DOCSLIB.ORG

Establishment of a Design Review Panel for the City of Swan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Establishment of a Design Review Panel for the City of Swan Ordinary Meeting of Council 10 April 2019 3.1 ESTABLISHMENT OF A DESIGN REVIEW PANEL FOR THE CITY OF SWAN Ward: (All Wards) (Strategic Planning) Disclosure of Interest: Nil Authorised Officer: (Executive Manager Planning & Development) KEY ISSUES • The Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage released stage one of Design WA which included the following documents: - State Planning Policy 7.0 Design of the Built Environment - State Planning Policy 7.3 Residential Design Codes Volume One Apartments - Design Review Guide • State Planning Policy 7.3 Residential Design Codes Volume One Apartments replaces Part 6 of the current R-Codes in regards to the assessment of Multiple Dwellings. • The Design Review Guide provides non-statutory guidance to local governments on how to establish, run and maintain a Design Review Panel. • Although only strongly recommended, already 22 out of 29 metro councils have implemented or are in the process of setting up a Design Review Panel. It is recommended that the Council establish a Design Review Panel with a partial fee cost recovery system. BACKGROUND The Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage released stage one of Design WA on the 18 February 2019. The documents included: • State Planning Policy 7.0 Design of the Built Environment • State Planning Policy 7.3 Residential Design Codes Volume One Apartments • Design Review Guide The purpose of this report is to provide Council with further information about the Design Review Guide relating to the establishment and terms of reference of a Design Review Panel (DRP). Page 1 Ordinary Meeting of Council 10 April 2019 DETAILS The Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage in conjunction with the Office of the Government Architect produced the Design Review Guide to provide local governments with a guide on how to establish and run a DRP. This guide does not have statutory weight and is only recommending the establishment of a DRP to local governments. In saying this, it is strongly recommended and already 22 out of 29 metro councils have implemented or are in the process of setting up a Design Review Panel. The purpose of Design Review Panel is to independently evaluate the design quality of a built environment proposal. The proposal is reviewed by a panel of multi-disciplinary built environment professionals who are experienced in offering objective and constructive design advice. The advice is guided by performance based design principles as set out in State Planning Policy 7.0 "Design of the Built Environment". A performance approach to evaluation provides the flexibility needed for the assessment of complex, multi-faceted projects. State Planning Policy 7.0 identifies the following 10 principles with the purpose to establish a definition of ‘good design’ that can inform the design, review and decision making process for built environment proposals: 1. Context and character 2. Landscape quality 3. Built form and scale 4. Functionality and build quality 5. Sustainability 6. Amenity 7. Legibility 8. Safety 9. Community 10. Aesthetics Proposals should include a design statement, providing an affirmation of how the proposal addresses these Design Principles. Purpose/Role of a Design Review Panel A DRP is formed to provide independent expert advice to the respective local government and applicants on the design and site planning of specified development proposals preferably prior to the submission of a development application. A DRP seeks to facilitate an improvement in urban design and the quality of the built environment within the local government area. This is done through the provision of information, expert advice and recommendations via professional and technical advice, in an adversarial and informal manner. Accordingly DRP's perform an advisory function only and do not make decisions on, or approve applications. Matters to be referred to the Design Review Panel The types of proposals and the scale of design review should be determined by the local government and may be included in the terms of reference and/or an appropriate local planning policy. The Design Review Guide has outlined a threshold table, which can be used as guidance to determine the mode of design review best suited to a particular development. Page 2 Ordinary Meeting of Council 10 April 2019 Meeting Details DRP meetings are usually held once per month during office hours but as required to deal with matters that have been referred for advice. Each item is allocated 45 mins for the City to present the item, the applicant to present the item and then for the panel to discuss. The Design Review Guide recommends that the DRP view each proposal three times. Once at the concept stage, once at the design stage and once at the building permit stage to