Hydrocarbon Exploration and Production Activities
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Oct Nov 2006
Dams, Rivers & People VOL 4 ISSUE 9-10 OCT-NOV 2006 Rs 15/- Lead Piece Climate Change is Here – when will we wake up? There is increasing evidence that shows that Another recent report, titled Feeling the Heat from the ? climate change is already here. It is already Christian development agency Tearfund predicts that affecting the rainfall, floods, droughts, sea- Climate change threatens supplies of water for millions levels, land erosion and so on. of people in poorer countries. By 2050, five times as much land is likely to be under "extreme" drought as The frequency of extreme weather incidents is clearly now. "It's the extremes of water which are going to increasing, the unprecedented floods in Mumbai and provide the biggest threat to the developing world from Gujarat in 2005 and 2006, the unprecedented floods in climate change… droughts will tend to be longer, and Barmer this year the unusual rainfall deficit in Bihar and that's very bad news. Extreme droughts currently cover Assam this year are only a few of the recent incidents. about 2% of the world's land area, and that is going to 2005 has already been declared the warmest year in spread to about 10% by 2050." it said. The positive side recent times. of the Tearfund report is that simple measures to A recent study at the School of Oceanographic Studies "climate-proof" water problems, both drought and flood, of Jadavpur University (The Hindustan Times 011106) have proven to be very effective in some areas. In Niger, says that 70 000 people would be affected in the eastern the charity says that building low, stone dykes across and western part of the Suderbans due to rising sea contours has helped prevent runoff and get more water levels. -
1 Issues Pertaining to Peninsular Rivers Wing Interstate Matters: (A) Mullaperiyar Dam Issue 1. on 29-10-1886, a Lease In
Issues pertaining to Peninsular Rivers wing i. Interstate matters: (a) Mullaperiyar Dam Issue 1. On 29‐10‐1886, a lease indenture for 999 years was made between Maharaja of Travancore and Secretary of State for India for Periyar irrigation works. By another agreement in 1970, Tamil Nadu was permitted to generate power also. The Mullaperiyar Dam was constructed during 1887‐1895. Its full reservoir level is 152 ft and it provides water through a tunnel to Vaigai basin in Tamil Nadu for irrigation benefits in 68558 ha area. 2. In 1979, reports appeared in Kerala Press about damage to Periyar Dam. On 25th November, 1979 Chairman, CWC held meeting with the officers of Irrigation and Electricity, Deptt. of Kerala and PWD of Tamil Nadu and some emergency medium term measures and long‐term measures for strengthening of Periyar Dam were decided. A second meeting under the Chairmanship of Chairman, CWC was held on 29th April 1980 and it was opined that after the completion of emergency and medium term measures, the water level in the reservoir can be raised up to 145 ft. 3. The matter became sub‐judice with several petitions. On the directions of the Supreme Court in its order dated 28.4.2000, Minister (WR) convened the Inter‐State meeting on 19.5.2000 and as decided in the meeting, an Expert Committee under Member (D&R), CWC with representatives from both States was constituted in June 2000 to study the safety of the dam. The Committee in its report of March, 2001 opined that with the strengthening measures implemented, the water level can be raised from 136 ft. -
WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Evaluating the Benefits and Costs of Developmental Interventions in the Water Sector in Andhra Pradesh
WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Evaluating the Benefits and Costs of Developmental Interventions in the Water Sector in Andhra Pradesh Cost-Benefit Analysis Dr. Dinesh AUTHORS: Kumar Executive Director Institute for Resource Analysis and Policy (IRAP), Hyderabad © 2018 Copenhagen Consensus Center [email protected] www.copenhagenconsensus.com This work has been produced as a part of the Andhra Pradesh Priorities project under the larger, India Consensus project. This project is undertaken in partnership with Tata Trusts. Some rights reserved This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). Under the Creative Commons Attribution license, you are free to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt this work, including for commercial purposes, under the following conditions: Attribution Please cite the work as follows: #AUTHOR NAME#, #PAPER TITLE#, Andhra Pradesh Priorities, Copenhagen Consensus Center, 2017. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0. Third-party-content Copenhagen Consensus Center does not necessarily own each component of the content contained within the work. If you wish to re-use a component of the work, it is your responsibility to determine whether permission is needed for that re-use and to obtain permission from the copyright owner. Examples of components can include, but are not limited to, tables, figures, or images. Evaluating the Benefits and Costs of Developmental Interventions in the Water Sector Andhra Pradesh Priorities An India Consensus Prioritization -
Need to Ensure Adequate Availability of Water in Palar River in Tamil Nadu and Also Expedite Pennayar - Palar Link Canal Project
an> Title: Need to ensure adequate availability of water in Palar River in Tamil Nadu and also expedite Pennayar - Palar Link Canal Project. SHRI B. SENGUTTUVAN (VELLORE): River Palar, an inter-State river, originating in Karnataka, runs to a distance of 53 kms in Karnataka, 30 kms in Andhra Pradesh and 222 kms in Tamil Nadu. The river is covered under Schedule-A of the Madras-Mysore Agreement. As per Clause II of Agreement upstream State cannot construct any dam or reservoir without consent of the downstream State. During the monsoons, where adequate rainfall is received, the waters of the river replenish more than one thousand tanks, ponds and lakes on either side of its banks, which are the sources of water of drinking and irrigation in Vellore and Kancheepuram Districts. The Palar ayacut supports cultivation of roughly 4.2 lakh acres of lands. However, due to the construction of Check-dams across the river by neighbouring States of Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh, the water flow in the river has completely ceased leaving the land patched, dry and drought-stricken. To compound the problems, the Andhra Pradesh Government is raising the height of check dam in Perumpallam village on the very border of Tamil Nadu State to a height of 12 feet and more with a view to converting it into a reservoir. This would seriously impede water flow in the Palar and deprive Tamil Nadu of the much needed Palar water. In order to protect the ayacutdars, the inter-state Palar River has to be nationalised removing all dams and barriers constructed across it and the 52 km long Pennayar-Palar Link Canal Project has to be implemented expeditiously. -
Pre-Feasibility Report Proposed Ajansara Barrage Project for Lift
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT PROPOSED AJANSARA BARRAGE PROJECT M/s. Vidharbha FOR LIFT IRRIGATION CAPACITY:TOTAL 30004 CCA Irrigation Development at Village Ajansara, Taluka Hinganghat, District Wardha, Maharashtra Corporation (VIDC) STUDY PERIOD PROPOSED AJANSARA BARRAGE PROJECT FOR LIFT IRRIGATION FOR TOTAL 30004 CCA AND 24000 ICA AT VILLAGE AJANSARA, TALUKA HINGANGHAT, DISTRICT WARDHA, MS INDEX BY M/S. VIDHARBHA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (VIDC) INDEX Sr. No. Particular Page No. 1 Executive Summary 1 2 INTRODUCTION OF THE PROJECT/ BACKGROUND 6 INFORMATION 2.1 Identification of project 6 2.2 Brief History of nature of the project 7 2.3 Need for the project and its importance to the country and 7 region 2.4 Benefit of Project 9 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 10 3.1 Type of project including interlinked and interdependent 10 projects, if any 3.2 Regulatory Frame Work 10 3.3 Location (map showing general location, specific location, 11 and project boundary & project site layout) with coordinates 3.4 Details of alternate sites considered and the basis of 21 selecting the proposed site, particularly the environmental considerations gone into should be highlighted 3.5 Size or magnitude of operation 21 3.6 Project description with process details (a schematic 21 diagram/ flow chart showing the project layout, components of the