On the Authority in the Church: Yves Congarâ•Žs Vision of Collegiality In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

On the Authority in the Church: Yves Congarâ•Žs Vision of Collegiality In Santa Clara University Scholar Commons Jesuit School of Theology Dissertations Student Scholarship 5-2018 On the Authority in the Church: Yves Congar’s Vision of Collegiality in Evangelizing Secularity Pius Youn Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/jst_dissertations Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Youn, Pius, "On the Authority in the Church: Yves Congar’s Vision of Collegiality in Evangelizing Secularity" (2018). Jesuit School of Theology Dissertations. 34. https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/jst_dissertations/34 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Jesuit School of Theology Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ON THE AUTHORITY IN THE CHURCH: YVES CONGAR’S VISION OF COLLEGIALITY IN EVANGELIZING SECULARITY A thesis by Pius Youn, O.P. presented to The Faculty of the Jesuit School of Theology of Santa Clara University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Licentiate in Sacred Theology Berkeley, California May 2018 Committee Signatures _________________________________________________ Anh Q. Tran, S.J., Ph.D., Director Date _________________________________________________ Hilary Martin, O.P., Ph.D., Reader Date _________________________________________________ Michael Sweeney, O.P., M.Div., Reader Date To my parents, Sok-Hoe Joseph and Sang-Woo Gina Youn from whom I received the Catholic faith and to Fr. John P. McGuire, O.P. who saved my faith in college ii CONTENTS ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................. vi ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................................... vii INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 Chapter 1: Evangelization of Secularity by Diversity of Ministry ......................................7 1.1 Tension between Greco-Roman and Enlightenment Cultures ...........................7 1.2 Secular Dimension to the Church ....................................................................15 1.3 Chapter Summary ............................................................................................18 Chapter 2: Authority of the Priesthood in the Church .......................................................20 2.1 Inward Sacrificial Priesthood of the People of God ........................................20 2.2 Distinction between Common and Ministerial Priesthood ..............................24 2.3 Lay Ecclesial Office .........................................................................................33 2.4 Chapter Summary ............................................................................................38 Chapter 3: Ecclesial Exercise of Authority ........................................................................40 3.1 Transmission of Faith ......................................................................................40 3.2 The Office of Bishops ......................................................................................44 3.3 Ecclesial Structure ...........................................................................................52 3.4 Chapter Summary ............................................................................................57 Chapter 4: Reform and Collegiality ...................................................................................58 4.1 Reform in the Church.......................................................................................59 4.2 Collegiality and Reform ...................................................................................66 4.3 Chapter Summary ............................................................................................78 CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................80 BIBLIOGRAPHY ..............................................................................................................84 iii ABSTRACT In the public sphere of contemporary Western society, its post-Enlightenment culture is secular at large. Encouraged by the principle of equality upon which the United States of America was founded, the current culture promotes a subjective and individual mindset, which demands that everyone, regardless of gender, race, or class, possess equal representation in all fields of duty. Against this individualistic egalitarianism, the Church can seem to lag behind the times because she operates from a different model than that of modern society. While most societies in the West espouse a democratic culture and representative participation at every level of governance, the Church seems to continue the hierarchical model of the past in its operation. Yet, is it true to state that the Church is “hierarchical?” If so, what does that entail? With an ongoing tension between the Church and secularity, a genuine discussion is necessary to mend the challenges and misunderstandings. While the secular society, at times, promotes ideologies that contradict church teachings, there also is a secular dimension to the Church. In this sense, church and society are not against each another; rather, she is found within society carrying out her tasks in the temporal order. As such, the lay people who share in the priestly, prophetic, and kingly offices by the virtue of their baptism have a particular vocation to evangelize