Dear Sir / Madam, Please Find Our Representations to the Main

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dear Sir / Madam, Please Find Our Representations to the Main From: To: PlanningPolicy Subject: Response to Main Modifications - Landray Land Representatives [NLP-DMS.FID332475] Date: 02 March 2020 15:41:43 Attachments: image001.png image002.png Representations to the Main Modifications on behalf of Landray Land Representatives 02-03-2020.pdf 2019-11-06 Fosseway_Midsomer Norton - transport representations - full.pdf 31278 Site NRAD005 Additional Information 08.11.19.pdf LAND191037 SCM-01 P1.pdf Dear Sir / Madam, Please find our representations to the Main Modifications attached on behalf of our clients the Landray Land Representatives. We also provide additional information in relation to proposed allocation MN3 which was previously submitted to the Council on the 8th November 2019 – we would be grateful if it could also be provided to the Inspector. This includes a transport note prepared by Miles White, a design layout for the site demonstrating capacity for circa 152 dwellings and a letter providing additional information regarding delivery. Kind regards, Jenny Jenny Mitter Associate Director Lichfields, The Quorum, Bond Street, Bristol BS1 3AE lichfields.uk This email is for the use of the addressee. It may contain information which is confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy, distribute or disseminate this email or attachments to anyone other than the addressee. If you receive this communication in error please advise us by telephone as soon as possible. Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners Limited is registered in England, no. 2778116. Our registered office is at 14 Regent's Wharf, All Saints Street, London N1 9RL. P Think of the environment. Please avoid printing this email unnecessarily. Planning Policy Mendip District Council Cannards Grave Road Shepton Mallet BA4 5BT SENT BY EMAIL Date: 02 March 2020 Our ref: 31278/01/AC/JMi/18266724v1 Your ref: Dear Sir / Madam, Local Plan Part II - Representations to the Main Modifications Our client, the Landray Land Representatives, have control of land allocated through Main Modification 62 (MM62) known as Land east of the A367 in Midsomer Norton. Our client supports the proposed allocation of the site for a minimum of 145 dwellings. Should the allocation be confirmed, it is intended to bring forward the development as quickly as possible. There has been significant interest in our client’s site to date from a number of the national housebuilders. If the site is allocated, our client would be keen to work with the Council to expedite the delivery of this site. Landray Land Representatives previously submitted an outline planning application on the site and while the majority of the technical reports prepared in relation to this application will require updating, it is considered that a new outline planning application could be submitted within 3-6 months. In our experience, submission of planning to first delivery should take circa 3 years for a site of this size and the site could be built out within 2-3 years. Alternatively, with an allocation, our client may choose to work with a housebuilder to bring forward a full planning application instead of an outline which would further expedite the planning process. In either scenario, it is considered that the site can make a meaningful contribution to the five year housing land supply within Mendip. In terms of capacity, a minimum of 145no. units is considered achievable. Thrive Architects prepared a layout for the site which was provided to the Council via email on 8th November 2019 which demonstrated that the site could comfortably accommodate 152no. dwellings. MM01 Landray Land Representatives support the Council’s intention to undertake a review of the Local Plan and for this new Plan to be submitted to the Planning Inspectorate within 3 years of commencement. The Local Plan Part 1 is now out of date and the Council is unable to demonstrate a 5 year housing land supply. It is therefore essential that the Council commence work on the Local Plan Review as soon as possible. It is hoped that the adoption of the Local Plan Part 2 can now be expedited to allow the Council to commence work on the new plan. Registered in England No. 2778116 Regulated by the RICS MM03, MM04, MM58 and the 505 Dwellings Background Paper Landray Land Representatives support the allocation of an additional 505 dwellings in the north east of the District, as set out in the Inspector’s Draft Schedule of Main Modifications. In order for the Plan to be found ‘sound’ these additional homes are required to be allocated in the north east of the District, in addition to the 9,635 allocated in the submission plan. The requirement for an additional 505 dwellings was originally included within Policy CP2 of the LPP1, with paragraph 4.21 stating that allocations should be focussed on the ‘north/north-east of the District, primarily adjacent to the towns of Radstock and Midsomer Norton’. Our client, whose site abuts the southern boundary of Midsomer Norton, therefore welcomes the Council’s revised commitment to bring forward these additional homes. It is recognised that BANES submitted a letter to the Council in November (Appendix 2 of the 505 Dwellings Background Paper) and further in December (Appendix 5 of the Second Addendum to the Sustainability Appraisal) which objected to the 505 additional dwellings being located in the north east of the District. This is on the basis that there was no absolute requirement for the development to be in the north east and instead LPP1 states (para 4.21) this ‘may include land in the north/north-east of the District primarily adjacent to the towns of Radstock