DOCSLIB.ORG

Jihad-Cum-Zionism-Leninism: Overthrowing the World, German-Style

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jihad-Cum-Zionism-Leninism: Overthrowing the World, German-Style Jihad-cum-Zionism-Leninism: Overthrowing the World, German-Style Sean McMeekin Historically Speaking, Volume 12, Number 3, June 2011, pp. 2-5 (Article) Published by The Johns Hopkins University Press DOI: 10.1353/hsp.2011.0046 For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/hsp/summary/v012/12.3.mcmeekin.html Access Provided by Bilkent Universitesi at 11/26/12 5:31PM GMT 2 Historically Speaking • June 2011 JIHAD-CUM-ZIONISM-LENINISM: ISTORICALLY PEAKING H S OVERTHROWING THE WORLD, June 2011 Vol. XII No. 3 GERMAN-STYLE CONTENTS Jihad-cum-Zionism-Leninism: 2 Sean McMeekin Overthrowing the World, German-Style Sean McMeekin Is “Right Turn” the Wrong Frame for 6 American History after the 1960s? t is often said that the First World War David T. Courtwright marks a watershed in modern history. From the mobilization of armies of un- The Politics of Religion in 8 I fathomable size—more than 60 million men put Modern America: A Review Essay on uniforms between 1914 and 1918—to the no Aaron L. Haberman less mind-boggling human cost of the conflict, Military History at the Operational Level: 10 both at the front and beyond it (estimated mili- An Interview with Robert M. Citino tary and civilian deaths were nearly equal, at Conducted by Donald A. Yerxa some 8 million each), the war of 1914 broke all historical precedent in the scale of its devasta- The Birth of Classical Europe: 13 An Interview with Simon Price and Peter tion. Ruling houses that had endured for cen- Thonemann turies—the Romanov, Habsburg, and Conducted by Donald A. Yerxa Ottoman—shook, tottered, and fell, unleashing yet more misery as these precariously assembled Historical Thinking at the K-12 multiethnic empires were wracked by in- Level in the 21st Century: ternecine warfare. As the war of 1914 spread be- A Roundtable yond Europe into the Balkans and Middle East, The Historian as Translator: 15 racial and religious score-settling and reprisals Historical Thinking, the Rosetta led inevitably to large-scale ethnic cleansing, Stone of History Education with millions of civilians uprooted from their Fritz Fischer ancestral homes, which most would never see Making Historical Thinking a 17 again. Even the victorious Western powers, Natural Act France and Britain, suffered a collapse in cul- Bruce Lesh tural confidence that arguably has never been re- From Albert Bushnell Hart, ed., Harper’s Pictorial Library of the paired. After centuries of progress had brought World War, Volume 2 (Harper and Brothers, 1920). Considering the Hidden 20 the West to a position of unparalleled domina- Challenges of Teaching and tion of global affairs, it took only four years for Learning World History sist in unleashing the dogs of war from their equally the whole glittering edifice of European civilization to Robert B. Bain panic-stricken (and equally pessimistic) Austrian al- fall apart. lies.3 “The Music Is Nothing If the 22 If 1914-18 marked an epitaph for Old Europe, This sort of moderate academic consensus is Audience Is Deaf”: Moving Historical we may usefully ask: Was it murder or suicide? Popu- Thinking into the Wider World usually welcomed. Now that so few historians have a lar historians have usually leaned toward the latter ver- Linda K. Salvucci real personal or patriotic stake in the controversy (as dict, viewing the catastrophe of 1914 as a tragedy of many Germans with memories of both world wars Galileo Then and Now: 25 miscalculation, the idea being that no European still did in the 1960s), scholars working in the field A Review Essay statesmen were truly guilty of intending the war, at least today are spared the bitter acrimony of the Fritz Fis- William R. Shea not the horrendous global war of attrition that it cher years. Even on the level of practical politics, with turned into.1 Since the Fritz Fischer debate of the Tocqueville in America: 28 the centennial approaching, there is now a sense of 1960s professional historians have generally favored An Interview with Leo Damrosch “goodbye to all that”—literally, as the last German Conducted by Randall J. Stephens the former