Virtual Summer Camp Brainstorm

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Virtual Summer Camp Brainstorm Virtual Camp: Possible Template Outline for each Day/”Unit” for a Week of 3-4 hour days. Following the pace and rhythms of MOOC courses, to me, it pans out that a 4 hour class feels needed to prep for a Friday virtual competition. That seems too long for middle school, no? What if we offer 3 hours in the morning, and an hour check in for the afternoon? Optional? This could buoy students less accustomed to unsupervised study time, whatever their parents’ wages. : ) Possible ex. for 1 week PF introduction course: Pre-course self-survey ם My level as a reader/writer/researcher ם .My level as a debater ם Overview of Unit 1/Day 1 Goals and Motivation: Argument vs. Opinions, So What? .Pre-learning Post: Quick-prompts to engage prior learning ם (Essentials of Argumentation CWI, (like Common Core’s CER or R-A-C-E x2 ם Reading or Powerpoint or Video/Guest Speaker or audio (!Complete worksheet models (See pre-mailed Debater’s Power-Pack ם ?Break Out Rooms Activity: Pair share an arguments. Whose is stronger? Why ם Return to “classroom” and share-out best examples. Essentials of Speaking in a Civilized public forum: Growth Mindset vs. Fixed, Hostile Competing ם (We can vary these comparative videos of speakers based on age and course level! I have already found some online, but we might make our own for other leveled examples.) Reading Powerpoint Video/Guest Speaker Audio .TRY IT! Handout Create a “Growth Mindset” rubric for yourself as a public forum speaker ם Use the grid graphic organizer in your Debater’s Power Pack! We will keep adding to this, too! :KEY CONCEPTS TO UNDERSTAND ם The All-important Missing LINK: “You’re only as strong as your weakest links.” Essential to debate clashing refutation. Audio TRY IT! Break Out Rooms & Debater’s Power Pack “practice topic playing cards” Sort the cards on the topic by side (pro/con), then by CWI. All call out and help each other as a ם group, then decide which argument has stronger links and why. What could make the link “chain” or “story” stronger? ?Optional: (Ex. Go to QUIZLET link. Play vocabulary game matching lesson’s terms. How fast ם Or, for higher level readers, instead of a pre-mailed argument sort, have a webquest to a link or 2 and have them find the CWI embedded in an article. Do 2 and compare in groups? Final Reflection Posts ם !Tasks for tomorrow ם Marketing Pitch for VALUE ADDED of a Virtual Debate Camp: Along with strengthening the priceless 3Rs of debate skills: reading/research/reasoning, the miracle of a virtual mode more than makes up for what’s lost by thwarted social contact. Smaller, more intensely-focused tutorial “labs” heighten monitoring and adaptation for each individual’s great leap forward—especially for research and writing skills. We hew closely to the Common Core Standards for argumentation and critical literacy. An immersive tech environment ramps up each students’personal “band width,” deepening competencies in media communications, increased source access, search skills, and more. Most importantly, the ZOOM platform—with its break out rooms and chat messaging—enhances our ability to nurture socio-emotional learning: from self-management in organization and focus, to social-awareness and relationship-building. These vital skills build the resilience needed in this competitive, shame-prone world. NYCUDL Debate Skills Curriculum Sequence Topics Learning Outcomes Activities Introductions community building Icebreakers, (Pair talk- 2 mins. non-stop on favorite activities, then switch, then debate’s benefits –all (Teachers model: speak of favorite without saying “um” or “like”) things, great debaters, why debate) Introduction to Public Rhetoric: Pathos, Ethos, Logos Fun topics, assess baseline comfort & thinking styles. Speaking (ex. no dogs in NYC, free college.) Eye Contact, Gestures, Volume Emotion, Posture Introduction to Claim, Data, Warrant, links, Impact Model CWI with theater games (car keys, bus seat) Argumentation Toulmin model Who should be allowed in the shelter during flood/ zombie apocalypse?