and Midsomer Norton’ [Lichfields’ emphasis]. Mendip District Council have now undertaken this sustainability analysis and have concluded that three sites are suitable for allocation on the edge of Midsomer Norton. Our client supports the methodology which underpins the location choices for the 505 dwellings and considers that the additional growth as now proposed is entirely logical and has been shown to be the most sustainable option available and is in accordance with the LPP1 inspector’s original intentions. BANES points out that detailed and comprehensive work has not been undertaken to understand the effects on social and transport infrastructure as a result of these allocations. In response, we highlight that there is no requirement for detailed work to be undertaken prior to allocation. The detailed work will be prepared in support of the planning applications which will come forward and which will be subject to scrutiny by the highways teams of both local authorities. To provide some comfort, initial work prepared by a Miles White transport consultants on the impact of c.150 dwellings at the site indicates the development can be accommodated within the network at present with some additional work required on the impact on junctions to the north within the urban area of Midsomer Norton. In addition, Landray Land Representatives has also contacted the agent for the White Post site (proposed allocation MN01) to consider whether there is scope to work with this landowner and the LPAs to undertake the required cumulative traffic modelling to BANES’ satisfaction. This requirement can be adequately controlled through the proposed policy text. It is further noted that the six Preferred Options total a minimum of 536 dwellings which exceeds the 505 dwellings by circa 6%. We consider this a prudent allocation size given the Council have applied a 5% non- implementation rate to other allocated housing sites in the five year housing land supply analysis. MM62 and MM08 (Allocation MN03) Cross Boundary Traffic Impact Assessment It is recognised that there is a requirement for additional work on the capacity of the local highway network to accommodate growth. Our client has commissioned a Technical Note which was submitted to the Council on 8th November 2019 and which provides an assessment of this site’s impact and the further work which is required to understand traffic flows travelling north into the Bath and North East Somerset authority area (BANES) – this is appended for information. The technical note, prepared by Miles White, sets out that a wide range of sustainable transport options are available from the site, and can be promoted through the development, but that further detailed modelling of the junctions to the north in the urban area of Norton Radstock needs to be undertaken as part of any planning application at the site. Pg 2/4 18266724v1 In addition, our client has contacted the agent of the adjacent site which has also been allocated in draft through the Main Modifications (Land at White Post – MM60 – for 250 dwellings) to ascertain whether there is opportunity to work together and with the LPA’s, to scope and prepare the necessary cumulative traffic assessment. Our client is committed to understanding and addressing highways issues with the site. BANES’ objection is recognised but given the initial work undertaken by Miles White, there is significant confidence that the highways impact of the proposal can be effectively addressed through consultation with both authorities prior to the submission of an application on the site. Indeed, our client would be pleased to work with BANES, MDC and other landowners in order to understand the cumulative impact of the developments on the transport network and to bring forward a solution to the satisfaction of the LPAs. Further, the highway effects from circa 450 dwelling (395 to the south of Midsomer Norton) will not be severe under the terms of NPPF and will be capable of mitigation. Connectivity The requirement for improved connectivity is recognised, with potential solutions offered in the Technical Note which was submitted to the Council along with a supporting letter. This note identified that the accessibility of the site is good with a wide range of services, facilities and public transport available within appropriate walking and cycling distances.
Recommended publications
  • The Practices of Carnival: Community, Culture and Place
    The Practices of Carnival: Community, Culture and Place. Submitted by Jonathan Freeman Croose to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geography May 2014 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. …………………………………………………………………….. 1 Abstract: This thesis analyses ethnographic data gathered during participant observation within two vernacular town carnivals in East Devon and Dorset during 2012 and within the professional Cartwheelin’ and Battle for the Winds street performances which were staged as part of the Maritime Mix programme of the 2012 Cultural Olympiad at Weymouth. The thesis presents qualitative perspectives with regard to the cultural performance of carnival in the fieldwork area, in order to analyse the ‘performativity’ of carnival in these contexts: how it enacts and embodies a range of instrumentalities with regard to notions of community, culture and place. The thesis serves to unpack the ‘performance efficacy’ of carnival within the wider political and cultural landscape of the UK in the early 21st century, revealing the increasing influence of institutional policy on its aesthetics and cultural performance. By way of contrast, the thesis also asserts the value of vernacular carnivalesque street performance as a contestation of hegemonic notions of ‘art’, ‘place’ and ‘culture’.
