Riot Control Agents: the Tear Gases CN, CS and OC—A Medical Review Leo J Schep,1 R J Slaughter,1 D I Mcbride2
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
CS Gas (2-Chlorobenzylidene Malononitrole) General Information
CS Gas (2-chlorobenzylidene malononitrole) General Information Key Points 2-chlorobenzylidene malononitrole or “CS” is a white crystalline solid when pure it is used by UK police forces as a temporary incapacitant spray when released, CS gas will disperse into the atmosphere in a matter of minutes exposure to CS gas may cause intense tear production, eye pain, chest tightness, coughing and sneezing skin contact will lead to burning and stinging with possible redness and blistering treatment is rarely needed because people usually recover within 15-20 minutes physical injury to the eyes may occur if CS gas is sprayed directly into them at a very close range PHE publications gateway number: 2014790 Published: October 2018 Compendium of Chemical Hazards: CS Gas (2-chlorobenzylidene malononitrole) Public Health Questions What is CS gas and what is it used for? 2-chlorobenzylidene malononitrole or “CS” is a white crystalline solid when pure. The substance causes irritation in humans and is used by UK police forces as a temporary incapacitant spray to subdue persons who pose a risk to themselves and/or the police officers and others in the vicinity. It may be dispersed in a smoke cloud or dissolved into liquid (e.g. the solvent methyl iso-butyl ketone) to be used as a spray. The CS spray carried by some UK police forces contains 5% 2-chlorobenzylidene malononitrole. It is also used by the military in training operations and for testing gas masks. These substances may be referred to as CS or tear spray/gas (not to be confused with PAVA spray which is also be referred to as tear spray/gas). -
Pepperspray, CS, & Other 'Less-Lethal' Weapons
CONTENTS: Protective Measures: p.26-27 Pepperspray: p.2-9, 14-15 Chemical Data Table: p.30 CS/CN: p.10-16 Risk Groups: p.14-15 When to do what / Other Gas Types: p. 12 Asthma: p.14 treatment algorithm: p.4 Rubber Bullets: p.19-21 Nightsticks/Batons: p.17 LAW: p.6 Concussion Grenades: p.22 CR: p.12 VOFIBA: p.7 Fear: p.24 CA: p.12 Making Remedies: p.13 Tasers: p.18 DM: p.12 Sample Card for Handing Out: Shamelessly adapted from the Black Cross Radical Health Collective, www.blackcrosscollective.org If your condition is worsening, go to an emergency room. Basic preparations: Stick with your buddy. Pepperspray, CS, & Other Work with an affinity group. Bring water. Vulnerable people like asthmatics may want to “Less-Lethal” Weapons (your logo here) avoid chemical weapons. You must remove small children from the area BEFORE Used by Rioting Police to Suppress Dissent chemical weapons are used. Check out our w h e n P o l i t r i c k s & Te l e v i s i o n f a i l t o d o s o . website <www.---.org> for lots more info on how to prepare. v3.3 Useful Numbers: Serious injuries: If you don’t know how to treat Medical Emergency: 911 an injury, get a medic, or call 911. Don’t treat Copwatch: 123-4560 someone if you don’t know how. If you are Convergence Ctr Aid Station:123-4567 injured by the police, get to a nurse practitioner, Aftercare Clinic: 123-4568 physician’s assistant, or doctor immediately Legal Team: 123-4565 and have your injury documented in case you Public Defenders: 123-4569 decide to sue. -
Camp Delta Standard Operating Procedures (SOP)
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Camp Delta Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) Headquarters, Joint Task Force - Guantanamo (JTF-GTMO) Guantanamo Bay, Cuba 28 March 2003 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Intentionally Left Blank Camp Delta SOP 28 March 2003 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Headquarters Joint Detention Operations Group (JDOG) Joint Task Force Guantanamo (JTF-GTMO) Guantanamo Bay, Cuba Effective 28 March 2003 28 March 2003 Camp Delta Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) By Order of the Commander procedures established herein apply to Supplementation. the services and agencies that Supplementation of this SOP and function in, and support thereof, establishment of command or local GEOFFREY D. MILLER detainee operations at JTF-GTMO in forms is prohibited without prior Major General, United States Army