WILDCARE Wild & Open Space 2001
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Antipredator Behaviour of Red-Necked Pademelons: a Factor Contributing to Species Survival?
Animal Conservation (2002) 5, 325–331 © 2002 The Zoological Society of London DOI:10.1017/S1367943002004080 Printed in the United Kingdom Antipredator behaviour of red-necked pademelons: a factor contributing to species survival? Daniel T. Blumstein1,2, Janice C. Daniel1,2, Marcus R. Schnell2,3, Jodie G. Ardron2,4 and Christopher S. Evans4 1 Department of Organismic Biology, Ecology and Evolution, 621 Charles E. Young Drive South, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA 2 Cooperative Research Centre for the Conservation and Management of Marsupials, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia 3 Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia 4 Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia (Received 15 January 2002; accepted 17 June 2002) Abstract Australian mammals have one of the world’s worst records of recent extinctions. A number of stud- ies have demonstrated that red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) have a profound effect on the population biol- ogy of some species. However, not all species exposed to fox predation have declined. We studied the antipredator behaviour of a species that has not declined – the red-necked pademelon (Thylogale thetis), and contrasted it with previous studies on a species that has declined – the tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii), to try to understand behavioural factors associated with survival. We focused on two antipredator behaviours: predator recognition and the way in which antipredator vigilance is influ- enced by the presence of conspecifics. We found that predator-naïve pademelons responded to the sight of certain predators, suggesting that they had some degree of innate recognition ability. -
Macropod Herpesviruses Dec 2013
Herpesviruses and macropods Fact sheet Introductory statement Despite the widespread distribution of herpesviruses across a large range of macropod species there is a lack of detailed knowledge about these viruses and the effects they have on their hosts. While they have been associated with significant mortality events infections are usually benign, producing no or minimal clinical effects in their adapted hosts. With increasing emphasis being placed on captive breeding, reintroduction and translocation programs there is a greater likelihood that these viruses will be introduced into naïve macropod populations. The effects and implications of this type of viral movement are unclear. Aetiology Herpesviruses are enveloped DNA viruses that range in size from 120 to 250nm. The family Herpesviridae is divided into three subfamilies. Alphaherpesviruses have a moderately wide host range, rapid growth, lyse infected cells and have the capacity to establish latent infections primarily, but not exclusively, in nerve ganglia. Betaherpesviruses have a more restricted host range, a long replicative cycle, the capacity to cause infected cells to enlarge and the ability to form latent infections in secretory glands, lymphoreticular tissue, kidneys and other tissues. Gammaherpesviruses have a narrow host range, replicate in lymphoid cells, may induce neoplasia in infected cells and form latent infections in lymphoid tissue (Lachlan and Dubovi 2011, Roizman and Pellet 2001). There have been five herpesvirus species isolated from macropods, three alphaherpesviruses termed Macropodid Herpesvirus 1 (MaHV1), Macropodid Herpesvirus 2 (MaHV2), and Macropodid Herpesvirus 4 (MaHV4) and two gammaherpesviruses including Macropodid Herpesvirus 3 (MaHV3), and a currently unclassified novel gammaherpesvirus detected in swamp wallabies (Wallabia bicolor) (Callinan and Kefford 1981, Finnie et al. -
Tasman National Park Reservation History
Tasman National Park Reservation History The Tasman National Park incorporates a number of former reserves. The history of each of these reserve areas is provided separately below. Each history has been compiled from a variety of sources and whilst all effort has been made there can be no assurance that it is a complete and accurate historical record for this reserve. History last updated 12 August 2010 Tasman Island Nature Reserve Date Description 12 April 1904 The island known as ‘Tasman Island’ situated to the south east of Cape Pillar, Tasman Peninsula, was except from sale and reserved for the purpose of a lighthouse reserve, and was taken to have been so declared under the Crown Lands Act 1903. 22 December 1993 108 hectares of land (indicated on CPR Plan 2790; LD 1318) was proclaimed to be a conservation area and a State reserve and given the name Tasman Island Nature Reserve under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1970 (Statutory Rules 270 of 1993). 30 April 1999 On commencement of the relevant sections of the Regional Forest Agreement (Land Classification) Act 1999, Tasman Island Nature Reserve was incorporated into Tasman National Park (CPR Plan 4215) under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1970 . Tasman Arch State Reserve Date Description 24 July 1917 An area of land consisting 57ha in the Tasman Arch and Blowhole area were proclaimed a scenic reserve, under the Scenery Preservation Act 1915. 28 June 1938 Ninety acres of land (approx 36.4 hectares), comprising foreshore areas at Eagle Hawk Neck and Pirates Bay, and thirty acres (approx 12.1 hectares) in the Waterfall Bay area was proclaimed a scenic reserve, under the Scenery Preservation Act 1915 (see Plan 4772). -
