DOCSLIB.ORG

The Time Series Consumption Function Revisited

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ALAN S. BLINDER Brookings Institution and Princeton University ANGUS DEATON Princeton University The Time Series Consumption Function Revisited THERELATIONSHIP between consumer spending and income is one of the oldest statistical regularitiesof macroeconomics-and one of the stur- diest. Like the aging movie star, it needs a little touching up now and again, but always seems to come bouncingback. A dozen yearsago, boththe theoreticalderivation and the econometric form of the aggregateconsumption function were considered settled. Most economists adheredto one of two ways of puttingFisher's theory of intertemporaloptimization into operation: Milton Friedman's per- manent income hypothesis (henceforth, PIH) or Franco Modigliani's life-cycle hypothesis (henceforth,LCH). ' Since each variantseemed to have sound theoretical underpinnings,and since the two had similar econometricforms that explainedthe data well and had similarimplica- tions for policy, there was not a greatdeal to quarrelabout. Perhapsthe most contentious empirical issue was the apparently large marginal This paperhas benefitedfrom the commentsand suggestionsof AlbertAndo, Whitney Newey, and members of the Brookings Panel and from seminar presentationsat the Universityof Warwick,Princeton University, and Johns Hopkins University.We thank Peter Rathjensand Lori Gruninfor researchassistance and the National Science Foun- dationfor financialsupport. 1. Milton Friedman, A Theory of the Consumption Function (Princeton University Press, 1957); Franco Modigliani and Richard Brumberg, "Utility Analysis and the ConsumptionFunction: An Interpretationof Cross-SectionData," in KennethK. Kuri- hara, ed., Post-KeynesianEconomics (Rutgers University Press, 1954), pp. 388-436; AlbertAndo and FrancoModigliani, "The 'Life-Cycle'Hypothesis of Saving:Aggregate Implications and Tests," American Economic Review, vol. 53 (May 1963), pp. 55-84. 465 466 BrookingsPapers on EconomicActivity, 2:1985 propensityto consume out of transitoryincome, which was variously explained by a "short horizon" (that is, a high discount rate) or by liquidityconstraints. Thingsare quite differentnow. Developmentsin economic research, as well as actual events, have raised fundamentalquestions about the consumptionfunction. At the same time, the rangeof experience of the last dozen years has been great enough to hold out the hope of getting some answersfrom aggregate data. This seems, therefore,an auspicious time to take a fresh, and unabashedlyempirical, look at the time series consumptionfunction. Questions Raised by Modern Research The Lucas Critique. Reasons aboundfor questioningthe traditional consumption function and its implicationsfor how tax policy affects consumer spending. Robert Lucas has pointed out that, under rational expectations, the PIH does not lead to a "structural" relationship between consumptionand income, but ratherto a statisticalrelationship that should change whenever the stochastic process generatingincome changes. The Lucas critique calls for estimation methods that treat consumptionand incomejointly.2 The "Random Walk" Hypothesis. Robert Hall sharpened the impli- cations of the PIH by showingthat the rationalexpectations hypothesis impliesthat only "surprises"in permanentincome shouldaffect current consumption,once lagged consumptionis controlledfor.3 The work of Hall and Lucas added a new dichotomy-that between anticipated and unanticipatedchanges in income-to the traditional permanent-transitorydichotomy. It is this new dichotomy, ratherthan the old one, thathas absorbedthe attentionof contemporaryresearchers. Hall's work in particularhas spawned an infant industry estimating Euler equations linkingcurrent and lagged consumptionin the manner 2. RobertE. Lucas,Jr., "EconometricPolicy Evaluation: A Critique,"in KarlBrunner and Allan H. Meltzer, eds., The Phillips Curve and Labor Markets, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, vol. 1 (Amsterdam:North-Holland, 1976), pp. 19-46. 3. Robert E. Hall, "Stochastic Implicationsof the Life Cycle-PermanentIncome Hypothesis:Theory and Evidence," Journal of Political Economy, vol. 86 (December 1978), pp. 971-87. Alan S. Blinder and Angus Deaton 467 impliedby the first-orderconditions of a Fisherianintertemporal opti- mizationproblem. We have our doubts about the wisdom of modeling aggregateconsumption as the interior solution to a single individual's optimizationproblem in adjacentperiods,4 but in any case thinkit fairto say that the research done to date has not supportedthe econometric restrictions implied by the Euler equation approach. Nor has further investigationvalidated the hypothesisthat the response of consumption to income (henceforth, Y) reflects only the usefulness of current Y in predictingfuture