Kiribati: South Tarawa Water Supply Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kiribati: South Tarawa Water Supply Project Initial Environmental Examination October 2019 Kiribati: South Tarawa Water Supply Project Prepared by the Ministry of Infrastructure and Sustainable Energy for the Asian Development Bank and World Bank. This is an updated version of the draft originally posted in August 2019 available on https://www.adb.org/projects/documents/kir-49453-002-rrp. This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. South Tarawa Water Supply Project (RRP KIR 49453) Environmental Assessment Document Project No.: 49453-002 Date: August 2019 Status: Draft Final Kiribati: South Tarawa Water Supply Project Environmental and Social Impact Assessment This environmental and social impact assessment (ESIA) report complies with the country safeguard system requirements of Kiribati with additional elements as required to also comply with the safeguard requirements of the Asian Development Bank and World Bank. This report does not constitute an EIA for category A projects as per the ADB Safeguard Policy Statement 2009 or World Bank OP 4.01. For this project the EIA is an assessment commensurate with the risks and impacts of a category B project. This ESIA is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the Board of Directors, Management, or staff, of the Asian Development Bank and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to any particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank or World Bank do not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Table of Contents Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................... iii Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... v Section 1 – Introduction and background to the project ......................................................................1 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Location .............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Background to Bonriki and Buota water reserves .............................................................................. 3 1.4 Project purpose and objectives .......................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Need for the project ........................................................................................................................... 6 1.6 Profile of the project proponent ........................................................................................................ 8 1.7 Contact details for the proponent ...................................................................................................... 8 Section 2 – Policy and legal framework ...............................................................................................9 2.1 National, regional, provincial or customary laws and regulations ..................................................... 9 2.2 Multilateral environmental agreements .......................................................................................... 10 2.3 Health, safety, hazard and risk management standards .................................................................. 11 2.4 Environmental policies of financing institutions involved in the project ......................................... 11 Section 3 – Description of the baseline environment ........................................................................ 13 3.1 Climate .............................................................................................................................................. 13 3.2 Topography, geology and soils ......................................................................................................... 14 3.3 Water ................................................................................................................................................ 15 3.4 Marine............................................................................................................................................... 15 3.5 Coastal flora and fauna ..................................................................................................................... 17 3.6 Marine flora and fauna ..................................................................................................................... 17 3.7 Terrestrial flora and fauna ................................................................................................................ 20 3.8 Land tenure, zoning and use ............................................................................................................. 21 3.9 Human communities......................................................................................................................... 21 3.10 Local and national economy ........................................................................................................... 25 Section 4– Project description and justification................................................................................. 27 4.1 Project components .......................................................................................................................... 27 4.2 Analysis of alternatives ..................................................................................................................... 44 4.3 Project benefits ................................................................................................................................. 47 i Section 5 – Risk assessment ............................................................................................................. 49 5.1 Component 1: Improvement of water supply services .................................................................... 49 5.1.1 Pre-construction and design phase............................................................................................ 49 5.1.2 Construction phase .................................................................................................................... 52 5.1.3 Operation phase......................................................................................................................... 64 5.2 Component 5.1: sanitation pilot ....................................................................................................... 74 Section 7 – Environmental and social management .......................................................................... 77 7.1 Institutional arrangements for environmental management .................................................... 78 7.2 Environmental management framework.................................................................................... 