1/ 24/2019 Columns> Now Its William Barr When Will Christians And Conservatives Stop Making Excuses For Donald Trump? ( k,,, 6, f JUDAISM ' S z.' 0 • lq
Phillip- F- Toumey/p/99206328/ categary= 15986016) S
Store.aspxtl/JudTaiarmsS^trange-Gods-Book-ByeMichaelaloffman/ p/805852SOIwhgory=15986016)
f\ Li \ L. i'. RCH i_ l. THE Stora.asp UThe- Reel- Lincoln-By-Thomas- I . I N C O N I
Dilorenzo/ pI71957497/ 15986016) StoreasPrdFl/Godas- category= FOR TI-IE IIllr v (/ ALCOHOLIC
For-The-AlcoholiceBook 3yJe ry-Dunn/p/83557886/category=15986016)
WAR ma rift Birmi, Cat i 2 rrr tore.espolAVaMs-A-Rackagpl66353093/ rategory= 15986016)
PURCI-LASE. PH F BOOK
Stare.aspxIl/ George-Washington Farewell- Address- Booklet-
a "•'
Distrlbuteda3y- Dr-Chuck- Baldwin/p/88200807/category=15986016)
IStore.asptdfl/ Second-Treatise-of-Government- ByJahmlacke/p/ 60029265Ieategory= 15986016)
FR FDC R IC RA S T 1 A T Stweasp>dWThe-Law/P/ 66353092/category= 15986016)
Now It' s William Barr When Will Christians And Conservatives Stop Making Excuses For Donald Trump?
Published: Thursddi, January 24, 2019 Download tree computerized mp3 audio Me of this coin( https://chuckbaldwinitve.contPortals/1lCootant/Files/calumnaudioP2019_ 01- 24_CBColumn_audlo.mp3)
Don... 3/9 htlps:// chudcbakhviMive con Micles/ abid/ 109IIDI3833/ Now- la-WMlam- Barr-When-Wi6{: hristians-And- Conservatives- Stop- Makin9Exases-For- CrIIM16Z- 1/ 24/ 2019 Columns> Now It's William Bart: When Will Christians And Conservatives Stop Making Excuses For Donald Trump?
Okay, we all know how awful Hillary Clinton is, We all know that Donald Trump said all the right things( well, many of the right things) on the campaign trail. We all know at least believed— that Trump was not an establishment insider. We all know that Trump promised to" drain the swamp, dramatically reduce America' s out- of-control deficit spending, protect the Second Amendment, get America out of its endless foreign wars, terminate taxpayer funding for Planned Parenthood, overturn Roe v Wade and build a wall on our southern border— that Mexico would pay for—in order to stop the flow of illegal immigration into America.
Now, after two full years of a Donald Trump administration in which he enjoyed both houses of Congress being held by fellow Republicans, we all know( and if we don' t, it's because we don' t WANT to know) that none of the above has happened. Yet, Christians and conservatives by the millions continue to make excuses for this faker.
First. a brief comment about the border wall: All of the drama regarding a partial government shutdown and incessant public theater by actors from both political parties is quite nauseating. Republicans had control of both houses of Congress and the White House for two years. Why wasn't money appropriated for the wall then? Why was there no government shutdown over the lack of Ponding for the border wall then? Why wait until Democrats take over the House to shut down( partially) the federal government and threaten to declare a State of National Emergency?
Forgive me, but this stinks to high heaven. This is nothing but smoke and mirrors. All of the high profile theabics over the border wall is the biggest distraction to envelop our country in quite a spell. While everyone is fighting over the wall, some very serious attacks against our liberties are being waged almost without notice. And all of the hullabaloo over the wall is completely covering up Trump's failure to carry out the rest of his campaign promises—and the fact that Trump himself has often worked in direct opposition to many of his campaign promises.
Ses:ondly, his rhetoric notwithstanding, President Trump has NOT drawn down America's involvement in endless foreign wars. Trump's promise to bring U. S. forces home from Syria is so much hot air. Trump's" immediate" withdrawal order is now mired in an indefinite time schedule. In other words, there is no time schedule. Our hoops that are still fighting in Syria are not only still based in Syria, but they are also still using bases in Iraq as launching pads for military excursions into Syria. Of course, Trump promised that the U. S. bases in Iraq were not going anywhere—and that's one promise he will keep.
Our troops are still fighting endless wars in Afghanistan and Somalia( https:Uwww.wsj.com/ articleslamerlcasother-endless-war-somalia- 11547738433). In fact, Trump has shoved record military spending through Congress and has done nothing to reduce America' s global military presence( U. S. troops are stationed in over 160 countries,( httpa/www.infonnattonclearinghouse. info/ 50951. htm) which equates to 95% of the world' s foreign military bases). America is as much the global cop as 8 was when Trump was elected. No, that's not quite true: We are MUCH MORE the global cop than when Trump was elected, as Tromp has expanded our military presence in Eastern Europe to unprecedented levels— levels not even seen during the Cold War.
Thirdiv, as we have just passed the 46th anniversary of the ignoble Bee v Wade Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion-on- demand nationwide, unborn children continue to be legally murdered— in spite of the fact that Donald Trump was President and Republicans controlled both houses of Congress during the past two years. NI of Trump' s" pro-life" rhetoric hasn't saved the life of a single unborn baby. Since Trump was elected, over 2 million unborn children have been mercilessly murdered in the wombs of their mothers— with the complete approbation of a Republican- led federal govemment.
The GOP controlled the entire federal government for 4. 6 years of G. W. Bush's eight years in office—and thecontrolled the entire federal governmentjaithe past two years of Donald Trump' s presidency. They did NOTHING about Roe v Wade under Elugi,and they have done NOTHING about Roe v Wade under Trump. These phony pro-life GOP congressmen and senators haven't even defended America' s largest abortion provider, Planned Parenthood.
