DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report 2020 2020 ANNUAL REPORT ALL AUSTRALIANS ACTIVELY CARING FOR THE LAND AND WATER THAT SUSTAINS US. It is estimated that 80% of Namadgi National Park in the ACT was burnt in the 2019/2020 Black Summer Bushfires. A volunteering event was coordinated by Landcare ACT with funding from the Landcare Australia Bushfire Recovery Grant and led by Southern ACT Catchment Group. The volunteering event was booked out within minutes of being advertised. Volunteers spent the day weeding, removing wire and star pickets as well as dividing and planting Dianella. Photo courtesy of Landcare ACT. 2020 LANDCARE AUSTRALIA ANNUAL REPORT 3 Junior Landcare Ambassador Costa Georgiadis with young Junior Landcarer’s Methnie K. and Rayhan J. Contents 6 About Landcare Australia 8 About the Landcare Movement 10 Message from the Chair 12 Message from the CEO 16 2019/2020 Highlights 30 Landcare Australia Impact 32 Landcare Australia and the UN SDGs 34 Revegetation for Threatened Species Impact 36 Landcare Farming Program Impact 38 Biodiversity Impact 40 Coastcare Impact 42 Junior Landcare Impact 44 Corporate Environmental Volunteering Impact 47 Government Partners COVER: Jill Redwood stands on her property in Goongerah, 48 Corporate Partners East Gippsland surrounded by the fire-recovering riparian zone and Manna gums along 63 In-Kind Supporters the Brodribb River. During the Black Summer bushfires, 63 Corporate Environmental Volunteering Jill was in the thick of the bushfire zone and managed to save her home, however the 64 Board and Committees surrounding forest habitat and wildlife was not so lucky. As 66 Financial Summary President and volunteer of the Goongerah Landcare Group, Jill has been working with other 70 2019 State & Territory Landcare Awards Winners landcare volunteers and the local community on projects to restore the natural habitat. BACK COVER: During Landcare Week in August 2019, Landcare ambassador Sophie Taylor- Price honoured her grandfather the late former Prime Minister the Hon. Bob Hawke AC by unveiling a Landcare interpretive sign at Wentworth in NSW, the location where he announced national expansion of the Landcare movement. 2020 LANDCARE AUSTRALIA ANNUAL REPORT 5 About Landcare Australia Landcare Australia is a national not- sustainable land management for-profit organisation established practices and environmental VISION more than 30 years ago that conservation. supports the landcare community From the coast to the country, and with funding, capacity-building, All Australians actively from urban cities to the outback, on-ground projects, information, caring for the land and landcare’s greatest asset is its networking and promotion of people. The Landcare movement is water that sustains us. landcare achievements. diverse and encompasses farmers Together with the landcare and farming systems groups, PURPOSE community, our efforts improve landowners, landcare groups and biodiversity, build resilience in networks, Traditional Owners, • Empowering Australia’s food and farming Bushcare and ‘Friends of’ groups, individuals and systems, and create stronger Coastcare, Dunecare and Rivercare groups, landcare facilitators and communities communities. As a leader in the environmental sector, coordinators, youth groups and • Sustainable Landcare Australia has strong other community groups involved expertise in designing, managing in protecting, enhancing or management and completing challenging restoring their local environment. of natural and and complex major ecological The Junior Landcare program productive restoration projects involving large provides a pathway for children to scale revegetation and carbon landscapes become lifelong landcarers starting abatement. with early learning childhood • Building resilient Established in 1989 by the late centres through to primary and ecosystems and former Prime Minister, the Hon. secondary schools. Bob Hawke AC, Landcare Australia communities. Since 1989, Landcare Australia has supports over 6,000 groups and worked collaboratively with federal, 140,000+ volunteers with landcare state and local governments projects that are focused on and their agencies, the National 6 2020 LANDCARE AUSTRALIA ANNUAL REPORT Landcare Network and the • support the adoption of of positive environmental and Landcare peak bodies, corporate sustainable agriculture community outcomes, these include: and philanthropic partners, practices that will deliver a • a sustainable approach to sponsors, community groups and more productive and profitable integrated land management individuals to support the landcare agriculture industry. • environmental protection, community. This long-standing For over 30 years, Landcare enhancement and conservation of engagement with local community- Australia has worked at the land, water, waterways and coasts led environmental