House of Assembly Thursday 12 November 2020
PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY REPORT OF DEBATES Thursday 12 November 2020 REVISED EDITION Thursday 12 November 2020 The Speaker, Ms Hickey, took the Chair at 10 a.m., acknowledged the Traditional People and read Prayers. QUESTIONS Launceston General Hospital - Commission of Inquiry into Child Abuse Claims Ms WHITE question to MINISTER for HEALTH, Ms COURTNEY [10.03 a.m.] On what date were you first made aware of the series of horrific allegations of child sexual abuse involving nurse Jim Griffin at the Launceston General Hospital? ANSWER Madam Speaker, I can inform the House and the member that advice was provided on 31 July 2019; that the LGH had received advice earlier that day that a member of staff was subject to immediate suspension of his registration to work with vulnerable people. I was advised that day. Launceston General Hospital - Commission of Inquiry into Child Abuse Claims Ms WHITE question to MINISTER for HEALTH, Ms COURTNEY [10.04 a.m.] You have clearly failed to grasp the magnitude of Jim Griffin's crimes and the deep impact they have had on the community. You clearly do not feel responsible for your inaction and you do not want to be held accountable either. Yesterday you were asked why you waited a year - and now we have heard perhaps even longer since you knew - to establish an independent inquiry into the horrific child abuse perpetrated by former Launceston General nurse, Jim Griffin. You have attempted to hide behind police investigations as a reason for your inaction when those investigations ended in October last year when Jim Griffin died. -
Three Capes Track
DRAFT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN Three Capes Track Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment ISBN 978-0-9871899-2-9 (print version) ISBN 978-0-9871899-3-6 (pdf version) © State of Tasmania 2011 Cover image: Cape Pillar by Joe Shemesh Published by: Parks and Wildlife Service Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment GPO Box 1751 Hobart TAS 7001 Cite as: Parks and Wildlife Service 2011, Draft Three Capes Track Development Proposal and Environmental Management Plan, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart CONTENTS Forward ............................................................................................................................................................................................... i Executive Summary..........................................................................................................................................................................ii 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Project Overview ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Current Status of the Proposal ............................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Approvals Process -
Tasman National Park
Caring for Tasmania since 1968 THE TASMANIAN CONSERVATIONIST Number 312 September 2007 Tasman National Park Natural values to be compromised by tourism enterprise? Seal haul-out at Cape Raoul, Tasman Peninsula The Tasmanian Conservationist is the regular Contents newsletter of the Tasmanian Conservation Trust Inc, 102 Bathurst Street, Hobart, Tasmania 7000. New CEO appointed 3 ABN: 63 091 237 520 Phone (03) 6234 3552 Fax: (03) 6231 2491 From the President 4 email: [email protected] TCT Strategic Plan 2007 – 2008 5 website: http://www.tct.org.au Tasman National Park 7 CEO: Christian Bell Road Kill Survey by Push Bike 8 President: Bob Graham Coastal Development 9 The views expressed in this newsletter are not necessarily those of the Tasmanian Our Threatened Flora Need Your Help 10 Conservation Trust Inc (TCT). Annual Report to Members: Biodiversity Conservation 11 We permit photocopying of all original Coastal and Marine 13 material in The Tasmanian Conservationist. Feel free to make use of our news and articles, Water Management 13 but please acknowledge the source. Waste Management 14 Contributions: We encourage our readers to Land Management 14 submit articles of interest for publication. Articles should preferably be short (up to 600 words) and Legislation and Committees 15 well illustrated. Please forward copy on computer disk or by email if possible. Guidelines for contributors are available from the TCT office. We reserve the right to edit contributions. North-West Branch Tasmanian Conservation Trust Deadline for next issue: 30 November 2007 Meetings of the North-West Branch of the TCT are held on the first Wednesday of each month. -
Convict Trail
