DOCSLIB.ORG

Procopius, with an English Translation by H.B. Dewing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Procopius, with an English Translation by H.B. Dewing :LO =Qn THE LOEB CLASSICAL LIBRARY FOUNDED BY JAMES LOEB, LL.D. EDITED BY tT. E. PAGE, C.H., LITT.D. fE. CAPPS, PH.D., LL.D. tW. H. D. ROUSE, litt.d. L. A. POST, l.h.d. E. H. WARMINGTON, m.a., f.r.hlst.soc. PROCOPIUS IV PROCOPIUS WITH AN ENGLISH TRANSLATION BY H. B. DEWING IN SEVEN VOLUMES IV HISTORY OF THE WARS, BOOKS VI {continued) and VII LONDON WILLIAM HEINEMANN LTD CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS MCMLXII First printed 1924 Reprinted 1954, 1962 Printed in Great Britain CONTENTS PAOK HISTORY OF THE WARS— BOOK VI.—THE GOTHIC WAR {contimied) .... 1 ROOK VII. — THE GOTHIC WAR (continued) .... 149 INDEX , 469 Map—Northern Italy At end PROCOPIUS OF CAESAREA HISTORY OF THE WARS: BOOK VI THE GOTHIC WAR {continued) nPOKOniOY KAI2APE122: TDEP THN nOAEMnN AOrOS EKTOS XVI BeXtcrdpio^ Se koI NapaPj'; ^vv dfxcporepoLf; (nparevixacFLV dWijXoa dve/xiyvvvTO d/jL(f)l ttoXlv ^ipjjiov, r) KeiTai fjuev irapd ^ rrjv ^)iova rod ^lovlov koXttov, dire^et Se Av^l/jlov TroXeo)? 7)/jLipa<; oBov. 2 ivravOa Be ^vv irdai to?? rov arparov dp')(^ovaiv iv ^ovXfj eTroLovvTo, ony irore a (plat irporepov 3 eVi Tou? 7ToXeiJLLou<; lovai fxaXXov ^vvoiaeL.'^ tjv T€ 'ydp eirl tou? ^Apljiivov TToXtopKOvvra^ X^PV~ aeiav, to 1)9 iv Av^i/x^p vTrooirrevov /jlt) Kara vootov l6vT€<; cr^a? re koI 'Fco/jLaLOV<; tou? ravrrj a)K7]' /jL€Vov<; TO, dvTjKecTTa, 0)9 TO e//co9, Bpdacoai, koI dfKpl T0t9 7ro\iopfcovfi€voi.<; iSeijuaivov firj rfj 4 diropia rwv dva^yKaiwv Betvov tl irdOwcnv. ol fjLev ovv irXelcTTot 'Icodvprj ;;^aX,e7rw9 e)^ovT€<i eVot- oifVTO Toi/? X6<yov<;. iireKuXovp ydp ol ore Opdaeu * iraph. K : inpi L. ' Ivvoiffii. Hoeschel : Iwoiaeiv MSS. PROCOPIUS OF CAESAREA HISTORY OF THE WARS : BOOK VI THE GOTHIC WAR {continued) XVI Belisarius and Narses came together with their two armies near the city of Firmum,i which lies on the shore of the Ionian Gulf, and is one day's journey distant from the city of Auximus. In that place they began to hold conferences with all the commanders of the army, considering at what par- ticular point it would be most to their advantage to make the first attack upon the enemy. For if, on the one hand, they should proceed against the forces besieging Ariminum, they suspected that the Goths in Auximus would in all probability, taking them in the rear, inflict irreparable harm both upon them and upon the Romans who lived in that region ; but, on the other hand, they were anxious concerning the besieged, dreading lest by reason of their lack of provisions they should suffer some great misfortune. Now the majority were hostile toward John, and made their accordingly speeches ; and the charge they brought against him was that he had been ^ Modem Fermo. PROCOPIUS OF CAESAREA r€ ako'yicrrw kol y^prjiiaTaiv ttoWwv epcori es Toaov Kivhvvov d(f)iKono, kol ovk iv rci^et ovBe ^ BeXtcrtt/9fo? i^yjyetTO iwv '^cl tov iroXe^xov irepai- 5 vecrdai. Napo-^? Be (fcal yap oi (f^LXraro'^ rjv 'l(i)dvvr}<:^ dvdpdi'TTwv dirdvTwv) Seiaa<; /jltj BeXt- adpio<^ TTpo*; ra rol^ dp')(^ovaiv elprj/iiva ivSov^ iv hevrepw ra iv 'Apc/jLiVfo Trpdy/jbara OP/tul eXefe roidSe' 6 "Ovk iv TOt? elcoOoai hLaXoyi^ecrOe, dvhpe^ dpxovre^, ovhk virep (op dv Ti? ecKorcof; ayLt^t- yvo7](T€i6 rrjv ^ovXrjV exere, aXV iv ot? irdpean Kul rot? e? TToXifjiov irelpav ovSefilav iXOovai rrjv aipecLV avTOcyehidi^ovcjiv eXeadai rd Kpeiaaw. 