DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix E Baseline Survey 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix E Baseline Survey 2009 Appendix E Baseline Survey 2009 Rumah Baru Freight and Passenger Terminal Baseline Survey 2009 April 2009 P:\VDMGroup\782_RumahBaruEMP\003_BaselineSurvey\Reports\Baseline Report\FINAL_baseline_20090402.doc Rumah Baru Freight and Passenger Terminal Baseline Survey 2009 Prepared for Wyllie & Skene Prepared by Oceanica Consulting Pty Ltd April 2009 Report No. 782_003/1 Client: Wyllie & Skene Revisions history DISTRIBUTION REVIEW Version Author No. Copies & Recipients Date Reviewer Date Format Draft 1 M Nyegaard M Bailey 30/3/09 Draft 2 M Nyegaard J Cownie PDF 30/3/09 Draft 3 M Nyegaard J Cownie PDF 31/3/09 Final M Nyegaard J Cownie PDF 2/4/09 Status This report is “Draft” until the author and director have signed it off for final release. A “Draft” report should not be used for any purpose other than to be reviewed with the intention of generating a “Final” version. Approved for final release: Author: Marianne Nyegaard Director: Mark Bailey Disclaimer This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of Wyllie & Skene, and is subject to and issued in accordance with the agreed terms and scope between Wyllie & Skene and Oceanica Consulting Pty Ltd. Oceanica Consulting Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for it in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. Copying this report without the permission of Wyllie & Skene or Oceanica Consulting Pty Ltd is not permitted. Cover Main image: Prison Island, Cocos (Keeling) Islands, February 2009 (Oceanica Consulting); Minor images: Porites australiensis. bommie off Rumah Baru, Cocos (Keeling) Islands, February 2009 (Oceanica Consulting); Thalassia hemprichii and Caulerpa spp. bed off Rumah Baru, Cocos (Keeling) Islands, February 2009 (Oceanica Consulting). The Oceanica logo is a registered trade mark of Oceanica Consulting Pty Ltd which is protected by law. You may not use this trade mark without first obtaining the permission of Oceanica Consulting Pty Ltd. © Copyright 2009 Oceanica Consulting Pty Ltd Contents 1. Introduction......................................................................................................................1 2. Coral surveys....................................................................................................................2 2.1. Verification of the Porites species ............................................................................. 2 2.2. Coral sites ............................................................................................................................ 2 2.2.1. Monitoring sites ........................................................................................................ 2 2.2.2. Reference sites ......................................................................................................... 2 2.2.3. Additional monitoring sites .................................................................................... 2 2.2.4. Bommie selection..................................................................................................... 4 2.3. Coral health ......................................................................................................................... 4 2.3.1. Assessment ............................................................................................................... 4 2.3.2. Results........................................................................................................................ 4 2.4. Observations of coral spawning ................................................................................. 6 2.5. Visual inspection of coral bommies in channel..................................................... 7 2.5.1. Search for ‘Bommie C, D and E’ – inner channel.............................................. 7 2.5.2. Search for ‘Bommie B’ ............................................................................................ 8 2.5.3. Search for “Bommie A”........................................................................................... 8 2.5.4. Candidates for Relocation .................................................................................... 12 2.5.5. Relocation method................................................................................................. 14 3. Seagrass and macroalgae .........................................................................................15 3.1. Seagrass/macroalgae sites ........................................................................................ 15 3.1.1. Monitoring sites ...................................................................................................... 15 3.1.2. Reference sites ....................................................................................................... 