DOCSLIB.ORG

Request Letter: Pollock Conservation Cooperative (PCC)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Request Letter: Pollock Conservation Cooperative (PCC) MUNDT MACGREGOR_ L.L.r. \ T O R N E Y S A l L A W Jay H. Zulauf John H. Chun Henry Howard Happel. III 999 Third Avenue · Suite 4200 Christopher S. McNulty Wm. Paul MacGregor Joe B. Stansell Seattle, Washington· 98104-4082 Michael J. Hyde Christopher R. M. Stanton J. David Stahl Libby A. Williams Telephone Matthew L. Fick (206) 624-5950 Joseph M, Sullivan Facsimile (206) 624-5469 Lisa Riveland Pagán December 20, 1998 Janet H. Cheetham OF COUNSEL Mr. Joel I. Klein VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Assistant Attorney General Antitrust Division Department of Justice Tenth and Constitution Avenue, N.W. Room3109 Washington D .C. 20530 Re: Pollock Conservation Cooperative - Request For Business Review Letter Dear Mr. Klein: We are writing to you on behalf of the Members (as defined below) and on behalf of Pollock Conservation Cooperative, a Washington nonprofit corporation (the "Cooperative") to request that the Department of Justice provide us with a statement of its enforcement intentions with respect to the proposed activity described below, pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 50.6. Alaska Ocean Seafood, L.P., a Washington limited partnership(" Alaska Ocean"), Alaska Trawl Fisheries, Inc., a Washington corporation(" Alaska Trawl"), American Seafoods Company, a Washington corporation(" American"), Arctic Fjord, Inc., a Washington corporation(" Arctic Fjord"), Arctic Storm, Inc., a Washington corporation(" Arctic Storm"), Glacier Fish Company LLC, a Washington limited liability company ("Glacier"), Highland Light Seafoods, LLC, a Washington limited liability company ("Highland Light"), Starbound Ltd. Partnership, a Washington limited partnership ("Starbound") and Tyson Foods, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Tyson"), (together, the "Members") have formed the Cooperative, and propose to conduct a cooperative fish harvesting arrangement under its auspices. As more fully explained below, the Cooperative is intended to function as a harvesting association through which the Members would allocate among themselves certain percentages of the total allowable catch ("TAC") for the catcher/processor sector Mr. Joel I. Klein MUNDT MACGREGOR L.L.r. \ \ 1 \ \\ December 20, 1998 Page2 of the Bering Sea/ Aleutian Islands ("BS/ AI") pollock fishery (the "Pollock Fishery") and certain other groundfish fisheries. The purpose of the proposed mutual harvest allocation agreement is to enable the Members to improve their utilization of pollock and other groundfish (the "target species" of the fisheries), to reduce their incidental catch (or "bycatch") of important non-target species such as salmon, herring, crab and halibut (together, the "prohibited species"), and to disperse their fishing effort in time and area, consistent with the principles of the "Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives" ("RP As") imposed by the National Marine Fisheries Service ("NMFS") in connection with its Endangered Species Act ("ESA") "Section 7 consultation" concerning the Steller sea lion. The following documents are enclosed for your reference: 1) A copy of the American Fisheries Act (Division C, Title II of Public Law 105-277) (the" AFA"), with the related Statement by Senator Stevens and the related Section by Section analysis. The AFA took effect October 21, 1998. It imposes a new U.S. ownership requirement as of 2001 on fishing vessels operating in U.S. waters, allocates BS/ AI pollock resources among several industry sectors as of January 1, 1999, and restricts the eligibility of certain vessels to harvest and process BS/ AI area resources as of January 1, 1999 and the eligibility of others as of January 1, 2000. 2) A copy of the RP As adopted by NMFS in connection with the ESA Section 7 Consultation conducted with respect to authorization of the BS/ AI and Gulf of Alaska pollock fisheries of 1999 through 2002, to analyze their potential impact on the Steller sea lion population of those areas. Also enclosed is a copy of the RP A Section of the related NMFS "Biological Opinion". 3) Alaska pollock product distribution data and charts, prepared in connection with the fall 1998 proceedings of the Groundfish Forum (an international seafood producer trade association). 4) Product-by-sector tables produced for the North Pacific Fishery Management Council (the "Council") in connection with Council's recent consideration of the second re-authorization of the "inshore/ offshore" BS/ AI pollock allocation ("I/O 3"). Mr. Joel I. Klein MUNDT MACGREGOR L.L.P. \ r r N l \ \ \\ December 20, 1998 Page3 5) Documents concerning the markets for BS/ AI pollock products, i.e., (a) a "Product Mix and Market" analysis prepared for the Council in connection with I/O 3; (b) "Processing Sector Ownership Interests and Patterns" analysis prepared for the Council in connection with I/O 3; (c) 1996 U.S. pollock catch data, and production tables for the BS/ AI shoreside plants operated by UniSea, Westward Seafoods, Trident Seafoods and Alyeska Seafoods, reflecting raw pollock deliveries to those plants (as reported to EPA); and (d) corporate profiles for Nippon Suisan (100% owner of UniSea) and Maruha (100% owner of Westward Seafoods and 50% owner of Alyeska Seafoods). 