist
    MICHAEL BLAKE SETLIST Here is a list of most the songs Michael knows and can play live. This list is not everything, so feel free to reach out and check on a song if you have a special one in mind. He may already know it or be willing to learn it. We do charge a $50 song fee for the time spent learning a new song. Pop/Rock/Folk/Jazz: 1234 Feist A Long December Counting Crows A Warning Sign Coldplay A Sunday Kind of Love Etta James A Thousand Years Christina Perri (Twilight Soundtrack) All of Me John Legend All of Me Billie Holiday All I Want Is You Barry Louis Polisar (Juno Soundtrack) All I Want Is You U2 All This Time Sting All You Need Is Love – The Beatles Always On My Mind Willie Nelson Amy Ryan Adams And I Love Her The Beatles And It Stoned Me – Van Morrison Another Sunday Night – Sam Cooke, Cat Stevens At Last Etta James Babylon David Gray Bad Bad Leroy Brown Jim Croce Bad Blood Taylor Swift Between The Bars Elliot Smith Blackbird The Beatles Blue The Jayhawks Brighter Than Sunshine Aqualung Brown Eyed Girl Van Morrison By Your Side Sade Can’t Keep It In Cat Stevens Calico Skies Paul McCartney Carolina In My Mind James Taylor Come Away With Me Norah Jones Come Pick Me Up Ryan Adams Coming Home Leon Bridges Country Comfort Elton John Country Roads – John Denver Crazy Love Van Morrison Don’t Dream It’s Over Crowded House Don't Know Why Norah Jones Don't Think Twice It's All Right Bob Dylan Easy Like Sunday Morning Lionel Ritchie/Commodores Emmylou - First Aid Kit Every Little Thing She Does Is Magic The Police Fade Into You Mazzy
    [Show full text]
  • Using Twitter to Promote Civic Education Katelyn Ross University of Maine at Farmington
    Masthead Logo Scholar Works M.S.Ed. in Educational Leadership Research Graduate Works Projects 2016 Using Twitter to Promote Civic Education Katelyn Ross University of Maine at Farmington Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umf.maine.edu/ed_leadership_projects Part of the Educational Leadership Commons Recommended Citation Ross, Katelyn, "Using Twitter to Promote Civic Education" (2016). M.S.Ed. in Educational Leadership Research Projects. 37. https://scholarworks.umf.maine.edu/ed_leadership_projects/37 This Research Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Works at Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in M.S.Ed. in Educational Leadership Research Projects by an authorized administrator of Scholar Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. USING TWITTER TO ENGAGE IN CIVIC EDUCATION !1 Creating Democratic Citizens: Using Twitter to Engage in Civic Education Katelyn Ross Maine Regional School Unit #3 University of Maine at Farmington Katelyn Ross is a graduate of the University of Maine at Farmington. She has been teaching at Mount View High School for seven years. Recently, she finished her Masters Degree at the University of Maine at Farmington in the Educational Leadership program. Katelyn Ross can be reached at [email protected]. USING TWITTER TO ENGAGE IN CIVIC EDUCATION !2 Table of Contents Abstract… page 3 Introduction… pages 5-6 Literature Review… pages 6-9 Research Design… pages 9-13 Research Methods… pages 14-20 Research Narrative… pages 20-24 Data Analysis and Interpretation of Findings… pages 25-32 Discussion… pages 32-35 Personal Learning Reflection… pages 35-37 References… pages 38-40 Appendices… pages 41-48 USING TWITTER TO ENGAGE IN CIVIC EDUCATION !3 Creating democratic citizens: Using Twitter to engage in civic education Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate how Twitter could be used to support civic education in a rural, low-income school district in Maine.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 CIVIL WARS and REFUGEES Why Do Some Civil Wars Generate More
    CIVIL WARS AND REFUGEES Why do Some Civil Wars Generate More Refugees than Others? Oguzhan Turkoglu1 The causes of refugee migration are an under-researched topic in social sciences. Even though there are a few quantitative studies on the general causes of refugee migration, the number of studies which specifically analyze the relationship between the civil wars and refugees is very limited. This study sets out to analyze why some civil wars generate more refugees than others and focuses on the geographical aspects and the location of the country in which the civil war takes place. This study examines the relationship between civil wars and refugees through a large-n analysis that covers the civil wars between 1964 and 2014. Keywords: civil war, refugees, location, border, coastline border Civil wars are the most common type of conflict in the last century and they affect almost every part of daily life. In addition, their detrimental effects are not limited to countries which experience the civil war but exceed national borders and impact regional and global stability and security. One of the negative consequences of civil wars is to displace people, both internally and externally. Moreover, there is a quite broad range for the number of displaced people by civil wars. While some civil wars generate hundreds of displaced people, others generate millions of displaced people. In this study, I will look at the relationship between refugee migration and civil wars and try to answer the question of why some civil wars generate more refugees than others through a large-n analysis which covers civil wars between 1964 and 2014.
    [Show full text]