Case of the Missing Ceres Family

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Case of the Missing Ceres Family 45th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2014) 1649.pdf THE CASE OF THE MISSING CERES FAMILY. A. S. Rivkin1 and E. Asphaug2, 1JHU/APL, Laurel, MD, USA ([email protected]). 2Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA. Introduction: Most of the largest asteroids in the If a Ceres family exists, it is exceedingly unlikely to main belt are associated with an impact-generated dy- have escaped detection. namical family. The Vesta family dominates the inner Dodging bullets? Could Ceres have simply asteroid belt with its numbers [1-2], and was a critical avoided making a family? Given that it is the largest piece of evidence in tying the HED meteorites to Ves- asteroid, and thus the biggest target, it is exceedingly ta. In addition to Vesta (the third-largest asteroid), Pal- unlikely that it would have avoided impact by a sizable las (the second-largest asteroid), Hygiea (the fourth- smaller asteroid. However, it might be argued that the largest asteroid), and the largest S-class asteroid, 15 escape speed for Ceres, ∼0.5 km/s, would suppress Eunomia, all have dynamical families [3-6]. family formation, as it is higher than that of any other Twelve asteroids in the current main belt have di- body in the asteroid belt. The amount of ejecta escap- ameters over 250 km, containing two-thirds of the as- ing from Ceres might be reduced, compared to similar- teroid belt’s mass. In addition, [7] estimated that two sized impacts occurring on lower-gravity asteroids; of the largest present-day families, Themis and Eos, and the energy required to escape might lead to highly had parent bodies in the ~300-400 km size range where comminuted fragments or even vaporization. we find Hygiea, Pallas, and Vesta today. In total, ten of Assuming Ceres and Vesta have experienced a the 14 known 250+ km bodies in the past or present comparable bombardment, Ceres’ greater escape ve- asteroid belt are associated with dynamical families, locity should lead to a smaller amount of ejecta escap- either of the smaller “cratering” type, dominated by a ing, roughly 2/3 what would escape Vesta. Half as major body and relatively small fragments, or large much would escape Ceres as Pallas, and only 1/4 as disruptions (impact energy Q > Q∗D) that indicate much as Hygiea, for a similar impact event, leading to gravity-dominated catastrophic events. It is curious, the expectation of a less prominent family for Ceres. then, that the very largest body in the asteroid belt, However, while the amount of escaping ejecta from a Ceres, is missing from this list of parents. given impact event may be reduced, this is more than Ceres is unassociated with any sort of family at all made up for by Ceres experiencing more massive as as far as we know. This alone is perhaps not sufficient well as more frequent impact events. For example, the to draw any conclusion, but motivates us towards the model of [8] predicts 2.5 impacts of 40-km bodies into considerations we make here. We hope to show that Vesta over 4.5 Gy, implying 7-8 similarly-sized im- the lack of a family has implications for Ceres’ internal pacts into Ceres over the same time period. [9] simu- structure, and further hope to encourage research be- lated the cratering rate on Ceres and Vesta, providing yond the scope of this work – geodynamical, chemical comparable results. They find that the largest expected and collisional modeling – that can provide additional impactor on Ceres is ∼70 km in diameter (similar in firm constraints. size to the impactor that created the Vesta family [10]), Hiding out? Could the Ceres family be hiding and they expect Ceres to have nearly 50 craters over somewhere? It could be argued that the size limit of a 100 km in diameter. Interestingly, hints of surface Ceres family is smaller than what has been catalogued features consistent with impact basins of the sizes ex- in the main asteroid belt. However, that seems unlike- pected are found in HST- and AO-derived albedo maps ly. The limiting absolute magnitude for completeness of Ceres [11-12]. Two particularly large albedo fea- in the Minor Planet Center database is H ≈ 15 for the tures (diameters 180 and 350 km) are interpreted as middle asteroid belt where Ceres resides [2], corre- impact basins by [12], and the latter feature in particu- sponding to a threshold diameter of ∼ 4 km for objects lar is consistent with a family-forming size based on with Ceres-like albedo. For comparison, the second- the impact scaling. The larger feature is also compara- largest members of the Pallas, Vesta, and Sylvia fami- ble to the size one