secularity. More precisely, they are secular and they encounter secularity in their daily life. With the authority that they hold in the Church, they bring Christ to those who they encounter daily. The Church, in this light, is within the culture at large. iv The secular dimension of the Church can flourish if the authorities within the Church work in a collegial manner. In other words, the lay people must have a genuine dialogue with the magisterium and theologians so that the truths of the faith will influence secularity. Collegiality, however, should not be mistaken for democracy. While it is understandable that Americans, who are used to democratic structures, may push for more participation by disregarding her teachings, the nature of the Church is more complex than a mere political system. This thesis acknowledges the proper authority which is given to each group within the Church, both in the sacraments and in jurisdiction. The ongoing conversation in the thesis treats the nature, leadership, and authority of the Church that is scriptural and traditional. The ideas contained in the works of Yves Congar will ultimately help in resolving the challenges that the Church face today. By speaking about his perception of authority that is given to every individual in the Church, this thesis clarifies for the readers the proper function of priests, bishops, and laity, functions which, in the past, have been overly confused and even abused. As a result, the resolution of current challenges will encourage the entire People of God to live out pastorally the sacramental and juridical functions that they hold. v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to first thank Anh Tran, S.J. for helping me throughout the STL program. Writing the thesis before the priestly ordination can be somewhat agonizing due to the mind floating around in various places, yet he disciplined me well in finishing the task diligently and without anxiety. I would also like to thank Hilary Martin, O.P. and Michael Sweeney, O.P., the readers of the thesis. Intellectual conversations about the Church at St. Albert’s Priory in Oakland, especially during recreation, helped me tremendously in understanding the prevalent thoughts of the contemporary culture and of the history of the Church. By speaking to them, I learned how to do theology in consideration of the contemporary secular culture. vi ABBREVIATIONS AA Apostolicam Actuositatem AL Amoris Laetitia AP Aeterni Patris CCC Catechism of the Catholic Church CIC Corpus iuris canonici (1983 Code of Canon Law) CL Christifideles Laici DV Dei Verbum GS Gaudium et Spes II Inter Insigniores Jn John LG Lumen Gentium LS Laudato Si Lk Luke MD Mediator Dei Mt Matthew PO Presbyterorum Ordinis PT Pacem et Terris RM Redemptoris Missio SC Sacrosanctum Concilium ST Summa Theologica Thess Thessalonians vii Introduction Yves Congar (1904-1995), a French Dominican, ecclesiologist and ministerial priest, understood the “signs of the times” in which he was writing. During his lifetime, he influenced the Church by writing about an ecclesial structure that is collegial, that is reformed in such a way as to promote a healthy balance of authority, and that allows the laity to exercise their authority in the Church. He was highly aware of the fact that secular Western culture seeks a democratic mindset which encourages authentic criticism of institutions. As a churchman and as a theologian, how did he resolve the difference between the values of the post-Enlightenment West, especially with its radical approach to individualism, and of the Church? With regard to sacraments, jurisdiction, and morality, there are various functions of authority in the Church. For instance, the Constitution of Vatican II on sacred liturgy, Sacrosanctum Concilium,
Recommended publications
  • One Hundred Years of Thomism Aeterni Patris and Afterwards a Symposium
    One Hundred Years of Thomism Aeterni Patris and Afterwards A Symposium Edited By Victor B. Brezik, C.S.B, CENTER FOR THOMISTIC STUDIES University of St. Thomas Houston, Texas 77006 ~ NIHIL OBSTAT: ReverendJamesK. Contents Farge, C.S.B. Censor Deputatus INTRODUCTION . 1 IMPRIMATUR: LOOKING AT THE PAST . 5 Most Reverend John L. Morkovsky, S.T.D. A Remembrance Of Pope Leo XIII: The Encyclical Aeterni Patris, Leonard E. Boyle,O.P. 7 Bishop of Galveston-Houston Commentary, James A. Weisheipl, O.P. ..23 January 6, 1981 The Legacy Of Etienne Gilson, Armand A. Maurer,C.S.B . .28 The Legacy Of Jacques Maritain, Christian Philosopher, First Printing: April 1981 Donald A. Gallagher. .45 LOOKING AT THE PRESENT. .61 Copyright©1981 by The Center For Thomistic Studies Reflections On Christian Philosophy, All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or Ralph McInerny . .63 reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written Thomism And Today's Crisis In Moral Values, Michael permission, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in Bertram Crowe . .74 critical articles and reviews. For information, write to The Transcendental Thomism, A Critical Assessment, Center For Thomistic Studies, 3812 Montrose Boulevard, Robert J. Henle, S.J. 90 Houston, Texas 77006. LOOKING AT THE FUTURE. .117 Library of Congress catalog card number: 80-70377 Can St. Thomas Speak To The Modem World?, Leo Sweeney, S.J. .119 The Future Of Thomistic Metaphysics, ISBN 0-9605456-0-3 Joseph Owens, C.Ss.R. .142 EPILOGUE. .163 The New Center And The Intellectualism Of St. Thomas, Printed in the United States of America Vernon J.
