2021 Explanatory Notes – Agricultural Marketing Service 23-1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2021 Explanatory Notes – Agricultural Marketing Service 23-1 2021 EXPLANATORY NOTES – AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE Agency-Wide Purpose Statement………………………………………………………………………………...23-3 Lead-off Tabular Statement ........................................................................................................... 23-13 Available Funds and Staff Years................................................................................................... 23-14 Permanent Positions by Grade and Staff Years .......................................................................... 23-15 Vehicle Fleet .................................................................................................................................... 23-16 Shared Funding Projects ................................................................................................................ 23-18 Account 1: Marketing Services Lead-Off Tabular Statement .......................................................................................................... 23-20 Appropriations Language ............................................................................................................. 23-20 Project Statement ............................................................................................................................ 23-21 Justifications .................................................................................................................................... 23-22 Proposed Legislation ...................................................................................................................... 23-35 New Administrative Action .......................................................................................................... 23-35 Geographic Breakdown of Obligations and Staff Years ............................................................ 23-36 Classification by Objects ................................................................................................................ 23-38 Status of Programs .......................................................................................................................... 23-39 Limitation on Administrative Expenses (Cotton and Tobacco) ............................................... 23-95 Account 2: Payments to States and Possessions Lead-Off Tabular Statement .......................................................................................................... 23-97 Appropriations Language ............................................................................................................. 23-97 Project Statement ............................................................................................................................ 23-97 Justification ...................................................................................................................................... 23-97 Proposed Legislation ...................................................................................................................... 23-99 Geographic Breakdown of Obligations and Staff Years .......................................................... 23-100 Classification by Objects .............................................................................................................. 23-103 Status of Programs ........................................................................................................................ 23-105 Account 3: Limitation on Fee Funded Inspection and Weighing, and Examination Services Lead-Off Tabular Statement ........................................................................................................ 23-109 Appropriations Language ........................................................................................................... 23-109 Project Statement .......................................................................................................................... 23-109 Geographic Breakdown of Obligations and Staff Years .......................................................... 23-110 23-1 2021 EXPLANATORY NOTES – AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE Classification by Objects .............................................................................................................. 23-111 Status of Programs ........................................................................................................................ 23-113 Account 4: Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act Fund Lead-Off Tabular Statement ........................................................................................................ 23-115 Project Statement .......................................................................................................................... 23-115 Geographic Breakdown of Obligations and Staff Years .......................................................... 23-115 Status of Programs ........................................................................................................................ 23-117 Account 5: Funds for Strengthening Markets, Income and Supply (Section 32) Lead-Off Tabular Statement ........................................................................................................ 23-119 Appropriations Language ........................................................................................................... 