Conspiracy Theory and Conspiracism in Postwar Literature a Dissertation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Conspiracy Theory and Conspiracism in Postwar Literature a Dissertation Conspiracy Theory and Conspiracism in Postwar Literature A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Abdulrahman F. Abu Shal August 2020 © Copyright All rights reserved Except for previously published materials Dissertation written by Abdulrahman F. Abu Shal B.A., King Saud University, 2009 M.A., The University of Akron, 2014 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2020 Approved by _______________________________________, Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Tammy Clewell _______________________________________, Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Babacar M’Baye _______________________________________ Christopher Roman _______________________________________ Rekha Sharma _______________________________________ Patrick Gallagher Accepted by _______________________________________, Chair, Department of English Babacar M’Baye _______________________________________, Interim Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Mandy Munro-Stasiuk TABLE OF CONTENTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- v CHAPTERS I. INTRODUCTION -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 A Brief Analysis of Conspiracy Theory and Conspiracism --------------------------- 7 Defining Conspiracy Theory --------------------------------------------------- 10 Defining Conspiracism ---------------------------------------------------------- 13 The Problem with ‘the Paranoid Style’ --------------------------------------- 19 Trust and Distrust in Relation to Conspiracy Theory and Conspiracism ---------- 25 II. THE LIMITS OF CONSPIRACY THEORY IN PYNCHON’S THE CRYING OF LOT 49 AND GRAVITY’S RAINBOW ------------------------------------------------- 30 “Revelation in progress”: Oedipa’s Paranoia and Conspiracy Theory ------------ 37 Clues to the Conspiracy --------------------------------------------------------- 40 Correlations between Clues ----------------------------------------------------- 47 The Accumulation of Clues and Correlations -------------------------------- 50 Considerable Conclusions to Counter Conspiracism ------------------------ 55 “Operational paranoia”: Slothrop’s Experience -------------------------------------- 59 An Onion-Layered Conspiracy ------------------------------------------------- 61 The Discovery of Convoluted Conspiracies ---------------------------------- 64 Slothrop’s Proverbs for Paranoids --------------------------------------------- 67 The Compulsive Intuition to Discover Clues -------------------------------- 68 Confrontations, Confessions, and Confirmations ---------------------------- 72 Documents and Conspiracies --------------------------------------------------- 77 iii The “Plot” to Escape the Plot -------------------------------------------------- 80 Anti-Paranoia as a Possible Response to Paranoia -------------------------- 84 The Limitations of Conspiracy Theory ------------------------------------------------ 87 III. THE LIMITS OF CONSPIRACISM AND SECRECY IN REED’S MUMBO JUMBO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 91 Secrecy, Secret Societies, and the Conspiracy ---------------------------------------- 99 Secrecy and Political Control ------------------------------------------------- 106 Secrecy vs. Conspiracism: Misinformation and Misbelief ---------------- 110 Conspiracism and the Bias towards Secrecy ----------------------------------------- 117 IV. THE DILEMMA OF CONSPIRACISM IN ECO’S FOUCAULT’S PENDULUM 126 Critiquing Conspiracism and its Flawed Reasoning -------------------------------- 135 Debunking the Evidence: The Templars’ Coded Message ---------------- 136 The Plan: A Fabrication that Challenges the Truth Claim ----------------- 143 The Risks of Conspiracism and Believing Invented Meanings -------------------- 148 WORKS CITED ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 157 iv Acknowledgements ﷽ fgh Bismillah Ar-Rahman Ar-Rahim “In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.” First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor, Tammy Clewell, for her assistance and guidance, which made my journey as a doctoral student possible since day one. I would also like to thank Babacar M’Baye for his steadfast support throughout this journey. You both have left your lasting marks on my personality. Secondly, I would like to extend my thanks to Christopher Roman, Rekha Sharma, and Patrick Gallagher for your approval to be part of the dissertation committee and for dedicating your personal time and effort. I am truly indebted to each and every one of you. I am grateful to King Saud University for providing me with the opportunity and the scholarship to further my education and do this research. I am also thankful to Kent State University for being my home for years. I would like to extend my sincere gratitude to whoever did the disturbing The Arrivals series in 2008, my first genuine encounter with conspiracism. For my mother, Maimoonah, and my father, Faisal, who raised me to be who I am now but sadly passed away before they see this moment. I miss you so much. For my wife, Anhar, without your endless love and support, none of this would be possible. For my family and friends, whose encouragement helped me through the hardest moments in the United States. v I. Introduction In postwar literature, conspiracy theory manifests