7 el fiev yap 6 re klvBvvo^ ev law elvai hoKsl KaX ^Xd^o<; eKarepcodev rot? ye aTTorvxovaiv avrl- iraXov, ^ovXeveadai re UavM^ d^iov kuI Xoyi,- (T/iwv €7rl irXelarov lovaiv ^ ovto) TroielcrOat rvjv 8 virep -Twv nrapovrtov Bidyvwaiv. r]p,el'^ he el pev rrjv €9 Av^i/u,ov TTpocr/SoXrjv e? dXXov rivd ^^/ooi^oi^ diToOeaOai ^ovXoipeOa, rrjv ^7)p,Lav iv roU dvay- KaioL<; ovSapw'i e^opev tl yap dv fiera^v rb htaXXdaaov eirj; iv 'hpip,iv(p Be, co? to etVo?, acjiaXevre^, el prj Xlav rriKpov elirelv rj, rrjv 9 'Vwpiaiwv la^yv KaraXvcropev. el p^ev ovv Icodv- vr)<; 6? ra? era? ivToXd^ v^piaev, dpiare l^eXto-dpie, TToXXrjv ye rrjv Blktjv e;^6t? Trap' ifcelvov Xapoav, iirei cot, Trdpeajt aco^eiv t€ tov iinaiKOTa Kai ' 'iwa.vvT)s K : om. L. ' lovtTiv K : -noiovciv L. : HISTORY OF THE WARS, VI. xvi. 4-9 moved by unreasoning daring and a desire to gain great sums of money to place himself in his present dangerous })Osition, and that he would not allow the operations of the war to be carried out in due order nor in the manner prescribed by Belisarius. But Narses, who loved John above all other men, beginning to be fearful lest Belisarius should give way to the words of the officers and treat the situa- tion at Ariminum as of secondary importance, spoke as follows " Fellow officers, you are not debating a question of the customary sort, nor are you holding this council regarding a situation about which one would naturally be in doubt, but in circumstances where it is possible even for those who have had no experience of war to make their choice offliand and in so doing to choose the better course. For if it seems to be true that each of these two alternatives offers to those who fail an equal degree of danger and evenly balanced possibilities of mischief, it is alto- gether worth while to deliberate and to go most thoroughly into the arguments, and only then to make our decision regarding the situation before us. But if we should wish to put off the assault upon Auximus to some other time, the penalty we shall suffer will involve in no way any vital interest of ours ; for what difference could arise during the interval ? But if we fail at Ariminum, we shall in all probability, if it is not too bitter a thing to say, shatter the strength of the Romans. Now if John treated your commands with insolence, most excellent Belisarius, the atonement you have already exacted from him is surely ample, since it is now in your power either to save him in his reverse or to abandon PROCOPIUS OF CAESAREA 10 TOt? TToXe/iLot-'; nrpoteaOai. aKoirei he fjbrj Ta<; TTOLvaf; (x)v Icodvvi]^ a'^/vorjaa<^ rjiiapre irapa ^aai- A,e&)? re koI ^'ijioyv \d^r)<;. el <ydp vvv \\pi,/xivov e^eXwai VotOol, arpaT'q'yov re avTo2<^ 'Fco/jiaLO)v BpaaryjpLov kol arpdrev/jLa oXov koI itoXlv Kari]- Koov ^aaiXel SopvdXcorov TreiroLrjaOai ^vfilSriaeTai. 11 Koi ovK dy^pi TovTov arrjcTeraL to heivov, dXXd Kal ^v/jL7racrav KaraarrjcraL rrjv rov iroXe/jLov Su- vrjaerai rv^ijv. ovrwal yap Xoyi^ov nrepl tmv iroXefiiwv, cb? irXrjOei fxev arparLcoTcov en kol vvv rj/nMV irapd ttoXvjTpoyXpvjIAK> ^'^ dvavhpiav he oh 7roXXd/CL<^ ia(f)dXy]aav e/jiTre'jrTcoKaaiv.^ elfcoTco^;' TO yap tt}? TV')(y]<; evavriwfia Trdaav avrcov ttjv 12 Trapprjaiav ucpeiXero. rjv tolvvv ev rw Trapovri evr]/jL€prj<Tcocn, to re (fypovrj/xa ovk e? fiaKpav dTToXijyjrovTaL Kal to Xolitov ovk ef dvTiirdXov fjLovov yj/jLiv tt}? roXfjurji^, dXXa Kal TroXXo) fiei^6vco<; 13 Toi' TToXefiov rovSe hioiaovaL. (^iXovai yap ol T(ov hvdKoXwv diraXXaaaoiJLevoi tmv ovttco heSva- tv')(iik6tcov dfieivovf; del Ta? yv(i)^a<; elvai'* Napcr?