23-119 Project Statement .......................................................................................................................... 23-120 Proposed Legislation .................................................................................................................... 23-122 New Administrative Action ........................................................................................................ 23-122 Geographic Breakdown of Obligations and Staff Years .......................................................... 23-123 Status of Programs ........................................................................................................................ 23-125 Summary of Performance ................................................................................................................ 23-133 23-2 2021 EXPLANATORY NOTES – AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE PURPOSE STATEMENT The mission of the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) is to facilitate the strategic marketing of agricultural products in domestic and international markets, while ensuring fair trading practices and promoting a competitive and efficient marketplace to the benefit of producers, traders, and consumers of U.S. food and fiber products. AMS carries out a wide range of programs under the authorization of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 as well as over 50 other statutes. More than half of the funds needed to finance AMS activities (excluding commodity purchase program funds) are derived from voluntary user fees. AMS also provides services for private industry and State/Federal agencies on a reimbursable basis. In addition, AMS conducts several appropriated program activities through cooperative arrangements with State Departments of Agriculture and other agencies. 1. Market News Service: The Market News program is authorized by the following statutes: Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 Agricultural and Food Act of 1981 (as amended by the Food Security Act of 1985) The Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 Cotton Statistics and Estimates Act of 1927 The Mandatory Price Reporting Act of 2010 Peanut Statistics Act Naval Stores Act Tobacco Inspection Act of 1935 U.S. Cotton Futures Act The AMS Market News service collects, analyzes, and disseminates current market information to assist producers and marketers of farm products and those in related industries in making critical daily decisions. Market News information covers local, regional, national, and international markets and includes data on supply, movement, contractual agreements, inventories, and prices for numerous agricultural commodities, both conventionally and organically produced. Reported commodities include cotton, cottonseed, and tobacco; dairy products; fruits, vegetables and ornamentals; livestock, meat, grains, poultry and eggs. 2. Shell Egg Surveillance and Standardization: These programs are authorized by the following statutes: Egg Products Inspection Act Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 a. Shell Egg Surveillance: AMS supports egg marketing by ensuring that cracked, leaking, or other types of “loss” (restricted) eggs are diverted from table egg consumption and by verifying that marketed eggs have a quality level of at least U.S. Consumer Grade B. AMS conducts this program, in cooperation with State Departments of Agriculture, to ensure that shell egg handling operations are inspected at least four 23-3 2021 EXPLANATORY NOTES – AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE times annually and hatcheries are inspected at least once each year to control the disposition of certain types of under grade and restricted eggs. This program diverts eggs that are not at least U.S. Consumer Grade B and cannot be sold in shell form to egg breaking plants, which reassures buyers and supports efficient markets. b. Standards Development: AMS develops, reviews, and maintains agricultural commodity standards that describe product quality attributes such as taste, color, texture, yield, weight, and physical condition for use in the trading of agricultural commodities. These standards provide a common language for buyers and sellers of commodities and are widely used by the agricultural industry in domestic
Recommended publications
  • Administrative Procedureâ•Fla Suggested Classification Of
    Washington University Law Review Volume 25 Issue 3 January 1940 Administrative Procedure—A Suggested Classification of Procedures of Regulatory Agencies in the United States Department of Agriculture Ashley Sellers United States Department of Agriculture Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview Part of the Administrative Law Commons, and the Agriculture Law Commons Recommended Citation Ashley Sellers, Administrative Procedure—A Suggested Classification of Procedures of Regulatory Agencies in the United States Department of Agriculture, 25 WASH. U. L. Q. 352 (1940). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol25/iss3/25 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 352 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY LAW QUARTERLY [Vol. 25 Saturday Morning, February 17 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE-A SUGGESTED CLASSIFICATION OF PROCEDURES OF REGULATORY AGENCIES IN THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ASHLEY SELLERSt The title requires both definition and delimitation. The terms "procedure," "regulatory," and "agencies" do not go unchal- lenged, especially in these days of symposia and institutes on administrative law. For present purposes, the term "procedure" will be given a restricted meaning and will be used, in a manner especially familiar to lawyers, to describe the methods and practices relat- ing to administrative hearings. Someone has called this the "full- dress" level of administrative procedure. This description, if applicable to the procedure of any administrative agency, is hardly descriptive of that of a bureau of the Department of Agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Management Agency