15 3.1.3. Additional monitoring sites .................................................................................. 15 3.2. Visual estimation of above ground biomass........................................................ 17 3.2.1. Introduction............................................................................................................. 17 3.2.2. Visual estimation of above ground biomass .................................................... 17 3.3. Seagrass and macroalgae health survey............................................................... 21 3.3.1. Site descriptions..................................................................................................... 21 3.3.2. Community composition and smothering......................................................... 24 4. Water quality..................................................................................................................26 4.1. Turbidity profiles at seagrass/macroalgae and coral sites ........................... 26 4.2. TSS/turbidity correlation............................................................................................. 26 5. References.......................................................................................................................28 Oceanica: Wyllie & Skene: Rumah Baru Freight and Passenger Terminal, Baseline Survey 2009 i List of Tables Table 2.1 Coral monitoring and reference sites ......................................................... 5 Table 2.2 Previous observations of coral spawning at Cocos (Keeling) Islands ............... 6 Table 2.3 Summary of large bommies located in the proposed dredge channel during the baseline survey 2009. Proposed bommies for relocation are highlighted. Coordinates are given in UTM47 GDA94.................................. 13 Table 3.1 General description of each seagrass/macroalgae site ................................ 22 Table 4.1 Turbidity levels (NTU) measured during the baseline survey 2009................ 26 List of Figures Figure 2.1 The two species of bommie forming Porites found off Rumah Baru. P. lobata (left) and P. australiensis (right)...................................................... 2 Figure 2.2 Coral sites selected and marked during the baseline survey 2009 (CH1- CH4 and CR1) and sites noted for potential future monitoring (CH5-CH6) ....... 3 Figure 2.3 Mean live coral cover (of total bommie area) and sediment cover (of live coral cover). 95% confidence interval shown as bars ................................... 6 Figure 2.4 Small Porites australiensis (left and middle) and dead bommie cluster (A01-1) (right) at site A01 ....................................................................... 7 Figure 2.5 The two largest bommies found at location A01; Porites lobata (A01-2) (left) and the smooth, light coloured species (A01-3) (right) ......................... 8 Figure 2.6 The two large Porites australiensis bommies at site A02 (A02-1 and A02- 2)......................................................................................................... 8 Figure 2.7 Examples of the scattered Porites lobata found throughout the outer third part of the proposed channel.................................................................... 9 Figure 2.8 A03-1: Large Porites lobata found at A03 (left); A05-1: Large Porites of the smooth, light species found at A05 (right) ............................................ 9 Figure 2.9 CB2-1: Mostly dead bommie (left) and CB2-2: mixed bommie of P. lobata and the smooth, light Porites species (left) found at CB2 .............................. 9 Figure 2.10 CB1-1: The large, dead bommie (found at CB1 at the NE corner of the proposed channel ................................................................................. 10 Figure 2.11 Bommies located in the proposed dredge channel during the baseline survey 2009 ........................................................................................ 11 Figure 2.12 Snorkeler picking up small bommie in the proposed dredge channel during the baseline survey 2009 ............................................................. 14 Figure 3.1 Seagrass/macroalgae impact and reference sites assessed (S1-S8) or identified for potential future monitoring (S10-S11) during the baseline survey 2009 ........................................................................................ 16 Figure 3.2 Seagrass/macroalgae mat (left) lifting off from the seabed (right) ............... 18 Figure 3.3 Biomass index 1-5 (left to right) ............................................................. 18 Figure 3.4 Snorkeler harvesting the above-ground biomass (left) leaving a bare patch (right) .......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GRIFFIN ELECTRICITY PTY LTD Collie B Power Station
