DOCSLIB.ORG

© 2014 Jesse Sherry ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
© 2014 Jesse Sherry ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2014 Jesse Sherry ALL RIGHTS RESERVED COMMUNITY SUPPORTED SUSTAINABILITY: HOW ECOVILLAGES MODEL MORE SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY By JESSE SHERRY A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Planning and Public Policy Written under the direction of Dr. Clinton Andrews and approved by ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey May, 2014 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Community Supported Sustainability: How Ecovillages Model More Sustainable Community By JESSE SHERRY Dissertation Director: Dr. Clinton Andrews Ecovillages are small, intentional communities which focus on reducing environmental impact while creating a community that incorporates the natural world. Despite varying approaches, each ecovillage attempts to create a community that integrates the social, economic, and environmental dimensions of sustainability. This study investigates several of these communities to better understand two key questions: 1) to what extent do ecovillage residents have a lower environmental impact than residents of nearby communities and the national average? and 2) how is the reduction in environmental impact achieved? These questions are addressed through the use of life cycle assessment and qualitative case studies of three sites, specifically one suburban and two rural ecovillages. Comparisons with nearby communities and the national average are made, and the results show that the case study ecovillages have a much lower per capita environmental impact. My research suggests that this is achieved through a combination of physical (village building and planning) and behavioral adaptations supported by community ideals and norms. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Over the past eight years, I have received support and encouragement from a great number of individuals. Dr. Clinton Andrews has been a supportive and insightful mentor throughout this process. I would like to thank my dissertation committee of Dr. Uta Krogmann, Dr. Kathe Newman, and Dr. Hal Salzman for their support over the past three years as I moved from an idea to a completed study. In addition, Rolando Rodriguez and Ben Klemens both provided valuable methodological advice. During data collection and writing Sarah Wilson Sherry spent countless hours proofreading and listening to me talk about my research. This project would never have been possible without the generous assistance and cooperation of the members of Ecovillage at Ithaca, Sirius, and Earthaven. They welcomed me into their homes, shared the details of their lives, and encouraged me with their interest. In particular I would like to thank Dan Greenberg for his insight into intentional community, Liz Walker for her willingness to take time for one more researcher, and Susan Wolf for providing a home away from home. iii Table of Contents Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. ii Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. iii Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2. Literature Review ......................................................................................................... 12 1. Sustainable Development ..................................................................................................... 12 2. Sustainable Communities ...................................................................................................... 16 3. Utopian and Intentional Communities .................................................................................. 17 4. Ecovillages ............................................................................................................................. 21 5. Sustainable Consumption...................................................................................................... 24 6. Life Cycle Assessment............................................................................................................ 25 Chapter 3. Case Study Methodology ............................................................................................. 28 Chapter 4. Ecovillage at Ithaca ....................................................................................................... 35 1. Village Description ................................................................................................................. 35 2. Community Organization ...................................................................................................... 41 3. Environmental Protection and Resource Use ....................................................................... 47 4. Ecological Planning and Village Development ...................................................................... 53 5. Social Institutions and Local Culture ..................................................................................... 63 Chapter 5. Earthaven ..................................................................................................................... 74 1. Village Description ................................................................................................................. 