Foudhlti as to ending the federal governments extravagant spending habits, what a crock! During 8 years of a Republican majority in the House of Representatives, the federal debt INCREASED$ 7. 9 trillion. (https://www.cnsnews.com/commentarytterencep- jeffrey/republican-house-increased- debt-79- trillion-8- years) And a Trump presidency did nothing to reduce Washington' s out-of-control spending—even with Republicans in control of both houses of Congress.
Fiftir , what about Trump's promise to" drain the swami"?This is one of Trumps biggest lies of all. Trump never intended to drain the swamp. From the outset of his presidency, he began appointing mostly CFR globalists, neocons, warmongers, Zionists corporate elitists and corrupt government insiders to his administration. And he hasn' t stopped.
I am absolutely sick and fired of hearing my conservative Christian brethren say things like," Trump is trying his best, but he's getting no help from his cabinet and staff." Well. DUH! Who picked his cabinet and staff? Trump did.
For-Dori... 4/ 9 hitps://chuckbaklwinlive. com/ Articles/tabid/ 109/113/ 3833/ Now- Its- William- Bart- W hen- W ill- Christians- Antl- ConsenativesStop- MakingExcuses- 1124/ 2019 Columns> Now Its William Barr When Will Christians And Conservatives Stop Making Excuses For C] reonald Trumps Then they say things like," Trump doesn' t really understand these issues; he really wants to do right, but he's getting bad advice' BARF! If he didn't understand the issues, he's had two full years as President of the United States to get caught up. But he continue to make the same unconstitutional, big-government, warmongering decisions over and over again. The excuse that" he wants to do right, b. ist is getting bad advice" just doesn't wash anymore. It's time for Trump's supporters to wake up and realize that Donald Trump is a great big boy, not a little kid, and is fully capable of thinking for himself
Donald Trump knows exactly what he's doing. He's known exactly what he's been doing from day number one. He is the& consummate con man. He is a charlatan. He is a double-tongued pretender. He has filled the executive branch of the federal government " with the same crooks as presidents before him. kJ And now Trump' s selection of William Barr as America's next attorney general is the final straw. There can be NO MOR DOUBT.
William Barr is the swamp creature's Swamp Creature. He is the personification of all of the evil and wickedness that ha gone on in Washington, D.C., during the past 30 years. Name the act of criminality, cover-up or act of chicanery that has taken place in Washington D.C., over the last 30 years, and William Barr is probably neck deep in it.
Here is a summary of Barr's careen( https:// www.globalresearch. ca/ciabushirancontracovertoperat ve-flier-wi1liam-0arr- nominated-attorney-general/56626697PoddldGwAR13Z7GJ5sKYL6eoiSsD- VZngTPfhZ2h)(7rpJ5WgeB11d8ZUgvnrnJ hEydPQ)
BanCIAheadwas a full-time CIA operative, recruited by Langley out of high school, starting in 1971. Ba` syouth careawlpal was to the
CIA oQerative assigned to the China directorate, where he,became dose-topowe foul CIA operative George H. yy Bowhose accomplishments already inducted the CIA/Cuba Bayof Pigs, Asia CIA operatiawiVietnam War, Goltlen Triangle narcotics), Nixon foreign policy( Henry IGssinger), and the Watergate operation.
When George H.W. Bush became CIA Director in 1976, Barrjoined the CIA's" legal office" and Bush's inner circle, and worked alongside Bush's longtime CIA enforcers Theodore" Ted" Shackley, Felix Rodriguez, Thomas Clines, and others several of whom were likely involved with the Bay of Pigs/ John F. Kennedy assassination, and numerous southeast Asian operations, from the Phoenix Program to Golden Triangle narco-trafficking.
Barr stonewalled and destroyed the Church Committee investigations into CIA abuses.
Barr stonewalled and stopped inquiries in the CIA bombing assassination of Chilean opposition leader Orlando Letelier.
Barr joined George H. W. Bush's legal/intelligence team during Bush's vice presidency( under President Ronald Reagan). Rose tram assistant attorney general to Chief Legal Counsel to attorney general( 1991) during the Bush 41 presidency.
Barr was a key player in the Iran-Contra operation, if not the most important member of the apparatus, simultaneously managing the operation while also" fixing" the legal end, ensuring that all of the operatives could do their jobs without fear of exposure or arrest.
In his attorney general confirmation, Barr vowed to" attack criminal organizations," drug smugglers and money launderers. It was all hot air: as AG, Ban would preserve, protect, cover up, and nurture the apparatus that he helped create, and use Justice Department power to escape punishment
Barr stonewalled and stopped investigations into all BusNClinton and CIA crimes, including BCCI and BNL CIA drug banking, the theft of Inslaw/ PROMIS software, and all crimes of state committed by Bush.
Ban provided legal cover for Bush's illegal foreign policy and war crimes.
Barr left Washington, and went through the" rotating door' to the corporate world, where he took on numerous directorships and counsel positions for major companies. In 2007 and again from 2017, Barr was counsel for politically connected international law firm Kirkland& Ellis( https:llen.wikipedia.orglwikhKirkland_%26_Eilis). Among. ts other notable attorneys and alumni are Kenneth
bitpsdlchuckbaldwinlive. corn/ Articles/ tabid1109/ IDI3833iNow- IWWilliam- BamWhen- Will- Christians- And- Conservatives- Stop-Makingffipuus- Far-0on._ 5/ 9 1242019 Columns o Now It's William Barn When Will Christians And Conservatives Stop Making Excuses For Donald Trump?
StaryJohn Bolton 5 e C rt J t Brett K h and numerous Trump administration attorneys. K&E's clients include sex trafficker/pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, and Mitt Romney' s Bain Capital.
If all of this isn' t bad enough, Wlfam Bar' s a co-conspir for in the rd rs of Vjckiand Sammy Weaver t 1: 6.1b Ridge Idaho. James Bovard tells the story( help:/( tmbovard.com/blog2919/91/ 16hvtlllam- barn-patronaaintaf-fbianipersd:
The Senate Judiciary Committee hearings for Attorney General nominee Wiliam Barr have focused heavily on Barr's views on Special Counsel Robert Mueller. But nobody is asking about Barr's legal crusade for blanket immunity for federal agents who killed American citizens.