general and Camp Delta specifically. approval of the JDOG Commander, JTF-GTMO Applicability. This is a multi- Commander. service, multi-agency set of standard Suggested Improvements. Users Official: operating procedures. It applies to the are invited to send comments and Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine suggested improvements through ADOLPH MCQUEEN Corps, and Coast Guard as well as their chain of command to the Colonel, Military Police United States Government JDOG S3 for proper consideration Commander, JDOG organizations and international non- and staffing. governmental organizations operating Interim Changes. Policies and inside Camp Delta 1 - 3. procedures will be reviewed every History. This is a revised update to Proponent and exception authority. 120 days. Any interim changes the Joint Task Force Guantanamo The proponent of this set of operating will be signed by the JDOG (JTF-GTMO) standard operating procedures and special orders is the Commander and posted to the front procedures (SOP) for Camp Delta. -
* * * Chemical Agent * * * Instructor's Manual
If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. · --. -----;-:-.. -----:-~------ '~~~v:~r.·t..~ ._.,.. ~Q" .._L_~ •.• ~,,,,,.'.,J-· .. f.\...('.1..-":I- f1 tn\. ~ L. " .:,"."~ .. ,. • ~ \::'J\.,;;)\ rl~ lL/{PS-'1 J National Institute of Corrections Community Corrections Division * * * CHEMICAL AGENT * * * INSTRUCTOR'S MANUAL J. RICHARD FAULKNER, JR. CORRECTIONAL PROGRAM SPECIALIST NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CORRECTIONS WASIHNGTON, DC 20534 202-307-3106 - ext.138 , ' • 146592 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated In tl]!::; document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this "'"P 'J' ... material has been granted by Public Domain/NrC u.s. Department of Justice to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). • Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system reqllires permission of the f ._kt owner, • . : . , u.s. Deparbnent of Justice • National mstimte of Corrections Wtulringttm, DC 20534 CHEMICAL AGENTS Dangerous conditions that are present in communities have raised the level of awareness of officers. In many jurisdictions, officers have demanded more training in self protection and the authority to carry lethal weapons. This concern is a real one and administrators are having to address issues of officer safety. The problem is not a simple one that can be solved with a new policy. Because this involves safety, in fact the very lives of staff, the matter is extremely serious. Training must be adopted to fit policy and not violate the goals, scope and mission of the agency. -
Pepper Spray: What Do We Have to Expect?
Pepper Spray: What Do We Have to Expect? Assoc. Prof. Mehmet Akif KARAMERCAN, MD Gazi University School of Medicine Department of Emergency Medicine Presentation Plan • History • Pepper Spray • Tear Gas • Symptoms • Medical Treatment • If you are the victim ??? History • PEPPER SPRAY ▫ OC (oleoresin of capsicum) (Most Commonly Used Compound) • TEAR GAS ▫ CN (chloroacetophenone) (German scientists 1870 World War I and II) ▫ CS (orthochlorobenzalmalononitrile) (US Army adopted in 1959) ▫ CR (dibenzoxazepine) (British Ministry of Defence 1950-1960) History of Pepper Spray • Red Chili Pepper was being used for self defense in ancient India - China - Japan (Ninjas). ▫ Throw it at the faces of their enemies, opponents, or intruders. • Japan Tukagawa Empire police used a weapon called the "metsubishi." • Accepted as a weapon ▫ incapacitate a person temporarily. • Pepper as a weapon 14th and 15th century for slavery rampant and became a popular method for torturing people (criminals, slaves). History of Pepper Spray • 1980's The USA Postal Workers started using pepper sprays against dogs, bears and other pets and became a legalized non-lethal weapon ▫ Pepper spray is also known as oleoresin of capsicum (OC) spray • The FBI in 1987 endorse it as an official chemical agent and it took 4 years it could be legally accepted by law enforcement agency. Pepper Spray • The active ingredient in pepper spray is capsaicin, which is a chemical derived from the fruit of plants of chilis. • Extraction of Oleoresin Capsicum from peppers ▫ capsicum to be finely ground, capsaicin is then extracted using an organic solvent (ethanol). The solvent is then evaporated, remaining waxlike resin is the Oleoresin Capsicum • Propylene Glycol is used to suspend the OC in water, pressurized to make it aerosol in Pepper Spray. -
