Criminalisation and Victimization of Migrants in Europe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Criminalisation and Victimization of Migrants in Europe directed by Salvatore Palidda Criminalisation and Victimization of Migrants in Europe Contributions by Marcelo F. AEBI, Hans Jorge ALBRECHT, Edo BAZZACO, Mary BOSWORTH, José Ángel BRANDARIZ GARCÍA, Alessandro DE GIORGI, Nathalie DELGRANDE, Cristina FERNÁNDEZ BESSA, Mhairi GUILD, Bernard HARCOURT, János LADANYI, Yasha MACCANICO, Marcello MANERI, Laurent MUCCHIELLI, Sophie NEVANEN, Salvatore PALIDDA, Gabriella PETTI, Federico RAHOLA, Nando SIGONA, Jérôme VALLUY, Fulvio VASSALLO PALEOLOGO directed by Salvatore Palidda Criminalisation and Victimization of Migrants in Europe With the Contributions of Hans Jorge Albrecht, Edo Bazzaco, José Ángel Brandariz García, Alessandro De Giorgi, Cristina Fernández Bessa, Bernard Harcourt, János Ladanyi, Yasha Maccanico, Marcello Maneri, Laurent Mucchielli, Sophie Nevanen, Palidda, Gabriella Petti, Federico Rahola, Nando Sigona, Jerome Valluy, Fulvio Vassallo Paleologo Work Package 3 Criminalisation and Decriminalisation Processes Criminalisation and Victimisation of Migrants in Europe directed by Salvatore PALIDDA Contributions by Marcelo F. AEBI, Hans Jorge ALBRECHT, Edo BAZZACO, Mary BOSWORTH, José Ángel BRANDARIZ GARCÍA, Alessandro DE GIORGI, Nathalie DELGRANDE, Cristina FERNÁNDEZ BESSA, Mhairi GUILD, Bernard HARCOURT, János LADANYI, Yasha MACCANICO, Marcello MANERI, Laurent MUCCHIELLI, Sophie NEVANEN, Salvatore PALIDDA, Gabriella PETTI, Federico RAHOLA, Nando SIGONA, Jerome VALLUY, Fulvio VASSALLO PALEOLOGO Assessing Deviance, Crime and Prevention in Europe Sixth Framework Programme FP6-2004-Citizens-5 / Priority 7 / Citizens-2004-6.2.3 Contract n°: 028300 - Start date of contract: July 1st, 2006 Coordination: CNRS (France) Dipartimento di Scienze Antropologiche Università degli Studi di Genova c.so A. Podestà, 2; 16128 Genova (It) Criminalisation and Victimization of Migrants in Europe 2 Notice This book collects some contributions proposed to the workshop “Criminalization and victimization of immigrants in Europe”, organized the 13th and 15th March 2008 at the Dipartimento di Scienze Antropologiche of Genoa University, in the framework of Workpackage 3, “Processes of criminalization and (de)criminalization”, of the Crimprev Programme. The contributions of Delgrande and Aebi, De Giorgi, Valluy, Mucchielli and Nevanen, Bosworth et Guild, Maccanico, Brandariz García et Fernández Bessa, Bazzaco, Vassallo Paleologo, Harcourt, Sigona, Maneri, Palidda, Petti and Vitale are published in an Italian book. The contributions of Delgrande and Aebi, Bosworth and Guild are published in French or in English respectively in 4/2009 of “Déviance et Société” and in “British Journal of Criminology” 48:703-719 (2008): http://bjc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/48/6/703. Liste des participants au workshop de Genes List of participants to the Genoa workshop - Marcelo F. AEBI (Institut de Criminologie et de Droit Pénal, Suisse) - Hans Jorge ALBRECHT (director of Max Planck Institute of Freiburg-D) - Mary BOSWORTH and Mhairi GUILD (University of Oxford) - José Ángel BRANDARIZ GARCÍA (Un. de La Coruña - Fabienne BRION (UCL-A. Catholique de Louvain) - Daniele COLOGNA (Un. Milan) - Alessandro DAL LAGO (Un. Genoa) - Nathalie DELGRANDE (Institut de Criminologie et de Droit Pénal, Suisse) - Cristina FERNÁNDEZ BESSA (Observatori del Sistema Penal i els Drets Human, Spain) - Emilio FRANZINA (Un. of Verona) - Bernard HARCOURT (Un. of Chicago) - János LADANYI (University of Economics Budapest) - Yasha MACCANICO (Statewatch) - Marcello MANERI (Un. of Milano) - Laurent MUCCHIELLI (CESDIP-CNRS France) - Sophie NEVANEN (CESDIP-CNRS France) - Salvatore PALIDDA (Un. of Genoa) - Gabriella PETTI (Un. of Genoa) - Federico RAHOLA (Un. of Genoa) - Jerome VALLUY: (Un. Paris 1) - Fulvio VASSALLO PALEOLOGO (Un. of Palermo) - Tommaso VITALE (Un. of Milano) Criminalisation and Victimization of Migrants in Europe 3 CONTENTS Considerations on the main european countries (English and French version) Introduction (Palidda) General aspects - Media and the war on immigration, by Marcello MANERI - The Detention Machine, by Federico RAHOLA - The U.S. Penal Experiment, by Alessandro De GIORGI - The methamorphosis of asylum in Europe, by Jerome VALLUY - The Roma in neoliberal Europe by Nando SIGONA Nationals cases