DOCSLIB.ORG

Average and Marginal Propensities to Consume and Save Page 1 of 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Aggregate Expenditures Model Components of Aggregate Expenditure Average and Marginal Propensities to Consume and Save Page 1 of 3 We’re building Keynes’s model of the macroeconomy. It’s a model that’s driven by demand. If people won’t buy stuff, then it accumulates on store shelves; and when factories cut back their production, people are laid off work. The economy keeps adjusting until we find an equilibrium. In this equilibrium, the spending plans of consumers, businesses, the government, and foreigners add up to create an income on which those spending plans are based. That is, we get a stable circular flow between what people are planning to spend, and the goods and services that are actually produced by factories to meet the demand. That’s macroeconomic equilibrium. To understand macroeconomic equilibrium, we have to look at the plans that consumers, businesses, the government, and foreigners make. Those plans are based on, for example, consumer income, interest rates, and other environmental factors in the economy. We’ve been thinking about the consumption function, and now we’re going to discuss another way of describing consumer behavior, because it turns out that you can just as easily describe consumer behavior in terms of savings as you can describe it in terms of spending. That’s because consumer income can be used in one of three ways. When you get a paycheck, there are only three things you can do with it. You can either spend it, in which case we call it consumption; you can put it in a mutual fund, or in the bank, in which case we call it savings; or the government can take it, in which case we call it taxes. These three components add up to consumer income; consumers spend, they save, and they pay taxes. Now for the time being we’re going to assume that consumers are not paying taxes; that is, taxes are equal to zero. And, in that case, consumer spending and consumer saving add up to the total of consumer income. Well, once you’ve seen this relationship, a kind of complementarity becomes obvious. That is, consumer savings is just as accurate a description of consumer behavior, and just as complete, as is consumer spending. Let’s go back to the numbers that we considered in the consumption schedule in a previous exercise. Here we have income equal to 40, and consumer spending equal to 42. That means that the consumer’s spending $2.00 more than his income in this period, which means that he’s drawing down his savings by $2.00 – that is, dis-savings is enabling the consumer to spend more than his income. If income is 50 and consumer spending is 50, then savings is equal to zero – a kind of break-even point. And if consumer income is equal to 80 and consumer spending is equal to 74, then that means the savings is equal to 6 – the consumer is putting some money into the bank. Here you see this complementary relation between consumption and savings. Now, before, we described consumer spending in a function, an algebraic equation that we called the consumption function. Now what we’re going to do is look at a relationship between the consumption function and the savings function. That is, once you know how the consumer behaves, you can describe also the savings function. Let’s look now at this relationship. Output, which is consumer income, is equal to consumption plus savings. We also know that consumption is equal to A, autonomous consumption – plus B, which is the marginal propensity to consume – multiplied by Y, which is income. Well, both of these things are true; therefore, if we plug this description of consumption into the previous equation, we can get this: Y is equal to A plus B times Y plus S. And if we solve this equation for S, let’s see what we get: -A – I get that by moving A to the other side of the equation; I move BY to the other side of the equation, and I get 1 minus B times Y is equal to S. If I move everything over to the left-hand side except for savings, this is the equation that I get: Savings is equal to -A plus 1 minus B times Y. Let’s take a moment and see if there isn’t some intuition in all of these symbols. Well, think about it. Anything that the consumers are going to be spending at zero income – that is, the autonomous component of consumption is going to be equal to dis-savings. That is, if income is equal to zero, and the consumers have to have food, clothing, and other necessary expenditures equal to A, the only way they can get that is to draw down their savings. So autonomous consumption is going to be equal to autonomous dis-savings. This is what you have to take out of your savings account when income is zero to meet your basic needs. The next to think about is this slope. Up here, B represents the fraction of each additional dollar that you spend on Aggregate Expenditures Model Components of Aggregate Expenditure Average and Marginal Propensities to Consume and Save Page 2 of 3 consumption goods and services. That means that what you’re doing with the rest must be savings. So if B is the fraction that you are consuming, then 1 minus B is the fraction of an additional dollar that you are saving. So you see here that B – the marginal propensity to consume – plus 1 minus B – the marginal propensity to save – is equal to 1. Every additional dollar that you get is broken into its two possible uses; one fraction of it you’re going to consume, and one fraction of it you’re going to save. In the example we looked at previously, the fraction that was consumed of each additional dollar was $.80, so a .8. That means that the marginal propensity to save in this case is .2. For every additional dollar you receive, you’re going to save $.20. The marginal propensity to consume is 1 minus the marginal propensity to save. The marginal propensity to save is 1 minus the marginal propensity to consume. Every dollar is divided into the part that’s spent and the part that’s saved, and the two propensities – the two fractions – add up to 1. Now since that’s the case, we’re able to do some calculations based on the numbers that we used in our previous example. So if it’s true that consumption is equal to 10 plus .8 times Y, then savings is going to be equal to -10 plus .2 times Y. You can see where I got this; if you take this amount of consumption and you subtract this formula from Y – S equals Y minus C equals Y minus this formula for consumption – and if you go ahead and do the algebra here, you get Y – take the minus sign into the parenthesis – Y minus. 8(Y) is .2(Y), and there’s no constant outside, so your constant is going to be left at -10; savings is -10 plus .2 times Y – there’s the savings formula. Now let’s take this algebra and carry it back over to the graphs that we’ve seen earlier, because we’re going to see now a graphical complementarity between savings and consumption. Previously, we wrote consumption on the vertical axis as a function of income on the horizontal axis, and we drew it out, graphing it as this linear function. Here’s my intercept of 10 – my autonomous consumption, what you spend even at zero income – and the slope of my consumption curve is going to be rise over the run. The rise here is the change in consumption, the run is the change in income, and the change in consumption that results from the change in income is equal to the marginal propensity to consume, which we’ve labeled with the letter B – the slope in our consumption diagram. Now the savings curve is going to look like the complement of that picture. Down here we have the intercept, which is -10, because if income is zero and you’re spending 10, that means when income is zero, you must be saving -10. So if we represent savings as a vertical coordinate, as a function of income, the horizontal coordinate – when income is zero, savings is -10. Let’s find another point on the savings curve. Well, look at this point right here. When consumption is equal to income – that is, when the red line crosses the black dotted line – savings is equal to zero. The black dotted line indicates all of those points here where consumption is equal to income; those are all the points that are on that line. So if consumption – the planned consumer spending – is equal to the income that consumers receive, planned savings will be equal to zero. Therefore, since this curve is linear and has a slope of 1 minus C, we can go ahead and draw the savings function. Here’s savings as a function of income – just like up here, we have consumption as a function of income – we now have a slope of the change in savings that results from a change in income. The slope of this curve is equal to the marginal propensity to save. The change in savings that results from the change in income is the marginal propensity to save.
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 17: Consumption 1