project etc. 3.6.1 Design Feature of Head Work 21 3.6.2 Rolled Filled Earth Dam 22 3.6.3 Barrage 23 3.6.4 Design of Barrage 23 3.6.5 Foundation of Barrage 23 4 IRRIGATION PLANNING 24 4.1 Existing and Proposed Facilities in Command Area 24 4.2 Existing and Proposed Cropping Patterns 24 4.3 Soil Survey 24 4.4 Evaporation Losses 25 5 SURVEY AND INVESTIGATION 25 5.1 Topographical Survey & Investigation 25 5.2 Survey for Barrage 25 5.3 Submergence Survey 25 5.4 Canal and Command Area Survey 25 5.5 Survey for Construction Material 25 5.6 Geotechnical Investigation 26 6 PROJECT HYDROLOGY 26 6.1 General Climate and Hydrology 26 6.2 Hydrological Data 27 6.2.1 Catchment Area 27 SMS Envocare Ltd. -
Water Demand Management in Areas of Groundwater Over-Exploitation
ENGINEERING KNOWLEDGE AND RESEARCH PROGRAMME (KaR 8332) Water demand management in areas of groundwater over-exploitation WATER DEMAND MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FORMULATION FINAL REPORT FEBRUARY 2006 in association with VRV Consultants (P) Ltd, Chennai, India Jouzy & Partners, Amman, Jordan DFID R8332 Water demand management in areas of groundwater over-exploitation WATER DEMAND MANAGEMENT - STRATEGY FORMULATION FINAL REPORT - February 2006 __________________________________________________________________________ Contents MAIN REPORT Page No. PREFACE 1 S. SUMMARY 3 1. INTRODUCTION 7 1.1 Purpose of the Report 7 1.2 International perspective 9 1.3 Water sector strategies 11 2. WATER DEMAND MANAGEMENT 15 2.1 Definition 15 2.2 Potential measures 15 2.2.1 Previous studies 15 2.2.2 Broad categories of water demand management measures 17 2.3 Potential impacts 19 3. THE POOR AND VULNERABLE 21 3.1 Water, poverty and vulnerability 21 3.1.1 The sustainable livelihoods approach 21 3.1.2 Water-Poverty links 23 3.1.3 Vulnerability assessment 24 4. STRATEGY FORMULATION 27 4.1 General 27 4.1.1 Policy review 27 4.1.2 Strategy formulation 28 4.2 Institutional and community aspects 31 4.3 Poor and vulnerable identified 34 4.4 Data requirements 35 4.5 Water demand management options defined 37 4.6 Enabling and supporting measures 40 4.7 Water savings and unit cost of water saved 41 4.7.1 General 41 4.7.2 Financial and economic aspects 42 4.8 Impact of demand management measures 43 01 June 2006 i DFID R8332 Water demand management in areas of groundwater over-exploitation WATER DEMAND MANAGEMENT - STRATEGY FORMULATION FINAL REPORT - February 2006 __________________________________________________________________________ 4.9 Comparison of measures and their likelihood of success 45 4.9.1 Impact of measures 45 4.9.2 Pre-conditions and likelihood of success 46 5. -
Techofworld.In Techofworld.In
Techofworld.In Techofworld.In Indira Sagar Dam of Madhya Pradesh has been constructed on which river? 1.Penna river 2.Krishna river 3.Narmada river 4.Palar river 5.None of these Answer Answer –3.Narmada river Rihand Dam has been constructed on Rihand river in which Indian state? 1.Tamil Nadu 2.Karnataka 3.Andhra Pradesh 4.Uttar Pradesh 5.None of these Answer Answer – 4.Uttar Pradesh In which stated the Sardar Sarovar Dam has been constructed on Narmada river? 1.Tamil Nadu 2.Madhya Pradesh 3.Andhra Pradesh 4.Uttar Pradesh 5.None of these Answer Answer – 5.None of these – Gujarat Ukai Dam located in Gujarat has been constructed on which river? 1.Tapi river 2.Penna river 3.Narmada river 4.Karjan river 5.None of these Answer Answer – 1.Tapi river Techofworld.In Techofworld.In Nagarjuna Sagar Dam in Andhra Pradesh is built on which river? 1.Periyar river 2.Penna river 3.Narmada river 4.Krishna river 5.None of these Answer Answer – 4.Krishna river Pong Dam of Himachal Pradesh has been constructed on which river? 1.Beas river 2.Tapi river 3.Gola river 4.Subansiri river 5.None of these Answer Answer – 1.Beas river Srisailam dam on Krishna river is located in which state? 1.Tamil Nadu 2.Karnataka 3.Madhya Pradesh 4.Gujarat 5.None of these Answer Answer – 5.None of these – Andhra Pradesh Supa Dam on Kali Nadi river is located in_________. 1.Himachal Pradesh 2.Arunachal Pradesh 3.Punjab 4.Karnataka 5.None of these Answer Answer – 4.Karnataka Techofworld.In Techofworld.In Tehri Dam of Uttarakhand is built on which river? 1.Bhagirathi river 2.Tapi -
Are You Suprised ?