(doctor, expecting mother IT, etc.) Give CWI examples in pairs Role debate: “ Jack in the Beanstalk” Links & Impacts Cause & Effect Fill in the link “story” for Links an link chains C=Permit dogs in apts. since they help us. I=Heart rate improvement extends life expectancy. C=increase biking lanes …. I=Global warming is causing species extinction Introduction to Public Order/purpose of Speeches Practice Mini Round w/ fun topic (total 45 min) Forum Debate Pro Con Constructive speeches (ex. tell on a friend; uniforms, pay students for perfect school attendance) Split to 2 teams, 1 per speech (8). Rebuttal Speeches, Cross Fire 1/2 times & 1 min. prep for each speech. All flow. Summary Speeches, Final Focus Introduction to the Rotates with evidence-based focus or Discuss key terms in the resolution Topics text set units, student vote, final performance or tournament topic. Explain important background info on the topic Begin to brainstorm arguments Introduction to Closed/Open Ended Questioning Skills and tips for effective cross-fire Questioning Using all your Questioning Time Game: Defend a Lie (Student chooses a lie. Other students ask them crossfire questions about it) Short & Simple Questions Socratic Method Practice crossfire using the next debate topic. Research With each new debate topic, research Research will be scaffolded becoming gradually skills deepen. independent, from key evidence “cards” or quotes to sort and rank, to articles with pro and con evidence, to Key sources, primary vs. secondary, embedded pro & con in same article, sorting and finding own most relevant evidence in cite author/quoted expert credentials articles. Wikipedia tips, key sources, Search tips, card & tag, Block writing research is most challenging. It seeks specific evidence as an A2 or Answer to or Frontline Scientific studies & methodologies to very challenging counter claims. Peer reviewed Case speech and case Case speech writing v. writing a file Strong and weak models shown. file writing (A2 expected counterclaims) Practice note taking by listening to model speeches. Organization of speech (and music to warm up & for fun!) (hook, CW links to Impact) Sentence starters and template outlines for first case speech writing. Strong A2 Frontline defenses Match paragraphs to speeches and A2 cards to Pithy, catchy phrases: challenging Counter Claim blocks. Ex.Mend it, don’t end it Clash & Refutation Clash v. 2 boats pass in the night! Game: Claim/Counterclaim Catch: offer offensive or defensive argument to a statement, claim or Attack, Outweigh, Not Root cause, counterclaim. Non-Unique “Turn” Offensive v. Defensive Arguments Yes, But… Block, Frontline, Extension. Signpost 90 second survival 4 Step Refutation - They Say, We Say, Because, Therefore prefer Rebuttals and the Art Storytelling, Weighing, Impact Pair share practice, “Redos” of a round speech, of Storytelling Calculation, Crystallize, Framework Impact Calculus games: car crash vs. meteor strike MRT Magnitude, Risk/Probability Public Speaking Rotating throughout, drills to build Games: Students talk for 2-3 min. or more without confidence and skills of public filler words (um, like, uh) & goal setting speaking. Model video clips (Obama) Elicit good speaking techniques. Students give an alternate ending to a well-known movie/book, and other students try to distract them Model/celebrate debate goals they have met and will meet. Be specific! *Make a topic turn be on goals for themselves. These cannot be to “win” a round! Be specific. Judging a round Speaker points criteria. Throughout, students will be handling self-reflection checklists on their own growth in debate skills. Round winning criteria. Contrast video clips of speakers, flow & score them. Judge RFDs Reason for Decision Watch just final speeches clip of a round and practice flowing, scoring speakers, discerning winner. .
Recommended publications
  • Debate Tips & Tricks
    Debate Tips & Tricks – Rhode Island Urban Debate League 2019/02/14 623 Home About Us ∠ For Debaters & Coaches ∠ News & Events ∠ Join the Movement Debate Tips & Tricks Partners & Partner Supporters: Schools: Alvarez Central Click Here to download Debate 101: This is a helpful guide to Policy Debate written by Bill & Will Smelko detailing everything 3 you need to know from Rudiments of Rhetoric to Debate Theory. E 5 tips to help you win Juanita every debate round: Sanchez 1. Think as if you were your judge, not yourself. Remember, the only person whose opinion matters at Mount the end of the round is the judge’s, not yours! A Pleasant common mistake everyone in public speaking makes is assuming that because you understand the argument that your audience does as well. Take into account the Paul Cuffee judge’s debate experience before using a lot of debate http://www.riudl.org/debate-tips-tricks/ Page 1 of 4 Debate Tips & Tricks – Rhode Island Urban Debate League 2019/02/14 623 lingo, and make sure you look up at your judge while making a key point. This will both reinforce your argument because of the eye contact you will make, and it will allow you to look for signals from the judge (ie, Woonsocket shaking her head) that she understands you. 2. Always think comparatively. Every argument that you make, at the end of the round, will be compared against something the other team said. If you’re affirmative, for example, you should always be thinking in the mindset of “how does my plan compare to the status quo?” [i.e., doing nothing, what the negative frequently advocates].