Barr received a routine questionnaire from the Judiciary Committee asking him to disclose his past work including pro bono activities serving the disadvantaged." The' disadvantaged' that Ban- spent the most time helping was an FBI agent who stayed an Idaho mother holding her baby in 1992. Barr spent two weeks organizing former Attorneys General https://www.judiciarysenate.gov/ Imo/ media/ doGWllliam%29Ban% 20Senate% 290uestionnaire%29(PUBLIG). pdg and others to support an FBI sniper in defending against criminal charges in connection with the Ruby Ridge incident" Ban also° assisted in framing legal arguments advanced... in the district court and the subsequent appeal to the Ninth Circuit; he told the committee.
That charitable work( for an FBI agent who already had a federally paid law firm defending him) helped tamp down one of the biggest scandals during Barrs time as Attorney General from 1991 to early 1993. Ban was responsible for both the U.S. Marshals Service and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, two federal agencies whose misconduct at Ruby Ridge" helped to weaken the bond of bust( https//articles.latimes.com/ 1995- 12- 22/ newslmn- 16891_ 1_ ruby- ridge) that must exist between ordinary Americans and our law enforcement agencies, according to a 1995 Senate Judiciary Committee report.
Mer Randy Weaver an outspoken white separatist living_on a mountaintop in northern Idahowas entrapped by an undercover federal agent, U. S. marshals trespassed on Weaver' slandBnd killed his 14yearskLson, Sammy( by shooting him in the back]. The following day, FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi killedfe,his wi Vicki, as she was standing in the cabin doorway[ holding her baby in her arms]. T Horiuchi hadgevmusly shot Randy Weaver in the back after he stepped out of the cabin. The suspects were never given a warning or a chance to surrender and had taken no action against FBI agents. Weaver survived.
After an Idaho jury found Weaver not guilty on almost all charges, federal judge Edward Lodge slammed the Justice Department and FBI for concealing evidence and showing° a callous disregard for the rights of the defendants and the interests of justice httpsJ/www.nytlmes. com(1993/ 1125/ us/ibi-shaken- by-inquiryinto-idahosiege.html).- A Justice Department internal investigation compiled a 542-page report( https://www.nytimes.com/ 1994/ 12/ 13/us/iidaho- siege-report- says-fbiagents- violatedprocedure. html) detailing federal misconduct and coverups in the case and suggested criminal charges against FBI officials involved in Ruby Ridge.
Barr told the New York Times in 1993( https:l/www.nytlmes.com11993/ 11/ 25/ us/ fbishaken- by- inquiry-into- Idaho- siege. hhnl) that he was not directly involved in the Ruby Ridge operation. Two years later, the Washington Post revealed https:/hvww.washingtonpostcomlarchive/ politics/1995/ 9922/ex-justtceaifictalsays-Pot- knew-eadter-okteens- death/a947daa6-fde8-41cd-83o$- 624eedT18b421? ubn term=.57c686fa23b4) that" top officials of the Bush Justice Department had at least 20[ phone] contacts concerning Ruby Ridge in the 24 hours before Vicki Weaver was shot," including two calls involving Barr.
In January 1995, FBI director Louis Freeh announced wrist slaps for the FBI officials involved, including his friend Larry Potts, who supervised the operation from headquarters and who approved the shoot- without-provocation orders that" contravened the constitution of the United States," according to the Justice Department internal report.
When Attorney General Janet Reno later nominated Potts for deputy director of the FBI, top newspapers and members of Congress protested, but Barr told the New York Times that his friend Potts" was deliberate and careful, and https:// www.nyttmes.com/ 1995/9528/us/ mantis- the-0ackgroundaHhe-Pot- nowdrawssomeunwelcome- attention. html) I developed a great deal of confidence in his judgment... I can' t Think of enough good things to say about him" A few months later, the FBI suspended Potts( http://articles. latimes.com/ 1995-08- 12/news/mn-34203 1_ ruby-ddgetinvestigation) after suspected perjury regarding Ruby Ridge.( Potts was not charged and retired two years later.)
I The Justice Department paid$ 3 million to settle a wrongful death lawsuit from the Weaver family. But when Boundary County, Idaho filed criminal charges against Horiuchi, Barr sprang to action seeking immunity for FBI snipers. He spearheaded efforts to sway the court to dismiss all charges because holding a sniper liable would" severely undermine, if not cripple, the ability of future
hapsl/ chuckbaldwinlive. mm/ Artidesttabid/ 109/ ID/ 3633/ Now- Its-W illiam- Bart-When- WII- Christians- And- Conservatives- Stop-MakingEmuses- For-Don... 6/ 9 1/ 24/ 2019 Columns> Now It's William Barr When Will Christians And Conservatives Stop Making Excuses For Donald Trump? attorneys general to rely on such specialized( http://articles. latimes.com2000/Jun/ 15/ news/mn- 41294) units in moments of crisis such as hostage taking and terrorist acts:
When the Justice Department won an initial appeals court victory in the case in 2000, federal judge Alex Kozinski warned in a dissent of a new James Bond" 007 standard for the use of deadly force" ( https:lIlaw.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate- courts/ F3/215/ 986/608021a against American citizens. The same court reversed that decision the following year. Kozinski, writing for the majority, declared:° A group of FBI agents formulated rules of haps:// vww.washingtonpost.wMamhive/ polhics2001/ 06/06/ ruby-ridge-charge-is-re!natated-onappea0d0ade8c2dg5c- 4777a007-ed22d5afab2bl?utm_term=.3d98728a5d7d) engagement that permitted their colleagues to hide in the bushes and gun down men who posed no immediate threat Such wartime rules are patently unconstitutional for a police action:
Does William Ban still endorse" wartime rules' and a" 007 standard" that absolve federal agents for questionable shootings of Americans? Does Barr consider" illegal government killings' to be an oxymoron? Best of all, can Barr explain to us his understanding of the phrase" government under the lath'?