83 7.4 Grievance redress mechanism .................................................................................................. 103 Section 8 – Local community, stakeholder engagement and consultation ........................................ 106 8.1 Dates, types and methods of engagement and consultation, and outcomes to date ................... 106 8.2 Key findings from engagement and consultation ........................................................................... 107 8.3 Future engagement and consultation activities ............................................................................. 109 8.4 Negotiation and agreements with directly affected persons and land/resource owners ............. 109 8.5 Information disclosure ........................................................................................................................ 109 Section 9 – Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 110 References .................................................................................................................................... 112 Appendices .................................................................................................................................... 114 Appendix 1: MELAD response to Environmental License Application Appendix 2: Land Options for Desalination Plant Appendix 3: Water Supply Infrastructure - Summary of Proposed Upgrades Appendix 4: Minutes of Community Consultations List of Figures Figure 1.1 - Location map of Republic of Kiribati ....................................................................................... 2 Figure 1.2 - Tarawa Atoll ............................................................................................................................ 3 Figure 3.1 - Seaward
Recommended publications
  • Enhancing Safety, Security and Sustainability of Apia Port: Due
    Due Diligence Report Project Number: 47358-002 May 2019 SAM: Enhancing Safety, Security and Sustainability of Apia Port Project (Grant xxxx) Prepared by the Samoa Ports Authority for the Asian Development Bank. This due diligence report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgements as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Enhancing Safety, Security and Sustainability of Apia Port – Social and Poverty Assessment Report CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 4 April 2016) Tala – Samoan Tala (SAT) = $1.00 = ABBREVIATIONS ADB - Asian Development Bank AUA - Apia Urban Area DDR - Due Diligence Report EA - Executing Agency EMP - Environmental Management Plan EPA - Environmental Protection Agency GOS - Government of the Samoa GRM - Grievance Redress Mechanism HIES - Household Income and Expenditures Survey IA - Implementing Agency IP - Indigenous People IR - Involuntary Resettlement MNRE - Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment MOF - Ministry of Finance MOR - Ministry of Revenue PIC - Pacific Island Countries PUMA - Planning and Urban Management Authority RP - Resettlement Plan SPA - Samoa Ports Authority
    [Show full text]
  • Maiana Social and Economic Report 2008
    M AIANA ISLAND 2008 SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE PRODUCED BY THE MINISTRY OF INTERNAL AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS, WITH FINANCIAL SUPPORT FROM THE UNITED NATION DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM, AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE SECRETARIAT OF THE PACIFIC COMMUNITY. Strengthening Decentralized Governance in Kiribati Project P.O. Box 75, Bairiki, Tarawa, Republic of Kiribati Telephone (686) 22741 or 22040, Fax: (686) 21133 MAIANA ANTHEM MAIANA I TANGIRIKO MAIANA I LOVE YOU Maiana I tangiriko - 2 - FOREWORD by the Honourable Amberoti Nikora, Minister of Internal and Social Affairs, July, 2007 I am honored to have this opportunity to introduce this revised and updated socio-economic profile for Maiana island. The completion of this profile is the culmination of months of hard-work and collaborative effort of many people, Government agencies and development partners particularly those who have provided direct financial and technical assistance towards this important exercise. The socio-economic profiles contain specific data and information about individual islands that are not only interesting to read, but more importantly, useful for education, planning and decision making. The profile is meant to be used as a reference material for leaders both at the island and national level, to enable them to make informed decisions that are founded on accurate and easily accessible statistics. With our limited natural and financial resources it is very important that our leaders are in a position to make wise decisions regarding the use of these limited resources, so that they are targeted at the most urgent needs and produce maximum impact. In addition, this profile will act as reference material that could be used for educational purposes, at the secondary and tertiary levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Kiribati Fourth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity
    KIRIBATI FOURTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Aranuka Island (Gilbert Group) Picture by: Raitiata Cati Prepared by: Environment and Conservation Division - MELAD 20 th September 2010 1 Contents Acknowledgement ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Chapter 1: OVERVIEW OF BIODIVERSITY, STATUS, TRENDS AND THREATS .................................................... 8 1.1 Geography and geological setting of Kiribati ......................................................................................... 8 1.2 Climate ................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Status of Biodiversity ........................................................................................................................... 10 1.3.1 Soil ................................................................................................................................................. 12 1.3.2 Water Resources ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Political, Security, and Climate Landscape in Oceania