check the final plans before it is built. It is important that the DRP see the proposal pre-lodgement because it is easier for the developer and architect to make changes at the concept stage rather than once the development application is lodged. Also, this program is outside of the statutory process so it does not affect the limited time frames. It will be local government’s responsibility to coordinate the Design Review Panel meeting. The Guide recommends the following roles need to be organised by the City to run the meeting. Page 3 Ordinary Meeting of Council 10 April 2019 Panel Coordinator A senior planning staff member is usually the panel coordinator. Their responsibility is to prepare the agenda, circulate the plans as well as the feedback, organise any additional information for the panel meetings, organise the fees and payments for the DRP. Senior Planning Staff Senior planning staff (such as manager or director of planning services) should provide the necessary administrative support and advice to the meeting including managing the meeting opening and closing proceedings and providing governance advice where requested by the panel Chair. The Chair should manage and facilitate the interactive design review discussion and identify the key recommendations for reporting. (Note that the senior planning officer can also fulfil the role of chairperson). Presenting Planning Officer For each proposal under consideration, a planning officer should present an overview of the site (or proposal) including history, current and future surrounding context as well as compliance with planning controls and relevant design criteria. They will also convey any concerns raised through internal referral pathways (e.g. heritage, stormwater, traffic/parking) if available. Report writer Local government is responsible for ensuring that notes or minutes are taken for all panel meetings. The report writer should liaise with the panel coordinator in the preparation and finalisation of the meeting notes and the design review report. Membership of a Design Review Panel It is recommended by the Design Review Guide for the panel members to have a range of design and built environment expertise. While local knowledge is useful for context, the members should not be made up of any decision makers or elected members. It is recommended at least 4 panel members attend a meeting to provide a variety of industry experience and knowledge. The local government may engage with a pool of members which can be called on for different applications. The following disciplines are recommended: • Architecture (essential) • Landscape architecture (essential) • Urban design (Essential) • Heritage • Sustainability and environmental design • Engineering • Accessibility • Transport planning • Planning • Public Art Page 4 Ordinary Meeting of Council 10 April 2019 It is recommended that the DRP membership contain between four and six members, including a chair person. The local government may engage with a pool of members who can then be called on for different applications. The appointment of all members is ratified by Council as is the selection of the chairperson. The term of office for DRP members is generally two years, although any member may be reappointed. Appointment of Panel Members Member appointment processes should demonstrate rigour to ensure a high degree of confidence in the Panel. The Office of the Government Architect can provide recommendations of experienced panel members to form part of the City’s DRP or that can be called for once off meetings. Alternatively the local government can undergo an independent appointment process. By undertaking an independent process, there is greater scope for Council to appoint local architects who have an intimate and knowledgeable appreciation of the City and its unique characteristics. In the event this process is chosen, it is recommended that: • Provide for the establishment of a DRP in a new Local Planning Policy. • A Terms of Reference for the DRP is prepared and endorsed • A formal EOI process is undertaken; • An appropriately skilled selection panel is formed; • After a shortlisting exercise, an interview process should be undertaken that confirms design review expertise; • Members are appointed for an agreed term; • All terms of the appointment are confirmed, including remuneration details for each member; and • A formal member induction is held. Panel Member Remuneration Remuneration should reflect the professional standing of panel members and their time taken to prepare for and participate in meetings. The local government should determine the remuneration for panel members at the time of appointment. The Office of the Government Architect recommends the following guide: 1. Pay by the hour The local government
Load more

Recommended publications
  • City of Joondalup Local Emergency Management Arrangements
