The Case of the Patagonian Toothfish

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Case of the Patagonian Toothfish Lighthouse Foundation Issues of Sustainability in the Southern Ocean Fisheries – the Case of the Patagonian Toothfish Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides) © CSIRO Marine Research Liza D. Fallon and Elaine Stratford School of Geography and Environmental Studies University of Tasmania Australia March 2003 © University of Tasmania 2003 This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Australian Copyright Act 1968 or by individuals for study purposes, no part of this document may be reproduced without permission. In all cases the source of the material must be acknowledged when reproducing or quoting any part of this work. The Consultants and any individuals involved in the collection or presentation of data, or its interpretation, agree that it is the responsibility of users to make their own assessments of the suitability of this report, and the results presented herein, and that advice, opinions or information supplied within this report are used at their own risk. Fallon and Stratford: Issues of Sustainability in the Southern Ocean Fisheries Contents Figures ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Tables ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Plates ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Acronyms and Abbreviations.................................................................................................. 4 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 The Southern Ocean................................................................................................ 6 1.2 Antarctic Convergence ............................................................................................ 7 1.3 Bathymetry of the Southern Ocean ...................................................................... 7 1.4 Current systems in the Southern Ocean .............................................................. 7 1.5 Weather and climate in the Southern Ocean ...................................................... 8 1.6 Biological zonation in the Southern Ocean .......................................................... 9 2 Southern Ocean marine resources............................................................................. 10 2.1 The discovery of Southern Ocean marine resources........................................ 10 2.2 Largescale commercial marine harvesting......................................................... 15 3 Management of the Southern Ocean resources....................................................... 19 3.1 Antarctic Treaty System (ATS)............................................................................. 19 3.2 Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources........ 20 3.3 CCAMLR Commission............................................................................................. 22 3.4 CCAMLR managed fisheries.................................................................................. 23 3.5 Issues for the Antarctic Treaty System and CCAMLR ...................................... 24 4 Fishing techniques ........................................................................................................ 25 4.1 Trawling................................................................................................................... 25 4.2 Longlining................................................................................................................ 27 5 The case of the Patagonian toothfish........................................................................ 30 5.1 Ecology of the Patagonian toothfish ................................................................... 31 5.2 Uncertainty in assessing Patagonian toothfish stocks...................................... 31 5.3 Commercial exploitation of Patagonian toothfish ............................................. 32 6 Pressures on Patagonian toothfish fisheries............................................................. 33 6.1 Illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing ...................................................... 33 6.2 Incidental mortality of nontarget species........................................................... 37 7 Trade in Patagonian toothfish..................................................................................... 38 7.1 Patagonian toothfish markets .............................................................................. 38 7.2 Illegal trade of Patagonian toothfish................................................................... 39 7.3 Responsibility of consumers................................................................................. 40 1 Fallon and Stratford: Issues of Sustainability in the Southern Ocean Fisheries 8 International actors of influence................................................................................. 41 8.1 CCAMLR State Parties............................................................................................ 41 8.2 Commercial fishers ................................................................................................ 41 8.3 Nongovernment organisations............................................................................. 