    The Political, Security, and Climate Landscape in Oceania Prepared for the US Department of Defense’s Center for Excellence in Disaster Management and Humanitarian Assistance May 2020 Written by: Jonah Bhide Grace Frazor Charlotte Gorman Claire Huitt Christopher Zimmer Under the supervision of Dr. Joshua Busby 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 United States 8 Oceania 22 China 30 Australia 41 New Zealand 48 France 53 Japan 61 Policy Recommendations for US Government 66 3 Executive Summary Research Question The current strategic landscape in Oceania comprises a variety of complex and cross-cutting themes. The most salient of which is climate change and its impact on multilateral political networks, the security and resilience of governments, sustainable development, and geopolitical competition. These challenges pose both opportunities and threats to each regionally-invested government, including the United States — a power present in the region since the Second World War. This report sets out to answer the following questions: what are the current state of international affairs, complexities, risks, and potential opportunities regarding climate security ​ issues and geostrategic competition in Oceania? And, what policy recommendations and approaches should the US government explore to improve its regional standing and secure its national interests? The report serves as a primer to explain and analyze the region’s state of affairs, and to discuss possible ways forward for the US government. Given that we conducted research from August 2019 through May 2020, the global health crisis caused by the novel coronavirus added additional challenges like cancelling fieldwork travel. However, the pandemic has factored into some of the analysis in this report to offer a first look at what new opportunities and perils the United States will face in this space.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4: Sea Level Rise and Implications for Low Lying Islands, Coasts and Communities Supplementary Material
    FINAL DRAFT Chapter 4 Supplementary Material IPCC SR Ocean and Cryosphere Chapter 4: Sea Level Rise and Implications for Low Lying Islands, Coasts and Communities Supplementary Material Coordinating Lead Authors: Michael Oppenheimer (USA), Bruce Glavovic (New Zealand) Lead Authors: Jochen Hinkel (Germany), Roderik van de Wal (Netherlands), Alexandre K. Magnan (France), Amro Abd-Elgawad (Egypt), Rongshuo Cai (China), Miguel Cifuentes-Jara (Costa Rica), Robert M. Deconto (USA), Tuhin Ghosh (India), John Hay (Cook Islands), Federico Isla (Argentina), Ben Marzeion (Germany), Benoit Meyssignac (France), Zita Sebesvari (Hungary/Germany) Contributing Authors: Robbert Biesbroek (Netherlands), Maya K. Buchanan (USA), Gonéri Le Cozannet (France), Catia Domingues (Australia), Sönke Dangendorf (Germany), Petra Döll (Germany), Virginie K.E. Duvat (France), Tamsin Edwards (UK), Alexey Ekaykin (Russian Federation), Donald Forbes (Canada), James Ford (UK), Miguel D. Fortes (Philippines), Thomas Frederikse (Netherlands), Jean-Pierre Gattuso (France), Robert Kopp (USA), Erwin Lambert (Netherlands), Judy Lawrence (New Zealand), Andrew Mackintosh (New Zealand), Angélique Melet (France), Elizabeth McLeod (USA), Mark Merrifield (USA), Siddharth Narayan (US), Robert J. Nicholls (UK), Fabrice Renaud (UK), Jonathan Simm (UK), AJ Smit (South Africa), Catherine Sutherland (South Africa), Nguyen Minh Tu (Vietnam), Jon Woodruff (USA), Poh Poh Wong (Singapore), Siyuan Xian (USA) Review Editors: Ayako Abe-Ouchi (Japan), Kapil Gupta (India), Joy Pereira (Malaysia) Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • Kiribati from the Least Developed Country Category
    Department of Economic and Social Affairs Secretariat of the Committee for Development Policy Ex-ante impact assessment of likely consequences of graduation of the Republic of Kiribati from the least developed country category United Nations, New York, October 2008 1 Impact assessment: Kiribati Table of contents Impact Assessment: Kiribati........................................................................................................... 3 Summary........................................................................................................................................ 3 1. Background ............................................................................................................................... 3 2. Methodology .............................................................................................................................. 4 3. Special support measures due to LDC status......................................................................... 6 3.1. World Trade Organization related benefits.................................................................... 6 3.2. LDC status and preferential market access..................................................................... 7 3.2.1. Main products and markets....................................................................................... 7 3.3. Support measures related to capacity building in trade .............................................. 14 3.4. Official Development Assistance .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rising Islands
    THESIS FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN GEOGRAPHY JUNE 2015 Rising Islands Enhancing adaptive capacities in Kiribati through Migration with Dignity SANDRA DUONG Master's Thesis in Geography, 30 credits Supervisor: Martina Angela Caretta Department of Human Geography, Stockholm University www.humangeo.su.se ABSTRACT Duong, Sandra (2015). Rising Islands - Enhancing adaptive capacities in Kiribati through Migration with Dignity. Human Geography, advanced level, Master thesis for Master Exam in Human Geography, 30 ECTS credits. Supervisor: Martina Angela Caretta Language: English The main body of research within climate-change induced migration has focused on displacement migration. The “sinking islands” reference is often used to describe island states being in the forefront of climate change impacts, and their inhabitants at risk of becoming the first climate change refugees in history. The aim of this thesis is to understand what circumstances are needed for Kiribati’s ‘Migration with Dignity’ concept to enhance the adaptive capacity of livelihoods. By using the Sustainable Livelihood Approach this thesis examines what impacts climate change has on different aspects of livelihoods in Kiribati. This study uses a case study approach. Data has been collected through 14 semi-structured interviews during an eight weeks long minor field study on the capital atoll South Tarawa. While Kiribati faces many development challenges, being a least developed country with a rent-based economy, climate change puts additional strains on the country’s capacities to cope with the increasing monetization and urbanisation, and abilities to satisfy the growing population’s aspirations. The empirical evidence shows a need among the population to find education and skilled wage employment.