6) The Articles of Incorporation of the Cooperative, and the Cooperative Membership Agreement (the" Agreement"). The Agreement specifies the terms under which the Members propose to conduct a cooperative fishery resource harvesting arrangement; 7) A spreadsheet based on information compiled from industry sources, which shows the optimal increase in pollock products available to the U.S. market that could result from a cooperative harvesting arrangement for the catcher/ processor sector of the Pollock Fishery. 8) A copy of a report from Pacific Whiting Conservation Cooperative to the National Research Council, which describes the increases in production and decreases in incidental catch of certain non-target species obtained by implementing a comparable cooperative harvesting arrangement in the Pacific coast whiting fishery. 1. Fishery Management. The BS/ AI pollock resource is commonly considered to be composed of two stocks: the "Eastern Bering Sea" stock, and the "Aleutian Basin" stock. These stocks are fished in both the U.S. and Russian 200 mile "fishery conservation zones". Consequently, you will see references to foreign catch of Alaska pollock (in the Groundfish Forum data for example), even though no foreign vessels fish in U.S. waters. The Eastern Bering Sea and Aleutian Basin are currently managed as separate areas. Pollock Fishery management policy is established by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council (the "Council"), one of the regional councils constituted under the Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries Conservation and Management Act (16 USC §1801 et. Seq.) (the "Magnuson-Stevens Act"). Mr. Joel I. Klein MUNDT MACGREGOR_ LLP. .\ l \ .\ \\ December 20, 1998 Page4 The Council sets the annual allocation levels for the resources under its jurisdiction, and sub-allocates harvesting rights to certain of those resources among various fishing gear and processing sectors. Upon adoption by the Council, BS/ AI and Gulf of Alaska fishery management policy is implemented through regulations drafted and promulgated by the NMFS. The NMFS Alaska Regional Office, located in Juneau, Alaska, has management jurisdiction over the Pollock Fishery. The federal management regulations for the Pollock Fishery (and all other fisheries under Council jurisdiction) are at 50 C.F.R. § 679. As a general matter, the fisheries under Council jurisdiction are managed on a quota-driven basis, i.e., the Council and NMFS set an annual total allowable catch ("TAC") based on stock size estimates and other biological and economic considerations, allocate prohibited species catch ("PSC") amounts for each fishery or fisheries complex, open the fisheries on selected seasonal opening dates, and each sector of the fishery remains open to all eligible harvesters until the earlier of the TAC for that season and sector having been harvested, the PSC cap for the fishery having been reached, or the seasonal closing date. At their current levels of capitalization, the Pollock Fishery and almost all other groundfish fisheries under Council jurisdiction are constrained by their TAC or their PSC allocation, i.e., the fisheries are fully utilized up to their regulatory limit. The BS/ AI Pollock Fishery is managed on the basis of three major management areas: the Eastern Bering Sea, the Aleutian Islands, and the "Bogoslof" area, with individual biomasses, allowable biological catches and TACs being calculated for each area. See map at Tab 2A. The BS/ AI Pollock Fishery TAC has generally averaged between 1and1.5 million metric tons per year since the mid 1970's. See "Figure 13" catch data at Tab 2. The Council has proposed that the Eastern Bering Sea TAC be set at 992,000 metric tons for 1999, and that the Aleutian Islands and Bogoslof areas be placed on "bycatch only" status; in other words, no directed pollock fishery would be allowed in either area. The Pollock Fishery has been allocated among three major groups since 1992: (i) Community Development Quota groups (the "CDQ Groups") which are composed of Western Alaskan Native villages that receive an allocation as part of a fishery-related economic development program; (ii) the "inshore" sector, composed of catcher vessels that deliver their catch to processing plants built onshore or anchored at a single location within State of Alaska waters; and (iii) the "offshore" sector, composed of "catcher/processors", i.e., vessels that catch and process fish, and the "mothership" Mr. Joel I. Klein MUNDT MACGREGOR L.L.r. \ r \ 1 L \ \\ December 20, 1998 Page5 fleet, which is composed of catcher vessels that deliver their product to mobile processing vessels that do not catch fish themselves, and such processing vessels. The Pollock Fishery TAC is further allocated by seasons and sub-areas, to disperse fishing effort in time and space. Under the NMFS management regime that " "B" has been in place for some time, the Pollock Fishery is divided into A" and seasons. The TAC is then split between the"A" and 11 B" seasons, on a sector-by-sector basis.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pollock Conservation Cooperative and High Seas Catchers
