DOCSLIB.ORG

BUCKLEY KING MICHAEL SALCIDO 2 2020 North Central Avenue, Suite 1120 Phoenix, AZ 85004 3 Telephone: 602/424-2550 602/424-2566 (Fax) 4 [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BUCKLEY KING MICHAEL SALCIDO 2 2020 North Central Avenue, Suite 1120 Phoenix, AZ 85004 3 Telephone: 602/424-2550 602/424-2566 (Fax) 4 Salcido@Buckleyking.Com 1 BUCKLEY KING MICHAEL SALCIDO 2 2020 North Central Avenue, Suite 1120 Phoenix, AZ 85004 3 Telephone: 602/424-2550 602/424-2566 (fax) 4 [email protected] 5 Liaison Counsel 6 COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 7 JEFFREY W. LAWRENCE 100 Pine Street, Suite 2600 8 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415/288-4545 9 415/288-4534 (fax) [email protected] 10 Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 13 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 617 PENSION No. 2:06-cv-02674-RCB 14 AND WELFARE FUNDS, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, CLASS ACTION 15 Plaintiff, LEAD PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FOR 16 VIOLATIONS OF THE FEDERAL vs. SECURITIES LAWS 17 APOLLO GROUP, INC.; JOHN G. 18 SPERLING; TODD S. NELSON; KENDA B. GONZALES; DANIEL E. BACHUS; 19 JOHN BLAIR; JOHN R. NORTON III; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL HEDY GOVENAR; BRIAN E. 20 MUELLER; DINO J. DECONCINI; PETER SPERLING; and LAURA 21 PALMER NOONE, 22 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 2:06-cv-02674-RCB Document 71 Filed 11/23/2007 Page 1 of 103 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Page 3 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 4 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE............................................................................... 6 5 III. PARTIE S .................................................................................................................. 6 6 IV. DEFENDANTS' DUTIES ..................................................................................... 10 7 A. Apollo's Code of Ethics .............................................................................. 12 8 B. Defendants' Duties with Respect to Granting and Approving Stock 9 Option Grants .............................................................................................. 14 10 C. Apollo's Stock Option Plans ....................................................................... 16 11 IV DEFENDANTS' FRAUDULENT SCHEME: BACKDATED STOCK OPTION GRANTS AT APOLLO ......................................................................... 17 12 A. 1998 Option Grants ..................................................................................... 18 13 B. 1999 Option Grants ..................................................................................... 19 14 C. 2000 Option Grants ..................................................................................... 19 15 D. 2001 Option Grants ..................................................................................... 21 16 VI. DEFENDANTS' FALSE AND MISLEADING STATEMENTS ISSUED 17 DURING THE CLASS PERIOD ........................................................................... 23 18 VII. THE TRUTH BEGINS TO EMERGE................................................................... 56 19 A. The Restatement .......................................................................................... 61 20 VIII. ADDITIONAL ALLEGATIONS OF SCIENTER ................................................ 71 21 A. The Company' s Admissions and Recent Actions Establish Defendants ' Scienter ................................................................................... 72 22 B. Defendants' Specific Participation in the Backdating Establishes 23 Their Scienter .............................................................................................. 73 24 C. Defendants' Personal Enrichment Through Lucrative Stock Option Grants and Insider Trading Supports a Finding of Scienter........................ 79 25 D. The Fact that Failing to Report Compensation Expenses from 26 Backdated Options Was Essential to Maintaining Apollo's Profitable Performance Supports a Strong Inference of Scienter ................................ 79 27 E. The Mass "Retirements of Apollo Directors and Executives 28 Supports a Strong Inference of Scienter...................................................... 81 2:06-cv-02674-RCB Document 71 filed 11/23/2007 Page 2 of 103 1 2 Page 3 IX. LOSS CAUSATION .............................................................................................. 