explanation, explaining the war’s outbreak reparations payment was finally processed in 2010!4 in terms of German and/or Austrian premeditation, Much as there is to recommend the current con- God and the Atlantic: An Interview 30 coming down with a verdict of, if not outright homi- with Thomas Albert Howard sensus on the war of 1914, however, there is also cide, then at least civilizational manslaughter. The Conducted by Donald A. Yerxa much not to like. The first problem with any consen- German decision for war in 1914, Holger Herwig sus is that it is static, and unlikely to inspire new schol- Ruptures in History 32 writes in a recent scholarly collection on the conflict, arship. Say what one might about the nastiness of the Bruce Mazlish was not quite Fischer’s aggressive and deliberate “bid Fischer debate: precisely because of its sharp edge it for world power” but rather “a nervous, indeed pan- The Army and Politics in 35 stimulated years of fresh research and passionate ar- icked ‘leap into the dark’ to secure the Reich’s posi- Ancient Egypt gument. A young historian today, by contrast, is not tion of semihegemony on the Continent.”2 In the new Toby Wilkinson likely to be encouraged to tackle perhaps the biggest “consensus” interpretation, Berlin still bears primary question of modern history (responsibility for the responsibility, no longer for premeditated imperial ag- First World War and its consequences) after reading gression in the sense implied by the Versailles Treaty Cover image: “Simple solution of the Panama labor,” Puck, the kind of works published in recent years, which October 18, 1905. Library of Congress, Prints and Photo- and by Fischer, but for an impulsive preemptive strike tend to declare the matter closed to further discus- graphs Division [reproduction number, LC-DIG-ppmsca- to ward off incipient strategic decline, with further 26000]. sion. mitigation in that the Germans received a strong as- The second problem grows directly out of the June 2011 • Historically Speaking 3 first. Scholarly consensus, because it implicitly de- German side, Bethmann Hollweg and especially nies the possibility of argument, tends toward a cer- Moltke have been harshly judged, to be sure— Historically Speaking tain smugness. As David Fromkin answers his own Fromkin even fingers the chief of the German gen- The Bulletin of the Historical Society question in Europe’s Last Summer: Who Started the eral staff as the “modest, unexceptional, and indeed Great War in 1914? (Knopf, 2004), “Briefly and rather ordinary career army officer [who] started the Senior Editors: Joseph S. Lucas and Donald A. Yerxa roughly stated, the answer is that the government Great War.”10 And yet there is mitigation even in this Editor & Designer: Randall J. Stephens of Austria-Hungary started its local war with Ser- judgment: Fromkin cites as evidence of guilt Associate Editor: Scott Hovey bia, while Germany’s military leaders started the Moltke’s later “confession” to having started the Contributing Editors: Joseph Amato, Eric Arnesen, worldwide war against France and Russia that be- war, which suggests a man wracked by moral doubts Andrew Bacevich, Jeremy Black, Fritz Fischer, Thomas J. Fleming, Colin S. Gray, Adam Hochschild, George came known as the First World War or the Great more than an unrepentant war criminal. This is Huppert, Mary Beth Immediata, Mark Killenbeck, War.” Alright, then. What else is there to say? characteristic of what we might call the post-Fis- Bruce Kuklick, Pauline Maier, George Marsden, Bruce Mazlish, Wilfred McClay, William H. McNeill, Allan To be sure, there is wig- cher view of 1914, in which Megill, Joseph Miller, Peter Paret, Linda Salvucci, gle room inside the current the German “crime” was not William R. Shea, Dennis Showalter, Barry Strauss, consensus. Some historians one of conscious aggressive William Stueck, Jr., Carol Thomas, Derek Wilson, John Wilson, John Womack, Bertram Wyatt-Brown focus their fire on the Aus- Could the war really intention, but more a tragic trian statesmen who deliber- decision born of a mixture of © 2011 by The Historical Society. All rights reserved. All texts © The Historical Society unless otherwise ately hounded Serbia into have been about fear and foreboding. noted. No portion of Historically