}? fiev roaavra elTre. 14 '^TpaTL(t)Tr)<; Be Tt? ef ^AptfiLvov XaOcov t(x)v ^ap/3dp(ov rr)v (pvXaKtjv^ e<? re rb (rrparoTreSov r)X6e Kal ^eXiaapiw ypdfxp.ara ehet^ev a tt/^o? 15 avrov ^l(odvvr)(; eypa^frev. ihtjXov he r) ypacprj rdhe' ""Airavra r)^d<; rd eTnrrjheia y^povov ttoX- Xov eiTiXeXoLTTevai Kal rb XoLirbv fiijre tt/jo? rbv hrjpiov dvreyeiv rifxd<; lcfOl /xtjre rov<i €7n6vra<i dfjLvvecrOaL o'lov<; re elvai, dXX! eirrd rj/xepMV aKOV- aLov<; rjfjLa^ re avrov^ Kal irbXiv rrjvhe rol<; iro- ^ i/jLTreiTTccKaaiy K : iKireTrrcoKaaiP L. ' rwu fiap^apuv t^v <pvXaKi]v K : tovs ^ap$apovs L 6 HISTORY OF THE WARS, VI. xvi. 9-15 him to the enemy. But see that you do not exact from the emperor and from us the penalty for mistakes committed by John through ignorance. For if the Goths capture Ariminum at the present juncture^ it will be their good fortune to have made captive a capable Roman general^ as well as a whole army and a city subject to the emperor. And the calamity will not stop witn this, Due it will also have such weight as to determine the fortune of the war in every field. For you should reason thus regarding the enemy, that they are still, even at the present time, far superior to us in the number of their soldiers, and they have lost their courage only because of the many reverses they have suffered. And this is natural ; for the adversity of fortune has taken away all their confidence. If, therefore, they meet with success at the present time, they will at no distant date recover their spirit and thereafter they will carry on this war with a boldness, not merely equal to ours, but actually much greater. For it is a way with tliose who are freeing themselves from a difficult situation always to have a better heart than those who have not yet met with disaster." Thus spoke Narses. At this time a soldier who had escaped from Ariminum by slipping through the guard of the barbarians came into the camp and shewed Belisarius a letter which John had written to him, conveying '' the following message : Know that for a long time all our provisions have been exhausted, that we are no longer able either to hold out against the populace or to ward off our assailants, and that within seven days we shall unwillingly surrender both ourselves 7 PROCOPIUS OF CAESAREA 16 X€/iLOi<; €y)(€ipi€LU' Trepairepo) yap /Sia^eaOai rrjv Trapouaav avdyKTjv ijKtara 6')(^0fiev, ^virep airoko- yelaOat vrrep rj/xayv, rjv ri ovk €vrrpe7re<i Bpdaco/iev, 17 d^L6)(pe(i)v ol/iac.^' 'lcodpvr)<; /jlep eypayjrev a)Be.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Story of the Byzantine Empire
    THE STO RY O F T HE NATIO NS L LU T T E E R VO L . I z M o I S A . P , R D , T H E E AR L I E R VO L UM E S A R E f I N E F R E E B P o AS A . SO T H STO R Y O G E C . y r . I . HARR R F R E B TH U ILM A N T HE STO Y O O M . y A R R G EW B P f A K O S E R F T HE S . o S . M T HE ST O Y O J y r . J . H R B Z N R O F DE . A R A coz I T HE ST O Y C HA L A . y . — R F E R N . B S B ING O U L THE ST O Y O G MA Y y . AR G D F N W B P f H B YE S E N o . H . O T HE ST O R Y O O R A Y . y r N E n E B . E . a d S SA H T HE ST O R Y O F SP A I . y U N AL N B P R of. A . VAM B Y T HE STO R Y O F H U GA R Y . y r E ST R O F E B P of L E TH E O Y C A RT H A G .
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Roman Memory in the Age of Justinian DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the D
