Energy Efficiency Qualifications Energy Efficiency Qualifications

From road, rail, energy and water systems to enhancing environments and creating new buildings and communities, our vision is to make the world a better place.

What differentiates us from others is AECOM is built to deliver the collaborative way we work globally a better world. and deliver locally. A trusted partner We design, build, finance and to our clients, we draw together teams operate infrastructure assets of engineers, planners, architects, for governments, businesses landscape architects, environmental and organizations in more Engineering News-Record’s 2017 specialists, economists, scientists than 150 countries. 2017 Top 500 Design Firm and program managers—all dedicated Survey recognized us as the to finding the most innovative and industry’s #1 firm overall. appropriate solutions and improving the quality of life for those affected by each employees87,000 #1 Design Firm project. #1 Transportation Formed from many of the world’s finest #1 Environment engineering, design, environmental offices500 worldwide #1 General Building and planning companies, AECOM’s technical expertise and creative #2 Water excellence combine to provide fully countries150+ #3 Power integrated planning, design, engineering, environment and program management capabilities to a broad range of markets. revenue17.4B 2016 most admired Our adaptable and flexible approach Considered one of to projects allows us to deliver with Fortune 500’s most consistency, longevity, high quality and 7 admired companies with efficiencies in cost and time. continents

2 AECOM AECOM 3 Energy Efficiency Qualifications

Power markets we serve

AECOM's energy efficiency Energy Efficiency −− Energy Savings Performance Contracting (ESPC) Our technologies include: projects enhance system −− Energy efficiency facility modernization −− Cogeneration, distributed generation and −− Retro- and monitoring-based commission services renewable energy −− Demand management and demand response −− Facility improvement and optimization projects — infrastructure, reduce energy −− Energy master planning heating and cooling −− Resiliency planning and water consumption, −− Innovative project financial solutions −− Lighting design and implementation −− Investment-grade audit −− Industrial Controls Systems (ICS) generate on-site energy from −− Design/build −− New and expanded central utility plants Clean Energy traditional or renewable sources −− Strategic energy planning Integrated energy networks −− Engineering and design −− Microgrids/smart grids and provide financial solutions −− Project development support −− Distributed generation −− Project management −− Energy efficiency −− Construction management −− Smart City development backed by a performance −− Financial investment −− System resilience guarantee. −− Systems integration and communication Combined Heating and Power

−− Facility energy consumption/requirements −− Turnkey construction evaluation −− EPC (engineer/procure/construct) −− Review and selection of appropriate technology −− Start-up and commissioning −− Engineering and design −− Owner’s engineer −− Major equipment procurement −− Construction management

Energy Storage

−− Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) −− Interconnection studies −− Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) −− Geotechnical studies and analyses −− Battery Back-Up −− Groundwater modeling, hydrology studies, scour −− Pumped hydro analysis and hydrologic design −− Asset and property transfer due diligence

Renewable Energy

Alternative and −− Preliminary project analysis −− Stakeholder meetings, planning renewable energy −− Wind assessments and implementation −− Solar −− Load forecasting −− Environmental resource studies −− Wind −− Private participation / financing advice and impact assessment −− Hydroelectric −− Preliminary engineering −− Permitting −− Biomass −− Civil, mechanical and electrical −− Project and construction −− Geothermal engineering design management

Smart Energy

Energy management consulting Grid/infrastructure −− Master planning and analysis −− Microgrids and smart cities −− Auditing −− Distributed generation −− Monitoring-based commissioning −− Infrastructure reliability upgrades −− Energy efficient renovation and construction −− Commissioning services −− LEED certification management −− Energy sustainability consulting

4 AECOM AECOM 5 Energy Efficiency Qualifications

Our team has the unrivaled ability to strategically plan, develop, design and construct projects to enhance system infrastructure, reduce Energy efficiency capabilities energy and water consumption and generate on-site energy from traditional or renewable sources AECOM recommends the most cost- such as solar power. effective energy solutions to provide our clients with optimal long-term project performance and exceptional results.