    [Show full text]
  • Holcombe Parish Council
    NORTON ST PHILIP PARISH COUNCIL www.nortonstphilipparishcouncil.co.uk Chair Clive Abbott, Hassage House, Faulkland, Radstock, BA3 5XG [email protected] Clerk Nicola Duke, 6 Shetland Close, Westbury, Wiltshire, BA13 2GN, [email protected] Minutes of a meeting of the Parish Council held on Wednesday 8th November 2017 at The Palairet Hall, Norton St Philip at 7.00 pm. Present: Cllr C Abbott (Chair), Cllr J Scarrow, Cllr G Hitchins, Cllr M Walker, Cllr Eastment and Cllr B Lund. In attendance: Nicola Duke (Parish Clerk) and 5 members of the public. Public Participation Mrs Lucy Trott – spoke regarding agenda item 7925(c) re: pedestrian crossing at Bell Hill. It was noted that the school was currently without a lollipop person but it was also noted that the lollipop service did not cover pre-school hours. Mrs Trott reported that parents had expressed concern at the dangers of crossing Bell Hill with small children, due to the speed and volume of the traffic and asked for consideration to be given to a zebra or pelican crossing to address this problem. Cllr Scarrow confirmed that she shared the concerns raised and reported that the issue had been discussed at a recent governor’s meeting. She expressed concern that the 20 mph limit was not slowing the traffic down as it came into the village. Cllr Eastment reported that there were technical issues relating to the installation of any pedestrian crossing. He reported that the lollipop lady had left her post due to safety concerns. He also reported that the speed indicator device had been installed at the bottom of Bell Hill and the data would be extracted and reported to the police and to Highways.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Information on Being a Trustee
    Background Information on Scouting and the Scout County of Avon 1 Scout County of Avon The Scout County of Avon provides support, governance and guidance to the local Scouting community, enabling the County Commissioner Group Leaders and District Commissioners (are key volunteer managers) to deliver exciting, challenging and safe activities for the benefit of the 13,000 young people and 4,000 adults involved in Scouting in Avon. 2 What is the structure of Scouting In its operation Scouting in the United Kingdom is organised in Scout Groups, Scout Districts, Scout Counties and Country (National) Headquarters. These ‘units’ of Scouting provide: • Support • Channels for communication • Opportunities for youth Members and adults to make decisions and take responsibility • Functional units through which the design and delivery of the youth programme can be best achieved. The UK Scout Association is divided into four national groupings - England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. England is broken down into a number of counties (including Avon). The Scout County of Avon covers the geographical areas of the 4 unitary authorities of: • Bristol • Bath and North East Somerset • South Gloucester • North Somerset The Scout County of Avon is broken down into 9 Scout districts – Scout County of Avon – background information o Bath – Bath and the surrounding villages o Wansdyke – Midsomer Norton, Radstock, Keynsham, Saltford and the surrounding villages o Cotswold Edge – Thornbury, Yate and the surrounding villages that are North of the M4 and the
    [Show full text]
  • Strode College
    REPORT FROM THE INSPECTORATE Strode College February 1994 THE FURTHER EDUCATION FUNDING COUNCIL THE FURTHER EDUCATION FUNDING COUNCIL The Further Education Funding Council (FEFC) has a statutory duty to ensure that there are satisfactory arrangements to assess the quality of provision in the further education sector. It discharges the duty in part through its inspectorate, which reports on each college in the sector every four years. The Council’s inspectorate also assesses and reports on a national basis on specific curriculum areas and advises the Council’s quality assessment committee. College inspections involve both full-time inspectors and registered part- time inspectors who have specialist knowledge and experience in the areas they inspect. Inspection teams normally include at least one member from outside the