Decorated Etruscan Stone Sarcophagi a Chronological and Bibliographical Appendix to R
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
BABesch 76 (2001) Decorated Etruscan Stone Sarcophagi A Chronological and Bibliographical Appendix to R. Herbig, Die jüngeretruskischen Steinsarkophage (Berlin 1952) L.B. van der Meer Most Etruscan stone sarcophagi of the last four cen- dated after the mighty battle between the Romans turies B.C. have been published in a well illustrated and a coalition of groups of Samnites, Umbrians, catalogue by R. Herbig in 1952. Most of them have Etruscans and Gauls at Sentinum (Umbria) in 295 not been dated by him, or only very tentatively. B.C. The Tomba della Pellegrina at Chiusi, belonging Many articles, (hand)books on Etruscan art, corpora to a Sentinate family, contains sarcophagi and urns, (CIE), dictionaries (ET, ThesLE) and the LIMC all datable after c. 290 B.C. Two urns show Celto- mention sarcophagi but usually assign them a very machies, that, just like the name Sentinate, may generic date if at all. The dates proposed by different refer to Sentinum, as suggested by Maggiani.6 Most scholars vary from twentyfive to one hundred and sarcophagi from Vulci are datable before 280 B.C., fifty years for individual sarcophagi.1 It is difficult to when Rome conquered this city. The few sarcophagi find comprehensively and quickly the most reliable from Orvieto, most probably to be identified with dates in recent literature. What follows, is intended Volsinii veteres, can be dated to before the Roman therefore as an updated Appendix to Herbig’s cata- destruction in 264 B.C. logue and some other publications, concerning sar- The Appendix (see below) consists of four sections: cophagi, the chests of which are decorated with Section H: sarcophagi published by R. Herbig; painted representations and/or scenes in relief. Since Section G: sarcophagi published by K.-P. Goethert, 1952 research carried out on tomb contents and new but not mentioned by Herbig; excavations of tombs have shed more light on chro- Section CU: sarcophagi edited by M. Moretti and nology. It appears that the dates proposed by K.-P. A.M. Sgubini Moretti; Goethert, Typologie und Chronologie der jünger- Section O: other sarcophagi not mentioned in sec- etruskischen Steinsarkophage (diss. Berlin 1974) are tions H, G or CU. too low.2 The production of stone sarcophagi with Each catalogue number mentions respectively the decorated chests took place mainly between c. 350 place of preservation, the find-spot and, if known, the and 200/180 B.C. Some exceptional items may be name of the tomb, data absent or incorrectly entered dated to around 400 B.C.3 After c. 200 B.C. chests of in former publications, the proposed date, the bibli- stone sarcophagi were rarely decorated. The study ography, and literature on the inscription(s), including of sarcophagi is important because of the relation- H. Rix, Etruskische Texte. Editio Minor I-II, Tübingen ships between the production centres, stylistic devel- 1991.7 Publications already cited by Herbig, are not opments and thematic shifts in the fourth and third repeated. All abbreviations of publications can be centuries B.C., and the status and mentality of the found in the Bibliography8 after the Appendix. deceased. Using and calibrating the chronological studies by 1 Cristofani 1988, 71 n. 38. Cristofani 1989, 610 n. 49. G. Colonna, of M. Moretti/A.M. Sgubini Moretti 2 The same can be said for the chronological studies of Thimme (eds.), I Curunas di Tuscania (1983), and many other (1954; 1957). It seems that Steuernagel (1998) has averaged the specialist publications, based on tomb contents high and low dates. 3 See below, Appendix H83. As for H22, see Colonna 1985, 121. and/or formal, stylistic, antiquarian, thematic, epi- Both should be dated, in my opinion, after c. 350 B.C. graphic, palaeographic, and genealogical data I have 4 Chests without relevant lids are difficult to date. tried to date, as far as possible,4 all known c. 150 5 The clustering of sarcophagi with similar characteristics was decorated sarcophagus chests and pertinent lids. The done using dBase III+. chronological limit for such dating is a quarter of a 6 Maggiani 1990, 297-217. See also Colonna 1993, 346. H14 5 (from Chiusi) with a Celtomachia scene also belongs to a century (c. one generation). I have also aimed to Sentinate. About Celtomachiae see also Maggiani, in Artigianato update the bibliography of every single sarcophagus, 1985, 119 and Steingräber 1998, 91-98. including dates which differ from the most reliable, 7 Rix does not refer to Herbig (1952) or other archaeological publications on sarcophagi. My Appendix can also serve as sup- recent research results. Apart from the data mentioned, plement to Rix’s Konkordanz in ET I, 246-320. historical events may provide a terminus post or ante 8 The Bibliography on Etruscan stone sarcophagi is as complete quem. Sarcophagi with Celtomachia scenes can be as possible. 