DOCSLIB.ORG

• P)T, Ne/Wile/Ne,, >1G

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
• P)T, Ne/Wile/Ne,, >1G • • p)t, Ne/wile/ne,, >1g , Summer, 1989 Volume 12. No. 2 REPATRIATION PROGRAM FINALLY TO BEGIN The return to Namibia of more than 50,000 refugees, originally scheduled to begin by May 15th, is finally slated to start on June 12th . This repatriation has been "on hold" for several weeks, putting in jeopardy the timetable for the holding of elections which are to lead to Namibian independence. The decision to delay the return of Namibian refugees had been made by the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, apparently with the approval of the "Three R Committee," for several reasons. First, the continued campaign of harassment and in- timidation of civilians in the north, led the Commis- sioner to conclude that it "would be unwise to at- tempt to resettle refugees in an atmosphere of terror." A second problem was the continuing delay in the revocation of racist and discriminatory laws . Accor- ding to UN Resolution 435, all such laws were to be off the books before the resettlement process began. The South African appointed Administrator General had refused to comply. Other stumbling blocks, erected by South Africa, in- clude a qualifying of the " blanket amnesty" that had been promised returning refugees, the proposal that Namibian children look forward in hope. Will the dream of in- refugees must produce proof of citizenship, the in- dependence become a reality? sistence that South Africa officials be involved in the processing of refugees, including, perhaps, requiring medical examinations for everyone. On June 6th, in the face of a growing impatience, and a concern that the entire peace process would col- This Issue. lapse, agreement was announced between the UN Special Representative, Martti Ahtisaari and the South • Monitoring the Road to African appointed Administrator General, Louis Pinaar. Freedom : Special Report #2 Limited repeal of racial laws promised • Repatriation Process Begins Some, but not all, of the discriminatory laws will be • Attempted Assassinations of repealed . Specifically revoked are AG 9, AG 27 and Church Leader and Photographer the infamous Terrorism Act, all of which provided for the indefinite and indescriminate detention of Nami- • Koevoet Terrorism Continues in bians. In addition, other laws which prevented public Guise of South West Africa Police gatherings and hindered the formation of opposition • Action Alert - Stop Aid to Unita movements were to be scrapped. (continued on page 3) EA/TM/id "THOSE WHO WEEP AS THEY GO OUT . .. WILL COME BACK SINGING FOR JOY ." It is difficult to imagine the deep emotions that must fill the hearts of our Namibian friends during these days of "homecoming ." Joy, certainly! "The kids are coming home!" was already the cry back on April 1st, when the homecom- ing became only another tragic massacre . But this time the return is to be duly monitored . The UN will be there, along with moms and dads and wives and families! Personal happiness will be coupled with national re- joicing. Planeloads of returning Namibians will be the most tangible sign yet that independence is really coming! Psalm 126 Paraphrased by But in the hearts of Namibians, there must also be feel- Pastor Zephania Kameeta ings of uncertainty, and apprehension, and sadness. When the day comes on which our victory What will the returnee be like? How will family relation- will shine like a torch in the night, ships be rebuilt? Certainly the child who fled into the it will be like a dream. bush at age 13, who has been raised in refugee camps We will laugh and sing for joy. and foreign countries, and who now returns as a Then the other nations will say about us, young adult of 24, will not be the same as was "The Lord did great things for them." remembered, as was imagined, all these years . There Indeed, he is doing great things for us; will have been many changes. Babies have been born that is why we are happy in our suffering. in exile, other people have died, without ever seeing their country again. Lord, break the chains of humiliation and death just as on that glorious morning And how to provide homes and jobs and education when you were raised. for the returning exiles?? Already ' Namibians are being Let those who weep as they sow the seeds asked to open their homes and their hearts, to share of justice and freedom, what little they have so that those who are coming gather