would expect for a 70-km impactor lies have diameters in the 10-25 km range, and many hitting Ceres at 5 km/s (400-500 km final diameter, of the other families containing asteroids with diame- consistent with the estimates of [9]. Given all of this, ters >250 km also contain additional asteroids with there is no obvious impediment to creating a Ceres diameters of 75 km or larger. For comparison, the fam- family. ily associated with 128 Nemesis, a C-class asteroid Collisional or dynamical erosion? Just as colli- near Ceres’ location in the middle asteroid belt has sions create families, so they eventually destroy them. over 250 identified family members with H ≤ 15 [4]. Given enough time, the members of a collisional fami- ly will be ground down. It may be argued that the cur- 45th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2014) 1649.pdf rent lack of a Ceres family is simply a consequence of even higher, approaching 210 K. This is noteworthy timing and inevitable erosion rather than providing because Ganymede is not a low-albedo object (geomet- insight into Ceres itself. [8] modeled the collisional ric albedo 0.6, bond albedo 0.42), and is thought to and dynamical evolution of the asteroid belt as a have only a few tens of percent of non-ice material at whole, and found the collisional lifetime of 1- its surface at most (Hibbitts, personal communication). km bodies approached 1 Gyr. This collisional lifetime While cometary sublimation eventually ceases due estimate suggests that a sizable fraction of 1-km and to lag deposit generation, the relatively clean ice ex- larger objects in any Ceres family should still exist pected in Ceres’ mantle provides much less opportuni- regardless of when an impact took place. ty for material to build up. Sublimation also provides a Nor should drift due to Yarkovsky forces play a plausible mechanism for preventing lag deposit for- major role in the removal of km-scale Ceres family mation in the first place on members of a Ceres family objects. The nearest strong resonance, the 5:2 mean as gas flow removes particles. A 20-km body with motion resonance with Jupiter, is at 2.82 AU. This is Ganymede’s albedo at 2.77 AU can eject 160-µm di- about 500 Myr away at the quoted, ideal drift rates for ameter grains at its equator. At ±30o and poleward lati- 1-km objects [8]. However, the diurnal Yarkovsky drift tudes, only 1-10-µm grains can be ejected, but if a lag will either shrink or expand orbits depending up- deposit were begun, it should darken and warm by 5- on whether an object is a retrograde or prograde spin- 10 K on the timescale of 10-100 My, perhaps leading ner and therefore only half of the objects could be ex- to outbursts at those latitudes as increased gas flux can pected to move toward the 5:2 resonance, with half eject more massive particles. Smaller bodies, with less moving away from it. Taking this into account, and gravity, can eject potential lag deposit particles even at noting the quoted rate is a maximum rate, and that higher latitudes and lower temperatures. This admitted- larger objects will drift more slowly, it seems unlikely ly simplistic view ignores the effects of obliquity, that a Ceres family can be removed in toto via drift to a shape changes, volumetric changes as ice heats and resonance and subsequent evolution to planet-crossing cools, and other factors, but those should not change behavior. If a Ceres family is created, and it is like the overall conclusion. Indeed, shape changes concep- other asteroid families in its nature, it is unlikely to tually could lead to additional stresses on small ob- have been erased. jects, which in turn could lead to fracturing that would Sublimation of an icy family? It is also possible aid the sublimation process, and non-zero obliquity that rather than suffering collisional or dynamical ero- would increase the fraction of the body experiencing sion, any once-existing Ceres family experienced sub- sub-solar temperatures and increase the overall subli- limation. Ceres’ shape and moment of inertia have mation rate. been interpreted as indicating an ice shell above a rocky core [13], in agreement with thermal evolution References: [1] Binzel R. P. and Xu S. (1993) Sci- models [14-15]. However, the surface of Ceres is too ence, 260, 186-191. [2] DeMeo F. and Carry B. (2013) warm to maintain ice for significantly long periods of Icarus, 226, 723-741. [3] Gil-Hutton R. (2006) Icarus, time (save very near the poles), and the retreat rate of 183, 93-100. [4] Nesvorny D. (2012) NASA Planetary ice does not reach m/Gy speeds until it reaches a depth Data System. [5] Carruba V. (2013) Mon. Not. Royal of order ∼100-1000 m (depending upon latitude and Ast.