world of education and a nominated member of staff from the college being inspected. GRADE DESCRIPTORS The procedures for assessing quality are described in Council Circular 93/28. In the course of inspecting colleges, inspectors assess the strengths and weaknesses of each aspect of provision they inspect. Assessments are set out in their reports. They also summarise their judgements on the balance between strengths and weaknesses using a five-point scale. Each grade on the scale has the following descriptor: • grade 1 – provision which has many strengths and very few weaknesses • grade 2 – provision in which the strengths clearly outweigh the weaknesses • grade 3 – provision with a balance of strengths and weaknesses •
    [Show full text]
  • Sol\!ERSET I [KELLY'8 T
    • • • SOl\!ERSET I [KELLY'8 t . • Mellor .Alfred Somerville Arthur Fownes LL.B. (deputy chairman of Middleton Charles Marmaduke quarter sessions), Dinder house, Wells *Mildmay Capt. Charles Beague St. John- R.A. Hollam, Southcombe Sidney Lincoln, Highlands, .A.sh, Martock Dulverton Sparkes SI. Harford, Wardleworth, Tonedale, Wellingtn Mildmay Capt. Wyndham Paulet St. John . *Speke Col. Waiter Hanning, Jordans, Ilminster Miller John Reynolds, Haworth, High street, WellinO'ton Spencer Huntly Gordon l\Iinifie Mark, 27 Montpelier, Weston-super-Mare "' Staley Alfd. Evelyn, Combe Hill,Barton St.David,Tauntn l\Ioore Col. Henry, Higher W oodcomhe, Minehead Stanley Edward Arthur Vesey, Quantock lodge, Over Morland John, Wyrral, Glastonbury Stowey, Bridgwater 1\forland John Coleby, Ynyswytryn, Glastonbury Stanley James Talbot Mountst•even Col. Francis Render C.M.G. Odgest, Ston Staunton-Wing George Stauntoll, Fitzhead court,Tauntn Easton, Bath Stead Maurice Henry, St. Dunstan's, Magdalene street, Murray-Anderdon Henry Edward, Henlade ho. Taunton Glastonbury *Napier Lieut.-Col. Gerard Berkeley, Pennard house, Stenhouse Col. Vivian Denman, Netherleigh, Blenheim Shepton Mallet ' road, :M:inehead Napier Henry Burroughes, Hobwell,Long Ashton,Bristol Stothert Sir Percy Kendall K.B.E. Woolley grange, Nathan Lieut.-Col. Right Hon. Sir Matthew G.C.M.G., Bradford-on-Avon, Wilts R.E., K 2 & 4 Albany, London W I Strachey Capt. Hon. Edward, Sutton court, Pensford, Naylor James Richard C.S.I. Hallatrow court, Bristol Bristol Neville Adm.Sir George K.C.B., C.V.O. Babington house, Strachey Richard Sholto, .Ashwick grove, Oakhill, Bath near Bath ' *Strachie Lord, Sutton court, Pensford, Bristol; & 27 *~e~ille Grenville Robert, Bntleigh court, Glastonbury Cadogan gardens, London SW 3 .
    [Show full text]
  • Keynsham Station I Onward Travel Information Buses Local Area Map
    Keynsham Station i Onward Travel Information Buses Local area map Key Key km 0 0.5 A Bus Stop LC Keynsham Leisure Centre 0 Miles 0.25 Station Entrance/Exit M Portavon Marinas Avon Valley Adventure & WP Wildlife Park istance alking d Cycle routes tes w inu 0 m Footpaths 1 B Keynsham C Station A A bb ey Pa r k M D Keynsham Station E WP LC 1 1 0 0 m m i i n n u u t t e e s s w w a a l l k k i i n n g g d d i i e e s s t t c c a a n n Rail Replacement Bus stops are by Keynsham Church (stops D and E on the Bus Map) Stop D towards Bristol, and stop E towards Bath. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2018 & also map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, CC BY-SA Main destinations by bus (Data correct at October 2019) DESTINATION BUS ROUTES BUS STOP DESTINATION BUS ROUTES BUS STOP DESTINATION BUS ROUTES BUS STOP 19A A E Hanham 17 C Radstock 178 E Bath City Centre ^ A4, 39 E Hengrove A4 D 19A A E Bilbie Green 349 D High Littleton 178 E Saltford 39, A4 E 39, 178, A4 D Highridge A4 D 664* B E Brislington 349 E Hillfields 17 C Southmead Hospital 17 C 39, 178 D 663* B E Staple Hill 17, 19A C Keynsham - Chandag Bristol City Centre Estate 349 E 178** E Timsbury 178 E Willsbridge (for Avon Valley Bristol Airport A4 D 349 E 17, 19A C Keynsham - Park Estate Railway) Bristol Parkway ^ 19A C 665* B E UWE Frenchay Campus 19A C 39, 178 D Kingswood 17, 19A C Bristol Temple Meads ^ 349 E Longwell Green 17 C Cribbs Causeway 19A C Marksbury 178 E Downend 19A C Midsomer Norton 178 E Notes Eastville 17 C 19A A E Newton St Loe Bus routes 17, 39 and A4 operate daily.