81 4 X. APPLICABILITY OF PRESUMPTION OF RELIANCE: FRAUD-ON- THE-MARKET DOCTRINE ................................................................................. 83 5 XI. APPLICABILITY OF THE AFFILIATED UTE PRESUMPTION OF 6 RELIANCE ............................................................................................................ 84 7 XII. NO SAFE HARBOR .............................................................................................. 84 8 XIII. PLAINTIFFS' CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS .............................................. 85 9 For Violation of § 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 1 Ob-5 Against All Defendants 10 SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF ...................................................................................... 92 11 For Violation of §20A of the Exchange Act Against All Defendants 12 THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF .......................................................................................... 94 13 For Violation of §20(a) of the Exchange Act Against All Defendants 14 FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF ...................................................................................... 94 15 For Breach of Fiduciary Duty and/or Aiding and Abetting Against All 16 Defendants 17 FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF ........................................................................................... 95 18 Civil Conspiracy to Commit Fraud Against Defendants Nelson, Blair, Norton, Gonzales, Bachus and Mueller 19 PRAYER FOR RELIEF .................................................................................................... 95 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2:06-cv-02674-RCB Document 71 filed 11/23/2007 Page 3 of 103 1 I I. INTRODUCTION 2 1. Lead Plaintiff, the Pension Trust Fund For Operating Engineers ("Operating 3 Engineers or "Lead Plaintiff ), brings this federal securities law class action on behalf of 4 itself and all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired the publicly traded securities of 5 Apollo Group Inc. ("Apollo or the "Company) between November 28, 2001 and 6 October 18, 2006 (the "Class Period ), against Apollo and certain of its officers and/or 7 directors for violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act ) and 8 Arizona state law. 9 2. This action involves an admitted fraudulent scheme that spanned more than 10 five years. At the crux of the fraudulent scheme was a practice whereby defendants 11 intentionally manipulated stock option grants to the Company' s officers, directors and 12 employees in order to provide the recipients with a more profitable exercise price and to 13 under-report the Company ' s expenses and thereby overstate the Company ' s earnings. As a 14 result of this scheme, Apollo has been forced to restate its previously filed financial 15 statements for fiscal years 2001 through the second quarter of2006 by over $59 million (the 16 "Restatement ). Defendants ' scheme caused the Company' s financial statements issued 17 during the Class Period to be materially false and misleading, resulting in an artificial 18 inflation of the Company' s stock price, the disclosure of which caused investors to lose 19 hundreds of millions of dollars. By engaging in this scheme, defendants, among other 20 things, concealed that Apollo was not recording material compensation expenses and was 21 materially overstating its net income and earnings per share, in violation of the Generally 22 Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP ). 23 3. A stock option granted to an employee ofa corporation allows the employee to 24 purchase a specified number of shares of company stock at a specified price - referred to as 25 the "exercise price or "strike price - for a specified period of time. To qualify for 26 favorable accounting and tax treatment, options are often required to be priced at the market 27 price on the date of the grant, as Apollo's were required to be, in order to incentivize 28 corporate performance and profitability by good, honest management efforts. When the 2:06-cv-02674-RCB Document 71 - Filed 11/23/2007 Page 4 of 103 1 employee exercises the option, he or she purchases the stock from the company at the 2 exercise price, regardless of the stock's market price at the time the option is exercised. If 3 the Company has grown and prospered, the share price will have increased from the strike 4 price and the option grantee will pocket the difference. Stock options are granted by public 5 companies as part of compensation packages for employees and executives to align their 6 interests with those of the shareholders. 