Hebrew Text in Praxis: Shaping Stories of Significance
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
HEBREW TEXT IN PRAXIS: SHAPING STORIES OF SIGNIFICANCE Submitted by Catherine Jean Teller BTheol MTheol (Hons) A thesis submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Philosophy National School of Theology Faculty of Theology and Philosophy Australian Catholic University 29th December 2009 ii Statement of sources This thesis contains no material published elsewhere or extracted in whole or in part from a thesis by which I have qualified for or been awarded another degree or diploma. No other person’s work has been used without due acknowledgment in the main text of the thesis. This thesis has not been submitted for the award of any degree or diploma in any other tertiary institution. ____________ Catherine Teller 29th December 2009 iii ABSTRACT The claim of this research, Hebrew Text in Praxis: Shaping Stories of Significance, is that textual narrative, discourse sentences or even single words disclose inner ideational sparks which shape stories of significance. This thesis will show, firstly that in keeping with the idea of Hebrew text in praxis, the entire act of carrying out modern midrash sits well within the traditions and history of the midrashic impulse, and secondly that for the midrashist the telling and retelling of Scripture is about perspective, the relativity of context, and above all an audience. Chapter One, presents an historical and literary discussion of the relationship between Buber’s dialogical hermeneutic and rabbinic midrash. It is the contention of this research that Buber was deeply influenced by midrashic thought and intimately understood the worldview of the Rabbis which led him to incorporate aspects of their hermeneutic treasury to his own reading of the Hebrew text. Chapter Two, explores textual and scholarly evidence of the Hebrew text as an aggadic trope, focusing in the main on the way this process manifests in the methods of parshanut (interpretation) and darshanut (transvaluation). Two areas of concern are explored in this chapter: the origins of making midrash aggada in the Hebrew text itself, and a focus on the pinnacles of development in the extra biblical midrashic recordings of the Rabbis. Chapter Three, attempts to show that the meeting of co-text and situation in equal partnership pact with the Hebrew text projects a cascade of meaning that drives the midrashic impulse and fulfils the midrashic moment. The purpose of this chapter is to contemporize traditional midrashic processes through two midrash models. The rabbinic midrash model and Buber’s leitwort model, incorporate simple and complex ways that embrace the exegetical and imaginative aspects of midrash. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Shalom rav ve toda raba – I wish to express my most sincere gratitude to: Dr. Laurence Woods, the Principal Supervisor, for his professional guidance, critical advice, encouragement, immense patience, and above all, his superior ability to carry out the task of supervision whatever the circumstances, even more in the context of Christian-Jewish discourse, which my thesis necessarily imposed on him. Dr. Terry Veling, the Co-Supervisor, for the valuable encouragement at the beginning of my enrolment as a research student and the ongoing professional support and sustained belief in my academic endeavour, coupled with a genuine interest in the subject matter which forms the core of this thesis. Carmen Ivers, the Candidature & Thesis Officer, Research Higher Degrees, for providing the administrative backbone to my research and for tirelessly offering expertise to assist me towards meeting every deadline and requirement. Prof. Robert Gascoigne, the Head of the National School of Theology, for the professional integrity shown in the making of sound and solid decisions pertaining to my thesis endeavours throughout the time of my enrolment as a research student. v CONTENTS Page Statement of sources ii Abstract iii Acknowledgements iv Introduction 1 Chapter One – 6 The Relationship Between Buber’s Dialogical Hermeneutic and Rabbinic Midrash Chapter Two – 56 Midrash Aggada: Word Begets World Chapter Three – 123 Toward a Modern Midrash: Renewing that Praxis Conclusion 169 Bibliography 176 Glossary 191 1 INTRODUCTION A belief endures within the heart of making midrash. It is the age old conviction that particular ethics and universal truths call out from the Scriptures. The first principle of midrash is that there is no single or correct way to hear the calling of Scripture. Midrash moves moment by moment across both text and time wearing a cape of creative enlightenment. The measure which empowers the delivery of midrash is its aggadic factor – the telling and retelling of “textual truths”. For the midrashist the telling and retelling of Scripture is about perspective, the relativity of context, the art of making midrash and above all an audience. This leads to a second principle of midrash that Scripture was given for human interpretation. The