74 2. Community Organization ...................................................................................................... 80 3. Environmental Protection and Resource Use ....................................................................... 87 4. Ecological Planning and Village Development ...................................................................... 92 5. Social Institutions and Local Culture ................................................................................... 100 Chapter 6. Sirius Community ....................................................................................................... 108 1. Village Description ............................................................................................................... 108 2. Community Organization .................................................................................................... 112 3. Environmental Protection and Resource Use ..................................................................... 121 4. Ecological Planning and Village Development .................................................................... 125 5. Social Institutions and Local Culture ................................................................................... 132 Chapter 7. Case Study Conclusions .............................................................................................. 138 Chapter 8. Life Cycle Assessment of Ecovillages .......................................................................... 146 1. Introduction......................................................................................................................... 146 2. Materials and Methods ....................................................................................................... 147 3. Results ................................................................................................................................. 160 4. Discussion and Conclusions ................................................................................................. 183 Chapter 9. Conclusion and Discussion ......................................................................................... 186 Bibliography: ................................................................................................................................ 194 iv Appendix A. Survey Results .......................................................................................................... 209 Appendix B. Environmental Footprint Questionnaire ................................................................. 211 Appendix C. Additional LCA Results ............................................................................................. 215 Appendix D. Discussion of Renewable Energy Infrastructure ..................................................... 219 Appendix E. Composting LCI models............................................................................................ 222 Appendix F. Correlation Analysis of Impact Categories .............................................................. 225 Appendix G. Life Cycle Inventories.............................................................................................. 228 G.1 Home Energy Use.............................................................................................................. 228 G.2 Transportation Energy Use ............................................................................................... 234 G.3 Food .................................................................................................................................. 237 G.4 Waste Disposal.................................................................................................................. 242 Appendix H. Sensitivity Analyses ................................................................................................ 246 H.1 Sensitivity Analysis of Diet Models ................................................................................... 246 H.2 Sensitivity Analysis of Wood Use .....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Intentional Neurodiverse and Intergenerational Cohousing Community
    An Intentional Neurodiverse and Intergenerational Cohousing Community Empowered by Autistic Voices Documented by: ASU team Contact: 612-396-7422 or [email protected] Meeting Agenda Project overview and updates (3-4:30PM) • Overview • Questions from audience • Fill out interest survey • Sign up for volunteer committees Working session (4:45-5:45PM) • Introductions – meet others interested in this community • Visioning exercise • Deeper dive into floor plans and financing • Discuss interest in long term commitments to the project and how to pool funds for land acquisition • Sign up for volunteer committees 2 About ASU ASU (Autism SIBS Universe) is a non-profit organization - 501c3 registered with IRS in 2018 founded by Autistics - support from peers, parents and community members Vision is to create sustainable neurodiverse communities where people with all types of abilities live together to support each other ASU Board members Mix of Autistics, parents and community members 3 Important When are a Neurodiverse community and we welcome people of all abilities We are an intentional community designed with Autistics in mind, but we are NOT an Autism or Disability only housing A community where there is something for everyone Naturally supported safe, trusted and sustainable living for ALL – Independent homes with easy access to COMMUNITY, less isolation, connected relationships, more fun, Healthier and more long term supports For families without Autism For Autistics and their - A GREAT opportunity to families – A safety net for live in a sustainable their children’s future. environment while Better support dealing supporting a neurodiverse with Autism and related community and vice versa challenges. More respite.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion, Ethics, and Poetics in a Tamil Literary Tradition