As one of the only global planning, AECOM does not manufacture, engineering and construction sell or represent any specific management firms that is also a equipment or technology. We focus National Association of Energy on recommending the most cost- Service Companies (NAESCO)– effective energy solutions that accredited energy services company, provide our clients with optimal AECOM is increasingly sought long-term project performance and out by our clients to develop and exceptional results. execute comprehensive energy AECOM has provided energy efficiency, renewable energy and efficiency solutions for 28 years. power generation projects. As These facilities include federal, an engineering-based ESCO, we state and municipally-operated bring a variety of unique skills and office buildings, higher education capabilities to our clients from a and K-12 facilities, courthouses vendor-neutral perspective. and correctional facilities as well as healthcare, transportation, industrial, residential, water and wastewater treatment plants.

Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC) Sustainable Infrastructure Assessment in Europe and Southeast U.S.

California State University Fullerton, Comprehensive Energy Efficiency Program — Construction of a new Guantanamo Bay $18 million Trigeneration Power Energy Savings Plant Performance Contract

6 AECOM AECOM 7 Energy Efficiency Qualifications

New York Presbyterian Hospital Bronx, New York, U.S.

Installation of a Cogeneration System to enable the hospital to produce their own electricity and generate their own steam.

Why choose AECOM

AECOM Technical Services, Inc. is Our team has the unrivalled ability a fully accredited Energy Services to develop, design and/or construct +90 years Company (ESCO) that provides a wide projects to enhance electrical system of legacy company experience; range of services from traditional infrastructure, reduce energy use we have conceived, planned and consulting and engineering design and generate energy on site from built energy projects of every services to engineering, procurement traditional or renewable sources such type and size and construction (EPC) to our power, as solar power and can guarantee energy efficiency and renewable the outcomes in all these areas. energy clients throughout the United AECOM has successfully undertaken States. numerous energy projects in the integrated past five years alone, including AECOM is built to deliver a better energy power projects for transmission world. We design, build, finance systems, substations, on-site power and operate infrastructure assets services generation, utility-scale conventional for governments, businesses and and renewable power generation for organizations in more than 150 framework clients such as Long Island Power achieves speed-to-market by countries. As a fully integrated bringing together a unique Authority, Pacific Gas and Electric, firm, we connect knowledge and combination of engineers, Noble Wind Farms, New York Power experience across our global network planners, scientists and project Authority, Los Angeles Department of experts to help clients solve managers of Water and Power, Space and their most complex challenges. Warfare System Command, NASA NASA Ames Research Center From high-performance buildings Ames Research Center, Air Force Civil Utility Energy Services Contract and infrastructure, to resilient Engineer Support Agency, California communities and environments, to capabilities AECOM partnered with Pacific State University and Solar Millennium. energy analysis and planning, Gas & Electric (PG&E) through its stable and secure nations, our work environmental management, Utility Energy Services Contract is transformative, differentiated and conceptual design, detailed (UESC). The project included vital. A Fortune 500 firm, AECOM design, engineering, 128 buildings encompassing procurement, project 2,600,000 square feet and the cost companies have an annual revenue of was $23 million. management, construction approximately management and asset US $17.4 billion. Castle Hill Houses Heating and management Lighting Upgrade

AECOM worked with New York Power Authority on the replacement of eight 350 BHP boilers that served the facility for 50 years with five new, high- efficiency 600 BHP boilers.

8 AECOM AECOM 9 Energy Efficiency Qualifications

NASA Ames Research Center Utility Energy Services Contract San Jose, California , U.S.

Project experience

AECOM's project experience ranges from energy efficiency work that saves megawatts of power at California State University campuses and transmission line upgrades in Australia, to wind farm design and construction in the United States and hydroelectric power in Laos that supplies power to Thailand. Whether we’re designing a system to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions at coal-fired plants in Canada, creating a detailed handbook to help London’s developers implement sustainable energy policies, installing a 200-kilowatt fuel cell at a Texas medical clinic or developing a turbine-generator unit at a geothermal field in West Java, AECOM strives to meet today’s global energy challenges.