initiatives forefront of community and • natural habitat restoration to has led to the organisation’s corporate engagement in natural enhance biodiversity renowned reputation and trust by resource management and • building resilience in Australia’s Australians. environmental project delivery. food and farming systems Landcare Australia develops Custodian of the ‘caring hands’ • creating social cohesion and campaigns in partnership with logo, Landcare Australia manages wellbeing in communities. stakeholders to: the Landcare, Coastcare, Junior With the impact of a changing • support the sharing of Landcare and Landcare Farming climate, and natural disasters knowledge and promote the brands on behalf of the landcare like drought, bushfires and flood, development of community movement. The Landcare brand landcare has never been so leadership and resilience; is recognised and trusted, with important. • recognise and celebrate the consistently positive attitudes in achievements of the landcare local communities towards landcare What makes Landcare Australia community; projects, and 78% awareness unique to any other national • encourage participation in among Australians of the landcare environmental organisation is landcare activities and the ‘caring hands’ logo. effective partnerships and people. recruitment and retention of The funding and in-kind Across Australia, our partnerships volunteers; contributions raised from support thousands of people • attract government, corporate partnerships and sponsors involved in Landcare who are and philanthropic funding and supports Landcare Australia volunteering to protect local in-kind support for good quality, to develop programs that ecosystems that contribute to the hands on projects and programs are practical, deliverable and sustainability and productivity of our that will improve environmental community focused. land and water assets for the benefit outcomes; and of all Australians. Through this support, Landcare Australia achieves a diverse range 2020 LANDCARE AUSTRALIA ANNUAL REPORT 7 About the Landcare Movement “The degradation of our Landcare evolved in Victoria with Rick Farley of the National environment is not simply through an initiative of Joan Kirner, Farmers Federation (NFF), and (then Minister for Conservation, Phillip Toyne of the Australian a local problem, nor a Forests and Lands) and Heather Conservation Foundation (ACF), problem for one state Mitchell, (then President of the successfully encouraging the or another, nor for the Victorian Farmers Federation). Hawke Government to commit to supporting the emerging With the generous support of Commonwealth alone. movement. community members, farmers and Rather, the damage being Victorian departmental officers, Landcare became a national done to our environment is Heather Mitchell and Joan Kirner programme on 20 July, 1989 a problem for us all – and were able to launch ‘Landcare’ in in Wentworth NSW, when the a small town in central Victoria in Australian Government with not just government- but November 1986. bipartisan support, announced for of us individually and its “Decade of Landcare Plan” and Many Australian communities had committed $320 million to fund the together.” already begun practising ‘Landcare’ National Landcare Programme. decades earlier; accounts from The former Australian some of our most enduring 1989 was also the year that the Prime Minister the Landcare groups show grass roots national not-for-profit organisation Hon. Bob Hawke AC environmental issues being tackled Landcare Australia was established. as early as the 1950s. The national formation of the In January 1988, Australia’s first Landcare movement brought official Dunecare groups formed farmers and conservationists on the New South Wales Mid North together to resolve environmental Coast at Hat Head, Diamond Beach, issues. In his speech to launch Scotts Head and Diggers Beach. Landcare, former Prime Minister Bob Hawke AC spoke about the In 1989, the national Landcare importance of co-operation to care movement was officially recognised for the land. 8 2020 LANDCARE AUSTRALIA ANNUAL REPORT Over the last 30+ years, Landcare and community. These partnerships has evolved to become one of the build local community ownership largest volunteer movements in of issues, unlock volunteer Landcare is about Australia. There are thousands knowledge, capability and capacity of people and countless to create better outcomes for the working together caring communities working together environment and those that seek to for the land to preserve towards sustainable land use and protect and enhance it. our natural resources undertaking on-ground action to In the last three decades landcare protect, enhance or
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Antipredator Behaviour of Red-Necked Pademelons: a Factor Contributing to Species Survival?