    City of Joondalup Local Emergency Management Arrangements Including the Local Recovery Handbook and Local Recovery Plan Version 1 PUBLIC VERSION joondalup.wa.gov.au 1 City of Joondalup Local Emergency Management Arrangements Local Emergency Management Arrangements These arrangements have been produced and issued under the authority of S. 41(1) of the Emergency Management Act 2005, endorsed by the Wanneroo - Joondalup Local Emergency Management Committee and the Council of the City of Joondalup. The Arrangements have been tabled for noting with the North Metropolitan District Emergency Management Committee and State Emergency Management Committee. The City of Joondalup Local Emergency Management Arrangements has been structured in three (3) distinct parts (including annexures); • The Local Emergency Management Arrangements (the whole document), • The Local Recovery Handbook, and • The City of Joondalup Local Recovery Plan. The purpose is to provide the overarching legislative requirements (the Local Emergency Management Arrangements), the legislative context for recovery (the Local Recovery Handbook) and an operational guide for the recovery phase of an emergency (the Local Recovery Plan). ____________________________________________________________________ __________________________________ Chair Date Wanneroo – Joondalup Local Emergency Management Committee ____________________________________________________________________ __________________________________ Endorsed by City of Joondalup Date City of Joondalup Local Emergency Management
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Amendment No.188 to City of Swan Local Planning Scheme
    Ordinary Meeting of Council 06 May 2020 3.1 PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO.188 TO CITY OF SWAN LOCAL PLANNING SCHEME NO.17 - TO REMOVE VARIOUS LAND IN SOUTH GUILDFORD, ASCOT AND REDCLIFFE FROM THE SCHEME IN RESPONSE TO CITY OF BELMONT LOCAL PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT NO.11 Ward: (No Wards) (Statutory Planning) Disclosure of Interest: Nil Authorised Officer: (Executive Manager Planning and Development) KEY ISSUES • In December 2017 'Local Government (Belmont and Swan - Change of Boundaries) Order 2017' came into effect, which transferred approximately 12ha of land in South Guildford, Ascot and Redcliffe from the City of Swan to the City of Belmont. • The City of Belmont is seeking comment on their advertised Amendment No.11 to its Local Planning Scheme No.15 which, amongst other matters, seeks to: o Update their scheme's boundaries to include all land that was transferred from City of Swan to City of Belmont as part of the above 2017 Order. o Provide City of Belmont's local zones to this land, where required. This will result in Lot 2 Apac Way, South Guildford and Lot 3 Great Eastern Highway, Redcliffe being entirely zoned 'Industrial' and Lot 301 Great Eastern Highway, Ascot being entirely zoned 'Mixed Use'. • Staff have no objection to the City of Belmont's proposal as this land is no longer within the City of Swan and the proposed zones are considered logical. • With City of Belmont updating its scheme, it is timely for the City of Swan to take steps to update its Scheme to omit this same land. This is the purpose of proposed Amendment No.188 to City of Swan Local Planning Scheme No.17 (LPS17).
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Recovery Plan 2016 (Public Version)
    CITY OF STIRLING EMERGENCY RECOVERY PLAN 2016 (PUBLIC VERSION) 2016 RECOVERY PLAN( Public Version ) Page 1 CITY OF STIRLING EMERGENCY RECOVERY PLAN 2016 (PUBLIC VERSION) This page left blank intentionally 2016 RECOVERY PLAN( Public Version ) Page 2 CITY OF STIRLING EMERGENCY RECOVERY PLAN 2016 (PUBLIC VERSION) Disclaimer The City of Stirling, Emergency Management Australia and the Australian Government make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in this document or any material related to this document for any purpose. The document is provided ‘as is’ without warranty of any kind to the extent permitted by law. The City of Stirling, The Attorney Generals Department (Emergency Management), W.A. State Emergency Management Committee Secretariat, WALGA EM, the Australian Government and the State of Western Australia hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall the City of Stirling, The Attorney General’s Department (Emergency Management), W.A. State Emergency Management Committee Secretariat, the W.A. Local Government Association, the Australian Government and the State of Western Australia be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from the loss of use, data, or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortuous action, arising out of or in connection with the use of information available in this document. This document or material related to this document or referred to by this document could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Acknowledgements The City of Stirling acknowledges the use of material provided by Emergency Management Australia (EMA) and SEMC.