    The Politics of Roman Memory in the Age of Justinian DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Marion Woodrow Kruse, III Graduate Program in Greek and Latin The Ohio State University 2015 Dissertation Committee: Anthony Kaldellis, Advisor; Benjamin Acosta-Hughes; Nathan Rosenstein Copyright by Marion Woodrow Kruse, III 2015 ABSTRACT This dissertation explores the use of Roman historical memory from the late fifth century through the middle of the sixth century AD. The collapse of Roman government in the western Roman empire in the late fifth century inspired a crisis of identity and political messaging in the eastern Roman empire of the same period. I argue that the Romans of the eastern empire, in particular those who lived in Constantinople and worked in or around the imperial administration, responded to the challenge posed by the loss of Rome by rewriting the history of the Roman empire. The new historical narratives that arose during this period were initially concerned with Roman identity and fixated on urban space (in particular the cities of Rome and Constantinople) and Roman mythistory. By the sixth century, however, the debate over Roman history had begun to infuse all levels of Roman political discourse and became a major component of the emperor Justinian’s imperial messaging and propaganda, especially in his Novels. The imperial history proposed by the Novels was aggressivley challenged by other writers of the period, creating a clear historical and political conflict over the role and import of Roman history as a model or justification for Roman politics in the sixth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Profile of a Plant: the Olive in Early Medieval Italy, 400-900 CE By
    Profile of a Plant: The Olive in Early Medieval Italy, 400-900 CE by Benjamin Jon Graham A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) in the University of Michigan 2014 Doctoral Committee: Professor Paolo Squatriti, Chair Associate Professor Diane Owen Hughes Professor Richard P. Tucker Professor Raymond H. Van Dam © Benjamin J. Graham, 2014 Acknowledgements Planting an olive tree is an act of faith. A cultivator must patiently protect, water, and till the soil around the plant for fifteen years before it begins to bear fruit. Though this dissertation is not nearly as useful or palatable as the olive’s pressed fruits, its slow growth to completion resembles the tree in as much as it was the patient and diligent kindness of my friends, mentors, and family that enabled me to finish the project. Mercifully it took fewer than fifteen years. My deepest thanks go to Paolo Squatriti, who provoked and inspired me to write an unconventional dissertation. I am unable to articulate the ways he has influenced my scholarship, teaching, and life. Ray Van Dam’s clarity of thought helped to shape and rein in my run-away ideas. Diane Hughes unfailingly saw the big picture—how the story of the olive connected to different strands of history. These three people in particular made graduate school a humane and deeply edifying experience. Joining them for the dissertation defense was Richard Tucker, whose capacious understanding of the history of the environment improved this work immensely. In addition to these, I would like to thank David Akin, Hussein Fancy, Tom Green, Alison Cornish, Kathleen King, Lorna Alstetter, Diana Denney, Terre Fisher, Liz Kamali, Jon Farr, Yanay Israeli, and Noah Blan, all at the University of Michigan, for their benevolence.