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Programs Summer 2020
    Summer Programs Summer 2020 Summer Enrichment Programs MXGlobal Recommended Programs Felsted International Summer School http://www.felsted.org/SummerSeniorCampus The Felsted School in Felsted, England offers a summer program that gives students a taste of British boarding school life with a focus on Global Studies through stimulating lessons, fun activities and cultural experiences. St. Mark’s Global Citzenship Institute http://www.stmarksschool.org/gci St. Mark's School and Salzburg Global Seminar Faculty join together for a week of intensive exploration of what it means to be a global citizen in a globalized, interconnected 21st Century world. Participants will hear leaders in the field talk about the issues related to Global Citizenship and will participate in numerous small group discussions focusing on the themes of Global Citizenship. Art/Music/Writing/Journalism Programs American University – School of Communications www.audiscover.org Discover the world of communications in professional, hands-on summer workshops. A wide range of courses are offered in the areas of Film Video and Photography, Writing, Journalism & Broadcasting, and Communication. Berklee College of Music www.berklee.edu/summer/ Berklee offers five- to twelve-week programs that focus on performance, music theory, recording sessions, song writing, and specific instruments. Boston University Visual Arts Summer Institute, Summer Theatre Institute and Media Production https://www.bu.edu/mysummer/arts/visual-arts-summer-institute/ https://www.bu.edu/mysummer/arts/summer-theatre-institute/ https://www.bu.edu/mysummer/arts/academy-of-media-production/ BU offers an intensive four-week visual art program designed to help students build their art portfolios for the college process.
    [Show full text]
  • Page Sub-Page Type Title Learning Goals (Students Will Be Able To...) Attachment One Attachment Two Attachment Three
    Page Sub-page Type Title Learning Goals (Students will be able to...) Attachment One Attachment Two Attachment Three Coaching Coaching 10-Minute Speaker Short Activities Resources Resources Roles Practice Coaching Before, Coaching Coaching Best Practice During, and After Resources Resources Document Tournaments Coaching Coaching Best Practice Coaching Resources Resources Document Fundamentals Coaching Coaching Best Practice Coaching the Resources Resources Document Affirmative Coaching Coaching Best Practice Coaching the Resources Resources Document Negative Coaching Coaching Glossary-of-Debate- Document Resources Resources Terms Coaching Coaching Best Practice Ideas for Culture and Resources Resources Document Norm Building Coaching Coaching Quick Speech Short Activities Resources Resources Activities Short Speaking Coaching Coaching Short Activities Games for the First Resources Resources Few Practices Coaching Student 1NC Block Template Note Sheet Resources Resources for Topicality Coaching Student Template 8.5 11 Flowsheet Resources Resources Coaching Student Template 8.5 14 Flowsheet Resources Resources Coaching Student Debate Observer Note Sheet Resources Resources Debrief Worksheet Coaching Student Debate Terms Document Resources Resources Glossary Coaching Student Guide for Novice Document Resources Resources Policy Debaters Coaching Student Topicality Note Sheet Resources Resources Worksheet Tournament 1 Coaching Student Checklist Checklist for Resources Resources Students Coaching Coach IT Video Edit Student Records Resources Introduction to Coaching Coach IT Video Speechwire for Resources Coaches Coaching Registering for Coach IT Video Resources Tournaments Coaching Coach IT Video Roster Management Resources Team Reporting Coaching Coach IT Video from Tabroom to Resources Your UDL - directly respond to specific arguments. - generate arguments under time constraints. Debate Lesson Argumentation Lesson Chain Debates Library ▪ Respond to oral arguments with direct refutation.