    Pollock Conservation Cooperative and High Seas Catchers’ Cooperative Joint Annual Report 2017 North Pacific Fishery Management Council March 15, 2018 Table of Contents Pollock Conservation Cooperative Annual Report ............................................................................................. 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Purpose of Report ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Reporting Requirements .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Cooperative Members and Allocations ................................................................................................................................ 4 Inter-Cooperative Agreement Between PCC and HSCC .................................................................................................. 4 Yellowfin Sole, Atka Mackerel, and Pacific Cod Fisheries ............................................................................................. 8 AFA Sideboard Limits and Total Groundfish Catch ......................................................................................................... 9 Pollock Fishery Discards .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Sturgeon Assessment by Great Lakes Commercial Fishers 2001
    Lake Sturgeon Assessment Assistance by Great Lakes Commercial Fishers 2001-2002 March 2003 Emily C. Zollweg, Editor, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Lower Great Lakes Fishery Resources Office, 405 N. French Rd, Suite 120A, Amherst, New York 14228, USA; (716) 691-5456; FAX (716) 691-6154; [email protected] Brian J. Gunderman and Robert F. Elliott, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Green Bay Fishery Resources Office, 2661 Scott Tower Drive, New Franken, Wisconsin 54229, USA; (920) 866-1755; FAX (920) 866-1710; [email protected], [email protected] Adam Kowalski and Tracy D. Hill, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Alpena Fishery Resources Office, 145 Water St., Alpena, Michigan 49707, USA; (989) 356- 5102; FAX (989) 356-6154; [email protected], [email protected] Glenn Miller, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ashland Fishery Resources Office, 2800 Lakeshore Drive East, Ashland, Wisconsin 54806, USA; (715) 682-6185; FAX (715) 682-8899; [email protected] ABSTRACT Currently there is no commercial fishing for lake sturgeon, (Acipenser fulvescens), in U. S. waters of the Great Lakes and sport fishing is limited. Canada allows commercial harvest from Ontario waters of Lake Huron only. Lake sturgeon is considered threatened or endangered by 19 of the 20 states within its original range in the U.S. Lake sturgeon abundance was reduced dramatically in the late 1800’s by commercial overfishing and habitat degradation. The life history characteristics of lake sturgeon, late maturity and infrequent spawning after maturity, prevent populations from rebounding quickly after such catastrophes. Fishery agencies are providing training and equipment to commercial fishers for data collection from lake sturgeon.
    [Show full text]
  • Buy Local Guide | Eat Wisconsin Fish
    BUY LOCAL 1 GUIDE FOR RETAILERS, RESTAURANTS AND CULINARY SCHOOLS 2 BUY LOCAL GUIDE FOR RETAILERS, RESTAURANTS AND CULINARY SCHOOLS WALKING THE WALK 3 addling across the lake at your family’s cabin, anticipating the sound of a freshly caught trout sizzling on a cast iron pan—many Wisconsinites feel inspired by and connected to our local waters. Eating local Wiscon- sin fish is a very powerful way for us to stay connected to these waters when we’re enjoying dinner at a restaurant or preparing a meal for our families back at home. PThis guide showcases seafood available from producers in Wisconsin, a state rich in both fishing heritage and water resources. Generations of families have commercially harvested Wisconsin waters of Lake Michigan and Lake Superior since the 1830s, and Wisconsin fish farmers are leaders in aquaponics, cultivating fish and plants together to efficiently recycle nutrients. There’s a lot for us to love about our Wisconsin fish: Local Jobs: More than 90% of the seafood eaten by Americans is imported from other countries. By purchasing fish from Wisconsin fish farmers and Great Lakes commercial fishers, food dollars support local family businesses. Local Protection: Unlike many international seafood producers, Wisconsin fish farmers and Great Lakes commercial fishermen are strictly regulated by federal and state laws that protect fish populations, human health and the environment. Local Stewardship: People who care about eating local fish also care about local water, and more people caring about Wisconsin’s water is good for us all. Enjoy meeting our local Wisconsin fish producers! KATHLEEN S.