the harvest of peace and reconciliation. home will feel welcome. Those who weep as they go out as instruments The "long walk to freedom is not over ." The struggle to of your love build a new nation is just beginning . As is apparent will come back singing with joy, from other stories in this Newsletter, South Africa will as they will witness the disappearance of hate not withdraw graciously . The Namibians will have to and the manifestation of your love in your world. reclaim their country, issue by issue, inch by inch. NAMIBIA NEWSLETTER is published quarterly by National So let us share in their rejoicing! Let us sing hymns of Namibia Concerns (NNC), with funding from the United praise for the return of their loved ones. But let us also Nations Council for Namibia. recommit ourselves to the task . Let us use our energies National Namibia Concerns : Namibia Concerns 915 East 9th Avenue 333 Wartburg Place and resources to help them build a nation where Denver, Colorado 80218 Dubuque, Iowa 52001 justice and freedom reign! (303) 830-2774 (319) 589-0326 FAX (303) 830-2414 FAX (319) 589-0333 National Namibia Concerns is an education/advocacy network working with the Namibian churches for a just independence for the people of Namibia. Executive Director : Solveig Kjeseth, Denver, CO Associate Director : Susan Burchfield, Denver, CO Midwest Coordinator: Ilah Weiblen, Dubuque, IA NNC Board President: Barbara Fullerton, Columbus, OH 2 (continued from page 1) flvkae Neto%:t,e:t.4, Unfortunately left untouched was AG 8, which pro- vides for racially determined "ethnic" administrations under the South African imposed governmental system. Only a month ago, UN spokesman, Cedric Thornberry, had stated that "AG 8 is based entirely on racially discriminatory principles . is unacceptable and must go before the first returnees are repatriated." REPATRIATION Now, however, the UN has compromised, announcing RESETTLEMENT that they would accept the limited repeal of discriminatory laws that directly affected the election RECONSTRUCTION process and leave it to an independent Namibian legislature to "clean up" the rest. "THREE R COMMITTEE" TO A significant element, however, is that the political COORDINATE RESETTLEMENT base for the South African backed DTA party (the Certainly some of the busiest people in Namibia these main opposition to SWAPO) lies in these "ethnic ad- days are members and staff of the "Three R Commit- ministrations." Leaving them intact is a thinly disguised tee!" Charged by the UN High Commissioner for setback for SWAPO. Refugees, with the task of "Repatriation, Resettlement and Reconstruction" for 50,000 to 70,000 refugees Long-awaited amnesty promised is a committee formed by the member churches of In addition to the repeal of discriminatory laws, the the Council of Churches in Namibia (CCN). Administrator General agreed to abide by a 1979 agreement with the UN High Commissioner for Functioning as the indigenous partner of the UN, the Refugees that returning exiles would be granted a RRR-Committee is to provide suitable reception blanket amnesty. centers, arrange temporary living accommodations, provide medical care, food, and clothing, and meet Responding to this news, Lutheran Bishop Kleopas educational and spiritual needs for the returning Dumeni said "The issuing of the amnesty is good news, refugees. .a formidable task, indeed. but what we need now is to see the amnesty in prac- tice-to see our sons and daughters arrive peacefully." But Immanuel Dumeni, Coordinator of the Programme, . "Our confidence was boosted," is encouraged (For Bishop Dumeni and his wife, Aino, the return of ex- Dumeni says, "by the positive response of the iles will bring a special joy. Their oldest child, Josiah, churches and the people of Namibia . The immediate disappeared at the time of the Kassinga massacre in offerings of services and money boosted our morale. 