Lesson 10.Pages
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Preferred Levels for Background Ducking to Produce Esthetically Pleasing Audio for TV with Clear Speech” J
PAPERS M. Torcoli, A. Freke-Morin, J. Paulus, C. Simon, and B. Shirley, “Preferred Levels for Background Ducking to Produce Esthetically Pleasing Audio for TV with Clear Speech” J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 67, no. 12, pp. 1003–1011, (2019 December.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17743/jaes.2019.0052 Preferred Levels for Background Ducking to Produce Esthetically Pleasing Audio for TV with Clear Speech , MATTEO TORCOLI,1 AES Member, ALEX FREKE-MORIN,1 2 AES Associate Member, ([email protected]) ([email protected]) , JOUNI PAULUS1 3, CHRISTIAN SIMON,1 AES Associate Member, AND ([email protected]) ([email protected]) BEN SHIRLEY,2 AES Member ([email protected]) 1Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Circuits IIS, Erlangen, Germany 2Acoustics Research Centre, University of Salford, UK 3International Audio Laboratories Erlangen, Germany, A joint institution of Universitat¨ Erlangen-Nurnberg¨ and Fraunhofer IIS. In audio production, background ducking facilitates speech intelligibility while allowing the background to fulfill its purpose, e.g., to create ambience, set the mood, or convey seman- tic cues. Technical details for recommended ducking practices are not currently documented in the literature. Hence, we first analyzed common practices found in TV documentaries. Second, a listening test investigated the preferences of 22 normal-hearing participants on the Loudness Difference (LD) between commentary and background during ducking. Highly personal preferences were observed, highlighting the importance of object-based personaliza- tion. Statistically significant difference was found between non-expert and expert listeners. On average, non-experts preferred LDs that were 4 LU higher than the ones preferred by experts. -
Ministudio PERSONAL US-32
D01288520D MiNiSTUDIO PERSONAL US-32 OWNER'S MANUAL IMPORTANT SAFETY PRECAUTIONS This product complies with the European Directives request and the For U.S.A. other Commission Regulations. INFORMATION TO THE USER This equipment has been tested and found to comply with the limits for a Class B digital device, pursuant to Part 15 of the FCC Rules. These limits are designed to provide reasonable protection against harmful inter- ference in a residential installation. This equipment generates, uses, and can radiate radio frequency energy and, if not installed and used in accordance with the instruction manual, may cause harmful interference to radio communications. However, there is no guarantee that interference will not occur in a particular installation. If this equipment does cause harmful interference to radio or television reception, which can be determined by turning the equipment off and on, the user is encouraged to try to correct the interference by one or more of the following Nameplate measures. a) Reorient or relocate the receiving antenna. b) Increase the separation between the equipment and receiver. c) Connect the equipment into an outlet on a circuit different from that to which the receiver is connected. IMPORTANT SAFETY INSTRUCTIONS d) Consult the dealer or an experienced radio/TV 1 Read these instructions. technician for help. 2 Keep these instructions. CAUTION 3 Heed all warnings. Changes or modifications to this equipment not 4 Follow all instructions. expressly approved by TEAC CORPORATION for 5 Do not use this apparatus near water. compliance could void the user’s authority to operate 6 Clean only with dry cloth. -
Ds101 Noise Gate for the 500 Series Rack System
DRAWMER DS101 NOISE GATE FOR THE 500 SERIES RACK SYSTEM CONTENTS Warranty . 2 Safety Consideration . 2 Radio Frequencies Statement . 2 Chapter 1 - Introduction Introduction . 3 Installation . 4 Audio Connection . 4 Typical Connection Guide . 5 Chapter 2 - Control Description The Gate Controls . 6 The Key Filters . 8 Quick Start Guide . 9 Noise Gate Operation . .10 Chapter 3 - General Information If a fault develops. 15 Contacting Drawmer . .15 Specification. 15 Block Diagram. 16 Session Recall Sheet . 17 DRAWMER COPYRIGHT This manual is copyrighted © 2012 by Drawmer Electronics Ltd. With all rights reserved. Under copyright laws, no part of this publication may be reproduced, transmitted, stored in a retrieval system or translated into any language in any form by any means, mechanical, optical, electronic, recording, or otherwise, without the written permission of Drawmer Electronics Ltd. ONE YEAR LIMITED WARRANTY Drawmer Electronics Ltd., warrants the Drawmer DS101 Noise Gate For the USA to conform substantially to the specifications of this manual for a period of one year from the original date of purchase when used in FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION RADIO accordance with the specifications detailed in this manual. In the FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE STATEMENT case of a valid warranty claim, your sole and exclusive remedy and This equipment has been tested and found to comply with the limits Drawmer’s entire liability under any theory of liability will be to, at for a Class B digital device, pursuant to Part 15 of the FCC Rules. Drawmer’s discretion, repair or replace the product without charge, These limits are designed to provide reasonable protection against or, if not possible, to refund the purchase price to you. -