Recommended publications
  • 2016 Publication Year 2020-12-21T10:07:06Z
    Publication Year 2016 Acceptance in OA@INAF 2020-12-21T10:07:06Z Title Spectral characterization of V-type asteroids - II. A statistical analysis Authors IEVA, Simone; DOTTO, Elisabetta; Lazzaro, D.; PERNA, Davide; Fulvio, D.; et al. DOI 10.1093/mnras/stv2510 Handle http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12386/29033 Journal MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY Number 455 MNRAS 455, 2871–2888 (2016) doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2510 Spectral characterization of V-type asteroids – II. A statistical analysis S. Ieva,1‹ E. Dotto,1 D. Lazzaro,2 D. Perna,3 D. Fulvio4 and M. Fulchignoni3 1INAF–Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, via Frascati 33, I-00040 Monteporzio Catone (Roma), Italy 2Observatorio Nacional, Rua General Jose´ Cristino, 77 – Sao˜ Cristov´ ao,˜ Rio de Janeiro – RJ-20921-400, Brazil 3LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University, CNRS, Sorbonne Universites,´ UPMC Univ. Paris 06, Univ. Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cite,´ 5 place Jules Janssen, F-92195 Meudon, France 4Departamento de Fis´ıca, Pontif´ıcia Universidade Catolica´ do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Marques de Sao˜ Vicente 225, Rio de Janeiro 22451-900, Brazil Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/455/3/2871/2892629 by guest on 06 November 2020 Accepted 2015 October 23. Received 2015 October 22; in original form 2015 August 9 ABSTRACT In recent years, several small basaltic V-type asteroids have been identified all around the main belt. Most of them are members of the Vesta dynamical family, but an increasingly large number appear to have no link with it. The question that arises is whether all these basaltic objects do indeed come from Vesta.
    [Show full text]
  • ESO's VLT Sphere and DAMIT
    ESO’s VLT Sphere and DAMIT ESO’s VLT SPHERE (using adaptive optics) and Joseph Durech (DAMIT) have a program to observe asteroids and collect light curve data to develop rotating 3D models with respect to time. Up till now, due to the limitations of modelling software, only convex profiles were produced. The aim is to reconstruct reliable nonconvex models of about 40 asteroids. Below is a list of targets that will be observed by SPHERE, for which detailed nonconvex shapes will be constructed. Special request by Joseph Durech: “If some of these asteroids have in next let's say two years some favourable occultations, it would be nice to combine the occultation chords with AO and light curves to improve the models.” 2 Pallas, 7 Iris, 8 Flora, 10 Hygiea, 11 Parthenope, 13 Egeria, 15 Eunomia, 16 Psyche, 18 Melpomene, 19 Fortuna, 20 Massalia, 22 Kalliope, 24 Themis, 29 Amphitrite, 31 Euphrosyne, 40 Harmonia, 41 Daphne, 51 Nemausa, 52 Europa, 59 Elpis, 65 Cybele, 87 Sylvia, 88 Thisbe, 89 Julia, 96 Aegle, 105 Artemis, 128 Nemesis, 145 Adeona, 187 Lamberta, 211 Isolda, 324 Bamberga, 354 Eleonora, 451 Patientia, 476 Hedwig, 511 Davida, 532 Herculina, 596 Scheila, 704 Interamnia Occultation Event: Asteroid 10 Hygiea – Sun 26th Feb 16h37m UT The magnitude 11 asteroid 10 Hygiea is expected to occult the magnitude 12.5 star 2UCAC 21608371 on Sunday 26th Feb 16h37m UT (= Mon 3:37am). Magnitude drop of 0.24 will require video. DAMIT asteroid model of 10 Hygiea - Astronomy Institute of the Charles University: Josef Ďurech, Vojtěch Sidorin Hygiea is the fourth-largest asteroid (largest is Ceres ~ 945kms) in the Solar System by volume and mass, and it is located in the asteroid belt about 400 million kms away.