    2020 USDA EXPLANATORY NOTES – RISK MANAGEMENT AGENCY Agency-Wide ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Purpose Statement ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 OIG and GAO Reports ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Available Funds and Staff Years .............................................................................................................................. 4 Permanent Positions by Grade and Staff Years ........................................................................................................ 5 Vehicle Fleet ............................................................................................................................................................. 6 Shared Funding Projects- .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Account 1: Salaries and Expenses ................................................................................................................................. 9 Lead-Off Tabular Statement ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Appropriations Language.........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • What to Eat on the Autoimmune Protocol
    WHAT TO EAT ON THE AUTOIMMUNE PROTOCOL All the foods listed here are great to include in your It’s time to create an epidemic of - health. And it starts with learning ents that will help regulate your immune system and how to eat more nutrient-dense food. your hormones and provide the building blocks that your body needs to heal. You don’t need to eat all of these foods (it’s okay if snails, frog legs, and crickets aren’t your thing, and it’s okay if you just can’t get kangaroo meat or mizuna), but the idea is both to give Poultry innovative ways to increase variety and nutrient density • chicken • grouse • pigeon by exploring new foods. • dove • guinea hen • quail • duck • ostrich • turkey • emu • partridge (essentially, Red Meat • goose • pheasant any bird) • antelope • deer • mutton • bear • elk • pork • beaver • goat • rabbit • beef • hare • sea lion • • horse • seal • boar • kangaroo • whale • camel • lamb (essentially, • caribou • moose any mammal) Amphibians and Reptiles • crocodile • frog • snake • turtle 1 22 Fish* Shellfish • anchovy • gar • • abalone • limpet • scallop • Arctic char • haddock • salmon • clam • lobster • shrimp • Atlantic • hake • sardine • cockle • mussel • snail croaker • halibut • shad • conch • octopus • squid • barcheek • herring • shark • crab • oyster • whelk goby • John Dory • sheepshead • • periwinkle • bass • king • silverside • • prawn • bonito mackerel • smelt • bream • lamprey • snakehead • brill • ling • snapper • brisling • loach • sole • carp • mackerel • • • mahi mahi • tarpon • cod • marlin • tilapia • common dab • • • conger • minnow • trout • crappie • • tub gurnard • croaker • mullet • tuna • drum • pandora • turbot Other Seafood • eel • perch • walleye • anemone • sea squirt • fera • plaice • whiting • caviar/roe • sea urchin • • pollock • • *See page 387 for Selenium Health Benet Values.
    [Show full text]
  • RECIPE CERTIFICATION PROGRAM GUIDE MAY 2019 WELCOME! Congratulations on Choosing to Connect Your Company and Brand with Consumers’ Interest in Heart Health
    HEART-CHECK RECIPE CERTIFICATION PROGRAM GUIDE MAY 2019 WELCOME! Congratulations on choosing to connect your company and brand with consumers’ interest in heart health. Together, we can help consumers make heart-smart food and recipe choices. The following information serves as your step-by-step “how- to” program guide and provides all the information you need to navigate the certification process and then begin to leverage the certification of your recipes(s) by using the Heart-Check mark on your website, social media platforms, and in other promotional materials. The iconic Heart-Check mark has been on food packages and in the grocery store since 1995 helping consumers identify foods that can be building blocks of a heart- healthy diet. Now, recipes that meet requirements based on the sound science of the American Heart Association® can also be certified. This offers consumers a bridge from heart-healthy foods to an overall heart-healthy dietary pattern using heart- healthy recipes. Heart-Check certification provides added credibility for your brand, boosts your visibility, and helps your company connect with health-conscious consumers. Seeing the Heart-Check mark on a recipe assures consumers they are making a smart choice. As a program participant, you enjoy these benefits: • INDEPENDENT EVALUATION BY A NUTRITIONAL LEADER. The American Heart Association is one of the nation’s most recognized brands. Consumers seek our guidance on nutrition and heart-healthy living. Certification from the American Heart Association is especially meaningful to consumers because it signifies the independent voice of a trusted health organization. • BOOST YOUR BRAND’S VISIBILITY.