    Animal Conservation (2002) 5, 325–331 © 2002 The Zoological Society of London DOI:10.1017/S1367943002004080 Printed in the United Kingdom Antipredator behaviour of red-necked pademelons: a factor contributing to species survival? Daniel T. Blumstein1,2, Janice C. Daniel1,2, Marcus R. Schnell2,3, Jodie G. Ardron2,4 and Christopher S. Evans4 1 Department of Organismic Biology, Ecology and Evolution, 621 Charles E. Young Drive South, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA 2 Cooperative Research Centre for the Conservation and Management of Marsupials, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia 3 Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia 4 Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia (Received 15 January 2002; accepted 17 June 2002) Abstract Australian mammals have one of the world’s worst records of recent extinctions. A number of stud- ies have demonstrated that red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) have a profound effect on the population biol- ogy of some species. However, not all species exposed to fox predation have declined. We studied the antipredator behaviour of a species that has not declined – the red-necked pademelon (Thylogale thetis), and contrasted it with previous studies on a species that has declined – the tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii), to try to understand behavioural factors associated with survival. We focused on two antipredator behaviours: predator recognition and the way in which antipredator vigilance is influ- enced by the presence of conspecifics. We found that predator-naïve pademelons responded to the sight of certain predators, suggesting that they had some degree of innate recognition ability.
    [Show full text]
  • Macropod Herpesviruses Dec 2013
    Herpesviruses and macropods Fact sheet Introductory statement Despite the widespread distribution of herpesviruses across a large range of macropod species there is a lack of detailed knowledge about these viruses and the effects they have on their hosts. While they have been associated with significant mortality events infections are usually benign, producing no or minimal clinical effects in their adapted hosts. With increasing emphasis being placed on captive breeding, reintroduction and translocation programs there is a greater likelihood that these viruses will be introduced into naïve macropod populations. The effects and implications of this type of viral movement are unclear. Aetiology Herpesviruses are enveloped DNA viruses that range in size from 120 to 250nm. The family Herpesviridae is divided into three subfamilies. Alphaherpesviruses have a moderately wide host range, rapid growth, lyse infected cells and have the capacity to establish latent infections primarily, but not exclusively, in nerve ganglia. Betaherpesviruses have a more restricted host range, a long replicative cycle, the capacity to cause infected cells to enlarge and the ability to form latent infections in secretory glands, lymphoreticular tissue, kidneys and other tissues. Gammaherpesviruses have a narrow host range, replicate in lymphoid cells, may induce neoplasia in infected cells and form latent infections in lymphoid tissue (Lachlan and Dubovi 2011, Roizman and Pellet 2001). There have been five herpesvirus species isolated from macropods, three alphaherpesviruses termed Macropodid Herpesvirus 1 (MaHV1), Macropodid Herpesvirus 2 (MaHV2), and Macropodid Herpesvirus 4 (MaHV4) and two gammaherpesviruses including Macropodid Herpesvirus 3 (MaHV3), and a currently unclassified novel gammaherpesvirus detected in swamp wallabies (Wallabia bicolor) (Callinan and Kefford 1981, Finnie et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Pdf Version
    LANDCARE IN FOCUS 2017 ANNUAL SPECIAL PUBLICATION FARMING INNOVATION AND BEST PRACTICE LAND MANAGEMENT 2 Fairfax Media Special Publication Innovation the key to productivity BY LUKE HARTSUYKER information at the fi eld, managers can make the As a result of RD and E ASSISTANT TO THE DEPUTY paddock or block level to most of the opportunities by the Cotton Research and PRIME MINISTER help optimise and minimise presented by the digital age Development Corporation, inputs such as water, and new technologies. Australia’s cotton industry fertilisers and pesticides. Th at is why, in has adopted innovative THIS is an exciting time for Th is can help ensure that partnership with industry, water use effi ciency inputs are used effi ciently, we invest heavily in rural improvements including