Speaking may be repro- war, others more on the pol- Nuanced as it is, there duced by any process or technique without the formal nothing more than consent of the publisher. Direct all permissions re- icy makers in Berlin who still seems something odd quests to www.press.jhu.edu/cgi-bin/permissions.cgi urged them on.5 Others, like about this sort of bloodless a German officer Historically Speaking (ISSN 1941-4188) is published five Niall Ferguson, accept pri- explanation of the outbreak times a year for The Historical Society by The Johns mary Austro-German re- and his complexes? of the bloodiest war in his- Hopkins University Press, 2715 N. Charles Street, Balti- sponsibility but still have tory (until its sequel arrived in more, MD 21218-4363 harsh words for Britain, 1939). Could the war really Postmaster: Send address changes to Historically Speak- which, alone among the five have been about nothing ing, 656 Beacon St., Mezzanine, Boston, MA 02215 main powers, was aloof enough from the two main more than a German officer and his complexes? Or, Correspondence: Please write the Editors, Historically Speaking, 656 Beacon St., Mezzanine, Boston,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Down in Turkey, Far Away: Human Rights, the Armenian Massacres
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title "Down in Turkey, far away": human rights, the Armenian Massacres, and Orientalism in Wilhelmine Germany Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9403g47p Journal Journal of Modern History, 79(1) ISSN 0022-2801 Author Anderson, ML Publication Date 2007-03-01 DOI 10.1086/517545 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California “Down in Turkey, far away”: Human Rights, the Armenian Massacres, and Orientalism in Wilhelmine Germany Author(s): Margaret Lavinia Anderson Source: The Journal of Modern History, Vol. 79, No. 1 (March 2007), pp. 80-111 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/517545 . Accessed: 07/07/2013 13:58 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Modern History. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 169.229.32.136 on Sun, 7 Jul 2013 13:58:54 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Contemporary Issues in Historical Perspective “Down in Turkey, far away”: Human Rights, the Armenian Massacres, and Orientalism in Wilhelmine Germany* Margaret Lavinia Anderson University of California, Berkeley Famous in the annals of German drama is a scene known as the “Easter stroll,” in which the playwright takes leave, briefly, from his plot to depict a cross section of small-town humanity enjoying their holiday.
    [Show full text]
  • The War to End War — the Great War
    GO TO MASTER INDEX OF WARFARE GIVING WAR A CHANCE, THE NEXT PHASE: THE WAR TO END WAR — THE GREAT WAR “They fight and fight and fight; they are fighting now, they fought before, and they’ll fight in the future.... So you see, you can say anything about world history.... Except one thing, that is. It cannot be said that world history is reasonable.” — Fyodor Mikhaylovich Dostoevski NOTES FROM UNDERGROUND “Fiddle-dee-dee, war, war, war, I get so bored I could scream!” —Scarlet O’Hara “Killing to end war, that’s like fucking to restore virginity.” — Vietnam-era protest poster HDT WHAT? INDEX THE WAR TO END WAR THE GREAT WAR GO TO MASTER INDEX OF WARFARE 1851 October 2, Thursday: Ferdinand Foch, believed to be the leader responsible for the Allies winning World War I, was born. October 2, Thursday: PM. Some of the white Pines on Fair Haven Hill have just reached the acme of their fall;–others have almost entirely shed their leaves, and they are scattered over the ground and the walls. The same is the state of the Pitch pines. At the Cliffs I find the wasps prolonging their short lives on the sunny rocks just as they endeavored to do at my house in the woods. It is a little hazy as I look into the west today. The shrub oaks on the terraced plain are now almost uniformly of a deep red. HDT WHAT? INDEX THE WAR TO END WAR THE GREAT WAR GO TO MASTER INDEX OF WARFARE 1914 World War I broke out in the Balkans, pitting Britain, France, Italy, Russia, Serbia, the USA, and Japan against Austria, Germany, and Turkey, because Serbians had killed the heir to the Austrian throne in Bosnia.