differently from one writer to another. The representation of conspiracy theory in literary works forms a spectrum on which writers can be viewed as either participating in its formation, ridiculing it, or positioning their works somewhere in between as they explore much more complex figurations of it. There are writers whose works show neither participation in nor a complete rejection of the conspiratorial narrative by taking a position that views conspiracy theory as a potential yet problematic tool of investigating conspiracies. Conspiracy theories occupy a significant portion of our daily lives. They constitute a multifaceted phenomenon, but they are often reduced to a particular aspect without considering the multiplicity of factors contributing to their existence. Sometimes they are rational; but most of the time, they may emerge from a stubborn worldview or a set of beliefs insinuating that history only unveils through conspiracies. There are distinctions between the two cases. In the first case, conspiracy theories can result from epistemological investigations that attempt to discover actual conspiracies. In the other case, they are connotative of the extreme socio-political view that conspiracies explain everything that happens. This is the distinction between conspiracy theory as an epistemological approach and what shall be called ‘conspiracism.’ The distinction between the two is necessary so that we may understand more about conspiracy theory as a useful tool in isolation from the perilous political worldview of conspiracism. The intricate and interconnected relations between conspiracy theory and conspiracism often result in confusion and misconception. To clarify the terminology from which to proceed, I 1 use the term ‘conspiracy theory’ in the singular form with no definite article to refer to an abstract epistemological approach that allows for the presumption that a particular event resulted from a conspiracy. The term ‘conspiracy theories’ in the plural form refers to actual existing theorized accounts (either rational or irrational) about the presence of conspiracies, whether contemporary or historical, such as the 9/11 conspiracy theories or the assassination of John F. Kennedy. Conspiracism refers to the pathological worldview or belief that everything can be explained and understood as resulting from a conspiracy. The two terms, conspiracy theory and conspiracism, are often conflated because they are both described as resulting from paranoia, a cultural condition. These terms require a more elaborate analysis to understand how they affect each other. The associations between conspiracy theory and conspiracism with paranoia are problematic in many aspects. First of all, there is the issue of paranoia as a concept. It is a clinical term that has entered the colloquial sphere of language to characterize someone’s irrational fear and suspicion that someone else secretly intends to harm them. It refers to a cultural condition explored in both fiction and academic works. Moreover, paranoia is very often used to describe the unjustified fear of conspiracies. This leads to the second issue this dissertation will address, which is the notion of belief in conspiracy theories as a form of paranoia. Whether conspiratorial claims are justified or not, they are often dismissed because they are perceived as paranoid. However, that perception to a certain extent is justified because irrational and unjustified belief in conspiracy theories may be the result of conspiracism, which leads to its conflation with rational conspiracy theories. Therefore, the third issue to be addressed is the lack of distinction between the rational use of conspiracy theory and the culture of conspiracism. By nuancing conspiracy theory as an epistemological method and conspiracism as 2 a worldview, it will be possible to perceive the former as a rational method and the latter as extremely irrational. The following discussions highlight the issues
Recommended publications
  • Hosting the 'Holohoax': a Snapshot of Holocaust Denial Across Social Media
    COVID-19 disinformation briefingISD Briefing No.2 HostingFar-right the m ‘Holohoax’obilisation 10th9th August April 2020 2020 COVIDHosting-19 the disinformation ‘Holohoax’: A Snapshotbriefing of Holocaust no. 2 Denial Across Social Media Far-rightJakob Guhl mobilisation & Jacob Davey This is the second in a series of briefings from ISD’s Digital Research Unit on the information ecosystem around coronavirus (COVID-19). These briefings expose how Executivetechnology platformsSummary are being used to promote disinformation, hate, extremism and authoritarianism in the context of COVID-19. It is based on ISD’s mixture of natural Overviewlanguage processing, network analysis and ethnographic online research. This briefing Holocaustfocuses denialon the has way long far-right been one groups of the most and insidious individuals conspiracy are mobilising theories targeting around Jewish COVID-19 in communities,the with US. its The extremist first proponents briefing drawnin the from series across can the be ideological found on spectrum, ISD’s website. from extreme right-wing to hard left to Islamist. Research has shown that digital platforms have only served to amplify and mainstream this warped strain of thinking inTop recent Lines years.1 Far-rightThis briefing groups paper andprovides individuals a snapshot are of Holocaust denialAntisemitic content acrossspeech major and social ideas media are beingplatforms. opportunisticallyBy analysing the term using ‘holohoax’, the ongoingwhich is commonly usedadapted by Holocaust to incorporate deniers,