Y. Instead, research typically finds "excess sensitivity" to currentincome.' But the case is by no means closed. So a central question of this study is whether informationknown at time t - 1, such as anticipatedincome, has any predictive power for changes in con- sumption between times t - 1 and t. The Barro Equivalence Hypothesis. A rather different objection to standardconsumption functions, based on the idea that private and government accounts should be consolidated, was raised by Robert Barro.6The income (that is, disposable income) and wealth (that is, household net worth, including government debt) variables normally used in consumptionfunctions imply that intertemporalshifts in the 4. Cornersolutions stemmingfrom liquidity constraints pose one problem.Aggregation poses others. For example, with mortal consumers, a constant age distributionof the population,and neithersurprises nor changesin interestrates, the ratioC,+ IC,(where C denotes consumption)would be 1 plus the growthrate of per capita income. The Euler equationapproach models the growthrate of consumptionas a functionof the interestrate andthe timediscount rate, and uses the observedgrowth rate to estimatethe intertemporal elasticityof substitution.Background growth of per capitaincome seems to be ignored. 5. MarjorieFlavin, "The Adjustment of Consumptionto ChangingExpectations about Future Income," Journal of Political Economy, vol. 89 (October 1981), pp. 974-1009; RobertE. Hall and FredericS. Mishkin,"The Sensitivityof Consumptionto Transitory Income:Estimates from Panel Data on Households,"Econometrica, vol.50 (March1982), pp. 461-81; Ben S. Bernanke,"Adjustment Costs, Durables,and AggregateConsump- tion,"Journal ofMonetaryEconomics, vol. 15(January 1985), pp. 41-68; Ben S. Bernanke, "PermanentIncome, Liquidity,and Expenditureon Automobiles:Evidence from Panel Data," QuarterlyJournal of Economics, vol. 99 (August 1984),pp. 587-614;N. Gregory Mankiw,Julio J. Rotemberg,and LawrenceH. Summers,"Intertemporal Substitution in Macroeconomics,"Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 100(February 1985), pp. 225- 51;Martin Browning, Angus Deaton, and Margaret Irish, "A ProfitableApproach to Labor Supply and CommodityDemands over the Life Cycle," Econometrica,vol. 53 (May 1985), pp. 503-43; Charles R. Bean, "The Estimation of 'Surprise' Models and the 'Surprise'Consumption Function," Discussion Paper 54 (Centerfor Economic Policy Research,February 1985). 6. Robert J. Barro, "Are GovernmentBonds Net Wealth?" Journal of Political Economy,vol. 82 (November-December1974), pp. 1095-1117. 468 BrookingsPapers on EconomicActivity, 2:1985 patternof taxes, with no change in their presentvalue, produce shifts in the time patternof consumption.This should not be so, Barroargued, if people can freely transferincome across generations. The Barro equivalence hypothesis is not theoreticallyunobjection- able. In addition to the usual perfect capital markets assumption, it requires that bequests be motivated by intergenerationalaltruism and thatpeople have extremelylong time horizons. It also has troubledealing with childless people or with the possibility of "corner solutions" in which the unconstrainedoptimal bequest cannot be enforcedbecause it is negative. Because of these and other problems,many economists find the equivalencehypothesis implausibleon a priorigrounds. But a priori reasoningis not the way to settle the issue, and empiricalstudies have foundit surprisinglydifficult to rejectthe equivalencehypothesis.7 More evidence would be welcome, and we try to obtain some below. Intertemporal Substitution. Modern macroeconomic analysis has reemphasized intertemporalsubstitution. Yet standard consumption functionsoften omit the rate of interestas an argument-not on theoret- ical grounds, but on empiricalgrounds. The consensus conclusion that consumption,and hence saving, is insensitive to the rate of returnhas been questioned by Michael Boskin and, more recently, by Lawrence Summers.8What do recent data say about this issue? 7. For some theoreticalarguments, see MartinS. Feldstein, "Perceived Wealth in Bonds and Social Security:A Comment,"Journal of Political Economy, vol. 84 (April 1976), pp. 331-36; Robert J. Barro, "Reply to Feldstein and Buchanan,"Journal of Political Economy, vol. 84 (April 1976), pp. 343-49; and Willem H. Buiter and James Tobin, "Debt Neutrality:A Brief Review of Doctrineand Evidence," in GeorgeM. von Furstenberg, ed., Social Security vs. Private Saving (Ballinger, 1979), pp. 39-64. The conclusionthat the empiricalevidence is mixedis reachedby KarlBrunner after a thorough review of the literature.See Brunner,"Fiscal Policy in Macro Theory: A Survey and Evaluation" (Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, January 1985). But both Roger C. Kormendi,in "GovernmentDebt,
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 17: Consumption 1