    [Show full text]
  • YVES CONGAR's THEOLOGY of LAITY and MINISTRIES and ITS THEOLOGICAL RECEPTION in the UNITED STATES Dissertation Submitted to Th
    YVES CONGAR’S THEOLOGY OF LAITY AND MINISTRIES AND ITS THEOLOGICAL RECEPTION IN THE UNITED STATES Dissertation Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology By Alan D. Mostrom UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON Dayton, Ohio December 2018 YVES CONGAR’S THEOLOGY OF LAITY AND MINISTRIES AND ITS THEOLOGICAL RECEPTION IN THE UNITED STATES Name: Mostrom, Alan D. APPROVED BY: ___________________________________________ William L. Portier, Ph.D. Faculty Advisor ___________________________________________ Sandra A. Yocum, Ph.D. Faculty Reader ___________________________________________ Timothy R. Gabrielli, Ph.D. Outside Faculty Reader, Seton Hill University ___________________________________________ Dennis M. Doyle, Ph.D. Faculty Reader ___________________________________________ William H. Johnston, Ph.D. Faculty Reader ___________________________________________ Daniel S. Thompson, Ph.D. Chairperson ii © Copyright by Alan D. Mostrom All rights reserved 2018 iii ABSTRACT YVES CONGAR’S THEOLOGY OF LAITY AND MINISTRIES AND ITS THEOLOGICAL RECEPTION IN THE UNITED STATES Name: Mostrom, Alan D. University of Dayton Advisor: William L. Portier, Ph.D. Yves Congar’s theology of the laity and ministries is unified on the basis of his adaptation of Christ’s triplex munera to the laity and his specification of ministry as one aspect of the laity’s participation in Christ’s triplex munera. The seminal insight of Congar’s adaptation of the triplex munera is illumined by situating his work within his historical and ecclesiological context. The U.S. reception of Congar’s work on the laity and ministries, however, evinces that Congar’s principle insight has received a mixed reception by Catholic theologians in the United States due to their own historical context as well as their specific constructive theological concerns over the laity’s secularity, or the priority given to lay ministry over the notion of a laity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pre-History of Subsidiarity in Leo XIII
    Journal of Catholic Legal Studies Volume 56 Number 1 Article 5 The Pre-History of Subsidiarity in Leo XIII Michael P. Moreland Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/jcls This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Catholic Legal Studies by an authorized editor of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FINAL_MORELAND 8/14/2018 9:10 PM THE PRE-HISTORY OF SUBSIDIARITY IN LEO XIII MICHAEL P. MORELAND† Christian Legal Thought is a much-anticipated contribution from Patrick Brennan and William Brewbaker that brings the resources of the Christian intellectual tradition to bear on law and legal education. Among its many strengths, the book deftly combines Catholic and Protestant contributions and scholarly material with more widely accessible sources such as sermons and newspaper columns. But no project aiming at a crisp and manageably-sized presentation of Christianity’s contribution to law could hope to offer a comprehensive treatment of particular themes. And so, in this brief essay, I seek to elaborate upon the treatment of the principle of subsidiarity in Catholic social thought. Subsidiarity is mentioned a handful of times in Christian Legal Thought, most squarely with a lengthy quotation from Pius XI’s articulation of the principle in Quadragesimo Anno.1 In this proposed elaboration of subsidiarity, I wish to broaden the discussion of subsidiarity historically (back a few decades from Quadragesimo Anno to the pontificate of Leo XIII) and philosophically (most especially its relation to Leo XIII’s revival of Thomism).2 Statements of the principle have historically been terse and straightforward even if the application of subsidiarity to particular legal questions has not.