    [Show full text]
  • FOR: FORTUNE FISH COMPANY 1068 Thorndale Ave
    FOR: FORTUNE FISH COMPANY 1068 Thorndale Ave. Bensenville, IL 60106 630.860.7100 www.fortunefishco.net CONTACT: RR PUBLIC RELATIONS, INC. Susie Riskind 847.624.3886 [email protected] FORTUNE FISH COMPANY FORGES SUSTAINABILITY PARTNERSHIP Netting American red snapper, for a cause (Bensenville, IL)— On April 1, 2012, Fortune Fish Company strengthened its commitment to sustainability by teaming with the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership (SFP), a non-profit organization whose mission is to engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains to rebuild depleted fish stocks and reduce the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming. Fortune Fish Company will work closely with SFP and its team of researchers and scientists to assess the sustainability of the seafood products it carries and identify necessary improvements. SFP will also assist Fortune in further developing the “Fortune Fish Sustainability Initiative.” Through this program, the company celebrates a seafood item every two months, while donating a portion of the proceeds to fund Fishery Improvement Projects. “Investing in Sustainability is investing in our future,” says Mark Palicki, vice president of marketing at Fortune Fish Company. “It isn’t enough to talk about sustainability – we need to actually fund programs that spearhead improvement. The Sustainable Fisheries Partnership is at the forefront of this movement, and we are excited to work with them and their Fishery Improvement Projects.” Throughout April and May, Fortune Fish Company will feature vertical hook and line- caught American Red Snapper. For every pound sold, a portion of proceeds support the Gulf of Mexico Reef Fish Fishery Improvement Project, which is dedicated to improving policies and fishing practices in the Gulf of Mexico and, by virtue, red snapper fishing.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Fillets (Parasites)
    Fish Fillets (Parasites) Generic HACCP Plan Updated 8/22/97 1. Product Description 2. Flow Diagram 3. Potential Hazards 4. Hazard Analysis Worksheet 5. HACCP Plan Form 1. Product Description Firm Name: ABC Fish Company Firm Address: Anywhere, USA Raw material: Arrowtooth flounder (Atheresthes stomias); Dover sole (Microstomus pacificus); English sole (Pleuronectes vetulus); Lingcod (Ophiodon elongatus); Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus); Pacific whiting (Merluccius spp.); Pacific sanddab (Citharichthys sordidus); Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.); Petrale sole (Eopsetta jordani); pollock ( Theragra chalcogramma ); Rex sole (Errex zachirus); Rockfish (Sebastes spp.); Sablefish (Anoplopoma fimbria); Sand sole (Psettichthys melanostictus); Starry flounder (Platichthys stellatus); Thornyhead/rockcod (Sebastolobus spp.) Finished Product: Fillets, fresh and frozen Packaging: Air-packaged Method of distribution and storage: Distributed and stored frozen, in ice or under refrigeration Intended use and consumer: To be fully cooked before consumption by the general public Return to Index 2. Flow Diagram Receiving Iced whole fish received directly from the harvester | Rinse Rinse with potable water | Sort Sort to remove ice and damaged fish | Iced Storage Top ice in holding area | Fillet Fillet by hand | Rinse Rinse with potable water | Skin Mechanically skin | Trim Trim by hand | | __ Blast Freeze Blast Freeze | | Pack/Label | Hand pack | | | Glaze Glaze with potable water | | Ice | Ice around containers | | | Pack/Label Hand pack | | Storage Storage Cooler at 40°F or below; freezer at 0°F or below Return to Index 3. Potential Hazards 1. Potential species-related hazards: (Fish and Fisheries Products Hazards & Controls Guide: First Edition) 1. Parasites (Arrowtooth flounder, English sole, Pacific cod, Pacific whiting, Pacific salmon, Petrale sole, Pollock, Rex sole, Rockfish, Sablefish, Sand sole, Starry flounder, Thornyhead/rockcod) 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Seafood Metrics Report Supplement: Industry Engagement Platforms