See also this report in The American Conservative( https:/hwww.theamedcanconservative. conVardcleshrilliam-bans-connection-to- rubywidgedefending-ibi-snipers/Wbclid=IwAR3r6tBeofZyZJVfb3wX80EPe4GSvwscKATFy12SJOhChOQYLLM- kjyORs).
In addition, as far as William Barr is concerned, the Fourth Amendment does not even exist. Senator Rand Paul notes that Barr' has been a
flp. o t et cobch lowered the standard for spying on Americans, and he even went so far as to sa the PATRIOT Act was pretty good— we should go much further.
Rand also said that Barr is a" big fan" of seizing people' s property through civil asset forfeiture. Rand continued by saying that' the first things IP; learned about him[ Barr] being for more surveillance of Americans is very, very troubling.'
Furthermore( yes, there is more), William Barr told liberal gun grabber Senator Dianne Feinstein( 0- CA) in his senate cpnfirmation heanrn for becoming America' s next aHomegeneral Mat he ful intends topush forward with Don Id Tmmo' s Hitlerian' take the guns first, go through due process second" pun confiscation laws, also known as" red flay' lath. And remember: It was Donald Trump, not Barack Obama, who gave us more gun control by outlawing' bump stocks:
Yep! The promise to protect the Second Amendment is another promise Trump has broken( that's Number Six).
I have written previously about these Stalinesque" red flag" gun confiscation laws. https://chuckbaldwlnlive.comfArticlesttabkl/109(10/3719/ Red- Flag- Laws-Mean-Red- Flag- Rising.aspx) And I will continue to warn people about these unconstitutional, draconian' red flag" laws as long as they continue to pose a threat to our liberties.
Of course, not only are most of the individual states currently in the process of considering" red flag" gun confiscation laws( 13 states have already passed them), Republican Senator Marco Rubio( FL) has also introduced a national" red flag" law. haps:/ttownhall.coMttpsheet/belhbaumann2019/01/ 08/ marco- rubtotisspearheadinga- gun-control-policy-2a- advocates-wamed-
about-n2538539)
Red flag" gun confiscation laws are the same kind of laws that were used to confiscate the weapons of undesirables( meaning anyone the state doesn't like) in Hitler' s Germany, Stalin' s Russia, Mao' s China—.and in every despotic nation of the world.
Here is a warning about" red flag" laws( and the NRA) from TheFireAnnGuy.( https://www.youtube.com/ watch?volnlveC_- Aork&feature=youtu.be)
And here is William Bart' s statement( https://www.c- span.org/videol?c4774130/william-barr-red-flag- gun- control'laws) that' red flag' gun confiscation laws are the" single most important thing" government can do regarding gun control.
Internet blogger and longtime supporter of Donald Trump, Cad F. Worden, recently wrote this:
hitps// chuckbaldwinlive. com/ Articles/ tabid/ 109/ ID/ 3833/ Nowtts- William--Barr-When- Will- Christions- And- Conservatives- Stop- Making-Excuses- For- Don... 7/ 9 1/ 24/2019 Columns> Now It' s William Barr When Will Christians And Conservatives Stop Making Excuses For Donald Trump? Now I can understand how Trump fell for the wrongful nominations of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher Wray. That was early-on in Trump' s presidency and Trump had no way of knowing those he busted for advice were in fact Deep State maggots intent on destroying his presidency. But this is a solid two years into Trump' s first term, and it is more than obvious that Bar will not be a team player for Trump— or us!$ fact, Barr has a very troubling record on Second Amendment issues.
At this time, I have no confidence left in Donald J. Trump. He is either a complete fool, or he knows exactly what he' s doing, and either way he's not fit to represent me anymgg-_..
No more excuses, Mr. Trump!
Bravo, Carl!
Sadly, a host of Trump' s supporters continue to be bamboozled by the elaborate psyops misinformation( translated: propaganda) entity known as OAnon( https://www.groundzeromedia.org/ 1- 15- 19ganonsense-wyuinn-michaelsg, which keeps reassuring the Trump faithful that he is covertly waging war against the globalist insiders and that any day now the curtain is going to collapse on the swamp creatures. It' s all a hoax to give Trump cover—and more time.