    Chapter 17: Consumption 1

    11/6/2013 Keynes’s conjectures Chapter 17: Consumption 1. 0 < MPC < 1 2. Average propensity to consume (APC) falls as income rises. (APC = C/Y ) 3. Income is the main determinant of consumption. CHAPTER 17 Consumption 0 CHAPTER 17 Consumption 1 The Keynesian consumption function The Keynesian consumption function As income rises, consumers save a bigger C C fraction of their income, so APC falls. CCcY CCcY c c = MPC = slope of the 1 CC consumption APC c C function YY slope = APC Y Y CHAPTER 17 Consumption 2 CHAPTER 17 Consumption 3 Early empirical successes: Problems for the Results from early studies Keynesian consumption function . Households with higher incomes: . Based on the Keynesian consumption function, . consume more, MPC > 0 economists predicted that C would grow more . save more, MPC < 1 slowly than Y over time. save a larger fraction of their income, . This prediction did not come true: APC as Y . As incomes grew, APC did not fall, . Very strong correlation between income and and C grew at the same rate as income. consumption: . Simon Kuznets showed that C/Y was income seemed to be the main very stable in long time series data. determinant of consumption CHAPTER 17 Consumption 4 CHAPTER 17 Consumption 5 1 11/6/2013 The Consumption Puzzle Irving Fisher and Intertemporal Choice . The basis for much subsequent work on Consumption function consumption. C from long time series data (constant APC ) . Assumes consumer is forward-looking and chooses consumption for the present and future to maximize lifetime satisfaction. Consumption function . Consumer’s choices are subject to an from cross-sectional intertemporal budget constraint, household data a measure of the total resources available for (falling APC ) present and future consumption.
  • Shopping Enjoyment and Obsessive-Compulsive Buying