    [Show full text]
  • Long, W, Dedications of the Somersetshire Churches, Vol 17
    116 TWENTY-THIKD ANNUAL MEETING. (l[ki[rk^. BY W, LONG, ESQ. ELIEVING that a Classified List of the Dedications jl:> of the Somersetshire Churches would be interesting and useful to the members of the Society, I have arranged them under the names of the several Patron Saints as given by Ecton in his “ Thesaurus Kerum Ecclesiasticarum,^^ 1742 Aldhelm, St. Broadway, Douiting. All Saints Alford, Ashcot, Asholt, Ashton Long, Camel West, Castle Cary, Chipstaple, Closworth, Corston, Curry Mallet, Downhead, Dulverton, Dun- kerton, Farmborough, Hinton Blewitt, Huntspill, He Brewers, Kingsdon, King Weston, Kingston Pitney in Yeovil, Kingston] Seymour, Langport, Martock, Merriot, Monksilver, Nine- head Flory, Norton Fitzwarren, Nunney, Pennard East, PoLntington, Selworthy, Telsford, Weston near Bath, Wolley, Wotton Courtney, Wraxhall, Wrington. DEDICATION OF THE SOMERSET CHURCHES. 117 Andrew, St. Aller, Almsford, Backwell, Banwell, Blagdon, Brimpton, Burnham, Ched- dar, Chewstoke, Cleeve Old, Cleve- don, Compton Dundon, Congresbury, Corton Dinham, Curry Rivel, Dowlish Wake, High Ham, Holcombe, Loxton, Mells, Northover, Stoke Courcy, Stoke under Hambdon, Thorn Coffin, Trent, Wells Cathedral, White Staunton, Withypool, Wiveliscombe. Andrew, St. and St. Mary Pitminster. Augustine, St. Clutton, Locking, Monkton West. Barnabas, St. Queen’s Camel. Bartholomew, St. Cranmore West, Ling, Ubley, Yeovilton. Bridget, St. Brean, Chelvy. Catherine, St. Drayton, Montacute, Swell. Christopher, St. Lympsham. CONGAR, St. Badgworth. Culborne, St. Culbone. David, St. Barton St. David. Dennis, St. Stock Dennis. Dubritius, St. Porlock. Dun STAN, St. Baltonsbury. Edward, St. Goathurst. Etheldred, St. Quantoxhead West. George, St. Beckington, Dunster, Easton in Gordano, Hinton St. George, Sand- ford Bret, Wembdon, Whatley. Giles, St. Bradford, Cleeve Old Chapel, Knowle St. Giles, Thurloxton.