1978. It was a year before he could get word to his The success of RRR lies in the Namibian people as a grieving family that he had not been killed. So the whole, not in the hands of a few RRR officers or com- Dumeni's share personally the hope of a safe return mittee members. It is clear that we are involved in a for the exiles .) nationwide program that has impressive backing from the Namibian people." Massive "airlift" planned Namibians will enter the country via several entry Returning refugees will be flown into Namibia at a rate points: refugees will be flown in at Windhoek, Groot- of 1400 per day, six days a week, for six weeks, an fontein and Ondangwa . They will come by truck to undertaking that will strain the energies and facilities Ruacana, Oshikango, Rundu and Katima Mulilo, all of the Three R Committee and the welcoming points along the northern border. From these entry churches. points they will go to various church centers where they will remain until they can be permanently re- settled. NEW ADDRESS FOR COUNCIL OF CHUCHES Among the returnees will be 15,000 children, 3,000 of whom are under 11 years of age . Three locations The Council of Churches in Namibia (CCN) has have been identified as special centers where moved to new offices in Katatura . Their address is: children will remain for up to twelve months . Plans are 8521 Mashego Street being made to provide for their schooling with as little Katatura 9000 interruption as possible .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report: Volume 2
    VOLUME TWO Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report The report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was presented to President Nelson Mandela on 29 October 1998. Archbishop Desmond Tutu Ms Hlengiwe Mkhize Chairperson Dr Alex Boraine Mr Dumisa Ntsebeza Vice-Chairperson Ms Mary Burton Dr Wendy Orr Revd Bongani Finca Adv Denzil Potgieter Ms Sisi Khampepe Dr Fazel Randera Mr Richard Lyster Ms Yasmin Sooka Mr Wynand Malan* Ms Glenda Wildschut Dr Khoza Mgojo * Subject to minority position. See volume 5. Chief Executive Officer: Dr Biki Minyuku I CONTENTS Chapter 1 Chapter 6 National Overview .......................................... 1 Special Investigation The Death of President Samora Machel ................................................ 488 Chapter 2 The State outside Special Investigation South Africa (1960-1990).......................... 42 Helderberg Crash ........................................... 497 Special Investigation Chemical and Biological Warfare........ 504 Chapter 3 The State inside South Africa (1960-1990).......................... 165 Special Investigation Appendix: State Security Forces: Directory Secret State Funding................................... 518 of Organisations and Structures........................ 313 Special Investigation Exhumations....................................................... 537 Chapter 4 The Liberation Movements from 1960 to 1990 ..................................................... 325 Special Investigation Appendix: Organisational structures and The Mandela United
    [Show full text]
  • The Cassinga Massacre of Namibian Exiles in 1978 and the Conflicts Between Survivors’ Memories and Testimonies
    ENDURING SUFFERING: THE CASSINGA MASSACRE OF NAMIBIAN EXILES IN 1978 AND THE CONFLICTS BETWEEN SURVIVORS’ MEMORIES AND TESTIMONIES BY VILHO AMUKWAYA SHIGWEDHA A Dissertation submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History University of the Western Cape December 2011 Supervisor: Professor Patricia Hayes ABSTRACT During the peak of apartheid, the South African Defence Force (SADF) killed close to a thousand Namibian exiles at Cassinga in southern Angola. This happened on May 4 1978. In recent years, Namibia commemorates this day, nationwide, in remembrance of those killed and disappeared following the Cassinga attack. During each Cassinga anniversary, survivors are modelled into „living testimonies‟ of the Cassinga massacre. Customarily, at every occasion marking this event, a survivor is delegated to unpack, on behalf of other survivors, „memories of Cassinga‟ so that the inexperienced audience understands what happened on that day. Besides survivors‟ testimonies, edited video footage showing, among others, wrecks in the camp, wounded victims laying in hospital beds, an open mass grave with dead bodies, SADF paratroopers purportedly marching in Cassinga is also screened for the audience to witness the agony of that day. Interestingly, the way such presentations are constructed draw challenging questions. For example, how can the visual and oral presentations of the Cassinga violence epitomize actual memories of the Cassinga massacre? How is it possible that such presentations can generate a sense of remembrance against forgetfulness of those who did not experience that traumatic event? When I interviewed a number of survivors (2007 - 2010), they saw no analogy between testimony (visual or oral) and memory. They argued that memory unlike testimony is personal (solid, inexplicable and indescribable).