NASA Ames, UESC project with PG&E Locomotive Shop Energy Systems SPAWAR System Center Pacific, San Jose, California, U.S. Site Assessment (ESSA) Energy Savings Performance Altoona, Pennsylvania, U.S. Contract, Task Orders #1-3 Salinas Valley Memorial Hospital San Diego, California, U.S. Energy Services, Sustainable Riker's Island Cogeneration Solutions Turnkey (SST) Program East Elmhurst, New York, U.S. CSU San Bernardino Comprehensive with PG&E Energy Efficiency Project Salinas, California, U.S. San Bernardino, California, U.S.

10 AECOM AECOM 11 Project Sheet www.aecom.com Project Sheet www.aecom.com

SPAWAR System Center Pacific, Energy Savings SPAWAR System Center Pacific Performance Contract, Task Orders #1-3 ESPC Delivery Task Order #4

Project Overview Project Overview “Our staff was impressed with the As part of their continued effort to meet federally mandated energy This project involved complex AECOM helped SPAWAR to be one of the first facilities to meet its quality of the work and how AECOM efficiency and water conservation goals, SPAWAR Systems Center major infrastructure upgrades federal mandates—two years ahead of schedule. has gone beyond what is expected. Pacific (SSC PAC) selected AECOM to develop and implement an Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC) of their facilities in San in sensitive occupied areas, and The fourth ESPC task order for SSC PAC addressed the work AECOM performed at a very high Diego, California. This ESPC is contracted through the Army Corps of identified in the ESPC Master Plan for its Pearl City, Hawaii, facility. level of professionalism and I’m very Engineers Support Center in Huntsville, Alabama. it was executed on time while Prior to implementation of this ESPC project, they were faced with rapidly increasing utility rates/costs, aging/failing HVAC impressed with their troubleshooting, SSC PAC is the U.S. Navy’s premier research, development, minimizing impacts to building systems and no automation system for control and monitoring communications, organization and acquisition testing and evaluation (RDAT&E), engineering and fleet planning of all aspects of the project.” support center for ocean surveillance, command and control and operations. of the HVAC systems. This project reduced the facility’s annual communication systems. SSC PAC has an extensive footprint in electrical use by 32 percent, domestic water consumption by 42 Randy Peacock, SSC PAC Facilities Director California and Hawaii, operating approximately 224 buildings with a percent and annual utility costs by 31 percent. Scope elements combined workspace of 3,032,000 square feet. Client included chilled water system and chiller plant improvements, HVAC Improvements, Building Automation and Controls (UMCS/ To help SSC PAC achieve their energy and financial goals, AECOM Space and Navy Warfare Systems Command EMCS/DDC), lighting improvements, electric motors and drives Client developed a turnkey project solution that included 100 percent Army Corp of Engineers Support Center and water and sewer systems. up-front project financing for the effort and enough energy and Location operation savings to pay for itself—the result was SSC PAC spent no The project’s scope of work included a comprehensive mix of Location Pearl City, Oahu, Hawaii, U.S. money throughout the entire process, thus preserving its own budget energy efficiency, renewable energy and water conservation San Diego, California, U.S. monies for its core operations. In fact, the project’s energy and water measures. savings were large enough to pay for a variety of other much-needed Project Size Project Size infrastructure upgrades that could not be funded from SSC PAC’s −− Replaced all exterior light fixtures with LED fixtures; replaced 225 buildings | 3,032,000 square feet 1 building | 60,000 square feet budget. all warehouse light fixtures with LED fixtures having integrated Project Cost Task Order #1: In January 2012, AECOM successfully completed the Contract Value occupancy sensor control; retrofit all interior light fixtures with high efficiency lamp/ballast solutions and de-lamping in select $38.5 million first in a series of three task orders for SSC PAC. This first task order $4.9 million of $12.3 million included comprehensive lighting; domestic water; areas Years heating, ventilation, air conditioning (HVAC); and Energy Management Years −− Upgraded chilled water (CHW) system including January 2011–June 2014 Control System upgrades throughout SSC PAC’s San Diego facilities. 60 percent increase in capacity, integration of two CHW It is anticipated to produce more than $950, 000 per year in energy July 2015–June 2016 systems into one for improved redundancy, new high- Services and operational savings. efficiency variable-speed oilless chiller, expansion of the CHW −− Facility audits Services distribution system, conversion to all variable flow pumping, all Task Order #2: In April 2013 AECOM Successfully completed the −− Energy and economic analysis −− Project development new controls with energy and performance monitoring second Task Order. This second task order of $3.8 million included −− Project design engineering −− Energy engineering −− Installed a completely new BACnet-based EMCS for control −− Utility incentive procurement comprehensive lighting; domestic water; heating, ventilation, air conditioning (HVAC); and Energy Management Control System upgrades −− Commissioning and monitoring of the HVAC systems −− Project/construction management throughout SSC PAC’s San Diego facilities. It is anticipated to produce −− Construction / project management −− Replaced DX HVAC systems with new CHW units −− Savings measurement and verification more than $950, 000 per year in energy and operational savings. −− Training and measurement and verification (M&V) −− Replaced all 11 existing air handling units with new units −− Project commissioning −− Design engineering services having variable speed fans and components selected for Task Order #3: In May 2014, AECOM successfully completed the long-life/reduced maintenance including direct drive fans and Annual Savings Results Third Task Order. This third task order of $21.3 million included Annual Savings Results stainless steel condensate pans Electrical: 29,310,978 (kWh) comprehensive lighting; domestic water; heating, ventilation, air −− Installed new HVAC systems in sensitive computer labs (e.g., Gas: 11,665 (Mbtu) conditioning (HVAC); Window Film, Demand Response and Energy Electrical savings: 1,251,172 kWh server rooms) to improve efficiency and redundancy Water: 24,587,714 (Gal) Management Control System upgrades throughout SSC PAC’s San Water savings: 473,051 Gal −− Replaced all toilets and urinals with high-efficiency fixtures Total cost savings: $7,324,078 Diego facilities. It is anticipated to produce more than $950, 000 per Total cost savings: $493,289 −− Added four new pumps, 12 new fan coils and air handling units year in energy and operational savings. Project Sheet www.aecom.com Project Sheet www.aecom.com