Half Way Down the Trail to Hell
Half Way Down The Trail To Hell A Wartime Remembrance in Three Parts By Stephen E. Kirkland i Prologue “The danger, being around veterans, the memories are so selective and so heroic that you’ve got to be careful talking to a guy like me.” George Herbert Walker Bush A while back I discovered the Library of Congress is conducting a program called The Veterans History Project. The mission of the project is the collection and preservation of veteran’s wartime recollections and documents before they are lost forever. Like many wartime veterans, I concentrated on getting on with my life. I needed a job that would allow me to marry, buy a house and raise a family. I didn’t feel anything I had experienced in Vietnam would contribute to these goals, and I felt that, for the most part, people who hadn’t served didn’t know or even care what I had seen or done. The country’s attitude was different than with the Gulf War veterans and I deflected the few inquires that were made, especially the ones that contained the words “Did ya’ kill anybody?” I was too busy dealing with the present to spend a lot of time staring into the past. Now, almost four decades after returning home, the time has come to look back and try to recreate a piece of personal history, albeit history filtered though my water colored memories. I’ve relied on a number of sources for this remembrance, not the least of which were letters that I wrote home. -
Negative Effects of the Use of Militarization Methods by the Police Force
Negative Effects of the Use of Militarization Methods by the Police Force Children and Adults Developmental Agency Programs, Inc. (CADAprograms) Commission on the Status of Women (CSW 65) United Nations Citizens to Abolish Domestic Apartheid, Inc 2901 Maryland Ave., P.O. Box 80 North Versailles, PA 15137 Phone: (412) 829-2711 Fax: (412) 829-2788 Email: [email protected] Website: www.cadaprograms.org Committee: Chemical Pollutant Eradication Council Chair: Dr. Janis C. Brooks 1 Presentation Outline Riot Control Agents Exposure to a riot control agent Health effects of exposure to riot control agents Treatment for riot control agents Protection and exposure to riot control agents Rubber Bullets The Americans With Disabilities Act And Law Enforcement Summary 2 Riot Control Agents Chloroacetophenone (CN) Chlorobenzylidenemalononitrile (CS) Other examples include: • Chloropicrin (PS), used as a fumigant (that is, a substance that uses fumes to disinfect an area); • Bromobenzylcyanide (CA); • Dibenzoxazepine (CR); and combinations of various agents. 3 Exposure to a riot control agent How you could be exposed to riot control agents. Fine droplets or particles Skin contact, Eye contact, or Breathing. How riot control agents work. The extent of poisoning Irritation of the area of contact (for example, eyes, skin, nose) The effects of exposure to a riot control agent 4 Health effects of exposure to riot control agents Symptoms immediately after exposure: Eyes: excessive tearing, burning, blurred vision, redness Nose: runny -
Dangerous Ambiguities: Regulation of Incapacitants and Riot Control Agents Under the Chemical Weapons Convention, OPCW Open Foru
Dangerous Ambiguities: Regulation of incapacitants and riot control agents under the Chemical Weapons Convention OPCW Open Forum Meeting, 2nd December 2009 Michael Crowley Project coordinator Bradford Nonlethal Weapon Research Project Chemical Weapons Convention • The Chemical Weapons Convention has proven to be an important defence against the horrors of chemical warfare, vitally important for protecting both military personnel and civilians alike. • Its core obligations are powerfully set out under Article 1, namely that States will never under any circumstances develop, stockpile, transfer or use chemical weapons. • However, certain ambiguities and limitations in the CWC control regime exist regarding regulation of riot control agents (RCAs) and incapacitants. If not addressed, they could endanger the stability of the Convention. Chemical Weapons Convention • Article 1: • Each State Party to this Convention undertakes never under any circumstances: •(a) To