7 4. Where, however, the system is abused by backdating the options, that is, 8 picking an option-grant date earlier and at a lower price than are the actual date the option 9 was granted- or by "spring-loading, i.e., granting the stock optionjust before the company 10 is going to issue positive news which will likely push the stock price up, the executive gets 11 an instant, unearned profit and the incentive to grow the company is gone because the 12 executive has already made a profit without doing anything. Further, the company is hurt as 13 the spread between the true grant exercise price and the market price is required by law to be 14 treated as compensation expense, which reduces profits, results in the corporate stock option 15 plan losing its tax protection and the corporation's internal non-public information is 16 misappropriated by the executives for their personal profit. Shareholders and share
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Apollo Group, Inc
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) [ü] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended: August 31, 2002 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number : 0-25232 APOLLO GROUP, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) ARIZONA 86-0419443 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) incorporation or organization) 4615 EAST ELWOOD STREET, PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85040 (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (480) 966-5394 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None None (Title of each class) (Name of each exchange on which registered) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Apollo Education Group Class A common stock, no par value University of Phoenix Online common stock, no par value (Title of class) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ ü] No [ ] Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
    [Show full text]
  • Sponsorship Prospectus
    June 27 – July 1, 2016 • The Mirage, Las Vegas SPONSORSHIP PROSPECTUS “Not only is it a great show and a great environment to be in but this show more so than the any other shows that we attend directly represent the heart of our business and that is customer service, customer engagement, and call center technologies.” -Shane Chuvalas, Technical Sales Consultant, Interactive Intelligence 2016 CCW Diamond Sponsor 2 www.callcenterweek.com Corporate Practitioners and Solution Providers both consider CCW the MUST ATTEND event brand WHY? • Neutral Voice – We are vendor agnostic & holistic – serving everyone from start-ups to large scale solution providers and decision-makers that are simple looking for the best ideas to optimize and expand their operations. • Dedicated Content Focus – Continual research throughout the year to uncover the best stories, told by the top leaders. This is our day job. • ROI Centric – We are a business and recognize that everyone who steps who invests in CCW whether you are a delegate attendee or a sponsor must see an ROI. We focus on preparation, innovate ways to optimize the experience and focus on the details. • The Trusted Place Where Business Gets Done - Our end-users come to shop for vendors. Our vendors are prepared to scale and personalize. 3 www.callcenterweek.com “One thing I thought that was just great today is the attendance in the expo hall… It was just packed all day today. And I think that demonstrate just how interested the attendees are in the newer technologies and some of the processes that can
    [Show full text]
  • FTSE Global All Cap Ex Canada China a Inclusion