    [Show full text]
  • Take Away Menu
    HEALTH BAR Smoothies Cold Pessed Juices LOCATIONS POPEYE PUNCH MANGO TANGO GATEWAY PURA VIDA spinach, pineapple, mango, orange, banana, TO GREEN carrot, apple, orange, lemon SOUTH END / CHARLOTTE banana, hemp protein, cayenne, maple syrup, kale, apple, orange, 8.95 704 333 0008 apple juice 9 coconut milk 9 lemon, ginger 8.95 2000 South Blvd. Suite 300 VOLCANO FLYING LUCY EL LUCHADOR TREE OF LIFE orange, lemon, grapefruit, Charlotte NC 28203 spinach, pineapple, banana, banana, peanuts, raw cacao, kale, spinach, parsley, maple syrup, cayenne 8.95 ginger, spirulina, lemonade 9 hemp milk 9 celery, cucumber, lemon, ginger 8.95 POWER CLEANSER SOUTHPARK / CHARLOTTE CHARLIE BROWN CACAO CACAO carrot, cucumber, beet, celery banana, berries, peanut butter, banana, cacao nibs, cacao ALMOND MILK 8.95 704 802 7772 peanuts, apple juice 9 powder, almond milk 9 raw sprouted almonds, coco- 4521 Sharon Rd. Suite 175 nut palm nectar, filtered ZINGER Take Away PINA˜ COLADA OGRE water, vanilla, salt 8.95 beet, apple, orange, lemon, Charlotte NC 28211 pineapple, banana, our cacao cacao smoothie ginger 8.95 coconut milk 9 with a kick of coffee 9 GOLDEN ROOTS carrot, pineapple, turmeric, KALE PEARADISE RALEIGH YOU’RE PINKO DRINKO ginger, lemon 8.95 kale, pear, pineapple, KALE’IN ME orange, berries, banana, acai, cucumber, fennel 8.95 919 324 3515 kale, spinach, cucumber, ginger, lemonade 9 Charter Square Building Menu pineapple, cilantro, kale lemonade 9 GREY HULK Pobiotic Milks 555 Fayetteville St. Suite 100 berries, banana, spirulina, GOLDEN MILK CHOCOLATE
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Management Agency (RMA) and the 2018 Farm Bill
    What’s New: Risk Management Agency (RMA) and the 2018 Farm Bill Overview • The 2018 Farm Bill makes several improvements to existing insurance products, speeds the creation of numerous new products, and strengthens the integrity of the program through new outreach and compliance requirements. Improved Prices and Actuarial Data • Actuarial operations, like determining price elections and yields, will use more internal USDA data, including data from the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) and Farm Service Agency (FSA). Specialty Crops • Allows for the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) to offer policies for industrial hemp. • Creates Specialty Crop Liaisons in each RMA Regional Office. • Creates a dedicated Specialty Crop website. • Requires RMA to submit to the Board, for consideration, more specialty crop insurance products and expansions for existing specialty crop insurance. Conservation and Cover Cropping • Specifies cover cropping as a good farming practice if done per Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) guidelines. • Clarifies insurability of subsequent crops and the applicability of the summer fallow practice. • Segments penalties for native sod on land tilled between current and 2014 Farm Bills. • Limits penalties for newly tilled land on native sod to four cumulative years. New Policy Features • Allows for an enterprise unit to include land across county lines. • Requires underwriting rules to cap individual actual production history declines at 10 percent when due to insurable causes of loss. • Creates a Veteran Farmer or Rancher category so veteran farmers will receive additional benefits. Underserved Producers • Requires recurring study to increase participation in states and for underserved producers. • Defines Beginning Farmer as having not held an insurable interest for more than 10 years for the Whole Farm Revenue Protection Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Tapping – It's Not Just for Maples Anymore Cornell University Seeks
    Tapping – It’s Not Just for Maples Anymore Cornell University Seeks Collaborators for Birch Syrup Research Richard Gast; Extension Educator – Natural Resources Cornell Cooperative Extension of Franklin Country Making pure, rich, delicious maple syrup is a North Country tradition, an important cottage industry, and an increasingly important part of the region’s economy. There’s pride and care in every gallon of maple syrup made. Maple syrup-producing farm and forest businesses are family owned. Those families put a lot of love and devotion into producing the finest maple syrup that money can buy. Many of them also make mouthwatering, pure maple candy, scrumptious maple cream, and delightful granulated maple sugar. They tap thousands of trees. Their standards are high. And the quality of their maple products is consistently excellent. In our region, maple sap typically flows best from mid-March through mid-April, during periods when days are warm, but nighttime temperatures fall below freezing. That cycle of warming and cooling is essential. Should temperatures linger above or below freezing, sap flow will stop. If overall conditions are too warm or too cool, the season will be a poor sap-production season. And once it warms up to where the buds on the trees begin to swell and break dormancy, the chemical makeup of the sap changes, causing off-flavors to develop, at which time the sap is no longer satisfactory for maple syrup. Root pressure and transpiration, the mechanism by which water is transported in stems during the growing season, does not cause sap flow in maples during the sugaring season.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture Big Data (Agbd) Challenges and Opportunities from Farm to Table: a Midwest