    [Show full text]
  • Beg. CX Robertson-Markham
    Jonathan Robertson, Sudan H.S. and James Markham, Anton H.S. An Introduction to UIL CX Debate UIL WTAMU SAC - September 23rd, 2017 Beatriz Melendez and Jose Luis Melendez, 2-A UIL CX Debate State Champions 2016 “You can do it!” -The Waterboy Introduction - Brief video as students and coaches enter: (Debate class video) What is CX Debate? Policy debate. Policy = evidence. Lots of evidence. This event will change your life. One student’s story that ends submerged. So, are you ready to “Suit Up”? The Resolution: Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially increase its funding and/or regulation of elementary and/or secondary education in the United States. “Debate is blood sport, only your weapons are words.” 2 - Denzel Washington in The Great Debaters The Speeches and their Times: 1st Affirmative Constructive (1AC=8 min) CX (3 min by the 2NC) (never use prep time before CX periods) 1st Negative Constructive (1NC=8 min) CX (3 min by the 1AC) 2nd Affirmative Constructive (2AC=8 min) CX (3 min by the 1NC) 2nd Negative Constructive (2NC=8 min) (2NC + 1NR = Negative Block) CX (3 min by the 2AC) 1st Negative Rebuttal(1NR=5 min) 1st Affirmative Rebuttal (1AR=5 min) 2nd Negative Rebuttal (2NR=5 min) 2nd Affirmative Rebuttal (2AR=5 min) Each team receives 8 minutes of prep time that may be used according to their strategy. Citation of evidence Evidence must be contiguous. And, citations done correctly, i.e.: Frank, 2015 [Walter M. Frank (legal scholar, attorney), “Individual Rights and citation → the Political Process: A Proposed Framework for Democracy Defining Cases,” 3 Southern University Law Review 35:47, Fall, 2015, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Your Voice
    FINDING YOUR VOICE FINDING YOUR VOICE A Comprehensive Guide to Collegiate Policy Debate Allison Hahn Taylor Ward Hahn Marie-Odile N. Hobeika International Debate Education Association New York, London & Amsterdam Published by: International Debate Education Association 105 East 22nd Street New York, NY 10010 Copyright © 2013 by Allison Hahn, Taylor Ward Hahn, and Marie-Odile N. Hobeika This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hahn, Allison. Finding your voice : a comprehensive guide to collegiate policy debate / Allison Hahn, Taylor Ward Hahn, Marie-Odile N. Hobeika. pages cm ISBN 978-1-61770-051-4 1. Debates and debating. I. Hahn, Taylor Ward. II. Hobeika, Marie-Odile N. III. Title. PN4181.H24 2013 808.53--dc23 2012042433 Design by Kathleen Hayes Printed in the USA CONTENTS Preface ............................................... vii Chapter 1: Basics of Policy Debate ...................... 1 Chapter 2: The Policy Debate Squad .................... 11 Chapter 3: The Topic Process ........................... 16 Chapter 4: Arguments ................................. 22 Chapter 5: Evidence ................................... 35 Chapter 6: Responsibilities of the Affirmative and Negative .............................................. 59 Chapter 7: Speaking and Flowing ....................... 67 Chapter 8: Speeches ................................... 76 Chapter 9: Cross-Examination ......................... 97 Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • Lincoln-Douglas Debate
    T h e F r e e E n t e r p r i s e I n s t i t u t e Liberalism, Values & Lincoln-Douglas Debate Essays on Lincoln-Douglas debate from eight years of Econ Update & the LD/Extemp Monthly. 2nd Edition! More articles by: George H. Smith Dale E. Miller Paul Heyne Gregory F. Rehmke & many others . Converted to Adobe Acrobat and placed on www.freespeaker.org in February 2002 by Greg Rehmke, Director of Student Outreach, Foundation for Economic Education Email: [email protected] Published September, 1992 by the Knowledge Network Foundation. Second Edition published September, 1994 by the Free Enterprise Institute. Second Edition, Second Printing, October, 1995 The Second and Expanded Edition of Liberalism, Values & Lincoln-Douglas Debate is published by The Free Enterprise Institute (FEI), a not-for- profit educational foundation based in Houston, Texas. Other FEI publications include The American Idea, published quarterly, LD Solu- tions, published through the school year, and Economics in Argumentation resource books on each year's national high school debate topic. For more information about FEI programs for students and teachers write: Gregory F. Rehmke Director of Educational Programs Free Enterprise Institute 9525 Katy Freeway, Suite 303 Houston, Texas 77024 (713) 984-1343; Fax: 984-0409 Liberalism, Values & Lincoln-Douglas Debate Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................. i Two approaches to the question of justice .. 21 by Paul Heyne About the Authors................................................ iii Two Approaches to Ethics ................................ 23 Applying Logic to LD ............................................ 1 by Dale E. Miller by George H. Smith Applying these theories to LD ............................