    [Show full text]
  • Stoney Road out of Eden: the Struggle to Recover Insurance For
    Scholarly Commons @ UNLV Boyd Law Scholarly Works Faculty Scholarship 2012 Stoney Road Out of Eden: The Struggle to Recover Insurance for Armenian Genocide Deaths and Its Implications for the Future of State Authority, Contract Rights, and Human Rights Jeffrey W. Stempel University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law Sarig Armenian David McClure University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub Part of the Contracts Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, Insurance Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, National Security Law Commons, and the President/Executive Department Commons Recommended Citation Stempel, Jeffrey W.; Armenian, Sarig; and McClure, David, "Stoney Road Out of Eden: The Struggle to Recover Insurance for Armenian Genocide Deaths and Its Implications for the Future of State Authority, Contract Rights, and Human Rights" (2012). Scholarly Works. 851. https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub/851 This Article is brought to you by the Scholarly Commons @ UNLV Boyd Law, an institutional repository administered by the Wiener-Rogers Law Library at the William S. Boyd School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STONEY ROAD OUT OF EDEN: THE STRUGGLE TO RECOVER INSURANCE FOR ARMENIAN GENOCIDE DEATHS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE FUTURE OF STATE AUTHORITY, CONTRACT RIGHTS, AND HUMAN RIGHTS Je:jrev' W. Stempel Saris' ArInenian Davi' McClure* Intro d uctio n .................................................... 3 I. The Long Road to the Genocide Insurance Litigation ...... 7 A. The Millet System of Non-Geographic Ethno-Religious Administrative Autonomy ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Origins of the First World War
    The Russian Origins of the First World War The Russian Origins of the First World War Sean McMeekin The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts • London, Eng land 2011 Copyright © 2011 by Sean McMeekin All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in- Publication Data McMeekin, Sean, 1974– The Russian origins of the First World War / Sean McMeekin. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-674-06210-8 (alk. paper) 1. World War, 1914–1918—Causes. 2. World War, 1914–1918—Russia. 3. Russia—Foreign relations—1894–1917. 4. Imperialism—History— 20th century. 5. World War, 1914–1918—Campaigns—Eastern Front. 6. World War, 1914–1918—Campaigns—Middle East. I. Title. D514.M35 2011 940.3'11—dc23 2011031427 For Ayla Contents Abbreviations ix Author’s Note xi Introduction: History from the Deep Freeze 1 1. The Strategic Imperative in 1914 6 2. It Takes Two to Tango: The July Crisis 41 3. Russia’s War: The Opening Round 76 4. Turkey’s Turn 98 5. The Russians and Gallipoli 115 6. Russia and the Armenians 141 7. The Russians in Persia 175 8. Partitioning the Ottoman Empire 194 9. 1917: The Tsarist Empire at Its Zenith 214 Conclusion: The October Revolution and Historical Amnesia 234 Notes 245 Bibliography 289 Acknowledgments 303 Index 307 Maps The Russian Empire on the Eve of World War I 8 The Polish Salient 18 The Peacetime Deployment of Russia’s Army Corps 20 The Initial Mobilization Pattern on the Eastern Front 83 Russian Claims on Austrian and German Territory 91 “The Straits,” and Russian Claims on Them 132 Russia and the Armenians 167 Persia and the Caucasian Front 187 The Partition of the Ottoman Empire 206 The Eastern Front 219 Abbreviations ATASE Askeri Tarih ve Stratejik Etüt Başkanlığı Arşivi (Archive of the Turkish Gen- eral Staff).