    GRIFFIN ELECTRICITY PTY LTD Collie B Power Station (Collie B) Proponent’s Response to Submissions April 2005 Table of Contents 1 SUMMARY OF SUBMISSIONS RECEIVED........................................................ 1 2 NOISE................................................................................................................... 3 3 SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER ....................................................... 7 4 FLORA AND FAUNA ......................................................................................... 12 5 ATMOSPHERIC EMISSIONS ............................................................................ 13 6 GREENHOUSE ISSUES .................................................................................... 29 7 LIQUID AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL.......................................................... 38 8 SOCIAL AND HERITAGE ISSUES.................................................................... 51 9 OTHER ISSUES ................................................................................................. 52 10 GLOSSARY........................................................................................................ 56 11 BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................ 59 Collie B Power Station – Responses to Issues raised in Submissions Page i List of Tables Table 1 – Summary of Noise Levels ...................................................................................3 Table 2 - Collie Power Station Sound Power Level............................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • University of Southern Queensland Facility of Health, Engineering And
    University of Southern Queensland Facility of Health, Engineering and Sciences Low Load Frequency Support Capability - Collie Power Station A dissertation submitted by Alan Christian Cornish In fulfillment of the requirements of ENG4111 and 4112 Research Project towards the degree of Bachelor of Power Engineering (Honours) Submitted: October 2020 Abstract Energy markets around the world are in a transitional phase, where wind and solar generation are penetrating the markets at unforeseen rates. The desire to decarbonise emissions associated with power generation in Australia, is seen as the first step in meeting our commitments to the Paris Climate Change Agreement. This has had a significant effect upon the electricity grid within Western Australia. The high volume of renewable generation is creating grid instability during times of low demand. This is a result of fluctuations in generation due to the variability of wind and solar. Network strength is no longer as robust because of the loss of synchronous inertia that was behind a grid mainly powered by thermal machines. Many coal fired stations are attempting to become more flexible and change from base load to cyclical operation to assist counteract the irregular nature of wind and solar generation. Collie Power Station is one such station, attempting to improve its operational flexibility. One aspect is the desire that the station move from a current minimum load setpoint of 130MW to 105MW (generated) to assist the station remain dispatched at low load rather than desynchronising it from the grid. The aim of this dissertation is to model the frequency support capability at 105MW to determine if the station continues to provide frequency support for the grid.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014-11-25 QWON Power Stations
    LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL C1379 QUESTION WITHOUT NOTICE (Of which some notice has been given) Tuesday, 25 November 2014 Hon Robin Chapple to the Leader ofthe House representing the Minister for Energy. Please provide a summary of all active power stations in Western Australia, including: age; capacity profile; fuel and/or mine type; number of employees; whether it is on or off the grid; and the closure schedule. I thankthe Hon. Member for some notice of this question. I table the attached document. The Public Utilities Office has relied on the Independent Market Operator for data concerning generators on the SWIS and has reported the maximum sent out capacity offered by these facilities into the Balancing Market, as of 25 November 2014. These figures may differ slightly from the number of capacity credits awarded and from facility nameplate capacity owing to factors including parasitic load and ambient temperature. For NWIS and NIS facilities, various sources have been used as there is no single definitive list of facilities. The nature of mining operations has not been investigated. The Public Utilities Office does not have access to data on the number of employees or on the closure schedule of power stations. The expected plant life of power stations is variable, a function of maintenance regimes and commercial considerations. ATTACHMENT TO QWN C1379 . 'I . " ~ -1J&1t~-n i ~,'l;(, : 'C' 4\", lTt ~A','~:'l';"(~.i~ffil!. " l]f,:,gl '~. l) , '. lifP'\1 ~, , •. 'fg~~t:t.: :' (~~.~:~n.', . ~ j - llll' ~!l!i:jliiW~tlilit~r~QJ\l1~~t~ii~Sys:t~m;(~~),~'•.
