DOCSLIB.ORG

Code of Practice Wildlife

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Code of Practice Wildlife Code of Practice Wildlife Minimum standards for exhibiting wildlife in Queensland Code of Practice of the Australasian Regional Association of Zoological Parks and Aquaria Minimum standards for exhibiting wildlife in Queensland Nature Conservation Act 1992 Page 1 of 100 • 080617 Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry www.daff.qld.gov.au Code of Practice Minimum standards for exhibiting wildlife in Queensland Table of Contents General conditions ..............................................................................................................................7 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 7 1. Husbandry .................................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 General requirements ...............................................................................................................7 1.2 Food requirements.................................................................................................................... 8 1.3 Display requirements ................................................................................................................8 2. Records....................................................................................................................................... 9 3. Transport .................................................................................................................................... 9 4. Provisions of other Acts.......................................................................................................... 10 Appendix 1 — Some conditions relating to the establishment of a wildlife park as required under Environmental Protection Agency Policy.......................................................................................... 10 Appendix 2 — Suggested animal record keeping system ................................................................ 11 Part A — Koalas Phascolarctos cinereus........................................................................................ 16 General information........................................................................................................................... 16 1. Husbandry ................................................................................................................................16 2. Facilities.................................................................................................................................... 17 3. Diet and feeding ....................................................................................................................... 17 4. Records..................................................................................................................................... 18 4.1 Identification............................................................................................................................ 18 4.2 Records................................................................................................................................... 18 5. Transport .................................................................................................................................. 19 5.1 General ................................................................................................................................... 19 5.2 Journeys over two hours......................................................................................................... 19 5.3 Journeys of less than two hours ............................................................................................. 19 6. Quarantine ................................................................................................................................19 7. Photographic opportunities and handling............................................................................. 19 7.1 Types of photographic opportunities....................................................................................... 19 7.2 Conditions on handling for Section 7.1 a) b) c) — Types of photographic purposes.............. 20 7.3 Conditions relating to Section 7.1 d) — Types of photographic purposes .............................. 20 8. Death of stock .......................................................................................................................... 20 9. Provisions of other Acts.......................................................................................................... 21 Appendix 1 — Koala monthly weighing record ................................................................................. 21 Part B — Macropods (kangaroos, wallabies and allies)................................................................. 22 General information........................................................................................................................... 22 1. Husbandry ................................................................................................................................22 2. Facilities.................................................................................................................................... 23 2.1 Construction............................................................................................................................ 23 2.2 Fences .................................................................................................................................... 23 2.3 Enclosure furniture.................................................................................................................. 23 2.4 Inter/intra-specific aggression reduction ................................................................................. 24 Page 2 of 100 • 080617 Code of Practice Minimum standards for exhibiting wildlife in Queensland 2.5 Space requirements................................................................................................................ 24 2.6 Nocturnal house...................................................................................................................... 26 2.7 Capture methods .................................................................................................................... 26 3. Diet and feeding ....................................................................................................................... 26 4. Records..................................................................................................................................... 26 4.1 Identification............................................................................................................................ 26 5. Transport .................................................................................................................................. 26 5.1 General ................................................................................................................................... 26 5.2 Journeys over two hour........................................................................................................... 26 5.3 Journey under two hours ........................................................................................................ 27 5.4 Sedation.................................................................................................................................. 27 5.5 Release from container........................................................................................................... 27 6. Walk-through enclosures ........................................................................................................ 27 7. Provisions of other Acts.......................................................................................................... 27 Appendix 1 — Specifications of materials to be used in macropod transport box construction ....... 28 Part C — Raptors ...............................................................................................................................29 General information........................................................................................................................... 29 1. Husbandry ................................................................................................................................29 1.1 Staff qualifications................................................................................................................... 29 1.2 Tethering................................................................................................................................. 29 1.3 Diet and food collection........................................................................................................... 30 1.4 Hygiene................................................................................................................................... 31 2. Facilities.................................................................................................................................... 32 2.1 General requirements ............................................................................................................. 32 2.2 Treatment facilities.................................................................................................................. 32 2.3 Inter- and intra-specific interaction (aggression reduction)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Antipredator Behaviour of Red-Necked Pademelons: a Factor Contributing to Species Survival?