User's Manual
USER’S MANUAL G-Force GUITAR EFFECTS PROCESSOR IMPORTANT SAFETY INSTRUCTIONS The lightning flash with an arrowhead symbol The exclamation point within an equilateral triangle within an equilateral triangle, is intended to alert is intended to alert the user to the presence of the user to the presence of uninsulated "dan- important operating and maintenance (servicing) gerous voltage" within the product's enclosure that may instructions in the literature accompanying the product. be of sufficient magnitude to constitute a risk of electric shock to persons. 1 Read these instructions. Warning! 2 Keep these instructions. • To reduce the risk of fire or electrical shock, do not 3 Heed all warnings. expose this equipment to dripping or splashing and 4 Follow all instructions. ensure that no objects filled with liquids, such as vases, 5 Do not use this apparatus near water. are placed on the equipment. 6 Clean only with dry cloth. • This apparatus must be earthed. 7 Do not block any ventilation openings. Install in • Use a three wire grounding type line cord like the one accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. supplied with the product. 8 Do not install near any heat sources such • Be advised that different operating voltages require the as radiators, heat registers, stoves, or other use of different types of line cord and attachment plugs. apparatus (including amplifiers) that produce heat. • Check the voltage in your area and use the 9 Do not defeat the safety purpose of the polarized correct type. See table below: or grounding-type plug. A polarized plug has two blades with one wider than the other. -
Using Equalization on HF SSB
Using Equalization on HF SSB Bill Leonard NØCU 4/27/2010 1 Topics: •Some Commonly Used Methods for Improving HF SSB Comms •Some key points about speech and hearing •The W2IHY 8 Band Equalizer + Noise Gate •What is it •When to use it •Where to use it •How to use it •What it can, and cannot do 4/27/2010 2 What is “communication”? •Communication Transfer of Information •What is “information transfer”? •CW •Digital comms •SSB Voice Different modes require different •Rag-chew methods to optimize information transfer •Breaking DX pile-ups •FM Voice 4/27/2010 3 What can we do to improve our ability to communicate via HF SSB? Typical communication path Processor Voice Mic EQ Xmtr Rcvr EQ Spkr Ear (Brain) .. .. Typical Why Not Here? Location 4/27/2010 4 Some Commonly Used Methods for Improving HF SSB Comms: 1. Improve received SNR: •Use higher gain antennas •Use higher peak transmitter power •Raise average transmit power (compression) •There is a limit: trade-off between distortion vs. SNR improvement •Some (W2IHY) claim that straight compression can degrade transmit SNR •I question this claim (all limiters exhibit “small signal suppression”) •Compression will increase background noise when no speech signal is present •Use of a Noise Gate should mitigate this problem •“Matched Filter” detection: •“Matching” filters means more than just reducing bandwidth arbitrarily •There is a limit: trade-off between distortion vs. SNR improvement •A 10 Hz filter won’t work very well with a 60 wpm CW signal •Reducing receiver noise figure will not help when atmospheric noise is dominant 4/27/2010 5 Some Commonly Used Methods for Improving HF SSB Comms (continued): 1. -
Products of Interest
Products of Interest Neat Microphones Bee Range 134 dB (at 2.5K ohms) and a maxi- and the Bumblebee for US$ 199. mum SPL of 140 dB (at 2.5K ohms and Contact: Neat Microphones; Web The new Bee range from Neat Mi- 0.5 percent total harmonic distortion neatmic.com. crophones includes condenser mi- [THD]). The signal-to-noise ratio is crophones with large and medium 89 dB (A weighted). It measures 216 × diaphragms, as well as a desktop USB 76 mm and weighs 785 g. Shure MOTIV Microphone Range microphone. The King Bee is a large The Worker Bee is a similar but diaphragm condenser microphone lower cost microphone with a smaller Shure has released a new range of digi- with Class A discrete electronics, 25-mm capsule. It offers the user tal microphones that connect directly designed for high-sensitivity and a frequency response of 20 Hz to to computers, laptops, and iOS de- low-noise recording (see Figure 1). It 20 kHz. The dynamic range and SPL vices (see Figure 2). Among this range features a 34-mm center-terminated, are slightly higher at 135.5 dB and is the MV88, a digital stereo con- gold-sputtered condenser capsule 145 dB, respectively. The signal-to- denser microphone for iOS devices, with external polarization. The polar noise ratio for this microphone is which connects directly using the pattern is cardioid. The microphone 79 dB (A weighted). It measures 152 × Lightning connector. It is mounted offers a frequency response of 16 Hz 76 mm and weighs 446 g. -