    [Show full text]
  • Austria-Hungary and the First World War », Histoire@Politique
    Alan Sked, « Austria-Hungary and the First World War », Histoire@Politique. Politique, culture, société, n° 22, janvier-avril 2014 [en ligne, www.histoire-politique.fr] Austria-Hungary and the First World War Alan Sked In a lecture to the Royal Historical Society some years ago,1 I2 distinguished between two schools of thought regarding the role of the Habsburg Monarchy in the origins of the First World War. The first regarded the failure of the dynasty to implement domestic reforms, particularly some timely, well-designed scheme for federal reorganization, as having forced it in 1914 to go to war to prevent the ‘nationality question’ from destabilizing, indeed destroying it from within. This school of thought was particularly associated with American historians. The second school, associated mainly with British historians, argued that the ‘nationality question’ was irrelevant in 1914; war came about, instead, on account of questions of foreign policy and dynastic honour or prestige. I myself have always supported this second viewpoint which is clear from my Decline and Fall of the Habsburg Empire, 1815-1918 (2001).3 In it I argue that the decision to declare war on Serbia was explicable though hardly rational, given the Monarchy’s military unpreparedness and the likelihood of a world war ensuing, and given that Franz Joseph in the past had managed to co-exist with a united Germany and Italy after successful military challenges to Austria’s leadership in both these countries. There is now, of course, a huge literature on the origins of the First World War, and a large one on a variety of aspects of the ‘nationality question’ inside the Monarchy in the period leading up to 1914.
    [Show full text]
  • View the Full Conference Program
    COVER: Cover of “Dos revolutsyonere rusland” (Revolutionary Russia), an illustrated anthology of current events in Russia published by the Jewish Labor Bund in New York, 1917. YIVO Library. YIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH PRESENTS CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 5 AND 6, 2017 — CO-SPONSORED BY — — RECEPTION SPONSOR — 1 THE TWO DEFINING MOMENTS of the last century were, arguably, the Holocaust and the Russian Revolution. The tragic impact of the Holocaust on Jews is self-evident; their prominent, if also profoundly paradoxical, role in the Russian Revolution is the subject of this pathbreaking YIVO conference. The Russian Revolution liberated the largest Jewish community in the world. It also opened the floodgates for the greatest massacre of Jews before the Second World War amid the civil war and its aftermath in 1918-21. Once the Bolshevik rule was then consolidated, Jews entered into nearly every sphere of Russian life while, in time, much of the singular richness of Jewish cultural life in Russia was flattened, eventually obliterated. 2 SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2017 MONDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2017 9:00am JONATHAN BRENT, 9:00am DAVID MYERS, President, CJH Executive Director & CEO, YIVO Introductory Remarks Introductory Remarks KEYNOTE ELISSA BEMPORAD KEYNOTE SAMUEL KASSOW From Berdichev to Minsk and Setting the Stage for 1917 Onward to Moscow: The Jews and the Bolshevik Revolution 10:00am CATRIONA KELLY SESSION 1 The End of Empire: Jewish Children 10:00am ZVI GITELMAN in the Age of Revolution LEADING SESSION 1 The Rise and Fall of Jews in the Soviet Secret
    [Show full text]
  • Stalin's War and Peace by Nina L. Khrushcheva
    Stalin’s War and Peace by Nina L. Khrushcheva - Project Syndicate 5/7/21, 12:57 PM Global Bookmark Stalin’s War and Peace May 7, 2021 | NINA L. KHRUSHCHEVA Sean McMeekin, Stalin’s War: A New History of World War II, Allen Lane, London; Basic Books, New York, 2021. Jonathan Haslam, The Spectre of War: International Communism and the Origins of World War II, Princeton University Press, 2021. Norman M. Naimark, Stalin and the Fate of Europe: The Postwar Struggle for Sovereignty, Harvard University Press, 2019. Francine Hirsch, Soviet Judgment at Nuremberg: A New History of the International Military Tribunal after World War II, Oxford University Press, 2020. MOSCOW – From the 2008 war in Georgia to the 2014 annexation of Crimea and the build- up of troops along Ukraine’s eastern and southern borders just this spring, Russia’s actions in recent years have been increasingly worrying. Could history – in particular, the behavior of Joseph Stalin’s Soviet Union after World War II – give Western leaders the insights they need to mitigate the threat? The authors of several recent books about Stalin seem to think so. But not everyone gets the story right. Instead, modern observers often fall into the trap of reshaping history to fit prevailing ideological molds. This has fed an often-sensationalized narrative that is not only unhelpful, but that also plays into Russian President Vladimir Putin’s hands. Nowhere is this more obvious than in the perception, popular in the West, that Putin is a strategic genius – always thinking several moves ahead. Somehow, Putin anticipates his https://www.project-syndicate.org/onpoint/stalin-putin-russia-rel…ad5b7d8-3e09706d97-104308209&mc_cid=3e09706d97&mc_eid=b29a3cca96 Page 1 of 8 Stalin’s War and Peace by Nina L.
