Ephemeroptera Galactica

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ephemeroptera Galactica Transactions of the American Entomological Society 127(1): 5-29, 2001 Mayflies (Ephemeroptera) of the Great Plains. I: Nebraska W. P. McCafferty Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907 Tom H. Klubertanz - Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin Rock County, Janesville, WI53546 R. P. Randolph Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907 Arwin V. Provonsha Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907 H. R. Lawson Division of Science and Mathematics, Chadron State College, Chadron, NE 69337 B. C. Kondratieff Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523 abstract A 39 are total of 13 families, genera, and 81 species of Ephemeroptera state reported from the of Nebraska, including the first published state records two are new for families, 13 genera, and 38 species. Also provided 335 county are now records for 65 of the species. Mayflies known from 60 of the 93 areas Nebraska counties and from all drainage represented in the state. Most are common species of the Nebraska fauna relatively in North America. Notable exceptions include Apobaetis lakota McCafferty, Brachycercus edmundsi B. nasutus Sold?n, Sold?n, Cercobrachys serpentis Sold?n, Leptophlebiagravastella and (Eaton), Paraleptophlebia gregalis (Eaton). Much of the mayfly fauna is are psammophilous, being typical of sand-bottomed streams, which predomi nate throughout much of the state. The generally mixed North American of are geographic affinities the Nebraska fauna tabulated, and several species significantly demonstrate their eastern, western, or northern range limits in this north-central plains state. 6 GREAT PLAINS MAYFLIES BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION Nebraska was one of several North American states indicated by McCafferty (2000a) as not having been studied to any significant extent with to its fauna. respect Ephemeroptera Study of the Nebraska mayflies was deemed because the central important of geographic position of the its state, relatively large size (77,227 square miles), and its extensive sand bottomed streams and rivers. the Nebraska fauna Thus, could yield data for important understanding transcontinental ranges of the North as a American fauna well providing better understanding of the poorly known psammophilous mayfly fauna (e.g., see McCafferty 1991). Ratcliffe (1990) provided an excellent physiographic review of this state from the perspective of insect habitat. Nebraska is primarily prairie with six different short and tall grassland types found throughout most of the state, although much of the prairie is now in cultivation. Pine ridges to the extent of elevation occur in the far western 5,340' portion of the state, and deciduous forest as low as 835' elevation may be found in the in Missouri Valley the extreme southeast. In the western two-thirds of the state are the Nebraska Sand Hills (19,300 square miles), the largest sand dune area in the Western Hemisphere. Streams range from low flow with moderate and mixed springs gradient substrates (e.g., Chadron Creek) to moderately large streams with predominately silt and sand bottoms Elkhorn to low (e.g., River) long, meandering, gradient streams, often ribboned due to considerable draw down for agricultural and seasonal low precipitation, that typically exhibit clean shifting sand substrates Niobrara to (e.g., River) the large Missouri River. Previous to this study, published reports of mayflies from Nebraska with associated record data included only 28 species (Traver 1935, Spieth 1941, Hamilton 1959, Swanson 1967, McCafferty 1975, Bednarik and McCafferty 1979, Kondratieff and Voshell 1984, Moul 1984, Pescador 1985, Provonsha and McCafferty 1985, McCafferty and Waltz 1986, Darrow and Pruess 1989, Provonsha 1990, Harris et al. 1999, Klubertanz and Jones 1999, McCafferty 2000b, Wiersema and McCafferty 2000). Five unpublished theses (Hamilton 1952, Pesek 1974, Carnevalo 1981, Decker 1981, Angle 1987) provided data associated with mayflies in Nebraska. Any reports of species in Nebraska contained in those studies are noted in the present study with respect to those that could be verified with additional records given herein or elsewhere or those that should have been identified with confidence at the time considering the state of taxonomic and available aids. knowledge diagnostic Voucher materials from the Carnevalo and Decker theses, if existent, were not made avail to us able upon request; however, AVP verified several of the species involved at the time of the studies. Several vouchers from the Hamilton that (1952) study had been initially deposited at the University of Utah now at were and reside PERC examined by