    [Show full text]
  • The Saga of South African Pows in Angola, 1975-82
    102 THE SAGA OF SOUTH AFRICAN POWS IN ANGOLA, 1975–82 Gary Baines History Department, Rhodes University Abstract This article narrates the story of nine soldiers captured during and shortly after Operation Savannah, the codename for the South African Defence Force invasion of Angola in 1975–6. Eight of these soldiers were captured in Angola in three separate incidents by Angolan and/or Cuban forces, whereas the last was abducted from northern Namibia by SWAPO (the South West Africa Peoples’ Organisation). The article then provides a chronological account of the sequels to this story that interweaves a number of threads: first, the account relates the South African government’s attempts to suppress press coverage of these stories for fear of the political ‘fall-out’ that the matter might cause amongst the white electorate and in case it jeopardised secret negotiations to secure the release of the prisoners; and second, it uncovers the role played by intermediaries, especially the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), in the sensitive and fraught negotiation process. It will be shown that the South African authorities adopted divergent approaches when dealing with SWAPO and the Angolans/Cubans to secure the release of prisoners of war (POWs). This is because the South African authorities regarded the former as involved in an internal insurrection whereas the latter were members of the military forces of sovereign states. Accordingly, they paid lip service to the Geneva Conventions in the case of Angolan and Cuban POWs but treated captured SWAPO cadres as ‘terrorists’ or ‘criminals’. Introduction Military and diplomatic historians have paid scant attention to the stories of South African Defence Force (SADF) soldiers captured during the war waged in Namibia/Angola.1 Those captured during Operation Savannah (1975–6) warrant a passing mention in a few texts,2 and are Scientia Militaria, South African alluded to in a recently produced documentary Journal of Military Studies, Vol video series.3 Still, the details of their 29 40, Nr 2, 2012, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • UN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE During Its 116Th Session Relating to the Consideration of Second Periodic Report of Namibia
    SPECIAL ALTERNATIVE REPORT AS SUDMITTED TO: UN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE During its 116th Session Relating to the Consideration of Second Periodic Report of Namibia January 25 2016 NamRights Inc, Liberty Center, 116 John Meinert Street, Windhoek-West, P O Box 23592, Namibia, Tel: +264 61 236 183, Fax2Email: +264 88 640 669, Fax: +264 61 234 286, Email1: [email protected]; Email2: [email protected], Web: www.nshr.org.na I. ABOUT NAMRIGHTS INC NamRights Inc (“NamRights”) is a private, independent, non- partisan and non-profit making human rights monitoring and advocacy organization. Founded on December 1 1989 by concerned citizens, the Organization envisages a world free of human rights violations. Its mission is to stop human rights violations in Namibia and the rest of the world. NamRights bases its legal existence on the provisions of Article 21(1) (e) of the Namibian Constitution as well as Article 71 of the UN Charter, read with Economic and Social Council Resolutions 1296 (XLIV) and E/1996/31. The Organization is lawfully registered in terms of Section 21(a) of the Companies Act 1973 (Act 61 of 1973), as amended, as an association incorporated not for gain. African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights of African Union (in 1993) and UN Economic and Social Council (in 1997) recognize NamRights as a bona fide human rights organization truly concerned with matters in their respective competence. The organization can be reached via this address: NamRights Inc Liberty Center 116 John Meinert Street Windhoek-West P. O. Box 23592 Windhoek Namibia Tel: +264 61 236 183/+264 61 253 447/+264 61 238 711 Fax: +264 88 640 669/+264 61 234 286 Mobile: +264 811 406 888 E-mail1: [email protected] E-mail2: [email protected] Web: www.nshr.org.na 2 II.