42 8.4 International scientific community ...................................................................... 43 8.5 Interests of international actors .......................................................................... 43 9 Challenges for Patagonian toothfish management and conservation .................. 48 10 Global sustainability imperatives – some conclusions............................................. 49 Acknowledgements................................................................................................................ 51 References .............................................................................................................................. 52 Biography of authors............................................................................................................. 60 2 Fallon and Stratford: Issues of Sustainability in the Southern Ocean Fisheries Figures Figure 2.1 Commercial exploitation of Southern Ocean marine resources…. 11 Figure 3.1 CCAMLR statistical reporting areas in the Southern Ocean………. 21 Figure 3.2 CCAMLR logo………………………………………………………………………. 22 Figure 4.1 Areas where Dissostichus spp trawling and longlining activities are take place……………………………………………………………………… 26 Figure 4.2 Demersal longlining employing the Spanish method……………….. 28 Figure 4.3 Demersal longlining employing the autolining/Mustad method…. 28 Figure 6.1 Estimated catches of Dissostichus spp 1983/84 - 2001/02………. 36 Figure 7.1 Principal Patagonian toothfish fishing grounds……………………….. 39 Figure 8.1 ISOFISH logo……………………………………………………………………… 42 Tables Table 2.1 The main marine species harvested in the Southern Ocean……… 15 Table 3.1 CCAMLR fisheries and TAC limits set by the CCAMLR Commission for the 2002/03 season……………………………………… 23 Table 4.1 Fisheries in CCAMLR statistical areas 48, 58 and 88………………… 25 Table 6.1 Identified past or current involvement in IUU fishing or landing operations………………………………………………………………………….. 34 Table 6.2 Total CCAMLR estimated catch (tonnes) of Patagonian toothfish by regulated and IUU operations 1996/97 – 2001/02……………… 35 Table 6.3 Estimated total potential seabird bycatch associated with IUU fishing for Patagonian toothfish in the CCAMLR Area………………. 37 Table 8.1 Development of the main CCAMLR observation and conservation measures in the Dissostichus spp. longline fisheries……………………………………………………………………………… 45 Plates Plate 1.1 The Southern Ocean……………………………………………………………. 8 Plate 2.1 Weddell seal……………………………………………………………………….. 12 Plate 2.2 Heard Island……………………………………………………………………….. 13 Plate 2.3 Japanese scientific whale factory ship in Antarctic waters………… 13 Plate 2.4 Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides)……………………… 19 Plate 3.1 Antarctica…………………………………………………………………………… 20 Plate 4.1 Wandering albatross hooked and drowned on a longline…………. 29 Plate 5.1 Antarctic toothfish (Dissostichus mawsoni)…………………………….. 30 Plate 6.1 Three of the four Glacial longliners moored together………………. 33 Plate 10.1 Intrinsic values of the Southern Ocean………………………………….. 49 3 Fallon and Stratford: Issues of Sustainability in the Southern Ocean Fisheries Acronyms and Abbreviations AAD – Australian Antarctic Division AFMA – Australian Fisheries Management Authority ASOC – Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition ATCP – Antarctic Treaty Consultative Party ATS – Antarctic Treaty System BIOMASS – Biological Investigation of Antarctic Systems and Stocks BSD – Bluefin Tuna Statistical Document Program CCAMLR – Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources CCAS – Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Seals CDS – Catch Documentation Scheme CITES – Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora CQFE – Centre for Quantitative Fisheries Ecology CRAMRA – Convention on the Regulation of Antarctic Mineral Resource Activities CSIRO – Australian Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation EEZ – Exclusive Economic Zone FAO – Food and Agriculture Organisation HCDCS – Harmonized Commodity Description
Recommended publications
  • Interactions of Patagonian Toothfish Fisheries With
    CCAMLR Science, Vol. 17 (2010): 179–195 INTERACTIONS OF PATAGONIAN TOOTHFISH FISHERIES WITH KILLER AND SPERM WHALES IN THE CROZET ISLANDS EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE: AN ASSESSMENT OF DEPREDATION LEVELS AND INSIGHTS ON POSSIBLE MITIGATION STRATEGIES P. Tixier1, N. Gasco2, G. Duhamel2, M. Viviant1, M. Authier1 and C. Guinet1 1 Centre d’Etudes Biologiques de Chizé CNRS, UPR 1934 Villiers-en-Bois, 79360 France Email – [email protected] 2 MNHN Paris, 75005 France Abstract Within the Crozet Islands Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), the Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides) longline fishery is exposed to high levels of depredation by killer (Orcinus orca) and sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus). From 2003 to 2008, sperm whales alone, killer whales alone, and the two species co-occurring were observed on 32.6%, 18.6% and 23.4% respectively of the 4 289 hauled lines. It was estimated that a total of 571 tonnes (€4.8 million) of Patagonian toothfish were lost due to depredation by killer whales and both killer and sperm whales. Killer whales were found to be responsible for the largest part of this loss (>75%), while sperm whales had a lower impact (>25%). Photo-identification data revealed 35 killer whales belonging to four different pods were involved in 81.3% of the interactions. Significant variations of interaction rates with killer whales were detected between vessels suggesting the influence of operational factors on depredation. When killer whales were absent at the beginning of the line hauling process, short lines (<5 000 m) provided higher yield and were significantly less impacted by depredation than longer lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution, Habitat and Trophic Ecology of Antarctic