in- farming. and allows for targeted Innovative use of new research and development, fi eld moisture monitoring, management of issues such to support the kind of fi eld and irrigation system technologies, including as nitrogen pollution and digital technology and innovation that keeps our design, scheduling soil fertility. soils, water and vegetation technology, soil health robotics, has the potential Precision agriculture can to transform our farm healthy, productive and improvements and other further support sustainable sustainable. irrigation techniques. businesses and land land management by management practices. For example, Horticulture Over the past 10 years, providing information that Innovation Australia has these innovations have We all know that allows
    [Show full text]
  • East Tasmania, 2017
    South -East Tasmania - Nov / Dec 2017 The main activity on this two week trip to Tasmania was to spend a week rafting the Franklyn River, a dream of mine for 15 years. When the rafting was done I wanted to use my remaining week to visit a couple of mammal watching sites in SE Tasmania. Both Port Arthur and Melaleuca were new sites for me whilst Bruny Island I had visited earlier in the year. I try not to revisit sites but the sheer number of Eastern Quolls on Bruny was too much to resist. I used Dave Watts fabulous book “Where to see wildlife in Tasmania,” David Andrews “The complete guide to finding the mammals of Australia” and of course Jon Hall’s mammal watching website for information when planning the trip. The Rafting Trip on the Franklyn River was with the company “Water by Nature” and comes highly recommended. The only mammals seen on this part of the trip was an Echidna crossing the road on the bus journey through the central plateau to the start point on the Collingwood River and three Platypus on the Lower Franklyn. Although Quolls and Antechinus are often seen at overnight camp spots. I was too exhausted after a hard day on the river to spotlight during this part of the trip. Melaleuca – Sun 26th Mon 27th Nov. Melaleuca is an isolated site on the South Coast of Tasmania. There are no roads so the easiest way to access this remote spot is by plane. I flew with Par Avion from Cambridge Airfield, Hobart into Melaleuca and the 40 minute flight is breathtaking passing over Mt Wellington and the South West of the state before descending through the middle of the Arthur Ranges into Melaleuca.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Parasitology in Australia: Past, Present and Future
    CSIRO PUBLISHING Australian Journal of Zoology, 2018, 66, 286–305 Review https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO19017 Wildlife parasitology in Australia: past, present and future David M. Spratt A,C and Ian Beveridge B AAustralian National Wildlife Collection, National Research Collections Australia, CSIRO, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. BVeterinary Clinical Centre, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Werribee, Vic. 3030, Australia. CCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Wildlife parasitology is a highly diverse area of research encompassing many fields including taxonomy, ecology, pathology and epidemiology, and with participants from extremely disparate scientific fields. In addition, the organisms studied are highly dissimilar, ranging from platyhelminths, nematodes and acanthocephalans to insects, arachnids, crustaceans and protists. This review of the parasites of wildlife in Australia highlights the advances made to date, focussing on the work, interests and major findings of researchers over the years and identifies current significant gaps that exist in our understanding. The review is divided into three sections covering protist, helminth and arthropod parasites. The challenge to document the diversity of parasites in Australia continues at a traditional level but the advent of molecular methods has heightened the significance of this issue. Modern methods are providing an avenue for major advances in documenting and restructuring the phylogeny of protistan parasites in particular, while facilitating the recognition of species complexes in helminth taxa previously defined by traditional morphological methods. The life cycles, ecology and general biology of most parasites of wildlife in Australia are extremely poorly understood. While the phylogenetic origins of the Australian vertebrate fauna are complex, so too are the likely origins of their parasites, which do not necessarily mirror those of their hosts.