Chapter 2 Physical features 2.1 Geographical Disposition The Pennar (Somasila) – Palar - Cauvery (Grand Anicut) link canal off takes from the existing Somasila reservoir located across the Pennar River near Somasila village in Nellore district of Andhra Pradesh state. The link canal is proposed to pass through the Kaluvaya, Rapur, Dakkili, Venkatagiri mandals of Nellore district; Srikalahasti, Thottambedu, Pitchattur and Nagari mandals of Chittoor district of Andhra Pradesh state, Tiruttani taluk of Tiruvallur district; Arakonam taluk of Vellore district; Cheyyar and Vandavasi taluks of Tiruvannamalai district; Kancheepuram, Uthiramerur taluks of Kancheepuram district; Tindivanam, Gingee, Villupuram, Tirukoilur taluks of Villupuram district; Ulundurpettai, Vridhachalam, Tittagudi taluks of Cuddalore district; Udaiyarpalayam, Ariyalur taluk of Perambalur district; and Lalgudi taluk of Tiruchchirappalli district of Tamil Nadu state.The link canal alignment passes through Pennar basin, Streams between Pennar and Palar basins, Palar basin and streams between Palar and Cauvery basins. The link canal takes off from the right flank of Somasila dam with a full supply level of 95.420 m. and runs parallel on right side of the Kandaleru flood flow canal, upto RD 10 km. The canal generally runs in south direction till it out-falls into Grand Anicut across Cauvery River at RD 529.190 km. The major rivers that would be crossed by the canal are Swarnamukhi, Arani Ar, Nagari, Palar, Cheyyar, Ponnaiyar, and Vellar. The districts that would be benefited by the link canal through enroute irrigation are Nellore, Chittoor of Andhra Pradesh state and Tiruvallur, Kancheepuram, Vellore, Tiruvannamalai, Villupuram, Cuddalore districts of Tamil Nadu state and Pondicherry (U.T). -
Assessment of Fluoride Concentration in Palar River in Kanchipuram District, Tamil Nadu, India R
Research Article Assessment of fluoride concentration in Palar River in Kanchipuram district, Tamil Nadu, India R. Pradeep Kumar1*, R. Priya1, Lakshmi Thangavelu2 ABSTRACT Back ground: River Palar is one of the most contaminated rivers of India due to various industries. Aim:To study the fluoride concentration in the Pallar river. Four river water samples were collected during the pre-monsoon season spanning over June 2015. Methodology: Fluoride levels were analyzed by standardized analytical method by the Chief Water Analyst, State Level Water Testing Laboratory, Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai (ISO 9001–2000 - Certified). Result: In the present study, fluoride contents in all samples ranged between 0.18 and 0.22 mg/l, which are less than the optimum range of 1.5 mg/l, as recommended by the WHO. KEY WORDS: Fluoride, Palar River, Water quality INTRODUCTION of the global tanning factories are located in this state. Out of this, 449 units are located in the Vellore River water resources are highly essential for various district, particularly in the Palar basin (Upper Palar). domestic, agricultural, and industrial purposes. Hence, The impact of tannery wastewater disposal leads to the consumption rate is increasing day by day in the environmental as well as social disharmony of the areas where surface water sources are not enough to society and also acts as a major industrial pollution meet the demands. In recent decades, water pollution source that the country faces today. Even though has been considered as an important agenda for this problem persists for a long time, it has attracted various research activities due to its significant role in serious attention only in recent time. -
Introduction the Chennai Basin Group Rivers Are Situated Between
CHENNAI BASIN Introduction The Chennai basin group rivers are situated between latitudes 12o 30’ 00’’ to 13 o35’00’’ N and longitudes 79o15’00’’ to 80o22’30’’E and is located into the northern part of Tamil Nadu. The Chennai Basin Group of rivers is Araniar, Korattalaiyar or Kosasthalaiyar, Cooum and Adyar and small minor stream on the southern part of the basin. The Chennai basin comprises of 8 sub basins as shown in Plate:CHE-02. The northern part of Chennai basin is occupied by Andhra Pradesh and Pulicat lake, south and west by the Palar river basin and east by Bay of Bengal. The total geographical area of Chennai basin within Tamil Nadu is 6118.34 sq km