    [Show full text]
  • The Catholic Intellectual Tradition Scholarship, Faith, and Higher Education
    ISSN 1941-8450 Journal of Religion & Society Supplement Series The Kripke Center Supplement 6 (2011) The Catholic Intellectual Tradition Scholarship, Faith, and Higher Education Edited by John J. O’Keefe, Gina Merys, and Bridget Keegan The Catholic Intellectual Tradition Medieval Lessons Frederick Christian Bauerschmidt, Loyola University Maryland Introduction [1] Whatever else a tradition is, it is something that connects us to a past, and not simply to a past fondly remembered, but one that continues to inform our present. So it seems not implausible that we might look to the past in order to gain insight into what it means to be engaged in the Catholic Intellectual Tradition today. And because Catholicism seems, for good or for ill, to have a particular connection to the Middle Ages – the “Age of Faith” – we might look to that particular past to see what lessons we can learn about what we mean when we speak of a Catholic Intellectual Tradition, about what challenges are posed to and posed by this tradition, and about how we foster and further this tradition. I will proceed by first making and exploring a distinction, and then proposing some points for consideration. 10 The Catholic Intellectual Tradition [2] Medieval scholastic thought proceeded largely by the making of distinctions, and thus it would warm the heart of our scholastic forbears if we begin with a distinction. I suggest we might distinguish between what we mean materially by the Catholic Intellectual Tradition, and what we mean formally. In other words, when we speak “materially” about the Catholic Intellectual Tradition, we mean those texts, works of art, figures, concepts, and so forth that are indispensable in preservation, transmission, and extension of that tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaderni Di DC Layout 1 09/06/20 12:49 Pagina 9
    Quaderni di DC_Layout 1 09/06/20 12:49 Pagina 9 Introduzione La Pontificia Accademia di San Tommaso d’Aquino è stata fondata il 15 ottobre 1879 da papa Leone XIII1, poche settimane dopo la pro- mulgazione della storica enciclica Aeterni Patris (4 agosto 1879) sulla filosofia cristiana, in cui il Santo Padre proponeva san Tommaso d’Aquino quale modello del modo autenticamente cristiano di filo- sofare ed esortava «a rimettere in uso la sacra dottrina di San Tom- maso e a propagarla il più largamente possibile, a tutela e ad onore della fede cattolica, per il bene della società, e ad incremento di tut- te le scienze». Pur non essendo un inizio assoluto – sfruttava i primi frutti del rinnovamento tomista già iniziato dalla metà del dicianno- vesimo secolo2 –, l’Aeterni Patris segna nondimeno l’inizio di una nuova epoca del tomismo, a volte qualificata come neotomismo o come terza scolastica3. La storia di questo movimento intellettuale è stata accompagna- ta sin dall’inizio dalla Pontificia Accademia di San Tommaso d’Aqui- no. Molti dei suoi membri ne sono stati protagonisti di primo piano 1 Sulla storia della Pontificia Accademia di san Tommaso d’Aquino, si veda D. BERGER, In dulcedine societatis quaerere veritatem. Zur Geschichte der Päpstlichen Akademie des hl. Thomas von Aquin, “Doctor Angelicus” 2 (2002), 135-180; ID., In der Schule des hl. Thomas von Aquin. Studien zur Geschichte des Thomismus, Nova & Vetera, Bonn 2005, 121-181; A. LOBATO, The Pontifical Academy of St. Thomas Aquinas: History and Mission, “Anuario filosofico” 39 (2006) 2, 309-327. 2 Nell’Aeterni Patris, Leone XIII si riferisce a questo primo rinnovamento del to- mismo: «Con ottima decisione dunque non pochi cultori delle scienze filosofiche, avendo recentemente applicato l’animo a restaurare con profitto la filosofia, attese- ro ed attendono a far rivivere e ritornare nel primitivo splendore la dottrina di San Tommaso d’Aquino».