NASA's Ames Research Center Air Force Civil Engineer Center Sustainable Utility Energy Services Contract Infrastructure Assessment

Client Project Overview Client Project Overview NASA AMES Research Center With over $3 billion in capital equipment, 2,300 research Air Force Civil Engineer Support Center (AFCEC) AECOM was chosen by the AFCESA to provide base-wide, (PG&E UESC Project) personnel and a $600 million annual budget, NASA’s Ames investment-grade facility energy assessments for three Research Center's (ARC) economic impact is significant. Location air bases located in Europe and the United Kingdom, and Location Ames plays a critical role in virtually all NASA missions in Europe, Southeast U.S. sustainable infrastructure assessments at six bases located San Jose, California, U.S. support of America’s space and aeronautics programs. on the U.S. eastern seaboard. AECOM mobilized multiple audit teams and visited more than 730 buildings totaling Through an agreement with the Western Area Power Project Size 18,000,000 square feet. The buildings ranged from standard Project Size Administration (WAPA), ARC receives electricity at a 730 buildings, 18,000,000 square feet office space to vehicle maintenance shops, district central 128 buildings, 2,600,000 square feet very low cost―typically less than $0.06/kWh. While this plants, water plants, paint complexes, hangers and secure power agreement has significantly reduced ARC’s utility Project Cost communications facilities. Project Cost costs, it has also created a challenging environment for $6.1 million $22 million ARC to develop financially viable energy projects that are The purpose of the assessments was to help the Air Force necessary for ARC to meet federally mandated energy Services meet federally mandated goals for energy reductions by efficiency goals. To help ARC with this dilemma, AECOM developing technically and financially viable energy projects. Years −− Energy auditing partnered with PG&E through its UESC. The project Part of the field auditing effort involved use of a tablet-based January 2011–June 2014 −− Space utilization included 128 buildings and 2,600,000 sq ft and the cost data collection system to efficiently gather detailed inventory −− Energy engineering was $23 million. data and photos of electrical, mechanical and architectural Services −− Condition assessment systems, including component condition. This data was Work performed includes: −− Cost estimation −− Facility audits quality checked and provided to the Air Force for input into −− Energy and economic analysis −− Facility-wide indoor lighting upgrades (fluorescent and Annual Savings Results BUILDER. −− Project/construction management LED) −− Savings measurement −− Facility-wide outdoor lighting upgrades Energy savings: 48,180,000 kWh electricity, Each base-wide audit included: and verification −− Facility-wide hot water and steam boiler upgrades 149,200 million Btu and 67 million gallons water −− Preliminary evaluation of historical utility data including −− Project commissioning −− Replacement and upgrade of inefficient chillers with Cost savings from recommended projects: $8,405,486 consumption, costs and rate structure high-efficiency, longer life, water-cooled chillers −− Engagement with base and facility energy managers to Annual Savings Results −− Variable flow chilled water and heating water Total recommended project implementation costs: understand current facility needs and inefficiencies as Electrical: 7,600,000 kWh conversions $46,130,000 well as O&M practices Water: 15,779 kgal −− Conversion of steam heating systems to HHW systems −− On-site data collection of facility HVAC equipment, Total cost savings: $1,336,000 including retirement of aged district steam system lighting and water installations in accordance with −− Facility-wide water conservation upgrades including ASHRAE Level 2 Procedures for Commercial Building bathroom equipment, kitchen equipment and cooling Energy Audits tower systems −− Identification and development of Energy Conservation −− Facility-wide controls retro-commissioning, energy Measures (ECMs) for HVAC, lighting, water, central heating management and control system (EMCS) upgrades and cooling system and industrial operations −− Rooftop PV system at new building N232 −− Preparation of all project findings, recommendations, cost −− Expansion and upgrade of the EMCS for improved analyses and preliminary scope of work for all proposed control and visibility of energy consuming and mission measures in a final report format critical systems across the facility Project Sheet www.aecom.com Project Sheet www.aecom.com