WPM. Eleven of the 81 species herein remain based on or reported entirely unpublished theses abstracts thereof (Carnevalo and Lunt 1982, Decker and Lunt 1982). Our review of previous reports and study of large collections of Nebraska accumulated us Ephemeroptera variously by for the past W. P. MCCAFFERTY ET AL. 7 have occurrence of 13 39 nearly 25 years, indicated the families, genera, in the state. Reviewed and new data are and 81 mayfly species presented 1 is as a indication of the in the text, and Table provided summary geographic affinities of the Nebraska species. From Table 1, it can be seen or less com that several species find their western, eastern, northern, monly southern distribution limits in Nebraska, and that Nebraska is a area with to the eastern and western North clearly transitional respect American fauna. Of considerable interest is the fact that certain otherwise southwestern species have been found in the Pine Ridge area of far and western Nebraska, for example, Baetis magnus McCafferty and Waltz western Caenis bajaensis Allen and Murvosh. Some widespread species, as are also common Ne such Heptagenia elegantula (Eaton) throughout braska but remain unknown east of there. Several eastern and mid western western limits in eastern for species apparently find Nebraska, example, Tricorythodes allectus (Needham) and Stenonemafemoratum (Say), although some of these, such as the latter, occur somewhat farther west in Canada (McCafferty and Randolph 1998). Nebraska serves as a bridge between western eastern for certain such as and populations species Ephemerella inermis Eaton and Stenonema terminatum (Walsh). None of the 81 mayfly are to species endemic Nebraska. vast are common The majority of Nebraska mayflies species through out in America. In their ranges North particular, however, Nebraska has a relatively rich fauna of caenid mayflies (both Caeninae and Homoeoneuria Brachycercinae), long-clawed Baetidae, Pseudironidae, and - (Oligoneuriidae) all groupings commonly associated with sand sub strates. Generally poorly known and infrequently taken mayflies found in Nebraska include Apobaetis lakota McCafferty, Camelohaetidius waltzi B. nasutus B. McCafferty, Brachycercus edmundsi Sold?n, Sold?n, prudens (McDunnough), Caenis youngi Roemhild, Cercobrachys serpentis Sold?n, Homoeoneuria ammophila (Spieth), Leptophlebia gravastella (Eaton), and Paraleptophlebia gregalis (Eaton). The first two species have only recently been discovered, are small and difficult to collect, and thus it is premature to estimate or environmental status. their potential rarity Species of are Brachycercus and Cercobrachys poorly understood, and thus many are not to no collected specimens identified species, and valid estimation or concern can of rarity environmental be made for these species at this time. In addition, the sand-silt habitats that Brachycercinae are found in are often not sampled adequately. Recent collections of C. youngi by WPM and AVP outside Nebraska would indicate that this species ismuch more common than Homoeoneuria is more previously thought. probably common than reports would indicate because its psammophilous habitat not taxonomic status has been adequately sampled. The of L. gravastella must be validated before estimates of rarity are assigned to it. Also, future studies of western species of the genus Paraleptophlebia should reveal the true commonness of P. a that not gregalis, species notably had been as far east as previously reported Nebraska. Historical and new faunistic data are reported below with no further comment. Presentation is alphabetical by family, genus, and species. All 8 GREAT PLAINS MAYFLIES or not and whether or previous reports, whether published complete not, are Previous New state and records are given under reports. county in the first name of collectors are record given full. Only any given per in case If a (abbreviated the of present authors). species has previously for a additional records from that are not been reported county, county names in all letters for easier given here. County appear capital tracking. counties with stream are For reference, the location of along key systems on state in 1. Data are shown the Nebraska map given Fig. abbreviated as as to conserve The materials for which much possible printed space. new data are are in the Purdue Entomo record reported mostly deposited material logical Research Collection (West Lafayette, Indiana). However, associated with collectors names including Klubertanz (THK), Clopton, or Sorgenfrei are deposited in the private collection of THK (Janseville, new state are Wisconsin), except for material contributing records, which also deposited in PERC. Those with collectors name including Kondratieff (BCK), Harris, or Opler are deposited at the C. P.