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia Writers' Bureau
    ASSOCIATION OF CONCERNED AFRICA SCHOLARS Executive Committee Co-Chairpersons Willard R. johnson (MIT) Immanuel Wallerstein (SUNY-Binghamton) Memorandum 11 to Namibia Writers' Bureau Executive Secretary David Groff This first packet on Namibia for the Namibia Writers' Bureau 4205 SE Ramona focuses on a central issue of concern during the last month Portland, OR 97206 (503) 774-2397 about the transition process -- harrassment and intimidation of Namibians by the South African-controlled police, and particu­ Membership larly by former members of the counter-insurgency unit "Koevoet" Ed Ferguson History Department which has been "integrated" into the South West African Police Oregon State University force. You will also find information about the student strike Corvallis, OR 97331 in northern Namibia protesting the actions of Koevoet. In Treasurer addition, I have included information about the voter registra­ Candice Goucher Black Studies Department tion process, which could bias the election against SWAPO. Portland State University Portland, OR 97207 Popular political pressure and international demands to Bulletin Editor resolve the issue of Koevoet are mounting. U.N. Secretary Allan Cooper General Javier Perez de Cuellar is expected to go to Namibia on Political Science Department St. Augustine's College about July 18th; some South African response may be forthcoming Raleigh, NC 27610 at that time. Also, South Africa may wish to reduce interna­ Political Action Comm. tional criticism on this issue before South Africa's National Christine Root Party leader and presidential candidate Frederick W. de Klerk 729 Sunset Ln. East Lansing, MI 48823 comes to the United States at the invitation of Secretary of State Baker, on or about July 26.
    [Show full text]
  • Ceasefire Agreement Between South Africa and Angola-‐Rejection By
    Keesing's Record of World Events (formerly Keesing's Contemporary Archives), Volume 34, September, 1988 Namibia, Page 36132 © 1931-2006 Keesing's Worldwide, LLC - All Rights Reserved. Ceasefire agreement between South Africa and Angola-Rejection by South Africa of draft constitution-Increase in powers of Administrator-General Developments in guerrilla war to mid-1988-Other internal developments-UN activities Signature of ceasefire agreement between Angola and South Africa (Aug. 22, 1988). Submission of draft constitution by constitutional council (July 6, 1987). Talks with South African government (June 19, 1987). Announcement of increase in powers of Administrator-General (April 8, 1988). Arrest of SWAPO leaders and supporters (Aug. 18, 26, 1987). Intervention by President Botha in trial of soldiers accused of murder (March 22, 1988). Deaths in bank explosion at Oshakati (Feb. 19, 1988). Schools boycott (March-June 1988). Strike by mineworkers (July-August 1987). UN security Council resolution (Oct. 30, 1987). Progress appeared to be made on reaching a political solution to the conflict in southern Angola and Namibia after the fourth in a series of negotiating sessions, held in Geneva in early August 1988, involving representatives of the Angolan, South African, Cuban and United States governments 80 for earlier meetings [see pages 36079-80 for earlier meetings]. The Angolan and South African governments on Aug. 22, 1988, signed formally at Ruacana, near the Angola-Namibia border, an agreement announced jointly by Angola, Cuba and South Africa two weeks earlier, covering southern Angola, where since late 1987 fighting had intensified into a major confrontation between on the one hand Angolan armed forces backed by Cuban troops, and on the other the South African Defence Forces (SADF), fighting in support of the Angolan rebel organization Uniao Nacional para Independencia Total de Angola UNITA [see page 35750; 35174 A; 36076 A; for reports of UNITA activity December 1985-April 1988].