    [Show full text]
  • Six Ways Theology Uses Philosophy
    Six Ways Theology The Context Since I teach philosophy to seminarians,the UsesPhilosophy questionwhich is often raisedis "how is philosophy used by theology?" My answers,at first, did not David Foster. Ph.D. move pastthe generalitiesthat philosophy is the in- strumentof theologyor that philosophytaught you to Yote: This paper wasfirst presentedin Venice,April, 1996 at think logically. Realizing the inadequacyof those 'he International Conferenceon Preparation for Priesthood answers,I began to study the relationship. with the support of the Wethersfield Institute. As a result,this paperaims to describein betterr detail how theology usesphilosophy. Its main con- tributionsare 1) a descriptionof the instrumentaluses of philosophy,2) the identification of the intrinsic role of philosophy as material to theology. Becauseof the focus on the theologicaluses of philosophy,I will leave aside other contributionsof philosophyto theology students,such as, helping them to understandthe modern world, disciplining their thinking, stimulatingcreative thought, and providing order for a complex world. These contributions of philosophyare important, but are not unique to the- ology. The Traditional Ways Theology UsesPhilosophy Four main uses quickly emergedas a working hypothesis:philosophy serves theology as a preamble, a tool, a bridge, and a shield.2 Theseare the more traditional ways of describing how theology uses philosophy.The list eventually grew to six. Philosophyis a preamblein thatit preparespeople for understandingthe Faith. It is a tool in that it is usedas an instrumentto better understandthe Faith. It is a bridge in that it provides common principles where believer and nonbeliever can meet. It is a shieldin thatit can be usedto defendthe Faith against argumentsof nonbelievers3.The seconduse, as a tool, is the most commonand the most importantto articulatefor theologystudents.
    [Show full text]
  • Solidarity and Mediation in the French Stream Of
    SOLIDARITY AND MEDIATION IN THE FRENCH STREAM OF MYSTICAL BODY OF CHRIST THEOLOGY Dissertation Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Theology By Timothy R. Gabrielli Dayton, Ohio December 2014 SOLIDARITY AND MEDIATION IN THE FRENCH STREAM OF MYSTICAL BODY OF CHRIST THEOLOGY Name: Gabrielli, Timothy R. APPROVED BY: _________________________________________ William L. Portier, Ph.D. Faculty Advisor _________________________________________ Dennis M. Doyle, Ph.D. Faculty Reader _________________________________________ Anthony J. Godzieba, Ph.D. Outside Faculty Reader _________________________________________ Vincent J. Miller, Ph.D. Faculty Reader _________________________________________ Sandra A. Yocum, Ph.D. Faculty Reader _________________________________________ Daniel S. Thompson, Ph.D. Chairperson ii © Copyright by Timothy R. Gabrielli All rights reserved 2014 iii ABSTRACT SOLIDARITY MEDIATION IN THE FRENCH STREAM OF MYSTICAL BODY OF CHRIST THEOLOGY Name: Gabrielli, Timothy R. University of Dayton Advisor: William L. Portier, Ph.D. In its analysis of mystical body of Christ theology in the twentieth century, this dissertation identifies three major streams of mystical body theology operative in the early part of the century: the Roman, the German-Romantic, and the French-Social- Liturgical. Delineating these three streams of mystical body theology sheds light on the diversity of scholarly positions concerning the heritage of mystical body theology, on its mid twentieth-century recession, as well as on Pope Pius XII’s 1943 encyclical, Mystici Corporis Christi, which enshrined “mystical body of Christ” in Catholic magisterial teaching. Further, it links the work of Virgil Michel and Louis-Marie Chauvet, two scholars remote from each other on several fronts, in the long, winding French stream.