    [Show full text]
  • Cockburn Soundings February 2021
    COCKBURN FEBRUARY 2021 YOUR CITY OF COCKBURN MAGAZINE #Feelgood @More on page 4 Document Set ID: 10189239 Version: 2, Version Date: 04/02/2021 Coogee Live Contents Features 4 Coogee Live 2021 Get the latest information on what’s happening 6 Have your say on verge collections We’re reviewing how we do verge collections 7 Food waste trial Turning food waste into electricity 10 Getting healthy in 2021 We’re making it easy by Message from the Mayor offering a range of programs The New Year is one where Armadale Road, the new bridge over we can look to the amazing the freeway, upgrades to Solomon, opportunities that lay before us Jandakot and Hammond Roads, albeit constrained by the need dual use pathway extensions to to be mindful of the COVID-19 improve connectivity for cyclists pandemic and the implications and pedestrians, the planting of it has for all of us. Children are more verge trees and revegetation returning to school and the holiday projects to increase the tree canopy period for many is coming to an and to provide a haven for birds, end. Please take care in school insects, lizards etc and of course zones and remember 40km/h the City’s well respected and valued speed zones apply. School grants and donations program crossing guards are in place so that benefits so many individuals, let’s give them a wave of thanks organisations and now, the small and appreciation as we pass. business sector. Many of us will have made New Year On behalf of the elected members resolutions following the festive and staff I trust that 2021 brings to season – the challenge is to achieve everyone the opportunity to enhance them which can be somewhat their personal and family wellbeing.
    [Show full text]
  • WABN Grants Program: Awarded Projects 2020-21
    * Some totals includes 2021-22 committed funding. Project locations are diagrammatic only. Regional Projects SEE TABLE BELOW FOR DETAILS $200,000 $514,820* $10,000 West Swan Rd Shared Path 3 Projects City of Swan Kimberley Region Whitfords Ave Shared Path Design City of Joondalup Indian Ocean $15,000 Hudson Ave / Girrawheen Ave / Wade Ct Shared Path Design City of Wanneroo $481,158* $20,000 2 Projects Quintilian Rd Shared Path Design Pilbara Region City of Nedlands $10,000 $110,000 $175,000 School Sport Circuit Feasibility High Wycombe Selby Street Shared Path City of Nedlands Connection to and Signals Improvement Forrestfield WESTERN Town of Cambridge Train Station AUSTRALIA $90,750 City of Kalamunda Eucla St to Glendalough Train Station Shared Path $150,000 City of Vincent Brockway Rd Shared Path $238,998* City of Nedlands 4 Projects $317,500* Berkshire Rd / Dundas Rd Mid West Region $335,000 Shared Path $47,500 Cannington to City of Kalamunda $937,437* Jeff Joseph Reserve Willetton Shared Path $18,000 Shared Path Design and Footbridge 14 Projects City of Canning Hale Rd to Dawson Ave Wheatbelt Region City of Melville Cycling Route Design City of Kalamunda SEE METRO MAP $242,500 1 Project Goldfields Esperance Region $67,500 $732,500* $210,000 Murdoch Dr Railway Pde Shared Path 2 Projects Shared Path Design William St to Ladywell St $1,181,885* Great Southern Region City of Melville City of Gosnells 10 Projects $45,000 South West Region The Crescent Shared Path Design [email protected] 16 March 2018; Plan No:9019202
    [Show full text]
  • Western Australia: a Small Area Perspective
    ......................................................................F E A T U R E A R T I C L E – Western Australia: A Small Area Perspective INTRODUCTION Western Australia occupies the western third of the Australian continent, comprising a land area of about 2,529,880 square kilometres. The administration of the urban and regional areas of this large and diverse State is divided amongst 142 local government authorities; nine development commissions; and a number of State and Commonwealth government departments and organisations. The demand for information relating to small geographic areas (such as Local Government Areas — LGAs) and broader regions (such as development commission regions) continues to increase. The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) is committed to identifying and disseminating social, economic and environmental data for small areas to assist governments and communities seeking to enhance local and regional well–being in an environmentally sustainable way. The results of this on–going data gathering from ABS and non–ABS information sources are compiled and available in the ABS' Western Australian Regional Profiles, more details of which are provided on page 26, and through the Integrated Regional Data Base, details of which are available on the ABS website at www.abs.gov.au (select Products & Services/Key Products). This article presents selected social and economic data for LGAs from the 2002 Regional Profiles to provide a mosaic of social and economic life in urban and regional Western Australia. A significant proportion of the social data has been drawn from the 2001 Census of Population and Housing. The Census is the most comprehensive source of information about the characteristics of people in Australia and the dwellings in which they live.