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NERC Open Research Archive 1 Distribution, habitat and trophic ecology of Antarctic 2 cephalopods: inferences from predators and stable isotopes 3 4 J. Seco1, J. Roberts2, F.Ceia1, A. Baeta1, J. A. Ramos1, V. Paiva1, J.C. Xavier1,2 5 6 1 Institute of Marine Research, Department of Life science, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal 7 [email protected] 8 9 2 Natural Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, 301 Evans Bay Parade, Greta Point, PO Box 10 14-901, Kirbirnie, Wellington, New Zealand 11 12 3 British Antarctic Survey, NERC; High Cross, Madingley Road, CB3 0ET, Cambridge, UK 13 14 15 Abstract: 16 Cephalopods play a key role in the marine environment but knowledge of their 17 feeding habits is limited by a lack of observations and this is particularly true for 18 Antarctic species. Toothfish species are key predators of cephalopods and may be 19 viewed as ideal biological samplers of these species. A total of 256 cephalopod lower 20 beaks were identified from the stomachs of Patagonian (Dissostichus eleginoides) and 21 Antarctic toothfish (D. mawsoni), captured in fisheries of South Georgia and the 22 South Sandwich Islands in the South Atlantic. Long-armed octopus squid 23 (Kondakovia longimana) and smooth-hooked squid (Moroteuthis knipovitchi) were 24 the main cephalopod prey and both were predated upon wherever toothfish were 25 captured, though inhabit deeper waters at the South Sandwich Islands than at South 26 Georgia. Measurements of δ 13C from beak material indicated a clear segregation of 27 habitat use comparing adult and sub-adult sized K.
    [Show full text]
  • Advance and Unedited Reporting Material for the Resumed Review
    Advance and unedited reporting material for the resumed Review Conference on the Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks (New York, 23-27 May 2016) (English only) Summary The present report has been prepared in response to the request made to the Secretary-General, in paragraph 41 of General Assembly resolution 69/109, to submit to the resumed Review Conference on the Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks (the Agreement) an updated comprehensive report, prepared in cooperation with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), to assist the Conference in discharging its mandate under article 36, paragraph 2, of the Agreement. It is also based on information provided by States and regional fisheries management organizations and arrangements and other related bodies, in response to a questionnaire circulated in March 2015. The report provides an update of information contained in the reports of the Secretary-General to the Review Conference in 20061 and 2010. 2 1 A/CONF.210/2006/1. 2 A/CONF.210/2010/1. Contents Page Abbreviations .............................................................. I. Introduction................................................................ II. Overview of the status and trends of straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks, discrete high seas stocks and non-target, associated and dependent species ........................
    [Show full text]
  • Variations in the Diet Composition and Feeding Intensity of Mackerel Icefish Champsocephalus Gunnariat South Georgia (Antarctic)
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published May 12 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. Variations in the diet composition and feeding intensity of mackerel icefish Champsocephalus gunnari at South Georgia (Antarctic) K.-H. Kock l, S. Wilhelms 2, I. Everson3, J. Groger 'Institut fiir Seefischerei, Bundesforschungsanstalt fur Fischerei, Palmaille 9, D-22767 Hamburg, Germany 'Deutsches Ozeanographisches Datenzentrum, Bundesamt fiir Seeschiffahrt und Hydrographie, Bernhard-Nocht StraOe, D-20359 Hamburg, Germany 3British Antarctic Survey, High Cross Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 OET. United Kingdom 41nstitut fur Ostseefischerei, Bundesforschungsanstalt fiir Fischerei, An der Jlgerbak 2, D-18069 Rostock, Germany ABSTRACT. The diet composition and feeding intensity of mackerel icefish Champsocephalus gunnari around Shag Rocks and the mainland of South Georgia was analyzed from ca 8700 stomachs collected in January/February 1985, January/February 1991 and January 1992. Main prey items were krill Euphausia superba, the amphipod hyperiid Themisto gaudrchaudii, mysids (primarily Antarctomysis maxima), and in 1985 also Thysanoessa species The proportion of krill and 7: gaudichaudii in the diet varied considerably among the 3 years, whereas the proportion of mysids in the diet rema~nedfairly constant. Krill appears to be the preferred food. In years of krill shortage, such as in 1991, krill was replaced by 7: gaudichaudii. The occurrence of krill in the diet in 1991 was among the lowest within a 28 yr period of investigation. Variation in food composition among sampling sites was high. This high variat~onappears to be primarily associated with differences in prey availability, but much less with prey size selectivity. Feeding intensity varied considerably among seasons. It was highest in 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Age-Length Composition of Mackerel Icefish (Champsocephalus Gunnari, Perciformes, Notothenioidei, Channichthyidae) from Different Parts of the South Georgia Shelf