If the nomination of William Ban as America' s next Top Cop' doesn' t awaken the" Always Tumpers,- there is absolutely no hope for them. Even worse is the fact that the longer Christians and conservatives continue to make excuses for Trump' s lies and deceptions, there is less and less hope for America
Chuck Baldwin
if you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link:
Chuck Baldwin Live Donate Fonn( https:// chuckbaldwinlive.com/ Donate.aspx)
I also have many books and DVDs available for purchase online. Go here:
Chuck Baldwin Live Store( https://chuckbaldwinlive.com/ Store. aspx)
To subscribe to my weekly columns, click here:
Subscribe to Chuck' s Column( http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/)
Related
Columns 4 Print I PDF https:// chuckbaltlwinl-rve. coMArBGesttabW/199MrticleType/ CategoryVkw/eategoryld7/Column.aspx)( J/www.printlriantlly.eom) 1121 Yews:: ;
Rating
1 2 3 4 5
Contact Us OContaclaspx) I Donate QDonataaspx) I Privacy Policy gP ivacyPolicyaspx) Refunds Policy(/ RefundsPolicy.aspx) I Shipping Policy(/ ShippingPolicy.aspx)
8/9 hitpslichuckbaldwinlivesou/ Articlesttabid/ 109/ I D/ 3833/ Now- Its-William- Bart- W hen- W ill- Christians- And- Conservatives- Stop- Making-Excuses- For-Dan... 2/3/2019 Columns> M Open Letter To Our Legislators, Judges And Lawmen G JUDAISM ' S Phillip- F-Tourney/p/ 99206328/category=15986016)
Store.aspxtllJudaismsStrangeGods-Book-By-MichaelibHmanIpig0585280/category=15986016)
III. REAL PURCHASE Ji lstore.aspx#11 he-Real- Lincoln-By-Thomas- I_ I N C O L NBOOK (
B. I fit\ S.. 1 ../ Is p/719574971eategorr15988016) plumplumDilorenzo/Store.aspxAY/ God- Is- 3( 2 I E IC- Purchase Book ALCOHOLIC
For-TheAlcoholicSook-8yJeny-Dunnlpl83557886Jcategory= 15986016)
WAR ISA RACKET A . 5-- i IStor aspx7! r-lsA Raeketlp/64353093/categot( y = 15986016) iBY;MAJ.GFJ(. SMEDLEYBUTL' ¢— EL . tR U4 „! I r ' I . 4 K
i . :', JErip, iV) t] [ I) N, N n, flee IStore.aspxal/ George- WashinglonsFarewellAddress-Booklel-
Distributed-ay-Dr-Chuck-Baldwinlp188200807/category=15986016) EA' ISE OV CC VERBME! J' a , x egosi0. ALL StoreasptdtllSecond-TreatiseofGovernment- ByJohn-Lpeke/p/ 640292651category= 15986016)
it 7 BASTIAT1oie 15986018 FRf DC RIC: asP' oR I/ fhe- Law/p16435309v l° 9° r IIIIII Lu to ri+.PM- e fl 4Iii4 IP
An Open Letter To Our Legislators, Judges And Lawmen
Published: Thursday, January 31, 2019
Download free computerized mp3 audio Me or ab column( https://ehuekbaldwinlive. com/Portalsll/ ContentlFiles/ column-audio/2019_01- 31_ CB-Column_audio-mp3)
I know I am speaking for tens of thousands of my fellow Montanans and tens of millions of my fellow Americans when I write what I' m about to
wile.
3/ 7 haps:// chudrbaldwinlive.wMAredes/ tabid/ 109/ ID/ 3030/M-0pen-Lelter-Tour-Legislabm-Judges- An4lawmen.asp( 2/ 3/2019 Columns> An Open Letter To Our Legislators, Judges And Lawmen
The" red flag" laws that are sweeping the country violate every principle of liberty upon which our country was founded. There is no due process associated with" red flag" laws. A judge's order to seize the firearms from an American citizen who has not been accused of a crime, charged with a crime, convicted of a crime— or who never even threatened to commit a crime— based on the accusation of a single individual is anything but due process.
Our accuser could be a disgruntled employee, a bitter ex- spouse or relative, a vengeful neighbor, an anti- gun liberal or even an anti- gun policeman. By definition, Ted flag" laws use mere suspicion of what one' might" do as justification to seize a person' s firearms. Tactics such as these have been used in virtually every despotic regime of history. In the name of protecting society, the rights and liberties of individuals were denied. Eventually, these repressive governments included political or religious persuasion as triggering" red flags," which led to their disarmament—all in the name of public safety, of course.
You know as well as I do that when the rights of ONE American are abridged, the rights of ALL Americans are abridged. This is not yet a communist nation where the rights of the state— or even the rights of a majority of citizens— supersede the rights of the individual.
Furthermore, it is a fallacy to suggest that a mental health diagnosis, by itself, indicates that someone is automatically a threat to himself or others. Dr. Ann Bukacek, a highly-respected medical doctor in the community in which I live, recently wrote:
Mental health diagnoses given by physicians or other mental health care workers do not predict firearm violence. As a physician for over 30 years who has treated many patients with mental health diagnoses and some autistic spectrum patients, I have not had one of those patients commit an act of gun violence. I did have a patient who bludgeoned a man to death with a blunt object, and that patient carried no mental health diagnosis. Psychopaths with no conscience, especially the more intelligent ones, usually escape detection and/ or a particular diagnosis.
This doctor's examination of the issue reflects reality.
Besides, under these" red flag" laws, exactly who is it that determines that someone is" crazy"? Is it one judge, who bases his or her conclusion on the accusations of just one individual? Is it up to politicians or government bureaucrats to define who is and who is not" crazy"?
There are some people who believe that anyone who would even own a firearm is' crazy." Others believe one's political or religious beliefs qualify him as• crazy.° Heck! We have all read the documentation of various governments( local, State and federal) that have assigned all kinds of" crazy"( even" dangerous") definitions against people based on their interpretation of Bible prophecy or their association with political candidates such as former Congressman Ron Paul or their opposition to politically correct ideologies, etc.
Does the judge who issues a warrant to seize a person' s firearms under a" red flag" law provide the accused with an opportunity to defend himself BEFORE violating his constitutional and Natural rights? No. Does the judge provide an opportunity for a close examination of the accusations against the accused( including investigating the accuser) BEFORE violating his constitutional and Natural rights? No. Does the judge allow the accused to face his accuser BEFORE violating his constitutional and Natural rights? No.
Red flag" laws turn the Bill of Rights and the fundamental legal doctrine that a man is innocent until proven guilty completely upside down. Red flag" laws are a mockery to every constitutional principle of liberty since the Magna Carta. Seizing a citizen' s firearms by force( and thereby rendering him defenseless) without a crime being committed—or even the accusation of a crime being made— is old-fashioned TYRANNY. Such an act presumes a person is guilty until proven innocent.
Then there is this: After the guns are seized, it could take years for the victim to prove his innocence( or competence) and have his guns returned— and in what condition would they be when( and IF) returned? Furthermore, will you legislators, judges and police officers who collaborate to strip an innocent person' s ability to defend himself accept any responsibility when the real bad guys take advantage of this person's vulnerability and invade his home and bludgeon or rape or even kill his family? Of course you won' t. But mark it down: You will be held responsible in the eyes of Almighty God— and in the eyes of the citizens you have victimized.
And are you really going to try and tell us that police officers are more competent and mentally stable than the rest of us? Are you kidding? The examples of improper, unsafe, careless and even homicidal acts of cops with guns are ubiquitous.