    [Show full text]
  • The Analysis of Life Struggle in Andy Weir's
    THE ANALYSIS OF LIFE STRUGGLE IN ANDY WEIR‘S NOVEL THE MARTIAN A THESIS BY ALEMINA BR KABAN REG. NO. 140721012 DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH FACULTY OF CULTURAL STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF SUMATERA UTARA MEDAN 2018 UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA THE ANALYSIS OF LIFE STRUGGLE IN ANDY WEIR‘S NOVEL THE MARTIAN A THESIS BY ALEMINA BR KABAN REG. NO. 140721012 SUPERVISOR CO-SUPERVISOR Drs. Parlindungan Purba,M.Hum. Riko Andika Pohan, S.S., M.Hum. NIP.1963021619 89031003001 NIP. 1984060920150410010016026 Submitted to Faculty of Cultural Studies University of Sumatera Utara Medan in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Sarjana Sastra from Department of English DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH FACULTY OF CULTURAL STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF SUMATERA UTARA MEDAN 2018 UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA Approved by the Department of English, Faculty of Cultural Studies University of Sumatera Utara (USU) Medan as thesis for The Sarjana Sastra Examination. Head, Secretary, Prof. T.Silvana Sinar,Dipl.TEFL,MA.,Ph.D Rahmadsyah Rangkuti, M.A. Ph.D. NIP. 19571117 198303 2 002 NIP. 19750209 200812 1 002 UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA Accepted by the Board of Examiners in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Sarjana Sastra from the Department of English, Faculty of Cultural Studies University of Sumatera Utara, Medan. The examination is held in Department of English Faculty of Cultural Studies University of Sumatera Utara on July 6th, 2018 Dean of Faculty of Cultural Studies University of Sumatera Utara Dr. Budi Agustono, M.S. NIP.19600805 198703 1 001 Board of Examiners Rahmadsyah Rangkuti, M.A., Ph.D __________________ Drs. Parlindungan Purba, M.Hum.
    [Show full text]
  • What They Donâ•Žt Want You to Know About Planet X: Surviving 2012
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Communication Studies Faculty Publications Communication Studies 7-25-2014 What They Don’t Want You to Know About Planet X: Surviving 2012 and the Aesthetics of Conspiracy Rhetoric Ian Reyes University of Rhode Island, [email protected] Jason K. Smith Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/com_facpubs The University of Rhode Island Faculty have made this article openly available. Please let us know how Open Access to this research benefits you. This is a pre-publication author manuscript of the final, published article. Terms of Use This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable towards Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth in our Terms of Use. Citation/Publisher Attribution Reyes, Ian and Jason K. Smith. "What They Don't Want You to Know About Planet X: Surviving 2012 and the Aesthetics of Conspiracy Rhetoric." Communication Quarterly, vol. 62, no. 4, 2014, pp. 399-415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2014.922483. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2014.922483 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Communication Studies at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Communication Studies Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “What They Don’t Want You to Know About Planet X: Surviving 2012 and the Aesthetics of Conspiracy Rhetoric” Ian Reyes Department of Communication Studies Harrington School of Communication and Media University of Rhode Island Davis Hall Kingston, RI 02881 [email protected] Jason K.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University Schreyer Honors College
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH FEAR OF WORKING-CLASS AGENCY IN THE VICTORIAN INDUSTRIAL NOVEL ADAM BIVENS SPRING 2018 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in English with honors in English Reviewed and approved* by the following: Elizabeth Womack Assistant Professor of English Thesis Supervisor Paul deGategno Professor of English Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT This work examines the Victorian Industrial novel as a genre of literature that reflects the middle-class biases of influential authors like Charles Dickens and Elizabeth Gaskell, who cater to middle-class readers by simultaneously sympathizing with the poor and admonishing any efforts of the working class to express political agency that challenge the social order. As such, the Victorian Industrial novel routinely depicts trade unionism in a negative light as an ineffective means to secure socioeconomic gains that is often led by charismatic demagogues who manipulate naïve working people to engage in violent practices with the purpose of intimidating workers. The Victorian Industrial novel also acts as an agent of reactionary politics, reinforcing fears of mob violence and the looming threat of revolutionary uprising in England as had occurred throughout Europe in 1848. The novels display a stubborn refusal to link social ills to their material causes, opting instead to endorse temporary and idealist solutions like paternalism, liberal reformism, and marriage between class members as panaceæ for class antagonisms, thereby decontextualizing the root of the problem through the implication that all poor relations between the worker and employer, the proletariat and the bourgeoisie, can be attributed to a breakdown in communication and understanding.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching Aid 4: Challenging Conspiracy Theories