studies - Delinquency, victimisation, criminalisation of foreigners in France by Laurent MUCCHIELLI et Sophie NEVANEN - Immigration, crime and victimization in Europe and particularly in Germany by Hans Jorge ALBRECHT - The Construction of Migrants as a Risk Category in Spain by José Ángel BRANDARIZ GARCÍA and Cristina FERNÁNDEZ BESSA - La inmigración en España en los discursos de media y política by Edoardo BAZZACO - The Italian crime deal, by Salvatore PALIDDA Particular practices - Borders of Punishment. A Critique of Immigrant Profiling by Bernard HARCOURT - An Attempt at Explaining the Frequency and Intensity of anti-Roma Atrocities, by János LADANYI - The criminalisation of young people by Yasha MACCANICO - Aspects of the war against migration in the Mediterranean by Fulvio VASSALLO PALEOLOGO - Practices of exclusion in international terrorism trials, by Gabriella PETTI Criminalisation and Victimization of Migrants in Europe 4 Introduction (S. Palidda) The history of different societies has always been marked by periods of persecution and violence, sometimes extreme, targeting the “outsider”, that is, the “enemy of the time”1. But how can the intensification of the persecution of Roma people and gipsies in general, and of the criminalisation of immigrants in present-day Europe be explained? As the contributions collected in this volume show, it is a matter of the most elementary mechanism that emerges as being useful if not indispensable for the solidity or re-alignment of political cohesion. The latter is nourished, precisely, by the fear and insecurities attributed to such an enemy to justify practices of power that blend all sorts of prohibitionism, protectionism and an authoritarianism that also strikes at the weakest part of the autochthonous population itself. The war against outsiders, those who are different, may thus be considered one of the “total political facts” that pervades all of society through discourses, rhetoric and practices that consolidate a real or supposed majority. Hence, we can understand that in the current racist approach that characterises the management of societies, there are overlapping aspects that are reminiscent of the discourses and practices applied to colonised peoples and the subordinate classes in the 19th and 20th centuries. In other terms, the persecution of gipsies and the criminalisation of migrants is currently written into a liberalist/neo-conservative political layout that is based on the asymmetry of power and wealth between powerful actors and the weak who have no rights or are reduced to the state of non-people. The story of the current war against migrations is intertwined with that of the development of criminalisation that began with the neo-conservative revolution in the United States and in England (Thatcher reached power in 1979, Reagan did so in 1981). The success of this revolution continued without interruption even under “democratic” or “left-wing” administrations (Clinton, Blair, Jospin, the centre-left in Italy and even Zapatero in Spain), also because the neo-conservative discourse (in the foucauldian acceptation of the term) has ended up phagocytising a sizeable part of the intellectuals and leaders of the left itself. But it is only today that the causes of this process appear somewhat clearer if it is analysed as a passage from the government that was meant to pursue the liberal-democratic myth (described by Foucault2) to a liberalist management that only pursues the hic et nunc prosperity of the stronger parties. The exacerbation of criminalisation, of “zero tolerance”, experiments towards the elimination of the “human 1 On the aspects, see previous works in which I refer, in particular, to Michel Foucault’s work (see especially Palidda, 2009, 2008 and 2000) 2 In particular, see: the following volumes of his courses at the Collège, namely, Il faut défendre la société, 1997; Sécurité, territoire, population, 2004; Naissance de la biopolitique, 2004; Le gouvernement de soi et des autres, Hautes Etudes-Gallimard-Seuil, 2008 Criminalisation and Victimization of Migrants in Europe 5 surplus”, in short, of what Simon (2008) and others term the crime deal, in fact, reflect a management of society that excludes social recovery, re- integration or rehabilitation, because it only seeks to “maximise” the profits of the subjects who are in power. Why take care of marginal people, drug addicts, the poor, deviants, and