    [Show full text]
  • MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY NEO-THOMIST APPROACHES to MODERN PSYCHOLOGY Dissertation Submitted to the College of Arts and Sciences Of
    MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY NEO-THOMIST APPROACHES TO MODERN PSYCHOLOGY Dissertation Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology By Matthew Glen Minix UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON Dayton, Ohio December 2016 MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY NEO-THOMIST APPROACHES TO MODERN PSYCHOLOGY Name: Minix, Matthew G. APPROVED BY: _____________________________________ Sandra A. Yocum, Ph.D. Dissertation Director _____________________________________ William L. Portier, Ph.D. Dissertation Reader. _____________________________________ Anthony Burke Smith, Ph.D. Dissertation Reader _____________________________________ John A. Inglis, Ph.D. Dissertation Reader _____________________________________ Jack J. Bauer, Ph.D. _____________________________________ Daniel Speed Thompson, Ph.D. Chair, Department of Religious Studies ii © Copyright by Matthew Glen Minix All rights reserved 2016 iii ABSTRACT MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY NEO-THOMIST APPROACHES TO MODERN PSYCHOLOGY Name: Minix, Matthew Glen University of Dayton Advisor: Dr. Sandra A. Yocum This dissertation considers a spectrum of five distinct approaches that mid-twentieth century neo-Thomist Catholic thinkers utilized when engaging with the tradition of modern scientific psychology: a critical approach, a reformulation approach, a synthetic approach, a particular [Jungian] approach, and a personalist approach. This work argues that mid-twentieth century neo-Thomists were essentially united in their concerns about the metaphysical principles of many modern psychologists as well as in their worries that these same modern psychologists had a tendency to overlook the transcendent dimension of human existence. This work shows that the first four neo-Thomist thinkers failed to bring the traditions of neo-Thomism and modern psychology together to the extent that they suggested purely theoretical ways of reconciling them.
    [Show full text]
  • Cuadernos Doctorales Separata
    ISSN: 0214-6827 EXCERPTA E DISSERTATIONIBUS IN SACRA THEOLOGIA cuadernos doctorales DE LA Facultad DE teologÍA PUBLICACIÓN PERIÓDICA DE LA FACULTAD DE TEOLOGÍA UNIVERSIDAD DE NAVARRA / PAMPLONA / ESPAÑA JAMES PATRICK HURLEY Newman and Twentieth- Centro, unidad o servicio de primer nivel Century French Theology Centro, unidad o servicio de primer nivel The presence of J. H. Newman Centro, unidad o servicio de segundo nivel in Y. M.Congar, H. de Lubac and J. Daniélou VoluMEN 61 / 2014 separata Contenido Presentation 7 Index of the Thesis 11 Bibliography of the Thesis 15 Universidad de Navarra The presence of J. H. Newman in Y. M. Congar, Facultad de Teología H. de Lubac and J. Daniélou 25 I. YVES-MARIE CONGAR 25 1.1. Newman and Congar: prophet and peritus of the Second Vatican Council 25 1.2. Development of doctrine 30 1.3. Tradition and traditions 33 1.4. The significance of Pensées sur l’Église 42 James Patrick HURLEY II. HENRI DE LUBAC 43 2.1. De Lubac and Newman: a comparison of profiles 43 2.2. Ecclesiology 44 Newman and Twentieth-Century 2.3. Interpretation of Scripture 51 2.4. Natural religion and supernatural religion 55 French Theology 2.5. Autobiographical 58 III. JEAN DANIÉLOU 60 The presence of J. H. Newman in Y. M. Congar, 3.1. Daniélou and Newman: a comparison of profiles 60 H. de Lubac and J. Daniélou 3.2. Daniélou’s writings 62 3.3. Relationship with Jean Honoré 65 IV. NEWMAN AND THE COUNCIL PERITI 66 4.1. Yves-Marie Congar 66 4.2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contribution of Yves Congar's Theology of The