It was an FBI agent who was armed at a nightclub in Denver and then started gyrating and dancing like a madman until his handgun fell on the floor, discharged and wounded a fellow patron. But no official even questioned this officer's fitness to possess a firearm— even AFTER that
event took place.
httpsi/chuckbaldwinlive. com/ Articleskabid/ 109/ ID/ 3838/ An- Open- Letter- To-Our- Legislators- Judges-And- Lawmen. aspx 4/ 7 21312019 Columns> An Open Letter To Our Legislators, Judges And Lawmen
Then there is the case of the Dallas police officer who walked into the wrong apartment and shot and killed the man who lived inside. Where was the" red flag" regarding this officer? And what about the two police officers in St. Louis who used a revolver to play Russian roulette, and one of the two wound up shooting and killing the other one? Why wasn' t a" red flag" raised about these nincompoops? These stories could go on forever.
Where are the" red flag" laws for the policemen and sheriffs deputies in this country? The only difference between them and the rest of us who are being victimized by these draconian" red flag" laws is that they wear badges, and we do not—and the other difference is the vast majority of private citizens who carry firearms are not nearly as stupid and incompetent as the policemen mentioned above.
So much for equal justice under the law.
It has taken many of us a lifetime of hard work and labor to be able to obtain our gun collections; we have successfully passed FBI background checks and local and State requirements and obligations for responsible gun ownership, yet our guns are going to be confiscated overnight on the word of someone( an anonymous someone, at that) who claims we" might" be unsuitable to own a gun? Again, such an act turns American history and our Bill of Rights upside down.
Kris Kobach is the former Secretary of State of Kansas. He is a former professor of constitutional law at UMKC School of Law. He wrote an excellent analysis of the constitutional violations of these" red flag° laws:
1. The seizure of guns without any hearing at all. The laws all contain an ex parte provision that allows the state to temporarily seize a person's guns without even notifying the gun owner or giving him a chance to be heard. This is the quintesRnntial denial of due process. The Fourth Amendment makes clear that a person cannot be denied of liberty( to exercise one' s constitutional right to bear arms) without due process of law. This confiscation is" temporary," but it can easily lead to long-term or permanent confiscation.
2. Based on the testimony of one unrelated person, The confiscation order can be based on the testimony of only one person claiming that the gun owner poses a risk to the safety of himself or others. The law( proposed in Kansas] deceptively says that it has to be the testimony of a" family member." But" family member" is defined http:// ksleglslature.org81/ b2017 18/measures/documents/sb431_ 00_0000. pdf) to include" former dating partners" and anyone who has ever lived with the defendant. So a jilted former boyfriend or girlfriend, or even a roommate from years ago, could easily set in motion the disarming of a lawful gun owner.
3. Usingavery low standard of proof. The standard for obtaining an ex parte order against a gun owner is absurdly low— one need only show" reasonable cause" to believe that the person may pose a risk. That' s even lower than the" probable cause" standard for obtaining a search warrant. In addition, the judge is forced to rush his decision and issue the confiscation order on the same day of the ex parte hearing. Within two weeks of the ex parte hearing, a hearing with the gun owner present must occur; the purpose is to put in place a long- term confiscation order. But even at that hearing, the standard of proof http:// ksleglslature.orgfli/ b2017 18/measures/documents/sb431_ 00_0000. pdf) is far below the" beyond a reasonable doubt" standard used in criminal trials. Rather, it need only be shown by" a preponderance of evidence" that the person poses a risk of injury to self or others. What kind of evidence? Things like the" reckless storage" of firearms and drinking habits can be considered. If you keep a handgun in the bedside table and drink beer regularly, you may[ be] in trouble.
4. Shifting the burden of nroof to the gun owner. The long- term confiscation order lasts up to a year, but may be renewed indefinitely. Once it is in place, it becomes very difficult to remove. To have the confiscation order lifted, the gun owner must prove http:// kslegislature.orglii/ b2017_ 18/measures/documents/sb431_ 00 0000.pdf) he does not pose a threat to himself or others. Proving a negative is nearly impossible. Adding insult to injury, the bill even authorizes local law enforcement to charge the gun owner a storage fee for confiscating and storing his guns.
The implementation of" red flag" laws( at any level) is unconscionable and totally unacceptable. And I am here to warn you that there are millions of Americans who will never submit to such oppression. None of us wants to see acts of violence committed against law enforcement personnel In America, but when law enforcers begin carrying out these draconian" red flag" laws, they will begin lighting the matches of resistance in the hearts of freedom- loving people in this country like hasn't been seen in over 150 years.
We have already heard about Gary Willis, the Maryland man who was killed by police officers in his own home as they attempted to carry out a red flag" order to seize his guns. This man had committed no crime; he had not been accused of committing a crime; he was given no hearing and no due process. Mr. Willis did not attempt to harm the officers; he merely resisted their efforts to disarm him, and he was killed on the spot in his own home— by police officers who had taken an oath to protect the liberties of this poor innocent man. https9/ chuckbaldwinlive.comIArticles/ tabid/ 109/ 1D/ 3838/An- Open- Letter-To- Our-Legislators- Judges-And- Lawmen. aspx 5/7 2/ 3/ 2019 Columns> An Open Letter To Our Legislators, Judges And Lawmen
1 assure you, Mr. Willis will not be the last American to resist the attempted confiscation of his firearms.
r Do you legislators, judges, county sheriffs, chiefs of police, sheriffs deputies and city policemen not realize that red flag" laws are tantamount to a declaration of war against the American people? Are you so far removed from" the laws of Nature and Nature' s God" that you cannot see this? Do you not realize that in spite of all of Great Britain's abuses of power, our colonist forebears did not openly rebel against the Crown until King George sent troops to Lexington and Concord to confiscate the colonists' firearms? You do understand that, right? And you do understand, do you not, that the blood of the colonists flows in the veins of we Americans?