why promote the stable, peaceful and regular integration of immigrants when, today, the growth of profits can be played out through the erosion of workers’ rights, their inferiorisation until they almost reduced to a role as neo-slaves, and getting rid of them at the first sign of them making claims or when they are too worn and can easily be replaced by other rightless or non-people? The government of the people that was meant to have taken care of the inhabitants to construct a stable, peaceful and well-regulated society in accordance with the norms of a universalistic legal order, up to the point of seeking to make everyone happy3 has never existed. But, since the start of the 1970s (at the end of the “glorious thirty years”), the political organisation of the wealthy societies of the second post-war period had given the impression that it may have
Recommended publications
  • Mason Williams
    City of Ambition: Franklin Roosevelt, Fiorello La Guardia, and the Making of New Deal New York Mason Williams Submitted in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2012 © 2012 Mason Williams All Rights Reserved Abstract City of Ambition: Franklin Roosevelt, Fiorello La Guardia, and the Making of New Deal New York Mason Williams This dissertation offers a new account of New York City’s politics and government in the 1930s and 1940s. Focusing on the development of the functions and capacities of the municipal state, it examines three sets of interrelated political changes: the triumph of “municipal reform” over the institutions and practices of the Tammany Hall political machine and its outer-borough counterparts; the incorporation of hundreds of thousands of new voters into the electorate and into urban political life more broadly; and the development of an ambitious and capacious public sector—what Joshua Freeman has recently described as a “social democratic polity.” It places these developments within the context of the national New Deal, showing how national officials, responding to the limitations of the American central state, utilized the planning and operational capacities of local governments to meet their own imperatives; and how national initiatives fed back into subnational politics, redrawing the bounds of what was possible in local government as well as altering the strength and orientation of local political organizations. The dissertation thus seeks not only to provide a more robust account of this crucial passage in the political history of America’s largest city, but also to shed new light on the history of the national New Deal—in particular, its relation to the urban social reform movements of the Progressive Era, the long-term effects of short-lived programs such as work relief and price control, and the roles of federalism and localism in New Deal statecraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Theda Skocpol
    NAMING THE PROBLEM What It Will Take to Counter Extremism and Engage Americans in the Fight against Global Warming Theda Skocpol Harvard University January 2013 Prepared for the Symposium on THE POLITICS OF AMERICA’S FIGHT AGAINST GLOBAL WARMING Co-sponsored by the Columbia School of Journalism and the Scholars Strategy Network February 14, 2013, 4-6 pm Tsai Auditorium, Harvard University CONTENTS Making Sense of the Cap and Trade Failure Beyond Easy Answers Did the Economic Downturn Do It? Did Obama Fail to Lead? An Anatomy of Two Reform Campaigns A Regulated Market Approach to Health Reform Harnessing Market Forces to Mitigate Global Warming New Investments in Coalition-Building and Political Capabilities HCAN on the Left Edge of the Possible Climate Reformers Invest in Insider Bargains and Media Ads Outflanked by Extremists The Roots of GOP Opposition Climate Change Denial The Pivotal Battle for Public Opinion in 2006 and 2007 The Tea Party Seals the Deal ii What Can Be Learned? Environmentalists Diagnose the Causes of Death Where Should Philanthropic Money Go? The Politics Next Time Yearning for an Easy Way New Kinds of Insider Deals? Are Market Forces Enough? What Kind of Politics? Using Policy Goals to Build a Broader Coalition The Challenge Named iii “I can’t work on a problem if I cannot name it.” The complaint was registered gently, almost as a musing after-thought at the end of a June 2012 interview I conducted by telephone with one of the nation’s prominent environmental leaders. My interlocutor had played a major role in efforts to get Congress to pass “cap and trade” legislation during 2009 and 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • REPOWERING AMERICA: Transmission Investment for Economic Stimulus and Climate Change