    [Show full text]
  • Bp Kwinana Oil Refinery Western Australia
    NOMINATION FOR HERITAGE RECOGNITION BP KWINANA OIL REFINERY WESTERN AUSTRALIA 2005 2 INDEX DRAFT NOMINATION LETTER APPENDIX B - PLAQUING NOMINATION ASSESSMENT FORM APPENDIX C - ASSESSMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE PHOTOGRAPHS Not attached to this document PLAQUE WORDING ATTACHMENTS Not attached to this document 1. Kwinana Industrial Area Economic Impact Study Figure 1.1 : Industrial Development in the Kwinana Industrial Area Figure 1.2 : Study Area Showing Participating Industries Figure 3.4 : Industrial Integration in Kwinana in 2002 2. Biography of Sir Russell Dumas 3. Biography of Sir David Brand 3 Draft Cover Letter to BP Refinery HEM Nomination The Administrator Engineering Heritage Australia Engineers Australia Engineering House 11 National Circuit Barton ACT 2600 Dear Sir/Madam, HEM Nomination for BP Kwinana Oil Refinery Western Australia We have pleasure in forwarding the original plus three copies of a nomination for the BP Kwinana Oil Refinery to be considered for a Historic Engineering Marker. We have previously forwarded a Proposal to Plaque to the Plaquing Sub-Committee and received a favourable response. We have had preliminary discussions with the Owner’s representative and reached general agreement, subject to our nomination being successful, to hold a Plaquing Ceremony on or about October 25 next, the 50th anniversary of the official opening of the refinery Yours sincerely Tony Moulds Chairman Engineering Heritage Panel Engineers Australia Western Australian Division 4 APPENDIX B PLAQUING NOMINATION ASSESSMENT FORM OWNER BP REFINERY [KWINANA] PTY LTD LOCATION The BP refinery is located within the boundaries of the Kwinana Shire Council, Western Australia. It is situated on Lot 14, Diagram 74883, Mason Road, Kwinana.
    [Show full text]
  • A Journey Towards Facilitating Multiple-Use of Cockburn Sound and Owen Anchorage Stage One Parts I, II And
    A journey towards facilitating Multiple-use of Cockburn Sound and Owen Anchorage Stage One Parts I, II and III Background paper for the Cockburn Sound Management Council Prepared in consultation with the Multiple-use Support Team 2009 ISBN 1 921094 18 4 A Journey towards Facilitating Multiple-use of Cockburn Sound and Owen Anchorage Stage One Parts I, II and III Background Paper for the Cockburn Sound Management Council Initiated by Barb Green Prepared and developed by Barb Green, Geoff Botting, Dr Tom Rose and Officers of the Cockburn Sound Management Council – Department of Environment and Conservation for the Cockburn Sound Management Council Shop 1/ 15 Railway Terrace Rockingham Beach WA 6168 In consultation with the Cockburn Sound Management Council’s Multiple-use Support Team Dr Tom Rose – Council Coordinator Professor Kateryna Longley – Chair Mr Keith Tocas – Recreational Fishing Representative Mr John Smedley – Recreational Boating Representative Mr Bart Houwen – Community Representative Mr Gino Valenti – Fremantle Ports Representative Mr Andrew Hill – Department of Fisheries Representative Mr Tim Bray (in Andrew Hill’s absence) Mr Ian Briggs – Department of Industry and Resources Representative Dr John Keesing – CSIRO Marine Representative Dr Rod Lukatelich – Kwinana Industries Council Representatives and Mr Milan Vicentic – GIS Coordinator, Department of Environment and Conservation Mr Chris Coffey – Environment Officer, Cockburn Sound Management Council Ms Jessica Davis – Environment Officer, Cockburn Sound Management Council
    [Show full text]
  • Fremantle Oil Spill Inquiry '
    FREMANTLE OIL SPILL INQUIRY r ' ., ....... Report and Recommendations by the Environmental Protection Authority 8 ' Department of Conservation and Environment Perth, Western Australia Bulletin 259 September 1986 FREMANTLE OIL SPILL INQUIRY REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by the ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AUTHORITY Department of Conservation and Environment Perth, Western Australia Bulletin 259 September 1986 CONTENTS Page Executive Summary 1. Introduction . 1 2. Summary of events 2 3. Assess the environmmental hazards of existing 4 and new petroleum fuel pipelines in the Fremantle region ..................... 4. Seek advice on the adequacy of pipeline monitoring 8 schemes and emergency shutdown arrangements 5. Revort on the effectiveness of the emergency response. 9 system . ........ 6. Examine the environmental effectiveness of the oil . 12 spill clean-up arrangements and report on the extent of damage to the marine environment . 7. Recommend whether further protection measures are 14 required .................... 8. Acknowledgements . 15 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Fremantle Oil Spill Inquiry was established by the Environmental Protection Authority to report on the oil spill that occurred on Sunday, 27 July 1986. Fracture of an oil pipeline weld resulted in oil flowing into Fremantle stormwater drains and then into the fishing Boat Harbour. Some of the oil escaped into Cockburn Sound and eventually accumulated on Garden Island. Approximately 50 tonnes of oil were spilt with all but some 8 tonnes being recovered from the roads, stormwater drains and Fishing Boat Harbour. The following are conclusions in relation to the terms of reference of the Inquiry. 1. Assess the environmental hazards of existing and new petroleum fuel pipelines in the Fremantle region. There is uncertain regulatory control over petroleum pipelines in the Fremantle area.