    [Show full text]
  • The Namibian Border War: an Appraisal of the South African Strategy
    Scientia Militaria, South African Journal of Military Studies, Vol 34, Nr 1, 2006. doi: 10.5787/34-1-15 19 THE NAMIBIAN BORDER WAR: AN APPRAISAL OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN STRATEGY Dr Leopold Scholtz1 Extraordinary Professor, Department of History, Stellenbosch University Introduction From the sixties to the late eighties, the border war became a household term in South Africa. Hundreds of thousands of young white men were called up for military service, and many served in some or other capacity in Namibia – then South West Africa – often in the so-called operational area, often as combat troops. These young men were told that they were there to fight communism and that Swapo (the South West African People’s Organisation), the enemy, had to be bested for peace and freedom to come to the southern African subcontinent. Nevertheless, when the UN-supervised elections came after years of international wrangling, Swapo won handsomely, obtaining 57 per cent of the votes. The South African Government and South African Defence Force (SADF) was taken aback, because they really had believed that the anti-Swapo coalition would get a majority.2 The question therefore is: How was this possible? Did the South Africans, who developed a sophisticated strategy to counter-revolutionary guerrilla warfare and really were convinced that they had Swapo on the run, make mistakes they were not aware of? Did they disobey in practice the rules they supported in theory? It will be the purpose of this analysis to answer this question. Principles In order to do this, we will have to start with a short analysis of the accepted principles of revolutionary guerrilla warfare, as they developed during the 20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Report
    Copyright 8 August 1992 by Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 92-72844 ISBN: 1-56432-077-4 Africa Watch was established in 1988 to monitor and promote observance of internationally recognized human rights in Africa. Africa Watch is a division of Human Rights Watch. The chair of Africa Watch is William Carmichael and the vice chair is Alice Brown. Rakiya Omaar is the executive director; Alex de Waal is the associate director; Janet Fleischman and Karen Sorensen are research associates; Barbara Baker, Urmi Shah and Ben Penglase are associates. Human Rights Watch is composed of Africa Watch, Americas Watch, Asia Watch, Helsinki Watch and Middle East Watch, and the Fund for Free Expression. The executive committee is comprised of Robert L. Bernstein, chair; Adrian DeWind, vice chair; Roland Algrant, Lisa Anderson, Peter Bell, Alice Brown, William Carmichael, Dorothy Cullman, Irene Diamond, Jonathan Fanton, Jack Greenberg, Alice H. Henkin, Stephen Kass, Marina Kaufman, Jeri Laber, Aryeh Neier, Bruce Rabb, Kenneth Roth, Orville Schell, Garry Sick, and Robert Wedgeworth. The staff includes Aryeh Neier, executive director; Kenneth Roth, deputy director; Holly J. Burkhalter, Washington director; Ellen Lutz, California director; Susan Osnos, press director; Jemera Rone, counsel; Joanna Weschler, Prison Project director; Dorothy Q. Thomas, Women's Rights Project director; and Allyson Collins, research associate. Executive Directors Africa Watch Americas Watch Asia
    [Show full text]
  • Bush Tracking and Warfare in Late Twentieth-Century East and Southern Africa
    Historia 59, 2, November 2014, pp 229-251 Bush tracking and warfare in late twentieth-century east and southern Africa Tim Stapleton* Introduction Tracking is the ability to pursue and close with an animal or human by following signs, commonly called spoor which is an Afrikaans word, left behind in the environment. These include footprints, disturbed vegetation, evidence of feeding, biological waste, sounds and smells. Experienced trackers use the appearance of these signs to determine the direction of their subject’s movement and the approximate age of spoor which indicates how far ahead in time and space the subject is. Tracking requires a thorough familiarity of the geography, climate and ecology of a specific locale. It also involves a great deal of informed speculation that allows a tracker who loses a trail to imagine the most likely path of the subject and attempt to pick up further signs in that direction. Anthropologists tell us that tracking was crucial in the evolution of early humans as part of persistence hunting; man’s ability to regulate body temperature by sweating and to hydrate by carrying water, which allowed him to run down animal prey.1 The literature on tracking consists of some books advocating its practise as a form of therapy for modern people to re-establish connection with the natural environment and others that represent technical “how to” manuals for hunting animals and/or humans some of which are military or law enforcement oriented.2 During Africa’s late twentieth century decolonisation wars, tracking became an important skill mobilised by both state security forces and insurgents.