    FTSE PUBLICATIONS FTSE Global All Cap ex Canada 19 February 2017 China A Inclusion Indicative Index Weight Data as at Closing on 30 December 2016 Index Index Index Constituent Country Constituent Country Constituent Country weight (%) weight (%) weight (%) 13 Holdings <0.005 HONG KONG Ace Hardware Indonesia <0.005 INDONESIA Aegion Corp. <0.005 USA 1st Source <0.005 USA Acea <0.005 ITALY Aegon NV 0.02 NETHERLANDS 2U <0.005 USA Acer <0.005 TAIWAN Aena S.A. 0.02 SPAIN 360 Capital Industrial Fund <0.005 AUSTRALIA Acerinox <0.005 SPAIN Aeon 0.02 JAPAN 361 Degrees International (P Chip) <0.005 CHINA Aces Electronic Co. Ltd. <0.005 TAIWAN Aeon (M) <0.005 MALAYSIA 3-D Systems <0.005 USA Achilles <0.005 JAPAN AEON DELIGHT <0.005 JAPAN 3i Group 0.02 UNITED Achillion Pharmaceuticals <0.005 USA Aeon Fantasy <0.005 JAPAN KINGDOM ACI Worldwide 0.01 USA AEON Financial Service <0.005 JAPAN 3M Company 0.26 USA Ackermans & Van Haaren 0.01 BELGIUM Aeon Mall <0.005 JAPAN 3S Korea <0.005 KOREA Acom <0.005 JAPAN AerCap Holdings N.V. 0.02 USA 3SBio (P Chip) <0.005 CHINA Aconex <0.005 AUSTRALIA Aeroflot <0.005 RUSSIA 77 Bank <0.005 JAPAN Acorda Therapeutics <0.005 USA Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings <0.005 USA 888 Holdings <0.005 UNITED Acron JSC <0.005 RUSSIA Aeroports de Paris 0.01 FRANCE KINGDOM Acrux <0.005 AUSTRALIA Aerospace Communications Holdings (A) <0.005 CHINA 8x8 <0.005 USA ACS Actividades Cons y Serv 0.01 SPAIN Aerospace Hi-Tech (A) <0.005 CHINA A P Moller - Maersk A 0.02 DENMARK Actelion Hldg N 0.05 SWITZERLAND Aerosun (A) <0.005 CHINA A P Moller - Maersk B 0.02 DENMARK Activision Blizzard 0.06 USA AeroVironment <0.005 USA A.G.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Version
    ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM ERASMUS SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS MSc Economics & Business Economics Master Thesis Financial Economics The formation of prominent private equity clubs and the involved alignment costs in club leveraged buyouts Author: Jurjen Spelde Student ID number: 454457 Thesis supervisor: Y.S. Gangaram-Panday MSc Second reader: Dr. J. Lemmen Date final version: 27-08-2020 J. Spelde (2020) Abstract In this research, I analyzed the pricing, target firm characteristics and involved alignment costs in club deal leveraged buyouts. Using a dataset of completed and withdrawn leveraged buyouts of publicly traded U.S. targets, I found that target shareholders receive between approximately 8,5% and 34% lower premiums compared to sole-sponsored leveraged buyouts in the pre-2006 time period. There is no difference in the premium in the post-2005 time period. These results are robust to the usual M&A control variables, including size, risk, and industry and time fixed effects. By examining withdrawn deals, I studied two influences: (1) the likelihood of a completed deal after the announcement is lower for club leveraged buyouts consisting of one merely one prominent private equity firm compared to sole-sponsored private equity deals, and (2) the duration between the announcement date and the date of completion/withdrawal is longer compared to sole-sponsored private equity deals, also merely for clubs consisting of one prominent private equity firm. I found motives for capital constraints in the post-2005 time period which is merely evident for clubs consisting of two prominent private equity firms, but no indication in favor of diversification motives.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMUNICATIONS WORLD/Spring-Summer 1977 } New Products
    SPRING SUMMER 1977 $1.35 02003 EN :ommunicationsMN INCLUDING THE COMPLETE NIa Ett RLD AM FM TV SHORTWAVE wigip .7.-"FtEC . AUIO CO 1,1C National Radio Company HRO-600 communications receiver Where and When to - Hear Overseas English Language Broadcasts :test Bands for Around the Clock Listening Eavesdropping on the Utilities Joining a Radio Club Plus- How to Buy a SW Receiver How to pile up a QSL card collection L, How to tune in the police, fire fighters, aeronautical, national weather service, ship-to-shore, radio paging ysterns and more ! By the Editors of ELEMENTARY ELECTRONICS sr r _r_r_é.rc7rr itJA Jr.f!rAgMIOJ1zlÇfqalHnaW1ilAM 1IRT 11.Atiti 4;pw` "4Og5/OE .i q}+'TO }vOiÿ Y1Q q -.717 ßq7` 1.4 CIE's FCC LICENSE WARRANTY OF SUCCESS CIE warrants that when you enroll in any CIE course which includes FCC License preparation, you will, upon successful completion of the course and the FCC License material, pass the Government FCC Examination for the License for which your course prepared you. If you do not pass the appro- priate FCC Examination, you will be entitled to a full refund of an amount 4 equal to the cash price for CIE's "First Class FCC License Course," No. 3. This warranty will remain in effect from the date of your enrollment o1 to 90 days after the expiration o of the completion time allowed for your course. <. x® ¡xJ 7É7` qt-rV) C/-v\.) C \ )C2u\)C/ m cak.) C /rtyArc4=-J CIE's Warranty says a lot to you! A lot about CIE's FCC License training program, designed by experts to give you the best in Electronics programs...and a lot more about our school.