    [Show full text]
  • Journeys to Byzantium? Roman Senators Between Rome and Constantinople
    Journeys to Byzantium? Roman Senators Between Rome and Constantinople Master’s Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Michael Anthony Carrozzo, B.A Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2010 Thesis Committee: Kristina Sessa, Advisor Timothy Gregory Anthony Kaldellis Copyright by Michael Anthony Carrozzo 2010 Abstract For over a thousand years, the members of the Roman senatorial aristocracy played a pivotal role in the political and social life of the Roman state. Despite being eclipsed by the power of the emperors in the first century BC, the men who made up this order continued to act as the keepers of Roman civilization for the next four hundred years, maintaining their traditions even beyond the disappearance of an emperor in the West. Despite their longevity, the members of the senatorial aristocracy faced an existential crisis following the Ostrogothic conquest of the Italian peninsula, when the forces of the Byzantine emperor Justinian I invaded their homeland to contest its ownership. Considering the role they played in the later Roman Empire, the disappearance of the Roman senatorial aristocracy following this conflict is a seminal event in the history of Italy and Western Europe, as well as Late Antiquity. Two explanations have been offered to explain the subsequent disappearance of the Roman senatorial aristocracy. The first involves a series of migrations, beginning before the Gothic War, from Italy to Constantinople, in which members of this body abandoned their homes and settled in the eastern capital.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOGRAPHY WORKBOOK for GRADES 7-12 Belisarius
    BELISARIUS BIOGRAPHY WORKBOOK FOR GRADES 7-12 Belisarius BELISARIUS (505-565 C.E.) Few men have performed Emperor Justinian, was an equally greater achievements than this remarkable personage, capable of general, to whom it was given to be conceiving and accomplishing conqueror again and again over magnificent designs, yet withal of a nations hitherto invincible, and to mean, ungenerous, ungrateful arrest, during his own lifetime, the character. Justinian was responsible disintegration of the Roman Empire. for the codification (under He lived in the early part of the sixth Christianized conditions) of the old century of the Christian era, though Roman law (known as the Justinian the date of his birth is not certainly Code), so as to serve as the foundation known, and he was in the prime of life of jurisprudence to all the European about 530. Belisarius is believed to nations except the English; the have been the son of a peasant of building of the church of St. Sophia Thrace, probably of Slavonian descent, (Hagia Sophia); and the rolling back as his name, stripped of its classical for a time the flood that on all sides form, would belong to that language was overwhelming the ancient Empire and would be Beli-than, or the White of Rome, were all due to this prince. Prince. 2. Who ruled as emperor of the 1. Describe Belisarius’ father. Eastern Roman (Byzantine) ____________________________________ Empire during the life of ____________________________________ Belisarius? ____________________________________ ____________________________________ ____________________________________ ____________________________________ ____________________________________ ____________________________________ ____________________________________ For the last two centuries, the Apparently he began life as a Eastern and the Western Roman common soldier, and gradually rose by empires had been separated, though courage and ability.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Defeat the Vandals in Combat 115