midrashic habit of freely interpreting Scripture derives from a rabbinical view that all words and phrases of the text have multiplicity of meaning.1 The many meanings of Scripture were not intended only for the cognoscenti, since the midrashic impulse, as Hillel instructed, must never be separated from the broad community.2 Therefore appreciation of the interpretative modes of midrash rests with an audience. Accordingly midrash is comprehended through a reciprocal relationship between delivery and the audience who hears it. Students of midrash aggada engage with a scriptural text which lends itself to a variety of hermeneutical methods. The unifying factor for analysis is human awareness in a current context. However, it is the contention of this thesis 2 that without awareness of past and current audiences the process of midrash and its various connections to the Divine cannot be fully experienced. The aim is not one where modern midrash needs to directly emulate rabbinical writings, or even for the modern midrash student to become a mirror image of a rabbinical aggadist. The aim is to encourage a review of the traditional methods for making midrash in order to recapture the intention, interpretative power and fascination of making midrash for an audience. In this way the modern student of midrash through the benefit of generational teachings may master the art of making midrash for current audiences. The claim of this thesis Hebrew Text in Praxis: Shaping Stories of Significance is that the making of modern midrash continues to engage with the ancient calling (ha-Mikra) of Scripture through the situational awareness of the modern reader. In the words of Jacobson modern midrash is not only, a continuation of the midrashic tradition of the rabbinic and medieval periods, but also a product of the revival of interest…that has spread throughout western culture (turning and returning) to the traditional narratives…as important sources of self-understanding.3 In general, the concern of the modern midrashic movement has been to respectfully lift the dynamic of midrash out of the rut of classical existence. Once set free the dynamics of making midrash were then rightfully directed into the present moment. Only in this way could midrash regain that rightful position as a process of contemporary renewal. But the matter of making 3 modern midrash is not just about setting midrash free to exist in a modern praxis. The making of modern midrash is largely dependent on process. In particular, it is the contention of this research that as midrash undergoes constant renewal in a modern context, so too must its very process be revised. Alongside the call for constant renewal of the midrashic process, this thesis also acknowledges that the character of midrash carries with it certain processes which are embedded in the tradition. These processes aid the renewal of midrash via a generational continuum of midrashic awareness. The first chapter of this thesis identifies specific aspects of the work of Martin Buber that make a major contribution to a renewal of the rabbinical midrash process. It is the contention of this research that Buber was deeply influenced by midrashic thought and intimately understood the worldview of the Rabbis which led him to incorporate aspects of their hermeneutic treasury to his own reading of the Hebrew text. While the notion and conventions of midrash have their roots in antiquity this thesis seeks to find a modern approach that respects the principles and methodology of traditional midrash. In fact, the midrashic impulse in the form of an aggadic trope is evidenced within Scripture itself. The second chapter of this thesis explores textual and scholarly evidence of the Hebrew text as an aggadic trope, focusing in the main on the way this process is discernible in the methods of parshanut (interpretation) and darshanut 4 (transvaluation). In particular two areas of concern to this thesis are explored, firstly the origins of making midrash aggada in the Hebrew text itself, and secondly a focus on the pinnacles of development in the extra biblical midrashic recordings of the Rabbis. As much as the making of modern midrash has undergone constant renewal very little work has been done on offering any process outside of encouraging approaches to Scripture which follow the division of the text into parashah and haftarah.4 To meet the demands of the modern world and the sharing of midrash with other faiths, modern midrashists may need to respectfully consider a more open approach to the Scriptures without the constraints of parashah and haftarah boundaries.5 This research offers a revision of two traditional midrashic processes put forward in a new form without the constraints of the division of the text into parashah and haftarah portions. Chapter three of this thesis puts forward these two models which are not dependent on liturgical divisions in the text. They are the “Rabbinic Midrash Model” and the “Buber Leitwort Model”. Each process gives a consideration to the reader in their own time and space.