    Theological Studies 62 (2001) THE CONTRIBUTION OF YVES CONGAR’S THEOLOGY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT ELIZABETH TERESA GROPPE [The author highlights one of the primary contributions of Yves Congar’s pneumatology. In contrast to early-20th-century Roman Catholic theology that divorced reflection on the indwelling of the Holy Spirit in the human person from a systematic ecclesiology, Congar developed a theology of personal indwelling that was in- separable from a theology of the Church. The author then illustrates the fruitfulness of Congar’s approach by using his theology con- structively to address the postconciliar discussion as to whether the Catholic Church is a hierarchy or a democracy.] RENCH DOMINICAN YVES CONGAR (1904–1995) expressed a desire to be F an Aeolian harp upon which the Spirit of God would blow, releasing harmonious melodies.1 His life of dedicated prayer, service, and scholar- ship were all signs of his fidelity to this calling. Indeed, Congar was not only an instrument of the Spirit of God, but also a theologian of the Spirit. Years before pneumatology became a prominent topic in Roman Catholic the- ology, he was addressing the theology of the Holy Spirit in many of his books and articles.2 This work culminated in the three volume I Believe in the Holy Spirit and the subsequent monograph The Word and the Spirit.3 Congar believed that it is more important to live in the Spirit than to try to ELIZABETH TERESA GROPPE is assistant professor of systematic theology at Xavier University, Cincinnati, Ohio. She received her Ph.D. in theology from the Univer- sity of Notre Dame.
    [Show full text]
  • Expulsion from the Senate of the Roman Republic, C.319–50 BC
    Ex senatu eiecti sunt: Expulsion from the Senate of the Roman Republic, c.319–50 BC Lee Christopher MOORE University College London (UCL) PhD, 2013 1 Declaration I, Lee Christopher MOORE, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 2 Thesis abstract One of the major duties performed by the censors of the Roman Republic was that of the lectio senatus, the enrolment of the Senate. As part of this process they were able to expel from that body anyone whom they deemed unequal to the honour of continued membership. Those expelled were termed ‘praeteriti’. While various aspects of this important and at-times controversial process have attracted scholarly attention, a detailed survey has never been attempted. The work is divided into two major parts. Part I comprises four chapters relating to various aspects of the lectio. Chapter 1 sees a close analysis of the term ‘praeteritus’, shedding fresh light on senatorial demographics and turnover – primarily a demonstration of the correctness of the (minority) view that as early as the third century the quaestorship conveyed automatic membership of the Senate to those who held it. It was not a Sullan innovation. In Ch.2 we calculate that during the period under investigation, c.350 members were expelled. When factoring for life expectancy, this translates to a significant mean lifetime risk of expulsion: c.10%. Also, that mean risk was front-loaded, with praetorians and consulars significantly less likely to be expelled than subpraetorian members.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Religion
    4 Roman Religion 1. “By pietas and fides the Romans Reached TheiR PResent eminence” the strength of Rome rested on a number of foundations. Among these were its extraordinarily vital political culture and its capacity to sustain warfare for extended periods of time. Previous chapters have emphasized these features, but in this chapter and the next, focus shifts to less obvious sources of Rome’s strength, namely the special character of its society whose dual foundations were the household and the civic religion of the city. Roman Religiosity during the period of the Republic, outsiders were struck by the religiosity of the Romans. In the second century b.c., Polybius, a Greek statesman and historian who lived much of his adult life in Rome, claimed that it was “scrupulous fear of the gods that kept the Roman commonwealth together” (6.56). A century or so later another expatriate Greek, Dionysius of Halicarnassus, was also impressed by the concern of Romans for religion. Writing about the second king of Rome, dionysius noted that as a result of Numa’s activities, Rome possessed more religious observances than any other city “Greek or non-Greek, even among those who thought of themselves as most god- fearing” (2.63). Needless to say, Romans themselves promoted the belief that fidelity to their oaths and treaties and their general reverence for the gods explained their imperial success. “the gods look kindly on these qualities, for it was by pietas and fides that Romans reached their present eminence” declared the consul Q. Marcius Philippus in 169 b.c.
    [Show full text]