    CCAMLR Scieilce, Vol. 8 (2001): 133-146 AGE-LENGTH COMPOSITION OF MACKEREL ICEFISH (CHAMPSOCEPHALUS GUNNARI, PERCIFORMES, NOTOTHENIOIDEI, CHANNICHTHYIDAE) FROM DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE SOUTH GEORGIA SHELF G.A. Frolkina AtlantNIRO 5 Dmitry Donskoy Street Kaliningrad 236000, Russia Email - atlantQbaltnet.ru Abstract Biostatistical data obtained by Soviet research and commercial vessels from 1970 to 1991 have been used to determine tlne age-length composition of mackerel icefish (Chnnzpsoceplzalus g~~izllnrl)from different parts of the South Georgia area. An analysis of the spatial distribution of C. giirzrznri size and age groups over the eastern, northern, western and soutlnern parts of tlne shelf, and near Shag Rocks, revealed a similar age-leingtl~composition for young fish inhabiting areas to the west of the island and near Shag Rocks. Differences were observed between those t~7ogroups and the easterin group. The larger number of mature fish in the west is related to the migration of maturing individuals from the eastern and western parts of the area. It is implied that part of tlne western group migrates towards Shag Rocks at the age of 2-3 years. It has been found that, by number, recruits represent the largest part of tlne population, whether a fishery is operating or not. As a result of this, as well as the species' ability to live not only in off- bottom, but also in pelagic waters, an earlier age of sexual maturity compared to other nototheniids, and favourable oceanographic conditions, the C. g~lrliznrl stock could potentially recover quickly from declines in stock size and inay become abundant in the area, as has bee11 demonstrated on several occasions in the 1970s and 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Groningen Frozen Desert Alive Flores, Hauke
    University of Groningen Frozen desert alive Flores, Hauke IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2009 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Flores, H. (2009). Frozen desert alive: The role of sea ice for pelagic macrofauna and its predators. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 26-09-2021 Sorting samples. In the foreground: Antarctic krill Euphausia superba. CHAPTER 2 Diet of two icefish species from the South Shetland Islands and Elephant Island, Champsocephalus gunnari and Chaenocephalus aceratus in 2001 ‐ 2003 Hauke Flores, Karl‐Herman Kock, Sunhild Wilhelms & Christopher D. Jones Abstract The summer diet of two species of icefishes (Channichthyidae) from the South Shetland Islands and Elephant Island, Champsocephalus gunnari and Chaenocephalus aceratus, was investigated from 2001 to 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Connectivity and Molecular Ecology of Antarctic Fishes
    Chapter 5 Connectivity and Molecular Ecology of Antarctic Fishes Filip A. M. Volckaert, Jennifer Rock and Anton P. Van de Putte 5.1 Introduction The international program on Evolution and Biodiversity in the Antarctic (Anonymous 2005) focused on the influence of evolution and diversity of life on the properties and dynamics of the Southern Ocean (SO) biome. It also wanted to predict how communities and organisms respond to environmental change. A component of the program aimed at understanding micro-evolutionary processes and dynamics during the Pleistocene and Holocene. The past three million years have shaped the ‘‘shallow’’ evolution of genes, organisms and ecosystems through major climate changes and short period earth periodicities. Fish, a major source of ecosystem goods, play a key role in the ecosystem. However, it is only since relatively recently that the fish communities of the SO started to reveal their characteristics. Before summarizing the current understanding of their connec- tivity and molecular ecology, we introduce the reader to those aspects that have affected their recent evolution so much. F. A. M. Volckaert (&) Á A. P. Van de Putte Laboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Genomics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Charles Deberiotstraat 32, 3000 Leuven, Belgium e-mail: fi[email protected] J. Rock Department of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] A. P. Van de Putte Belgian Biodiversity Platform, Royal Belgian Institute for Natural Sciences, Vautierstraat 27, 1000 Brussels, Belgium e-mail: [email protected] G. di Prisco and C. Verde (eds.), Adaptation and Evolution in Marine Environments, 75 Volume 1, From Pole to Pole, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-27352-0_5, Ó Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012 76 F.