    Chapter 17: Consumption 1

    11/6/2013 Keynes’s conjectures Chapter 17: Consumption 1. 0 < MPC < 1 2. Average propensity to consume (APC) falls as income rises. (APC = C/Y ) 3. Income is the main determinant of consumption. CHAPTER 17 Consumption 0 CHAPTER 17 Consumption 1 The Keynesian consumption function The Keynesian consumption function As income rises, consumers save a bigger C C fraction of their income, so APC falls. CCcY CCcY c c = MPC = slope of the 1 CC consumption APC c C function YY slope = APC Y Y CHAPTER 17 Consumption 2 CHAPTER 17 Consumption 3 Early empirical successes: Problems for the Results from early studies Keynesian consumption function . Households with higher incomes: . Based on the Keynesian consumption function, . consume more, MPC > 0 economists predicted that C would grow more . save more, MPC < 1 slowly than Y over time. save a larger fraction of their income, . This prediction did not come true: APC as Y . As incomes grew, APC did not fall, . Very strong correlation between income and and C grew at the same rate as income. consumption: . Simon Kuznets showed that C/Y was income seemed to be the main very stable in long time series data. determinant of consumption CHAPTER 17 Consumption 4 CHAPTER 17 Consumption 5 1 11/6/2013 The Consumption Puzzle Irving Fisher and Intertemporal Choice . The basis for much subsequent work on Consumption function consumption. C from long time series data (constant APC ) . Assumes consumer is forward-looking and chooses consumption for the present and future to maximize lifetime satisfaction. Consumption function . Consumer’s choices are subject to an from cross-sectional intertemporal budget constraint, household data a measure of the total resources available for (falling APC ) present and future consumption.
  • The Principles of Economics Textbook

    The Principles of Economics Textbook

    The Principles of Economics Textbook: An Analysis of Its Past, Present & Future by Vitali Bourchtein An honors thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science Undergraduate College Leonard N. Stern School of Business New York University May 2011 Professor Marti G. Subrahmanyam Professor Simon Bowmaker Faculty Advisor Thesis Advisor Bourchtein 1 Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................4 Thank You .......................................................................................................................................4 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................5 Summary ..........................................................................................................................................5 Part I: Literature Review ..................................................................................................................6 David Colander – What Economists Do and What Economists Teach .......................................6 David Colander – The Art of Teaching Economics .....................................................................8 David Colander – What We Taught and What We Did: The Evolution of US Economic Textbooks (1830-1930) ..............................................................................................................10
  • Economic Thinking in an Age of Shared Prosperity