    Seafood Metrics Report Supplement: Industry Engagement Platforms (Updated) June 2018 Packard Foundation | Seafood Metrics Report Supplement | March 2018 | Page 1 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Preliminary takeaways 4 Precompetitive platform summary 6 Summary of companies and platform membership 7 Research on individual platforms Food Marketing Institute (FMI) Seafood Strategy Committee (SSC) 11 Foodservice Roundtable 12 Global Dialogue on Seafood Traceability 13 Global Salmon Initiative (GSI) 14 Global Sustainable Seafood Initiative (GSSI) 15 International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF) 16 National Fisheries Institute (NFI) Crab Council 17 Sea Pact 18 Seafood Business for Ocean Stewardship (SeaBOS) 19 Sustainable Fisheries Partnership (SFP) Supplier Roundtables 20 Seafood Task Force 21 World Economic Forum (WEF) Tuna 2020 Traceability Declaration 22 Appendix NGO engagement in sustainability platforms 25 List of companies only committed to one platform 26 Companies not committed to any platform, but working with an NGO partner 35 Packard Foundation | Seafood Metrics Report Supplement | March 2018 | Page 2 Introduction The 2017 Seafood Metrics Supplement is focused on precompetitive and other industry platforms that involve sustainable seafood. California Environmental Associates (CEA) conducted high-level, broad research on 12 precompetitive platforms, developing an inventory of readily available information on each platform, including: ▪ Membership. What companies are participating in each platform? ▪ Background. When and
    [Show full text]
  • Union Fish Company – Sample Product List
    100 Larkspur Landing Circle Telephone (415) 925-5280 Suite 115 Fax (415) 925-5283 Larkspur, CA 94939-1731 From Oahu: Tel 625-5750 Fax 625-6118 Established 1864 . UNION FISH COMPANY – SAMPLE PRODUCT LIST CEPHALOPODS Octopus, Slices – Cooked and Cut (Philippines) Octopus, Whole– Madako (African raw material, Japan processed) Octopus, Whole – Raw, Gutted, Cleaned (Philippines/Indonesia) Octopus, Whole – Yanagi (Japan) Squid, Arrow – Whole (New Zealand) Squid, Loligo – Tubes & Tentacles (China) Squid, Loligo – Tubes ONLY (China) Squid, Loligo – Whole (California) FILLETS & LOINS Grouper Fillets – Skinless, Natural (NOT CO Treated) (Indonesia) Hamachi Fillets – Skin-on, IVP, CO Treated (Japan) Hoki Fillets – Skinless (New Zealand) Mackerel, Horse [Aji] – Skin-on, Butterfly, IQF (Philippines) Mahimahi Fillets – Skin-on (Ecuador/Peru/Taiwan) Orange Roughy Fillets – Skinless (New Zealand) Snapper, Crimson [Opakapaka] Fillets – Skin-on, IQF, IPW (Indonesia/Philippines) Snapper, Scarlet Fillets – Skin-on, IQF, IPW (Indonesia) Swai Fillets [Pangasius hypophthalmus] – skinless (Vietnamese) Tuna, Skipjack [Aku] Loins – Skinless, Frozen-at-sea (Japan) Tuna, Yellowfin [Ahi] Loins – Skinless, Natural (NOT CO Treated) (Indonesia) Wahoo [Ono] Fillets – Skin-on (Japan/Taiwan) H&G & WHOLE FISH Anchovies – Whole Round (USA) Porgy [Tai Snapper] – Whole Round (New Zealand) Flounder – Whole, Gutted (New Zealand) Sardines – Whole Round (USA) Sable Fish [Blackcod/Butterfish] – J-cut: Collar Off, Gutted (USA) Salmon – H&G, Farmed (New Zealand) Scad [Galongong/Opelu]
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle Fish Company of New Mexico
    Center for Ethical Organizational Cultures Auburn University http://harbert.auburn.edu Seattle Fish Company of New Mexico: A Commitment to Sustainable Seafood INTRODUCTION Established in 1987, Seattle Fish Company of New Mexico distributes fresh and frozen fish and seafood to supermarkets, hotels, and restaurants across New Mexico and West Texas. Although there are several Seattle Fish Companies located across the United States, Seattle Fish Company of New Mexico is independently owned and operated. Seattle Fish Company of New Mexico has estimated annual sales of $20-50 million and 51 total employees. Seattle Fish Company of New Mexico’s slogan, “Sourced globally. Delivered locally” captures this company’s commitment to