    Challenging Conspiracy Theories Teaching Aid 4 1. Increasing Knowledge about Jews and Judaism 2. Overcoming Unconscious Biases 3. Addressing Anti-Semitic Stereotypes and Prejudice 4. Challenging Conspiracy Theories 5. Teaching about Anti-Semitism through Holocaust Education 6. Addressing Holocaust Denial, Distortion and Trivialization 7. Anti-Semitism and National Memory Discourse 8. Dealing with Anti-Semitic Incidents 9. Dealing with Online Anti-Semitism 10. Anti-Semitism and the Situation in the Middle East What is a conspiracy Challenging theory? “A belief that some covert but Conspiracy influential organization is re- sponsible for an unexplained Theories event.” SOURCE: Concise Oxford Eng- lish Dictionary, ninth edition The world is full of challenging Such explanatory models reject of conspiracy theories presents complexities, one of which is accepted narratives, and official teachers with a challenge: to being able to identify fact from explanations are sometimes guide students to identify, con- fiction. People are inundated regarded as further evidence of front and refute such theories. with information from family, the conspiracy. Conspiracy the- friends, community and online ories build on distrust of estab- This teaching aid will look at sources. Political, economic, cul- lished institutions and process- how conspiracy theories func- tural and other forces shape the es, and often implicate groups tion, how they may relate to narratives we are exposed to that are associated with nega- anti-Semitism, and outline daily, and hidden
    [Show full text]
  • Free Speech and the Regulation of Lies Lyrissa Lidsky University of Missouri School of Law, [email protected]
    University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications 2008 Where's the Harm?: Free Speech and the Regulation of Lies Lyrissa Lidsky University of Missouri School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/facpubs Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the First Amendment Commons Recommended Citation Lidsky, Lyrissa Barnett, Where's the Harm?: Free Speech and the Regulation of Lies, 65 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1091 (2008). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. Where's the Harm?: Free Speech and the Regulation of Lies Lyrissa Bamett Lidsky* Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................ 1091 II. The H arm of D enial .................................................................... 1092 III. A Breathing Space for Lies? ....................................................... 1095 IV. Unintended Consequences of Regulation in the Internet Age .... 1099 V . C onclusion .................................................................................. 110 1 I. Introduction False factual information has no First Amendment value,' and yet the United States Supreme Court has accorded lies a measure of First Amendment protection.2 The First Amendment imposes something in the nature of a * Professor of Law, University of Florida Levin College of Law. The author thanks David A. Anderson, Ron Krotoszynski, Jr., Michael Siebecker, and all of the participants inthe University of Louisville's First Amendment Discussion Forum for their helpful suggestions. Please email the author at [email protected] with comments or questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Danilo Kiš's Fictionalization of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion
    “The Conspiracy, or The Roots of the Disintegration of European Society.” Danilo Kiš’s Fictionalization of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion Dagmar Burkhart Keywords Danilo Kiš; collective memory; thanatopoetics; conspiracy; Book of Kings and Fools; Protocols of the (Learned) Elders of Zion; pogroms Conspiracies have probably been a part of life ever since societies started to be- come more complex and at a time when those in power developed conflicting in- terests. The basic, literal meaning of the verb conspire (from the Latin conspira- re and its derivative, conspiratio, “agreement, union, unanimity”) is “to breathe together,” whereby breathing together was taken to mean “to agree, to concur to one end,” whether that purpose be good or evil (e.g. Genesis 37,18; “They con- spired against [Joseph] to slay him”). Since the middle of the fourteenth century conspiracy has been used in English to mean, first and foremost, “a plotting of evil, unlawful design; a combination of persons for an evil purpose.” The word conspire has, thus, assumed primarily negative connotations: “to secretly plot or make plans together, often with the intention to bring bad or illegal results.”1 Most conspiracy theories are generated in times of crisis. They occupy the space between political constellations and psychological mechanisms. They have much in common with paranoia: the loss of one’s ability to put things into per- spective, a static perception, the narrowed outlook of an extremely egocentric or 1 See “conspire” in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/con- spire 314 | Burkhart group-driven point of view.2 One of the conspiracy theories that has been most relevant in building an enemy stereotype is based on anti-Semitism, which sup- plied the greatest impetus for the persecution of Jews and legitimated the use of violence against them.