    Agriculture Big Data (AgBD) Challenges and Opportunities From Farm To Table: A Midwest Big Data Hub Community† Whitepaper Shashi Shekhar1, Patrick Schnable2, David LeBauer3, Katherine Baylis4 and Kim VanderWaal5 1 Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities 2 Dept. of Agronomy, Dept. of Genetics, Development and Cell Biology, Iowa State University 3 Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 4 Dept. of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 5 Dept. of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Abstract: Big data is critical to help agriculture meet the challenges of growing world population, climate change and urbanization. Recent success stories include precision agriculture, phenotyping, and global agricultural monitoring. Many of these initiatives are made possible by novel data sources such as satellite imagery, instrumented tractors and initiatives such as the Global Open Data for Agriculture and Nutrition (GODAN). This whitepaper surveys agricultural big datasets, characterizes their limitations, lists transformative opportunities and suggests a plan to engage and nurture Agriculture Big Data (AgBD) research community. Public big data includes satellite imagery (e.g., Earth on Amazon Web Services, Google Earth Engine), surveys (e.g., National Agricultural Statistics Service), financial statistics (e.g., Economic Research Service), social media (e.g., Twitter), etc. Private datasets describe yield (e.g., precision agriculture, Farm Service Agency), farm loss (e.g., Risk Management Agency) and condemnation (Food Safety and Inspection Service), etc. Limitations include data and metadata gaps, insufficient data storage, preservation, and documentation, lack of scalable spatiotemporal big data analytics methods, and inadequate secure data-sharing mechanisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Directive MRP 4501.1 12/4/07
    United States Department of Agriculture Marketing and Regulatory Programs Agricultural Marketing Service Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration Directive MRP 4501.1 12/4/07 ELECTRONIC STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND LEAVE (SEL) 1. PURPOSE This Directive establishes Marketing and Regulatory Programs (MRP) policy on electronic statement of earnings and leave (SEL). 2. AUTHORITIES a. USDA Memorandum, Electronic Statement of Earnings and Leave Memo, dated February 20, 2007. b. National Finance Center (NFC) Bulletin 07-8, Electronic Statement of Earnings and leave and Print Waiver Submission Instructions, dated April 11, 2007. c. USDA Memorandum, “Paperless” Statements of Earnings and Leave, dated April 19, 2007. 3. BACKGROUND By memorandum dated February 20, 2007, the USDA decided to eliminate the printed and mailed SEL to reduce payroll expenses. The SEL is available to all employees via the Employee Personal Page (EPP) on NFC’s website. Members of the Senior Executive Service stopped receiving mailed SELs beginning pay period 8 (April 15, 2007). The remainder of employees will receive advance notice of the actual implementation date in the mailed SEL. 4. POLICY It is MRP policy that: a. SELs will be accessed electronically by employees using the EPP. b. Employees who do not have regular access to a computer with internet capability at their worksite may request a waiver using MRP Form 350, Statement of Earnings and Leave (SEL) Waiver Request Form (or Cancellation), see Attachment 1. Distribution: AMS, APHIS, GIPSA Originating Office: MRPHR-ECCPB c. Waivers must be submitted and approved at least a full pay period before the pay period to be implemented to allow time for processing.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina FSA June 2014 Electronic Monthly Newsletter