    REPOWERING AMERICA: Transmission investment for economic stimulus and climate change May 2021 Prepared for: London Economics International LLC 717 Atlantic Avenue, Suite 1A Boston, MA 02111 www.londoneconomics.com Disclaimer The analysis London Economics International LLC (“LEI”) provides in this study is intended to illustrate the potential economic benefit of transmission investment in terms of GDP and employment for the American economy (to support economic recovery), and as a potential public policy tool (to support longer term environmental goals to reduce carbon emissions, which will itself create positive economic benefits). While LEI has taken all reasonable care to ensure that its analysis is complete, the interplay of electric infrastructure investment and dynamics of local economies are highly complex, and thus this illustrative analysis does not quantify all tradeoffs and substitution effects, nor attempt to quantify various positive effects from reduced carbon emissions and containment of damages from Climate Change. Furthermore, certain recent developments in the US economy and transmission investment plans of various regions of the US may or may not be included in LEI’s illustrative analysis. This report is not intended to be an evaluation of any specific transmission investment or a definitive assessment of future economic conditions in the US. The opinions expressed in this report as well as any errors or omissions, are solely those of the authors and do not represent the opinions of other clients of London Economics International LLC. ii London Economics International LLC 717 Atlantic Avenue, Suite 1A Boston, MA 02111 www.londoneconomics.com Table of contents ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................................................................... VI 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • It's Raining Money It's Raining Money
    2009_1_26.qxp 1/6/2009 5:54 PM Page 1 January 26, 2009 49145 $3.95 Goldberg: The New Deal’s Undeserved Reputation IT’S RAINING MONEY $3.95 04 Mark Steyn on the Obama Era 0 09128 49145 5 www.nationalreview.com base.qxp 1/5/2009 2:11 PM Page 1 15 ) 1 *% N &)3 GI toc.qxp 1/7/2009 1:51 PM Page 1 Contents JANUARY 26, 2009 | VOLUME LXI, NO. 1 | www.nationalreview.com GOLDBERG: The Shrine of FDR . p. 18 COVER STORY Page 26 Twelve Zeroes BOOKS, ARTS & MANNERS In Washington, some strange new Zimbabwean 40 WHERE THE BUCK STOPS by John R. Bolton unit seems to have been Presidential Command: introduced between the Power, Leadership, and the Making of Foreign Policy election and the inauguration: from Richard Nixon to No matter how many zeroes George W. Bush, by Peter W. Rodman you stick on the end, the next guy will always add a 45 FDR RECONSIDERED by Jonathan H. Adler couple more. Mark Steyn New Deal or Raw Deal? How FDR’s Economic Legacy Has Damaged THOMAS REIS America, by Burton Folsom Jr. ARTICLES 47 GOING GREAT GUNS 18 THE SHRINE OF FDR by Jonah Goldberg by Robert VerBruggen Why the Left worships there. Gun Control on Trial: Inside the Supreme Court 20 COURTS VS. LAW by Ramesh Ponnuru Battle over the Second Why you shouldn’t want an activist judiciary. Amendment, by Brian Doherty 22 AND GLOBAL WARMING TOO! by Jim Manzi Sorry, a gas tax won’t solve all our problems.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tale of Two Economies
    A Tale of Two Economies Government Information from the New Deal and Now Catherine Jervey Marianne Ryan My fellow Americans… Serial Set 13034-10 H.doc.208, Inaugural Addresses of Presidents of the U.S., 1789-1973, 1974 1 We will rebuild, we will recover… “I’ve come here tonight not only to address the distinguished men and women in this great chamber, but to speak frankly and directly to the men and women who sent us here ... I know that for many Americans watching right now, the state of our economy is a concern that rises above all others. And rightly so. If you haven’t been personally affected by this recession, you probably know someone who has – a friend; a neighbor; a member of your family. You don’t need to hear another list of statistics to know that our economy is in now hanging by a thread; the college acceptance