    Tacit Tirukku#a#: Religion, Ethics, and Poetics in a Tamil Literary Tradition The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Smith, Jason William. 2020. Tacit Tirukku#a#: Religion, Ethics, and Poetics in a Tamil Literary Tradition. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard Divinity School. Citable link https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37364524 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use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
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Communities
    Sustainable Communities A Twenty-seven Year Study of Sustainable Communities Part I Where we visited, volunteered or lived ● Sustainable Communities for Adults with Special Needs ● Land Trust Communities ● Eco Villages ● Educational Communities ● Co-Housing Communities Camphill Villages Copake, NY Kimberton Hills, PA Glenmore, PA Camphill is an international movement of intentional communities designed to meet the needs of young adults with developmental disabilities through a combination of community life, the arts, crafts and work on the land. Raising their own foods through biodynamic practices leads to optimum health for all residents. Celo Land Trust and Community Burnsville, NC This artistic community, about an hour away from Asheville, was started by 3 Quaker families in 1938. It is now the home of: Toe River Swim Area Ten Thousand Things The Celo Inn and Garden Food Co-op Camp Celo Arthur Morgan School Toe River Craft Coop Celo Health Center Earthaven Ecovillage Black Mountain, NC Earthaven members consciously develop sustainable lifestyles, utilizing permaculture principles in design as well as in agricultural practices. The residents live off-the-grid, ride bikes or walk in the village and some own and operate green businesses. Earthaven Ecovillage Council Hall & Community Center Interior View Exterior view with edible landscaping Wherever possible, builders used recycled materials, such as reclaimed hardwood flooring. They also built with trees culled from the land, rubber tires, cranberry pallets, mud and straw. Earthaven Ecovillage Earthaven homes range from small cabins to large, multi-family structures. The Hobbit House Multi-family Apartment Building A Cobb House Passive Solar, Harvested Wood Home Omega Institute and Center for Sustainable Living Rhinebeck, NY Although the Omega Institute is not an ecovillage, the Rhinebeck campus is laid-out like a small community with cottages of various sizes, a large dining hall, library, shops, canteen, a beautiful garden, Zen meditation trails, a lake, gazebos, walking paths, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Eco-Collaboration Between Higher Education and Ecovillages A
    Partnerships for Sustainability: Eco-Collaboration between Higher Education and Ecovillages A PROJECT SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Kiernan Jeanette Gladman IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF LIBERAL STUDIES February 2014 ©Kiernan Jeanette Gladman 2014 For John May the soles of our shoes wear down together. i Paradise (John Prine) When I was a child, my family would travel Down to western Kentucky where my parents were born And there's a backwards old town that's often remembered So many times that my memories are worn Chorus: And Daddy, won't you take me back to Muhlenberg County Down by the Green River where Paradise lay Well, I'm sorry, my son, but you're too late in asking Mister Peabody's coal train has hauled it away Well sometimes we'd travel right down the Green River To the abandoned old prison down by Adrie Hill Where the air smelled like snakes and we'd shoot with our pistols But empty pop bottles was all we would kill Chorus And the coal company came with the world's largest shovel And they tortured the timber and stripped all the land Well, they dug for their coal till the land was forsaken Then they wrote it all down as the progress of man Chorus When I die let my ashes float down the Green River Let my soul roll on up to the Rochester dam I'll be halfway to Heaven with Paradise waitin' Just five miles away from wherever I am Chorus ii CONTENTS ILLUSTRATIONS ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ecovillage Community Hostel “Living Space Inspired by Nature Connection for Youth and the Young at Heart to Transform”