A History of Audio Effects
applied sciences Review A History of Audio Effects Thomas Wilmering 1,∗ , David Moffat 2 , Alessia Milo 1 and Mark B. Sandler 1 1 Centre for Digital Music, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK; [email protected] (A.M.); [email protected] (M.B.S.) 2 Interdisciplinary Centre for Computer Music Research, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 16 December 2019; Accepted: 13 January 2020; Published: 22 January 2020 Abstract: Audio effects are an essential tool that the field of music production relies upon. The ability to intentionally manipulate and modify a piece of sound has opened up considerable opportunities for music making. The evolution of technology has often driven new audio tools and effects, from early architectural acoustics through electromechanical and electronic devices to the digitisation of music production studios. Throughout time, music has constantly borrowed ideas and technological advancements from all other fields and contributed back to the innovative technology. This is defined as transsectorial innovation and fundamentally underpins the technological developments of audio effects. The development and evolution of audio effect technology is discussed, highlighting major technical breakthroughs and the impact of available audio effects. Keywords: audio effects; history; transsectorial innovation; technology; audio processing; music production 1. Introduction In this article, we describe the history of audio effects with regards to musical composition (music performance and production). We define audio effects as the controlled transformation of a sound typically based on some control parameters. As such, the term sound transformation can be considered synonymous with audio effect. -
KEMPER PROFILER Addendum 8.6 Legal Notice
KEMPER PROFILER Addendum 8.6 Legal Notice This manual, as well as the software and hardware described in it, is furnished under license and may be used or copied only in accordance with the terms of such license. The content of this manual is furnished for informational use only, is subject to change without notice and should not be construed as a commitment by Kemper GmbH. Kemper GmbH assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or inaccuracies that may appear in this book. Except as permitted by such license, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, recording, by smoke signals or otherwise without the prior written permission of Kemper GmbH. KEMPER™, PROFILER™, PROFILE™, PROFILING™, PROFILER PowerHead™, PROFILER PowerRack™, PROFILER Stage™, PROFILER Remote™, KEMPER Kone™, KEMPER Kabinet™, KEMPER Power Kabinet™, KEMPER Rig Exchange™, KEMPER Rig Manager™, PURE CABINET™, and CabDriver™ are trademarks of Kemper GmbH. All features and specifications are subject to change without notice. (Rev. September 2021). © Copyright 2021 Kemper GmbH. All rights reserved. www.kemper-amps.com Table of Contents What is new? 1 What is new in version 8.6? 2 Double Tracker 2 Acoustic Simulator Enhancements 3 Auto Swell Sensitivity 3 PROFILER Stage Wi-Fi Enhancement 4 What is new in version 8.5? 5 Important Hints for Users of KEMPER Power Kabinet 5 KEMPER Rig Manager for iOS®* 6 Wi-Fi with PROFILER Stage 9 What is new in version 8.2? 11 Power Amp -
User Manual M32 User Manual
User Manual M32 Digital Console for Live and Studio with 40 Input Channels, 32 MIDAS Microphone Preamplifiers and 25 Mix Buses 2 M32 User Manual Table of Contents Precautions ..................................................................... 4 Introduction.................................................................... 5 1. Control Surface .......................................................... 6 1.1 Channel Strip - Input Channels ...................................... 6 1.2 Channel Strip - Group/Bus Channels ........................... 7 1.3 Config/Preamp .................................................................... 8 1.4 Gate .......................................................................................... 8 1.5 Dynamics ............................................................................... 9 1.6 Equaliser ................................................................................. 9 1.7 Bus Sends ............................................................................. 10 1.8 Main Bus ............................................................................... 11 1.9 RECORDER ........................................................................... 11 1.10 Main Display (Summary) .............................................. 12 1.11 Monitor ............................................................................... 13 1.12 Talkback .............................................................................. 15 1.13 Show Control ................................................................... -
Download PDF of This Issue