At what point do the American people come to believe that you truly do NOT wish to honor your oath to the Constitution or behave in a manner that truly honors America' s Second Amendment and the heritage of liberty that we all share as Americans? At what point do we Americans lose all respect for our civil magistrates and peace officers? For many Americans, that point will come when policemen bang on their doors at Sam and attempt to seize their guns.
Do you not realize that every single instance of an innocent person being subjected to a" red flag" gun confiscation order will only magnify and strengthen the resentment and animosity in the hearts of the community against these laws—and against the ones who are creating and implementing them? Do you not understand that this is a powder keg that could explode into all-out rebellion at any time? Do you want that? I don' t want that! I don't want that for my wife and me, my children and grandchildren, my friends or my community.
Why would you legislators, judges and policemen even think about doing such a thing?
In the name of all that we hold dear, in the name of the brave men at Lexington Green and Concord Bridge, in the name of every American who has given his life in defense of the principles contained in our Declaration of Independence, our Constitution and our Bill of Rights— including many of our brave police officers and sheriff's deputies—and in the name of the Natural Laws of our Creator, please STOP this madness before you literally tear our communities and our country apart.
As a legislator, you must not pass any semblance of a" red flag" law; as a judge, you must not issue a gun confiscation warrant on the basis of a red flag" law; as a sheriff or chief of police, you must not order your officers to confiscate a citizen's guns on the basis of a" red flag' warrant; and if you are a sheriffs deputy or city policeman, you must not obey an order to confiscate your fellow citizens' guns on the basis of a" red flag' law.
I beg you to realize what you are doing. I beg you to refuse to participate in this madness. I beg you to join your fellow churchmen, clubmen, neighbors, friends and townsmen and help us turn back this dastardly attempt to transform our constitutional republic into another repressive regime that, in the end, would require The People to tear it down.
Red flag" laws are on the wrong side of history, the wrong side of our Constitution, the wrong side of liberty and on the wrong side of the laws of God.
Again, I beg you to think about what you are doing, about the pain you are causing, about the lives you are ruining and about the potential harm you are inflicting on our country. Please think this through.
Chuck Baldwin
If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link:
Chuck Baldwin Live Donate Form( https:/lchuckbaldwinlive. com/ Donate.aspx)
I also have many books and DVDs available for purchase online. Go here:
Chuck Baldwin Live Store( https: Ilchuckbaldwinlive. com/ Store. aspx)
https:// chuckbaldwinlive.com/ Articles/tabid/ 109/ ID/ 3838/ An- Open- Letter- To- Our- Legislators- Judges- And- Lawmen aspx 6)7 1 .
72 Types Of Americans That Are Considered Potential Terrorists" In Official Government Documents 1By Michael Snyder, on August 26th, 2013
00000
Are you a conservative, a libertarian, a Christian or a gun owner? Are you opposed to abortion, globalism, Communism, illegal immigration, the United Nations or the New World Order? Do you believe in conspiracy theories, do you believe that we are living In the" end ernes" or do you ever visit alternative news websites suds as this one)? if you answered yes to any of those questions, you are a' potential terrorist" according to official U. S. government documents. At one time, the term" terrorist" was used very narrowly. The government applied that label to people like Osama bin Laden and other Islamic jihadists. But now the Obama administration is removing all references to Islam from terror training materials, and instead the term terrorist" is being applied to large groups of American citizens. And if you are a" terrorist", that means that you have no rights and the government on treat you lust like It treats the terrorists that are being held at Guantanamo Bay. So if you belong to a group of people that Is now being referred to as' potential terrorists", please don't take it as a joke. The first step to persecuting any group of people is to demonize them. And right now large groups of peaceful, law-abiding citizens are being ruthlessly demonized. Below is a list of 72 types of Americans that are considered to be" extremists" and" potential terrorists" in official U.S. government documents. To see the original source document for each point, lust dick on the link. As you en see, this list covers most of the country... 1. Those that talk about" individual liberties"
2. Those that advocate for states' rights
3. Those that want" to make the world a better place" 4. " The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule" 5. Those that are interested in" defeating the Communists" Jw•L , y : 1t5 20 ) 1 Ps-setcr c kat./c. Dt/JkJ,A re&d SfMe of-Mese:- fit t ongrerj6,J, on and elkc5e W6-14- tiny LI R, Pregrn. 6. Those that believe that the interests of one' s own nation are separate from the interests of other nations or the common interest of all nations" 7. Anyone that holds a " political ideology that considers the state to be unnecessary, harmful, or undesirable"
8. Anyone that possesses an " intolerance toward other religions" 9. Those that' take action to fight against the exploitation of the environment and/ or animals"
10. " Anti- Gay"
11." Anti- Immigrant"
12." Anti- Muslim"
13." The Patriot Movement"
14. " Opposition to equal rights for gays and lesbians"
15. Members of the Family Research Council
16. Members of the American Family Association 17. Those that believe that Mexico, Canada and the United States" are secretly planning to merge into a European Union- like entity that will be known as the' North American Union"' 18. Members of the American Border Patrol/ American Patrol 19. Members of the Federation for American Immigration Reform 20. Members of the Tennessee Freedom Coalition
21. Members of the Christian Action Network 22. Anyone that is" opposed to the New World Order"
23. Anyone that is engaged in" conspiracy theorizing"
24. Anyone that is opposed to Agenda 21
25. Anyone that is concerned about FEMA camps
26. Anyone that" fears impending gun control or weapons confiscations"
27. The militia movement
28. The sovereign citizen movement
29. Those that" don' t think they should have to pay taxes"
30. Anyone that" complains about bias"
31. Anyone that" believes in government conspiracies to the point of paranoia" 32. Anyone that" is frustrated with mainstream ideologies"
33. Anyone that" visits extremist websites/ blogs"
34. Anyone that" establishes website/ blog to display extremist views"