    [Show full text]
  • M&A Market Overview
    www.peakstone.com Consumer & Retail Industry M&A Update January 2017 Consumer & Retail M&A Update | January 2017 Consumer & Retail Industry Update . For 2016, strategic buyers accounted for 85% of Consumer and Retail M&A transactions. During 2015, strategic buyers accounted for 90% of the transactions. Many Consumer and Retail categories continue to outperform the S&P 500. Select recent notable publicly announced M&A transactions: o Symantec Corporation signed a definitive agreement to acquire LifeLock, Inc. for approximately $2.3 billion. o Samsung Electronics America, Inc. entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Harman International Industries, Incorporated for $8 billion in cash. o Bain Capital L.P. and Bow Street, LLC entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Blue Nile Inc. for approximately $490 million. o American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings Inc. entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Metaldyne Performance Group Inc. for approximately $1.5 billion. o Polaris Industries Inc. entered into an agreement to acquire Transamerican Auto Parts Company, LLC for approximately $670 million. o Bass Pro Group, LLC entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Cabela's Incorporated for $4.6 billion. o Eldorado Resorts, Inc. entered into a definitive merger agreement to acquire Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. for approximately $990 million. 1 Consumer & Retail M&A Update | January 2017 U.S. Consumer & Retail Industry - M&A Market Overview U.S. Consumer & Retail transaction activity has been strong U.S. Consumer & Retail Transactions
    [Show full text]
  • Esg Report Volume 12
    How Apollo is making change happen in companies, communities, and the world ESG Annual Report Volume 12 APOLLO ESG REPORT VOLUME 12 Table of Contents Introduction 03 A Message from Apollo’s Leaders 04 ESG Achievements 05 From Apollo’s Global Head of ESG 06 Apollo’s ESG Philosophy 07 Apollo Global Management by the Numbers 08 Reporting Companies Overview 10 Governance and Transparency 11 Sustainable Consumption and Production 17 Climate Action 23 Respect for Workers 30 Responsible Citizenship 40 Company Reports 49 Appendix 103 Locations 120 2 APOLLO ESG REPORT VOLUME 12 What is Apollo’s ESG effect? Since the inception of our ESG engagement and reporting program in 2008, the cumulative numbers are impressive: 465 ESG reports and 79,000+ ESG data points submitted to Apollo by more than 150 reporting companies; 100+ site visits by Apollo’s ESG team. This 12th report reflects Apollo’s growth. The report extends beyond private equity funds to our capital solutions clients (to the extent possible) and to Apollo itself — where we see both our investments and our operations through an ESG lens. But what do the numbers add up to? Apollo ESG reporting is a year-round program enlisting dozens of people across the portfolio in thousands of hours of effort — to what effect? You’ll read here a wealth of examples that show how engaging in ESG issues helps Apollo to expand opportunities and help build companies and communities, while creating value for our clients and shareholders — we call this the Apollo effect. The Apollo effect can be measured in millions of tons of emissions averted, waste recycled or avoided, kWh of energy saved or generated renewably; in volunteer hours and dollar donations.
    [Show full text]
  • Rameses Te Lomingkit, Et Al. V. Apollo Education Group Incorporated, Et
    Case 2:16-cv-00689-JAT Document 82 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 100 1 TIFFANY & BOSCO P.A. RICHARD G. HIMELRICK (State Bar No. 004738) 2 2525 East Camelback Road, Seventh Floor Phoenix, AZ 85016 3 Tel: (602) 255-6000 [email protected] 4 Local Counsel for Lead Plaintiff 5 Government of Guam Retirement Fund 6 BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER 7 & GROSSMANN LLP BLAIR A. NICHOLAS (pro hac vice) 8 DAVID R. STICKNEY (pro hac vice) BRANDON MARSH (pro hac vice) 9 12481 High Bluff Drive, Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92130 10 Tel: (858) 793-0070 [email protected] 11 [email protected] [email protected] 12 Counsel for Lead Plaintiff 13 Government of Guam Retirement Fund and Lead Counsel for the Class 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 17 Rameses Te Lomingkit, Individually And No. 2:16-cv-00689-PHX-JAT On Behalf Of All Others Similarly 18 Situated, AMENDED CLASS ACTION 19 COMPLAINT FOR Plaintiff, VIOLATIONS OF THE 20 FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS 21 v. 22 Apollo Education Group, Inc. (F/K/A CLASS ACTION Apollo Group, Inc.); Peter V. Sperling; 23 Gregory W. Cappelli; and Brian L. Swartz, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 24 Defendants. 