    Economic Thinking in an Age of Shared Prosperity

    BOOKREVIEW Economic Thinking in an Age of Shared Prosperity GRAND PURSUIT: THE STORY OF ECONOMIC GENIUS workingman’s living standards signaled the demise of the BY SYLVIA NASAR iron law and forced economists to recognize and explain the NEW YORK: SIMON & SCHUSTER, 2011, 558 PAGES phenomenon. Britain’s Alfred Marshall, popularizer of the microeconomic demand and supply curves still used today, REVIEWED BY THOMAS M. HUMPHREY was among the first to do so. He argued that competition among firms, together with their need to match their rivals’ distinctive feature of the modern capitalist cost cuts to survive, incessantly drives them to improve economy is its capacity to deliver sustainable, ever- productivity and to bid for now more productive and A rising living standards to all social classes, not just efficient workers. Such bidding raises real wages, allowing to a fortunate few. How does it do it, especially in the face labor to share with management and capital in the produc- of occasional panics, bubbles, booms, busts, inflations, tivity gains. deflations, wars, and other shocks that threaten to derail Marshall interpreted productivity gains as the accumula- shared rising prosperity? What are the mechanisms tion over time of relentless and continuous innumerable involved? Can they be improved by policy intervention? small improvements to final products and production Has the process any limits? processes. Joseph Schumpeter, who never saw an economy The history of economic thought is replete with that couldn’t be energized through unregulated credit- attempts to answer these questions. First came the pes- financed entrepreneurship, saw productivity gains as simists Thomas Malthus, David Ricardo, James Mill, and his emanating from radical, dramatic, transformative, discon- son John Stuart Mill who, on grounds that for millennia tinuous innovations that precipitate business cycles and wages had flatlined at near-starvation levels, denied that destroy old technologies, firms, and markets even as they universally shared progress was possible.
  • After the Phillips Curve: Persistence of High Inflation and High Unemployment

    After the Phillips Curve: Persistence of High Inflation and High Unemployment

    Conference Series No. 19 BAILY BOSWORTH FAIR FRIEDMAN HELLIWELL KLEIN LUCAS-SARGENT MC NEES MODIGLIANI MOORE MORRIS POOLE SOLOW WACHTER-WACHTER % FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF BOSTON AFTER THE PHILLIPS CURVE: PERSISTENCE OF HIGH INFLATION AND HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT Proceedings of a Conference Held at Edgartown, Massachusetts June 1978 Sponsored by THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF BOSTON THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF BOSTON CONFERENCE SERIES NO. 1 CONTROLLING MONETARY AGGREGATES JUNE, 1969 NO. 2 THE INTERNATIONAL ADJUSTMENT MECHANISM OCTOBER, 1969 NO. 3 FINANCING STATE and LOCAL GOVERNMENTS in the SEVENTIES JUNE, 1970 NO. 4 HOUSING and MONETARY POLICY OCTOBER, 1970 NO. 5 CONSUMER SPENDING and MONETARY POLICY: THE LINKAGES JUNE, 1971 NO. 6 CANADIAN-UNITED STATES FINANCIAL RELATIONSHIPS SEPTEMBER, 1971 NO. 7 FINANCING PUBLIC SCHOOLS JANUARY, 1972 NO. 8 POLICIES for a MORE COMPETITIVE FINANCIAL SYSTEM JUNE, 1972 NO. 9 CONTROLLING MONETARY AGGREGATES II: the IMPLEMENTATION SEPTEMBER, 1972 NO. 10 ISSUES .in FEDERAL DEBT MANAGEMENT JUNE 1973 NO. 11 CREDIT ALLOCATION TECHNIQUES and MONETARY POLICY SEPBEMBER 1973 NO. 12 INTERNATIONAL ASPECTS of STABILIZATION POLICIES JUNE 1974 NO. 13 THE ECONOMICS of a NATIONAL ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER SYSTEM OCTOBER 1974 NO. 14 NEW MORTGAGE DESIGNS for an INFLATIONARY ENVIRONMENT JANUARY 1975 NO. 15 NEW ENGLAND and the ENERGY CRISIS OCTOBER 1975 NO. 16 FUNDING PENSIONS: ISSUES and IMPLICATIONS for FINANCIAL MARKETS OCTOBER 1976 NO. 17 MINORITY BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT NOVEMBER, 1976 NO. 18 KEY ISSUES in INTERNATIONAL BANKING OCTOBER, 1977 CONTENTS Opening Remarks FRANK E. MORRIS 7 I. Documenting the Problem 9 Diagnosing the Problem of Inflation and Unemployment in the Western World GEOFFREY H.
  • Shopping Enjoyment and Obsessive-Compulsive Buying