City of San Luis Obispo Water Reclamation, Sustainable Solutions Turnkey, PG&E Program City of Huntington Beach

Client Project Overview Client Project Overview City of San Luis Obispo AECOM and Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) were selected City of Huntington Beach AECOM was chosen by the City of Huntington Beach to by the City of San Luis Obispo to implement a turn-key, perform an Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC). Client Contact design-build, energy efficiency retrofit project to improve Location This project included an evaluation of their top energy- Pam Ouellette the City’s Water Reclamation Facility by decreasing Huntington Beach, California, U.S. consuming facilities, which led to the implementation Chief Operator operating costs and reducing its greenhouse gas (GHG) of system replacements or improvements at multiple P 805-781-7241 emissions. Project Size buildings owned and occupied by the City. E [email protected] The PG&E/AECOM team worked in collaboration with the Nine buildings, 753,857 square feet List of improvements included: City for over two years to develop this comprehensive Server Room Virtualization: This energy savings measure Location retrofit program. Project Cost involved a mixture of cutting-edge software and hardware, San Luis Obispo, California, U.S. Facility improvement measures: $3 million which allowed the City to consolidate their IT services hardware that directly resulted in a 40 percent reduction in Project Cost −− Upgrade/replace the existing cogeneration system to Years use available bio-gas and to maximize cost savings the energy consumption related to IT system hardware. Construction $9,521,063 June 2011–September 2013 −− Upgrade existing Supervisory Control and Data Server Room HVAC upgrades: With the elimination of Years Acquisition (SCADA) controls to maximize energy and Services approximately 50 percent of the physical hardware related operational efficiency at the various facilities to the City’s IT services and its associated heat loads, the August 2014–September 2015 −− Replace the aging and energy-inefficient head works −− Energy auditing existing HVAC system was redesigned. Included in this −− ECO identification Annual Savings Results and solids dewatering systems with new energy- redesign was the addition of an energy-efficient cooling efficient systems −− Condition assessment system that was relocated into the physical space within Electricity: 1,080,275 kWh −− Install new RAS pumps equipped with variable- −− System design the server room, which also included a hot/cold aisle Natural gas: 29,038 therms frequency drives (VFD) and new controls −− Cost estimation conversion. A side benefit of the HVAC relocation was that Operations and maintenance: $75,749 −− Retrofit outdoor LED lighting −− Construction management the City was able to re-purpose approximately 800 sq ft to Total cost savings (include O&M): $231,749 −− Retrofit primary sludge pumps much needed office space. −− Install new high-efficiency screw press Annual Savings Results Chilled Water Plant Upgrades (Civic Center): This −− Implement aeration tank air pressure set point control Predicted annual energy savings: measure involved the consolidation of two independent improvements Electric: 454,746 kWh chilled water systems that served the Civic Center office Gas: 1,622 Therms Benefits to the client: tower and the police department. To accomplish this Total cost savings: $57,104 −− Streamlined project development and project effort, the existing chillers in the civic office tower were implementation to construction timeline and costs replaced with new high-efficiency chillers, and a piping −− Substantial annual energy and operational cost interconnection between the two sites was performed. savings To ensure proper cooling to all areas, the pumping −− Annual carbon offset exceeding 16.8 million pounds of systems were converted to variable flow throughout. In addition, optimized sequences and strategically located CO2 per year −− Offset in planned bond and CIP cost of approximately system sensors were integrated into the existing building $1,800,000 management system. There was an approximately 40 −− Replacement and/or upgrade of critical systems that percent reduction in annual cooling energy consumption have reached the end of their useful economic life for the two facilities because of this measure. −− Significant improvement in overall system efficiency and operation Case Study www.aecom.com AECOM Case Study www.aecom.com