25 26 27 28 Case 2:16-cv-00689-JAT Document 82 Filed 03/09/17 Page 2 of 100 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Page 3 I. NATURE OF THE ACTION ................................................................................... 2 4 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE ............................................................................... 6 5 III. THE PARTIES ......................................................................................................... 6 6 A. Plaintiffs ........................................................................................................ 6 7 B. Defendants ..................................................................................................... 7 8 IV. SUMMARY OF THE ACTION .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Primary & Secondary Sources
    Primary & Secondary Sources Brands & Products Agencies & Clients Media & Content Influencers & Licensees Organizations & Associations Government & Education Research & Data Multicultural Media Forecast 2019: Primary & Secondary Sources COPYRIGHT U.S. Multicultural Media Forecast 2019 Exclusive market research & strategic intelligence from PQ Media – Intelligent data for smarter business decisions In partnership with the Alliance for Inclusive and Multicultural Marketing at the Association of National Advertisers Co-authored at PQM by: Patrick Quinn – President & CEO Leo Kivijarv, PhD – EVP & Research Director Editorial Support at AIMM by: Bill Duggan – Group Executive Vice President, ANA Claudine Waite – Director, Content Marketing, Committees & Conferences, ANA Carlos Santiago – President & Chief Strategist, Santiago Solutions Group Except by express prior written permission from PQ Media LLC or the Association of National Advertisers, no part of this work may be copied or publicly distributed, displayed or disseminated by any means of publication or communication now known or developed hereafter, including in or by any: (i) directory or compilation or other printed publication; (ii) information storage or retrieval system; (iii) electronic device, including any analog or digital visual or audiovisual device or product. PQ Media and the Alliance for Inclusive and Multicultural Marketing at the Association of National Advertisers will protect and defend their copyright and all their other rights in this publication, including under the laws of copyright, misappropriation, trade secrets and unfair competition. All information and data contained in this report is obtained by PQ Media from sources that PQ Media believes to be accurate and reliable. However, errors and omissions in this report may result from human error and malfunctions in electronic conversion and transmission of textual and numeric data.
    [Show full text]
  • Edukacja – Technika – Informatyka Education – Technology – Computer Science
    ISSN 2080-9069 EDUKACJA – TECHNIKA – INFORMATYKA EDUCATION – TECHNOLOGY – COMPUTER SCIENCE KWARTALNIK NAUKOWY NR 1/23/2018 QUARTERLY JOURNAL No 1/23/2018 WYDAWNICTWO UNIWERSYTETU RZESZOWSKIEGO RZESZÓW 2018 1 EDUKACJA – TECHNIKA – INFORMATYKA / EDUCATION – TECHNOLOGY – COMPUTER SCIENCE Kwartalnik Naukowy Nr 1(23)/2018 / Quarterly Journal No 1/23/2018 MIĘDZYNARODOWA RADA NAUKOWA / INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Dr hab. prof. UR Wojciech Walat – Uniwersytet Rzeszowski (Polska) – przewodniczący Prof. dr hab. Waldemar Furmanek – Uniwersytet Rzeszowski (Polska) – przewodniczący honorowy Dr Waldemar Lib – Uniwersytet Rzeszowski (Polska) – sekretarz Prof. dr hab. inż. Henryk Bednarczyk – Instytut Technologii Eksploatacji w Radomiu (Polska) Doc. PhDr. Miroslav Chráska, Ph.D. – Uniwersytet w Ołomuńcu (Czechy) Dr hab. prof. UR Stanisław Domoradzki – Uniwersytet Rzeszowski (Polska) Prof. PaedDr. Milan Ďuriš, CSc. – Uniwersytet Mateja Bela w Bańskiej Bystrzycy (Słowacja) Prof. PhD. Olga Filatova – Vladimir State University Named A&N Stoletovs (Rosja) Prof. PhD. Vlado Galičić – Uniwersytet w Rijece (Chorwacja) Doc. PhD. Slavoljub Hilcenko – Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa w Suboticy (Serbia) Prof. Ing. Tomáš Kozík, DrSc. – Uniwersytet Konstantyna Filozofa w Nitrze (Słowacja) Dr hab. prof. UP Krzysztof Kraszewski – Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny w Krakowie (Polska) Prof. dr hab. Stefan M. Kwiatkowski – Komitet Nauk Pedagogicznych PAN w Warszawie (Polska) Prof. PhD. Oksana Nagorniuk – Narodowy Uniwersytet Inżynierii Środowiska w Kijowie (Ukraina) Dr hab. prof. UP Henryk Noga – Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny w Krakowie (Polska) Dr hab. prof. UR Aleksander Piecuch – Uniwersytet Rzeszowski (Polska) Prof. dr hab. Mario Plenkowić – Uniwersytet w Zagrzebiu (Chorwacja) Dr hab. prof. PK Czesław Plewka – Politechnika Koszalińska (Polska) Prof. dr hab. Natalia Ridei – Narodowy Uniwersytet Inżynierii Środowiska w Kijowie (Ukraina) Doc. Ing. Čestmír Serafín, Dr. Ing-Paed. – Uniwersytet w Ołomuńcu (Czechy) Dr hab.