CONVICT TRAIL From historic Richmond to the Tasman START: Hobart DURATION: 1 - 3 days National Park, Eaglehawk Neck and NATIONAL PARKS ON THIS ROUTE: Port Arthur Historic Site, this fascinating > Tasman National Park journey is rich in convict history and natural beauty. The Tasman Peninsula is a place of breathtaking seascapes, some of the tallest sea cliffs in the world, and wild ocean views. LEG TIME / DISTANCE Hobart to Richmond 25 min / 27 km Richmond to Port Arthur 1 hr 10 min / 83 km Port Arthur to Hobart 1 hr 20 min / 95 km Hobart - Richmond > Drive to the village of Richmond, with its colonial past, antique shops, art and craft galleries, restaurants and tea rooms. > Richmond is a perfect place to learn about Tasmania’s rich heritage and is home to Australia’s oldest bridge, built by convict labour between 1823 and 1825, Australia’s oldest still-standing Catholic Church - St Johns - built in 1836, and Australia’s oldest gaol, built in 1825. > Also of interest is Old Hobart Town, a carefully constructed model of Hobart as it was in 1820. > Close by are the vineyards and wineries of the Coal River Valley, part of the Southern Tasmanian Wine Regions where you can taste award-winning cool-climate wines. > The region is also rich in produce including cheese and olives. Why not enjoy a long lunch at Frogmore Creek or Pooley Wines. Afterwards enjoy a row on the river or a relax on the riverbanks. > Overnight Richmond or return Hobart #discovertasmania fb.com/discovertasmania @tasmania WWW.DISCOVERTASMANIA.COM.AU Richmond - Port Arthur > On the way to Port Arthur stop at the Colonial and Convict Exhibition in Copping, with its extensive collection of interesting convict artifacts. -
East Tasmania, 2017
South -East Tasmania - Nov / Dec 2017 The main activity on this two week trip to Tasmania was to spend a week rafting the Franklyn River, a dream of mine for 15 years. When the rafting was done I wanted to use my remaining week to visit a couple of mammal watching sites in SE Tasmania. Both Port Arthur and Melaleuca were new sites for me whilst Bruny Island I had visited earlier in the year. I try not to revisit sites but the sheer number of Eastern Quolls on Bruny was too much to resist. I used Dave Watts fabulous book “Where to see wildlife in Tasmania,” David Andrews “The complete guide to finding the mammals of Australia” and of course Jon Hall’s mammal watching website for information when planning the trip. The Rafting Trip on the Franklyn River was with the company “Water by Nature” and comes highly recommended. The only mammals seen on this part of the trip was an Echidna crossing the road on the bus journey through the central plateau to the start point on the Collingwood River and three Platypus on the Lower Franklyn. Although Quolls and Antechinus are often seen at overnight camp spots. I was too exhausted after a hard day on the river to spotlight during this part of the trip. Melaleuca – Sun 26th Mon 27th Nov. Melaleuca is an isolated site on the South Coast of Tasmania. There are no roads so the easiest way to access this remote spot is by plane. I flew with Par Avion from Cambridge Airfield, Hobart into Melaleuca and the 40 minute flight is breathtaking passing over Mt Wellington and the South West of the state before descending through the middle of the Arthur Ranges into Melaleuca. -
Wildlife Parasitology in Australia: Past, Present and Future
CSIRO PUBLISHING Australian Journal of Zoology, 2018, 66, 286–305 Review https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO19017 Wildlife parasitology in Australia: past, present and future David M. Spratt A,C and Ian Beveridge B AAustralian National Wildlife Collection, National Research Collections Australia, CSIRO, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. BVeterinary Clinical Centre, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Werribee, Vic. 3030, Australia. CCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Wildlife parasitology is a highly diverse area of research encompassing many fields including taxonomy, ecology, pathology and epidemiology, and with participants from extremely disparate scientific fields. In addition, the organisms studied are highly dissimilar, ranging from platyhelminths, nematodes and acanthocephalans to insects, arachnids, crustaceans and protists. This review of the parasites of wildlife in Australia highlights the advances made to date, focussing on the work, interests and major findings of researchers over the years and identifies current significant gaps that exist in our understanding. The review is divided into three sections covering protist, helminth and arthropod parasites. The challenge to document the diversity of parasites in Australia continues at a traditional level but the advent of molecular methods has heightened the significance of this issue. Modern methods are providing an avenue for major advances in documenting and restructuring the phylogeny of protistan parasites in particular, while facilitating the recognition of species complexes in helminth taxa previously defined by traditional morphological methods. The life cycles, ecology and general biology of most parasites of wildlife in Australia are extremely poorly understood. While the phylogenetic origins of the Australian vertebrate fauna are complex, so too are the likely origins of their parasites, which do not necessarily mirror those of their hosts. -