letter your child had to put back in the envelope. The impact of this recession is real, and it is everywhere. But while our economy may be weakened and our confidence shaken; though we are living through difficult and uncertain times, tonight I want every American to know this: We will rebuild, we will recover, and the United States of America will emerge stronger than before. ” House Document 111-1, Presidential Address Before a Joint Session of Congress, Message from the President, Feb. 25, 2009; Image: Committee Print S. Prt. 111-17, Congressional Pictorial Directory, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, June 2009 What Was the New Deal? A series of novel economic and social experiments designed to promote economic recovery
    [Show full text]
  • The Green Impact Zone of Missouri: an Analysis
    THE GREEN IMPACT ZONE OF MISSOURI: AN ANALYSIS OF PLACE-BASED INVESTMENT A THESIS IN Environmental and Urban Geosciences Presented to the Faculty of the University of Missouri-Kansas City in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE by KEVIN WICKMAN B.S., Knox College, 2009 Kansas City, Missouri 2016 THE GREEN IMPACT ZONE OF MISSOURI: AN ANALYSIS OF PLACE-BASED INVESTMENT Kevin Michael Wickman, Candidate for the Master of Science Degree University of Missouri-Kansas City, 2016 ABSTRACT The Green Impact Zone of Missouri operated in Kansas City, Missouri from 2009 until 2014 as a national model for place-based investment. Missouri Congressman Emanuel Cleaver II is credited with pioneering the initiative, which was overseen for five years by the Kansas City metropolitan-area regional planning organization, the Mid-America Regional Council. During those five years, the Green Impact Zone directed about $166 million dollars into a 150-square block area from 39th Street to 51st Street, including Troost and Prospect avenues as well as Emanuel Cleaver II Boulevard. The money came largely from federal funding made available in response to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 and went towards neighborhood infrastructure and investments in human capital, with an emphasis on environmental sustainability. The Green Impact Zone was designed to be highly visible, and it benefited to this end from public support from then-President Barack Obama and other White House personnel. When the initiative ultimately shut down in 2014 due to a lack of funding, it did so quietly, receiving much less fanfare in its final days than it did in its early days.
    [Show full text]
  • Images of Inherited War Ree American Presidents in Vietnam
    THE 13 DREW PER PA S Images of Inherited War ree American Presidents in Vietnam William R. Hersch Lieutenant Colonel, USAF Air University David S. Fadok, Lieutenant General, Commander and President School of Advanced Air and Space Studies Jeffrey J. Smith, Colonel, PhD, Commandant and Dean AIR UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ADVANCED AIR AND SPACE STUDIES Images of Inherited War Three American Presidents in Vietnam William R. Hersch Lieutenant Colonel, USAF Drew Paper No. 13 Air University Press Air Force Research Institute Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama Project Editor Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Jeanne K. Shamburger Hersch, William R., 1972– Cover Art, Book Design, and Illustrations Images of inherited war : three American presidents in Vietnam Daniel Armstrong / William R. Hersch, Lt. Colonel, USAF. Composition and Prepress Production pages cm. — (Drew paper, ISSN 1941-3785 ; no. 13) Nedra Looney Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-1-58566-249-4 Print Preparation and Distribution 1. Vietnam War, 1961–1975—Public opinion. 2. Vietnam War, Diane Clark 1961–1975—United States. 3. Kennedy, John F. (John Fitzgerald), 1917–1963—Public opinion. 4. Johnson, Lyndon B. (Lyndon Baines), 1908–1973—Public opinion. 5. Nixon, Richard M. (Richard Milhous), 1913–1994—Public opinion. 6. Political AIR FORCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE culture—United States—History—20th century. 7. Public opinion—United States—History—20th century. I. Title. AIR UNIVERSITY PRESS DS559.62.U6H46 2014 959.704’31–dc23 2014034552 Director and Publisher Allen G. Peck Editor in Chief Oreste M. Johnson Published by Air University Press in February 2014 Managing Editor Demorah Hayes Design and Production Manager Cheryl King Air University Press 155 N.