    [Show full text]
  • Answers to Questions Prior to Hearing
    Hon Mike Nahan MLA Treasurer; Minister for Energy; Citizenship and Multicultural Interests Ourref: 48-13528; 48-13527 Hon Ken Travers MLC Chairman Estimates and Financial Operations Committee Parliament House PERTH WA 6000 Attn: Mr Mark Warner Committee Clerk Dear Mr Travers QUESTIONS PRIOR TO 2014-15 ANNUAL REPORT HEARINGS - SYNERGY AND HORIZON POWER In response to the Committee's letter of 20 October 2015, please find attached responses to the questions prior to hearing, in respect of Synergy and Horizon Power's 2014-15 annual report. Yours sincerely DR MIKE NAHAN MLA TREASURER Att. CC: Hon Peter Collier MLC Minister representing the Minister for Energy in the Legislative Council 1 9 NOV 2015 Level 13, Dumas House, 2 Havelock Street, West Perth, Western Australia 6005 Telephone: +61 8 6552 5700 Facsimile: +61 8 6552 5701 Email: [email protected] ESTIMATES AND FINANCIAL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE 2014/15 ANNUAL REPORT HEARINGS QUESTIONS PRIOR TO HEARING Synergy Annual Report 2014/15 Hon Robin Chappie asked: 1) Page 5 under "Our Business," I ask: a) How many people are employed at each of your nine power stations? Answer: Employees (2014-15) Cockbum Power Station 19 Kalgoorlie Gas Turbine Mungarra Gas Turbine 5 Pinjar Power Station Kwinana Power Station (includes Kwinana Gas Turbines) 11 Geraldton Gas Turbine 0 Worsley (South West Co-Generation Joint Venture) 0 (operated by Worsley Alumina) Muja Power Station 337 Collie Power Station 1 FTE + contractors as required. How many people are employed at each of your nine wind farms? Answer: Employees (2014-15) Albany Wind Farm Bremer Bay Wind-Diesel System 4 Esperance Wind Farms Hopetoun Wind-Diesel System Coral Bay Wind-Diesel System 2 Denham Wind-Diesel System 2 Kalbarri Wind Farm 1 Mumbida Wind Farm 6 How many people are employed at your one solar farm? Answer: Employees (2014-15) Greenough River Solar Farm 1.5 2) Page 21 under "Delivering energy" you describe two station transformers failing and a partial cooling tower collapse at Muja Power Station, I ask: a) Have these issues been rectified? Answer: Yes.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovate. Reconciliation Action Plan
    Innovate Reconciliation Action Plan November 2020 – November 2022 Together We Stand, Forever We Grow Samantha Ballard, 2020 Acrylic on canvas Commissioned for inclusion in the City of Kwinana’s Innovate Reconciliation Action Plan, this piece explores various themes around reconciliation. “Our past heals in our hearts, respect never dies, staying connected with our family and friends, growing stronger forever, and through reconciliation our nation accepts.” Page 2 Innovate Reconciliation Action Plan – November 2020 – November 2022 Message from Reconciliation Australia Reconciliation Australia commends The City of Kwinana on the formal Getting these steps right will ensure the sustainability of future RAPs and endorsement of its inaugural Innovate Reconciliation Action Plan (RAP). reconciliation initiatives, and provide meaningful impact toward Australia’s reconciliation journey. Commencing an Innovate RAP is a crucial and rewarding period in an organisation’s reconciliation journey. It is a time to build strong Congratulations The City of Kwinana on your Innovate RAP and I look foundations and relationships, ensuring sustainable, thoughtful, and forward to following your ongoing reconciliation journey. impactful RAP outcomes into the future. Karen Mundine Since 2006, RAPs have provided a framework for organisations to leverage Chief Executive Officer their structures and diverse spheres of influence to support the national Reconciliation Australia reconciliation movement. This Innovate RAP is both an opportunity and an invitation for The City of Kwinana to expand its understanding of its core strengths and deepen its relationship with its community, staff, and stakeholders. By investigating and understanding the integral role it plays across its sphere of influence, The City of Kwinana will create dynamic reconciliation outcomes, supported by and aligned with its business objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Emissions Inventory Major Resource Projects – AGEIS 2012