    Shopping Enjoyment and Obsessive-Compulsive Buying

    European Journal of Business and Management www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1905 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2839 (Online) DOI: 10.7176/EJBM Vol.11, No.3, 2019 Young Buyers: Shopping Enjoyment and Obsessive-Compulsive Buying Ayaz Samo 1 Hamid Shaikh 2 Maqsood Bhutto 3 Fiza Rani 3 Fayaz Samo 2* Tahseen Bhutto 2 1.School of Business Administration, Shah Abdul Latif University, Khairpur, Sindh, Pakistan 2.School of Business Administration, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian, China 3.Sukkur Institute of Business Administration, Sindh, Pakistan Abstract The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the relationship between hedonic shopping motivations and obsessive- compulsive shopping behavior from youngsters’ perspective. The study is based on the survey of 615 young Chinese buyers (mean age=24) and analyzed through Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). The findings show that adventure seeking, gratification seeking, and idea shopping have a positive effect on obsessive-compulsive buying, whereas role shopping and value shopping have a negative effect on obsessive-compulsive buying. However, social shopping is found to be insignificant to obsessive-compulsive buying. The study has a number of implications. Marketers should display more information about latest trends and fashions, as young buyers are found to shop for ideas and information. Managers should design the layouts with more exciting and impressive features, as these buyers are found to shop for adventure and gratification. Salesmen should take greater care into consideration while offering them to buy products such as gifts, souvenir etc. for their dear ones, as these buyers are less likely to enjoy buying for others. Moreover, business managers should less rely on discount promotions, as this consumer segment is found to be less likely to shop for discounts and bargains.
  • What Role Does Consumer Sentiment Play in the U.S. Economy?

    What Role Does Consumer Sentiment Play in the U.S. Economy?

    The economy is mired in recession. Consumer spending is weak, investment in plant and equipment is lethargic, and firms are hesitant to hire unemployed workers, given bleak forecasts of demand for final products. Monetary policy has lowered short-term interest rates and long rates have followed suit, but consumers and businesses resist borrowing. The condi- tions seem ripe for a recovery, but still the economy has not taken off as expected. What is the missing ingredient? Consumer confidence. Once the mood of consumers shifts toward the optimistic, shoppers will buy, firms will hire, and the engine of growth will rev up again. All eyes are on the widely publicized measures of consumer confidence (or consumer sentiment), waiting for the telltale uptick that will propel us into the longed-for expansion. Just as we appear to be headed for a "double-dipper," the mood swing occurs: the indexes of consumer confi- dence register 20-point increases, and the nation surges into a prolonged period of healthy growth. oes the U.S. economy really behave as this fictional account describes? Can a shift in sentiment drive the economy out of D recession and back into good health? Does a lack of consumer confidence drag the economy into recession? What causes large swings in consumer confidence? This article will try to answer these questions and to determine consumer confidence’s role in the workings of the U.S. economy. ]effre9 C. Fuhrer I. What Is Consumer Sentitnent? Senior Econotnist, Federal Reserve Consumer sentiment, or consumer confidence, is both an economic Bank of Boston.
  • Flat Tax: an Overview of the Hall-Rabushka Proposal

    Flat Tax: an Overview of the Hall-Rabushka Proposal

    . Flat Tax: An Overview of the Hall-Rabushka Proposal James M. Bickley Specialist in Public Finance November 29, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov 98-529 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress c11173008 . Flat Tax: An Overview of the Hall-Rabushka Proposal Summary The President and leading Members of Congress have stated that fundamental tax reform is a major policy objective for the 112th Congress. The concept of replacing individual and corporate income taxes and estate and gift taxes with a flat rate consumption tax is one option to reform the U.S. tax system. The term “flat tax” is often associated with a proposal formulated by Robert E. Hall and Alvin Rabushka (H-R), two senior fellows at the Hoover Institution. In the 112th Congress, two bills have been introduced that included a flat tax based on the concepts of Hall- Rabushka: the Freedom Flat Tax Act (H.R. 1040) and the Simplified, Manageable, and Responsible Tax Act (S. 820). In addition, Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain has proposed a tax reform plan that includes a modified H-R flat tax. This report analyzes the Hall- Rabushka flat tax concept. Although the current tax structure is referred to as an income tax, it actually contains elements of both an income and a consumption-based tax. A consumption base is neither inherently superior nor inherently inferior to an income base. The combined individual and business taxes proposed by H-R can be viewed as a modified value- added tax (VAT). The individual wage tax would be imposed on wages (and salaries) and pension receipts.
  • An Interview with Franco Modigliani