    [Show full text]
  • User-Friendly Licensing for a User-Generated World: the Future of the Video-Content Market
    Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law Volume 15 Issue 2 Issue 2 - Winter 2013 Article 5 2013 User-Friendly Licensing for a User-Generated World: The Future of the Video-Content Market Joanna E. Collins Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/jetlaw Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Joanna E. Collins, User-Friendly Licensing for a User-Generated World: The Future of the Video-Content Market, 15 Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law 407 (2020) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/jetlaw/vol15/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. User-Friendly Licensing for a User-Generated World: The Future of the Video-Content Market ABSTRACT A picture may say a thousand words, but in today's artistic culture, video is the true king. User-generated remix and mashup videos have become a central way for people to communicate their ideas, to be a part of popular culture, and to bring life to their own artistic visions. Digital technology and the rise of user-generated Internet platforms have enabled professionals and amateurs alike to participate in the creation of web videos, which often incorporate popular content. But this has led to a growing tension between amateur sampling artists and copyright rightsholders. The current video-content- licensing scheme requires individually negotiated contracts for authorized use of copyrighted material, but amateur artists frequently lack the bargaining power and understanding of copyright law to comply with licensing requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Ordinated By
    Co-ordinated by: Last updated: February 2019 Julia Zelvenska Head of Legal Support and Litigation European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE) Rue Royale 146, 1st floor 1000 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 (2) 212 0814 Fax: +32 (2) 514 5922 E-mail: [email protected] CONTENTS A. Introduction Preface i European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE) ii Introduction to ELENA iii B. Countries Austria 1 Belgium 8 Bosnia-Herzegovina 13 Bulgaria 15 Croatia 19 Cyprus 23 Czech Republic 26 Denmark 28 Estonia 32 Finland 34 France 37 Germany 47 Greece 57 Hungary 62 Iceland 65 Ireland 68 Italy 73 Latvia 87 Lithuania 89 Luxembourg 91 Malta 94 The Netherlands 97 Norway 102 Poland 108 Portugal 111 Romania 114 Russia 117 Serbia 121 Slovak Republic 125 Slovenia 128 Spain 133 Sweden 145 Switzerland 153 Turkey 156 Ukraine 159 United Kingdom 161 C. UNHCR Offices 165 D. Format of the country chapters In general the country chapters are structured as follows: I. ELENA NATIONAL COORDINATOR Name and address of the person who serves as the contact and coordination person for the ELENA network for the country in question. II. NATIONAL UMBRELLA ORGANISATIONS / REFUGEE COUNCILS National umbrella organisations of voluntary agencies, counselling offices and lawyers who exercise a coordinating function. III. ORGANISATIONS SUPPORTING ASYLUM SEEKERS Voluntary agencies, counselling centres and other humanitarian organisations dealing with counselling, housing, financial support, integration and other social problems of asylum seekers during the asylum procedure. IV. ORGANISATIONS PROVIDING ADVICE TO ASYLUM SEEKERS Non-Governmental Organisations and voluntary agencies providing legal advice and assistance to asylum seekers.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Deformation: the Corruption of Capitalism in America
    4/C PROCESS + PANTONE 8402 GRITTY MATTE UV 100#PAPER. ECONOMICS / BUSINESS $35.00 / $38.00 can IN THE WORDS OF DAVID STOCKMAN THE GREAT DEFORMATION is a searing look at Washington’s craven response to the recent myriad of financial crises and fiscal cliffs. It counters conven- ER D “ At the heart of the Great Deformation is a rogue central bank tional wisdom with an eighty-year revisionist history of how LAN G N E that has abandoned every vestige of sound money.” the American state—especially the Federal Reserve—has fallen ARYL ARYL C prey to the politics of crony capitalism and the ideologies of fiscal stimulus, monetary central planning, and financial bail- DAVID A. STOCKMAN was elected as a “ In the years after 1980, America had undergone the equivalent of outs. These forces have left the public sector teetering on the Michigan congressman in 1976 and joined the Reagan White a national leveraged buyout...[and was] now saddled with edge of political dysfunction and fiscal collapse and have caused House in 1981. Serving as budget director, he was one of the America’s private enterprise foundation to morph into a spec- more in combined public and private debt.” key architects of the Reagan Revolution plan to reduce taxes, $30 trillion ulative casino that swindles the masses and enriches the few. cut spending, and shrink the role of government. He joined Defying right- and left-wing boxes, David Stockman Salomon Brothers in 1985 and later became one of the early The Corruption of Capitalism provides a catalogue of corrupters and defenders of sound partners of the Blackstone Group.