Recommended publications
  • List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017
    Washington Natural Heritage Program List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017 The following list of animals known from Washington is complete for resident and transient vertebrates and several groups of invertebrates, including odonates, branchipods, tiger beetles, butterflies, gastropods, freshwater bivalves and bumble bees. Some species from other groups are included, especially where there are conservation concerns. Among these are the Palouse giant earthworm, a few moths and some of our mayflies and grasshoppers. Currently 857 vertebrate and 1,100 invertebrate taxa are included. Conservation status, in the form of range-wide, national and state ranks are assigned to each taxon. Information on species range and distribution, number of individuals, population trends and threats is collected into a ranking form, analyzed, and used to assign ranks. Ranks are updated periodically, as new information is collected. We welcome new information for any species on our list. Common Name Scientific Name Class Global Rank State Rank State Status Federal Status Northwestern Salamander Ambystoma gracile Amphibia G5 S5 Long-toed Salamander Ambystoma macrodactylum Amphibia G5 S5 Tiger Salamander Ambystoma tigrinum Amphibia G5 S3 Ensatina Ensatina eschscholtzii Amphibia G5 S5 Dunn's Salamander Plethodon dunni Amphibia G4 S3 C Larch Mountain Salamander Plethodon larselli Amphibia G3 S3 S Van Dyke's Salamander Plethodon vandykei Amphibia G3 S3 C Western Red-backed Salamander Plethodon vehiculum Amphibia G5 S5 Rough-skinned Newt Taricha granulosa
    [Show full text]
  • TB142: Mayflies of Maine: an Annotated Faunal List
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Technical Bulletins Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station 4-1-1991 TB142: Mayflies of aine:M An Annotated Faunal List Steven K. Burian K. Elizabeth Gibbs Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/aes_techbulletin Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Burian, S.K., and K.E. Gibbs. 1991. Mayflies of Maine: An annotated faunal list. Maine Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 142. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Technical Bulletins by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ISSN 0734-9556 Mayflies of Maine: An Annotated Faunal List Steven K. Burian and K. Elizabeth Gibbs Technical Bulletin 142 April 1991 MAINE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION Mayflies of Maine: An Annotated Faunal List Steven K. Burian Assistant Professor Department of Biology, Southern Connecticut State University New Haven, CT 06515 and K. Elizabeth Gibbs Associate Professor Department of Entomology University of Maine Orono, Maine 04469 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Financial support for this project was provided by the State of Maine Departments of Environmental Protection, and Inland Fisheries and Wildlife; a University of Maine New England, Atlantic Provinces, and Quebec Fellow­ ship to S. K. Burian; and the Maine Agricultural Experiment Station. Dr. William L. Peters and Jan Peters, Florida A & M University, pro­ vided support and advice throughout the project and we especially appreci­ ated the opportunity for S.K. Burian to work in their laboratory and stay in their home in Tallahassee, Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • SOP #: MDNR-WQMS-209 EFFECTIVE DATE: May 31, 2005
    MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AIR AND LAND PROTECTION DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PROGRAM Standard Operating Procedures SOP #: MDNR-WQMS-209 EFFECTIVE DATE: May 31, 2005 SOP TITLE: Taxonomic Levels for Macroinvertebrate Identifications WRITTEN BY: Randy Sarver, WQMS, ESP APPROVED BY: Earl Pabst, Director, ESP SUMMARY OF REVISIONS: Changes to reflect new taxa and current taxonomy APPLICABILITY: Applies to Water Quality Monitoring Section personnel who perform community level surveys of aquatic macroinvertebrates in wadeable streams of Missouri . DISTRIBUTION: MoDNR Intranet ESP SOP Coordinator RECERTIFICATION RECORD: Date Reviewed Initials Page 1 of 30 MDNR-WQMS-209 Effective Date: 05/31/05 Page 2 of 30 1.0 GENERAL OVERVIEW 1.1 This Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) is designed to be used as a reference by biologists who analyze aquatic macroinvertebrate samples from Missouri. Its purpose is to establish consistent levels of taxonomic resolution among agency, academic and other biologists. The information in this SOP has been established by researching current taxonomic literature. It should assist an experienced aquatic biologist to identify organisms from aquatic surveys to a consistent and reliable level. The criteria used to set the level of taxonomy beyond the genus level are the systematic treatment of the genus by a professional taxonomist and the availability of a published key. 1.2 The consistency in macroinvertebrate identification allowed by this document is important regardless of whether one person is conducting an aquatic survey over a period of time or multiple investigators wish to compare results. It is especially important to provide guidance on the level of taxonomic identification when calculating metrics that depend upon the number of taxa.