build a Ital transposer TIGER .01 Introduced three years ago, our "Tiger .01" is still one of the finest amplifiers available in its power class. This amplifier introduced our 100% complementary circuit which has become a standard feature in many of the better amplifiers. This combined with an output triple produces a circuit that can honestly be rated as having less than .01% IM distortion at any level up to 60 Watts. Relatively low open loop gain and a conservative amount of negative feedback results in clean overload charac teristics and good TIM characteristics. Other features are volt-amp output limiting, plus three fuses and an overheat thermostat. Despite the "budget” price an output meter is standard equipment. Each channel measures 4% x 5 x 14. Four will mount in a stan dard width relay rack for four channel systems. SPECIFICATIONS 60 Watts—4.0 or 8.0 Ohm load Minimum RMS from 20 Hz to 20 KHz with less than .05% Total Harmonic Distortion. IM Distortion .................................................................... less than .01% Damping Factor . ...................... 50 or greater 20 Hz to20,000 Hz. Southwest Technical Products Corp. Hum and N o is e .....................................................................................-90 dB 219 W. Rhapsody, Dept. FM -# 20 7 /B Am plifier (single ch an n e l)..............................$ 1 10.0 0 PPd San Antonio, Texas 78216 # 207/B Amplifier — K it ....................................................$ 77 .50 PPd Would you believe a high quality preamp and control center for less than $75.00?? Well it's true. With a few hours work you can assemble our #198 preamp kit and have a unit equal to, or superior to products costing three, or four times this amount. -
Timbre Preferences in the Context of Mixing Music
applied sciences Article Timbre Preferences in the Context of Mixing Music Felix A. Dobrowohl *, Andrew J. Milne and Roger T. Dean The MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia; [email protected] (A.J.M.); [email protected] (R.T.D.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-2-9772-6585 Received: 21 March 2019; Accepted: 16 April 2019; Published: 24 April 2019 Abstract: Mixing music is a highly complex task. This is exacerbated by the fact that timbre perception is still poorly understood. As a result, few studies have been able to pinpoint listeners’ preferences in terms of timbre. In order to investigate timbre preference in a music production context, we let participants mix multiple individual parts of musical pieces (bassline, harmony, and arpeggio parts, all sounded with a synthesizer) by adjusting four specific timbral attributes of the synthesizer (lowpass, sawtooth/square wave oscillation blend, distortion, and inharmonicity). After participants mixed all parts of a musical piece, they were asked to rate multiple mixes of the same musical piece. Listeners showed preferences for their own mixes over random, fixed sawtooth, or expert mixes. However, participants were unable to identify their own mixes. Despite not being able to accurately identify their own mixes, participants consistently preferred the mix they thought to be their own, regardless of whether or not this mix was indeed their own. Correlations and cluster analysis of the participants’ mixing settings show most participants behaving independently in their mixing approaches and one moderate sized cluster of participants who are actually rather similar. -
Understanding Compressors and Compression by Barry Rudolph
Understanding Compressors and Compression by Barry Rudolph Back To The Home Page This "mirrored" page is published through the kind permission of MIX Magazine and Intertec Publishing. Visit MIX Magazine's WEB Site at: http://www.mixonline.com Mail A Link To This Page To A Friend! Download A Printer-Ready Copy Of This Review. You'll Need A Free Acrobat PDF Viewer Plug-In For Your Browser. Compression is one of the most common processes in all audio work, yet the compressor is one of the least understood and most misused processors. Compressed audio is an everyday fact of modern life, with the sound of records, telephones, TV, radios and public address systems all undergoing some type of mandatory dynamic range modification. The use of compressors can make Illustration: Tim Gleason pop recordings or live sound mixes sound musically better by controlling maximum levels and maintaining higher average loudness. It is the intent of this article to explain compressors and the process of compression so that you can use this powerful process in a more creative and deliberate way. Compressors and limiters are specialized amplifiers used to reduce dynamic range--the span between the softest and loudest sounds. All sound sources have different dynamic ranges or peak-to-average proportions. An alto flute produces a tone with only about a 3dB difference between the peak level and the average level. The human voice (depending on the particular person) has a 10dB dynamic range, while a plucked or percussive instrument may have a 15dB or more difference. Our own ears, by way of complex physiological processes, do a fine job of compressing by responding to roughly the average loudness of a sound.