    How to Defeat the Vandals in Combat 115 Chapter 3 How to Defeat the Vandals in Combat Unlike some aspects of Roman North Africa in late antiquity, such as Saint Augustine, and Egypt, the Vandal Wars and the reconquest are subjects that have attracted limited attention.1 Again, Procopius is the principal source for most of what he describes,2 and most narrative accounts merely follow his lead.3 The war itself marks the beginning of Justinian’s campaigns of recon- quest; it also contributed significantly to the fame of Belisarius. This chapter is divided into the same three sections as the previous chapter, following an his- torical overview. Thus, the first significant section focuses on the literary qualities of Procopius’ descriptions of combat in the Vandal Wars, and in the process we delve deeper into select aspects of modern narrative theory, at least where relevant. Topics include the role of narrative order, the role of the narra- tor, the use of narrative markers like names and numbers, and some of the ways that the combats fit into the larger narrative. The principal emphasis of this section is on exploring some of the ways that Procopius, the implied author, attempts to guide readers in the Vandal Wars. In other words, we look at the ways that Procopius, more here than in the Persian Wars, leads his read- ers and listeners towards the particular lessons that he is expounding. In the third section, on explaining combat, we look at the different character of much of the combat (the increase in asymmetric combat), the different factors that shaped its outcome from morale (much more prominent in the Vandal Wars 1 There has been a fair amount of work on Corippus, on whom see the works of Cameron (1996a: 12–25; 1996b: 167–180), Zarini (1997, esp.
    [Show full text]
  • Jordanes and the Invention of Roman-Gothic History Dissertation
    Empire of Hope and Tragedy: Jordanes and the Invention of Roman-Gothic History Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Brian Swain Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2014 Dissertation Committee: Timothy Gregory, Co-advisor Anthony Kaldellis Kristina Sessa, Co-advisor Copyright by Brian Swain 2014 Abstract This dissertation explores the intersection of political and ethnic conflict during the emperor Justinian’s wars of reconquest through the figure and texts of Jordanes, the earliest barbarian voice to survive antiquity. Jordanes was ethnically Gothic - and yet he also claimed a Roman identity. Writing from Constantinople in 551, he penned two Latin histories on the Gothic and Roman pasts respectively. Crucially, Jordanes wrote while Goths and Romans clashed in the imperial war to reclaim the Italian homeland that had been under Gothic rule since 493. That a Roman Goth wrote about Goths while Rome was at war with Goths is significant and has no analogue in the ancient record. I argue that it was precisely this conflict which prompted Jordanes’ historical inquiry. Jordanes, though, has long been considered a mere copyist, and seldom treated as an historian with ideas of his own. And the few scholars who have treated Jordanes as an original author have dampened the significance of his Gothicness by arguing that barbarian ethnicities were evanescent and subsumed by the gravity of a Roman political identity. They hold that Jordanes was simply a Roman who can tell us only about Roman things, and supported the Roman emperor in his war against the Goths.