    [Show full text]
  • The Armenian Massacre and Its Avengers the Ramifications of the Assassination of Talaat Pasha in Berlin by Rolf Hosfeld
    IP – Transatlantic Edition The Armenian Massacre and Its Avengers The ramifications of the assassination of Talaat Pasha in Berlin by Rolf Hosfeld The 1921 trial in Berlin of Mehmet Talaat’s Armenian assassin, Sogho- mon Tehlirian, sent reverberations around the world. Two young law stu- dents at the time would go on, respectively, to become the assistant prose- cutor at the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal and to give a name to the wholesale Nazi murders–“genocide.” The trigger to Raphael Lemkin’s de- velopment of the legal concept of genocide was the Armenian massacre. On the ides of March in 1921 the last Grand Vizier of the Ottoman Empire was assassinated in the center of Berlin by an Armenian revolutionary. Mehmet Talaat had fled to the German capital before the World War I Al- lies occupied Constantinople in 1918 and was living there under a pseud- onym. He had had a meteoric rise after the revolution against Sultan Abdul Hamid II in 1908, and especially after the coup of the Young Turks in 1913, to become the most influential man in the Committee of Union and Progress that ruled dictatorially in Constantinople. At the time of his death, Talaat Pasha was already well-known in Germany as the mastermind of the ROLF HOSFELD is persecution of the Ottoman Armenians, which claimed more than a million a journalist in Berlin. lives from 1915 to 1917. His book, Operation Nemesis. Die Türkei, In the Berlin trial of Talaat’s assassin, Soghomon Tehlirian, defense law- Deutschland und yers portrayed their client as a modern-day William Tell.
    [Show full text]
  • A Danish Diplomat in Constantinople During the Armenian Genocide
    Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal Volume 1 Issue 2 Article 8 September 2006 “When the Cannons Talk, the Diplomats Must Be Silent”: A Danish Diplomat in Constantinople during the Armenian Genocide Matthias Bjørnlund Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp Recommended Citation Bjørnlund, Matthias (2006) "“When the Cannons Talk, the Diplomats Must Be Silent”: A Danish Diplomat in Constantinople during the Armenian Genocide," Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal: Vol. 1: Iss. 2: Article 8. Available at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol1/iss2/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Access Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ‘‘When the Cannons Talk, the Diplomats Must Be Silent’’: A Danish Diplomat in Constantinople during the Armenian Genocide Matthias Bjørnlund Copenhagen, Denmark The envoy Carl Ellis Wandel was the sole Danish diplomatic representative in Constantinople before, during, and after World War I, and between 1914 and 1925 he wrote hundreds of detailed reports on the destruction of the Ottoman Armenians, as well as on related subjects. This article analyzes and contextualizes some of his most important reports, showing how these hitherto unknown sources contribute to the understanding of vital aspects of the Armenian Genocide, not least concerning the ongoing scholarly debate between ‘‘intentionalist’’ and ‘‘structuralist’’ interpretations of the event and concerning the destruction of the Ottoman Armenians as a particularly radical part of a Young Turk project of Turkification.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Role of Turkey in British Foreign Policy, 1908-1914
    Assessing the role of Turkey in British Foreign Policy, 1908-1914 Simon Richard Tate Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History, University of East Anglia April 2020 This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that use of any information derived therefrom must be in accordance with current UK Copyright Law. In addition, any quotation or extract must include full attribution. Abstract The future of the Ottoman Empire was an important issue in international politics during the early years of the Twentieth Century. As more and more of its territory was chipped away, the events caused by this this process of disintegration became central to Great Power relations in the period before the First World War. These developments were particularly significant from the British perspective, not only because the Young Turk revolution of 1908 seemed to promise a brighter future for Anglo-Turkish relations, but because the British interest in maintaining the Ottoman Empire for as long as possible, for fear of what came next, directly conflicted with the more aggressive designs of Russia, one of the two Powers with which Britain had recently become aligned. Much of the literature on Anglo-Turkish relations of the period has tended to argue that a ‘golden opportunity’ existed for Britain to improve her relations with the Ottoman Empire following the coming to power of the ‘Young Turks’, who were, both at the time and in more recent scholarship, asserted to have possessed Anglophile tendencies.