    [Show full text]
  • Ba3444 MAMMAL BOOKLET FINAL.Indd
    Intot Obliv i The disappearing native mammals of northern Australia Compiled by James Fitzsimons Sarah Legge Barry Traill John Woinarski Into Oblivion? The disappearing native mammals of northern Australia 1 SUMMARY Since European settlement, the deepest loss of Australian biodiversity has been the spate of extinctions of endemic mammals. Historically, these losses occurred mostly in inland and in temperate parts of the country, and largely between 1890 and 1950. A new wave of extinctions is now threatening Australian mammals, this time in northern Australia. Many mammal species are in sharp decline across the north, even in extensive natural areas managed primarily for conservation. The main evidence of this decline comes consistently from two contrasting sources: robust scientifi c monitoring programs and more broad-scale Indigenous knowledge. The main drivers of the mammal decline in northern Australia include inappropriate fi re regimes (too much fi re) and predation by feral cats. Cane Toads are also implicated, particularly to the recent catastrophic decline of the Northern Quoll. Furthermore, some impacts are due to vegetation changes associated with the pastoral industry. Disease could also be a factor, but to date there is little evidence for or against it. Based on current trends, many native mammals will become extinct in northern Australia in the next 10-20 years, and even the largest and most iconic national parks in northern Australia will lose native mammal species. This problem needs to be solved. The fi rst step towards a solution is to recognise the problem, and this publication seeks to alert the Australian community and decision makers to this urgent issue.
    [Show full text]
  • National Landcare Network Ltd 2019 Annual Report
    NATIONAL LANDCARE NETWORK LTD ABN: 40 612 363 121 2019 ANNUAL REPORT 1 MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR I am delighted to have taken up the role of chair of the NLN this year when Peter Bridgewater stepped down after a period of dedicated and productive service. I want to thank Peter for his work in leading the Board of the NLN and for the healthy financial and strategic position the NLN is in at the end of 2019. I take up this position as a relatively new participant in the governance of Community Landcare but with a lifetime of participation in landcare and nature conservation activities. I have worked in the government, private and not-for-profit sectors and maintain a research position in environmental science and economics. My experience shows me that collaboration and cooperation are essential to fulfilling the mission of Community Landcare and I approach the role with that in mind. The achievements of the NLN which are listed in this document are a result of collaboration and cooperation with many stakeholders and are a testament to the combined strength in the Landcare movement. Some of the important things to note at this stage of development of the NLN are that the organisation is well administered and financially sound. From that position NLN has been undertaking work to invigorate Community Landcare and is making progress on important direction setting documents including a new Strategic Plan and a literature review and value proposition to underpin future positioning. It is important for Landcare to be at the table in discussions of how government and other stakeholders plan to tackle issues affecting Australia’s agriculture and natural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Native Vegetation and Biodiversity Regulations, Report No
    Impacts of Native Vegetation Productivity and Biodiversity Commission Regulations Inquiry Report No. 29, 8 April 2004 © Commonwealth of Australia 2004 ISSN 1447-1329 ISBN 1-74037-145-3 This work is subject to copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, the work may be reproduced in whole or in part for study or training purposes, subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source. Reproduction for commercial use or sale requires prior written permission from the Department of Communications, IT and the Arts. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Intellectual Property Branch, Department of Communications, IT and the Arts, GPO Box 2154, Canberra ACT 2601. This publication is available in hard copy or PDF format from the Productivity Commission website at www.pc.gov.au. If you require part or all of this publication in a different format, please contact Media and Publications (see below). Publications Inquiries: Media and Publications Productivity Commission Locked Bag 2 Collins Street East Melbourne VIC 8003 Tel: (03) 9653 2244 Fax: (03) 9653 2303 Email: [email protected] General Inquiries: Tel: (03) 9653 2100 or (02) 6240 3200 An appropriate citation for this paper is: Productivity Commission 2004, Impacts of Native Vegetation and Biodiversity Regulations, Report no. 29, Melbourne. JEL code: Q, R The Productivity Commission The Productivity Commission, an independent agency, is the Australian Government’s principal review and advisory body on microeconomic policy and regulation. It conducts public inquiries and research into a broad range of economic and social issues affecting the welfare of Australians.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Reliability of Scat Counts for Abundance and Distribution Estimations of Lumholtz’S Tree-Kangaroo (Dendrolagus Lumholtzi) in Its Rainforest Habitats
    Improving reliability of scat counts for abundance and distribution estimations of Lumholtz’s Tree-kangaroo (Dendrolagus lumholtzi) in its rainforest habitats SIGRID R. HEISE-PAVLOV1 and RHIANA D. MEADE2 Non-invasive methods are essential in the study of cryptic species. For estimations on abundances and distributions of arboreal folivores, such as Lumholtz’s Tree-kangaroo (Dendrolagus lumholtzi) in Far North Queensland, Australia, scat counts seem to be the most promising ecological technique. However, the occurrence of Lumholtz’s Tree-kangaroos in seasonal rainforests with dense understory, a high diversity of coprophagous invertebrates and with sympatric folivores increases the probability of invalidating results based on scat surveys. This study investigates scat production and scat decomposition patterns to select diagnostic traits of Lumholtz’s Tree-kangaroo scats that can, under varying environmental conditions, assist in distinguishing between fresh and old scats to reduce false positive and false negative errors in species presence due to non- or/and misidentification of scats. Scat production rates of six captive Lumholtz’s Tree-kangaroos were highly variable resulting in different scat numbers and masses. Changes in scat size (mass and circumference), pH and the appearance of mould were monitored under different laboratory conditions and in forest trials. Under wet conditions scats gained mass until they reached an apparent plateau of 130% of their original mass. Scats under dry conditions lost up to 90% of their original mass. Changes in mass were accompanied by changes in circumference of scats. By Day 3 scats had developed signs of mould under laboratory conditions and showed an acidic pH. Field trials revealed a high loss of scats due primarily to their consumption by dung beetles (Scarabaeoidea).
    [Show full text]
  • Landcare Local Government Award CONTENTS
    victorian andcarandcaree LLIIss ss uu ee 88 WW iinn tt ee rr 1199 99 88 AddictedAddicted toto deerdeer AnAn endend toto thethe blueblue lagoonlagoon LaunchLaunch ofof futurefuture harvestharvest Congratulations to the Shire of Campaspe Winner National Landcare Local Government Award CONTENTS Editorial Business Management Wade Hughes Page 5 Wally Shaw Peter Sutherland Mining Week Editorial Group Page 7 Paul Crock (03) 9207 5555 Mal Brown (03) 9412 4382 Sally Gibson (03) 9412 5048 Communicating over Phil Roberts (03) 9207 5555 the catchment Editorial Consultant Page 9 Tiffany & Associates (03) 9894 2169 An end to the blue lagoon Advertising Manager Page 14 Paul Crock Phone (03) 9207 5562, Fax (03) 9207 5500 Design Addicted to Deer Bouquet Productions Pty. Ltd. Page 16 Phone (03) 9376 0911, Fax (03) 9376 0922 Premier launches Future Harvest Printing Page 22 Henry Thacker Print Group Breakwater, Geelong. Phone (03) 5248 3333, Fax (03) 5248 7222 Catch-up around the CMA’s Cover Photograph Page 24 A winter scene - Andrew Chapman New Zealand Landcare Trust Contributions and mailing list enquiries Page 28 Victorian Farmers Federation Landcare Section, Level 6 24-28 Collins St, Melbourne 3000 The Victorian Landcare Magazine is a joint publication of the Victorian Phone (03) 9207 5555 Fax (03) 9207 5500 Farmers Federation, Alcoa of Australia Limited and the Department of Natural E-mail: [email protected] Resources and Environment, with the support of the Catchment and Land Victorian Landcare is published for the Victorian Protection Council and Greening Australia Victoria. Landcare Community by the Victorian Farmers Federation, 24-28 Collins Street, Melbourne 3000.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Release