    Shopping Enjoyment and Obsessive-Compulsive Buying

    European Journal of Business and Management www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1905 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2839 (Online) DOI: 10.7176/EJBM Vol.11, No.3, 2019 Young Buyers: Shopping Enjoyment and Obsessive-Compulsive Buying Ayaz Samo 1 Hamid Shaikh 2 Maqsood Bhutto 3 Fiza Rani 3 Fayaz Samo 2* Tahseen Bhutto 2 1.School of Business Administration, Shah Abdul Latif University, Khairpur, Sindh, Pakistan 2.School of Business Administration, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian, China 3.Sukkur Institute of Business Administration, Sindh, Pakistan Abstract The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the relationship between hedonic shopping motivations and obsessive- compulsive shopping behavior from youngsters’ perspective. The study is based on the survey of 615 young Chinese buyers (mean age=24) and analyzed through Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). The findings show that adventure seeking, gratification seeking, and idea shopping have a positive effect on obsessive-compulsive buying, whereas role shopping and value shopping have a negative effect on obsessive-compulsive buying. However, social shopping is found to be insignificant to obsessive-compulsive buying. The study has a number of implications. Marketers should display more information about latest trends and fashions, as young buyers are found to shop for ideas and information. Managers should design the layouts with more exciting and impressive features, as these buyers are found to shop for adventure and gratification. Salesmen should take greater care into consideration while offering them to buy products such as gifts, souvenir etc. for their dear ones, as these buyers are less likely to enjoy buying for others. Moreover, business managers should less rely on discount promotions, as this consumer segment is found to be less likely to shop for discounts and bargains.
  • What Role Does Consumer Sentiment Play in the U.S. Economy?

    What Role Does Consumer Sentiment Play in the U.S. Economy?

    The economy is mired in recession. Consumer spending is weak, investment in plant and equipment is lethargic, and firms are hesitant to hire unemployed workers, given bleak forecasts of demand for final products. Monetary policy has lowered short-term interest rates and long rates have followed suit, but consumers and businesses resist borrowing. The condi- tions seem ripe for a recovery, but still the economy has not taken off as expected. What is the missing ingredient? Consumer confidence. Once the mood of consumers shifts toward the optimistic, shoppers will buy, firms will hire, and the engine of growth will rev up again. All eyes are on the widely publicized measures of consumer confidence (or consumer sentiment), waiting for the telltale uptick that will propel us into the longed-for expansion. Just as we appear to be headed for a "double-dipper," the mood swing occurs: the indexes of consumer confi- dence register 20-point increases, and the nation surges into a prolonged period of healthy growth. oes the U.S. economy really behave as this fictional account describes? Can a shift in sentiment drive the economy out of D recession and back into good health? Does a lack of consumer confidence drag the economy into recession? What causes large swings in consumer confidence? This article will try to answer these questions and to determine consumer confidence’s role in the workings of the U.S. economy. ]effre9 C. Fuhrer I. What Is Consumer Sentitnent? Senior Econotnist, Federal Reserve Consumer sentiment, or consumer confidence, is both an economic Bank of Boston.
  • AP Macroeconomics: Vocabulary 1. Aggregate Spending (GDP)

    AP Macroeconomics: Vocabulary 1. Aggregate Spending (GDP)