Rikers Island Cogeneration Facility

Project Overview −− Natural Gas Plant Power Plant Scope: The project −− In addition to monitoring and control of new CHP includes the installation of two modular 7.5 MW equipment, the plant was designed to analyze fuel and This initiative established a The New York City Department of Corrections (NYCDOC) gas turbine generators and Heat Recovery Steam steam loads in the old powerhouse in order to properly combined heat and power facility retained the services of NYPA/AECOM to evaluate building Generators with supplemental firing that provide the integrate the output of the new Combustion Turbine a reliable, energy efficient cogeneration facility on Rikers prime source of electrical and thermal energy to the Generators. All new breaker statuses and protective on the island that reduced annual Island. This initiative established a combined heat and island, while maintaining a synchronized connection to relaying conditions are also constantly monitored energy costs and emissions to the power facility on the island that reduced annual energy the utility grid so that the utility can supplement locally and remotely at the Con Ed Utility control center costs, and emissions to the environment and improved Rikers Island’s electrical load as conditions warrant. environment. energy reliability, thereby enhancing security on Rikers −− Desired Experience | Higher Rating Evaluation Criteria Island. The project also included a future option for a −− Medium Voltage Scope: Rikers Island was supplied with – Integration of microgrid controls with diverse energy centralized emergency generation plant that improved electrical power from Con Edison’s utility grid system generation sources, such as intermittent renewable Client existing emergency generation on Rikers Island and via four main 26.4 kV electrical feeders. energy with diesel and natural gas generators: In addition to the true “island” mode of operation, the New York Power Authority reduced annual maintenance costs. −− The existing system was designed so that only two plant operates in parallel with the utility and can Randy Solomon of the four feeders are required to supply the island The Rikers Island project includes a Natural Gas Turbine produce approximately 16.5 mW during cold weather. 123 Main Street, White Plains, New York 10606 with 100 percent of its required power. Gas turbine Power Plant nominally rated at 5 kilovolt (kV) and 26.5 Island loads range from 12 to 24 mW seasonally. P 914-390-8205 generator voltage output is 5 kV and is stepped up to kV Medium Voltage Electrical Distribution System, high Individual substation loads (11 in total) are summed 27.5 kV via four Generator Step-Up Transformers. A 27 pressure gas compression station, and a Controls Room, and are wirelessly transmitted to the CHP control room Location kV utility substation is included in project. Scope also as well as controls experience including integration of import/export controller and turbine output(s) are New York, New York, U.S. included, ductbanks, manholes, switchgear, all required controls with an existing ICS and implementation of a new adjusted accordingly. At no time is power exported to microgrid controls system. AECOM completed this project protective relaying and cabling. Project Size the utility. as both the prime contractor and lead design/engineering −− Data Center, Operations Center, or Control Room The combined cycle efficiency of this plant is significantly >15 MW Electric, >80,000 #/hr steam firm under two separate contracts. Scope: The project featured a complete control room higher than the individual efficiencies of the past energy equipped with CPUs and monitors from Solar Turbines, sources serving Rikers Island. The operation of this plant Contract Value Project Scope Emerson Delta V Balance of Plant, Feeder Distribution also produced a significant reduction in CO2 and NOx $108 million −− The electrical microgrid scope consisted of revamping Mimic Panel, kW import control panel and remote emissions to the environment. existing Rikers Island 26.5 kV feeder systems and manual/auto synch panel. Years loads. Utility grade feeder isolation devices installed September 2011-January 2015 resulted in the entire system complying with all utility required mandates. The system can operate in a true Services Performed island mode in case of faults or complete failures detected on the larger utility grid as well as the ability −− Planning and scoping to take individual load banks offline and coordinate −− Feasibility studies them with the cogeneration and other sources. Well- −− Alternatives analysis defined and utility-approved procedures are in place −− Design and construction for islanding from the grid in preparation for any −− Commissioning anticipated extended outages. Annual Savings Results Cost Savings: $7.1 million