    [Show full text]
  • Post Event Executive Report
    Post Event Executive Report The global leader in customer service transformation Personalizing your journey one step at a time www.callcenterweek.com EXPO HALL INTERACTIVE LEARNING CALL CENTER IQUBE NETWORKING DRUM CAFÉ ADVISORY BOARD MEETING FOLLOW CCW ONLINE: #CallCenterWeek · #CCWSponsor · #CCWAwards · #CCWSpeaker Table of Contents Letter from the Chairman ..........................................4 2015 Attendee Profile .................................................. 5 Letter from Editor .......................................................... 6 Top themes of CCW 2015 Create a Winning Culture ............................................ 7 AWARDS CEREMONY Customer-Centricity & Experience ...................... 10 Train, Empower & Engage..........................................12 Technology ........................................................................15 Personalization.................................................................17 2015 Video-Recorded Presentations .................19 Attending Organizations ......................................... 20 Sponsors & Exhibitors .................................................21 Upcoming Events..........................................................22 PEER CONNECTION About Call Center IQ is the premier, 24/7/365 customer service community that leverages data, intelligence and networking from more than 85,000 call center and customer service leaders to keep you ahead of the curve — and your competition. Join for free today: www.callcenter-iq.com Official Post Show Report
    [Show full text]
  • September/October 2016 Bized
    STEPPING UP B-SCHOOLS' NEXT PHASE CAREER BOOSTERS WHEN B-SCHOOL DEANS AACSB’S NEW CHAIR SANTIAGO HANDS-ON APPROACHES BECOME PROVOSTS IÑIGUEZ SEES TRANSFORMATION PREPARE STUDENTS FOR OR PRESIDENTS P. 45 AHEAD FOR B-SCHOOLS P. 50 REAL-WORLD BUSINESS P. 56 AACSB INTERNATIONAL SEPTEMBER | OCTOBER 2016 SCHOLARS, TEACHERS, LEADERS... B-SCHOOL FACULTY ARE TAKING ON A WIDER RANGE OF ROLES P. 16 Launched more than 40 years ago, the Professional MBA program at the Darla Moore School of Business was the first part-time MBA program of its kind offering a blended learning format to working professionals. Today the program offers the convenience of earning a USC MBA on campus in Columbia, or in one of six other prime business locations across South Carolina and Charlotte, WE’VEWE’VE STILLSTILL GOTGOT IT.IT. N.C. With an array of immersive experiences and the opportunity for real-time and asynchronous engagement, the program’s blended learning model offers maximum flexibility to students. The academic resources of a world-class university and the multiple technologies utilized allow for #1 Online MBA in the nation— pedagogical innovation that enhances student experience. two years in a row. Temple University’s Fox School of Business outranks the competition again, according to U.S. News & World Report. The Fox Online MBA has been ranked in the top slot for two consecutive years in the publication’s Best Online MBA & Graduate Business Programs rankings, and was the only program in the 2016 7 locations in Students learn through a Employees from 200 edition to receive a perfect score for student engagement, faculty credentials South Carolina and combination of real-time companies in the South and training, student services, and more.
    [Show full text]