    FACILITIES CURRENTLY OPERATING Name/Location; Facility name, Operator Scope 1 (Direct) Source of data General activity GHG emissions Point source CO2e TPA emissions total, where stationary energy is accounted for elsewhere (eg Power derived from SWIS) Alkimos Wastewater Treatment Water Corporation Plant Sourced from SWIS 16,000 EPA Bulletins 1238, 1239 Argyle, diamonds Rio Tinto Argyle Diamonds sustainable development 49,000 report 2009 and 2010 Armadale Brick Austral Bricks Data provided by Company giving their (Brickworks Ltd) 42,968 state total emissions Cardup Brick Austral Bricks (Brickworks Ltd) see Armadale Brick Caversham Tile Bristile (Brickworks Ltd) see Armadale Brick Malaga Brick Austral Bricks (Brickworks Ltd) see Armadale Brick Australind; titanium Cristal Global Sourced from SWIS 34,000 Company report (June 2009) Boddington; Mt Saddleback, BHP Billiton - Worsley bauxite Alumina Pty Ltd 243,000 AAC Sustainability report 2009 Bonaparte Basin; Blacktip gas ENI Australia project not known Bonaparte Basin; Puffin, oil AED Oil Ltd (in administration) not known Brockman Syncline 4 Iron Ore Rio Tinto (form. Project Hamersley Iron Pty Limited) 111,800 EPA Bulletin 1214 WA GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Page 2 Bronzewing - Mt McClure, gold Navigator Resources Ltd not known Burrup; Ammonia Plant, Burrup Burrup Fertilisers Pty NGER Greenhouse and Energy Information Peninsula Ltd 1,484,877 2010-11 Canning Basin; Blina, Lloyd, Buru Energy Ltd Sundown & West Terrace, oil 244 Data provided by Company Cape Preston; Central Block, Sino Iron (CITIC)
    [Show full text]
  • P6252b-6253A Hon Robin Chapple; Hon Peter Collier ENERGY
    Extract from Hansard [COUNCIL — Tuesday, 15 September 2015] p6252b-6253a Hon Robin Chapple; Hon Peter Collier ENERGY — POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENTS 3306. Hon Robin Chapple to the Leader of the House representing the Minister for Energy: (1) Will the Minister provide a list of all of the Power Purchase Agreements signed in the last ten years, detailing which companies were contracted, for what capacity, which fuel was to be used in the electricity generation and what proportion overall is from renewable sources? (2) Will the Minister provide a list of all the coal fired power stations, including the various stages of those plants, in the South West interconnected system and the year that they were built? (3) Will the Minister outline the life expectancy of a coal fired power station? (4) For the coal fired power stations owned by Synergy, will the Minister outline the availability of these plants over the last five years taking into account all downtime due to planned and unplanned maintenance? (5) For the coal fired power stations owned by Synergy, will the Minister outline the expected timeline for the closure of those power stations, given that many of them have exceeded their initial life expectancy? (6) How much has Synergy spent on maintenance, including all refurbishments and upgrades on its coal fired power stations over the last five years? Hon Peter Collier replied: (1) No, this information is commercial in confidence. (2) The table below details all of the coal fired power station units currently operational in the South West Interconnected