    [Show full text]
  • Ephemeroptera: Caenidae) in Honey Creek, Oklahoma
    LIFE HISTORY AND SECONDARY PRODUCTION OF Caenis latipennis BANKS (EPHEMEROPTERA: CAENIDAE) IN HONEY CREEK, OKLAHOMA Jason M. T aylor, B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS August 2001 APPROVED: James H. Kennedy, Major Professor William T. Waller, Committee Member Earl G. Zimmerman, Chair of the Department of Biological Sciences, Committee Member Warren W. Burggren, Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences C. Neal Tate, Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies Taylor, Jason M., Life History and Secondary Production of Caenis latipennis Banks (Ephemeroptera: Caenidae) in Honey Creek, Oklahoma. Masters of Science (Biology), August 2001, 89 pp., 8 tables, 22 figures, references, 71 titles. A study of the life history and secondary production of Caenis latipennis, a caenid mayfly, was conducted on Honey Creek, OK. from August 1999 through September 2000. The first instar nymph was described. Nymphs were separated into five development classes. Laboratory egg and nymph development rates, emergence, fecundity, voltinism, and secondary production were analyzed. C. latipennis eggs and nymphs take 132 and 1709 degree days to develop. C. latipennis had an extended emergence with five peaks. Females emerged, molted, mated, and oviposited in an estimated 37 minutes. Mean fecundity was 888.4 ± 291.9 eggs per individual (range 239 –1576). C. latipennis exhibited a multivoltine life cycle with four overlapping generations. Secondary production was 6,052.57 mg/m2/yr. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Dr. J. H. Kennedy for his whole-hearted interest and support in this project and my career. His enthusiasm as a teacher and field biologist has taught me much more than just biology.
    [Show full text]
  • (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) of Iraq
    Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e63830 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.9.e63830 Research Article Updated check-list of the mayflies (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) of Iraq Farhad A. Khudhur‡§, Pavel Sroka ‡ University of Sulaimani, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan Region, Iraq § Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Entomology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic Corresponding author: Farhad A. Khudhur ([email protected]) Academic editor: Ben Price Received: 01 Feb 2021 | Accepted: 16 Mar 2021 | Published: 25 Mar 2021 Citation: Khudhur FA, Sroka P (2021) Updated check-list of the mayflies (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) of Iraq. Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e63830. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e63830 Abstract Based on a recent field survey in Iraqi Kurdistan and a critical evaluation of previously published data, 37 mayfly species are listed as occurring in Iraq. We collected and identified nine species as new for the country and corrected some previously published records. For several species scarcely treated in the literature, we provide information allowing their identification in the larval stage to promote the acquisition of reliable faunistic data from Iraq in the future. Keywords aquatic biodiversity, mayflies, Ephemeroptera, Middle East, Iraq Introduction Faunistic studies of mayflies occurring in some parts of the Middle East are still sparse. Existing studies have mainly focused on the Arabian Peninsula (Thomas and Sartori 1989, Sartori and Gillies 1990, Sartori 1991Gattolliat and Sartori 2008), Levant (Demoulin 1973, Koch 1980, Koch 1981, Koch 1988, Thomas et al. 2007, Thomas et al. 1988, Thomas and Dia 1983, Thomas and Dia 1984, Thomas and Dia 1985, Thomas and Dia 1999, Thomas © Khudhur F, Sroka P.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Biological Resources Technical Report
    Northern Integrated Supply Project Environmental Impact Statement Aquatic Biological Resources Technical Report Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District March 2008 Prepared by: GEI Consultants, Inc. Chadwick Ecological Division 5575 South Sycamore Street, Suite 101 Littleton, CO 80120 CONTENTS 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................1 1.1. Northern Integrated Supply Project ...................................................................1 1.2. No Action Alternative ........................................................................................1 1.3. Group 1—Southern Group .................................................................................2 1.3.1. Erie .........................................................................................................3 1.3.2. Lafayette ................................................................................................3 1.3.3. Lefthand Water District .........................................................................3 1.3.4. No Action Alternative for Southern Group ...........................................3 1.4. Group 2—Northern Group .................................................................................3 1.4.1. Eaton ......................................................................................................4 1.4.2. Severance ...............................................................................................4 1.4.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Wisconsin's Strategy for Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need
    Prepared by Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources with Assistance from Conservation Partners Natural Resources Board Approved August 2005 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Acceptance September 2005 Wisconsin’s Strategy for Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need Governor Jim Doyle Natural Resources Board Gerald M. O’Brien, Chair Howard D. Poulson, Vice-Chair Jonathan P Ela, Secretary Herbert F. Behnke Christine L. Thomas John W. Welter Stephen D. Willet Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Scott Hassett, Secretary Laurie Osterndorf, Division Administrator, Land Paul DeLong, Division Administrator, Forestry Todd Ambs, Division Administrator, Water Amy Smith, Division Administrator, Enforcement and Science Recommended Citation: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. 2005. Wisconsin's Strategy for Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need. Madison, WI. “When one tugs at a single thing in nature, he finds it attached to the rest of the world.” – John Muir The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources provides equal opportunity in its employment, programs, services, and functions under an Affirmative Action Plan. If you have any questions, please write to Equal Opportunity Office, Department of Interior, Washington D.C. 20240. This publication can be made available in alternative formats (large print, Braille, audio-tape, etc.) upon request. Please contact the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Bureau of Endangered Resources, PO Box 7921, Madison, WI 53707 or call (608) 266-7012 for copies of this report. Pub-ER-641 2005
    [Show full text]
  • Benthic Invertebrate Species Richness & Diversity At
    BBEENNTTHHIICC INVVEERTTEEBBRRAATTEE SPPEECCIIEESSRRIICCHHNNEESSSS && DDIIVVEERRSSIITTYYAATT DIIFFFFEERRENNTTHHAABBIITTAATTSS IINN TTHHEEGGRREEAATEERR CCHHAARRLLOOTTTTEE HAARRBBOORRSSYYSSTTEEMM Charlotte Harbor National Estuary Program 1926 Victoria Avenue Fort Myers, Florida 33901 March 2007 Mote Marine Laboratory Technical Report No. 1169 The Charlotte Harbor National Estuary Program is a partnership of citizens, elected officials, resource managers and commercial and recreational resource users working to improve the water quality and ecological integrity of the greater Charlotte Harbor watershed. A cooperative decision-making process is used within the program to address diverse resource management concerns in the 4,400 square mile study area. Many of these partners also financially support the Program, which, in turn, affords the Program opportunities to fund projects such as this. The entities that have financially supported the program include the following: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Southwest Florida Water Management District South Florida Water Management District Florida Department of Environmental Protection Florida Coastal Zone Management Program Peace River/Manasota Regional Water Supply Authority Polk, Sarasota, Manatee, Lee, Charlotte, DeSoto and Hardee Counties Cities of Sanibel, Cape Coral, Fort Myers, Punta Gorda, North Port, Venice and Fort Myers Beach and the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This document was prepared with support from the Charlotte Harbor National Estuary Program with supplemental support from Mote Marine Laboratory. The project was conducted through the Benthic Ecology Program of Mote's Center for Coastal Ecology. Mote staff project participants included: Principal Investigator James K. Culter; Field Biologists and Invertebrate Taxonomists, Jay R. Leverone, Debi Ingrao, Anamari Boyes, Bernadette Hohmann and Lucas Jennings; Data Management, Jay Sprinkel and Janet Gannon; Sediment Analysis, Jon Perry and Ari Nissanka.