    Animal Conservation (2002) 5, 325–331 © 2002 The Zoological Society of London DOI:10.1017/S1367943002004080 Printed in the United Kingdom Antipredator behaviour of red-necked pademelons: a factor contributing to species survival? Daniel T. Blumstein1,2, Janice C. Daniel1,2, Marcus R. Schnell2,3, Jodie G. Ardron2,4 and Christopher S. Evans4 1 Department of Organismic Biology, Ecology and Evolution, 621 Charles E. Young Drive South, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA 2 Cooperative Research Centre for the Conservation and Management of Marsupials, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia 3 Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia 4 Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia (Received 15 January 2002; accepted 17 June 2002) Abstract Australian mammals have one of the world’s worst records of recent extinctions. A number of stud- ies have demonstrated that red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) have a profound effect on the population biol- ogy of some species. However, not all species exposed to fox predation have declined. We studied the antipredator behaviour of a species that has not declined – the red-necked pademelon (Thylogale thetis), and contrasted it with previous studies on a species that has declined – the tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii), to try to understand behavioural factors associated with survival. We focused on two antipredator behaviours: predator recognition and the way in which antipredator vigilance is influ- enced by the presence of conspecifics. We found that predator-naïve pademelons responded to the sight of certain predators, suggesting that they had some degree of innate recognition ability.
    [Show full text]
  • Macropod Herpesviruses Dec 2013
    Herpesviruses and macropods Fact sheet Introductory statement Despite the widespread distribution of herpesviruses across a large range of macropod species there is a lack of detailed knowledge about these viruses and the effects they have on their hosts. While they have been associated with significant mortality events infections are usually benign, producing no or minimal clinical effects in their adapted hosts. With increasing emphasis being placed on captive breeding, reintroduction and translocation programs there is a greater likelihood that these viruses will be introduced into naïve macropod populations. The effects and implications of this type of viral movement are unclear. Aetiology Herpesviruses are enveloped DNA viruses that range in size from 120 to 250nm. The family Herpesviridae is divided into three subfamilies. Alphaherpesviruses have a moderately wide host range, rapid growth, lyse infected cells and have the capacity to establish latent infections primarily, but not exclusively, in nerve ganglia. Betaherpesviruses have a more restricted host range, a long replicative cycle, the capacity to cause infected cells to enlarge and the ability to form latent infections in secretory glands, lymphoreticular tissue, kidneys and other tissues. Gammaherpesviruses have a narrow host range, replicate in lymphoid cells, may induce neoplasia in infected cells and form latent infections in lymphoid tissue (Lachlan and Dubovi 2011, Roizman and Pellet 2001). There have been five herpesvirus species isolated from macropods, three alphaherpesviruses termed Macropodid Herpesvirus 1 (MaHV1), Macropodid Herpesvirus 2 (MaHV2), and Macropodid Herpesvirus 4 (MaHV4) and two gammaherpesviruses including Macropodid Herpesvirus 3 (MaHV3), and a currently unclassified novel gammaherpesvirus detected in swamp wallabies (Wallabia bicolor) (Callinan and Kefford 1981, Finnie et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Platypus Collins, L.R
    AUSTRALIAN MAMMALS BIOLOGY AND CAPTIVE MANAGEMENT Stephen Jackson © CSIRO 2003 All rights reserved. Except under the conditions described in the Australian Copyright Act 1968 and subsequent amendments, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, duplicating or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Contact CSIRO PUBLISHING for all permission requests. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Jackson, Stephen M. Australian mammals: Biology and captive management Bibliography. ISBN 0 643 06635 7. 1. Mammals – Australia. 2. Captive mammals. I. Title. 599.0994 Available from CSIRO PUBLISHING 150 Oxford Street (PO Box 1139) Collingwood VIC 3066 Australia Telephone: +61 3 9662 7666 Local call: 1300 788 000 (Australia only) Fax: +61 3 9662 7555 Email: [email protected] Web site: www.publish.csiro.au Cover photos courtesy Stephen Jackson, Esther Beaton and Nick Alexander Set in Minion and Optima Cover and text design by James Kelly Typeset by Desktop Concepts Pty Ltd Printed in Australia by Ligare REFERENCES reserved. Chapter 1 – Platypus Collins, L.R. (1973) Monotremes and Marsupials: A Reference for Zoological Institutions. Smithsonian Institution Press, rights Austin, M.A. (1997) A Practical Guide to the Successful Washington. All Handrearing of Tasmanian Marsupials. Regal Publications, Collins, G.H., Whittington, R.J. & Canfield, P.J. (1986) Melbourne. Theileria ornithorhynchi Mackerras, 1959 in the platypus, 2003. Beaven, M. (1997) Hand rearing of a juvenile platypus. Ornithorhynchus anatinus (Shaw). Journal of Wildlife Proceedings of the ASZK/ARAZPA Conference. 16–20 March.