    An Interview with Franco Modigliani

    THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS AN INTERVIEW WITH FRANCO MODIGLIANI Interviewed by William A. Barnett University of Kansas Robert Solow MIT THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS WORKING PAPER NUMBER 200407 Macroeconomic Dynamics, 4, 2000, 222–256. Printed in the United States of America. MD INTERVIEW AN INTERVIEW WITH FRANCO MODIGLIANI Interviewed by William A. Barnett Washington University in St. Louis and Robert Solow Massachusetts Institute of Technology November 5–6, 1999 Franco Modigliani’s contributions in economics and finance have transformed both fields. Although many other major contributions in those fields have come and gone, Modigliani’s contributions seem to grow in importance with time. His famous 1944 article on liquidity preference has not only remained required reading for generations of Keynesian economists but has become part of the vocabulary of all economists. The implications of the life-cycle hypothesis of consumption and saving provided the primary motivation for the incorporation of finite lifetime models into macroeconomics and had a seminal role in the growth in macroeconomics of the overlapping generations approach to modeling of Allais, Samuelson, and Diamond. Modigliani and Miller’s work on the cost of capital transformed corporate finance and deeply influenced subsequent research on investment, capital asset pricing, and recent research on derivatives. Modigliani received the Nobel Memorial Prize for Economics in 1985. In macroeconomic policy, Modigliani has remained influential on two continents. In the United States, he played a central role in the creation of a the Federal Re- serve System’s large-scale quarterly macroeconometric model, and he frequently participated in the semiannual meetings of academic consultants to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in Washington, D.C.
  • Chapter 3 the Basic OLG Model: Diamond

    Chapter 3 the Basic OLG Model: Diamond

    Chapter 3 The basic OLG model: Diamond There exists two main analytical frameworks for analyzing the basic intertem- poral choice, consumption versus saving, and the dynamic implications of this choice: overlapping-generations (OLG) models and representative agent models. In the first type of models the focus is on (a) the interaction between different generations alive at the same time, and (b) the never-ending entrance of new generations and thereby new decision makers. In the second type of models the household sector is modelled as consisting of a finite number of infinitely-lived dynasties. One interpretation is that the parents take the utility of their descen- dants into account by leaving bequests and so on forward through a chain of intergenerational links. This approach, which is also called the Ramsey approach (after the British mathematician and economist Frank Ramsey, 1903-1930), will be described in Chapter 8 (discrete time) and Chapter 10 (continuous time). In the present chapter we introduce the OLG approach which has shown its usefulness for analysis of many issues such as: public debt, taxation of capital income, financing of social security (pensions), design of educational systems, non-neutrality of money, and the possibility of speculative bubbles. We will focus on what is known as Diamond’sOLG model1 after the American economist and Nobel Prize laureate Peter A. Diamond (1940-). Among the strengths of the model are: The life-cycle aspect of human behavior is taken into account. Although the • economy is infinitely-lived, the individual agents are not. During lifetime one’s educational level, working capacity, income, and needs change and this is reflected in the individual labor supply and saving behavior.
  • CURRICULUM VITAE August, 2015