    [Show full text]
  • Other Arthropod Species
    Queen’s University Biological Station Species List: Other Arthropods The current list has been compiled by Dr. Ivy Schoepf, QUBS Research Coordinator, in 2018 and includes data gathered by direct observation, collected by researchers at the station and/or assembled using digital distribution maps. The list has been put together using resources from The Natural Heritage Information Centre (April 2018); The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (February 2018); iNaturalist and GBIF. Contact Ivy to report any errors, omissions and/or new sightings. Because arthropods comprise an Figure 1. Northern walkingsticks (Diapheromera incredibly diverse phylum, which includes femorata) can be quite large and measure up to 95 thousands of species, to help the reader navigate mm, with females typically being larger than males. their staggering diversity, I have broken down The one pictured here from QUBS is a rather small the entire phylum into several order- and class- individual, only measuring 50 mm. Photo courtesy of based sub-lists. The current list is, therefore, not Dr. Ivy Schoepf comprehensive and focuses only on a subset of arthropods. For information regarding arachnids; beetles; crickets & grasshoppers; crustaceans; dragonflies; flies; hymenopterans; and moths & butterflies, please consult their very own lists published on our website. Based on the aforementioned criteria we can expect to find 84 additional arthropod species (phylum: Arthropoda) present at QUBS. These include 68 insects (class: Insecta); eight millipedes (class: Diplopoda); five springtails (class: Entognatha); two centipedes (class: Chilopoda); and one hexanauplian (class: Hexanauplia). Five species are considered as introduced (i). Species are reported using their full taxonomy; common name and status, based on whether the species is of global or provincial concern (see Table 1 for details).
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution of Insects, Spiders, and Mites in the Air
    TECHNICAL BULLETIN NO. 673 MAY 1939 THE DISTRIBUTION OF INSECTS, SPIDERS, AND MITES IN THE AIR BY P. A. CLICK Assistant Entomolo^ist Division of Cotton Insect In^^estigations Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTUREJWAVSHINGTON, D. C. somi )r sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. Price 25 ccntt Technical Bulletin No. 673 May 1939 UNJIED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AQRIQULTURE WASHINGTON, D. C n THE DISTRIBUTION OF INSECTS, SPIDERS, AND MITES IN THE AIR ' By P. A. GLICK Assistant entomologist, Division of CMçtn Insect Investigations, Bureau of Ento- mology hndWlant Quarantine 2 CONTENTS Page Pasrt Introduction 1 Meteorological data—Continued Scope of the work '_l_^ Absolute humidity 101 The collecting ground ""' '" g Vapor pressure 102 Airplane insect traps ...... 6 Barometric pressure. _. .1 104 Operation and efläciency of the traps ' 8 Air currents---._._ "" log Seasonal distribution of insects 9 Light intensity "" 122 Altitudinal distribution of insects 12 Cloud conditions _ 126 Day collecting 12 Precipitation . _" 128 Night collecting 16 Electrical state of the atmosphere 129 Notes on the insects collected * 16 Effects of the Mississippi River flood of 1927 \Yinged forms _ 59 on the insect population of the air ISO Size, weight, and buoyancy _ 84 Seeds collected in the upper air __.. 132 Wingless insects 87 Collection of insects in Mexico 133 Immature stages _ 90 Sources of insects and routes of migration 140 Insects taken alive 91 Aircraft as insect carriers.-.-.. 141 Meteorological data _ 93 Collecting insects in the upper air 142 Temperature _.. 93 Summary 143 Dew point _ 98 Literature cited...
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Lower Belt Creek – Coal Acid Mine Drainage Sampling Report
    2015 Lower Belt Creek – Coal Acid Mine Drainage Sampling Report Final Report for Montana Department of Environmental Quality Prepared by Jason Mullen, Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks Trevor Selch, Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks Lindsey Gilstrap, Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks Dylan Owensby, Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks February 2018 Introduction Acid mine drainage (AMD) from past coal mining activities currently results in exceedances of Montana Water Quality Standards for iron and aluminum in Belt Creek, in the town of Belt, Montana. Numerous other metals exceed the water quality standards in the AMD water itself. Montana Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) is proposing to construct a water treatment plant in the area of Coke Oven Flats to treat several sources of AMD water prior to it reaching Belt Creek and thereby improve water quality in Belt Creek. Currently, water quality monitoring is being conducted by MDEQ; however, no aquatic life (fish and benthic invertebrate) monitoring had been conducted in Belt Creek in this area. Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks (MFWP) sought to begin fish and benthic invertebrate monitoring to document the level of impact prior to construction of the treatment plant. With continued monitoring following the construction of the treatment plant, MFWP will provide documentation of the response in the aquatic life, which is one of the designated beneficial uses of Belt Creek. Methods and Study Area Fish Sampling We sampled fish populations in the sections immediately upstream (control) and downstream (impact) from the AMD site (considered the Anaconda discharge for this report) in Belt Creek on November 2, 2015 (Figure 1 and Table 1).
    [Show full text]