    [Show full text]
  • Asteroid Family Ages. 2015. Icarus 257, 275-289
    Icarus 257 (2015) 275–289 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Icarus journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus Asteroid family ages ⇑ Federica Spoto a,c, , Andrea Milani a, Zoran Knezˇevic´ b a Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Pisa, Largo Pontecorvo 5, 56127 Pisa, Italy b Astronomical Observatory, Volgina 7, 11060 Belgrade 38, Serbia c SpaceDyS srl, Via Mario Giuntini 63, 56023 Navacchio di Cascina, Italy article info abstract Article history: A new family classification, based on a catalog of proper elements with 384,000 numbered asteroids Received 6 December 2014 and on new methods is available. For the 45 dynamical families with >250 members identified in this Revised 27 April 2015 classification, we present an attempt to obtain statistically significant ages: we succeeded in computing Accepted 30 April 2015 ages for 37 collisional families. Available online 14 May 2015 We used a rigorous method, including a least squares fit of the two sides of a V-shape plot in the proper semimajor axis, inverse diameter plane to determine the corresponding slopes, an advanced error model Keywords: for the uncertainties of asteroid diameters, an iterative outlier rejection scheme and quality control. The Asteroids best available Yarkovsky measurement was used to estimate a calibration of the Yarkovsky effect for each Asteroids, dynamics Impact processes family. The results are presented separately for the families originated in fragmentation or cratering events, for the young, compact families and for the truncated, one-sided families. For all the computed ages the corresponding uncertainties are provided, and the results are discussed and compared with the literature. The ages of several families have been estimated for the first time, in other cases the accu- racy has been improved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Solar System
    5 The Solar System R. Lynne Jones, Steven R. Chesley, Paul A. Abell, Michael E. Brown, Josef Durech,ˇ Yanga R. Fern´andez,Alan W. Harris, Matt J. Holman, Zeljkoˇ Ivezi´c,R. Jedicke, Mikko Kaasalainen, Nathan A. Kaib, Zoran Kneˇzevi´c,Andrea Milani, Alex Parker, Stephen T. Ridgway, David E. Trilling, Bojan Vrˇsnak LSST will provide huge advances in our knowledge of millions of astronomical objects “close to home’”– the small bodies in our Solar System. Previous studies of these small bodies have led to dramatic changes in our understanding of the process of planet formation and evolution, and the relationship between our Solar System and other systems. Beyond providing asteroid targets for space missions or igniting popular interest in observing a new comet or learning about a new distant icy dwarf planet, these small bodies also serve as large populations of “test particles,” recording the dynamical history of the giant planets, revealing the nature of the Solar System impactor population over time, and illustrating the size distributions of planetesimals, which were the building blocks of planets. In this chapter, a brief introduction to the different populations of small bodies in the Solar System (§ 5.1) is followed by a summary of the number of objects of each population that LSST is expected to find (§ 5.2). Some of the Solar System science that LSST will address is presented through the rest of the chapter, starting with the insights into planetary formation and evolution gained through the small body population orbital distributions (§ 5.3). The effects of collisional evolution in the Main Belt and Kuiper Belt are discussed in the next two sections, along with the implications for the determination of the size distribution in the Main Belt (§ 5.4) and possibilities for identifying wide binaries and understanding the environment in the early outer Solar System in § 5.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Color Study of Asteroid Families Within the MOVIS Catalog David Morate1,2, Javier Licandro1,2, Marcel Popescu1,2,3, and Julia De León1,2
    A&A 617, A72 (2018) Astronomy https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201832780 & © ESO 2018 Astrophysics Color study of asteroid families within the MOVIS catalog David Morate1,2, Javier Licandro1,2, Marcel Popescu1,2,3, and Julia de León1,2 1 Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias (IAC), C/Vía Láctea s/n, 38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain e-mail: [email protected] 2 Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna, 38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 3 Astronomical Institute of the Romanian Academy, 5 Cu¸titulde Argint, 040557 Bucharest, Romania Received 6 February 2018 / Accepted 13 March 2018 ABSTRACT The aim of this work is to study the compositional diversity of asteroid families based on their near-infrared colors, using the data within the MOVIS catalog. As of 2017, this catalog presents data for 53 436 asteroids observed in at least two near-infrared filters (Y, J, H, or Ks). Among these asteroids, we find information for 6299 belonging to collisional families with both Y J and J Ks colors defined. The work presented here complements the data from SDSS and NEOWISE, and allows a detailed description− of− the overall composition of asteroid families. We derived a near-infrared parameter, the ML∗, that allows us to distinguish between four generic compositions: two different primitive groups (P1 and P2), a rocky population, and basaltic asteroids. We conducted statistical tests comparing the families in the MOVIS catalog with the theoretical distributions derived from our ML∗ in order to classify them according to the above-mentioned groups. We also studied the background populations in order to check how similar they are to their associated families.