    MEDIA RELEASE Large scale funding from Federal Government to support local bushfire recovery projects in regions impacted by Black Summer bushfires 26.05.2021 Eligible local Landcare groups, environment networks and community groups working on bushfire recovery projects can now access funding of approximately $50,000 in a landmark new grants program funded by the Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment. Recently announced by Federal Environment Minister Sussan Ley, the $14 million Landcare Led Bushfire Recovery Grants program is supporting recovery projects in seven government designated regions impacted by the Black Summer bushfires in Queensland, New South Wales, the Australian Capital Territory, Victoria and South Australia. The designated areas include: rainforests of South-East Queensland and NSW North Coast and Tablelands, NSW Greater Blue Mountains and World Heritage area, forests of the NSW South Coast, alpine environments across ACT, NSW and Victoria, forests and coastal ecosystems of East Gippsland and South Australia’s Kangaroo Island. In addition to funding of approximately $50,000, landscape-scale partnerships working together on bushfire recovery projects can also access funding of approximately $300,000. An additional $4million is targeted for projects benefitting forests and coastal ecosystems in the East Gippsland bushfire impacted region, with major projects eligible for funding of approximately $500,000 to $1million each, says National Landcare Network Chief Executive Officer, Jim Adams. Mr Adams said that the $14million bushfire grants program will be delivered by a ground-breaking alliance between the National Landcare Network, the Landcare peak bodies in Queensland, New South Wales, the Australian Capital Territory, Victoria and South Australia, together with Landcare Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Skulls of Tasmania
    SKULLS of the MAMMALS inTASMANIA R.H.GREEN with illustrations by 1. L. RAINBIRIJ An Illustrated Key to the Skulls of the Mammals in Tasmania by R. H. GREEN with illustrations by J. L. RAINBIRD Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery, Launceston, Tasmania Published by Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia 1983 © Printed by Foot and Playsted Pty. Ltd., Launceston ISBN a 7246 1127 4 2 CONTENTS Page Introduction . 4 Acknowledgements.......................... 5 Types of teeth........................................................................................... 6 The illustrations........................................ 7 Skull of a carnivore showing polyprotodont dentition 8 Skull of a herbivore showing diprotodont dentition......................................... 9 Families of monotremes TACHYGLOSSIDAE - Echidna 10 ORNITHORHYNCHIDAE - Platypus 12 Families of marsupials DASYURIDAE - Quolls, devil, antechinuses, dunnart 14 THYLACINIDAE - Thylacine 22 PERAMELIDAE - Bandicoots 24 PHALANGERIDAE - Brushtail Possum 28 BURRAMYIDAE - Pygmy-possums 30 PETAURIDAE - Sugar glider, ringtail 34 MACROPODIDAE - Bettong, potoroo, pademelon, wallaby, kangaroo 38 VOMBATIDAE - Wombat 44 Families of eutherians VESPERTILIONIDAE - Bats 46 MURIDAE - Rats, mice 56 CANIDAE - Dog 66 FELIDAE - Cat 68 EQUIDAE - Horse 70 BOVIDAE - Cattle, goat, sheep 72 CERVIDAE - Deer 76 SUIDAE - Pig 78 LEPORIDAE - Hare, rabbit 80 OTARIIDAE - Sea-lion, fur-seals 84 PHOCIDAE - Seals 88 HOMINIDAE - Man 92 Appendix I Dichotomous key 94 Appendix II Index to skull illustrations . ........... 96 Alphabetical index of common names . ........................................... 98 Alphabetical index of scientific names 99 3 INTRODUCTION The skulls of mammals are often brought to museums for indentification. The enquirers may be familiar with the live animal but they are often quite confused when confronted with the task of identifying a skull or, worse, only part of a skull. Skulls may be found in the bush with, or apart from, the rest of the skeleton.
    [Show full text]