    [Show full text]
  • What Will It Mean to Us Today in 2015? (C) Copyright 2015 by Gil Carlson
    What will it mean to us today in 2015? (C) Copyright 2015 by Gil Carlson Wicked Wolf Press Email: [email protected] To discover the rest of the books in this Blue Planet Project Series: www.blue-planet-project.com/ What Awaits You Inside …….3 What is Nibiru? …….5 Orbit of Nibiru …….10 The Tablets of the Anunnaki …….11 Early hints of Nibiru nearing our Galaxy? …….32 Here’s the background on Nibiru …….38 Who are the Anunnaki? …….41 IS Nibiru INHABITED? …….42 Have Scientists Admitted that Nibiru Exists? …….44 When Will Nibiru Get Here? …….44 Likelihood of a Pole-Shift …….49 Biblical events in Relation to Nibiru …….51 When Will Nibiru Get Here? From Scientists …….52 When Will Nibiru Get Here? From Psychics …….69 The Orbit of Planet Nibiru …….71 What are Astronomers Seeing Now? …….76 Are Our Astronomers Being Silenced? …….81 Astronomer Harrington …….83 Interview with Dr. Rand on Nibiru …….86 The Nibiru Orbit and the Pole Shift …….88 Latest Scientific Evidence on Nibiru …….89 What Earth Changes will Nibiru Cause? …….93 Surviving the Pole-Shift Event …….94 Your Personal Disaster Preparations …….96 Government Preparations for Nibiru …….103 Comments …….103 Message from the Anunnaki …….108 Is Nibiru just a Hoax? …….113 Planet X Cover-up in Mainstream Media …….118 Nibiru 2015 - Page 2 What Awaits You Inside... Oh no, not another Nibiru book! Yes, my friend, it is here, hot off the presses. I too have been extremely interested in the concept of a Planet X, but there just isn’t enough current information in print that accurately applies to what is happening today.
    [Show full text]
  • Conspiracy Theories As Superstition: Today’S Mirror Image in Spinoza’S Tractatus Theologico-Politicus
    philosophies Article Conspiracy Theories as Superstition: Today’s Mirror Image in Spinoza’s Tractatus Theologico-Politicus Jamie van der Klaauw Erasmus School of Philosophy, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3062 PA Rotterdam, the Netherlands; [email protected] Abstract: The contention in this paper is that the theological-political disputes Spinoza was con- cerned with 350 years ago are similar to the conspiratorial disputes we experience today. The world in Spinoza’s Tractatus theologico-politicus, a political intervention in his time, serves as a “mir- ror image”, that is to say, it deals with the same problem we face today albeit in a different mode. Understanding our contemporary condition under the auspices of a Spinozist perspective, problems in countermeasures to the conspiratorial disputes come to light. Scholarly work and practice focus on the epistemological dimension of conspiracy theories, tying in the extent to which they are problematic to the degree in which they deal in untruth. However, the lesson from Spinoza’s analysis of the theological-political disputes is that such theories do not deal in truth, but, in affect, they do not spring from a lack of education but a lack of certainty. The work of Spinoza opens up a different approach, and if our aim is like that of the TTP, to defend political life against the threat of civil war, such a different approach is in order. Keywords: conspiracy theory; political affect; superstition; Spinoza; tractatus theologico-politicus Citation: van der Klaauw, J. Conspiracy Theories as Superstition: Today’s Mirror Image in Spinoza’s For I have shown that Scripture does not teach things through their proximate causes, Tractatus Theologico-Politicus.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of Conspiracy and Terror in the Works of Don Delillo