    AP Macroeconomics: Vocabulary 1. Aggregate Spending (GDP): The sum of all spending from four sectors of the economy. GDP = C+I+G+Xn 2. Aggregate Income (AI) :The sum of all income earned by suppliers of resources in the economy. AI=GDP 3. Nominal GDP: the value of current production at the current prices 4. Real GDP: the value of current production, but using prices from a fixed point in time 5. Base year: the year that serves as a reference point for constructing a price index and comparing real values over time. 6. Price index: a measure of the average level of prices in a market basket for a given year, when compared to the prices in a reference (or base) year. 7. Market Basket: a collection of goods and services used to represent what is consumed in the economy 8. GDP price deflator: the price index that measures the average price level of the goods and services that make up GDP. 9. Real rate of interest: the percentage increase in purchasing power that a borrower pays a lender. 10. Expected (anticipated) inflation: the inflation expected in a future time period. This expected inflation is added to the real interest rate to compensate for lost purchasing power. 11. Nominal rate of interest: the percentage increase in money that the borrower pays the lender and is equal to the real rate plus the expected inflation. 12. Business cycle: the periodic rise and fall (in four phases) of economic activity 13. Expansion: a period where real GDP is growing. 14. Peak: the top of a business cycle where an expansion has ended.
  • Consumption Growth Parallels Income Growth: Some New Evidence

    Consumption Growth Parallels Income Growth: Some New Evidence

    This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: National Saving and Economic Performance Volume Author/Editor: B. Douglas Bernheim and John B. Shoven, editors Volume Publisher: University of Chicago Press Volume ISBN: 0-226-04404-1 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/bern91-2 Conference Date: January 6-7, 1989 Publication Date: January 1991 Chapter Title: Consumption Growth Parallels Income Growth: Some New Evidence Chapter Author: Christopher D. Carroll, Lawrence H. Summers Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c5995 Chapter pages in book: (p. 305 - 348) 10 Consumption Growth Parallels Income Growth: Some New Evidence Christopher D. Carroll and Lawrence H. Summers 10.1 Introduction The idea that consumers allocate their consumption over time so as to max- imize a stable individualistic utility function provides the basis for almost all modem work on the determinants of consumption and saving decisions. The celebrated life-cycle and permanent income hypotheses represent not so much alternative theories of consumption as alternative empirical strategies for fleshing out the same basic idea. While tests of particular implementations of these theories sometimes lead to statistical rejections, life-cycle/permanent income theories succeed in unifying a wide range of diverse phenomena. It is probably fair to accept Franc0 Modigliani’s ( 1980) characterization that “the Life Cycle Hypothesis has proved a very fruitful hypothesis, capable of inte- grating a large variety of facts concerning individual and aggregate saving behaviour.” This paper argues, however, that both permanent income and, to an only slightly lesser extent, life-cycle theories as they have come to be implemented in recent years are inconsistent with the grossest features of cross-country and cross-section data on consumption and income and income growth.
  • The Time Series Consumption Function Revisited

    The Time Series Consumption Function Revisited

    ALAN S. BLINDER Brookings Institution and Princeton University ANGUS DEATON Princeton University The Time Series Consumption Function Revisited THERELATIONSHIP between consumer spending and income is one of the oldest statistical regularitiesof macroeconomics-and one of the stur- diest. Like the aging movie star, it needs a little touching up now and again, but always seems to come bouncingback. A dozen yearsago, boththe theoreticalderivation and the econometric form of the aggregateconsumption function were considered settled. Most economists adheredto one of two ways of puttingFisher's theory of intertemporaloptimization into operation: Milton Friedman's per- manent income hypothesis (henceforth, PIH) or Franco Modigliani's life-cycle hypothesis (henceforth,LCH). ' Since each variantseemed to have sound theoretical underpinnings,and since the two had similar econometricforms that explainedthe data well and had similarimplica- tions for policy, there was not a greatdeal to quarrelabout. Perhapsthe most contentious empirical issue was the apparently large marginal This paperhas benefitedfrom the commentsand suggestionsof AlbertAndo, Whitney Newey, and members of the Brookings Panel and from seminar presentationsat the Universityof Warwick,Princeton University, and Johns Hopkins University.We thank Peter Rathjensand Lori Gruninfor researchassistance and the National Science Foun- dationfor financialsupport. 1. Milton Friedman, A Theory of the Consumption Function (Princeton University Press, 1957); Franco Modigliani and Richard Brumberg,