totally. It covers in the Survey of India toposheets 57‘O’, 57 ‘P’, 66’C’, and 66 ‘D’ and it also covers in Chennai, Kancheepuram, Thiruvallur and Vellore districts. The administrative setup of the Chennai basin group is given below (Figure 1) Sl DISTRICT TALUK Sl BLOCK BLOCK/ARE No No A FALLING WITHIN THE BASIN AREA IN Sq Km 1. Kancheepura Thirukalunkundram 1 Thirukalukundram 71.60 m Tambaram 2 St. Thomas Mount 217.49 3 Thiruporur 411.82 Chengalpattu 4 Kattankulathur 158.83 5 Kancheepuram 10.14 Kancheepuram 6 Walajabad 73.27 7 Sriperumpudur 248.69 Sriperumpudur 8 Kundrathur 203.70 BLOCK/ARE A FALLING Sl Sl DISTRICT TALUK BLOCK WITHIN THE No No BASIN AREA IN Sq Km Gummidipoond Gummidipoondi 9 420.51 i 10 Minjur 478.69 Ponneri 11 Cholavaram 193.85 12 Puzhal 127.10 Ambattur 13 Villivakkam 210.61 Poonamallee 14 Poonamallee 178.33 2. -
GRMB Annual Report 2018-19 | 59
Government of India Ministry of Jal Shakti Department of Water Resources, River Development & Ganga Rejuvenation Godavari River Management Board GODAVARI RIVER Origin Brahmagiri near Trimbakeshwar, Nashik Dist., Maharashtra Geographical Area 9.50 % of Total Geographical Area of India Location Latitude – 16°19’ to 22°34’ North Longitude – 73°24’ to 83° 40’ East Boundaries West: Western Ghats North: Satmala hills, Ajanta range and the Mahadeo hills East: Eastern Ghats & Bay of Bengal South: Balaghat & Mahadeo ranges, stretching from eastern flank of Western Ghats & Anantgiri and other ranges of the hills. Ridges separate the Godavari basin from Krishna basin. Catchment Area 3,12,812 Sq.km. Length of the River 1465 km States Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Odisha, Karnataka, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh and Puducherry (Yanam). Length in AP & TS 772 km Major Tributaries Pravara, Manjira, Manair – Right side of River Purna, Pranhita, Indravati, Sabari – Left side of River Sub- basins Twelve (G1- G12) Select Dams/ Head works Gangapur Dam, Jayakwadi Dam, Srirama Sagar, Sripada across Main Godavari Yellampally, Kaleshwaram Projects (Medigadda, Annaram & Sundilla barrages), Dummugudem Anicut, Polavaram Dam (under construction), Dowleswaram Barrage. Hydro power stations Upper Indravati 600 MW Machkund 120 MW Balimela 510 MW Upper Sileru 240 MW Lower Sileru 460 MW Upper Kolab 320 MW Pench 160 MW Ghatghar pumped storage 250 MW Polavaram (under 960 MW construction) ANNUAL REPORT 2018-19 GODAVARI RIVER MANAGEMENT BOARD 5th Floor, Jalasoudha, -
Curtain Raiser on the Events at NHPC's 280 MW Dhauliganga
Working for water resources development as if democracy, people and environment matter Vol 11 | Issue 7-8 | August-September 2013 Rs. 15/- Index Uttarakhand Floods of June 2013: Curtain Raiser on the events Curtain Raiser on the events at at NHPC’s 280 MW NHPC’s 280 MW Dhauliganga HEP Dhauliganga HEP 1 "This fascinating account of the events at the NHPC’s 280 MW Yettinahole Diversion: Dhauliganga HEP has been taken from a larger account of Uttarakhand An imprudent, Rs. 100 floods of June 2013 by E. Theophilus, titled “River Pulse”. For this de- Billion proposition 5 tailed eye opening piece, see: http://www.himalprakriti.org/ This account of the events at this Dhauliganga HEP during the Public pressure leads to Uttarakhand floods of June 2013 raises many questions. One of the changes in dam operation 13 biggest is, should this ill designed and wrongly operated power project be allowed to continue to operate or should it be asked to be decommis- CAG blows the lid off sioned? Would the people who cleared this ill designed project and people Massive irrigation scam who wrongly operated it be held accountable for their actions? These in Andhra Pradesh 18 are difficult questions, but not finding convincing answers to these will not be a prudent way forward. Unjustified Dam plagued by manipulated clearances 21 Days after walking down the Gori, Mahakali main-stem was already we go to the Sub-Divisional Magis- flowing at danger-mark. NHPC went Supreme Court’s directions trate of Dharchula sub-division, right ahead and opened their gates th on Uttarakhand Pramod Kumar, who is busy coordi- at full on the night of 16 June, with- Hydropower Projects 25 nating rescue and relief on a war- out authorization or any prior warn- footing, but still has the courtesy to ing to anybody1 but their own office- meet.