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University English Theses Department of English Spring 5-7-2011 For the Future: An Examination of Conspiracy and Terror in the Works of Don Delillo Ashleigh Whelan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/english_theses Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Whelan, Ashleigh, "For the Future: An Examination of Conspiracy and Terror in the Works of Don Delillo." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2011. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/english_theses/104 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of English at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in English Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FOR THE FUTURE: AN EXAMINATION OF CONSPIRACY AND TERROR IN THE WORKS OF DON DELILLO by ASHLEIGH WHELAN Under the Direction of Dr. Christopher Kocela ABSTRACT This thesis is divided into two chapters, the first being an examination of conspiracy and paranoia in Libra, while the second focuses on the relationship between art and terror in Mao II, “In the Ruins of the Future,” Falling Man, and Point Omega. The study traces how DeLillo’s works have evolved over the years, focusing on the creation of counternarratives. Readers are given a glimpse of American culture and shown the power of narrative, ultimately shedding light on the future of our collective consciousness. INDEX
    [Show full text]
  • D:\Downloads\Animorphs\Docs\K. A. Applegate
    1 Animorphs Volume 04 The Message K.A. Applegate *Converted to EBook by Dace K 2 Chapter 1 M y name is Cassie. I can't tell you my last name. I wish I could. But I can't even tell you what town I live in or what state. We have to disguise our identities, we Animorphs. It's not about being shy. It's about staying alive. If the Yeerks ever learn who we are, we'll be done for. If they don't kill us outright, they'll make us Controllers. They'll force a Yeerk slug into our brains, where it will take control of us, making us slaves - tools of the Yeerk invasion of Earth. And I really don't like the idea of being under the control of an alien. I don't like the idea of being dead, either. On the other hand, there are some things I do like about being an Animorph. Some very cool things. Take the other night. It was late. I should have been in bed. Instead I was in the barn, get ting ready to turn into a squirrel. Technically, the barn is really the Wildlife Re habilitation Clinic. My dad is a vet. So is my mom, but she works at The Gardens, this big zoo. The Wildlife Rehabilitation Clinic is just my dad and me. We take in injured birds and animals and try to save them, then release them back into their natural habitats. That's where I was. In the barn. Surrounded by dozens of cages full of birds, from a mourning dove who'd run into a car windshield to a golden eagle who'd almost been electrocuted by a power line.
    [Show full text]
  • 124214015 Full.Pdf
    PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI DEFENSE MECHANISM ADOPTED BY THE PROTAGONISTS AGAINST THE TERROR OF DEATH IN K.A APPLEGATE’S ANIMORPHS AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Sarjana Sastra in English Letters By MIKAEL ARI WIBISONO Student Number: 124214015 ENGLISH LETTERS STUDY PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LETTERS FACULTY OF LETTERS SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA 2016 PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI DEFENSE MECHANISM ADOPTED BY THE PROTAGONISTS AGAINST THE TERROR OF DEATH IN K.A APPLEGATE’S ANIMORPHS AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Sarjana Sastra in English Letters By MIKAEL ARI WIBISONO Student Number: 124214015 ENGLISH LETTERS STUDY PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LETTERS FACULTY OF LETTERS SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA 2016 ii PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI A SarjanaSastra Undergraduate Thesis DEFENSE MECIIAMSM ADOPTED BY TITE AGAINST PROTAGOMSTS THE TERROR OT OTATTT IN K.A APPLEGATE'S AAUMORPHS By Mikael Ari Wibisono Student Number: lz4ll4}ls Defended before the Board of Examiners On August 25,2A16 and Declared Acceptable BOARD OF EXAMINERS Name Chairperson Dr. F.X. Siswadi, M.A. Secretary Dra. Sri Mulyani, M.A., ph.D / Member I Dr. F.X. Siswadi, M.A. Member2 Drs. HirmawanW[ianarkq M.Hum. Member 3 Elisa DwiWardani, S.S., M.Hum Yogyakarta, August 31 z}rc Faculty of Letters fr'.arrr s41 Dharma University s" -_# 1,ffi QG*l(tls srst*\. \ tQrtnR<{l
    [Show full text]