    [Show full text]
  • Timetables for Service Number: 267
    Timetables for Service Number: 267 Saturdays (except Public Holidays) Valid from: 10/01/2016 Valid until further notice. 267 BATH - FROME Via Hinton Charterhouse, Norton St Philip, Beckington Service No.: 267 267 267 267 267 267 267 267 267 267 267 267 Notes: Bath, Bus Station [6] ---- ---- 0842 0957 1057 1157 1257 1357 1457 1557 1710 1810 St. Martin's Hospital ---- ---- 0850 1005 1105 1205 1305 1405 1505 1605 1718 1818 Midford, Hope & Anchor ---- ---- 0855 1010 1110 1210 1310 1410 1510 1610 1723 1823 Hinton Charterhouse, High Street ---- ---- 0900 1015 1115 1215 1315 1415 1515 1615 1728 1828 Norton St. Philip, Fleur-de-Lys ---- ---- 0904 1019 1119 1219 1319 1419 1519 1619 1732 1832 Woolverton, Red Lion, S-bnd ---- ---- 0909 1024 1124 1224 1324 1424 1524 1624 ---- ---- Woolverton, Red Lion, E-bnd ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 1737r 1837r Rode, Memorial Hall ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 1740s 1840s Beckington, Bus Shelter ---- ---- 0914 1029 1129 1229 1329 1429 1529 1629 1746 1846 Oldford, Ship Inn ---- ---- 0918 1033 1133 1233 1333 1433 1533 1633 1750 1850 Frome, Market Place 0716 0816 0931 1046 1146 1246 1346 1446 1546 1646 1803 1903 Frome, Critchill Rd, Westover 0722 0822 0937 1052 1152 1252 1352 1452 1552 1652 1809 1909 Notes: r Via Rode Hill s Via High St, Church Lane, Frome Rd, A361 Service No.: 267 267 267 267 Notes: bns bns Bath, Bus Station [6] 1910 2010 2110 2310 St. Martin's Hospital 1918 2018 2118 2318 Midford, Hope & Anchor 1922 2022 2122 2322 Hinton Charterhouse, High Street 1926 2026
    [Show full text]
  • Chaplaincy Development Advisor Report: January – April 2019
    Chaplaincy Development Advisor Report: January – April 2019 Introduction Chaplaincy at Haygrove School I was recently asked which was the most significant of the fifteen new Feedback from the Head Teacher chaplaincies launched in 2018. There is no one single chaplaincy that I could identify; all are exciting, innovative, challenging, creative and ‘Patrick [the Chaplain at Haygrove] pioneering. However, one important area of growth is the ever has contributed so much to our increasing number of Chaplains in community schools. Once it was only community as a non-church school. I church schools that had Chaplains. Now community schools are valuing suspect that there have been benefits chaplaincy ministry. In this they join businesses, hospitals and hospices, for us, that we had perhaps not colleges and universities, the armed forces and police, sports clubs and expected. Patrick has earned huge local government, few of which are Christian foundations. I give thanks respect in our community and has that this barrier is breaking down in schools. It is wonderful to see added a calming and reflective community schools affirming and celebrating the spiritual and pastoral element to our culture, which is care that Chaplains offer and to hear feedback such as I received from noticeable on the days when he is the Head Teacher at Haygrove School, Bridgwater. It is every bit as with us.’ exciting for us as Chaplains to be able to share the love of God with Karen Canham ever more young people and staff. Head Teacher of Haygrove School. 17th April 2019 The extension of chaplaincy into more community schools is also echoed in increasing requests for chaplaincy from organisations such as football clubs (Weston-super-Mare is the latest), transport and local government.
    [Show full text]
  • Somerset Mobile Library the Mobile Library Visits the Communities Listed Below
    Somerset Mobile Library The Mobile Library visits the communities listed below. To find the date of a visit, identify the community and the route letter. Scroll down to the relevant route schedule. The location of each stop is given as well as the dates and times of visits for the current year. Community Day Route Community Day Route A E-F Alcombe FRI L East Brent FRI H Ashcott TUE N East Chinnock TUE E East Coker TUE E B East Lydford THU K Babcary THU C Edington TUE N Badgworth FRI H Evercreech THU K Bagley FRI H Exford FRI D Baltonsborough THU C Barton St. David THU C Beercrocombe THU P G Benter WED J Goathurst WED O Biddisham FRI H Greenham TUE I Blue Anchor FRI L Brent Knoll FRI H H Bridgetown (Exe Valley) TUE A Hardington Mandeville TUE E Bridgwater (Children's Centre) FRI Q Hatch Beauchamp THU P