    [Show full text]
  • Ice& Stone 2020
    Ice & Stone 2020 WEEK 51: DECEMBER 13-19 Presented by The Earthrise Institute # 51 Authored by Alan Hale COMET OF THE WEEK: The Great Comet of 1680 Perihelion: 1680 December 18.49, q = 0.006 AU The Great Comet of 1680 over Rotterdam in The Netherlands, during late December 1680 as painted by the Dutch artist Lieve Verschuier. This particular comet was undoubtedly one of the brightest comets of the 17th Century, but it is also one of the most important comets in history from a scientific perspective, and perhaps even from the perspective of overall human history. While there were certainly plenty of superstitions attached to the comet’s appearance, the scientific investigations made of it were among the beginnings of the era in European history we now call The Enlightenment, and indeed, in a sense the Great Comet of 1680 can perhaps be considered as one of the sparks of that era. The significance began with the comet’s discovery, which was made on the morning of November 14, 1680, by a German astronomer residing in Coburg, Gottfried Kirch – the first comet ever to be discovered by means of a telescope. It was already around 4th magnitude at that time, and located near the star Regulus in the constellation Leo; from that point it traveled eastward and brightened rapidly, being closest to Earth (0.42 AU) on November 30. By that time it was a conspicuous naked-eye object with a tail 20 to 30 degrees long, and it remained visible for another week before disappearing into morning twilight.
    [Show full text]
  • Asteroid Family Identification 613
    Bendjoya and Zappalà: Asteroid Family Identification 613 Asteroid Family Identification Ph. Bendjoya University of Nice V. Zappalà Astronomical Observatory of Torino Asteroid families have long been known to exist, although only recently has the availability of new reliable statistical techniques made it possible to identify a number of very “robust” groupings. These results have laid the foundation for modern physical studies of families, thought to be the direct result of energetic collisional events. A short summary of the current state of affairs in the field of family identification is given, including a list of the most reliable families currently known. Some likely future developments are also discussed. 1. INTRODUCTION calibrate new identification methods. According to the origi- nal papers published in the literature, Brouwer (1951) used The term “asteroid families” is historically linked to the a fairly subjective criterion to subdivide the Flora family name of the Japanese researcher Kiyotsugu Hirayama, who delineated by Hirayama. Arnold (1969) assumed that the was the first to use the concept of orbital proper elements to asteroids are dispersed in the proper-element space in a identify groupings of asteroids characterized by nearly iden- Poisson distribution. Lindblad and Southworth (1971) cali- tical orbits (Hirayama, 1918, 1928, 1933). In interpreting brated their method in such a way as to find good agree- these results, Hirayama made the hypothesis that such a ment with Brouwer’s results. Carusi and Massaro (1978) proximity could not be due to chance and proposed a com- adjusted their method in order to again find the classical mon origin for the members of these groupings.