    [Show full text]
  • Collie Power Station Wastewater Management and Disposal System
    Collie Power Station Wastewater Management and Disposal System Western Power Corporation Report and recommendations of the Environmental Protection Authority Environmental Protection Authority Perth, Western Australia Bulletin 777 May 1995 Contents Page Summary and recommendations i 1. Introduction and background 1 1.1. The purpose of this report 1.2. Background 1 1.3. The proposal 1 1.4. Assessment process 2 2. Summary description of proposal 5 2.1. Need for the proposal 5 2.2. Summary of proposal 5 3. Environmental impact assessment method 6 3. I. General 6 3.2. Public submissions 6 3.2.1 Synopsis of public submissions 7 4. Evaluation 7 4.1. Effects of saline wastewater on the marine environment 8 4.1.1 Objective 8 4.1.2 Evaluation Framework 8 A 1 0 "T, 1 ·-' Public subn1isslons 9 4.1.4 Proponent's response 9 4.1.5 Evaluation 10 4.2. Integrity of pipeline -impacts associated with pipeline mptures 11 4.2.1 Objective 11 4.2.2 Evaluation Framework 11 4.2.3 Public submissions 12 4.2.4 Proponent's response 12 4.2.5 Evaluation 14 4.3. Impacts of construction of pipeline and wastewater management system. 14 4.3.1 Objective 14 4.3.2 Evaluation Framework 14 4.3.3 Public submissions 15 4.3.4 Proponent's response 15 4.3.5 Evaluation 16 4.4. Pipeline route selection 17 4.4. l Objective l'~ I 4.4.2 Evaluation Framework 17 4.4.3 Public submissions 18 4.4.4 Proponent's response 18 4.4.5 Evaluation 19 4.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2005 Western Power Annual Report 2005
    embracing the future Western Power annual report 2005 Western Power Annual Report 2005 operations review YEAR IN REVIEW Chairman’s AND MANAGING DIRECTor’s YEAR IN REVIEW 2 NETWORKS BUSINESS UNIT 6 GENERATION BUSINESS UNIT 12 RETAIL BUSINESS UNIT 19 REGIONAL BUSINESS UNIT 22 REVIEW OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE 27 ELECTRICITY REFORM 29 OUR COMPANY OUR COMPANY IN 2005 31 AREAS SERVICED BY WESTERN POWER 32 STATEMENT OF CORPORATE PRIORITIES 33 OUR ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE 34 KEY RESULT AREAS CORPORATE RESULT AREAS 35 CORPORATE FACTS AND FIGURES 38 GLOSSARY 41 ELECTRICITY CORPORATION ACT 1994 42 financial review STATISTICAL SUMMARY 44 DIRECTORS’ REPORT 45 STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE 64 STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION 65 STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS 66 NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2005 67 DIRECTORS’ DECLARATION 117 INDEPENDENT AUDIT REPORT 118 Chairman’s and Managing Director’s Year In Review Neil Hamilton Chairman Tony Iannello Managing Director The WA energy industry has undergone • made a commitment to build our capabilities, both revolutionary change over the past 1 months. At people and systems. the centre of that change, Western Power has been With these changes and challenges, Western Power has challenged to deliver safe, reliable and efficient continued to perform strongly, achieving solid profits for energy services while positioning the organisation the eleventh consecutive year and delivering significant for a competitive and dynamic market. We have dividends to our shareholder, the State of Western needed to respond quickly and positively to energy Australia. We have approached the challenges set by reforms while working towards restoring confidence the events of the previous year with enthusiasm and among our customers and the Western Australian commitment and have successfully shown that we are able community.
    [Show full text]