providing the highest quality seafood through global sourcing and traceability to ensure freshness. Although this company is fairly small, it has a big impact on the social issues of sustainable seafood and is a shining example of a sustainable company based in New Mexico. Sustainability refers to the potential long-term well -being of the natural environment as well as the interaction among nature and individuals, organizations, and business strategies. Sustainable business practices include the assessment and improvement of business strategies, economic sectors, work practices, technologies, and lifestyles while maintaining the natural environment. The nature of the seafood industry and international fishing markets create unique challenges for Seattle Fish Company of New Mexico in terms of sustainability and social responsibility. These challenges include sourcing seafood products that are farmed or fished in environmentally and socially responsible ways. This is a major concern because overfishing threatens entire populations of fish species and possibly the future viability of commercial fishing.
    [Show full text]
  • Fresh Fish Brunch Menu Final Print
    Champagne Sunday Brunch Sundays 10 a.m. – 2 p.m. ALL YOU CAN EAT $28.95, INCLUDES ONE GLASS OF CHAMPAGNE OR MIMOSA. NO SUBSTITUTIONS, PLEASE. Buffet *EZ PEEL AND EAT SHRIMP SHRIMP SCAMPI VANILLA FRENCH TOAST *SNOW CRAB LEGS, HOT OR COLD *COUNTRY SMOKED HAM ASSORTED BREAD AND PASTRIES APPLE HICKORY SMOKED SALMON * **LOX, BAGELS AND *CREAM CHEESE * **EGGS BENEDICT MALTED WAFFLES *KRAB SALAD CRAB EGGS FLORENTINE *MEDITERRANEAN VEGETABLE SALAD SCRAMBLED EGGS WITH GREEN CHILI *MADE-TO-ORDER OMELETS *SPINACH AND SHRIMP SALAD *HERRING IN WINE SAUCE CAESAR SALAD FETTUCCINI CRAB ALFREDO COUNTRY FRIED POTATOES *PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND MUSSELS *BREAKFAST SAUSAGE CLAM CHOWDER OYSTERS ROCKEF ELLER *HICKORY SMOKED BACON *SALMON PÂTÉ CINNAMON ROLLS AND MUFFINS *MIXED STEAMED VEGETABLES *Gluten Free **These items may be served raw or undercooked, or contain raw or undercooked ingredients. Consuming raw or undercooked meats, poultry, seafood, shellfish, or eggs may increase your risk of food-borne illness. Desserts "MAKE-YOUR-OWN" SUNDAE BAR FUDGE NUT BROWNIES *DARK CHOCOLATE FOUNTAIN *strawberries, *marshmallows and sponge CARROT CAKE *ASSORTED FRESH MELONS cake cubes TIRAMISU SPICED BREAD PUDDING PEACH COBBLER CHOCOLATE SOUFFLÉ CAKE MINI DONUTS CHEESECAKE *CRÈME BRULEE made fresh in our donut robot and tossed STRAWBERRY TRIFLE *CHOCOLATE MOUSSE with powdered sugar or cinnamon PINEAPPLE UPSIDE DOWN CAKE *KEY LIME MOUSSE *Gluten Free Brunch Cocktails Wines GLASS BOTTLE BLOODY MARY / 5.75 KENDALL JACKSON CHARDONNAY 10 39 MIMOSA / 4.75 Flavors of tropical
    [Show full text]
  • Kake-Seafood-Plant-Business-Plan
    February 2012 Business Plan Prepared for Haa Aani, LLC Photos courtesy Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute Prepared by In Association with RedPoint Associates Anchorage Kake Seafood Plant Business Plan Prepared for: Haa Aani, LLC PREPARED BY: Juneau Anchorage In Association With: RedPoint Associates Anchorage February 2012 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 1 Fish Supply ............................................................................................................................... 1 Equipment and Facility ............................................................................................................. 1 Labor and Employment ............................................................................................................ 2 Management ........................................................................................................................... 2 Marketing ................................................................................................................................ 2 Summary Assessment ............................................................................................................... 3 Financial Summary ................................................................................................................... 4 Feasibility Evaluation ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Fisheries 1969 Commercial Operators