    EcoVillage Community Hostel “Living space inspired by nature connection for youth and the young at heart to transform” Findhorn EcoVillage: Findhorn Ecovillage is an experimental architectural community based at The Park, in Moray, Scotland, near the village of Findhorn. The project's main aim is to demonstrate a sustainable development in environmental, social, and economic terms. Findhorn Foundation, founded in 1962 is a “dynamic experiment where everyday life is guided by the inner voice of spirit, where we work in co-creation with the intelligence of nature and take inspired action towards our vision of a better world. Findhorn Foundation shares learning and way of life in experiential workshops, conferences and events that take place within a thriving community and ecovillage” Demand Findhorn Ecovillage enjoys 4,000 attendees at programmes and conferences and around 10,000 visitors each year and generates over £5m for the local economy each year. Orignally the Findhorn Foundation encompassed all areas of community life and ran all courses, programmes and facilities. Today there is a thriving community of around 600 people (NFA estimate) connected to Findhorn EcoVillage with its 35 independent organisations. Findhorn Foundation has over 50,000 followers across the world on Facebook. New accommodation is needed ● To replace capacity being lost with the change of use of various bed and breakfast facilities ● Visiting friends and family as part of the expanding local community ● Overflow for conferences, events and festivals several times
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 9, Issue 2 Tčċ Tėćďđ
    Page 1 The Trail Volume 9, Issue 2 TčĊ TėĆĎđ Eco Fact: The flowers of Skunk Cabbage—one of New Jersey’s first plants to emerge in spring—can actually produce their own heat, allowing them to melt through snow and ice in early spring In This Issue: Finding The Speed of Evolution (2-3) From your editors… Jedi of the Deep (4-5) Dear Readers, Rutgers Will Not Have a 300th Anniversary (6-7) Whether this finds you preparing for one last exam before our The Evolution of Disease (8-9) spring break, or already happily on a plane to warmer climes, Capstone Project (10-11) we invite you to take a moment to look through this latest Privately-Funded Space Race (12-13) edition of The Trail. We have an exceptional spring staff with Are You Getting Your Vitamin Sea? us here at the Human Ecology Department’s monthly (14-15) newsletter—one whose diverse backgrounds bring you Intentional Pioneers (16-17) accounts of mysterious whale clans, the future of artificial LED Light Bulbs: What You Should Know intelligence here at Rutgers, and much more. Enjoy, and (18) here’s wishing everyone a restorative time off! Unprotecting the Protected (19-20) Happy Trails, Algae & The Cow Methane Problem (21) Mercury Levels Dropping in Tuna (22-23) James, Maia, Sarah, and Ian Where’s Your Water From? (24-25) Scott Pruitt’s Environmental Record (26) Enviro. Impacts of a US-Mexico Border Wall (27-28) The Trump Administration’s Temporary A special thank you Freeze on EPA Grants and Contracts Prompts Concern in the American Public to our wonderful (29-30) advisors, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenges of Creating Social Justice in Niches of the Environmental Movement
    Intentional Unity: The Challenges of Creating Social Justice in Niches of the Environmental Movement A Division III e-Booklet By Colin Eldridge Read original online version here Original logo designed by and property of Colin Eldridge This project is dedicated to my late father John Charles Eldridge, and my amazing mother JoAnn Ellsworth, without whom I would not be where I am today. 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents Introduction Section 1: Environment What are Niches in the Environmental Movement? The Problem: Niches in the Environmental Movement are Socially Unjust Histories and Realities of Environmental Movement Niches Work Cited Section 2: Community Excerpts from Interviews Conducted in Intentional Communities A Critique of Diversity Initiatives My Idealist Model for an Anti-Oppressive Intentional Community Section 3: Economy Understanding the Permaculture Ethics The “Sweet Spot” of Fair Share, People Care, and Earth Care Regenerative Economics Section 4: Anti-Oppressive Education The Ladder of Inference Social Permaculture The Systems Thinking Approach The Iceberg Model The Iceberg of Oppression On Paralysis and White Guilt Section 5: Moving Forward More Resources for the Reader What now? Conclusion Glossary 2 Introduction Objectives of this Booklet 1) To point out the inherent flaws within the environmental movement which perpetuate systems of oppression. 2) To reflect on diversity within the niche of intentional communities, and offer excerpts of interviews from an independent field study. 3) To provide a commentary on the “sweet spot” of social, environmental and economic justice. 4) To offer an anti-oppressive educational framework specifically for niches within the environmental movement. About the Author This booklet touches on many subjects of power and privilege.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis and Proposal