    [Show full text]
  • ORGANIC CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY of FISHES This Is Volume 33 in The
    ORGANIC CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY OF FISHES This is Volume 33 in the FISH PHYSIOLOGY series Edited by Anthony P. Farrell and Colin J. Brauner Honorary Editors: William S. Hoar and David J. Randall A complete list of books in this series appears at the end of the volume ORGANIC CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY OF FISHES Edited by KEITH B. TIERNEY Department of Biological Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta Canada ANTHONY P. FARRELL Department of Zoology, and Faculty of Land and Food Systems The University of British Columbia Vancouver, British Columbia Canada COLIN J. BRAUNER Department of Zoology The University of British Columbia Vancouver, British Columbia Canada AMSTERDAM BOSTON HEIDELBERG LONDON NEW YORK OXFORD PARIS SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO SINGAPORE SYDNEY TOKYO Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier 32 Jamestown Road, London NW1 7BY, UK 225 Wyman Street, Waltham, MA 02451, USA 525 B Street, Suite 1800, San Diego, CA 92101-4495, USA Copyright r 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved The cover illustrates the diversity of effects an example synthetic organic water pollutant can have on fish. The chemical shown is 2,4-D, an herbicide that can be found in streams near urbanization and agriculture. The fish shown is one that can live in such streams: rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). The effect shown on the left is the ability of 2,4-D (yellow line) to stimulate olfactory sensory neurons vs. control (black line) (measured as an electro- olfactogram; EOG). The effect shown on the right is the ability of 2,4-D to induce the expression of an egg yolk precursor protein (vitellogenin) in male fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Environmental Factors on Population Structure of Arrow Squid Nototodarus Gouldi: Implications for Stock Assessment
    INFLUENCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS ON POPULATION STRUCTURE OF ARROW SQUID NOTOTODARUS GOULDI: IMPLICATIONS FOR STOCK ASSESSMENT COREY PAUL GREEN, BAPPSC (FISHERIES) SUBMITTED IN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA OCTOBER 2011 Arrow squid Nototodarus gouldi (McCoy, 1888) (Courtesy of Robert Ingpen, 1974) FRONTISPIECE DECLARATION STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of the my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis, nor does the thesis contain any material that infringes copyright. ………………………………………….…. 28th October 2011 Corey Paul Green Date AUTHORITY OF ACCESS This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. ………………………………………….…. 28th October 2011 Corey Paul Green Date I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis assisted in fulfilling the objectives of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation Project No. 2006/012 ―Arrow squid — stock variability, fishing techniques, trophic linkages — facing the challenges‖. Without such assistance this thesis would not have come to fruition. Research on statolith element composition was kindly funded by the Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment (HWRE), and provided much information on arrow squid lifecycles. The University of Tasmania (UTAS), the Victorian Marine Science Consortium (VMSC) and the Department of Primary Industries — Fisheries Victoria, assisted in providing laboratories, desks and utilities, as well as offering a wonderful and inviting working environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Foraging Ecology and Diving Behaviour of Macaroni Penguins 27
    1998 Green et al.: Foraging ecology and diving behaviour of Macaroni Penguins 27 FORAGING ECOLOGY AND DIVING BEHAVIOUR OF MACARONI PENGUINS EUDYPTES CHRYSOLOPHUS AT HEARD ISLAND K. GREEN 1,2, R. WILLIAMS 1 & M.G. GREEN 2 1Antarctic Division, Channel Highway, Kingston, Tasmania 7050, Australia 2Current address: National Parks and Wildlife Service, Snowy Mountains Region, PO Box 2228, Jindabyne, New South Wales 2627, Australia ([email protected]) Received 7 May 1997, accepted 6 June 1998 SUMMARY GREEN, K., WILLIAMS, R. & GREEN, M.G. 1998. Foraging ecology and diving behaviour of Macaroni Penguins Eudyptes chrysolophus at Heard Island. Marine Ornithology 26: 27–34. Over