    [Show full text]
  • ~XECKDING PAGE BLANK WT FIL,,Q
    1,. ,-- ,-- ~XECKDING PAGE BLANK WT FIL,,q DYNAMICAL EVIDENCE REGARDING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ASTEROIDS AND METEORITES GEORGE W. WETHERILL Department of Temcltricrl kgnetism ~amregie~mtittition of Washington Washington, D. C. 20025 Meteorites are fragments of small solar system bodies (comets, asteroids and Apollo objects). Therefore they may be expected to provide valuable information regarding these bodies. How- ever, the identification of particular classes of meteorites with particular small bodies or classes of small bodies is at present uncertain. It is very unlikely that any significant quantity of meteoritic material is obtained from typical ac- tive comets. Relatively we1 1-studied dynamical mechanisms exist for transferring material into the vicinity of the Earth from the inner edge of the asteroid belt on an 210~-~year time scale. It seems likely that most iron meteorites are obtained in this way, and a significant yield of complementary differec- tiated meteoritic silicate material may be expected to accom- pany these differentiated iron meteorites. Insofar as data exist, photometric measurements support an association between Apollo objects and chondri tic meteorites. Because Apol lo ob- jects are in orbits which come close to the Earth, and also must be fragmented as they traverse the asteroid belt near aphel ion, there also must be a component of the meteorite flux derived from Apollo objects. Dynamical arguments favor the hypothesis that most Apollo objects are devolatilized comet resiaues. However, plausible dynamical , petrographic, and cosmogonical reasons are known which argue against the simple conclusion of this syllogism, uiz., that chondri tes are of cometary origin. Suggestions are given for future theoretical , observational, experimental investigations directed toward improving our understanding of this puzzling situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Chaotic Diffusion of the Vesta Family Induced by Close Encounters with Massive Asteroids
    A&A 540, A118 (2012) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118339 & c ESO 2012 Astrophysics Chaotic diffusion of the Vesta family induced by close encounters with massive asteroids J.-B. Delisle and J. Laskar ASD, IMCCE-CNRS UMR8028, Observatoire de Paris, UPMC, 77 Av. Denfert-Rochereau, 75014 Paris, France e-mail: [email protected] Received 26 October 2011 / Accepted 1 March 2012 ABSTRACT We numerically estimate the semi-major axis chaotic diffusion of the Vesta family asteroids induced by close encounters with 11 mas- sive main-belt asteroids: (1) Ceres, (2) Pallas, (3) Juno, (4) Vesta, (7) Iris, (10) Hygiea, (15) Eunomia, (19) Fortuna, (324) Bamberga, (532) Herculina, (704) Interamnia. We find that most of the diffusion is caused by Ceres and Vesta. By extrapolating our results, we are able to constrain the global effect of close encounters with all main-belt asteroids. A comparison of this drift estimate with the one expected for the Yarkovsky effect shows that for asteroids whose diameter is larger than about 40 km, close encounters dominate the Yarkovsky effect. Overall, our findings confirm the standard scenario for the history of the Vesta family. Key words. celestial mechanics – minor planets, asteroids: general – chaos – methods: numerical 1. Introduction (in terms of the number of asteroids taken into account) con- cerned the Gefion and Adeona families and was conducted by It is now common consent that most of the V-type near-Earth as- Carruba et al. (2003). The authors considered all 682 asteroids teroids (NEAs) and howardite, eucrite, and diogenite (HED) me- of radius larger than 50 km for encounters with members of teorites are fragments of a collision between Vesta and another the families.