    North Carolina FSA June 2014 Electronic Monthly Newsletter USDA Announces Planting and harvesting fruits, participation in programs vegetables and wild rice on established by the 2014 Farm Bill Changes to Fruit, ARC/PLC acreage is subject to the will mean for their businesses. Vegetable and Wild Rice acre-for-acre payment reduction North Carolina State University Planting Rules when those crops are planted on receives $57,460. North Carolina either more than 15 percent of the A&T State University receives Farm Service Agency (FSA) base acres of a farm enrolled in $24,907. has announced fruit, vegetable and ARC using the county coverage or wild rice provisions that affect PLC, or more than 35 percent of The University of Illinois (lead the base acres of a farm enrolled in for the National Coalition for producers who intend to participate ARC using the individual coverage. Producer Education), along with in certain programs authorized by the Food and Agricultural Policy the Agricultural Act of 2014. Fruits, vegetables and wild rice Research Institute (FAPRI) at the that are planted in an approved University of Missouri and the double-cropping practice will not Agricultural and Food Policy Producers who intend to cause a payment reduction if the Center at Texas A&M (co-leads for participate in the Agriculture Risk farm is in a double-cropping region the National Association of Coverage (ARC) or Price Loss as designated by the USDA’s Agricultural and Food Policy), will Coverage (PLC) programs are Commodity Credit Corporation. receive a total of $3 million to subject to an acre-for-acre develop the new online tools and payment reduction when fruits and train state-based extension agents nuts, vegetables or wild rice are who can in turn help educate planted on the payment acres of a USDA Awarding $6 farmers.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 113 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 113 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 160 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, MAY 29, 2014 No. 82 Senate The Senate was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Friday, May 30, 2014, at 2 p.m. House of Representatives THURSDAY, MAY 29, 2014 The House met at 10 a.m. and was ment that my colleagues and I were proach me at Memorial Day events to called to order by the Speaker pro tem- prevented from offering an amendment say that they agree that Afghanistan is pore (Mr. BENTIVOLIO). to the NDAA dealing with the constitu- not worth the blood that has been shed f tional responsibility of Congress to de- there. Furthermore, they agreed with clare war. me that Afghanistan is not worth DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO Like many Members of Congress, I America continuing to borrow money TEMPORE had the opportunity to speak at events from foreign nations, driving up fur- The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- on Saturday, Sunday, and Monday on ther the debt of our Nation to fund fore the House the following commu- Memorial Day weekend. Every time I President Karzai’s corrupt government nication from the Speaker: spoke, I mentioned my frustration that when we have a multitude of problems WASHINGTON, DC, the McGovern-Jones amendment was and needs right here in America. May 29, 2014. not able to be brought to the floor for Mr. Speaker, I would like to close my I hereby appoint the Honorable KERRY L.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Animal Law Update Seminar Handbook
    2015 Animal Law Update CLE Seminar Presented by the Kentucky Bar Association Animal Law Section Kentucky Bar Association 514 West Main Street Frankfort, Kentucky 40601 502.564.3795 www.kybar.org The Kentucky Bar Association Animal Law Section presents: 2015 Animal Law Update This program has been approved in Kentucky for 5.00 CLE credits including 0.00 Ethics credits. Compiled and Edited by: The Kentucky Bar Association Office of Continuing Legal Education for Kentucky Bar Association Animal Law Section © 2015 All Rights Reserved Published and Printed by: The Kentucky Bar Association, February 2015. Editor’s Note: The materials included in this Animal Law Update seminar book are intended to provide current and accurate information about the subject matter covered. The program materials were compiled for you by volunteer authors. No representation or warranty is made concerning the application of the legal or other principles discussed by the instructors to any specific fact situation, nor is any prediction made concerning how any particular judge or jury will interpret or apply such principles. The proper interpretation or application of the principles discussed is a matter for the considered judgment of the individual legal practitioner. The faculty and staff of the Kentucky Bar Association disclaim liability therefor. Attorneys using these materials or information otherwise conveyed during the program, in dealing with a specific legal matter, have a duty to research original and current sources of authority. 2015 Animal Law Update CLE Seminar Table of Contents Agenda............................................................................................................................. i Speakers ........................................................................................................................ iii Kentucky Animal Cruelty Statutes, Case Law and Collaboration between Prosecutors and Law Enforcement .................................................................................
    [Show full text]