    [Show full text]
  • Crocodylus Johnstoni
    RECORDS OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 33 103–107 (2018) DOI: 10.18195/issn.0312-3162.33(1).2018.103-107 Observations of mammalian feeding by Australian freshwater crocodiles (Crocodylus johnstoni) in the Kimberley region of Western Australia Ruchira Somaweera1,*, David Rhind2, Stephen Reynolds3, Carla Eisemberg4, Tracy Sonneman5 and David Woods5 1 Ecosystem Change Ecology, CSIRO Land & Water, Floreat, Western Australia 6014, Australia. 2 School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia. 3 Environs Kimberley, Broome, Western Australia 6725, Australia. 4 Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory 0909, Australia. 5 Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions, West Kimberley District Offce, Broome, Western Australia 6725, Australia. * Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT – The dietary preference of most crocodilians is generally thought to be fairly broad. However, the head morphology of slender-snouted crocodilians limits their ability to process large and complex prey. The slender-snouted Australian freshwater crocodile is known to be a dietary specialist consuming small aquatic prey, particularly aquatic arthropods and fsh. Here, we report observations of predation events by Australian freshwater crocodiles on medium- and large-sized mammals in the Kimberley region of Western Australia including macropods, a large rodent and an echidna. We discuss the signifcance of our observations from an ecological and morphological perspective and propose that terrestrial mammalian prey may be a seasonally important prey item for some populations of freshwater crocodiles. KEYWORDS: mammal, marsupial, monotreme, predation INTRODUCTION occupying downstream estuarine areas (Cogger 2014; Crocodilians are opportunistic predators that capture Webb et al. 1983). Given the smaller size and the mild and consume a range of prey items usually associated temperament, attacks by this species on humans are with or attracted to water.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Environmental DNA to Detect Estuarine Crocodiles, a Cryptic
    Human–Wildlife Interactions 14(1):64–72, Spring 2020 • digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi Using environmental DNA to detect estuarine crocodiles, a cryptic-ambush predator of humans Alea Rose, Research Institute for Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory 0909, Australia Yusuke Fukuda, Department of Environment & Natural Resources, Northern Territory Govern- ment, P.O. Box 496, Palmerston, Northern Territory 0831, Australia Hamish A. Campbell, Research Institute of Livelihoods and the Environment, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory 0909, Australia [email protected] Abstract: Negative human–wildlife interactions can be better managed by early detection of the wildlife species involved. However, many animals that pose a threat to humans are highly cryptic, and detecting their presence before the interaction occurs can be challenging. We describe a method whereby the presence of the estuarine crocodile (Crocodylus porosus), a cryptic and potentially dangerous predator of humans, was detected using traces of DNA shed into the water, known as environmental DNA (eDNA). The estuarine crocodile is present in waterways throughout southeast Asia and Oceania and has been responsible for >1,000 attacks upon humans in the past decade. A critical factor in the crocodile’s capability to attack humans is their ability to remain hidden in turbid waters for extended periods, ambushing humans that enter the water or undertake activities around the waterline. In northern Australia, we sampled water from aquariums where crocodiles were present or absent, and we were able to discriminate the presence of estuarine crocodile from the freshwater crocodile (C. johnstoni), a closely related sympatric species that does not pose a threat to humans.