    Analysis and Proposal by Leah Gibbons, Hamish, Joe Cole, Thumbs ~Table of Contents~ Executive Summary …………………………………………………………………….. 3 I. Introduction ………………………………………………………………………... 6 Hart’s Mill Background…………………………………………………………. 7 Purpose ………………………………………………………………………….. 10 Consulting Team Vision ………………………………………………………… 11 Consulting Team Mission ………………………………………………………. 11 Consulting Team Objectives…………………………………………………….. 11 II. Hart’s Mill Design Proposals ……………………………………………………… 12 A. Worldview Dimension……………………………………………………….. 13 Story of Change …………………………………………………………………. 18 Worldviews ……………………………………………………………………… 20 Spirituality ………………………………………………………………………. 22 B. Social Dimension ……………………………………………………………. 23 Governance ……………………………………………………………………… 24 Leadership ………………………………………………………………………. 29 Celebrations …………………………………………………………………….. 33 Rituals …………………………………………………………………………… 35 Bioregional Networking ………………………………………………………… 38 C. Ecological Dimension ……………………………………………………….. 43 Nature Conservation …………………………………………………………….. 44 Permaculture and Regenerative Principles ……………………………………… 48 Green Building …………………………………………………………………... 51 Water Systems …………………………………………………………………… 55 Carbon Neutrality ……………………………………………………………….. 58 Climate Change Impacts ………………………………………………………… 62 D. Economic Dimension ……………………………………………………….. 66 Who Are We Now? ……………………………………………………………… 67 Who Are Our Allies?……………………………………………………………… 71 What Do We Do Next?…………………………………………………………… 73 Remaining Questions ……………………………………………………………. 82 Conclustions …………………………………………………………………….. 83 References
    [Show full text]
  • A Netnographic Study on the Slow Fashion Online Community
    Content with less: A netnographic study on the Slow Fashion online community Bárbara Cardoso 152118121 Dissertation written under the supervision of Pedro Oliveira Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of requirements for the MSc in Management with specialization in Strategic Marketing, at the Universidade Católica Portuguesa, January 2020. 1 Title: Content with less: A netnographic study on the Slow Fashion online community Author: Bárbara Cardoso Abstract The slow fashion movement is gaining prominence as consumers have become alerted to the fashion industry’s practices. In a fast-fashion dominated industry, slow fashion proposes a holistic outlook on fashion, considering garment’s movement throughout the supply chain. It advocates an ethically conscious and environmentally aware fashion, ensuring transparent production systems. The present dissertation aims to study the slow fashion online community resorting to netnography. Deviating from previous academic research focused on slow fashion definition, the present research uncovers slow fashion’s meaning to its advocates and common practices. Results demonstrate how slow fashion’s adoption is consensually perceived as a journey and identified its drivers and barriers. The slow movement weights circular fashion and anti-consumerism principles aiming for self-contentment with less. It contributes to current academic discussion on fashion brand’s trust, unveiling skeptical and defrauded consumers that resort to alternative means to evaluate corporations’ credibility. Mistrust in brands is aggravated by the inexistence of an organization nor government body which regulates fashion industry guidelines. Transparency was appointed to lessen the perceived deception greenwashing exerts on brand attitude and perceived company performance. Implications suggest a strategy focused on transparent communication and consumer education, namely on how to increase garments durability.
    [Show full text]
  • "We Try to Create the World That We Want": Intentional Communities
    “We Try to Create the World That We Want” Intentional Communities Forging Livable Lives in St. Louis Joshua Lockyer Department of Behavioral Sciences Arkansas Tech University Peter Benson Department of Anthropology Washington University in St. Louis With: Daniel Burton, LeeAnn Felder, Danielle Hayes, Erica Jackey, and Alysa Lerman Washington University in St. Louis 2011 Funding for this paper was provided by a grant from the Livable Lives Initiative at Washington University in St. Louis. CSD Working Papers No. 11-02 Campus Box 1196 One Brookings Drive St. Louis, MO 63130-9906 (314) 935.7433 csd.wustl.edu I NTENTIONAL C OMMUNITIES F ORGING L IVABLE L IVES IN S T . L OUIS Livable Lives Initiative Washington University in St. Louis The university-wide Livable Lives Initiative investigates what social conditions and policy supports can make life with a low or moderate income stable, secure, satisfying, and successful. The aim is to build a large body of work that informs local programs as well as state and federal policies in economic security, employment, public health, education, housing, and other key areas. Steering Committee Members Marion Crain, School of Law Renee Cunningham-Williams, School of Social Work Garrett Duncan, Department of Education Steve Fazzari, Department of Economics Debra Haire-Joshu, School of Social Work Bob Hansman, School of Architecture Amanda Moore McBride, School of Social Work Timothy McBride, School of Social Work Bob Pollak, Olin Business School and Department of Economics Ramesh Raghavan, School of Social Work Mark Rank, School of Social Work Michael Sherraden, School of Social Work Itai Sened, Department of Political Science and Center for New Institutional Social Sciences Consuelo Wilkins, School of Medicine C ENTER FOR S OCIAL D EVELOPMENT 1 W ASHINGTON U NIVERSITY IN S T .