Broadway THU P Hemington MON M Brompton Regis TUE A Hillfarance TUE I Burtle TUE N Holcombe WED J Butleigh THU C I Ilchester WED B C Ilton THU P Cannington THU G Isle Abbots THU P Catcott TUE N Isle Brewers THU P Chantry WED J Chapel Allerton FRI H J-K Charlton Horethorne WED B Keinton Mandeville THU C Chedzoy FRI Q Kilve THU G Chillington WED F Kingston St. Mary WED O Chilton Polden TUE N Chiselborough TUE E L Churchinford WED F Leigh upon Mendip WED J Coleford WED J Lydeard St. Lawrence TUE I Combwich THU G Lympsham FRI H Cotford St Luke TUE I Creech St Michael THU P Crowcombe FRI L Cutcombe FRI D D Doulting THU K Durston WED O Community Day Route Community Day Route M S Merriott TUE E Shapwick TUE N Middlezoy FRI Q Shepton Mallet(Shwgrd) THU K Milton TUE E Shipham FRI H Minehead (Butlins) FRI L Shurton THU G Monksilver FRI L South Barrow WED B Moorlinch FRI Q Southwood THU C Mudford WED B Spaxton WED O Stapley WED F N Stawell FRI Q North Curry WED O Stockland Bristol THU G North Petherton (Stockmoor) FRI Q Stogumber FRI L North Wootton THU K Stogursey THU G Norton St.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Requests PP B3E 2 County Hall Taunton Somerset TA1 4DY J Roberts
    Information Requests PP B3E 2 Please ask for: Simon Butt County Hall FOI Reference: 1700165 Taunton Direct Dial: 01823 359359 Somerset Email: [email protected] TA1 4DY Date: 3 November 2016 J Roberts ??? Dear Sir/Madam Freedom of Information Act 2000 I can confirm that the information you have requested is held by Somerset County Council. Your Request: Would you be so kind as to please supply information regarding which public service bus routes within the Somerset Area are supported by funding subsidies from Somerset County Council. Our Response: I have listed the information that we hold below Registered Local Bus Services that receive some level of direct subsidy from Somerset County Council as at 1 November 2016 N8 South Somerset DRT 9 Donyatt - Crewkerne N10 Ilminster/Martock DRT C/F Bridgwater Town Services 16 Huish Episcopi - Bridgwater 19 Bridgwater - Street 25 Taunton - Dulverton 51 Stoke St. Gregory - Taunton 96 Yeovil - Chard - Taunton 162 Frome - Shepton Mallet 184 Frome - Midsomer Norton 198 Dulverton - Minehead 414/424 Frome - Midsomer Norton 668 Shipham - Street 669 Shepton Mallet - Street 3 Taunton - Bishops Hull 1 Bridgwater Town Service N6 South Petherton - Martock DRT 5 Babcary - Yeovil 8 Pilton - Yeovil 11 Yeovil Town Service 19 Bruton - Yeovil 33 Wincanton - Frome 67 Burnham - Wookey Hole 81 South Petherton - Yeovil N11 Yeovilton - Yeovil DRT 58/412 Frome to Westbury 196 Glastonbury Tor Bus Cheddar to Bristol shopper 40 Bridport - Yeovil 53 Warminster - Frome 158 Wincanton - Shaftesbury 74/212 Dorchester
    [Show full text]
  • FOI 114/11 Crimes in Schools September 2010 – February 2011
    FOI 114/11 Crimes in Schools September 2010 – February 2011 Incident Premisies Name Town / City Current Offence Group Count Abbeywood Community School Bristol Theft And Handling Stolen Goods 4 Alexandra Park Beechen Cliff School Bath Criminal Damage 1 Alexandra Park Beechen Cliff School Bath Theft And Handling Stolen Goods 4 Alexandra Park Beechen Cliff School Bath Violence Against The Person 1 Allen School House Bristol Theft And Handling Stolen Goods 0 Archbishop Cranmer Community C Of E School Taunton Burglary 1 Ashcombe Cp School Weston-Super-Mare Theft And Handling Stolen Goods 2 Ashcombe Primary School Weston-Super-Mare Violence Against The Person 0 Ashcott Primary School Bridgwater Theft And Handling Stolen Goods 0 Ashill Primary School Ilminster Theft And Handling Stolen Goods 1 Ashley Down Infant School Bristol Theft And Handling Stolen Goods 2 Ashton Park School Bristol Other Offences 1 Ashton Park School Bristol Sexual Offences 1 Ashton Park School Bristol Theft And Handling Stolen Goods 1 Avon Primary School Bristol Burglary 2 Backwell School Bristol Burglary 3 Backwell School Bristol Theft And Handling Stolen Goods 1 Backwell School Bristol Violence Against The Person 1 Badminton School Bristol Violence Against The Person 0 Banwell Primary School Banwell Theft And Handling Stolen Goods 1 Bartletts Elm School Langport Criminal Damage 0 Barton Hill County Infant School & Nursery Bristol Burglary 1 Barton Hill Primary School Bristol Violence Against The Person 0 Barwick Stoford Pre School Yeovil Fraud Forgery 1 Batheaston Primary
    [Show full text]