    [Show full text]
  • Is a Genuinely Sustainable, Locally-Led, Politically-Smart
    Is a genuinely sustainable, locally-led, politically-smart approach to economic governance and Business Environment Reform possible? Lessons from 10 years implementing ENABLE in Nigeria Gareth Davies, November 2017 Lessons from 10 years of ENABLE in Nigeria 1 Contents Introduction 4 A. What does it mean to be sustainable, locally-led, and politically-smart? 6 B. How sustainable, locally-led, and politically-smart are mainstream approaches? 10 C. How was ENABLE different, in approach and in practice? 13 D. What did ENABLE achieve, and what difference did the approach make? 22 E. How do donors help (and hinder) implementation of a genuinely sustainable, locally-led, politically-smart approach? 31 Conclusions 34 References 35 The author would like to thank the entire ENABLE1 and ENABLE2 team, particularly Kevin Conroy (the ENABLE2 Team Leader), and the Senior Component Managers – Adenike Mantey, Abosede Paul-Obameso, Helen Bassey, and Habiba Jambo – without whose hard work and dedication the sucacess of ENABLE1 and 2, and therefore this paper, would not have been possibale. Special thanks also goes to David Elliott and Gavin Anderson, who take a good deal of credit for designing, shaping, and guiding the ENABLE programme over the years. Thanks also to everyone who commented on drafts of this paper, including David Elliott, Kevin Conroy, Kevin Seely, and Dan Hetherington. The views expressed in this paper are the author’s own and do not reflect the views of Adam Smith International or the UK Department for International Development. 2 Glossary
    [Show full text]
  • Badgerland Pref Book
    James Madison Memorial and Middleton High Schools proudly host Badgerland Debate Tournament November 13-14, 2015 Judge Philosophy Book Updated as of 9:35 pm, 11/12/2015 LINCOLN-DOUGLAS JUDGES .............................................................................................................................. 4 Bailey, Kevin ............................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Beaver, Zack ............................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Berger, Marcie ........................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Burdt, Lauren .......................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Dean, John .............................................................................................................................................................................. 12 Dempsey, Richard ............................................................................................................................................................... 13 Fischer, Jason .......................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Meeting of Great Minds
    ROSTRUM April 2008 Volume 82 Issue 8 The Meeting of Great Minds Nuclear Energy/Power national security, war, DEBATE Handbooks ‘‘the CDE best in the nation.’’ Ocean NG deforestation, desertifi- Ocean Thermal NG cation, HANDBOOKS • Texas-based Oil sand/Tar sand petroauthoritarianism speech newsletter Photovoltaics KRITIKS 2008-2009: finds CDE Photovol. Power stns. Anthropocentrism Handbooks and Plug-in hybrid vehicles Deep Ecology, Earth-talk Alternative Pyrolysis Ecofeminism Affirmative Cases Renewable NG Certificates Eco-Modernism Energy Book the biggest, Recycled Energy Systems Ecological Terror, Eco-Scam, most complete, and Renewable NG Stubs Environmental Externalization, Renewable natural gas Env. Scapegoating, best debate books Renewable Portfolio Stand. Nuclearism available. Residential solar systems Nuclear Numbing, Nuke- • The ROCKY Residential Wind Energy speak, Science, Scientific MOUNTAIN Resource Standards Realism, Techno-Strategic Seasonal thermal store SOLVENCY & EDUCATION Soft energy, Solar design Survey looked at ATTACKS ALTERNATIVE Solar guerilla Person power shortages CDE, Paradigm, Solar silicon, Solar Wafers Bureaucracy ENERGY 2008-09 DRG, Squirrel Switchgrass Infrastructure Tax break repeal; Vol. 1 Killers, West Enforcement Tax Credit Export Growth Coast, Michigan, Tax Incentives U.S. action not enuf Communican, and Tidal power INHERENCY Tight gas Harvard. CAFÉ Standards CDE W. Bennett Two-way Meters Clean NG Trends They rank CDE Waste mgt. Econ Security & Rec.Act best in every Waste-to-energy TESTIMONIALS Energy infrastructure Wave energy category except Energy Tax Act ‘‘Unique evidence and Wind Farms editing. EPA, Federal vehicle arguments unavailable Wood chips standards, Incandescent light elsewhere.’’ J. Prager, CASE SPECIFIC Wood fuel /pallets bulb out, Solar, Wind, California Wood gas BLOCKS on: Geothermal Power Incen- Zero-energy building/Low Alt.