    CURRICULUM VITAE August, 2015

    CURRICULUM VITAE August, 2015 Robert James Shiller Current Position Sterling Professor of Economics Yale University Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics P.O. Box 208281 New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8281 Delivery Address Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics 30 Hillhouse Avenue, Room 11a New Haven, CT 06520 Home Address 201 Everit Street New Haven, CT 06511 Telephone 203-432-3708 Office 203-432-6167 Fax 203-787-2182 Home [email protected] E-mail http://www.econ.yale.edu/~shiller Home Page Date of Birth March 29, 1946, Detroit, Michigan Marital Status Married, two grown children Education 1967 B.A. University of Michigan 1968 S.M. Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1972 Ph.D. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Employment Sterling Professor of Economics, Yale University, 2013- Arthur M. Okun Professor of Economics, Yale University 2008-13 Stanley B. Resor Professor of Economics Yale University 1989-2008 Professor of Economics, Yale University, 1982-, with joint appointment with Yale School of Management 2006-, Professor Adjunct of Law in semesters starting 2006 Visiting Professor, Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1981-82. Professor of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, and Professor of Finance, The Wharton School, 1981-82. Visitor, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, and Visiting Scholar, Department of Economics, Harvard University, 1980-81. Associate Professor, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, 1974-81. 1 Research Fellow, National Bureau of Economic Research, Research Center for Economics and Management Science, Cambridge; and Visiting Scholar, Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1974-75. Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, University of Minnesota, 1972-74.
  • AP Macroeconomics: Vocabulary 1. Aggregate Spending (GDP)

    AP Macroeconomics: Vocabulary 1. Aggregate Spending (GDP)

    AP Macroeconomics: Vocabulary 1. Aggregate Spending (GDP): The sum of all spending from four sectors of the economy. GDP = C+I+G+Xn 2. Aggregate Income (AI) :The sum of all income earned by suppliers of resources in the economy. AI=GDP 3. Nominal GDP: the value of current production at the current prices 4. Real GDP: the value of current production, but using prices from a fixed point in time 5. Base year: the year that serves as a reference point for constructing a price index and comparing real values over time. 6. Price index: a measure of the average level of prices in a market basket for a given year, when compared to the prices in a reference (or base) year. 7. Market Basket: a collection of goods and services used to represent what is consumed in the economy 8. GDP price deflator: the price index that measures the average price level of the goods and services that make up GDP. 9. Real rate of interest: the percentage increase in purchasing power that a borrower pays a lender. 10. Expected (anticipated) inflation: the inflation expected in a future time period. This expected inflation is added to the real interest rate to compensate for lost purchasing power. 11. Nominal rate of interest: the percentage increase in money that the borrower pays the lender and is equal to the real rate plus the expected inflation. 12. Business cycle: the periodic rise and fall (in four phases) of economic activity 13. Expansion: a period where real GDP is growing. 14. Peak: the top of a business cycle where an expansion has ended.
  • Consumption Growth Parallels Income Growth: Some New Evidence

    Consumption Growth Parallels Income Growth: Some New Evidence

    This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: National Saving and Economic Performance Volume Author/Editor: B. Douglas Bernheim and John B. Shoven, editors Volume Publisher: University of Chicago Press Volume ISBN: 0-226-04404-1 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/bern91-2 Conference Date: January 6-7, 1989 Publication Date: January 1991 Chapter Title: Consumption Growth Parallels Income Growth: Some New Evidence Chapter Author: Christopher D. Carroll, Lawrence H. Summers Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c5995 Chapter pages in book: (p. 305 - 348) 10 Consumption Growth Parallels Income Growth: Some New Evidence Christopher D. Carroll and Lawrence H. Summers 10.1 Introduction The idea that consumers allocate their consumption over time so as to max- imize a stable individualistic utility function provides the basis for almost all modem work on the determinants of consumption and saving decisions. The celebrated life-cycle and permanent income hypotheses represent not so much alternative theories of consumption as alternative empirical strategies for fleshing out the same basic idea. While tests of particular implementations of these theories sometimes lead to statistical rejections, life-cycle/permanent income theories succeed in unifying a wide range of diverse phenomena. It is probably fair to accept Franc0 Modigliani’s ( 1980) characterization that “the Life Cycle Hypothesis has proved a very fruitful hypothesis, capable of inte- grating a large variety of facts concerning individual and aggregate saving behaviour.” This paper argues, however, that both permanent income and, to an only slightly lesser extent, life-cycle theories as they have come to be implemented in recent years are inconsistent with the grossest features of cross-country and cross-section data on consumption and income and income growth.