    [Show full text]
  • WESTERN AUSTRALIA Kings Park, Perth Kings Park
    WESTERN AUSTRALIA Kings Park, Perth Kings Park, WHERE SHOULD ALL THE TREES GO? STATE BY STATE WA WHAT’S HAPPENING? Average canopy cover 51% of urban WA is urban LGAs in WA have seen a 19.95% decrease in shrubs. down 2.32% from 22.27% in 2011. The City of Cockburn is of concern given that there has been a 16.6% loss in shrubbery and an almost equivalent gain in grass surfaces, suggesting that clearing may have taken place. 41% of 24% of urban LGAs in WA LGAs in WA have have experienced a seen an increase The 5% loss of canopy in the City of Cockburn is significant loss in hard surfaces. almost equivalent to that of the hard surface increase. in canopy. WHERE SHOULD ALL THE TREES GO? WESTERN AUSTRALIA WA THE MOST & LEAST VULNERABLE 2.5 Rating City of Armadale, City of Fremantle, City of Gosnells, City of Perth, City of Rockingham 3.0 Rating City of Bayswater, Town of Cambridge, Town of East Fremantle, 2.0 Rating City of Melville, City of Stirling Town of Bassendean, City of Swan, City of Wanneroo 3.5 Rating City of Joondalup, Town of Mosman Park, City of Nedlands, 1.5 Rating City of South Perth, City of Subiaco, City of Vincent City of Cockburn, Town of Victoria Park 4.0 Rating City of Canning, Town of Cottesloe, Shire of Kalamunda, 1.0 Rating Shire of Mundaring, The Shire of Peppermint Grove City of Kwinana 4.5 Rating 0.5 Rating Town of Claremont City of Belmont LEAST MOST VULNERABLE VULNERABLE TOP URBAN GREENING OPPORTUNITIES: - City of Belmont (0.5) - Town of Bassendean, City of Swan, City of Wanneroo (2) - City of Kwinana (1) - City
    [Show full text]
  • Local Commercial and Activity Centres Strategy
    City of Swan Local Commercial and Activity Centres Strategy Best Practice Review of Key Issues Prepared for City of Swan by Essential Economics Pty Ltd Adopted by Council on 27th Sept emb er 2 017 Authorship Report stage Author Date Review Date Nick Brisbane 30 March 2016 Sean Stephens and Draft report 30 March 2016 John Henshall 6 April 2016 Alex Wilkinson City of Swan 12 May 2016 Draft report V2 Nick Brisbane 2 July 2016 Sean Stephens 3 August 2016 Final report Nick Brisbane 27 October 2017 Disclaimer Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the material and the integrity of the analysis presented in this report. However, Essential Economics Pty Ltd accepts no liability for any actions taken on the basis of the contents of this report. The information in this report has been prepared specifically for the stated client. This document should not be used or replicated in any way by any other party without first receiving written consent from Essential Economics Pty Ltd. Contact details For further details please contact Essential Economics Pty Ltd at one of our offices: 96 Pelham Street Level 26 / 44 Market Street Carlton Sydney Victoria 3053 New South Wales 2000 Australia Australia PH +61 3 9347 5255 PH +61 2 9089 8654 FAX +61 3 9347 5355 EMAIL [email protected] WEB www.essentialeconomics.com ABN 92 079 850 427 Our Reference: 15209 Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 Overview of Key Issues for the City of Swan ......................................................................... 2 Issue 1 Out-of-Date Activity Centre Policy and Response to SPP 4.2 ................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1.2 Proposed Policy - Sister City Relationships
    Ordinary Meeting of Council 1 March 2006 1.2 PROPOSED POLICY - SISTER CITY RELATIONSHIPS (All Wards) (Internal Audit) KEY ISSUES • The City's past approach to sister city relationships has been an informal one. Until recently, only one such relationship existed with Bivongi, Italy and limited to art and culture exhibitions through AM International • Requests for the City to enter into sister city relationships is increasing and a formal policy statement and assessment criteria is required in order to effectively assess these requests It is recommended to adopt the attached policy titled 'Sister City Relationships'; place $10,000 on the City's draft 2006/07 budget for consideration and assess the current sister city request from Inami, Japan against the new policy and assessment criteria in a future report to Council. BACKGROUND At the Leadership & Governance Councillor Portfolio meeting held in September 2005, the matter of providing an adequate budget for the City's current sister city relationships was discussed, together with a request to investigate the relevance of a policy statement and selection criteria for new sister city relationship requests. REPORT At the request of the Leadership & Governance Councillor Portfolio Committee, comparisons were made with other local governments regarding sister city relationship policies and assessment criteria. The Cities of Joondalup, Belmont and Perth were contacted and all have varying degrees and types of commitment to sister city relationships. City of Joondalup The City of Joondalup has one sister city relationship with Jinan, China. Friendly relations between the two cities have been developing since 2000 and in November 2004, an official protocol agreement formalising the sister city relationship was signed.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Emergency Management Arrangements
    LOCAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS Local Emergency Management Arrangements DISCLAIMER IMPORTANT: The City of Armadale makes no representations about the suitability of the information contained in this document or any material related to this document for any purpose. The document is provided without warranty of any kind to the extent permitted by law. The City of Armadale hereby disclaims all warranties and conditions in regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions or merchantability, fitness for particular purpose, title and non‐ infringement. In no event shall the City of Armadale be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from the loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortuous action, arising out of or in connection with the use of information available in this document. The document or material related to this document could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. The City of Armadale Local Emergency Management Arrangements have been prepared and endorsed by the City of Armadale Local Emergency Management Committee (LEMC) pursuant to Section 41(1) of the Emergency Management Act 2005. A copy has been submitted to the State Emergency Management Committee (SEMC) pursuant to section 41(5) of the Emergency Management Act 2005 and a copy has been submitted to the South East District Emergency Management Committee (DEMC) as per item 31 of SEMC PS 2.5. © City of Armadale 2011 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non‐commercial use or use within your organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Advisory Board
    Local Government Advisory Board Annual Report 2017-2018 August 2018 Contents Chair’s Report ............................................................................................................ 4 Role and Function of the Board ............................................................................... 5 The Board’s Guiding Principles ............................................................................... 6 Community of interests ............................................................................................ 6 Physical and topographic features ........................................................................... 6 Demographic trends ................................................................................................. 6 Economic factors ..................................................................................................... 7 History of the area .................................................................................................... 7 Transport and communication .................................................................................. 7 Matters affecting the viability of local governments .................................................. 8 Effective delivery of local government services ........................................................ 8 Membership of the Board ......................................................................................... 9 Member profiles (as at 31 August 2018) ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • City of Swan Our Swan 2030 Discussion Paper – Our Vibrant Economy
    City of Swan our Swan 2030 discussion paper – our vibrant economy s e c l a p e r s e i v d y i t c n e o 2 our Swan 2030 – our vibrant economy Contents 1. Background 4 2. Trends 5 3. Key Considerations 6 3.1 Jobs and Skills 6 3.2 Land Use and Infrastructure 6 3.3 Business Growth and Investment Attraction 6 4. What this means for Swan 7 4.1 Jobs and Skills 7 4.2 Land Use and Infrastructure 7 4.3 Business Growth and Investment Attraction 7 End Notes 7 3 1. Background Building vibrant The City of Swan has a diverse economic base business centres and and strong economic sectors including construction, retailing, manufacturing, property and business ensuring our business services, wholesale trade, agriculture/livestock environment supports and tourism. our growing local As well as a significant growth in population over the last 20 years, industrial, communities, providing commercial and tourism areas have also grown with the development of the Malaga industrial area, the expansion of the Midland retail sector and growth of the Swan Valley jobs, goods and wine region. services and investment The City of Swan is the northern and eastern gateway to regional Western Australia with Great Eastern Highway, Great Northern Highway and the Midland train line all leading opportunities. into Midland. The City of Swan also has major metropolitan arterial roads of Tonkin Highway, Reid Highway and Roe Highway running through or around it, making the City of Swan easy to get to for visitors and an attractive base for businesses with ease of access to metropolitan and regional Western Australia.
    [Show full text]