    [Show full text]
  • Findhorn Ecovillage Demonstration Site 1
    Maria Cooper Duneland shareholder representing Findhorn community youth April 2019 Findhorn Ecovillage Demonstration Site A proposal for North Whins off grid site My vision is a site which serves as: a learning centre through demonstration of small-scale ecovillage technologies and solutions; an entrance point for young people to the community through volunteering/woofing; a safe environment for children and youth to immerse themselves in practical ecovillage life experience; and a space open for community members of all ages to engage with ecovillage ideas and concepts. It would be sponsored by the community, built with local volunteers and woofers, and for the benefit of the community. Physical design Building Small south facing dwelling built in locally available materials (timber frame, stone, cob), equipped with solar panels and PV, woodstove, rainwater tanks. Design: Large common space/kitchen to be used as a space for learning, produce preparation and preservation, and social hang out. Sleeping loft or similar for 2-3 people. Potentially one or two other tiny homes for more private accommodation. Compost toilets and constructed wetland for grey water Vegetable garden and Orchard Producing enough fruit and vegetables for 3-4 people throughout the year Animals Chickens/ducks Experiments with, and demonstration of, simple sustainable technologies e.g. off grid living, biochar, biogas, hot composting, permaculture, biodynamics, etc. Working with the landscape Small and slow solutions through low impact techniques would mean we stay in tune with natural rhythms and can collaborate with the natural features of the site. Social design Run by an onsite manager (myself), together with skilled volunteers/woofers As well as serving as a smallholding livelihood for the site manager, it would be an entrance point for young people who want to stay in the community short term and share/learn practical sustainability skills.
    [Show full text]
  • Gilmar Jose Hellmann.Pdf
    UNIVERSIDADE DO OESTE DO PARANÁ - UNIOESTE PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM DESENVOLVIMENTO REGIONAL E AGRONEGÓCIO GILMAR JOSE HELLMANN RELEVÂNCIA SOCIOECONÔMICA DA GERAÇÃO DE ENERGIA EÓLICA NO DESENVOLVIMENTO REGIONAL SUSTENTÁVEL: ESTUDO DE CASO DO PARQUE EÓLICO ÁGUA DOCE TOLEDO 2013 GILMAR JOSE HELLMANN RELEVÂNCIA SOCIOECONÔMICA DA GERAÇÃO DE ENERGIA EÓLICA NO DESENVOLVIMENTO REGIONAL SUSTENTÁVEL: ESTUDO DE CASO DO PARQUE EÓLICO ÁGUA DOCE Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Desenvolvimento Regional e Agronegócio da Universidade Estadual do Paraná – UNIOESTE para a obtenção do título de Mestre em Desenvolvimento Regional Área de concentração: Economia e Desenvolvimento Regional Orientador: Prof. Dr. Moacir Piffer TOLEDO 2013 Catalogação na Publicação elaborada pela Biblioteca Universitária UNIOESTE/Campus de Toledo. Bibliotecária: Marilene de Fátima Donadel - CRB – 9/924 Hellmann, Gilmar José H477r Relevância socioeconômica da geração de energia eólica no desenvolvimento regional sustentável : um estudo de caso do Parque Eólico Água Doce / Gilmar José Hellmann. – Toledo, PR : [s. n.], 2013. 297 f. : il. [algumas color.], figs., gráfs., tabs., quadros Orientador: Prof. Dr. Moacir Piffer Dissertação (Mestrado em Desenvolvimento Regional e Agronegócio) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná. Campus de Toledo. Centro de Ciências Sociais Aplicadas 1. Energia - Aspectos socioeconômicos - Santa Catarina 2. Energia eólica - Água Doce (SC) 3. Energia renovável 4. Desenvolvimento regional 5. Desenvolvimento sustentável 6. Energia - Fontes alternativas I. Piffer, Moacir, Orient. II. T. CDD 20. ed. 333.92 FOLHA DE APROVAÇÃO Gilmar José Hellmann Desenvolvimento Regional Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Desenvolvimento Regional e Agronegócio da Universidade Estadual do Paraná – UNIOESTE para a obtenção do título de Mestre em Desenvolvimento Regional.
    [Show full text]