  • Case, Fair and Oster Macroeconomics Chapter 8 – Aggregate Expenditure and Equilibrium Output Problem 1. Terminology A. MPC

    Case, Fair and Oster Macroeconomics Chapter 8 – Aggregate Expenditure and Equilibrium Output Problem 1. Terminology a. MPC and the multiplier. Multiplier = 1 / (1.0 – MPC) b. Actual and planned investment. Divergence between the two means the economy is out of equilibrium, since the Keynesian equilibrium condition is PAE = GDP or PAE = Y. (PAE = Planned aggregate expenditure) Divergence is due to unplanned inventory changes (an increase in inventory may be due to failure to make anticipated sales, and will result in lower orders to supplying firms and hence to lower employment and GDP. c.Aggregate expenditure and Real GDP. If real aggregate expenditure is equal to real GDP, the economy is in Keynesian equilibrium. Note that the following two chapters always use real GDP, and we won't worry about inflation for these chapters. d.Aggregate output and aggregate income. The circular flow means these are the same thing, looked at from two different perspectives (seller and consumer). Problem 2. Republic of Yuck. Real GDP = 200 billion (note that this may not be an equilibrium value) Planned investment = 75 billion Consumption function : C = 0.75 Y (since 25 percent of income is saved, 75 percent is consumed) Simplest of all Keynesian models: Y = C + I Y = 0.75 Y + 75 Y - 0.75 Y = 75 (1 - .75) Y = 75 0.25Y = 75 multiply both sides by 4 Y = 4 * 75 = 300 billion Since the equilibrium GDP of 300 billion is higher than the actual GDP of 200 billion, we can forecast an increase in actual GDP (as long as the economy is not operating at capacity).
  • Estimation of the Consumption Function Using the Almon Technique Charles Frederick Keithahn Iowa State University

    Estimation of the Consumption Function Using the Almon Technique Charles Frederick Keithahn Iowa State University

    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1973 Estimation of the consumption function using the Almon Technique Charles Frederick Keithahn Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Economics Commons Recommended Citation Keithahn, Charles Frederick, "Estimation of the consumption function using the Almon Technique " (1973). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 5092. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/5092 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image.
  • Dictionary-Of-Economics-2.Pdf

    Dictionary-Of-Economics-2.Pdf

    Dictionary of Economics A & C Black ț London First published in Great Britain in 2003 Reprinted 2006 A & C Black Publishers Ltd 38 Soho Square, London W1D 3HB © P. H. Collin 2003 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means without the permission of the publishers A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library eISBN-13: 978-1-4081-0221-3 Text Production and Proofreading Heather Bateman, Katy McAdam A & C Black uses paper produced with elemental chlorine-free pulp, harvested from managed sustainable forests. Text typeset by A & C Black Printed in Italy by Legoprint Preface Economics is the basis of our daily lives, even if we do not always realise it. Whether it is an explanation of how firms work, or people vote, or customers buy, or governments subsidise, economists have examined evidence and produced theories which can be checked against practice. This book aims to cover the main aspects of the study of economics which students will need to learn when studying for examinations at various levels. The book will also be useful for the general reader who comes across these terms in the financial pages of newspapers as well as in specialist magazines. The dictionary gives succinct explanations of the 3,000 most frequently found terms. It also covers the many abbreviations which are often used in writing on economic subjects. Entries are also given for prominent economists, from Jeremy Bentham to John Rawls, with short biographies and references to their theoretical works.
  • The Impact of Wealth and Sentiment on Consumption: Before and After the Great Recession

    The Impact of Wealth and Sentiment on Consumption: Before and After the Great Recession