Reduction of 25,000 tons in CO2 emissions Reduction of 45 tons a year in NOx emissions

AECOM AECOM Case Study www.aecom.com Project Sheet www.aecom.com

Owls Head Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) Upgrades Sutter Health SST Project

Estimated Annual Savings Project Overview The project contained specific Cost Savings: $1 Million The project was implemented xxxThrough a competitive process, Sutter Health selected system upgrades to the fuel Electrical: 13,639,000 kWh PG&E/AECOM to develop and implement a comprehensive Gas: 46,536 MMBTU in four phases and addressed a design-build energy retrofit project that would significantly gas supply system to reduce variety of energy efficiency, water reduce Sutter Health’s California Pacific Medical Centers Greenhouse Gas (GHG) air Project Overview conservation and operational (CPMC) annual energy and operating costs, exceed their AECOM has provided engineering services at the Owls corporate mandated energy and water conservation emissions, improve operating Head WWTP since the early 1970s. At that time, the upgrades. goals, and address significant infrastructure needs. reliability, and reliance on Owls Head WWTP was a 160 MGD modified aeration This comprehensive project included significant work at plant constructed in 1952. Under the Clean Water Act, purchased electrical power. Client Sutter’s four (4) CPMC facilities located in downtown San New York City (NYC) was required to upgrade the facility Francisco. The project was implemented in four phases to meet more stringent waste standards. AECOM was Sutter Health and addressed a variety of energy efficiency, water Client commissioned to lead the conversion of the existing Wayne Bader, Energy Manager conservation, and operational upgrades. facility to a 120 MGD conventional activated sludge 2800 Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 250 New York Power Authority facility. Services included feasibility studies, planning Sacramento, California 95833 The project’s scope of work included a comprehensive Andrew Kittel, Plant Superintendent construction phases, development of preliminary designs, P 916-614 2480 portfolio of cost effective solutions that met Sutter 6700 Shore Road, Brooklyn, New York 11220 preparation of construction bidding packages, design Health’s stringent simple payback criteria of 3.5 year. P 718-748-3177 services during construction (DSDC), construction Location E [email protected] Work Performed management, construction permitting assistance, and San Francisco, California, U.S. preparation of Operation and Maintenance (O&M) manuals. −− Facility-wide indoor lighting upgrades including Location fluorescent and LED technologies AECOM was appointed by the New York Power Authority Contract Value Brooklyn, New York, U.S. −− Air Handling Unit (AHU) Variable Air Volume (VAV) (NYPA) to conduct the feasibility study, project design, and USD $4,125,000 retrofits and system optimization construction management plan to upgrade the existing Project Size −− Upgrade and replacement of aging steam system fuel gas system at the Owls Head WWTP. The project also Years infrastructure 120 MGD required AECOM to determine necessary modifications February 2014–July 2015 −− Optimization of chilled and hot water plants that allowed for improved long-term operation of the −− Retro-commissioning of HVAC, lighting, and process Contract Value three engine-generators. The project contained specific Project Size: systems at each facility $38 million system upgrades to the fuel gas supply system to reduce 4 hospitals | 3.9M square feet −− Measurement and Verification (M&V) Greenhouse Gas (GHG) air emissions, improve operating −− Utility incentive procurement Years reliability, and reliance on purchased electrical power. This Guaranteed Annual Savings: November 2011-October 2017 (estimated) project upgraded the continuous-duty engine generators while maintaining uninterrupted plant operations. Upon −− Electrical Savings: 2,171,992 kWh Services Performed completion of the project, when required, the Owls Head −− Natural Gas: 384,982 therms WWTP can operate independently from the primary power −− Water: 24,638,482 gal −− Feasibility Study grid. −− Cost Savings: $1,076,031 −− Economic Analysis −− Peak-Load Reduction Strategies −− Water and Wastewater Services −− Three Engine Generator Improvements