    [Show full text]
  • Oorlog/Border War 1966-1989, Special Edition of Journal For
    Journal of Namibian Studies, 2 (2007): 123–128 ISSN: 1863-5954 Review: Leo Barnard, (ed.), Grens- The rationale underlying most articles oorlog/Border War 1966-1989, Special clearly seems to be to highlight the edition of Journal for Contemporary military’s role as a disciplined, efficient History, volume 31, number 3, organisation that performed its role as a December 2006, University of Free frontline defender of the ‘people’ State. against the ‘forces of revolutionary communism’. The basic premise from which this publication operates is to This special edition of the Journal of contrast the implicitly sordid world of Contemporary History, titled Border diplomacy and politics with the work of War/Grensoorlog, sets out to cover the the military, clearly seen to be SA side of the war, in particular the role, occupying the moral high ground in the operations, tactics and strategy of the conflicts that raged in southern Africa South African Defence Force (SADF). until 1989. Border War/Grensoorlog, The editorial states that it represents an represents a spirited defense of the “honest attempt to provide a few SADF, not only of its war-time tactics insights into a topic that was regarded and strategy, but also of its ultimate as taboo for many decades” (preface). aims. Interesting perspectives are It can also “serve as a resource offered about military tactics, opera- publication, which may hopefully be tional shortcomings, military successes utilised as a guideline to clear up any and setbacks and the morale of people ambiguities and stimulate further involved on the SA side. What is lacking research”(ibid).
    [Show full text]
  • Special Operations K Unit of the South African Security Police (Koevoet)
    assisting guerrillas and knew their whereabouts, although retribution against suspected SWAPO supporters was also a factor. The Bishops’ Conference reported in 1982: The Security Forces stop at nothing to force information out of people. They break into homes, beat up residents, shoot people, steal and kill cattle and often pillage stores and tea rooms. When the tracks of SWAPO guerrillas are discovered by the Security Forces, the local people are in danger. Harsh measures are intensified. People are blindfolded, taken from their homes and left beaten up and even dead by the roadside. Women are often raped …There is no redress because reporting irregularities or atrocities to commanders is considered a dangerous or fruitless exercise4. 113 In 1986, in a ‘false-flag operation’ that went awry, a group of recces placed a bomb near a bank in Oshakati and detonated it. The intention was to make it look like a SWAPO operation in order to justify harsh measures planned against the organisation. The bomb killed one bank employee who turned out to be the wife of a member of the same Recce detachment. No charges were ever brought. 114 During 1973, following mass detentions in Owamboland, the SAP began to hand over alleged SWAPO supporters to the bantustan authorities. After cursory hearings, the victims were publicly flogged with epokolos, the central ribs of makalani palms. Both women and men were subjected to these ‘traditional’ punishments, which resulted in extensive cuts and bruising, as well as public humiliation. 115 Dusk-to-dawn curfews were imposed on much of northern South West Africa for most of the duration of the war, although the application varied from time to time and from place to place.
    [Show full text]
  • THIS WEEK in NAMIBIA Week of June 25 - July 1, 1989 (A Weekly Report Filed by the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Southern Africa Project Staff in Namibia.)
    LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW SUITE 400 • 1400 EYE STREET, NORTHWEST • WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005 • PHONE (202) 371-1212 CABLE ADDRESS: LAWCIV, WASHINGTON, D.C. TELEX: 205662 SAP UR FACSIMILE: (202) 842-3211 THIS WEEK IN NAMIBIA Week of June 25 - July 1, 1989 (A weekly report filed by the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Southern Africa Project Staff in Namibia.) 1. Koevoet: This week was dominated by intense efforts to resolve the problem of the continuing presence of Koevoet in SWAPOL. Faced with mounting pressure from Namibian groups and independent observers, UN Secretary-General Perez de Cuellar last· week reported to the UN Security Council that the continued presence of Koevoet in the South west Africa Police was "in­ tolerable" and posed a danger to the holding of free and fair elections in Namibia. The five permanent states-members of the Security Council (chaired presently by the United states) undertook to hold bilateral discussions with South Africa on the issue. A delegation consisting of representatives from the five permanent members of the Security Council visited northern Namibia on Wednesday, 28 June, to hold discussions with church and community leaders. The discussions, however, focused less on disbanding Koevoet altogether, than on finding alternative solutions aimed at reducing Koevoet's influence. proposed suggestions included: 1. Reducing the overall number of Koevoet memhsrs in SWAPOL in part by weeding out those who are obviously illiterate and untrained; 2. Removing Koevoet from its familiar base of operations in the north by exchanging them for SWAPOL members from other parts of the country; 3.
    [Show full text]