    [Show full text]
  • Niles Debate Curriculum Guide
    Debate SO3D01 Curriculum Guide Niles Township High Schools, District 219 Ms. Katie Gjerpen Mr. Eric Oddo Table of Contents: Department Structure……………………………………3 Learning Targets…………………………………………4 Syllabus…………………………………………………..7 Pacing Guide…………………………………………….14 Instructional Materials…………………………………...26 Assessment Materials…………………………………...122 2 Department Structure: 3 Debate Learning Targets: Learning Target (1) - Common Core Skills A. I can read and interpret an historical document. B. I can recognize the difference between facts and opinions. C. I can write and defend a thesis. D. I can write a coherent paragraph using a claim, evidence, and a warrant. E. I can interpret maps, charts, graphs, and political cartoons. F. I can connect facts to construct meaning and make logical inferences. G. I can take notes to organize historical content. H. I can utilize the political spectrum to analyze historical events. Learning Target (2)-Advanced Research A. I can use electronic resources to find debate evidence. B. I can compile debate evidence into block format so it can be used during a round. C. I can identify quality sources and find qualifications of authors with ease. Learning Target (3)-The Affirmative A. I can explain the major components of the 1AC. B. I can construct a 1AC that places the Affirmative in strategic position over the Negative. C. I can extend case arguments in the 2AC, 1AR and 2AR effectively. D. I can describe why the impacts of the Affirmative outweigh the impacts of the Negative disadvantages, counter plan net benefits and kritik impacts. E. I can utilize Affirmative theory arguments to my advantage and to the Negative’s disadvantage during a debate round.
    [Show full text]
  • Hegemony Advantage
    Middle School Packet 10 Hegemony Advantage - SCS Impact Framing Extinction from nuclear war dwarfs all other impact calculus – reducing nuclear risk is morally required Jonathan Schell, 2000, Fate of the Earth, pp. 93-96, Jonathan Schell was an American author and was a fellow at the Institute of Politics at the John F. Kennedy School of Government and a fellow at the Kennedy School's Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics, and Public Policy. In 2003, he was a visiting lecturer at Yale Law School, and in 2005, a Distinguished Visiting Fellow at Yale's Center for the Study of Globalization, whose work primarily dealt with campaigning against nuclear weapons, https://books.google.com/books?id=tYKJsAEs1oQC&printsec=frontcover&dq=jonathan+schell+fate+of+the+earth&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEw j2p6fzmbXOAhXJCMAKHZsID_QQ6AEIHjAA#v=onepage&q=to%20say%20that%20human%20extinction&f=false To say that human extinction is a certainty would, of course, be a misrepresentation – just as it would be a misrepresentation to say that extinction can be ruled out. To begin with, we know that a holocaust may not occur at all. If one does occur, the adversaries may not use all their weapons. If they do use all their weapons, the global effects in the ozone and elsewhere, may be moderate. And if the effects are not moderate but extreme, the ecosphere may prove resilient enough to withstand them without breaking down catastrophically. These are all substantial reasons for supposing that mankind will not be extinguished in a nuclear holocaust, or even that extinction in a holocaust is unlikely, and they tend to calm our fear and to reduce our sense of urgency.
    [Show full text]
  • Debater Developmental Benchmarks
    Debater Developmental Benchmarks Growth of a CDL Debater: Key Benchmarks In order to measure the qualitative growth a CDL debater, the Chicago Debate League uses designated benchmarks for each year of a CDL debater's development. These benchmarks help CDL coaches and administrators design teaching strategies and methods, and help them assess the progress of individual debaters and of debate teams as a whole. Qualitative benchmarks also assist the CDL in balancing the crucial focus on the scope and breadth of programming - student participation metrics - with results-oriented and sustained commitment to programming that is qualitatively meaningful, has depth, is consistent with broader standards of rigor within the broader context of high school competitive academic debate, and perhaps most importantly, produces measurable learning outcomes aligned with broader academic goals. The numbers attached to each benchmark are for reference purposes and do not imply sequential ordering to their teaching or learning, though year two benchmarks build on year one benchmarks, and likewise year three/four benchmarks build on what should be learned by debaters in their the first two years. Year One Benchmarks Debate Round Mechanics (1) Speeches, cross-examination, prep time Debater understands when it is their turn to speak and for how long; understands when to ask/answer cross-examination questions; understands prep time (how much available, use) (2) Role of the judge, function of the ballot Debater understands the conduct, limitations, and jurisdiction
    [Show full text]