    [Show full text]
  • A Supercut of Supercuts: Aesthetics, Histories, Databases
    A Supercut of Supercuts: Aesthetics, Histories, Databases PRACTICE RESEARCH MAX TOHLINE ABSTRACT CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Max Tohline The genealogies of the supercut, which extend well past YouTube compilations, back Independent scholar, US to the 1920s and beyond, reveal it not as an aesthetic that trickled from avant-garde [email protected] experimentation into mass entertainment, but rather the material expression of a newly-ascendant mode of knowledge and power: the database episteme. KEYWORDS: editing; supercut; compilation; montage; archive; database TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Tohline, M. 2021. A Supercut of Supercuts: Aesthetics, Histories, Databases. Open Screens, 4(1): 8, pp. 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16995/os.45 Tohline Open Screens DOI: 10.16995/os.45 2 Full Transcript: https://www.academia.edu/45172369/Tohline_A_Supercut_of_Supercuts_full_transcript. Tohline Open Screens DOI: 10.16995/os.45 3 RESEARCH STATEMENT strong patterning in supercuts focuses viewer attention toward that which repeats, stoking uncritical desire for This first inklings of this video essay came in the form that repetition, regardless of the content of the images. of a one-off blog post I wrote seven years ago (Tohline While critical analysis is certainly possible within the 2013) in response to Miklos Kiss’s work on the “narrative” form, the supercut, broadly speaking, naturally gravitates supercut (Kiss 2013). My thoughts then comprised little toward desire instead of analysis. more than a list; an attempt to add a few works to Armed with this conclusion, part two sets out to the prehistory of the supercut that I felt Kiss and other discover the various roots of the supercut with this supercut researchers or popularizers, like Tom McCormack desire-centered-ness, and other pragmatics, as a guide.
    [Show full text]
  • The Last White Election?
    mike davis THE LAST WHITE ELECTION? ast september, while Bill Clinton was delighting the 2012 Democratic Convention in Charlotte with his folksy jibe at Mitt Romney for wanting to ‘double up on the trickle down’, a fanatical adherent of Ludwig von Mises, wearing a villainous Lblack cowboy hat and accompanied by a gun-toting bodyguard, captured the national headquarters of the Tea Party movement in Washington, dc. The Jack Palance double in the Stetson was Dick Armey. As House Majority Leader in 1997 he had participated in a botched plot, instigated by Republican Whip Tom DeLay and an obscure Ohio Congressman named John Boehner, to topple House Speaker Newt Gingrich. Now Armey was attempting to wrest total control of FreedomWorks, the organization most responsible for repackaging rank-and-file Republican rage as the ‘Tea Party rebellion’ as well as training and coordinating its activists.1 Tea Party Patriots—a national network with several hundred affiliates—is one of its direct offshoots. As FreedomWorks’ chairperson, Armey symbolized an ideological continuity between the Republican con- gressional landslides of 1994 and 2010, the old ‘Contract with America’ and the new ‘Contract from America’. No one was better credentialed to inflict mortal damage on the myth of conservative solidarity. Only in December did the lurid details of the coup leak to the press. According to the Washington Post, ‘the gun-wielding assistant escorted FreedomWorks’ top two employees off the premises, while Armey sus- pended several others who broke down in sobs at the news.’2 The chief target was Matt Kibbe, the organization’s president and co-author with Armey of the best-selling Give Us Liberty: A Tea Party Manifesto.
    [Show full text]