    [Show full text]
  • East Tasmania, 2017
    South -East Tasmania - Nov / Dec 2017 The main activity on this two week trip to Tasmania was to spend a week rafting the Franklyn River, a dream of mine for 15 years. When the rafting was done I wanted to use my remaining week to visit a couple of mammal watching sites in SE Tasmania. Both Port Arthur and Melaleuca were new sites for me whilst Bruny Island I had visited earlier in the year. I try not to revisit sites but the sheer number of Eastern Quolls on Bruny was too much to resist. I used Dave Watts fabulous book “Where to see wildlife in Tasmania,” David Andrews “The complete guide to finding the mammals of Australia” and of course Jon Hall’s mammal watching website for information when planning the trip. The Rafting Trip on the Franklyn River was with the company “Water by Nature” and comes highly recommended. The only mammals seen on this part of the trip was an Echidna crossing the road on the bus journey through the central plateau to the start point on the Collingwood River and three Platypus on the Lower Franklyn. Although Quolls and Antechinus are often seen at overnight camp spots. I was too exhausted after a hard day on the river to spotlight during this part of the trip. Melaleuca – Sun 26th Mon 27th Nov. Melaleuca is an isolated site on the South Coast of Tasmania. There are no roads so the easiest way to access this remote spot is by plane. I flew with Par Avion from Cambridge Airfield, Hobart into Melaleuca and the 40 minute flight is breathtaking passing over Mt Wellington and the South West of the state before descending through the middle of the Arthur Ranges into Melaleuca.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Parasitology in Australia: Past, Present and Future
    CSIRO PUBLISHING Australian Journal of Zoology, 2018, 66, 286–305 Review https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO19017 Wildlife parasitology in Australia: past, present and future David M. Spratt A,C and Ian Beveridge B AAustralian National Wildlife Collection, National Research Collections Australia, CSIRO, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. BVeterinary Clinical Centre, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Werribee, Vic. 3030, Australia. CCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Wildlife parasitology is a highly diverse area of research encompassing many fields including taxonomy, ecology, pathology and epidemiology, and with participants from extremely disparate scientific fields. In addition, the organisms studied are highly dissimilar, ranging from platyhelminths, nematodes and acanthocephalans to insects, arachnids, crustaceans and protists. This review of the parasites of wildlife in Australia highlights the advances made to date, focussing on the work, interests and major findings of researchers over the years and identifies current significant gaps that exist in our understanding. The review is divided into three sections covering protist, helminth and arthropod parasites. The challenge to document the diversity of parasites in Australia continues at a traditional level but the advent of molecular methods has heightened the significance of this issue. Modern methods are providing an avenue for major advances in documenting and restructuring the phylogeny of protistan parasites in particular, while facilitating the recognition of species complexes in helminth taxa previously defined by traditional morphological methods. The life cycles, ecology and general biology of most parasites of wildlife in Australia are extremely poorly understood. While the phylogenetic origins of the Australian vertebrate fauna are complex, so too are the likely origins of their parasites, which do not necessarily mirror those of their hosts.