    [Show full text]
  • Procopius, with an English Translation by H.B. Dewing
    THE LOEB CLASSICAL LIBRARY FOCTNDED BY JAMES LOEB, LL.D. EDITED BY fT. E. PAGE, C.H., LITTJ). tE. CAPPS, PH.D., ix.D. tW. H. D. ROUSE, litt.d. L. A. POST, L.H.D. E. H. WARMIXGTON, m.a., f.b.hist.soc. PROCOPIUS V PROCOPIUS WITH AN ENGLISH TRANSLATION BY H. B. DEWING rRESIDENT, ATHENS COLLKGE, GRIBCK IN SEVEN VOLUMES V HISTORY OF THE WARS, BOOKS VII {continued) and VIII LONDON WILLIAM HEINEMANN LTD CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS MCMLXII First printed 1928 Reprinted 1954, 1962 Printed in Great Britain CONTENTS VAOB HISTORY OF THE WARS— VII. —TH« GOTHIC WAR (^continued) 1 VIII. —THE GOTHIC WAR {continued) 149 INDEX 421 I : PROCOPIUS OF CAESAREA HISTORY OF THE VV^ARS BOOK VII THE GOTHIC WAR {continued) nPOKOniOY KAI2APEn2 TDEP TON nOAEMON AOFOS EBAOMOS XXXVI Mera 8e TovTi.\a<i airav eVi 'Pdofirjv to arpd- Tevfia Tjye, koI ey/^aOe^ofievoi; eh iroXiopKLav Kadiararo. irvyx^^^ ^^ YieXccrdpio^ Tpi<T^iXiov<; dpiaTivhrjv diroXe^dfievo^;, ovairep eVt tw 'Pay/irj^i (fivXaKTTjpca) fcaraa-Trjad/xei^o^ ^loyevjjv avToh dpxovTu, TMv 8opv(f)6p(i)i^ Tbiv avTov evu, eire- arrjcrev, dvSpa ^vverov re 8ia(j)€p6vTQ)<; koL dyaOov 2 rd TToXifiia. 8i6 Brj ^Popov nrjKO<i rrj npoa-eSpeia ravTrj erpi^ero. o'i re yap 7ro\iopKovp.evoi dpe- T?}? irepLOvaia tt/oo? diravra rov T6t6(ov (TTparov d^iofiaxot oWe? i(f)aivovTo nal Aioyeirrj'; e<? re to uKpiffe^ rfi (f>v\aKf] i-xpfJTo to? /xi] T19 KUKOvp- yrjacov iirl to Tet^o? toi ^ Koi iravTa'x^odi Trj<i TToXetw? aiTOu €VTo<i Tov 'irepLJ36\ov (nreipa^ evhelv 3 (T<f)iai rd eTrt,Ti]8eia (w? rjKia-ra eVotet.
    [Show full text]
  • Procopius's Sibyl — the Fall of Vitigis and the Ostrogoths
    Graeco-Latina Brunensia 24 / 2019 / 2 https://doi.org/10.5817/GLB2019-2-8 Procopius’s Sibyl — The Fall of Vitigis and the Ostrogoths Tamás Kovács (University of Szeged) Abstract The monumental work of Procopius on Justinian’s wars includes two Sibylline oracles. As is of- ČLÁNKY / ARTICLES ten the case, the oracles are ambiguous; however, it is precisely this feature that helps to reveal their real meaning. As a consequence, the oracles can also aid researchers in understanding the basis of Byzantine political thought. This essay discusses the connotations of the Sibylline oracle in 537 through classical text analysis, revealing that Procopius used archaic ethnonyms and royal titles to draw a parallel between the fall of the Kingdom of Lydia and the Ostrogothic Kingdom. Using this framework, Procopius stresses that in 410, Alaric committed the original crime by abducting Galla Placidia; however, Vitigis and his wife Matasuntha were the ones who atoned for this sin in 540. Keywords Gothic war; Procopius of Caesarea; Sibyl; Vitigis; Matasuntha 113 Tamás Kovács Procopius’s Sibyl — The Fall of Vitigis and the Ostrogoths The first phase of the Gothic War began promisingly in 535. Belisarius captured Sicily within a year, then moved further into Italy the following spring and made his way to- wards Naples without encountering any significant resistance. Naples fell within a month, which caused disarray between the Goths. Enraged with the inactivity of Theodahad, they gathered in council and elected Vitigis. The followers of the new king killed Theo- dahad, while Vitigis headed to Ravenna in order to unify his forces.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Defeat the Goths in Combat
    158 Chapter 4 Chapter 4 How to Defeat the Goths in Combat The Gothic Wars is one of the most contentious parts of the Wars as a whole. Firstly, either the Thucydidean parallels are most suspect here, or, the intertex- tual elements are most insightful. Secondly, the war that it describes is one of the most controversial aspects of the age of Justinian. Although this book is not explicitly focused on the historical reality, apart from the intellectual cli- mate that emerges from a study of descriptions of combat in a traditional historical genre, with this section of the Wars more than any other we are con- fronted with reality head on. On the one hand, a look at Malalas’ Chronograph, or Evagrius’ Ecclesiastical History, seems to confirm the arguments put forth by Kouroumali1 and Scott,2 among others, that the wars with the Goths were peripheral to Justinian’s frontier policy, behind Persia,3 the Balkans,4 and even North Africa.5 On the other hand, Procopius devotes more pages to the war in Italy than he does to any other frontier.6 The textual reality is thus in stark con- trast to the presumed historical reality. Even some of Procopius’ numbers seem to support the argument for unimportance, for the small number of troops quoted in relation to the overall Byzantine forces does suggest, at least if we take them at face value, that the importance of the campaign was minimized by Justinian.7 Yet, Roman expeditionary armies in the sixth century were never 1 Kouroumali 2005. 2 Scott 1985.