35. Anyone that" attends rallies for extremist causes" 36. Anyone that" exhibits extreme religious intolerance"
37. Anyone that " is personally connected with a grievance" 1 •
38. Anyone that " suddenly acquires weapons" 39. Anyone that ` organizes protests inspired by extremist ideology" 40. " Militia or unorganized militia"
41. " General right- wing extremist" 42. Citizens that have " bumper stickers" that are patriotic or anti- U. N. 43. Those that refer to an " Army of God" 44. Those that are " fiercely nationalistic ( as opposed to universal and international in orientation)"
45. Those that are " anti- global" 46. Those that are " suspicious of centralized federal authority" 47. Those that are " reverent of individual liberty" 48. Those that" believe in conspiracy theories" 49. Those that have " a belief that one's personal and/ or national ' way of life' is under attack" 50. Those that possess" a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism" 51. Those that would " impose strict religious tenets or laws on society ( fundamentalists)" 52. Those that would " insert religion into the political sphere" 53. Anyone that would " seek to politicize religion" 54. Those that have" supported political movements for autonomy" 55. Anyone that is " anti- abortion"
56. Anyone that is " anti- Catholic"
57. Anyone that is " anti- nuclear"
58. " Rightwing extremists"
59. " Returning veterans"
60. Those concerned about" illegal immigration"
61. Those that" believe in the right to bear arms" 62. Anyone that is engaged in " ammunition stockpiling" 63. Anyone that exhibits" fear of Communist regimes"
64. " Anti- abortion activists"
65. Those that are against illegal immigration 66. Those that talk about" the New World Order" in a " derogatory' manner 67. Those that have a negative view of the United Nations 68. Those that are opposed " to the collection of federal income taxes' 69. Those that supported former presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr 70. Those that display the Gadsden Flag (" Don' t Tread On Me") 71. Those that believe in " end times" prophecies
72. Evangelical Christians The groups of people in the list above are considered' problems' that need to be dealt with. In some of the documents referenced above, members of the military are specifically warned not to have anything to do with such groups. We are moving into a very dangerous-time in American Mstory. You can now be considered a' potential terrorist' just because of your religious or political beliefs. Free speech is becoming a thing of the past, and we are rapidly becoming an Orwellian society that is the exact opposite of what our founding fathers intended. Please pray for the United States of Ameria. We definitely need it. About the author: Michael T. Snyder is a former Washington D.C. attorney who now publishes The Of The End" is now available on Amazon. com. Truth. His new thriller entitled" The Beginning Bob 8 Jean
From: " Gary Spangler'< [email protected]> To:. Richard: iter'< notharoSeaiypo com> m>;' 9garyry gram"< ggram2 hotmail. com> Monday April 12, 201011: 19 AM Subject: Fwd: 1944 Quotation
Subject: Fw: 1944 Quote
A quote from 1944.
twrmcrt hkrttoon Thous:. v Neve lt7er = t er tttMl{lJer 191 i 4 1 k •+ rates a4dngAmenoncoeiaksy,l and s three presidential candidate In tier Socia ist Party of Amer"
The Socialist Party candidate far MtesidaR of Hee IS Normomas,al Th said this uh a 194 speech:
The American people will hem( Iwowatqly adapt sticiaAsm But, widerthe ewne of' Uberallsm.`they w'S adopt every fragment of the socialist program, rata one day Ataarica will be a socialist action. rithout bowing how t happened,• Se went onto say.' I no longer treed to rem as B Prashhmtial Candidate forthe Socialist Pet/. The Democrat Party has adopted aur plattfarm ,
If you aren' t scared, ou' re NOT LISTENING
iff oU G P-. 4/ 12/ 2010 ARE WE COMMUNISTS?
The 10 planks of the Communist Manifesto( 1848) by What our Federal and State Governments have forced
Karl Marx: upon us:
1. Sate Property taxes. If you think you own your 1. Abolition of property in land and application of all land, don't pay your rent(property tax) and you will see rents of land to public purposes. who owns it. 2. Federal and State income taxes. 3. Federal and State inheritance taxes and re- 2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax. formed probate laws. 4. Sedition Act of 1798; I.R.S. powers; Executive Order 11490, sec 1205 - giving total power over all 3. Abolition of all right of inheritance. private lands to the Dept. of Housing and Urban Develop- ment; Executive Order 11490 - giving total power over all personal property to the General Services Administration 4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and Sec. 2002). rebels. 5. The Federal Reserve System(The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 unlawfully delegated the power to regulate the value of our money to the Peden Resrve, 5. Centralization of Credit in the hands of the State, by which is private corporation. See- U.S. Constitution, Art means of a national bank with State capital and an exclu- 1, Sec. 8( 5)- Only Congress can have this power.) sive monopoly. 6. F. C.C. regulations and Executive Order 10995 provides for the take over of all communication medias; State Drivers Licenses provide for State regulation of the 6. Centrallization of the means of communication and privilege" to travel; D.O.T. regulation and Executive transport inthe hands of the State. Order 10999 provide for the take over of all modes of transportation. 7. The Federal Government has total production 7. Extension of factories and instruments of and labor control under Executive Order 11490 through productionowned by the State, the bringing into cultiva- the Dept.'s of Labor, Commerce, Agriculture, and interior tion of waste lands, find the improvement of the soil Dept. of Interior controls: Bureau of Land Management, generally in accordance with a common plan. Bureau of REclamation, Fish & Wildlife Service, etc.) 8. Federal Emergency Public Works Programs: Executive Order 11000 provides for forced mobilization 8. Equal liability of all to labor. Establishment of indus- of civilian into work brigades. trial for agriculture. crimes, especially 9. Using the Re- organization Act of 1949, Execu- tive Order 11647, Public Law 80- 136, and Executive Order 11731 we will no longer have 50 States with cities 9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing indus- and towns, but instead have 10 regions and their respec- tries; gradual abolition of the dinstinction between town tive captials. and country, by a more equable distribution of population 10. Free State Public Schools; Child Abuse Laws; over the country. Child labor laws where children work with State approval
abolition of private apprenticeships & the creation of State controlled apprenticeships ( Fair labor Standards Act 10. Free education for all children in public schools. of 1937). Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc. etc.