Ba3444 MAMMAL BOOKLET FINAL.Indd
Intot Obliv i The disappearing native mammals of northern Australia Compiled by James Fitzsimons Sarah Legge Barry Traill John Woinarski Into Oblivion? The disappearing native mammals of northern Australia 1 SUMMARY Since European settlement, the deepest loss of Australian biodiversity has been the spate of extinctions of endemic mammals. Historically, these losses occurred mostly in inland and in temperate parts of the country, and largely between 1890 and 1950. A new wave of extinctions is now threatening Australian mammals, this time in northern Australia. Many mammal species are in sharp decline across the north, even in extensive natural areas managed primarily for conservation. The main evidence of this decline comes consistently from two contrasting sources: robust scientifi c monitoring programs and more broad-scale Indigenous knowledge. The main drivers of the mammal decline in northern Australia include inappropriate fi re regimes (too much fi re) and predation by feral cats. Cane Toads are also implicated, particularly to the recent catastrophic decline of the Northern Quoll. Furthermore, some impacts are due to vegetation changes associated with the pastoral industry. Disease could also be a factor, but to date there is little evidence for or against it. Based on current trends, many native mammals will become extinct in northern Australia in the next 10-20 years, and even the largest and most iconic national parks in northern Australia will lose native mammal species. This problem needs to be solved. The fi rst step towards a solution is to recognise the problem, and this publication seeks to alert the Australian community and decision makers to this urgent issue. -
Behind the Scenes
©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd 311 Behind the Scenes SEND US YOUR FEEDBACK We love to hear from travellers – your comments keep us on our toes and help make our books better. Our well-travelled team reads every word on what you loved or loathed about this book. Although we cannot reply individually to your submissions, we always guarantee that your feed- back goes straight to the appropriate authors, in time for the next edition. Each person who sends us information is thanked in the next edition – the most useful submissions are rewarded with a selection of digital PDF chapters. Visit lonelyplanet.com/contact to submit your updates and suggestions or to ask for help. Our award-winning website also features inspirational travel stories, news and discussions. Note: We may edit, reproduce and incorporate your comments in Lonely Planet products such as guidebooks, websites and digital products, so let us know if you don’t want your comments reproduced or your name acknowledged. For a copy of our privacy policy visit lonelyplanet.com/ privacy. particularly Mark, Cath, Fred, Lucy and the kids OUR READERS in Hobart, and Helen in Launceston. Special Many thanks to the travellers who used thanks as always to Meg, my road-trippin’ the last edition and wrote to us with help- sweetheart, and our daughters Ione and Remy ful hints, useful advice and interesting who provided countless laughs, unscheduled anecdotes: pit-stops and ground-level perspectives along Brian Rieusset, David Thames, Garry the way. Greenwood, Jan Lehmann, Janice Blakebrough, Jon & Linley Dodd, Kevin Callaghan, Lisa Meg Worby Walker, Megan McKay, Melanie Tait, Owen A big thank you to Tasmin, once again. -
3966 Tour Op 4Col
The Tasmanian Advantage natural and cultural features of Tasmania a resource manual aimed at developing knowledge and interpretive skills specific to Tasmania Contents 1 INTRODUCTION The aim of the manual Notesheets & how to use them Interpretation tips & useful references Minimal impact tourism 2 TASMANIA IN BRIEF Location Size Climate Population National parks Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area (WHA) Marine reserves Regional Forest Agreement (RFA) 4 INTERPRETATION AND TIPS Background What is interpretation? What is the aim of your operation? Principles of interpretation Planning to interpret Conducting your tour Research your content Manage the potential risks Evaluate your tour Commercial operators information 5 NATURAL ADVANTAGE Antarctic connection Geodiversity Marine environment Plant communities Threatened fauna species Mammals Birds Reptiles Freshwater fishes Invertebrates Fire Threats 6 HERITAGE Tasmanian Aboriginal heritage European history Convicts Whaling Pining Mining Coastal fishing Inland fishing History of the parks service History of forestry History of hydro electric power Gordon below Franklin dam controversy 6 WHAT AND WHERE: EAST & NORTHEAST National parks Reserved areas Great short walks Tasmanian trail Snippets of history What’s in a name? 7 WHAT AND WHERE: SOUTH & CENTRAL PLATEAU 8 WHAT AND WHERE: WEST & NORTHWEST 9 REFERENCES Useful references List of notesheets 10 NOTESHEETS: FAUNA Wildlife, Living with wildlife, Caring for nature, Threatened species, Threats 11 NOTESHEETS: PARKS & PLACES Parks & places,