    [Show full text]
  • The Andreios Eunuch-Commander Narses: Sign of a Decoupling of Martial Virtues and Masculinity in the Early Byzantine Empire?
    The Andreios Eunuch-Commander Narses: Sign of a Decoupling of Martial Virtues and Masculinity in the Early Byzantine Empire? Michael Edward Stewart University of Queensland Abstract: This paper looks at the place of the sixth-century Byzantine general Narses (c. 480–573) in the history of Byzantine gender. Certainly, it has always been important for ancient and modern historians to emphasise Narses’ eunuchism. Indeed, for many modern scholars, Narses’ identity as a castrate has been more important for study than his military deeds and political achievements that proved ephemeral. For some, the presence of a eunuch in such an essential military role indicates a turning away from codes of generalship based on traditional martial courage and manliness. This paper questions such a view, suggesting that Byzantium had a much more flexible notion of eunuchs’ gender status than some recent scholarship allows. Indeed, it suggests that Narses fits into a continuing hegemony of traditional masculine values based on the supremacy of Byzantine men’s martial virtues The sixth-century Byzantine general Narses (c. 480–573) has long earned historians’ respect.1 He deserves this acclaim since his major victories over the Goths in 552 and versus the Franks and Alamanni in 554 helped to secure the Emperor Justinian I’s (ruled 527–565) retaking of Italy from the Goths after an arduous nineteen-year struggle.2 So too did Narses perform admirably for twelve years in his role as prefect 1 Michael Edward Stewart, ‘The Andreios Eunuch Commander Narses’ of Italy. Of course, it has always been important to emphasise that Narses was a eunuch.
    [Show full text]
  • Overwhelmed by Immigrants
    HISTORYHISTORY — PAST AND PERSPECTIVE Overwhelmed by Immigrants No turning back: Migrating Goths cross a river en route to safety within Roman borders. Once The fall of the Western the fateful decision had been made to open the floo dgates of uncontrolled immigration from the Roman Empire was East, the Roman Empire was living on borrowed time. precipitated by of human history, a conflict that ran its itary and guaranteeing the supremacy of course quickly in the hot, parched coun- the Goths in the eastern portions of the immigrants — who had tryside, and left tens of thousands of men empire ever after. Within a generation, the fled to Roman protection most of them the flower of the Eastern Goths, emboldened and battle-hardened, Roman imperial military, including the would arrive at the gates of the Eternal from the Huns — when Roman emperor himself dead on the City itself, and become the first foreign the newcomers refused to field, while the comparatively small army power in eight centuries to sack Rome. of Goths and Alans rode triumphantly And all of it began because of an im- follow Roman laws. over the terrain, giving no quarter to the migration crisis. wounded and dying, slaying officer and by Charles Scaliger foot soldier alike. By late day, the field Charitable Notions belonged to the carrion fowl and blow- By the middle of the fourth century A.D., he late afternoon of August 9, 378 flies, already commencing their grim work German tribes were settled all along the A.D. was brutally hot in the fields among the heaps of corpses.
    [Show full text]