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages Salmon Canneries 1-5 Shellfish Processors Fresh/Frozen and Cured Products Miscellaneous Products This statistical leaflet is designed to provide a list of commercial operators and the type of products they market. The leaflet reflects only those companies which actually processed fish or shellfish in Alaska during 1969. Non-operating companies involved in consolidation are not included. Many companies market their products through a wholesale outlet or brokerage firm. Persons interested in obtaining Alaskan seafood products should contact the companies mentioned in this leaflet. The leaflet is divided into four sections. At the beginning of each section is a graph which compares 1969 production to an average volume of production for that category. The average data presented in each graph is an average of three years production, 1967-1969. Production statistics for any particular year are available from the Alaska Department of Fish and Game. CANNED SALMON PRODUGTION In thousatids of standard 48 lb cases 1969 Production I Three year average = Pink ,, I SALMON CANNERIES Company Name and Address Plant Location Can Size Alaska Packers Association, Inc. Chignik 1 lb. E % lb. Box AA South Naknek 1 lb. E % lb. Blaine, Washington 98230 Larsen Bay 1 lb. E + lb. Alaska Star, Inc. Beluga River 1 lb: E + lb. smoked 1206 West 29th Place Spenard, Alaska 99503 Alaskan Smokey Joe's Seward % lb. Box 1381 Anchorage, Alaska 99502 Annette Islands Canning, Company Metlakatla 1 lb. E % lb. 504 Colman Building Seattle, Washington 98104 Bering Sea Fisheries, Inc. Lower Yukon River 1 lb. Route 2, Box 252 M/V Bering Sea Everett, Washington 98201 Bering Sea Processors, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Whiting Conservation Cooperative Request for Business Review Letter
    MUNDT. MACGREGOR, HAPPEL, FALCONER, ZULAUF & HALL ATTORNEYS AT LAW SPENCER HALL, JR. 4200 FIRST INTERSTATE CENTER JOHN H. CHUN JAY H. ZULAUF SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98104-4082 L. MARK EICHORN HENRY HOWARD HAPPEL, Ill FACSIMILE: (206) 624-5469 DAVID P. HOFFER WM. PAUL MACGREGOR KATHRYN Y. KIM (206) 624-5950 MICHAEL J. HYDE COLLEEN M. MARTIN J. DAVID STAHL LISA E. RIVELAND MATTHEW L. FICK JOE B. STANSELL JOHN WARNER WIDELL April 22, 1997 CHRISTOPHER R.M. STANTON W. SCOTT ZANZIG LIBBY A. WILLIAMS JOSEPH M. SULLIVAN JANETH. CHEETHAM OF COUNSEL Mr. Joel I. Klein Acting Assistant Attorney General Antitrust Division Department of Justice Tenth and Constitution Avenue, N.W. Room 3109 Washington, D.C. 20530 Re: Whiting Conservation Cooperative Request For Business Review Letter Dear Mr. Klein: We represent American Seafoods Company, a Washington corporation ( 11 American") . The purpose of this letter is to 11 11 request that the Department of Justice (the Department ) provide us with a statement of its enforcement intentions with respect to the proposed activity described below, pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 50.6. American, Alaska Ocean Seafood, Ltd., a Washington 11 11 limited partnership ( Alaska Ocean ), Glacier Fish Company, Ltd., 11 11 a Washington limited partnership ( Glacier ) and Tyson Seafood 11 11 Group, Inc., a Washington corporation ( Tyson ) (together, the 11 11 11 11 Members ) propose to form Whiting Conservation Cooperative ("Cooperative'') as a Washington cooperative corporation. Copies of draft Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws and a draft Membership Agreement of the Cooperative are enclosed for your reference. As more fully explained below, the Cooperative is intended to function as a harvesting association through which the Members would allocate among themselves certain percentages of the total available catch for the catcher/processor sector of the Pacific coast whiting fishery.
    [Show full text]