    [Show full text]
  • Closing in on HED Meteorite Sources
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Springer - Publisher Connector Earth Planets Space, 53, 1077–1083, 2001 Closing in on HED meteorite sources Mark V. Sykes1 and Faith Vilas2 1Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, U.S.A. 2NASA Johnson Space Center, SN3, Houston, Texas 77058, U.S.A. (Received March 25, 2001; Revised June 1, 2001; Accepted June 28, 2001) Members of the Vesta dynamical family have orbital elements consistent with ejecta from a single large exca- vating collision from a single hemisphere of Vesta. The portion of Vesta’s orbit at which such an event must have occurred is slightly constrained and depends on the hemisphere impacted. There is some evidence for subsequent disruptions of these ejected objects. Spectroscopy suggests that the dynamical family members are associated with material from Vesta’s interior that was excavated by the event giving rise to the crater covering much of Vesta’s southern hemisphere. The 505-nm pyroxene feature seen in HED meteorites is relatively absent in a sample of Vesta dynamical family members raising the question of whether this collisional event was the source of the HED meteorites. Asteroids spectroscopically associated with Vesta that possess this feature are dynamically distinct and could have arisen from a different collisional event on Vesta or originated from a body geochemically similar to Vesta that was disrupted early in the history of the solar system. 1. Introduction discovery of asteroid families by Hirayama (1918), such dy- The howardite-eucrite-diogenite (HED) meteorites com- namical clusters of objects have been thought to arise from prise ∼6% of present meteorite falls (McSween, 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Asteroid Rotation - Hunting for Arecord: 1689 Floris-Jan
    per cent reported by the ESO staff at 8500 Ausing the 3.6 Table 1 (after Natta et al. 1980) shows our present m telescope. Fig. 1 shows the near-infrared spectra of two knowledge of the total sulfur abundances in nebulae. gaseous nebulae: IC 418, a galactic PN, and N 81, a H 11 These figures indicate that the average sulfur abundance region in the Small Magellanic Cloud. Exposure times are for galactic PN is lower than the one in the Sun and the 10 and 30 min. respectively. Orion Nebula. Consequently, one of the first concerns has The Y-axis represents analog to digital converter units been to compare the Reticon sulfur abundance with the (ADG). The system is set such that 1 ADC corresponds to on es reported by Natta et al. (1980). So far, and for the rms noise, which is about 1,000 counts. Saturation of galactic PN only, my values for log (S/H)+ 12 range from an individual diode occurs at about 4 x 106 counts or 6.35 ± 0.20 to 6.75 ± 0.33, depending on the object and about 4,000 ADC units. Therefore, a signal of 600 ADC ICF method used. In any case, my results seem to confirm (Ha line of N 81) corresponds to about 15 per cent of the a total sulfur abundance in PN lower than the one in the saturation level of the detector. Sun and in the Orion Nebula. A large number of questions The [S 111) f..'A 9060, 9532 Alines were detected in N 8, remain to be answered.
    [Show full text]
  • Vesta and the HED Meteorites: Mid-Infrared Modeling of Minerals and Their Abundances
    Vesta and the HED meteorites: Mid-infrared modeling of minerals and their abundances Item Type Article; text Authors Donaldson Hanna, K.; Sprague, A. L. Citation Donaldson Hanna, K., & Sprague, A. L. (2009). Vesta and the HED meteorites: Midinfrared modeling of minerals and their abundances. Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 44(11), 1755-1770. DOI 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2009.tb01205.x Publisher The Meteoritical Society Journal Meteoritics & Planetary Science Rights Copyright © The Meteoritical Society Download date 24/09/2021 12:48:06 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Version Final published version Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/656640 Meteoritics & Planetary Science 44, Nr 11, 1755–1770 (2009) Abstract available online at http://meteoritics.org Vesta and the HED meteorites: Mid-infrared modeling of minerals and their abundances Kerri DONALDSON HANNA1, 2* and Ann L. SPRAGUE1 1Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, 1629 E. University Blvd., Tucson, Arizona 85721–0092, USA 2Present address: Department of Geological Sciences, Brown University, Box 1846, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (Received 29 October 2007; revision accepted 12 August 2009) Abstract–We demonstrate that the use of an established spectral deconvolution algorithm with mid- infrared spectral libraries of mineral separates of varying grain sizes is capable of identifying the known mineral compositions and abundances of a selection of howardite, eucrite, and diogenite (HED) meteorite samples. In addition, we apply the same technique to mid-infrared spectral emissivity measurements of Vesta that have been obtained from Cornell’s Mid-Infrared Asteroid Spectroscopy (MIDAS) Survey and the Infrared Space Observatory (ISO).
    [Show full text]