AECOM Project Sheet www.aecom.com

Norfolk Southern Railway, Energy Systems Site Assessment (ESSA) AECOM is built to deliver a better world. We design, build, finance and operate infrastructure assets for government, businesses and organizations in more Client Project Overview than 150 countries. As a fully integrated Norfolk Southern Railway This Class 1 Railroad client faced a significant infrastructure firm, we connect knowledge and investment in the existing systems at a locomotive shop Location and chose to develop a solution that would provide a return experience across our global network of Altoona, Pennsylvania, U.S. on investment in the form of lower energy and operational costs. AECOM was engaged to perform an Energy Systems experts to help clients solve their most Project Cost Site Assessment (ESSA) with the primary focus on retiring complex challenges. a coal-fired steam plant and developing alternate heating Energy audit fees $240,000 solutions for the 20+ buildings currently heated by steam. In Design fees through 2014 $922,000 addition to the steam system assessment, AECOM performed Our projects have set new standards Years a condition assessment of the complex electrical and building for industry-wide best practices. This envelope infrastructure and developed recommendations April 2014–December 2015 for improving reliability and performance of this critical success is due to our dependable, infrastructure. A key component of the study was to investigate the opportunity for Combined Heat and Power trustworthy, responsible consulting (CHP) at the complex. practices; the relationships we build with The ESSA recommendations included (i) a coal plant retirement plan, including direct gas-fired heating our clients; and our ability to understand solutions for all buildings currently heated with steam, with destratification technologies and improved controls to their needs. manage ventilation needs; (ii) window replacements and roof and wall insulation improvements; (iii) upgrade of key electrical distribution infrastructure to increase safety and reliability and support the installation of a CHP system; (iv) selection of a gas engine CHP system to provide on-site electricity, hot water and steam; and (v) space utilization recommendations including the demolition of under-utilized buildings and relocation of activities to other buildings. The $48 million project eliminated the combustion of approximately 13,531 tons of coal annually. Converting the building heating from steam to gas reduced water consumption by approximately 50 million gallons of water annually. Accounting for future avoided replacement costs, which were used to offset the cost of non-energy related scope items (i.e., electrical and envelope recommendations that must be implemented to ensure safety and reliability), the project had a simple payback of approximately five years.

AECOM 23 About AECOM AECOM is built to deliver a better world. We design, build, finance and operate infrastructure assets for governments, businesses and organizations in more than 150 countries. As a fully integrated firm, we connect knowledge and experience across our global network of experts to help clients solve their most complex challenges. From high-performance buildings and infrastructure, to resilient communities and environments, to stable and secure nations, our work is transformative, differentiated and vital. A Fortune 500 firm, AECOM had revenue of approximately $17.4 billion during fiscal year 2016. See how we deliver what others can only imagine at aecom.com and @AECOM.

For more information contact:

Annika Moman Power and Energy Services Business Lead 3101 Wilson Blvd, Suite 900 Arlington, VA 22201 P 703-682-9072 M 760-533-1492 E [email protected]