    [Show full text]
  • Countries and Their Capital Cities Cheat Sheet by Spaceduck (Spaceduck) Via Cheatography.Com/4/Cs/56
    Countries and their Capital Cities Cheat Sheet by SpaceDuck (SpaceDuck) via cheatography.com/4/cs/56/ Countries and their Captial Cities Countries and their Captial Cities (cont) Countries and their Captial Cities (cont) Afghani​ stan Kabul Canada Ottawa Federated States of Palikir Albania Tirana Cape Verde Praia Micronesia Algeria Algiers Cayman Islands George Fiji Suva American Samoa Pago Pago Town Finland Helsinki Andorra Andorra la Vella Central African Republic Bangui France Paris Angola Luanda Chad N'Djamena French Polynesia Papeete Anguilla The Valley Chile Santiago Gabon Libreville Antigua and Barbuda St. John's Christmas Island Flying Fish Gambia Banjul Cove Argentina Buenos Aires Georgia Tbilisi Cocos (Keeling) Islands West Island Armenia Yerevan Germany Berlin Colombia Bogotá Aruba Oranjestad Ghana Accra Comoros Moroni Australia Canberra Gibraltar Gibraltar Cook Islands Avarua Austria Vienna Greece Athens Costa Rica San José Azerbaijan Baku Greenland Nuuk Côte d'Ivoire Yamous‐​ Bahamas Nassau Grenada St. George's soukro Bahrain Manama Guam Hagåtña Croatia Zagreb Bangladesh Dhaka Guatemala Guatemala Cuba Havana City Barbados Bridgetown Cyprus Nicosia Guernsey St. Peter Port Belarus Minsk Czech Republic Prague Guinea Conakry Belgium Brussels Democratic Republic of the Kinshasa Guinea-​ Bissau Bissau Belize Belmopan Congo Guyana Georgetown Benin Porto-Novo Denmark Copenhagen Haiti Port-au​ -P‐​ Bermuda Hamilton Djibouti Djibouti rince Bhutan Thimphu Dominica Roseau Honduras Tegucig​ alpa Bolivia Sucre Dominican Republic Santo
    [Show full text]
  • Suva and Lautoka
    WHO WE ARE: • Pacific Direct Line (PDL) is a Shipping Company specialising in providing liner shipper services to the South Pacific Region. • We have been trading in the region for over 40 years • The Company has been owned and managed by the same family since it’s formation and prides itself on the close family bond which is the backbone of the company and all its subsidiary businesses. • In 2006 PDL sold 51% of the business to Pacific International Line (PIL) in Singapore. • Our core business has been to provide shipping services from New Zealand and Australia to the Pacific Islands, but we have repositioned the business over the last five years to also provide feedering services for various international operators. WHAT WE DO: • We offer liner shipping services to 16 countries and 22 ports including Fiji, (Suva and Lautoka) Samoa, American Samoa, Tonga, (Nuku’alofa), Wallis and Futuna, Funafuti, Vanuatu, ( Port Vila and Santo) New Caledonia, Tahiti, the Cook Islands (Rarotonga), Norfolk, Tarawa and Majuro. • PDL owns Transam Agencies throughout the Pacific, ensuring consistent standards and levels of service across the region. (see attached) • Our fleet of vessels are chartered mainly from our parent company, (PIL) and we are constantly upgrading our fleet to larger brand new vessels purpose built for this unique trade. This advantage allows us to select our vessels to cater for the growth in the volume from the influx of transhipment containers to the South Pacific. • We are developing “bolt on” businesses ensuring vertical integration of our services across cartage, consolidation, stevedoring, container depots… • PDL employs approximately 300 people throughout the Pacific in our shipping, agency and subsidiary companies.