the chick-rearing period, Macaroni Penguins Eudyptes chrysolophus foraged to the north-east of Heard Island within an approximate 300-km radius, feeding mainly on euphausiids and fish. As the season progressed, the amount of euphausiids in the diet declined by 93% with the diet becoming almost totally composed of the myctophid fish Krefftichthys anderssoni. Penguins foraged mainly on the Heard Island shelf area (seas shallower than 1000 m). Penguin dive profiles were complex, unlike the simple ‘V’ shaped dives recorded elsewhere. Diving was mainly between dawn and dusk to depths of 10–60 m, and the deepest dives were undertaken during daylight hours. The connection between the observed diving patterns and the diet was difficult to elucidate because K. anderssoni only migrates vertically into surface waters at night and is believed to be out of the penguins’ diving range during the day. INTRODUCTION METHODS Macaroni Penguins Eudyptes chrysolophus on Heard and Diet McDonald Islands are thought to number about two million breeding pairs (Woehler 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • The Kerguelen Islands Fisheries and Their Resource Species
    Fisheries catch reconstructions: Islands, Part II. Harper and Zeller 15 A BRIEF HISTORY OF FISHING IN THE KERGUELEN ISLANDS, FRANCE1 M.L.D. Palomares and D. Pauly Sea Around Us Project, Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, 2204 Main Mall, Vancouver, V6T1Z4, Canada [email protected]; [email protected] ABSTRACT Catch statistics from around the (uninhabited) Kerguelen Islands, which are part of the French Antarctic and sub-Antarctic Territories, and where distant-water fisheries began in 1970, were obtained from the CCAMLR (Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources) Statistical Bulletin (Area 58.5.1) and complemented by statistics reported through the French KERPECHE program. Catches originally expressed by fishing seasons were re-expressed as calendar years, which results in a slight between-season smoothing. These catches show a general decline over a 30 year-period and an expansion of the longline fishery to deeper waters in the last 10 years. INTRODUCTION The Kerguelen Islands The Kerguelen Islands (49°30‘S, 69°30‘E) are part of the French Antarctic and sub-Antarctic Territories, which also include the islands of Crozet, Amsterdam and St. Paul, and the Antarctic district of Terre Adélie (www.taaf.fr). They consist of a main island called ‗La Grande Terre‘ (6,700 km2) and a number of smaller surrounding islets. Kerguelen Island sits in the middle of the combined shelf of the Kerguelen and Heard Islands (Australia), known as the Kerguelen Plateau, which covers an area of 100,500 km2 above 500 m depth (Pruvost et al., 2005: see Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • South Georgia Icefish Pelagic Trawl
    MSC SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES CERTIFICATION South Georgia Icefish Pelagic Trawl Final Report May 2016 Prepared For: Polar Ltd Prepared By: Acoura Marine Ltd. Acoura Marine Final Report South Georgia Icefish Pelagic Trawl Final Report May 2016 Authors: Andy Hough, Jim Andrews, Graham Piling Certification Body: Client: Acoura Marine Polar Ltd Address: Address: 6 Redheughs Rigg 37 Fitzroy Road Edinburgh PO Box 215 EH12 9DQ Stanley Scotland, UK Falkland Islands Name: Fisheries Department Name: Alex Reid Tel: +44(0) 131 335 6601 Tel: +500 22669 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Web: www.Acoura.com version 3.0(24/03/15) Acoura Marine Final Report South Georgia Icefish Pelagic Trawl Contents 1 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 6 2 Authorship and Peer Reviewers ..................................................................................... 8 2.1 Assessment Team .................................................................................................. 8 2.2 Peer Reviewers ...................................................................................................... 9 3 Description of the Fishery ............................................................................................ 11 3.1 Unit(s) of Assessment (UoA) and Scope of Certification Sought ........................... 11 3.1.1 UoA and Proposed Unit of Certification (UoC) ............................................... 11 3.1.2 Final UoC(s)..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]