    Union College Union | Digital Works Honors Theses Student Work 6-2017 The mpI act of Wealth and Sentiment on Consumption: Before and After the Great Recession Joshua Schwartz Union College - Schenectady, NY Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses Part of the Econometrics Commons, Economic History Commons, and the Income Distribution Commons Recommended Citation Schwartz, Joshua, "The mpI act of Wealth and Sentiment on Consumption: Before and After the Great Recession" (2017). Honors Theses. 81. https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses/81 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Union | Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Union | Digital Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Impact of Wealth and Sentiment on Consumption: Before and After the Great Recession by Joshua R. Schwartz * * * * * * * * * Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Honors in the Department of Economics UNION COLLEGE June, 2017 Abstract SCHWARTZ, JOSHUA ROBERT. The Impact of Wealth and Sentiment on Consumption: Before and After the Great Recession Department of Economics, June 2017 ADVISOR: Eshragh Motahar I study the impact of consumer sentiment and the wealth effect on aggregate U.S. consumption before and after the Great Recession. First I will introduce a background of the 2008 financial crisis and some major factors leading up to it. I will discuss both the Michigan Consumer Sentiment index as well as the Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence index. I will also discuss several measures of net worth relevant for my study.
  • The Role of Consumption in Economic Fluctuations

    The Role of Consumption in Economic Fluctuations

    This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: The American Business Cycle: Continuity and Change Volume Author/Editor: Robert J. Gordon, ed. Volume Publisher: University of Chicago Press Volume ISBN: 0-226-30452-3 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/gord86-1 Publication Date: 1986 Chapter Title: The Role of Consumption in Economic Fluctuations Chapter Author: Robert E. Hall Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c10024 Chapter pages in book: (p. 237 - 266) 4 The Role of Consumption in Economic Fluctuations Robert E. Hall 4.1 The Issues Consumption is the dominant component of GNP. A 1% change in consumption is five times the size of a 1% change in investment. This paper investigates whether the behavior ofconsumers is an independent source of macroeconomic fluctuations or whether most disturbances come from other sectors. Informal commentaries on the business cycle put considerable weight on the independent behavior of consumption. It is commonplace to hear of a business revival sparked by consumers. On the other hand, all modern theories of fluctuations make the consumer a reactor to economic events, not a cause of them. Random shocks in technology are generally the driving force in fully articulated models. This paper develops a framework where the distinction between a movement along a consumption schedule and a shift of the schedule is well defined. Application of the framework to twentieth-century American data shows that shifts of the consumption schedule have probably been an important cause of fluctuations but have probably not been the dominant source of them.
  • A Note on the Consumption Function Douglas G. Steigerwald

    A Note on the Consumption Function Douglas G. Steigerwald

    A Note on the Consumption Function Douglas G. Steigerwald Consumption Function The international depression of the early 20th century undermined the ex- isting theory that extended departures from full employment were prevented by the natural stabilization of macroeconomic forces. In response Keynes (1936) developed a theory of equilibrium at less than full employment and in so do- ing, created the consumption function. As envisaged by Keynes, the function relates aggregate consumption for an economy to variables such as income and wealth. To understand the link between the consumption function and the level of employment at equilibrium, note that the dominant theory prior to Keynes stated that the interest rate would ‡uctuate to ensure that savings equaled the investment required to maintain full employment. By positing that consump- tion depended on income, Keynes was able to show that if the level of saving was not su¢ cient to meet investment at full employment, the level of income would fall thereby reducing consumption and increasing saving. The result would be equilibrium at less than full employment, in accord with the reality of the long-lasting depression. The existence of a consumption function soon took root in economic theory. In basic form, consumption was posited to be an increasing function of income. The fraction of additional income consumed, termed the marginal propensity to consume, was estimated to be very close to one. With estimates of the marginal propensity to consume in hand, questions turned to the evolution of the marginal propensity as an economy matures. Some speculated that the marginal propensity to consume would fall toward zero, as economies develop.