    [Show full text]
  • A Danish Diplomat in Constantinople During the Armenian Genocide Matthias Bjørnlund
    Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal Volume 1 | 2006 Issue 2 | Article 8 “When the Cannons Talk, the Diplomats Must Be Silent”: A Danish Diplomat in Constantinople during the Armenian Genocide Matthias Bjørnlund Abstract. The ne voy Carl Ellis Wandel was the sole Danish diplomatic representative in Constantinople before, during, and after World War I, and between 1914 and 1925 he wrote hundreds of detailed reports on the destruction of the Ottoman Armenians, as well as on related subjects. This article analyzes and contextualizes some of his most important reports, showing how these hitherto unknown sources contribute to the understanding of vital aspects of the Armenian Genocide, not least concerning the ongoing scholarly debate between ‘‘intentionalist’’ and ‘‘structuralist’’ interpretations of the event and concerning the destruction of the Ottoman Armenians as a particularly radical part of a Young Turk project of Turkification. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp Recommended Citation Bjørnlund, Matthias (2006) "“When the Cannons Talk, the Diplomats Must Be Silent”: A Danish Diplomat in Constantinople during the Armenian Genocide," Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal: Vol. 1: Iss. 2: Article 8. Available at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol1/iss2/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ‘‘When the Cannons Talk, the Diplomats Must Be Silent’’: A Danish Diplomat in Constantinople during the Armenian Genocide Matthias Bjørnlund Copenhagen, Denmark The envoy Carl Ellis Wandel was the sole Danish diplomatic representative in Constantinople before, during, and after World War I, and between 1914 and 1925 he wrote hundreds of detailed reports on the destruction of the Ottoman Armenians, as well as on related subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Anglo-Turkish Relations Volume 2 Number 2 June 2021
    Journal of Anglo-Turkish Relations Volume 2 Number 2 June 2021 Portraits from War to Peace: Britain and Turkey (1914-1939) Nur Bilge Criss1 Abstract The purpose of this article is threefold. One is to address an age-old foreign policy framework that shaped Anglo-Turkish relations prior to and in the aftermath of World War I (WWI). Namely, how the Eastern Question came to bear on the ideational level and in practice in Anglo-Ottoman/Turkish relations. Secondly, punitive peace conditions were imposed on the Central Powers under the unprecedented demand for unconditional surrender. Victors did not take into consideration the possibility of resistance, let alone armed resistance from the defunct Ottoman Empire whose core territories, including its capital were under Allied occupation. A state of war continued until a negotiated peace was concluded in 1924. Peace-making was formalized in 1920, but mainly in terms dictated by the Allies. Hence, a state of war continued until resistance prevailed in 1924. The third aspect of the saga was peacebuilding. European conjuncture of the 1930s forced London and Ankara, by then the capital of the Republic of Turkey, to mend fences albeit reluctantly for the former, but facilitated by diplomats. Consequently, inspired by the English poet Alexander Pope that “the proper study of mankind is man,”2 this article analyses the politics of war, its aftermath, peace-making, and peacebuilding through portraits of public influencers, decision makers and diplomats who were practitioners of policy. Inherent during this timeframe is how assumptions about their political future resonated on their Turkish interlocutors.
    [Show full text]