    [Show full text]
  • SPX Schedule EB
    South Pacific Express Connection Schedule EASTBOUND SAILINGS September 2021 - December 2021 Connecting the South Pacific with the US September 21, 2021 Origin Vessel | Auckland | Nuku'alofa | Lautoka | Suva Eastbound Sailings │Papeete | Pago Pago │ Apia │ Nukualofa | Honolulu │ US West Coast Origin Vessel Auckland Nukualofa Lautoka Suva Apia Arrivals Papeete Pago Pago Apia Long Beach Oakland Honolulu Manoa 444W Imua 106 Arkadia 531 Sailed 9/15 Sailed 9/20 Wed, 22-Sep Thu, 23-Sep Tue, 28-Sep Fri, 24-Sep Thu, 30-Sep Wed, 29-Sep Thu, 14-Oct Sat, 16-Oct Sat, 23-Oct Manoa 445W Olomana 134 Cap Salia 967 Mon, 27-Sep Sun, 3-Oct Omit Tue, 5-Oct Sun, 10-Oct Mon, 11-Oct Sat, 16-Oct Sat, 16-Oct Sat, 30-Oct Mon, 1-Nov Sat, 6-Nov R J Pfeiffer 486W Imua 107 Arkadia 532 Wed, 13-Oct Tue, 19-Oct Thu, 21-Oct Fri, 22-Oct Wed, 27-Oct Wed, 27-Oct Tue, 2-Nov Mon, 1-Nov Tue, 16-Nov Thu, 18-Nov Sat, 27-Nov Olomana 135 Cap Salia 968 Wed, 27-Oct Tue, 2-Nov Omit Thu, 4-Nov Tue, 9-Nov Fri, 12-Nov Wed, 17-Nov Wed, 17-Nov Thu, 2-Dec Sat, 4-Dec Imua 108 Arkadia 533 Wed, 17-Nov Tue, 23-Nov Thu, 25-Nov Fri, 26-Nov Wed, 1-Dec Mon, 29-Nov Sat, 4-Dec Sat, 4-Dec Sun, 19-Dec Tue, 21-Dec 1 Agents and Offices U.S. Ports Pago Pago, American Samoa Papeete, Tahiti Matson Customer Service Center Molida Shipping Agency, Ltd Papeete Seairland Transports Tel: 1-866-662-4826 Tel: (684) 633-2777 Tel: (689) 40549700 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Apia, Samoa Nukualofa, Tonga Christmas Island Molida Shipping Agency, Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Ciguatera and Other Marine Poisoning in the Gilbert Islands' M
    Ciguatera and Other Marine Poisoning in the Gilbert Islands' M. J. COOPER 2 AMONG THE ANIMALS that live in the sea are was involved little.notice was taken. During and many that may be poisonous to eat; these ani­ after World W ar II attention was drawn to the mals include fish, sharks, crabs, molluscs, and problem, as there.were .many..rnore.people.in the · turtles. Of all marine animals the most impor­ Pacific who were poisoned by supposedly good tant are fish, which are for so many people an food fish, often in-areas where toxic fish had essential source of food. There are a number of been previously unknown. different ways in which teleost fish may be poi­ Although the symptoms of ciguatera poison­ sonous. Some fish are naturally poisonous; puf­ ing, the species of fish likely to-cause it, and fers for instance are always toxic. Some species many of the areas harboring toxic species have of fish can be poisonous at certain seasons; in been recorded, several aspects ''of the .problem Fiji there is a species of sardine which may be still remain to be solved. In spite of recent re­ deadly poisonous in the later months of the search into ciguatera poisoning,an'antidote to year. A third type of poisoning is found where the poison, a field test for distinguishing atoxic some fish are poisonous to eat when they are fish from a nontoxic one, the ,true nature of the caught on certain reefs or parts of a reef, and yet toxin, and the cause of the development of-eigua­ when caught on other parts of the same reef, or tera among fishes have not yet been discovered.
    [Show full text]
  • Betio, Bairiki, and Bikenibeu Sewer System Subproject Initial Environmental Examination
    Initial Environmental Examination August 2014 Kiribati: South Tarawa Sanitation Improvement Sector Project Prepared by Ministry of Public Works and Utilities, Government of Kiribati for the Asian Development Bank. This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area REPUBLIC OF KIRIBATI MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITIES SOUTH TARAWA SANITATION IMPROVEMENT SECTOR PROJECT CONTRACT DOCUMENTS For the Rehabilitation of Sewerage and Saltwater Systems in Betio, Bairiki and Bikenibeu Contract No. KIR-STSISP-Works ICB-01 VOLUME 4 BEIA – Sewerage system and Anaerobic Digester – ICB01 and Environmental Consultations Environmental License RAP – Resettlement Action Plan August 2014 CONTENTS BEIA – Sewerage system and Anaerobic Digester – ICB01 Environmental Consultations Environmental License RAP – Resettlement Action Plan SOUTH TARAWA SANITATION SECTOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Sewer System Subproject BASIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (BEIA) Prepared By: The Kiribati Ministry of Public Works and Utilities and Their Consultant Snowy Mountain Engineering Corporation International Ltd. Date:
    [Show full text]