79 Other abbreviations are: HS = Hallensarkophage; Parastadensarkophagus (PT), found with fragments HT-type = Holztruhentypus; PT = Parastadentypus; of a gable-roof lid. The chest is decorated in relief on FT= Fassadentypus. four sides. The scenes on the long sides are flanked Bo = Bolsena; Bom = Bomarzo; Ch = Chiusi; Mu by winged, male demons. It was found together with = Musarna; No = Norchia; Orv = Orvieto; S. Gi = two Faliscan red figure vases, which can be dated San Giuliano; Ta = Tarquinia; Tu = Tuscania; Vit = to the end of the fourth century B.C. Viterbo; Vo = Volterra; Vu = Vulci. L. = left. R. = To the Parastaden-type belong: H70 (Vu), H73 right. Cap. = inscription in the capital alphabet (see (Orv), H99 (Ta), H100 (Ta), G15 (Vu). The latest below). Amazonomachy sarcophagi are H120, the so called Sarcophagus of the Magnate, with his head slightly turned to the viewer, and CU I, 2, the lid figure of CHRONOLOGICAL SURVEY which also turns his head to the observer. The folds of the mantle on his left stretched leg are straight The development of decorated sarcophagus chests (cf. hereafter H193). and lids can be broadly divided in 6 periods: from The second theme, the Tierkampf, occurs in other c. 350 to 300, the period around 300, from c. 300 to Etruscan art genres. It is found on tomb paintings, 275, from c.275 to 250, from c. 250 to 225, and vase paintings, the Bronze Lamp of Cortona, and on from c. 225 until the beginning of the second cen- Apulian red figure vases from after c. 350 B.C. M. tury B.C. Cristofani dated the Tierkampf paintings in the Tomba François between c. 340 and 310 B.C. The a) The period from c. 350 to 300 B.C. latest examples of Tierkampf sarcophagi are H84 and H193 which show lid figures slightly turning Between c. 350 and 300 B.C. the lids have a gable- their head and upper body towards the observer. roof or they show figures lying flat on their back. They may be dated at the end of the fourth century Many chests belong to the Holzkasten- or Holztruhen- B.C. H193 shows a pattern of straight folds on the typus (HT-type), which imitate wooden chests. The left stretched leg of the lid figure. This pattern is form may be of Greek origin; it is known from many characteristic of a group of sarcophagi belonging to fourth century B.C. items from Kerch and Alexandria the period of c. 300 to 275 B.C. H84 is a HT-type; (Watzinger 1905). On one or more sides is a small on the left and right of the long sides winged demons rectangular recession which originally may have had in high relief are frontally rendered. Especially inter- a painted decoration (cf. O5). Funerary stone beds esting is G76 (without lid) from the Tomba delle in the Tomba Giglioli at Tarquinia offer an interest- Amazzoni at Tuscania. Under the sarcophagus an ing point of reference. The wallpaintings in the tomb aes grave of 262 gram was found. This coin, from have been dated by Steingräber to the second half a local mint, is dated between c. 300 and 280 B.C. of the fourth century B.C. It does not necessarily provide a terminus post quem To the Holztruhen-type belong: H22 (Orv), H62 as K.-P. Goethert proposes. It indicates the moment (Bom), H72 (Orv), H74 (Ch), H84 (Bom), H92, in or after which the chest was placed in the tomb. H93, H94 (Ta), H102, H103, H104, H127, H193, For stylistic reasons A.M. Sgubini Moretti dates the G104 (No), 05 (S. Gi), 06 (No). H90 (S. Gi) is a chest between c. 330 and 320 B.C. It must have transitional type. Its short sides have recessions; its been made during the lifetime of the deceased, a front shows figures in appliqué style between two custom known from Roman sarcophagi too. The cornices. With possibly one exception9 lids on HT- chest shows tiny columns at three corners. It seems sarcophagi have a gable-roof or show flatly extended to be a forerunner of the so called Hallensarkophage recumbent figures. One item with a gabled lid has (HS), which were made around 300 B.C. (see been found in the Sperandio necropolis at Perugia.10 below). Three main themes occur, sometimes together, on The third theme, antithetical demons rendered in one chest: the Amazonomachy (sometimes painted), appliqué style on the left and right of the long the Tierkampf (animal battle), and antithetical death side(s) of the chests, occurs on H62 (HT-type), H70 demons on the left and right of the long side(s) of a (PT), H73, H84, H188, H241, G105, O1 and O6. chest. These themes disappear after c.