    [Show full text]
  • Ba3444 MAMMAL BOOKLET FINAL.Indd
    Intot Obliv i The disappearing native mammals of northern Australia Compiled by James Fitzsimons Sarah Legge Barry Traill John Woinarski Into Oblivion? The disappearing native mammals of northern Australia 1 SUMMARY Since European settlement, the deepest loss of Australian biodiversity has been the spate of extinctions of endemic mammals. Historically, these losses occurred mostly in inland and in temperate parts of the country, and largely between 1890 and 1950. A new wave of extinctions is now threatening Australian mammals, this time in northern Australia. Many mammal species are in sharp decline across the north, even in extensive natural areas managed primarily for conservation. The main evidence of this decline comes consistently from two contrasting sources: robust scientifi c monitoring programs and more broad-scale Indigenous knowledge. The main drivers of the mammal decline in northern Australia include inappropriate fi re regimes (too much fi re) and predation by feral cats. Cane Toads are also implicated, particularly to the recent catastrophic decline of the Northern Quoll. Furthermore, some impacts are due to vegetation changes associated with the pastoral industry. Disease could also be a factor, but to date there is little evidence for or against it. Based on current trends, many native mammals will become extinct in northern Australia in the next 10-20 years, and even the largest and most iconic national parks in northern Australia will lose native mammal species. This problem needs to be solved. The fi rst step towards a solution is to recognise the problem, and this publication seeks to alert the Australian community and decision makers to this urgent issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna of Australia 2A
    FAUNA of AUSTRALIA 39. GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND DEFINITION OF THE ORDER CROCODYLIA Harold G. Cogger 39. GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND DEFINITION OF THE ORDER CROCODYLIA Pl. 9.1. Crocodylus porosus (Crocodylidae): the salt water crocodile shows pronounced sexual dimorphism, as seen in this male (left) and female resting on the shore; this species occurs from the Kimberleys to the central east coast of Australia; see also Pls 9.2 & 9.3. [G. Grigg] Pl. 9.2. Crocodylus porosus (Crocodylidae): when feeding in the water, this species lifts the tail to counter balance the head; see also Pls 9.1 & 9.3. [G. Grigg] 2 39. GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND DEFINITION OF THE ORDER CROCODYLIA Pl. 9.3. Crocodylus porosus (Crocodylidae): the snout is broad and rounded, the teeth (well-worn in this old animal) are set in an irregular row, and a palatal flap closes the entrance to the throat; see also Pls 9.1 & 9.2. [G. Grigg] 3 39. GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND DEFINITION OF THE ORDER CROCODYLIA Pl. 9.4. Crocodylus johnstoni (Crocodylidae): the freshwater crocodile is found in rivers and billabongs from the Kimberleys to eastern Cape York; see also Pls 9.5–9.7. [G.J.W. Webb] Pl. 9.5. Crocodylus johnstoni (Crocodylidae): the freshwater crocodile inceases its apparent size by inflating its body when in a threat display; see also Pls 9.4, 9.6 & 9.7. [G.J.W. Webb] 4 39. GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND DEFINITION OF THE ORDER CROCODYLIA Pl. 9.6. Crocodylus johnstoni (Crocodylidae): the freshwater crocodile has a long, slender snout, with a regular row of nearly equal sized teeth; the eyes and slit-like ears, set high on the head, can be closed during diving; see also Pls 9.4, 9.5 & 9.7.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Scat to Estimate Body Size in Crocodilians: Case Studies of the Siamese Crocodile and American Alligator with Practical Applications
    Herpetological Conservation and Biology 15(2):325–334. Submitted: 19 December 2019; Accepted: 24 May 2020; Published: 31 August 2020. USING SCAT TO ESTIMATE BODY SIZE IN CROCODILIANS: CASE STUDIES OF THE SIAMESE CROCODILE AND AMERICAN ALLIGATOR WITH PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS STEVEN G. PLATT1, RUTH M. ELSEY2, NICHOLE D. BISHOP3, THOMAS R. RAINWATER4,8, OUDOMXAY THONGSAVATH5, DIDIER LABARRE6, AND ALEXANDER G. K. MCWILLIAM5,7 1Wildlife Conservation Society-Myanmar Program, No. 12, Nanrattaw Street, Kamayut Township, Yangon, Myanmar 2Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Rockefeller Wildlife Refuge, 5476 Grand Chenier Highway, Grand Chenier, Louisiana 70643, USA 3School of Natural Resources and Environment, Building 810, 1728 McCarthy Drive, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-0485, USA 4Tom Yawkey Wildlife Center & Belle W. Baruch Institute of Coastal Ecology and Forest Science, Clemson University, Post Office Box 596, Georgetown, South Carolina 29442, USA 5Wildlife Conservation Society-Lao Program, Post Office Box 6712, Vientiane, Laos 6Départment de Biologie, Faculté des Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, 2500 Boulevard de l’Université, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada 7Current address: International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), 63 Sukhumvit Road, Soi 39 Klongton-Nua, Bangkok, Thailand, 10110 8Corresponding author, email: [email protected] Abstract.