develop, produce, otherwise acquire, stockpile or retain chemical weapons, or transfer, directly or indirectly, chemical weapons to anyone; •(b) To use chemical weapons; • (c) To engage in any military preparations to use chemical weapons; •(d) To assist, encourage or induce, in any way, anyone to engage in any activity prohibited to a State Party under this Convention. [Emphasis added]. CWC: Scope of coverage • The CWC is comprehensive in the toxic chemicals it regulates. • The definition of “toxic chemicals” under Article 2.2 includes chemicals that cause “temporary incapacitation”. • Under the Convention, the use of such “toxic chemicals” would be forbidden unless employed for “purposes not prohibited” and as long as the “types and quantities” are consistent with such purposes. • Among the “purposes not prohibited” is: “law enforcement including domestic riot control”. -
How to Demilitarize the Police
HOW TO DEMILITARIZE THE POLICE Bernard E. Harcourt Isidor and Seville Sulzbacher Professor of Law and Professor of Political Science at Columbia University September 2020 INTRODUCTION As peaceful protesters throughout the United wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Heavily weaponized States challenge the police killings of Black police officers in fully armored vehicles face-off women and men, they are confronted today with against mostly peaceful and unarmed civilian fully militarized police forces, equipped with M4 protesters. A new militarized police force has been rifles, sniper scopes, camouflage gear and helmets, deployed on Main Street USA, with images like tanks and mine-resistant ambush-protected these flooding our news feeds and social media: (MRAP) vehicles, and grenade launchers from the HOW TO DEFUND POLICE MILITARIZATION 2 This was on display on June 1 in Washington, This rhetoric is not unique to the Trump D.C., after President Donald Trump mobilized administration—it reflects the reality of modern the military police and a U.S. Army Black Hawk American policing in towns and cities across helicopter to control peaceful protesters, and the country. In 2014, responding to protests in deployed the 82nd Airborne Division to D.C. Then, Ferguson, Missouri, after the police killing of after tear-gassing and shooting peaceful protesters Michael Brown, SWAT officers, dressed in Marine with rubber bullets to clear a path for that now- pattern (MARPAT) camouflage moved next to infamous church photo-op, Trump marched with armored vehicles that looked like tanks with the Secretary of Defense and the highest-ranking mounted high-caliber guns. They frequently military general, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs pointed their Mega AR-15 Marksman and M4 of Staff Mark Milley, by his side—with General rifles, sniper Leupold long-range scopes, and Milley in full combat uniform. -
Memorandum on Protests, Policing, and COVID-19
M E M O R A N D U M August 31, 2020 To: Governors’ Offices From: National Governors Association Re: Memorandum on Protests, Policing, and COVID-19 Background In recent months, mass gatherings in the form of protests and demonstrations have occurred across the country. People have gathered to protest COVID-19 restrictions and closure orders as well as to call for law enforcement reform and racial justice.1 These events, alongside the COVID-19 public health crisis, have presented challenges for Governors and state public health and public safety officials. This memorandum provides strategies for Governors to reduce the risks of spreading COVID-19 during protests while protecting public safety. The body of the memo will provide: 1) an overview of a harm- reduction approach; 2) considerations for law enforcement strategies and tactics for protest policing; and 3) opportunities for Governors and senior state officials to minimize the spread of COVID-19. Harm Reduction Approach Governors’ offices can leverage lessons learned from previous public-health strategies to prevent other health issues during protests. A harm-reduction approach to protests can serve as an effective way to support protest activity by acknowledging the inherent risks and providing interventions to reduce these risks. Developed initially for adults with substance-use disorders, harm-reduction approaches generally accept continuing levels of risk in society as inevitable and seek to reduce adverse consequences.2 This perspective emphasizes the measurement of health, social, and economic outcomes, as opposed to the measurement of infection rates.3 Governors, at their discretion, may consider a harm-reduction approach to educate protesters about how to minimize risks during protests and modify their behavior to minimize the spread of COVID-19. -
Abraham Model Correlations for Triethylene Glycol Solvent Derived from Infinite Dilution
Abraham Model Correlations for Triethylene Glycol Solvent Derived from Infinite Dilution Activity Coefficient, Partition Coefficient and Solubility Data Measured at 298.15 K Igor A. Sedova, Timur I. Magsumova, Erin Hartb, Ashley M. Ramirezb, Sarah Cheeranb, Maribel Barrerab, Melissa Y. Hortonb, Anisha Wadawadigib, Olivia Zhab, Xin Y. Tongb, William E. Acree, Jr.b and Michael H. Abrahamc a Department of Chemistry, Kazan Federal University, Kremlevskaya 18, Kazan 420008, Russia b Department of Chemistry, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle Drive #305070, Denton, TX 76203 (USA) c Department of Chemistry, University College London, 20 Gordon Street, London WC1H OAJ (UK) Abstract A gas chromatographic headspace analysis method was used to experimentally determine gas-to- liquid partition coefficients and infinite dilution activity coefficients for 29 liquid organic solutes dissolved in triethylene glycol at 298.15 K. Solubilities were also determined at 298.15 K for 23 crystalline nonelectrolyte organic compounds in triethylene glycol based on spectroscopic absorbance measurements. The experimental results of the headspace chromatographic and spectroscopic solubility measurements were converted to gas-to-triethylene glycol and water-to- triethylene glycol partition coefficients, and molar solubility ratios using standard thermodynamic relationships. Expressions were derived for solute transfer into triethylene glycol by combining our measured experimental values with published literature data. Mathematical correlations based on the Abraham model describe the observed partition coefficient and solubility data to within 0.16 log10 units (or less). 1 Key Words and Phrases: Infinite dilution activity coefficients; Molar solubility ratios; Headspace chromatographic analysis; Partition Coefficients; Solute transfer processes ________________________________________________________________________ *To whom correspondence should be addressed. (E-mail: [email protected]); fax: 940-565-4318. -
A Study for Health Hazard Evaluation of Methylene Chloride Evaporated from the Tear Gas Mixture
Saf Health Work 2010;1:98-101 | DOI:10.5491/SHAW.2010.1.1.98 pISSN : 2093-7911 eISSN : 2093-7997 Case Report A Study for Health Hazard Evaluation of Methylene Chloride Evaporated from the Tear Gas Mixture Seung-Hyun PARK, Eun-Kyo CHUNG, Gwang-Yong YI, Kwang-Jae CHUNG, Jung-Ah SHIN and In-Seop LEE Department of Occupational Environment Research, Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, KOSHA, Incheon, Korea This study explored the health hazard of those exposed to methylene chloride by assessing its atmospheric concentration when a tear gas mixture was aerially dispersed. The concentration of methylene chloride ranged from 311.1–980.3 ppm (geometric mean, 555.8 ppm), 30 seconds after the dispersion started. However, the concentration fell rapidly to below 10 ppm after dispersion was completed. The concentration during the dispersion did not surpass the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health ‘immediately dangerous to life or health’ value of 2,300 ppm, but did exceed the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists excursion limit of 250 ppm. Since methylene chloride is highly volatile (vapor pressure, 349 mmHg at 20oC), the post- dispersion atmospheric concentration can rise instantaneously. Moreover, the o-chlorobenzylidenemalononitrile formulation of tear gas (CS gas) is an acute upper respiratory tract irritant. Therefore, tear gas mixtures should be handled with delicate care. Key Words: Methylene chloride, CS tear gas, Tear gas mixture, Health hazard evaluation Introduction Despite this long history of use, CS gas has recently come under greater scrutiny since it can be applied as a mixture that Tear gases such as o-chlorobenzylidenemalononitrile (CS), contains a suspected human carcinogen, methylene chloride.