—Models relating morphological measures to body size are of great value in crocodilian research and management. Although scat morphometrics are widely used for estimating the body size of large mammals, these relationships have not been determined for any crocodilian. To this end, we collected scats from Siamese Crocodiles (Crocodylus siamensis) and American Alligators (Alligator mississippiensis) to determine if maximum scat diameter (MSD) could be used to predict total length (TL) in these species.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Reliability of Scat Counts for Abundance and Distribution Estimations of Lumholtz’S Tree-Kangaroo (Dendrolagus Lumholtzi) in Its Rainforest Habitats
    Improving reliability of scat counts for abundance and distribution estimations of Lumholtz’s Tree-kangaroo (Dendrolagus lumholtzi) in its rainforest habitats SIGRID R. HEISE-PAVLOV1 and RHIANA D. MEADE2 Non-invasive methods are essential in the study of cryptic species. For estimations on abundances and distributions of arboreal folivores, such as Lumholtz’s Tree-kangaroo (Dendrolagus lumholtzi) in Far North Queensland, Australia, scat counts seem to be the most promising ecological technique. However, the occurrence of Lumholtz’s Tree-kangaroos in seasonal rainforests with dense understory, a high diversity of coprophagous invertebrates and with sympatric folivores increases the probability of invalidating results based on scat surveys. This study investigates scat production and scat decomposition patterns to select diagnostic traits of Lumholtz’s Tree-kangaroo scats that can, under varying environmental conditions, assist in distinguishing between fresh and old scats to reduce false positive and false negative errors in species presence due to non- or/and misidentification of scats. Scat production rates of six captive Lumholtz’s Tree-kangaroos were highly variable resulting in different scat numbers and masses. Changes in scat size (mass and circumference), pH and the appearance of mould were monitored under different laboratory conditions and in forest trials. Under wet conditions scats gained mass until they reached an apparent plateau of 130% of their original mass. Scats under dry conditions lost up to 90% of their original mass. Changes in mass were accompanied by changes in circumference of scats. By Day 3 scats had developed signs of mould under laboratory conditions and showed an acidic pH. Field trials revealed a high loss of scats due primarily to their consumption by dung beetles (Scarabaeoidea).
    [Show full text]
  • Crocodile Science
    Crocodile science How old is the crocodile? Crocodiles have been around for 200 million years, and are a descendant from the dinosaur age. What is the full taxonomic name for the saltwater crocodile? Kingdom: Animalia (Animals) Phylum: Chordata (Chordates) Class: Reptilia (Reptiles) Order: Crocodylia (Crocodiles, Alligators, Gharials and Caimans) Family: Crocodylidae (Crocodiles and Relatives) Genus: Crocodylus Species: porosus What are the physical features of the crocodile? The Australian saltwater crocodile is one of the most aggressive and dangerous crocodiles. It is also the largest living reptile, exceeding the Komodo dragon in size. Sexual dimorphism (difference) is present in this species, with the females normally growing to more than 3 metres and males normally up to 6 metres. Crocodiles up to 10 metres have been recorded in the wild in the past, but are extremely rare. Saltwater crocodiles have very large heads. A pair of ridges runs from the eyes along the centre of the snout. The eyes, ears and nostrils are located on the same plane on the top of the head, allowing it to see, hear and breathe while almost totally submerged. The eyes have a special second pair of eyelids known as the nictitating membrane. These eyelids are clear and protect the eyes while underwater. The ears, situated behind the eyes, have flaps which also close while underwater. The jaws are heavyset and contain 64-68 teeth. The teeth in the upper jaw are perfectly aligned with those in the lower jaw. The fourth tooth on each side of the bottom jaw is larger than the other teeth and is visible when the mouth is closed.
    [Show full text]